Table 7.
Comparisons of different types of errors and richness of productions in oral production task between CON and DYS groups
| Control (n = 18) M (SD) |
Dyslexia (n = 18) M (SD) |
p-value* | d value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Errors | |||||
| % Grammatical errors | 9.05 (4.29) | 13.79 (7.85) | 0.155 | − 0.749 | |
| % Semantic errors | 0.05 (0.22) | 3.04 (2.56) | < 0.001 | − 1.649 | |
| % Pronunciation errors | 0.69 (1.49) | 1.74 (3.06) | 0.591 | − 0.439 | |
| % Self-corrections | 0.80 (1.10) | 0.96 (1.43) | 0.712 | − 0.124 | |
| Richness of the productions | |||||
| MLU | 14.68 (4.12) | 11.88 (3.80) | 0.168 | 0.705 | |
| SI | 1.91 (0.53) | 1.43 (0.51) | 0.048 | 0.940 | |
| Lexical diversity | 5.50 (0.69) | 4.67 (0.86) | 0.021 | 1.063 | |
| Oral productivity | 79.54 (29.10) | 68.41 (22.43) | 0.416 | 0.428 | |
MLU mean length of utterances in words, SI subordination index *Holm-Bonferroni corrected p-value