Abstract
Thanks to advanced treatments, many breast cancer (BC) patients become long-term survivors, yet suffer a diminished quality of life (QOL) due to estrogen deprivation. This affects adherence to endocrine treatments, potentially compromising outcomes. While there is increasing recognition of genitourinary side effects, vulvovaginal health remains under-addressed. Many clinicians overlook the impact of endocrine therapy on the genitourinary system and lack knowledge about safe and effective treatments, leading to undertreatment and aggravated symptoms. Proper treatments not only boost the QOL but also enhance endocrine therapy adherence, directly influencing long-term outcomes. We offer an updated review and guidelines on vulvovaginal health for BC survivors. Our review details the genitourinary hypoestrogenic state, its effects on the genitourinary system, its diagnosis, as well as the safety, effectiveness, and available treatment options for BC patients. Furthermore, we offer practical recommendations for managing vulvovaginal symptoms, considering underlying mechanisms and the safe use of topical estrogen, with attention to receptor and cancer status.
Keywords: aromatase inhibitors, breast cancer, genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM), hypoestrogenism, tamoxifen, vaginal atrophy
Plain language summary
Practical care for vaginal health in women after breast cancer
Many breast cancer survivors experience a lower quality of life due to the lack of estrogen caused by their treatments. This can lead to uncomfortable symptoms, especially in the genital and urinary areas, and make it harder for them to adhere to their hormone therapy, potentially compromising their outcomes. Unfortunately, these issues are often overlooked by doctors, who may not feel confident that they have effective and safe tools to minimize and improve these complaints. This article reviews the effects of low estrogen on the genital and urinary systems and offers updated guidelines on how to diagnose and treat these problems in breast cancer patients. It includes practical recommendations for managing symptoms and discusses the safe use of treatments like topical estrogen, considering the patient’s cancer type and hormone status. Proper treatment can improve the quality of life and help patients stay on track with their cancer therapy, ultimately improving outcomes.
Introduction
Breast cancer (BC) is the most commonly diagnosed cancer among women 1 with a decreasing mortality rate thanks to the progress in widespread early screening and improvements in systemic therapies. 2 In the United States, the 5-year survival rates are as high as 90% 3 (reaching as high as 99% for women free of lymph node metastases). 4 Moreover, although most women with BC are postmenopausal with a median age at diagnosis of 62 years, 20%–30% of cases will be diagnosed in women younger than 50 years of age, and 7% will be diagnosed in those younger than 40 years of age. 5 Thus, addressing survivors’ unique post-treatment needs is critical to providing quality healthcare and ensuring treatment adherence. 6
Many BC survivors of all ages suffer from menopausal symptoms of varying severities at some point during their cancer journey due to an estrogen deficiency state resulting from ongoing anti-estrogenic treatment, chemotherapy-induced amenorrhea, premature ovarian insufficiency (POI), or spontaneous menopause. As conventional estrogen replacement therapy is usually contraindicated, and many healthcare providers are unaware of other effective treatment modalities, many BC survivors remain undertreated.7–9 Unlike vasomotor symptoms, such as hot flashes that usually improve over time, genitourinary symptoms, including vaginal dryness, burning, dysuria, and dyspareunia, are generally progressive without effective therapy.10–12 Unfortunately, these conditions are underdiagnosed and undertreated as many clinicians often overlook and misdiagnose vulvovaginal symptoms that worsen with time, and a detrimental effect on the quality of life (QOL) is seen.13–17 Consequently, there is an increased risk of compromising BC treatment compliance, with a reported discontinuation rate of 20%–40% of BC survivors receiving endocrine treatment due to hypoestrogenism-related side effects.18–20 In the SOFT and TEXT studies examining endocrine therapies for pre-menopausal patients at diagnosis, 21%–25% discontinued their prescribed oral therapies by the 4-year mark. Among those on ovarian function suppression and exemestane, there was no observed improvement in vaginal dryness over time. 21 Thus, healthcare professionals (HCPs) treating BC survivors must understand and mitigate endocrine therapy (ET) side effects to improve patient QOL and treatment adherence. Thorough knowledge of hormonal and non-hormonal treatment options is crucial for HCPs to address potential therapy-induced complications.8,12,22
This review outlines strategies for managing genitourinary health in BC patients, emphasizing the roles of endocrine therapies and chemotherapy in hypoestrogenic states and their genitourinary effects. We present an updated approach to diagnose and treat estrogen-deficiency-related vulvovaginal symptoms in these survivors.
Adjuvant therapy in BC survivors and hypoestrogenism
Beyond local breast and lymph node interventions (surgery, with potential radiation), most women receive (neo)-adjuvant treatments, such as hormonal therapy, chemotherapy, biological agents, and immunotherapy, based on tumor type to reduce recurrence risk. 4 About 70%–80% of BCs are estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, with racial and ethnic variations.5,23 Tamoxifen or an aromatase inhibitor (AI) is typically prescribed as adjuvant ET for these cases.24,25 Tamoxifen, a selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM), blocks ER in normal and BC cells. Its interaction with vaginal ER may vary based on hormonal state: in premenopausal women, it tends to exhibit antiestrogenic effects, while in postmenopausal women, it can occasionally mimic estrogen, enhancing vaginal secretions.26–29 AIs inhibit aromatase, the enzyme converting androgens to estrogens peripherally, suppressing plasma estrogen levels by blocking 95% of its synthesis and reducing concentrations from 20 to 3 pmol/L or lower.28,30 AIs are effective only in patients without functional ovaries. For premenopausal women on AIs, ovarian suppression is typically induced24,25 either with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a), less frequently surgical oophorectomy, or rarely, in metastatic cases, ovarian irradiation.31,32 Incorporation of AIs as part of adjuvant ET is the preferred approach in post-menopausal women and is recommended along with ovarian suppression in pre-menopausal patients at high risk of recurrence. 33 Fulvestrant, another adjuvant ET, is a competitive ER antagonist that acts as an ER down regulator and is used in patients with advanced or metastatic disease. 34
Adjuvant chemotherapy, frequently combined with ET, depends on factors like lymph node status and tumor size. Gonadotoxic drugs, for example, cyclophosphamide, can induce POI by damaging follicles, notably in women over 40, within a year post-BC treatment. Over half of BC patients in their 40s and 15%–30% under 35 face complete ovarian failure depending on the treatment.35,36 The ovarian impact of newer agents like immunotherapy remains unclear.
While these therapies significantly improve clinical outcomes and survival rates,8,37 they also induce both acute and chronic estrogen deprivation effects in multiple organs and tissues.38,39
Hypoestrogenism effect on the genitourinary tract—physiology
The vulvar vestibule, vagina, urethra, and bladder trigone derive from the estrogen-responsive urogenital sinus. ER are also found in pelvic muscles, endopelvic fascia, and vaginal and vulvar neurons, highlighting estrogen’s pivotal role in influencing genitourinary functions, pain modulation, and muscle composition and function. Estrogen withdrawal can lead to significant anatomic and physiological changes attributed to reduced collagen content and hyalinization, decreased elastin and adipose tissue, altered appearance and function of smooth muscle cells, increased density of connective tissue, loss of water-retaining ability, fewer blood vessels, and reduced blood flow. Regarding the vaginal microbiome, diminished estrogen leads to fewer glycogenated superficial cells, a shift from lactobacillus bacterial dominance to anaerobic Gram-negative rods and Gram-positive cocci, consequently raising vaginal pH. 11 Table 1 summarizes the physiologic effect of hypoestrogenism on the genitourinary tissues.11,28,40
Table 1.
The physiologic effect of hypoestrogenism on the urogenital tract.
| Urogenital site | Effect of hypoestrogenism |
|---|---|
| Loss of labial and vulvar fullness, turgor, and elasticity | |
| Loss of pubic hair | |
| Labia minora thinning and regression | |
| Constriction of introitus | |
| Vagina | Thin, pale, and smooth vaginal epithelium |
| Short and narrow vaginal vault | |
| Decreased flexibility and elasticity | |
| Friable tissue with petechiae, ulcerations, and tears in severe cases | |
| Vaginal microbiota | Anaerobic Gram-negative rods and Gram-positive cocci microbiota, loss of lactobacilli dominance |
| Vaginal secretions | Diminish secretions |
| Elevated pH | |
| Pelvic floor muscles | Weakness and mobility limitation |
| Urinary tract | Reduced urethral closure pressure due to weakening of the surrounding tissue |
| Decreased urethral smooth muscle sensitivity | |
| Reduced bladder sensory threshold |
Clinical consequences of hypoestrogenism on the genitourinary tract
Reduced estrogen levels in genitourinary tissues give rise to genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM), also termed vulvovaginal atrophy or genitourinary atrophy. 41 GSM affects the vulva, vagina, urethra, bladder, and pelvic floor, manifesting as genital, sexual, and urinary symptoms. Genital concerns include vulvar irritation, altered skin barrier sensitivity, dryness, and discharge. Sexual issues arise from inadequate arousal, lubrication, epithelial thinning, and potential anatomic constriction (narrowing and stenosis), causing discomfort or pain during intercourse. Reduced vaginal capillary blood flow can impair engorgement during arousal, exacerbating dyspareunia, and diminished sexual function.28,40 Urinary symptoms result from the atrophic epithelium and weakening of the surrounding tissue that can be expressed as urgency, frequency, nocturia, incontinence, dysuria, and recurrent urinary tract infections (UTIs).28,40
GSM in BC survivors
Symptoms of GSM are frequent in BC survivors for several reasons. Many patients are menopausal at diagnosis, with symptoms intensified either by cessation of estrogen replacement therapy or the effects of chemotherapy on residual post-menopausal ovarian estrogen synthesis. 17 Younger patients may face POI from chemotherapy or ovary removal.42,43 Additionally, in women with ER-positive tumors, the use of GnRH-a and AIs for estrogen suppression has increased over time, 44 with treatment periods sometimes lasting up to 10 years.8,4,45 Consequently, BC survivors exhibit GSM symptoms at a higher rate compared to the general population (74% vs 50%),15,29,39,46,47 and these symptoms are often more severe. 29 In young women, the rapid estrogen drop further amplifies these symptoms and increases distress from changes in sexual function.48,49 Moreover, GSM that develops in the cancer treatment setting has been associated with more significant sexual dysfunction, distress, and poorer QOL outcomes.15,48–50 Data also suggest that although long-term survivors of BC often report normalization of physical and emotional functioning, they experience continued difficulty with sexual functioning and satisfaction for five or more years after treatment.12,41
GSM diagnosis
GSM diagnosis involves a comprehensive clinical evaluation, which includes symptom assessment and physical examination. For a confirmed diagnosis, at least one bothersome sign or symptom unrelated to other conditions, such as vulvovaginal dermatoses or infection, is necessary. 11
History
The goal of history-taking is to ascertain the presence, severity, and impact of GSM symptoms on sexual health, intimacy, and QOL. Since women might withhold details due to embarrassment or seeing GSM as a natural aging consequence, proactive inquiry by HCPs is crucial, especially in BC survivors.11,16,43,51–56
This process should consider menstrual patterns, past treatments, and other potential causative factors. It is essential to differentiate symptoms tied to estrogen loss from other factors like inflammation, infection, or prior surgeries. A sexual history can help determine if symptoms relate to sexual activity. A detailed sexual history can correlate symptoms to sexual activity. Given the profound impact of GSM on QOL in BC survivors,30,48,50,57 understanding its daily and intimate implications is vital. 28
Physical examination
The gynecologic examination should identify signs consistent with GSM and eliminate other pathologic conditions that may cause similar symptoms, such as vaginitis, lichen sclerosus, or other dermatopathology.11,12
The external genitalia may display diminished mons pubis and labia majora, reduced hair, elasticity, and moisture, as well as constricted introitus. The labia minora might show fusion or resorption, with a more noticeable clitoral and urethral meatus. A caruncle might appear at the urethral meatus, and the vestibular tissue may become pale. Vaginal atrophy typically presents as a pale, dry, smooth epithelium with decreased rugation. Underlying blood vessels may be visible through the thinned epithelium. A thin yellow discharge is common. Inflammation might show as erythema, petechiae, friability, bleeding, or purulent discharge. The vagina may lose elasticity, shorten, narrow, and have obliterated fornices, aligning the cervix with the vault.11,28 When the main complaint is dyspareunia, a targeted physical examination should also be done to identify the specific pain component. This algorithm was recently described in our previous work 58 and should include an evaluation of vestibular tenderness, vestibular atrophy, pelvic muscle hypertonicity, and tender annular hymenal ring or scar tissue.
