Skip to main content
American Heart Journal Plus: Cardiology Research and Practice logoLink to American Heart Journal Plus: Cardiology Research and Practice
. 2025 Jul 2;56:100571. doi: 10.1016/j.ahjo.2025.100571

Lactation and cardiovascular health: A comprehensive review

Xuban Palau Villarreal a, Viviana De Assis b, Daniela R Crousillat c, Amanda L Nielson d, Alex M Parker e, Maureen W Groër f, Adetola F Louis-Jacques g,
PMCID: PMC12271083  PMID: 40689046

Abstract

Lactation is increasingly recognized as a modifiable factor influencing long-term maternal cardiovascular health. This review synthesizes current evidence on the association between lactation and cardiometabolic outcomes such as hypertension, type 2 diabetes, coronary artery disease, dyslipidemia, metabolic syndrome, and cardiovascular events. This narrative review also addresses clinical, systemic, and policy barriers that impede lactation success.

Keywords: Lactation, Breast feeding, Cardiovascular health, Metabolism, Pregnancy, Oxytocin, Prolactin, Social determinants of health

1. Introduction

Evidence on the positive association between lactation and maternal cardiometabolic health has been developing over the past three decades [[1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9]]. Although women are traditionally diagnosed with cardiovascular disease (CVD) at an older age as compared with men, CVD risk factors, which are associated with lifetime CVD risk, are rising among younger women [10,11]. Given the rising burden of CVD risk among younger women, lactation may represent an effective strategy to reduce CVD incidence [12].

Over the last decade, reproductive factors such as early and late menarche, polycystic ovarian syndrome, premature menopause, adverse pregnancy outcomes (APOs), and suboptimal lactation have been recognized as CVD risk factors [[13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22]]. Additionally, adverse social determinants of health are barriers to optimal lactation and CV health in women. In the United States, American Indian or Alaskan Native and non-Hispanic Black women have the lowest rates of breastfeeding and the highest rates of CV-related mortality [23,24]. Persisting structural inequities continue to widen the gaps in health care quality and access that contribute to non-biological differences in CV risk [25].

The objective of this review is to synthesize current evidence on the association between lactation and cardiometabolic outcomes. This review also addresses clinical and systemic barriers that impede lactation success. Our goal is to increase knowledge of maternal cardiometabolic benefits of lactation, and the recognition of suboptimal lactation as a cardiovascular risk factor.

2. Pregnancy, lactation, and the cardiovascular system

2.1. Cardiovascular adaptations during pregnancy

During pregnancy, the maternal CV system undergoes adaptations to support both maternal and fetal needs. In the first trimester, one of the earliest changes observed is an increase in maternal heart rate (HR) mediated by estrogen-regulated increase in myocardial alpha-receptors, which progressively rises to 15–25 % above baseline by the third trimester. This change supports a significant increase in cardiac output (CO) as the systemic vascular resistance drops to maximize uteroplacental circulation [26,27].

In the second trimester, progesterone primarily induces vasodilation, which lowers the resistance in the placental bed and contributes to a gradual decrease in blood pressure (5–15 mmHg in systolic and diastolic blood pressure about 24 weeks gestation) [28]. Concurrently, plasma volume continues to increase, reaching an approximate 40 % increase by the third trimester. This increase in plasma volume drives a 45 % increase in CO. [29] These CV changes are vital for optimal perfusion of both maternal and fetal tissues [30].

By the third trimester, systemic blood pressure often returns to pre-pregnancy levels [28,31]. Physical manifestations of CV adaptations can include mild tachycardia, peripheral edema, systolic flow murmur, S3 gallop, and lateral displacement of the left ventricular apex [28,31]. Immediately following delivery, there is a rapid increase in systemic vascular resistance, autotransfusion of blood from the contracting uterus, and a gradual decrease in the maternal HR to baseline by approximately 10 days postpartum [26,30]. Women who consistently lactated for 5 months had lower systolic blood pressure and heart rate compared to their counterparts who formula-fed their newborns (Fig. 1) [32].

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Breastfeeding and its effect on the cardiovascular and metabolic systems [61].

