Skip to main content
. 2025 Jun 25;15(6):2843–2854. doi: 10.62347/ANQD9699

Table 4.

Logistic regression model for predictors of distant site failure

Variable Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis


ORs 95% CI P value ORs 95% CI P value
EGFR mutation type (L858R vs. 19del) 0.662 (0.268, 1.634) 0.371
Age (≥ 65 vs. < 65) 0.515 (0.193, 1.372) 0.184 0.427 (0.147, 1.238) 0.117
Sex (female vs. male) 0.379 (0.151, 0.954) 0.039 0.548 (0.157, 1.917) 0.347
Smoking history (yes vs. no) 2.404 (0.816, 7.084) 0.112 1.422 (0.315, 6.416) 0.647
Best response evaluation (PR vs. SD) 1.355 (0.477, 3.850) 0.568
Best response evaluation (PD vs. SD) 1.286 (0.347, 4.764) 0.707
Initial Oligometastatic status (yes vs. no) 1.592 (0.642, 3.947) 0.316
Initial CNS metastasis (yes vs. no) 0.186 (0.058, 0.590) 0.004 0.191 (0.058, 0.635) 0.007
Treatment line (subsequent line vs. first line) 0.427 (0.171, 1.069) 0.069 0.480 (0.176, 1.311) 0.152
Disease stage (IV vs. III) 1.667 (0.340, 8.172) 0.529

CNS, central nervous system; 95% CI, confidence interval; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; ORs, odds ratios; PR, partial response; PD, progressive disease; SD, stable disease.