Complimentary examination to support GSM diagnosis
Wet-mount microscopy and vaginal pH assist in GSM diagnosis. A pH over 5.0, excluding factors like infections or semen, signifies estrogen-deficient vaginal atrophy.59,60 Microscopy shows immature vaginal cells with pronounced nuclei (parabasal cells), more than one white blood cell per epithelial cell, and few or no lactobacilli. A shift to a diverse microbiota, including enteric organisms commonly associated with UTIs, may be observed. 12
Assessment tools for evaluating GSM symptoms
For assessing GSM and sexual function, standardized tools like the visual analog scale (VAS), vaginal health index (VHI), and female sexual function index (FSFI) are employed to monitor outcomes.12,61
VAS records patient disturbances on a 10-point scale, and the FSFI, validated for female cancer survivors, assesses sexual function through self-reports.62,63 Both provide insights into subjective symptom severity. 64 The Vaginal and Vulvar Assessment Scales, recently validated, also evaluate GSM symptom severity in cancer survivors. 65
GSM physical signs are often assessed using pH level, VHI, and the vaginal maturation index (VMI). 64 The VHI, introduced by Bachmann 66 in the 1990s, is widely used as an objective tool, although mainly relying on subjective parameters. Of its five parameters assessed during a speculum exam, only vaginal pH is objective; the others—vaginal elasticity, fluid volume, epithelial integrity, and moisture—are subjective, introducing potential variability between and within observers. 61 A score below 15 suggests atrophy. The absence of clear instructions makes VHI evaluations susceptible to examiner interpretation.61,67,68 The VMI is a cytologic score assessing atrophy, based on the evaluation of the ratio between parabasal, intermediate, and superficial cells in a vaginal microscopic smear, aiding in both diagnosis and treatment effectiveness. 69
The “modified Schirmer test” employs calibrated filter paper and is validated for objective assessment of vaginal dryness treatment efficacy. Contrary to pH, VMI, and VHI, which are influenced by estrogen, this test evaluates outcomes of non-estrogen-dependent treatments as well. 70
Several subjective questionnaires exist to assess QOL parameters. These include the Most Bothersome Symptoms, the Day-to-Day Impact on Vaginal Aging Questionnaire, the Vulvovaginal Symptoms Questionnaire, and the Vulvar Pain Assessment Questionnaire. 64
Treatment
In addressing GSM in BC survivors, the primary objective is QOL enhancement. Educating patients on GSM and BC treatment effects is vital. Treatment decisions should factor in patients’ therapeutic needs and BC recurrence concerns, with discussions covering known mechanisms of action, efficacy, potential side effects, safety data, and any knowledge gaps regarding specific risks8,12,17,21,71,72 (Table 2). Embracing a shared decision-making approach based on informed consent 73 is paramount, emphasizing that multiple treatment trials might be needed to attain individual patient’s efficacy and tolerance. 8 In relevant cases, consultation with the woman’s oncology team is advised.12,22 Upon initiating therapy, subsequent follow-ups should evaluate symptom improvement, treatment adherence, and potential barriers. 12
Table 2.
Available treatment options for GSM in BC survivors.
| Treatment | Mechanism of action | Indication and instruction | Efficacy | Safety |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Non-hormonal interventions | ||||
| Vaginal lubricants(water, silicone, and oil-based products) | Form a short-term physical barrier that reduces friction between surfaces and diminishes discomfort. | - Use during sexual activity - applied to both partners’ genitals prior to vaginal penetration - Lubricants with an osmolality of <380 mOsm/kg and pH in the normal range (3.8–4.5) are recommended |
Short-duration efficacy in reducing dyspareunia resulting from mild dryness, irritation, and friction | - Possible genital irritation with additives such as parabens, glycerin, warming properties, flavors, perfumes, and spermicides - Oil-based lubricants can erode condoms |
| Vaginal moisturizers (Gel, cream) |
Maintaining prolonged tissue integrity and elasticity as well as replacing normal vaginal secretions by: - Attracting and retaining moisture - Forming a protective barrier to prevent water loss - Often maintain the vagina’s optimal acidic pH |
- Recommended when daily symptoms are present - Use regularly to be effective - 3–5 times a week before bedtime |
- Effective in reducing daily mild-moderated vulvovaginal irritation, itching, and burning sensations - Not suitable for severe GSM |
- Possible genital irritation with additives such as parabens, glycerin, warming properties, flavors, perfumes, and spermicides |
| Hyaluronic acid vaginal preparations | - Stimulates the tissue’s water-retention capabilities. - Releases water molecules into the tissue → providing lubricating and moisturizing effects to maintain a proper level of hydration and viscoelasticity |
- 3–5 times a week before bedtime - Insert into the vagina - Apply manually on the vulvar skin |
- Improving vaginal and vulvar dryness, discomfort, irritation - Decreasing vestibular irritation |
Possible genital irritation with additives |
| Vitamin D and E suppositories |
- Vitamin D is involved in regulating cell development and differentiation, especially in the stratified epithelium tissue of the vagina - Vitamin E has an anti-inflammatory, antioxidant role, and healing properties |
- Vitamin E 30–200 IU - Vitamin D 1000 IU - Use every night |
Efficient in: - Lowering pH, - increased VMI, - Improved subjective GSM symptoms |
- |
| Lidocaine | Topical anesthesia for tender vulvar vestibule | - Topical aqueous 4% lidocaine - Fully saturated cotton ball applied to the vulvar vestibule a few minutes before sexual activity |
- Reduction in dyspareunia due to vestibular tenderness - Reversing vestibular sensitivity |
- Considered a safe option for painful intercourse in BC survivors - Male partners may report penile numbness |
| Vaginal dilators +/− PFPT +/− vibratory stimulation |
Dilators provide mechanical stretching of the tissue and maintain vaginal elasticity Vibratory stimulation increases blood flow to the tissue PFPT relaxing pelvic floor muscles can aid with both dilators and vibratory stimulation |
- Recommended to use several times per week, although the ideal duration and frequency are unknown - vaginal dilators should be used in graduated sizes - Adjunctive work with a pelvic floor physical therapist has a beneficial outcome |
- Reduce dyspareunia resulting from loss of vaginal capacity and narrowed introitus - Improve elasticity - Give women confidence that they can insert an object into the vagina without pain |
Not supported by clinical trials on BC survivors |
| Energy-based treatments (CO2 laser, Er-YAG laser, RF) | Laser: The thermal effect of fractional beams of CO2 causes: - Minor wounds in the epithelium and lamina propria - Activation of fibroblasts - Increasing collagen production - Neovascularization and increased blood flow - Vaginal tissue regeneration RF: controlled electromagnetic waves to produce heat within the tissue: - Synthesis of collagen - Reorganization of collagen fibers - Tissue remodeling |
Data inconclusive regarding efficacy There is an undefined optimal number of treatment cycles and a need for retreatment for persistence efficacy |
Not yet clear if the reported improvement in GSM symptoms (dryness, itching, dyspareunia, dysuria, bleeding, and sexual function) is due to laser treatment or a placebo effect. | Long-term follow-up is needed to evaluate scar tissue formation and the overall safety of this intervention |
| Hormonal interventions | ||||
| Vaginal estrogen | Reverse the hypo-estrogenic state in the genitourinary system | - Second-line option for symptomatic BC survivors who failed non-hormonal treatments - Individualizing each case with oncologists - If indicated, short-term local hormonal therapy may be considered - The lowest effective dose should be used - First 2 weeks—once a day - Maintenance dose—twice a week |
Local estrogen is the most effective way to treat GSM All forms of vaginal estrogens have a similar effectiveness but different levels of systemic absorption Proven efficacy in most bothersome symptoms (dyspareunia, dryness, irritation, soreness, dysuria, or bleeding associated with sexual activity) |
Possible systemic absorption → Unknown association between systemic absorption and recurrence risk or stimulation of occult BC cells is unknown Safer on tamoxifen treatment rather than AIs Adverse events: - vaginal discharge, - vulvovaginal candidiasis, - vaginal bleeding - breast pain. |
| Intravaginal DHEA | DHEA is transformed within the vaginal mucosal cells to androstenedione, which, in turn, can be converted to testosterone and estrogens through aromatization | - A daily use low-dose DHEA vaginal insert - It is indicated for moderate to severe dyspareunia caused by vulvovaginal atrophy. |
Improvement in vaginal cell maturation, pH, dyspareunia, and FSFI score no studies directly comparing vaginal DHEA to vaginal estrogen in efficacy or hormone levels |
Its use raises concern as DHEA metabolizes into estrogen Increases DHEA-S and testosterone levels (within the lower quartile of the postmenopausal range) Vaginal discharge |
| Vaginal testosterone | Testosterone can induce the proliferation of the vaginal epithelium | Daily use of 150–300 µg of testosterone propionate | Efficient in improving signs and symptoms of vulvovaginal atrophy, dyspareunia, and sexual dysfunction | The safety of vaginal testosterone could not be concluded as longer follow-ups are needed |
| Oral Ospemifene | Ospemifene is a SERM with an estrogen agonist effect on vaginal tissues and bone and a probable antagonist effect in breast tissue. | - can be considered in high-risk women who are not concurrently taking another SERM for BC risk reduction - 60 mg/day |
- Improvement in GSM symptoms - Higher patient satisfaction and adherence compared to other local therapies |
Clinical studies have indicated no increased risk for BC incidence, recurrence, or breast-related safety concerns among patients receiving ospemifene |
AIs, aromatase inhibitors; BC, breast cancer; DHEA, dehydroepiandrosterone; FSFI, female sexual function index; GSM, genitourinary syndrome of menopause; PFPT, pelvic floor physiotherapy; RF, radiofrequency; SERM, selective estrogen receptor modulator; VMI, vaginal maturation index.