2.2. Hormonal regulation and cardiovascular changes during lactation

The neuropeptide hormone oxytocin, synthesized in the hypothalamus and released into the circulation by the posterior pituitary (Fig. 1) surges during lactation and causes vasodilatory effects [33]. These vasodilatory effects promote relaxation of the vascular smooth muscle which leads to decreased peripheral resistance, HR, and blood pressure, as well as increased CO. [33] Moreover, oxytocin has been shown to have anti-atherosclerotic properties and anti-obesogenic effects [34]. Oxytocin moderates factors directly linked to atherosclerotic CVD such as inflammation, weight gain, food intake, and insulin resistance [34]. Additionally, oxytocin surge with lactation initiation can promote uterine involution protecting against postpartum blood loss which can indirectly benefit CV health [35].

Oxytocin is an important trigger for prolactin secretion [36]. Prolactin is a hormone secreted by the maternal pituitary gland which acts on the mammary glands to promote breast milk synthesis (Fig. 1) [37]. Prolactin secretion increases during late gestation and in the postpartum period. Prolactin can be cleaved into a vasculo-toxic product that in mice has been associated with endothelial dysfunction, microvascular disease, and myocyte death [37]. Dysregulation of the prolactin axis in pregnancy and postpartum has been linked to impaired vascular adaptation that has been implicated in both preeclampsia and peripartum cardiomyopathy [37,38]. In obese or overweight women, lower levels of oxytocin may reduce prolactin secretion, which could lead to lactation difficulties and earlier weaning [39,40].

2.3. Metabolic adaptations during pregnancy and lactation

Weight gain and an increase in visceral adiposity during pregnancy are theorized to support the increase in caloric expenditure postpartum which is evolutionarily designed to support a growing infant with lactation [41,42]. Insulin resistance and glucose intolerance increase during pregnancy, resulting in greater maternal fat reserves [43]. Significant elevations of low-density lipoprotein and triglycerides during pregnancy allow for greater transfer of fatty acids to the growing fetus while creating a more atherogenic profile in the mother that may lead to endothelial damage [5,44].

During lactation, large quantities of carbohydrates, protein, and lipids are exported through the mammary gland into the offspring via breast milk. This process is energetically expensive for the mother, and to meet the nutrient demand, increased food intake or mobilization of storage depots is required [45]. This lipid mobilization and increased energy expenditure associated with lactation is thought to lead to a faster return to maternal pre-pregnancy homeostasis [46].

Dietary intake and energy expenditure during lactation can be associated with weight loss [47]. Butte et al. found a mean mobilization of 156 kcal/day from fat stores in women who exclusively lactated [48]. Women who consumed more calories, had less weight loss [49]. Within the first 2–3 months postpartum, multiple studies have shown that formula-feeding mothers consumed 600–800 fewer calories than lactating mothers [50,51]. Another study found that women consumed an additional 300 kcal/day during lactation and expended 200 kcal/day less in physical activity to support the estimated 480 kcal/day needed for lactation [12,52]. Women may compensate for the increased energy demand of lactation by increasing their dietary intake and reducing their energy expenditure, rather than mobilizing fat stores [[50], [51], [52]].

Women who lactated beyond 3 months postpartum experienced greater weight loss compared to those who did not lactate or only lactated for 3 months [53]. However, the association between postpartum weight loss and lactation is mixed [[54], [55], [56], [57]]. A systemic review of 43 observational studies found insufficient evidence to suggest a relationship between lactation and postpartum weight change [58]. Of these 43 studies, five obtained objective measurements for postpartum weight change and adjusted for key covariates such as gestational weight gain and parity [58]. Four of the 5 studies reported a direct positive association between duration of lactation and postpartum weight loss [58]. Moreover, there may be an association between the duration of lactation and a reduction in visceral adipose tissue [59,60].

3. Implications of lactational history on maternal cardiovascular health

Lactation has been associated with reduction in major CV risk factors such as metabolic syndrome, type II diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and hypertension (Fig. 2) [62,63]. Each added month of lactation was associated with a 1 % decreased lifetime risk of developing T2DM [62,64]. Individuals affected by GDM who lactate for >6 months had the lowest risk of developing postpartum diabetes with the reduced risk extending up to 2 years post-delivery [44,65]. This T2DM risk reduction associated with lactation can reduce the risk of CVD [7].

