ABSTRACT
Background:
Advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) have paved the way for ultra-customized aesthetic solutions in dentistry, particularly in smile design. Conventional smile design methods often fall short in providing a fully personalized outcome, necessitating the development of AI-enhanced software to optimize results by considering facial features, dental parameters, and patient preferences.
Materials and Methods:
A prototype AI-enhanced smile design software was developed using a combination of convolutional neural networks for facial analysis and generative adversarial networks for creating customized smile designs. The study involved 50 participants, each undergoing facial feature scanning, digital dental impressions, and patient-specific aesthetic input collection. The software’s performance was evaluated based on user satisfaction, aesthetic quality, and procedural efficiency. A comparison was made with conventional smile design methods to assess improvements in outcomes.
Results:
The AI-enhanced software demonstrated significant improvements in aesthetic outcomes and efficiency. The mean patient satisfaction score was 9.2/10 compared to 7.5/10 with conventional methods. Aesthetic quality was rated higher by experts (mean score: 8.8/10 vs. 7.3/10), and the time required for smile design reduced by 40%. The integration of AI allowed for more precise customization, aligning with patient preferences and anatomical considerations.
Conclusion:
The development of AI-enhanced smile design software represents a significant step toward achieving ultra-customized aesthetic outcomes in dentistry. By integrating advanced facial analysis and design algorithms, the software offers a superior alternative to conventional methods, promising enhanced satisfaction, efficiency, and aesthetic precision.
KEYWORDS: Aesthetic dentistry, artificial intelligence, customized dental solutions, dental software development, generative adversarial networks, smile design
INTRODUCTION
Smile aesthetics play a pivotal role in the overall facial appearance and psychological well-being of an individual, making it a critical aspect of modern dentistry. Advances in technology, particularly in digital dentistry, have led to the development of innovative tools for smile design that aim to improve precision and patient satisfaction. However, traditional smile design methods often rely heavily on clinician expertise and subjective judgment, which may result in limited customization and variability in outcomes.[1]
Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a transformative technology in healthcare, offering solutions that enhance diagnostic accuracy, treatment planning, and patient-centered care. In dentistry, AI has shown promise in applications such as caries detection, orthodontic planning, and prosthodontic design.[2] Leveraging AI for smile design provides a unique opportunity to incorporate data-driven algorithms for achieving ultra-customized aesthetic outcomes tailored to the unique features and preferences of each patient.
Recent studies have highlighted the potential of AI-enhanced tools, such as convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and generative adversarial networks (GANs), in creating personalized treatment plans. These technologies enable precise facial analysis and realistic simulations, addressing the limitations of conventional techniques.[3,4]
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Software development
A prototype AI-enhanced smile design software was developed using state-of-the-art machine learning algorithms. CNNs were employed for facial feature analysis, including lip contour, smile line, and facial symmetry. GANs were used to generate highly realistic and customized smile designs based on the analyzed data. The software also incorporated an intuitive user interface to enable clinician-patient collaboration during the design process.
Study design
This study employed a prospective observational design to evaluate the software’s performance. Fifty participants (25 male and 25 female) aged 18–45 years were recruited from a dental clinic. Inclusion criteria included individuals with a desire for aesthetic smile enhancement, good oral health, and no major craniofacial deformities. Exclusion criteria were active periodontal disease, systemic conditions affecting oral health, and prior cosmetic dental treatments.
Data collection
Digital photographs of participants’ full faces, intraoral regions, and dental arches were obtained using high-resolution imaging equipment. Additionally, digital impressions of the upper and lower arches were captured using an intraoral scanner. Each participant provided feedback on their aesthetic preferences, including smile width, tooth shape, and shade.
Software workflow
The collected data were fed into the software, which analyzed the facial and dental features and generated personalized smile designs. The designs were reviewed by a team of three dental professionals with expertise in aesthetic dentistry. Adjustments were made based on clinician inputs and patient preferences to ensure optimal outcomes.
Evaluation metrics
The software was evaluated on three parameters:
Aesthetic Quality: Assessed by a panel of five independent aesthetic dentists using a visual analog scale ranging from 1 to 10.
Efficiency: Measured as the time taken to generate a finalized smile design compared to conventional methods.
Patient Satisfaction: Determined using a post-treatment satisfaction survey with a 10-point Likert scale.
Statistical analysis
Data were analyzed using SPSS software (version 25.0).
RESULTS
Aesthetic quality
The mean aesthetic quality score, as rated by the panel of independent aesthetic dentists, was significantly higher for the AI-enhanced method (8.8 ± 0.7) compared to the conventional method (7.3 ± 1.2). The improvement was statistically significant (P < 0.05), as shown in Table 1.
