Skip to main content
. 2025 Jun 23;16(3):1001–1012. doi: 10.21037/jgo-2024-982

Table 5. Multivariate logistic regression analysis for RFS before and after PSM.

Variables RFS before PSM RFS after PSM
HR 95% CI P value HR 95% CI P value
LNM+ vs. LNM− 2.7 1.5–4.6 <0.001 2.4 1.2–5 0.01
Age (≥70 vs. <70 years) 1.2 0.7–2.1 0.05 2.1 1–4.1 0.04
Tumor location (colon vs. rectum) 1.4 0.78–2.4 0.28 1.2 0.6–2.5 0.59
CEA (≥2 vs. <2 ng/mL) 1 0.48–2.1 >0.99 0.87 0.33–2.3 0.77
Operation method (laparoscopic vs. open) 1.8 0.7–4.8 0.21 1.2 0.37–4.1 0.73
Operative blood loss (≥100 vs. <100 mL) 1.3 0.54–3.2 0.54 2.1 0.76–5.8 0.15
Tumor size (cm) 1.1 0.93–1.3 0.27 1.2 0.93–1.4 0.19
pT2 vs. pT1 1.3 0.7–2.5 0.39 1.1 0.5–2.6 0.75
Vascular invasion (no vs. yes) 2.3 1.3–4.2 0.004 1.80 0.84–3.7 0.13

CEA, carcinoembryonic antigen; CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; LNM−, lymph node metastasis negative; LNM+, lymph node metastasis positive; PSM, propensity score matching; pT, pathological T stage; RFS, relapse-free survival.