Vulvar skincare
Throughout life, the vulva is highly sensitive to various irritants compared to other skin areas. Age and estrogen deficiency amplify this vulnerability. Elevated skin pH and reduced lipid production diminish its antimicrobial action and healing speed, posing to trauma and infection. Frequent vulvar damage can occur from clothing abrasion or panty liners. Additionally, its proximity to the rectum and exposure to ammonia in those with urinary incontinence further heighten vulnerability. Hence, patients with vulvovaginal symptoms should adopt vulval care, using regular emollients and avoiding irritants (Box 1).13,58,74,75
Box 1.
Counseling patient on vulvar skin care.
| 1. Identify and avoid common irritants and allergens a. Sweat, urine, and feces b. Adult or baby wipes c. Colored or scented toilet paper d. Laundry detergents, fabric softeners, dryer sheets e. Sanitary pads and panty liners f. Soaps, bubble baths and salts, shampoos, conditioners g. Tea tree oil h. Vaginal hygiene products, including perfumes and deodorants i. Vaginal douching j. Contraceptive creams, jell, spermicide-containing condoms k. Over the counter and prescribed topical medication: i. Anesthetics—mostly those containing benzocaine ii. Antibacterial—mostly those containing neomycin iii. Antimycotics iv. Corticosteroids v. Hormonal creams vi. Preservatives found in cream bases—parabens, chlorcresol, benzyl alcohol. 2. Correction of skin barrier function a. Sitz baths—plain tepid water b. Pat dry the vulva after bathing (do not rub) c. Apply preservative-free emollient to hold moisture in the skin d. Add estrogen if indicated after consultation with the oncologist e. Treat superimposed infection when present (oral fluconazole, oral antibiotics). 3. Stop scratching a. Nonspecific: Sitz baths or cool packs b. Specific: i. Hydroxyzine or doxepin 10–75 mg for night itch. ii. Cetirizine 5–10 mg bid or Citalopram 20–40 mg for day itch. |
Lifestyle modification and control of underlying medical conditions
Women with multiple health conditions often experience urinary incontinence, genitourinary atrophy, and sexual issues. Beyond estrogen deficiency, contributors to GSM include smoking, infrequent coitus, vaginal nulliparity, and prior vaginal surgeries. 28 Smoking, linked to urgency, frequency, and rapid vaginal atrophy, reduces genitourinary blood flow.76–78 Quitting smoking and weight management can counter these effects by increasing capillary refill.79,80 A 5%–10% weight drop improves urinary incontinence. 81 Managing diabetes, obesity (BMI >30), and hypertension can also improve genitourinary and sexual health. 82 Additionally, addressing underlying emotional challenges can enhance sexual function and QOL in BC patients. 83
Non-hormonal regimens
Decreased estrogen levels can reduce genitourinary blood flow, causing atrophy, reduced lubrication, and elasticity, leading to vaginal dryness, dyspareunia, and possible introital lacerations during intercourse. First-line therapy for vulvar and vaginal dryness in women with BC are non-hormonal moisturizers and lubricants,12,14 sometimes combined with pelvic floor physical therapy (PFPT) and dilators for tissue elasticity enhancement.11,29,84–88
Other non-hormonal treatments found to be safe and effective in clinical studies include vitamin D and E suppositories,89–91 hyaluronic acid,92,93 as well as 4% topical lidocaine.94,95 Table 2 describes the mechanism of action, indication, efficacy, and safety of the available treatment options for GSM in BC survivors.
Moisturizers and lubricants
Both are over-the-counter products, effective in relieving discomfort and pain in women with mild to moderate vaginal dryness and are differentiated in their intended use.96,97
Lubricants alleviate friction and discomfort during penetrative and external sexual activity by providing lubrication with direct application to the external genitalia, vaginal introitus, and vagina. Lubricant formulations are water, silicone, or oil-based products, short-acting, and do not affect vaginal pH or underlying moisture content.14,96–99
It is recommended to choose lubricants with an osmolality of <380 mOsm/kg and a pH of 3.8–4.5 12 and to avoid products with irritants like parabens, glycerin, flavors, or perfumes as they may irritate the delicate genital tissues.87,96 Notably, parabens, weakly estrogenic compounds, can disrupt endocrine function, making paraben-free options crucial for at-risk populations. 96
Vaginal moisturizers aim to replicate natural secretions, enhancing vaginal health by retaining water and rehydrating tissues.100,101 Intended for regular use, their application frequency depends on atrophy severity, from daily to twice weekly.87,102 Certain moisturizers, made of acidic polymers, aid in vaginal pH regulation. Data demonstrate that polycarbophil-based non-hormonal moisturizers are superior to lubricants in temporarily mitigating vaginal dryness and genitourinary atrophy, enhancing vaginal moisture, fluid volume, pH, and elasticity while decreasing dryness, itching, and dyspareunia.103–105 In the broader general postmenopausal population, studies demonstrate moisturizers are equally effective as vaginal estrogen creams in addressing GSM symptoms.106–108 Yet, their efficacy is often transient and less pronounced for severe symptoms.
Intercourse and mechanical measures (physical therapy and dilator use)
Estrogen deficiency can decrease tissue elasticity, causing pain or reduced vaginal capacity. Non-hormonal interventions like vaginal dilators and PFPT aim to enhance this elasticity. 17 Regular vaginal penetration, via intercourse, lubricated fingers, or dilators, may prevent fibrotic changes, provide mechanical tissue stretching, and preserve vaginal elasticity. Maintaining sexual activities increases pelvic blood flow, promoting tissue health.28,79
Dilators, available in multiple sizes, benefit women abstaining from intercourse due to pain, emotional concerns, or lack of a partner. Consistent use, several times weekly, is crucial for effectiveness.17,109 Another significant benefit of using dilators is that they give women confidence that they can insert an object into the vagina without pain. 87
For symptomatic vaginal atrophy, combining vaginal moisturizers and lubricants with dilators is advised. Research has shown that vibratory stimulation applied to the vagina or directly to the clitoris can effectively reduce pain during vaginal penetration. 86
Vaginal pain often prompts women to involuntarily tighten their pelvic floor muscles during penetration, intensifying the discomfort in a continuous cycle. Therefore, guided PFPT by a skilled pelvic floor therapist is advised to mitigate this pain. Alongside, integrating PFPT with vaginal dilator training offers women insights into controlling pelvic muscle tension, enhancing dilator efficacy and outcomes.17,87,88,110
Mechanical therapy can be time-intensive, potentially leading to non-compliance. However, explaining the underlying pathophysiology of GSM and the rationale behind treatments can boost adherence. Emphasizing the benefits of regular vibratory stimulation for improving pelvic blood flow and the significance of dilator use can be motivational. Pelvic floor therapists play a crucial role in educating patients about pelvic muscle awareness and control, especially the importance of muscle relaxation. This education not only helps reduce pain from vaginal atrophy and during sexual activities but is also central to therapeutic success. 87
Energy-based treatment: fractional CO2 laser, erbium-YAG, and radiofrequency
Recent studies on intravaginal energy-based treatments for GSM emphasize laser and radiofrequency (RF) modalities. It is suggested that these approaches promote tissue regeneration and collagen production via controlled vaginal tissue injury, eliminating the need for hormonal interventions.111,112
Fractional CO2 and Er:YAG lasers employ fractionated light beams to induce minor epithelial and lamina propria injuries. This thermal action stimulates fibroblasts, boosting collagen output, neovascularization, and vaginal tissue repair.113,114 Conversely, RF utilizes electromagnetic waves for controlled heating, fostering collagen synthesis, fiber reorganization, and tissue remodeling. 112
No randomized studies have shown that CO2 and erbium-YAG lasers usage is associated with improvements in vulvovaginal symptoms, like dryness, itching, dyspareunia, dysuria, and bleeding, along with improved sexual function and better VHI scores.115–120 However, recent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) found no significant benefit of intravaginal lasers over placebo in menopausal women 121 and BC survivors. 122
Concerns regarding energy-based GSM treatments include the absence of long-term data, unclear guidelines, and high costs not typically covered by insurance. RF treatments are less studied than lasers. 112 Comprehensive RCTs are essential before recommending lasers for BC survivors. Until more evidence emerges, their use should be reserved for clinical trials, ensuring informed discussions with patients about potential risks and benefits. 12
Hormonal therapy
Estrogen promotes breast epithelial and cancer cell growth, whereas reduced estrogen levels or tissue responsiveness decreases BC or cancer recurrence. Consequently, many BC prevention and treatment approaches target reducing or countering existing estrogen levels.123–125 Reasonably, systemic and local estrogen treatments are debated or advised against for women with a BC history or at elevated BC risk. Nevertheless, if non-hormonal treatments are ineffective for vulvovaginal symptoms, low-dose local hormonal therapy, with proper counseling and risk-benefit analysis, might be an option. Women with lower recurrence risk, influenced by stage, grade, and lymphovascular invasion; with receptor-negative diseases, on tamoxifen over AIs; and with significant symptoms prioritizing QOL may be more suitable for local hormone therapy. 12
Systemic estrogen
Current consensus advises against systemic estrogens for women with a BC history or elevated risk, 11 given their association with increased BC onset or recurrence, especially in those with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) disease. 126 International guidelines advise against systemic hormonal therapy. Yet, for severe vasomotor symptoms not alleviated by non-hormonal methods, systemic estrogen could be considered, providing that decisions are made collaboratively with oncologists. 127
Topical estrogen
Topical estrogen therapy is highly effective for GSM, but its use in BC patients is debated due to potential systemic estrogen absorption, which could increase the risk of BC recurrence. 8 Low-dose vaginal estrogens alleviate genitourinary symptoms11,128 and enhance vaginal health metrics, including VMI and pH in BC survivors.105,129,130 They also improve sexual function per the FSFI. 130 Local estrogen treatments, while similarly effective, vary in systemic absorption rate, 14 generally staying within postmenopausal ranges. 131 Absorption depends on the estrogen type (Conjugated equine estrogen (CEE) > estradiol > estrone > estriol),79,131 product form, application area, and mucosa state. For example, creams, covering more vaginal area, absorb more than tablets or rings. Due to high systemic absorption, CEE cream is not recommended for BC patients.79,131 Estrogen absorption differs by application site: vulvar skin, vestibule, or the highly absorptive vaginal epithelium. Applying in the proximal third of the vagina is advised to avoid enhanced absorption. 132 The vaginal mucosa state (atrophic vs estrogenic) and assessment timing post-application also impact absorption rates. A thin, atrophic vagina is highly absorptive, and this diminishes when the epithelium thickens in response to estrogenization. 133
The safety of local estrogen therapy in BC survivors remains a topic of debate, with multiple prospective studies reporting increased blood hormone levels when used in conjunction with adjuvant endocrine treatment.134–136 The biological implications of systemic estrogen absorption differ depending on the type of adjuvant ET, which aims to lower estrogen levels. Tamoxifen functions as a SERM, competitively binding to ERs and blocking estrogen-driven tumor growth. Consequently, minor increases in systemic estrogen levels are unlikely to meaningfully stimulate tumor cells in tamoxifen-treated patients. 137 In contrast, AIs profoundly suppress systemic estrogen biosynthesis by halting androgen-to-estrogen conversion, leading to nearly absent estradiol levels. Therefore, in AI-treated patients with HR-positive BC, even small systemic increases in estradiol levels could theoretically restore sufficient estrogenic stimulation to impact residual tumor cells.8,12,102,127
This mechanistic distinction suggests that vaginal estrogen therapy may be safer in women treated with tamoxifen than in those receiving AIs.