Table 1.
Comparison of aesthetic quality scores
| Method | Mean Score±SD | P |
|---|---|---|
| AI-Enhanced | 8.8±0.7 | <0.05 |
| Conventional | 7.3±1.2 |
Efficiency
The time required to generate a finalized smile design using the AI-enhanced software was significantly lower than that of the conventional method. The mean time for the AI-enhanced method was 45 minutes compared to 75 minutes for the conventional method, representing a 40% reduction in time [Table 2].
Table 2.
Comparison of time efficiency
| Method | Mean Time (minutes) ±SD | Percentage Reduction | P |
|---|---|---|---|
| AI-Enhanced | 45±5 | 40% | <0.05 |
| Conventional | 75±7 |
Patient satisfaction
Participants reported higher satisfaction levels with the outcomes generated by the AI-enhanced software. The mean satisfaction score was 9.2 ± 0.5 for the AI-enhanced method compared to 7.5 ± 0.8 for the conventional method (P < 0.05), as detailed in Table 3.
Table 3.
Patient satisfaction scores
| Method | Mean Satisfaction Score±SD | P |
|---|---|---|
| AI-Enhanced | 9.2±0.5 | <0.05 |
| Conventional | 7.5±0.8 |
The results indicate that the AI-enhanced smile design software outperforms conventional methods in terms of aesthetic outcomes, time efficiency, and patient satisfaction [Tables 1-3]. These findings support the utility of AI in improving aesthetic dentistry practices.
DISCUSSION
The results of this study demonstrate that AI-enhanced smile design software provides significant advantages over conventional methods in achieving customized aesthetic outcomes. By leveraging advanced algorithms, such as CNNs and GANs, the software integrates facial and dental data to deliver more precise and personalized smile designs.
The aesthetic quality scores achieved using the AI-enhanced software were notably higher than those of conventional methods. This improvement can be attributed to the software’s ability to analyze intricate facial features and simulate realistic outcomes tailored to individual preferences. Previous studies have highlighted the potential of AI in generating highly aesthetic dental restorations, aligning with our findings.[1,2,3] The incorporation of patient-specific data further ensures that the design outcomes align closely with patient expectations, addressing a limitation of traditional approaches.[4]
The significant reduction in the time required for smile design reflects the efficiency of AI in streamlining clinical workflows. Conventional methods often involve multiple iterative steps, including manual adjustments and patient consultations, which can be time-consuming.[5] In contrast, AI algorithms can rapidly process large datasets and provide immediate design suggestions. This finding aligns with studies that have reported time efficiency as a major advantage of AI in dental applications, such as treatment planning and prosthodontic design.[6,7]
CONCLUSION
This study underscores the transformative potential of AI in aesthetic dentistry, particularly in smile design. By combining advanced algorithms with clinical expertise, AI-enhanced tools offer a superior alternative to traditional methods, ensuring better aesthetic quality, efficiency, and patient satisfaction.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
Acknowledgments
The author was thankful to the Deanship of Graduate Studies and Scientific Research at Dar Al Uloom University for the Support of this project.
Funding Statement
Nil.
REFERENCES
- 1.Baaj RE, Alangari TA. Artificial intelligence applications in smile design dentistry: A scoping review. J Prosthodont. 2025;34:341–9. doi: 10.1111/jopr.14000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Revilla-León M, Gómez-Polo M, Vyas S, Barmak BA, Galluci GO, Att W, et al. Artificial intelligence applications in implant dentistry: A systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2023;129:293–300. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.05.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Revilla-León M, Gómez-Polo M, Vyas S, Barmak AB, Özcan M, Att W, et al. Artificial intelligence applications in restorative dentistry: A systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2022;128:867–75. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.02.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Rokhshad R, Karteva T, Chaurasia A, Richert R, Mörch CM, Tamimi F, et al. Artificial intelligence and smile design: An e-Delphi consensus statement of ethical challenges. J Prosthodont. 2024;33:730–5. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13858. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Shetty S, Gali S, Augustine D, Sv S. Artificial intelligence systems in dental shade-matching: A systematic review. J Prosthodont. 2024;33:519–32. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13805. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Ahmed N, Abbasi MS, Zuberi F, Qamar W, Halim MSB, Maqsood A, et al. Artificial Intelligence Techniques: Analysis, Application, and Outcome in Dentistry—A Systematic Review. Biomed Res Int 2021. 2021:9751564. doi: 10.1155/2021/9751564. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Crider K, Williams J, Qi YP, Gutman J, Yeung L, Mai C, et al. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022;2:CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]