Skip to main content
. 2001 Aug 20;69(4):853–862. doi: 10.1086/323419

Table 4.

Two-Locus Conditional Analysis of IDDM Data Using the Ising Model

LOD Score (P)
Chromosome Markera Location(cM) Single Locusb Two Locus Interaction
1 D1S229 238 .003 (NS) 1.43 (.02) Negative
2 D2S301 215 .0004 (NS) 1.30 (.03) Positive
2 D2S119 65 .03 (NS) 1.69 (.01) Negative
3 D3S1560 19 .09 (NS) 1.50 (.02) Negative
3 D3S1576 152 1.09 (.01) 1.70 (.01) Positive
4 D4S431 (D4S412) 12 (5) .90 (.02) 1.57 (.02) Negative
6 D6S294 79 2.26 (.0006)c
7 D7S519 69 .09 (NS) 1.17 (.03) Negative
8 D8S281 (D8S257) 125 (111) .71 (.04) 1.71 (.01) Positive
13 D13S153 46 .005 (NS) 1.72 (.009) Negative
14 D14S276 (D14S75) 56 .93 (.02) 1.65 (.01) Positive
16 D16S3098 108 3.16 (.00006) 4.32 (.00002) Positive
21 D21S219 34 0 (NS) 1.22 (.03) Negative
a

The results shown are for selected loci where the two-locus conditional model is significant at the P<.05 level and where there is evidence (P<.05) for an interaction between the test locus and the conditional locus (HLA). In cases where the locations of the single-locus and two-locus maximum LOD scores are different, the location for the two-locus peak is indicated in parentheses.

b

NS = not significant.

c

This is a two-locus conditional LOD score with no additional interaction term. No interaction is necessary, since any genetic interaction between candidate genes is absorbed by the interaction terms due to linkage between markers. The resulting test is a one-sided LR test with 1 df.