Limited clinical data exist on the long-term safety of vaginal estrogen in BC patients and on the impact of concurrent low-dose vaginal estrogen on ET efficacy. As a result, many oncologists are hesitant to prescribe local estrogen therapy for BC survivors; a study indicates that approximately 70% abstain from such treatments, largely due to interference and recurrence concerns. 43 Presently, because of recurrence worries, a minority of BC survivors with GSM are prescribed vaginal estrogen, leading to GSM undertreatment in this population.138,139
Several studies have evaluated the systemic absorption of vaginal estrogen. While some research found that intravaginal estrogen did not significantly elevate serum estradiol levels, others detected brief transient increases.128,130,135,136,140,141 Despite these observations, serum estradiol concentrations generally remained within postmenopausal ranges. 131 Similarly, a year of vaginal estrogen use in menopausal women did not result in alterations of breast density or Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (Bi-RADS) scores, surrogate markers associated with BC risk. 142
Clinical outcomes data further clarify the safety profile. A nationwide target trial emulation 143 demonstrated that vaginal estrogen therapy was not associated with an increased risk of BC recurrence or mortality among survivors with HR-negative tumors or those treated with tamoxifen. However, a modestly increased risk of recurrence was observed among HR-positive survivors receiving AIs. 143 These findings are consistent with several observational and case-control studies spanning up to a decade, which similarly found no heightened BC recurrence risk overall, except in a subset of women using vaginal estrogen concurrently with adjuvant AI therapy.144,145 Most importantly, there was no elevated risk for BC mortality in patients using concurrent adjuvant AIs or tamoxifen.145,146
Taken together, the available evidence suggests that low-dose vaginal estrogen therapy may be considered relatively safe for BC survivors, particularly those treated with tamoxifen or those with HR-negative tumors. Greater caution is warranted for HR-positive survivors receiving AIs.
Although definitive RCT data on the long-term safety of vaginal hormone therapy in BC survivors are lacking, many guidelines and societies support low-dose vaginal estrogen for persistent GSM symptoms, even in patients on AIs, especially when non-hormonal treatments are insufficient.8,12,102,127,147
The use of vaginal estrogen is advised to be approached with caution, following shared decision-making between the patient, gynecologist, and oncologist, or by contemplating a switch from AIs adjuvant treatment to tamoxifen.8,12
Vaginal androgens
Androgen receptors have been identified in the vaginal mucosa, therefore, are gaining attention as a potential treatment for GSM in BC survivors. 148 Vaginal androgens can be an effective and safe alternative to estrogens in resolving vulvovaginal symptoms related to AIs therapy in BC survivors.12,56,128
Dehydroepiandrosterone
The FDA has approved intravaginal 0.5% (6.5 mg) dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) ovules (prasterone, Intrarosa) for treating dyspareunia due to vulvovaginal atrophy. DHEA may be converted to estrogen through aromatization, posing concerns for individuals with a history of BC.8,12 In two 12-week RCTs, 6.5-mg DHEA nightly improved vaginal cell maturation, pH, and dyspareunia secondary to atrophy relative to placebo. Adverse effects included vaginal discharge (5.71%) and abnormal pap tests (2.1%).149,150 A 52-week study found intravaginal DHEA enhanced all FSFI score sexual function domains. 151
In an RCT of 464 women with gynecologic cancer and BC survivors with moderate vaginal symptoms, 3.25- and 6.5-mg compounded vaginal DHEA were assessed against moisturizer over 12 weeks. Both treatments reduced symptoms, with 6.5-mg DHEA showing quicker relief by week 8 and improved sexual health per the FSFI. 152 Adverse effects were consistent across groups. Serum estradiol increases were observed in the 6.5 mg group not on AI therapy. Moreover, DHEA also raised DHEA-S and testosterone, remaining within postmenopausal ranges, correlating with improved vaginal cytology. 153 Without direct comparisons between vaginal DHEA and estrogen, a recommendation for BC survivors remains inconclusive.
Testosterone
Testosterone promotes vaginal epithelial proliferation and ameliorates vaginal atrophy symptoms in postmenopausal women. 154 In individuals on AIs, testosterone-to-estrogen conversion is inhibited, potentially allowing testosterone to alleviate atrophy without affecting AIs’ efficacy. Preliminary data suggest that vaginal testosterone can improve vulvovaginal atrophy, dyspareunia, and sexual dysfunction in AIs users.128,155–157
In a safety study using 150–300 µg daily testosterone propionate for genitourinary atrophy in 21 BC patients on AIs, no significant estrogen increase was observed after 4 weeks. 135 Conversely, in a trial with 69 postmenopausal women using a higher intravaginal testosterone dose (5000 µg, thrice weekly), 12% exhibited a sustained estrogen rise, implying that reduced testosterone dosing may be more optimal. 128
Longer-term studies on testosterone use are required, as most research spans only 4 weeks. Currently, using testosterone in women for this purpose is off-label. 8
SERMs—ospemifene
A newer medication for systemic use—the SERM Ospemifene—was recently reported to have a promising safety and efficacy profile in physiological menopause. In an RCT with over 1000 postmenopausal women, 12-week to 1-year Ospemifene use improved vaginal pH, tissue health, and reduced dyspareunia reports.158,159 Notable, while ospemifene has estrogenic effects on vaginal tissues and bone, it appears to act as an antagonist in breast tissue.160,161
Clinical studies suggest no elevated risk for BC incidence, recurrence, or breast-related safety concerns with Ospemifene use.158,161–165 However, due to limited study durations, its long-term effects remain unclear, leading to its debated use among healthcare providers. The FDA warns against its use in women with a history of BC, but in Europe, Ospemifene is approved for women with moderate to severe vulvovaginal atrophy with a history of BC who have completed all anti-estrogenic adjuvant treatments.8,12,166
Treatment guidelines
For BC survivors experiencing GSM symptoms, a personalized treatment approach is essential, taking into consideration aspects such as HR status, type of adjuvant therapy, disease stage, time since diagnosis, risk of relapse, symptom severity, impact on QOL, and patient preferences. 12 Navigating treatment choices for GSM in BC survivors presents complexities. A one-size-fits-all approach is not suitable for managing vulvovaginal symptoms associated with GSM. Instead, treatments should be tailored based on the underlying cause. For instance, if dyspareunia results from reduced lubrication or vaginal friction, the primary intervention should involve the use of lubricants during sexual activity, possibly complemented by daily moisturizers.12,100 Alternatively, if dyspareunia results from vestibular atrophy, local anesthesia gel before sexual intimacy should be offered first.94,95 PFPT with dilators should be offered as a first-line treatment option for dyspareunia due to narrowed introitus and/or loss of vaginal capacity. 17 Table 3 outlines the common GSM symptoms in BC survivors and our suggested treatment strategies based on the underlying mechanism in accordance with society’s guidelines.8,12,102,127,147
Table 3.
