Table 1.
Summary of CNPs Detected by Array CGH[Note]
No. of CNPs |
||||||||
Ethnic Group | No. of SubjectsAnalyzed | Gains | Losses | Showing BothGain and Loss | Detected inPresent Study | Detected bySebat et al. (2004) | Detected byIafrate et al. (2004) | Novel |
American Indians | 7 | 9 | 22 | 13 | 44 | 18 | 9 | 22 |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 16 | 27 | 31 | 17 | 75 | 24 | 14 | 43 |
Whites | 12 | 17 | 22 | 12 | 51 | 16 | 13 | 25 |
Asians | 12 | 26 | 27 | 15 | 68 | 21 | 14 | 37 |
Nonredundant total | 47 | 52 | 50 | 17 | 119 | 22 | 21 | 73 |
Note.— CNPs were scored as either increased or decreased log2 ratios (i.e., gains or losses), relative to the reference DNA. In total, 46 (39%) of 119 of the CNPs we identified have been reported previously, which thus validates the ability of our array to detect known copy-number variations. In our sample population, we identified 22 (71%) of the 31 CNPs detected by Sebat et al. (2004) and 22 (39%) of the 57 CNPs detected by Iafrate et al. (2004) that were represented on the SD microarray.