Table 3.

Comparison of ERF Component loading factors by subject subgroup

Component	AUD				VIS				AV
	HP ($n=89$)	LP ($n=81$)	$t\left(165\right)$	$p$ value	HP ($n=89$)	LP ($n=81$)	$t\left(165\right)$	$p$ value	HP ($n=89$)	LP ($n=81$)	$t\left(165\right)$	$p$ value
	$M\left(SD\right)$				$M\left(SD\right)$				$M\left(SD\right)$
Occipital/M150	-	-	-	< 0.0001a	0.61(0.91)	−0.63(0.62)	7.86	< 0.0001a	0.015(1.07)	0.013(0.93)	0.166	0.864a
Right Temporal/M300a	−0.62(0.83)	0.56(0.79)	7.31	< 0.0001a	-	-	-	< 0.0001a	0.54(0.85)	−0.31(1.05)	5.65	< 0.001a
Late Central/M400	−0.57(0.81)	0.64(0.78)	−8.5	< 0.0001a	−0.51(0.75)	0.52(0.96)	−7.22	< 0.0001a	−0.56(0.83)	0.51(0.85)	−7.20	< 0.0001a

^a$p$ values (FDR corrected, $p<0.05$) from post hoc two-tailed $t$-tests adjusted for age, gender, and parental SES.

^bthe corresponding data are shown in Fig. 7.