Targeted treatment recommendations for vulvovaginal symptoms in BC survivors.
| Main symptom | Mechanism/etiology | First-line treatment options | Second line |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vulva dryness/itching/burning | Atrophic changes and decreased blood flow | - Vulvar hygiene measures (Box 1) - Moisturizers/lubricants - PFPT and vibratory stimulation to enhance blood flow - Local anesthesia cream |
Topical hormonal therapy |
| Vaginal dryness/itching/burning | Atrophic changes: - Decreased blood flow - Thin, smooth, less elastic vaginal epithelium - Cervical atrophy and decreased secretions |
- Moisturizers/lubricants - PFPT and vibratory stimulation to enhance blood flow |
- Topical hormonal therapy - Laser treatment |
| Dyspareunia | Loss of vaginal elasticity: - Vaginal vault thinning, - Vaginal narrowing and shortening |
- PFPT - Dilators - Vibratory stimulation to enhance blood flow |
Topical hormonal therapy |
| Narrowing of vaginal introitus (including rigid hymenal ring) | - Manual therapy, PFPT - Dilators - Vibratory stimulation to enhance blood flow |
Perineoplasty | |
| Tender scar tissue (past vulvovaginal operations, episiotomy, etc.) | - Manual therapy for scar tissue - PFPT and vibratory stimulation to enhance blood flow - Local anesthesia |
Topical hormonal therapy and/or Perineoplasty |
|
| Vestibular atrophy + circumferential vestibular pain | - PFPT - Moisturizers/lubricants - Local anesthesia |
Topical hormonal therapy | |
| Hypertonic, tender pelvic floor muscles | - PFPT + local anesthesia - Dilator use - Vibratory stimulation to enhance blood flow |
Diazepam suppositories (10 mg) Botox injections (pelvic floor muscles) |
|
| Vaginal atrophy: - Decreased lubrication - Fragile vaginal walls - Friction induced vaginal discomfort |
- Moisturizers/lubricants - PFPT and vibratory stimulation to enhance blood flow |
Topical hormonal therapy |
BC, breast cancer; PFPT, pelvic floor physical therapy.
Furthermore, utilizing a systematic approach that takes into account the receptor status, type of adjuvant ET (AIs vs Tamoxifen), and its current or past usage can guide clinicians toward more effective treatment care. Our proposed therapeutic approach for GSM in BC survivors is depicted in Figure 1, reflecting societies recommendations.8,12,102,127 Briefly, data on the safety and efficacy of local hormone therapy for ER-negative BC survivors are limited. While reducing estrogen levels is not a primary adjuvant treatment for this group, local hormone therapy for GSM symptoms could be considered. However, the diverse nature of tumors means that some apparent receptor-negative cases might still possess ER-positive elements.167,168 Nevertheless, considering local topical low-dose hormone therapy is reasonable when the risk of recurrence is low and symptoms are troubling. 12
Figure 1.
General guidelines for GSM treatment in BC survivors.
BC, breast cancer; GSM, genitourinary syndrome of menopause.
Conversely, for patients with ER-positive BC, estrogen suppression is a vital aspect of treatment and prevention. 12 In this group, local hormone therapy should be considered only after non-hormonal treatments prove ineffective, and after consultation with oncologists. This decision must weigh potential risks, the likelihood of disease recurrence, and the intensity of vaginal symptoms. Using intravaginal estrogens in women taking tamoxifen, with blocked ERs, poses fewer concerns compared to women on AIs. In the latter, significantly reduced estrogen levels mean that any systemic uptake might counteract the therapeutic effectiveness of the AIs. 12
In women with metastatic BC, aspects like sexual health and GSM management are frequently overlooked by HCPs. Data to guide GSM treatment decisions for this group are lacking. However, considering local low-dose hormone therapy may be reasonable for those with severe symptoms and compromised QOL after evaluating the risks and benefits. The healthcare team should not underestimate the significance of QOL, comfort, and enhanced sexual function for these patients. As the lifespan of women with metastatic BC extends, further research into their needs becomes imperative. 12
Considerations for systemic therapy adjustment
For patients experiencing persistent and severe vulvovaginal symptoms despite optimal local therapy, adjusting systemic endocrine treatment may be a reasonable option. In postmenopausal women receiving AIs, which are associated with profound estrogen depletion, switching to tamoxifen may be considered if medically appropriate, as its partial estrogen agonist effects can be less detrimental to vulvovaginal health.26–29 Shared decision making with a frank discussion of the limitations and benefits of switching endocrine treatment is imperative, and flexibility with choice of ET may ultimately result in improved patient adherence and compliance. Additionally, emerging endocrine therapies, such as Lasofoxifene, a next-generation SERM, may have a more favorable impact on vulvovaginal symptoms, though data remain limited.169–171
Similarly, oral selective estrogen receptor degraders, such as elacestrant, are under investigation in early-stage HR+ BC, including in the adjuvant setting.172,173 These agents have demonstrated favorable overall tolerability, with nausea and hot flashes being the most common side effects, but their specific effects on vulvovaginal tissues have not yet been studied. In addition, novel endocrine therapies such as proteolysis-targeting chimeras and selective estrogen receptor covalent antagonists are being developed, although their impact on mucosal health remains unknown.174–177
Future research should prospectively evaluate the effects of novel endocrine therapies on vulvovaginal health to guide treatment decisions and improve QOL in patients with ER-positive BC.
Summary
Advancements in BC treatments have reduced mortality but can compromise QOL due to estrogen deprivation. It is crucial for clinicians managing BC survivors to understand the local and systemic side effects of ET that might hinder its use and adherence. A proactive approach is essential: clinicians should inform BC survivors about potential vulvar and vaginal changes tied to low estrogen and share information on safe, effective treatments. Emphasizing multi-disciplinary care is of utmost importance. Limited information exists on how new biological therapies, such as CDK4/6 inhibitors and immunotherapy, influence GSM. This highlights the need for more research on these patients. It is imperative to explore further GSM management, especially among women with metastatic disease. This review offers valuable insights and actionable guidelines to assist clinicians in addressing vulvovaginal health for BC survivors. By doing so, they can mitigate physical changes, alleviate GSM symptoms, enhance QOL, and ultimately encourage continued commitment to vital adjuvant treatment.
Acknowledgments
None.
Footnotes
ORCID iD: Maya Ram-Weiner
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8774-2845
Contributor Information
Maya Ram-Weiner, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hadassah University Medical Center, Mt. Scopus, 8 Sderot Churchill, Jerusalem 9112001, Israel Clalit Health Organization, Jerusalem, Israel.
Shani Paluch-Shimon, Sharett Institute of Oncology, Hadassah University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel; Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel.
Tanir M. Allweis, Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel Department of Breast Surgery, Hadassah Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.
Ahinoam Lev-Sagie, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hadassah University Medical Center, Mt. Scopus, Jerusalem, Israel; Clalit Health Organization, Jerusalem, Israel.
Declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate: Not applicable.
Consent for publication: Not applicable.
Author contributions: Maya Ram-Weiner: Conceptualization; Data curation; Formal analysis; Writing – original draft; Writing – review & editing.
Shani Paluch-Shimon: Methodology; Writing – review & editing.
Tanir M. Allweis: Investigation; Writing – review & editing.
Ahinoam Lev-Sagie: Conceptualization; Methodology; Supervision; Writing – review & editing.
Funding: The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
Availability of data and materials: Not applicable.
References
- 1. Grogan Fleege NM, Cobain EF. Breast cancer management in 2021: a primer for the obstetrics and gynecology. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2022; 82: 30–45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Dafni U, Tsourti Z, Alatsathianos I. Breast cancer statistics in the European Union: incidence and survival across European countries. Breast Care 2019; 14: 344–353. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Rock CL, Thomson CA, Sullivan KR, et al. American Cancer Society nutrition and physical activity guideline for cancer survivors. CA Cancer J Clin 2022; 72: 230–262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Runowicz CD, Leach CR, Henry NL, et al. American cancer society/American society of clinical oncology breast cancer survivorship care guideline. CA Cancer J Clin 2016; 66: 43–73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE, et al. Cancer statistics, 2022. CA Cancer J Clin 2022; 72: 7–33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Ganz PA. Survivorship: adult cancer survivors. Prim Care 2009; 36: 721–741. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Sussman TA, Kruse ML, Thacker HL, et al. Managing genitourinary syndrome of menopause in breast cancer survivors receiving endocrine therapy. J Oncol Pract 2019; 15: 363–370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Treatment of urogenital symptoms in individuals with a history of estrogen-dependent breast cancer: clinical consensus. Obstet Gynecol 2021; 138: 950–960. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Krishnamurthy J, Tandra PK. Genitourinary syndrome of menopause in breast cancer survivors: a common complication with effective treatment strategies. J Oncol Pract 2019; 15: 373–374. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Phillips NA, Bachmann GA. The genitourinary syndrome of menopause. Menopause 2021; 28: 579–588. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. The NAMS 2020 GSM Position Statement Editorial Panel; Faubion SS, Kingsberg SA, Clark AL, et al. The 2020 genitourinary syndrome of menopause position statement of the North American Menopause Society. Menopause 2020; 27: 976–992. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Faubion SS, Larkin LC, Stuenkel CA, et al. Consensus recommendations: management of genitourinary syndrome of menopause in women with or at high risk for breast cancer: consensus recommendations from the North American Menopause Society and the International Society for the Study of Women’s Sexual Health. Menopause 2018; 25: 596–608. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Kingston A. Vulval disease in the postmenopausal patient: a guide to current management. Menopause Int 2010; 16: 117–120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Lester J, Pahouja G, Andersen B, et al. Atrophic vaginitis in breast cancer survivors: a difficult survivorship issue. J Pers Med 2015; 5: 50–66. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Conde DM, Pinto-Neto AM, Cabello C, et al. Menopause symptoms and quality of life in women aged 45 to 65 years with and without breast cancer. Menopause 2005; 12: 436–443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Biglia N, Cozzarella M, Cacciari F, et al. Menopause after breast cancer: a survey on breast cancer survivors. Maturitas 2003; 45: 29–38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Falk SJ, Bober S. Vaginal health during breast cancer treatment. Curr Oncol Rep 2016; 18: 32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Kyvernitakis I, Ziller V, Hars O, et al. Prevalence of menopausal symptoms and their influence on adherence in women with breast cancer. Climacteric 2014; 17: 252–259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Cella D, Fallowfield LJ. Recognition and management of treatment-related side effects for breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant endocrine therapy. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2008; 107: 167–180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Friese CR, Pini TM, Li Y, et al. Adjuvant endocrine therapy initiation and persistence in a diverse sample of patients with breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2013; 138: 931–939. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Saha P, Regan MM, Pagani O, et al. Treatment efficacy, adherence, and quality of life among women younger than 35 years in the international breast cancer study group TEXT and SOFT adjuvant endocrine therapy trials. J Clin Oncol 2017; 35: 3113–3122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Stuenkel CA, Davis SR, Gompel A, et al. Treatment of symptoms of the menopause: an endocrine society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2015; 100: 3975–4011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. DeSantis CE, Ma J, Gaudet MM, et al. Breast cancer statistics, 2019. CA Cancer J Clin 2019; 69: 438–451. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Pagani O, Regan MM, Walley BA, et al. Adjuvant exemestane with ovarian suppression in premenopausal breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2014; 371: 107–118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Francis PA, Pagani O, Fleming GF, et al. Tailoring adjuvant endocrine therapy for premenopausal breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2018; 379: 122–137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Friedrich M, Mink D, Villena-Heinsen C, et al. The influence of tamoxifen on the maturation index of vaginal epithelium. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol 1998; 25: 121–124. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Love RR, Kurtycz DF, Dumesic DA, et al. The effects of tamoxifen on the vaginal epithelium in postmenopausal women. J Womens Health Gend Based Med 2000; 9: 559–563. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Lev-Sagie A. Vulvar and vaginal atrophy: physiology, clinical presentation, and treatment considerations. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2015; 58: 476–491. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Baumgart J, Nilsson K, Stavreus-Evers A, et al. Urogenital disorders in women with adjuvant endocrine therapy after early breast cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011; 204: 26.e1–26.e7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Morales L, Neven P, Timmerman D, et al. Acute effects of tamoxifen and third-generation aromatase inhibitors on menopausal symptoms of breast cancer patients. Anticancer Drugs 2004; 15: 753–760. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Jakesz R, Jonat W, Gnant M, et al. Switching of postmenopausal women with endocrine-responsive early breast cancer to anastrozole after 2 years’ adjuvant tamoxifen: combined results of ABCSG trial 8 and ARNO 95 trial. Lancet 2005; 366: 455–462. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Jin H, Tu D, Zhao N, et al. Longer-term outcomes of letrozole versus placebo after 5 years of tamoxifen in the NCIC CTG MA.17 trial: analyses adjusting for treatment crossover. J Clin Oncol 2012; 30: 718–721. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Bradley R, Burrett J, Clarke M, et al. Aromatase inhibitors versus tamoxifen in early breast cancer: patient-level meta-analysis of the randomised trials. Lancet 2015; 386: 1341–1352. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Lee CI, Goodwin A, Wilcken N. Fulvestrant for hormone-sensitive metastatic breast cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017; 2017: CD011093. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Goodwin PJ, Ennis M, Pritchard KI, et al. Risk of menopause during the first year after breast cancer diagnosis. J Clin Oncol 1999; 17: 2365–2370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Minton SE, Munster PN. Chemotherapy-induced amenorrhea and fertility in women undergoing adjuvant treatment for breast cancer. Cancer Control 2002; 9: 466–472. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Howell A, Cuzick J, Baum M, et al.; ATAC Trialists’ Group. Results of the ATAC (arimidex, tamoxifen, alone or in combination) trial after completion of 5 years’ adjuvant treatment for breast cancer. Lancet 2005; 365: 60–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. López DML. Management of genitourinary syndrome of menopause in breast cancer survivors: an update. World J Clin Oncol 2022; 13: 71–100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Baumgart J, Nilsson K, Evers AS, et al. Sexual dysfunction in women on adjuvant endocrine therapy after breast cancer. Menopause 2013; 20: 162–168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Calleja-Agius J, Brincat MP. The urogenital system and the menopause. Climacteric 2015; 18(Suppl. 1): 18–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Portman DJ, Gass MLS, Kingsberg S, et al. Genitourinary syndrome of menopause: new terminology for vulvovaginal atrophy from the international society for the study of women’s sexual health and the North American Menopause Society. Menopause 2014; 21: 1063–1068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Shapiro CL, Manola J, Leboff M. Ovarian failure after adjuvant chemotherapy is associated with rapid bone loss in women with early-stage breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2001; 19: 3306–3311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Biglia N, Bounous VE, D’Alonzo M, et al. Vaginal atrophy in breast cancer survivors: attitude and approaches among oncologists. Clin Breast Cancer 2017; 17: 611–617. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Daly B, Olopade OI, Hou N, et al. Evaluation of the quality of adjuvant endocrine therapy delivery for breast cancer care in the United States. JAMA Oncol 2017; 3: 928–935. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Goss PE, Ingle JN, Pritchard KI, et al. Extending aromatase-inhibitor adjuvant therapy to 10 years. N Engl J Med 2016; 375: 209–219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Gupta P, Sturdee DW, Palin SL, et al. Menopausal symptoms in women treated for breast cancer: the prevalence and severity of symptoms and their perceived effects on quality of life. Climacteric 2006; 9: 49–58. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Marino JL, Saunders CM, Emery LI, et al. Nature and severity of menopausal symptoms and their impact on quality of life and sexual function in cancer survivors compared with women without a cancer history. Menopause 2014; 21: 267–274. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Knobf MT. The influence of endocrine effects of adjuvant therapy on quality of life outcomes in younger breast cancer survivors. Oncologist 2006; 11: 96–110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Taylor CE, Meisel JL. Management of breast cancer therapy-related sexual dysfunction. Oncology (United States) 2017; 31: 726–729. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Horwitz EM, Hanlon AL, Pinover WH, et al. Impact of surgery and chemotherapy on the quality of life of younger women with breast carcinoma: a prospective study. Cancer 2001; 92: 1288–1298. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Flynn KE, Reese JB, Jeffery DD, et al. Patient experiences with communication about sex during and after treatment for cancer. Psychooncology 2012; 21: 594–601. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Hordern AJ, Street AF. Communicating about patient sexuality and intimacy after cancer: mismatched expectations and unmet needs. Med J Aust 2007; 186: 224–227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Kingsberg S, Larkin L. Shining the light on genitourinary syndrome of menopause in survivors of breast cancer. Menopause 2017; 24: 1336–1337. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Nappi RE, Kokot-Kierepa M. Vaginal health: insights, views & attitudes (VIVA)—results from an international survey. Climacteric 2012; 15: 36–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Nappi RE, Palacios S, Bruyniks N, et al. The burden of vulvovaginal atrophy on women’s daily living: Implications on quality of life from a face-to-face real-life survey. Menopause 2019; 26: 485–491. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Nappi RE, Kokot-Kierepa M. Women’s voices in the menopause: results from an international survey on vaginal atrophy. Maturitas 2010; 67: 233–238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Fallowfield L, Cella D, Cuzick J, et al. Quality of life of postmenopausal women in the arimidex, tamoxifen, alone or in combination (ATAC) adjuvant breast cancer trial. J Clin Oncol 2004; 22: 4261–4271. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Ram-Weiner M, Hayman-Mendelson A, Allouche-Kam H, et al. Postpartum dyspareunia: clinical evaluation, causes, and treatment outcomes. J Sex Med 2023; 20: 324–331. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Ibrahim Nadia Abdul-Aziz. Vaginal pH as a marker for bacterial pathogens and menopausal status. Indian J Public Health Res Dev 2020; 11: 2705. [Google Scholar]
- 60. Roy S, Caillouette JC, Roy T, et al. Vaginal pH is similar to follicle-stimulating hormone for menopause diagnosis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 190: 1272–1277. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Mension E, Alonso I, Tortajada M, et al. Genitourinary syndrome of menopause assessment tools. J Midlife Health 2021; 12: 99–102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Rosen R, Brown C, Heiman J, et al. The female sexual function index (FSFI): a multidimensional self-report instrument for the assessment of female sexual function. J Sex Marital Ther 2000; 26: 191–208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Baser RE, Li Y, Carter J. Psychometric validation of the female sexual function index (FSFI) in cancer survivors. Cancer 2012; 118: 4606–4618. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Pérez-López FR, Vieira-Baptista P, Phillips N, et al. Clinical manifestations and evaluation of postmenopausal vulvovaginal atrophy. Gynecol Endocrinol 2021; 37: 740–745. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Eaton AA, Baser RE, Seidel B, et al. Validation of clinical tools for vaginal and vulvar symptom assessment in cancer patients and survivors. J Sex Med 2017; 14: 144–151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Bachmann G. Urogenital ageing: an old problem newly recognized. Maturitas 1995; 22(Suppl.): S1–S55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Weber MA, Limpens J, Roovers JPWR. Assessment of vaginal atrophy: a review. Int Urogynecol J 2015; 26: 15–28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Pieralli A, Fallani MG, Becorpi A, et al. Fractional CO2 laser for vulvovaginal atrophy (VVA) dyspareunia relief in breast cancer survivors. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2016; 294: 841–846. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Vieira-Baptista P, Grincevicˇiene Š, Oliveira C, et al. The international society for the study of vulvovaginal disease vaginal wet mount microscopy guidelines: how to perform, applications, and interpretation. J Low Genit Tract Dis 2021; 25: 172–180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Gabrieli D, Suissa-Cohen Y, Jaber S, et al. “Modified Schirmer test” as an objective measurement for vaginal dryness: a prospective cohort study. Diagnostics 2022; 12: 574. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. Cook ED, Iglehart EI, Baum G, et al. Missing documentation in breast cancer survivors: genitourinary syndrome of menopause. Menopause 2017; 24: 1360–1364. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72. Elwyn G, Frosch D, Thomson R, et al. Shared decision making: a model for clinical practice. J Gen Intern Med 2012; 27: 1361–1367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73. Makoul G, Clayman ML. An integrative model of shared decision making in medical encounters. Patient Educ Couns 2006; 60: 301–312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ Committee on Practice Bulletins—Gynecology. Diagnosis and management of vulvar skin disorders: ACOG Practice Bulletin, Number 224. Obstet Gynecol 2020; 136: e1–e14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75. Corazza M, Toni G, Zedde P, et al. Contact dermatitis of the vulva. Allergies 2021; 1(4): 206–215. [Google Scholar]
- 76. Palacios S, Mejía A, Neyro JL. Treatment of the genitourinary syndrome of menopause. Climacteric 2015; 18(Suppl. 1): 23–29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77. Tähtinen RM, Auvinen A, Cartwright R, et al. Smoking and bladder symptoms in women. Obstet Gynecol 2011; 118: 643–648. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78. Karamanidis D, Tamiolakis D, Koutsougeras G, et al. Cigarette smoking and the degree of maturation of the vaginal squamous epithelium in postmenopausal women. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol 2001; 28: 274–276. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79. Stika CS. Atrophic vaginitis. Dermatol Ther 2010; 23: 514–522. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80. Kalogeraki A, Tamiolakis D, Relakis K, et al. Cigarette smoking and vaginal atrophy in postmenopausal women. In Vivo (Brooklyn) 1996; 10: 597–600. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81. Altman D, Melin I, Falconer C, et al. Weight reduction as treatment of urinary incontinence. Lakartidningen 2009; 106: 1826–1828. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82. Sousa MS, Peate M, Jarvis S, et al. A clinical guide to the management of genitourinary symptoms in breast cancer survivors on endocrine therapy. Ther Adv Med Oncol 2017; 9: 269–285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83. Park HY, Lee B-J, Kim J-H, et al. Rapid improvement of depression and quality of life with escitalopram treatment in outpatients with breast cancer: a 12-week, open-label prospective trial. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 2012; 36: 318–323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84. Falk SJ, Bober S. Vaginal health during breast cancer treatment. Curr Oncol Rep 2016; 18: 32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85. Pruthi S, Simon JA, Early AP. Current overview of the management of urogenital atrophy in women with breast cancer. Breast J 2011; 17: 403–408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86. Schroder M, Mell LK, Hurteau JA, et al. Clitoral therapy device for treatment of sexual dysfunction in irradiated cervical cancer patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2005; 61: 1078–1086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87. Carter J, Goldfrank D, Schover LR. Simple strategies for vaginal health promotion in cancer survivors. J Sex Med 2011; 8: 549–559. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88. Faubion SS, Shuster LT, Bharucha AE. Recognition and management of nonrelaxing pelvic floor dysfunction. Mayo Clin Proc 2012; 87: 187–193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89. Keshavarzi Z, Janghorban R, Alipour S, et al. The effect of vitamin D and E vaginal suppositories on tamoxifen-induced vaginal atrophy in women with breast cancer. Support Care Cancer 2019; 27: 1325–1334. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90. Lee A, Lee MR, Lee HH, et al. Vitamin D proliferates vaginal epithelium through RhoA expression in postmenopausal atrophic vagina tissue. Mol Cells 2017; 40: 677–684. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91. Costantino D, Guaraldi C. Effectiveness and safety of vaginal suppositories for the treatment of the vaginal atrophy in postmenopausal women: an open, non-controlled clinical trial. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2008; 12: 411–416. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92. Nappi RE, Martella S, Albani F, et al. Hyaluronic acid: a valid therapeutic option for early management of genitourinary syndrome of menopause in cancer survivors? Healthcare (Switzerland) 2022; 10: 1528. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93. Carter J, Baser RE, Goldfrank DJ, et al. A single-arm, prospective trial investigating the effectiveness of a non-hormonal vaginal moisturizer containing hyaluronic acid in postmenopausal cancer survivors. Support Care Cancer 2021; 29: 311–322. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94. Goetsch MF, Lim JY, Caughey AB. A practical solution for dyspareunia in breast cancer survivors: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol 2015; 33: 3394–3400. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95. Goetsch MF, Lim JY, Caughey AB. Locating pain in breast cancer survivors experiencing dyspareunia: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2014; 123: 1231–1236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96. Edwards D, Panay N. Treating vulvovaginal atrophy/genitourinary syndrome of menopause: how important is vaginal lubricant and moisturizer composition? Climacteric 2016; 19: 151–161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97. Sassarini J, Perera M, Spowart K, et al. Managing vulvovaginal atrophy after breast cancer. Post Reprod Health 2018; 24(4): 163–165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98. Faubion SS, Larkin LC, Stuenkel CA, et al. Management of genitourinary syndrome of menopause in women with or at high risk for breast cancer: Consensus recommendations from the North American Menopause Society and the International Society for the Study of Women’s Sexual Health. Menopause 2018; 25: 596–608. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99. Patterson J, Millheiser L, Krychman ML. Moisturizers, lubricants, and vulvar hygiene products: issues, answers, and clinical implications. Curr Sex Health Rep 2016; 8: 213–221. [Google Scholar]
- 100. Potter N, Panay N. Vaginal lubricants and moisturizers: a review into use, efficacy, and safety. Climacteric 2021; 24: 19–24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101. Willhite LA, O’Connell MB. Urogenital atrophy: prevention and treatment. Pharmacotherapy 2001; 21: 464–480. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102. Pérez-López FR, Phillips N, Vieira-Baptista P, et al. Management of postmenopausal vulvovaginal atrophy: recommendations of the International Society for the Study of Vulvovaginal Disease. Gynecol Endocrinol 2021; 37: 746–752. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103. Kim YH, Park S, Lee M, et al. Effect of a pH-balanced vaginal gel on dyspareunia and sexual function in breast cancer survivors who were premenopausal at diagnosis: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2017; 129: 870–876. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104. Lee Y-K, Chung HH, Kim JW, et al. Vaginal pH-balanced gel for the control of atrophic vaginitis among breast cancer survivors: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2011; 117: 922–927. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105. Biglia N, Peano E, Sgandurra P, et al. Low-dose vaginal estrogens or vaginal moisturizer in breast cancer survivors with urogenital atrophy: a preliminary study. Gynecol Endocrinol 2010; 26: 404–412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106. Mitchell CM, Reed SD, Diem S, et al. Efficacy of vaginal estradiol or vaginal moisturizer vs placebo for treating postmenopausal vulvovaginal symptoms a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med 2018; 178: 681–690. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107. Bygdeman M, Swahn ML. Replens versus dienoestrol cream in the symptomatic treatment of vaginal atrophy in postmenopausal women. Maturitas 1996; 23: 259–263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108. Nachtigall LE. Comparative study: replens versus local estrogen in menopausal women. Fertil Steril 1994; 61: 178–180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109. Kollberg KS, Waldenström AC, Bergmark K, et al. Reduced vaginal elasticity, reduced lubrication, and deep and superficial dyspareunia in irradiated gynecological cancer survivors. Acta Oncol (Madr) 2015; 54: 772–779. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110. Capobianco G, Donolo E, Borghero G, et al. Effects of intravaginal estriol and pelvic floor rehabilitation on urogenital aging in postmenopausal women. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2012; 285: 397–403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111. Karcher C, Sadick N. Vaginal rejuvenation using energy-based devices. Int J Womens Dermatol 2016; 2: 85–88. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112. Sarmento ACA, Lírio JF, Medeiros KS, et al. Physical methods for the treatment of genitourinary syndrome of menopause: a systematic review. Int J Gynecol Obstet 2021; 153: 200–219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113. Salvatore S, Athanasiou S, Candiani M. The use of pulsed CO2 lasers for the treatment of vulvovaginal atrophy. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2015; 27: 504–508. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114. Sokol ER, Karram MM. Use of a novel fractional CO2 laser for the treatment of genitourinary syndrome of menopause: 1-year outcomes. Menopause 2017; 24: 810–814. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115. Salvatore S, Nappi RE, Casiraghi A, et al. Microablative fractional CO2 laser for vulvovaginal atrophy in women with a history of breast cancer: a pilot study at 4-week follow-up. Clin Breast Cancer 2021; 21: e539–e546. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116. Arêas F, Valadares ALR, Conde DM, et al. The effect of vaginal erbium laser treatment on sexual function and vaginal health in women with a history of breast cancer and symptoms of the genitourinary syndrome of menopause: a prospective study. Menopause 2019; 26: 1052–1058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117. Pagano T, De Rosa P, Vallone R, et al. Fractional microablative CO2 laser for vulvovaginal atrophy in women treated with chemotherapy and/or hormonal therapy for breast cancer: a retrospective study. Menopause 2016; 23: 1108–1113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118. Quick AM, Zvinovski F, Hudson C, et al. Patient-reported sexual function of breast cancer survivors with genitourinary syndrome of menopause after fractional CO2 laser therapy. Menopause 2021; 28: 642–649. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119. Mothes AR, Runnebaum M, Runnebaum IB. Ablative dual-phase Erbium:YAG laser treatment of atrophy-related vaginal symptoms in post-menopausal breast cancer survivors omitting hormonal treatment. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2018; 144: 955–960. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120. Quick AM, Zvinovski F, Hudson C, et al. Fractional CO2 laser therapy for genitourinary syndrome of menopause for breast cancer survivors. Support Care Cancer 2020; 28: 3669–3677. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121. Li FG, Maheux-Lacroix S, Deans R, et al. Effect of fractional carbon dioxide laser vs sham treatment on symptom severity in women with postmenopausal vaginal symptoms: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2021; 326: 1381–1389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122. Mension E, Alonso I, Anglès-Acedo S, et al. Effect of fractional carbon dioxide vs sham laser on sexual function in survivors of breast cancer receiving aromatase inhibitors for genitourinary syndrome of menopause: the LIGHT randomized clinical trial. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6: e2255697. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123. Goss PE, Ingle JN, Alés-Martínez JE, et al. Exemestane for breast-cancer prevention in postmenopausal women. N Engl J Med 2011; 364: 2381–2391. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124. Cuzick J, Sestak I, Bonanni B, et al. Selective oestrogen receptor modulators in prevention of breast cancer: an updated meta-analysis of individual participant data. Lancet 2013; 381: 1827–1834. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125. Kotsopoulos J, Huzarski T, Gronwald J, et al.; Hereditary Breast Cancer Clinical Study Group. Bilateral oophorectomy and breast cancer risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. J Natl Cancer Inst 2017; 109: djw177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126. Poggio F, Del Mastro L, Bruzzone M, et al. Safety of systemic hormone replacement therapy in breast cancer survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2022; 191: 269–275. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127. Faubion SS, Crandall CJ, Davis L, et al. The 2022 hormone therapy position statement of The North American Menopause Society. Menopause 2022; 29: 767–794. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128. Melisko ME, Goldman ME, Hwang J. Erratum: vaginal testosterone cream vs estradiol vaginal ring for vaginal dryness or decreased libido in women receiving aromatase inhibitors for early-stage breast cancer: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol 2017; 3(3), 6: 313–319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129. Mazzarello S, Hutton B, Ibrahim MFK, et al. Management of urogenital atrophy in breast cancer patients: a systematic review of available evidence from randomized trials. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2015; 152: 1–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130. Hirschberg AL, Sánchez-Rovira P, Presa-Lorite J, et al. Efficacy and safety of ultra-low dose 0.005% estriol vaginal gel for the treatment of vulvovaginal atrophy in postmenopausal women with early breast cancer treated with nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitors: a phase II, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Menopause 2020; 27: 526–534. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131. Santen RJ. Vaginal administration of estradiol: effects of dose, preparation and timing on plasma estradiol levels. Climacteric 2015; 18: 121–134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132. Cicinelli E, De Ziegler D, Morgese S, et al. “First uterine pass effect” is observed when estradiol is placed in the upper but not lower third of the vagina. Fertil Steril 2004; 81: 1414–1416. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133. Eugster-Hausmann M, Waitzinger J, Lehnick D. Minimized estradiol absorption with ultra-low-dose 10 μg 17 β-estradiol vaginal tablets. Climacteric 2010; 13: 219–227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134. Pfeiler G, Glatz C, Königsberg R, et al. Vaginal estriol to overcome side-effects of aromatase inhibitors in breast cancer patients. Climacteric 2011; 14: 339–344. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135. Wills S, Ravipati A, Venuturumilli P, et al. Effects of vaginal estrogens on serum estradiol levels in postmenopausal breast cancer survivors and women at risk of breast cancer taking an aromatase inhibitor or a selective estrogen receptor modulator. J Oncol Pract 2012; 8: 144–148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136. Kendall A, Dowsett M, Folkerd E, et al. Caution: vaginal estradiol appears to be contraindicated in postmenopausal women on adjuvant aromatase inhibitors. Ann Oncol 2006; 17: 584–587. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137. Ponzone R, Biglia N, Jacomuzzi ME, et al. Vaginal oestrogen therapy after breast cancer: is it safe? Eur J Cancer 2005; 41: 2673–2681. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138. Mension E, Alonso I, Castelo-Branco C. Genitourinary syndrome of menopause: current treatment options in breast cancer survivors—systematic review. Maturitas 2021; 143: 47–58. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139. Kingsberg SA, Larkin L, Krychman M, et al. WISDOM survey: attitudes and behaviors of physicians toward vulvar and vaginal atrophy (VVA) treatment in women including those with breast cancer history. Menopause 2019; 26: 124–131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140. Streff A, Chu-Pilli M, Stopeck A, et al. Changes in serum estradiol levels with Estring in postmenopausal women with breast cancer treated with aromatase inhibitors. Support Care Cancer 2021; 29: 187–191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141. Pavlović RT, Janković SM, Milovanović JR, et al. The safety of local hormonal treatment for vulvovaginal atrophy in women with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer who are on adjuvant aromatase inhibitor therapy: meta-analysis. Clin Breast Cancer 2019; 19: e731–e740. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142. Zuo SW, Wu H, Shen W. Vaginal estrogen and mammogram results: case series and review of literature on treatment of genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM) in breast cancer survivors. Menopause 2018; 25: 828–836. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143. Dumas E, Hamy-Petit A-S, Gougis P, et al. 268MO Safety of vaginal estrogen therapy after early-stage breast cancer: a nationwide population-based target trial emulation. ESMO Open 2024; 9: 103327. [Google Scholar]
- 144. Agrawal P, Singh SM, Able C, et al. Safety of vaginal estrogen therapy for genitourinary syndrome of menopause in women with a history of breast cancer. Obstet Gynecol 2023; 142: 660–668. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145. Cold S, Cold F, Jensen MB, et al. Systemic or vaginal hormone therapy after early breast cancer: a Danish observational cohort study. J Natl Cancer Inst 2022; 114: 1347–1354. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146. Sund M, Garmo H, Andersson A, et al. Estrogen therapy after breast cancer diagnosis and breast cancer mortality risk. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2023; 198: 361–368. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147. Paluch-Shimon S, Cardoso F, Partridge AH, et al. ESO–ESMO fifth international consensus guidelines for breast cancer in young women (BCY5). Ann Oncol 2022; 33: 1097–1118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148. Berger L, El-Alfy M, Labrie F. Effects of intravaginal dehydroepiandrosterone on vaginal histomorphology, sex steroid receptor expression and cell proliferation in the rat. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 2008; 109: 67–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 149. Labrie F, Archer DF, Koltun W, et al. Efficacy of intravaginal dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) on moderate to severe dyspareunia and vaginal dryness, symptoms of vulvovaginal atrophy, and of the genitourinary syndrome of menopause. Menopause 2018; 25: 1339–1353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 150. Archer DF, Labrie F, Bouchard C, et al.; VVA Prasterone Group. Treatment of pain at sexual activity (dyspareunia) with intravaginal dehydroepiandrosterone (prasterone). Menopause 2015; 22: 950–963. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 151. Bouchard C, Labrie F, DeRogatis L, et al. Effect of intravaginal dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) on the female sexual function in postmenopausal women: ERC-230 open-label study. Horm Mol Biol Clin Investig 2016; 25: 181–190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 152. Barton DL, Sloan JA, Shuster LT, et al. Evaluating the efficacy of vaginal dehydroepiandosterone for vaginal symptoms in postmenopausal cancer survivors: NCCTG N10C1 (Alliance). Support Care Cancer 2018; 26: 643–650. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 153. Barton DL, Shuster LT, Dockter T, et al. Systemic and local effects of vaginal dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA): NCCTG N10C1 (Alliance). Support Care Cancer 2018; 26: 1335–1343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 154. Fernandes T, Costa-Paiva LH, Pedro AO, et al. Efficacy of vaginally applied estrogen, testosterone, or polyacrylic acid on vaginal atrophy: a randomized controlled trial. Menopause 2016; 23: 792–798. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 155. Bell RJ, Rizvi F, Islam RM, et al. A systematic review of intravaginal testosterone for the treatment of vulvovaginal atrophy. Menopause 2018; 25: 704–709. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 156. Lemke EA, Madsen LT, Dains JE. Vaginal testosterone for management of aromatase inhibitor-related sexual dysfunction: an integrative review. Oncol Nurs Forum 2017; 44: 296–301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 157. Davis SR, Robinson PJ, Jane F, et al. Intravaginal testosterone improves sexual satisfaction and vaginal symptoms associated with aromatase inhibitors. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2018; 103: 4146–4154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 158. Di Donato V, Schiavi MC, Iacobelli V, et al. Ospemifene for the treatment of vulvar and vaginal atrophy: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. Part II: evaluation of tolerability and safety. Maturitas 2019; 121: 93–100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 159. Archer DF, Goldstein SR, Simon JA, et al. Efficacy and safety of ospemifene in postmenopausal women with moderate-to-severe vaginal dryness: a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial. Menopause 2019; 26: 611–621. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 160. Soe LH, Wurz GT, Kao CJ, et al. Ospemifene for the treatment of dyspareunia associated with vulvar and vaginal atrophy: potential benefits in bone and breast. Int J Womens Health 2013; 5: 605–611. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 161. Eigeliene N, Kangas L, Hellmer C, et al. Effects of ospemifene, a novel selective estrogen-receptor modulator, on human breast tissue ex vivo. Menopause 2016; 23: 719–730. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 162. Kangas L, Härkönen P, Väänänen K, et al. Effects of ospemifene on breast tissue morphology and proliferation: A comparative study versus other selective estrogen receptor modulators in ovariectomized rats. Horm Metab Res 2014; 46: 328–332. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 163. Simon J, Portman D, Mabey RG. Long-term safety of ospemifene (52-week extension) in the treatment of vulvar and vaginal atrophy in hysterectomized postmenopausal women. Maturitas 2014; 77: 274–281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 164. Del Pup L. Ospemifene: a safe treatment of vaginal atrophy. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2016; 20: 3934–3944. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 165. Cai B, Simon J, Villa P, et al. No increase in incidence or risk of recurrence of breast cancer in ospemifene-treated patients with vulvovaginal atrophy (VVA). Maturitas 2020; 142: 38–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 166. CHMP. Annex I. Summary of product characteristics, https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/product-information/senshio-epar-product-information_en.pdf (n.d., accessed 12 June 2025).
- 167. Amir E, Clemons M, Purdie CA, et al. Tissue confirmation of disease recurrence in breast cancer patients: pooled analysis of multi-centre, multi-disciplinary prospective studies. Cancer Treat Rev 2012; 38: 708–714. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 168. Khasraw M, Brogi E, Seidman AD. The need to examine metastatic tissue at the time of progression of breast cancer: is re-biopsy a necessity or a luxury? Curr Oncol Rep 2011; 13: 17–25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 169. Goldfarb SB, Sammons SL, Meisel JL, et al. (114) Vaginal/vulvar symptoms with lasofoxifene versus fulvestrant in ESR1-mutated, ER+/HER2− metastatic breast cancer patients. J Sex Med 2023; 20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 170. Lewiecki EM. Lasofoxifene for the prevention and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Ther Clin Risk Manag 2009; 5: 817–827. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 171. Goldfarb SB, Sammons SL, Meisel JL, et al. Effects of lasofoxifene versus fulvestrant on vaginal and vulvar symptoms in patients with ESR1-mutated, ER+/HER2−, metastatic breast cancer from the ELAINE 1 study. Clin Breast Cancer 2025; 25: 261–267. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 172. Neupane N, Bawek S, Gurusinghe S, et al. Oral SERD, a novel endocrine therapy for estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16: 619. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 173. Bidard FC, Kaklamani VG, Neven P, et al. Elacestrant (oral selective estrogen receptor degrader) versus standard endocrine therapy for estrogen receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer: results from the randomized phase III EMERALD trial. J Clin Oncol 2022; 40: 3246–3256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 174. Hu J, Hu B, Wang M, et al. Discovery of ERD-308 as a highly potent proteolysis targeting chimera (PROTAC) degrader of estrogen receptor (ER). J Med Chem 2019; 62(3): 1420–1442. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 175. Wang Y, Min J, Deng X, et al. Discovery of novel covalent selective estrogen receptor degraders against endocrine-resistant breast cancer. Acta Pharm Sin B 2023; 13: 4963–4982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 176. Nalawansha DA, Crews CM. PROTACs: an emerging therapeutic modality in precision medicine. Cell Chem Biol 2020; 27: 998–1014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 177. Furman C, Puyang X, Zhang Z, et al. Covalent ERa antagonist H3B-6545 demonstrates encouraging preclinical activity in therapy-resistant breast cancer. Mol Cancer Ther 2022; 21: 890–902. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