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Maternal benefits associated with lactation [76].

Lactation is also associated with hypertension reduction (Fig. 2) [4,32,40,66]. Lee et al. reported that women who had never lactated showed an increased risk of premenopausal hypertension [5]. Women with cumulative lactation of one year or more can experience a 12 % lower risk of hypertension [4,32,40,66]. This risk reduction appears to be dose-dependent with women who lactated for 0–6 months, 6–12 months, or > 12 months showing an 8 %, 11 %, and 12 % lower risk, respectively [63,[67], [68], [69]]. Compared to women who never lactated, those who lactated had a 7 % lower risk of developing hypertension, after adjusting for age, body mass index, and smoking [63,69]. Additionally, lactation intensity may influence hypertension risk [70]. A study comparing exclusive, almost exclusive, predominant, and partial lactation showed that exclusive and almost exclusive lactation was associated with lower diastolic blood pressure [70].

Lactation has been recognized for its long-lasting metabolic benefits, mothers who lactate were on average 8 kg lighter 6 years after cessation of lactation [64]. Besides, lactation can improve insulin requirements, glucose tolerance, and lipid metabolism in the postpartum period [52,71]. These benefits may be associated with the 500 daily caloric deficit with full lactation [47].

In the U.S., dyslipidemia is highest in Hispanic/Latina women (37 % with total cholesterol levels of ≥200 mg/dL) [72]. While atherogenic lipid profiles have been shown to increase the long-term risk of CVD, lactation has been associated with improved lipid homeostasis (Fig. 2) [2,3,73,74]. Duration of lifetime lactation has been inversely associated with serum triglycerides, total cholesterol, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol [46]. A positive association between lactation and HDL metabolism has been reported at 6 weeks and 3 months postpartum, with higher HDL levels until weaning for those who lactate for 1 year [2,3,73,74]. In the Keiser SWIFT cohort, a greater lactation frequency was associated with higher HDL and lower LDL at 6 to 9 weeks postpartum [41]. Prior evaluation of triglyceride levels, has shown a return to baseline 13 weeks earlier in lactating than non-lactating women [42]. Lactation may decrease the risk of CVD by improving lipid homeostasis [7,75].

Metabolic syndrome refers to a clustering of metabolic abnormalities including insulin resistance, dyslipidemia, hypertension, and obesity [43]. Metabolic syndrome can increase the risk of diabetes mellitus, CVD, and major CV events [8,43]. Nguyen et al. observed that lactation can decrease the risk of developing metabolic syndrome [46]. Several studies have reported an inverse association between the duration of lactation and the incidence of metabolic syndrome in midlife parous women, indicating that longer lactation duration showed a lower incidence of metabolic syndrome [9,74]. Moreover, Magnus et al. highlighted that lactation could improve the cardiometabolic profile by reducing lower body mass index, waist circumference, and levels of C-reactive protein, triglycerides, insulin, and proinsulin [45]. This improved cardiometabolic profile was observed decades after cessation of lactation, further demonstrating the potential long-term metabolic benefits of lactation [45].

3.1. Implications of lactation history on cardiovascular health in animal studies

Current animal models for lactation and CV health, focus on the effects of early weaning, exclusive feeding, overfeeding, or on the on the maternal dietary composition and its impact on long-term CVD risk and possible changes in metabolism through epigenetic mechanisms on the offspring [[77], [78], [79]]. Investigators, measured regional changes in lipoprotein lipase activity as a proxy for fat deposition in the rat [80]. Fat deposition was noted to increase during pregnancy, but with lactation, storage of lipids in adipose tissue ceased, and uptake into mammary tissue increased as lipids were transferred into milk [80]. At 20 days postpartum, lactating animals had smaller adipose cells and lower peripheral lipoprotein lipase activity than nonlactating controls [81]. These animal studies of longer-term lactation show similar results to human studies after longer durations of lactation [53].

Some limitations of animal studies include the controlled nutrition in laboratory settings and sometimes separation of pups. The diverse diets and caloric expenditures of humans, mixed feeding—combining formula and lactation in differing proportions—makes it more challenging to draw direct comparisons to studies in animals.

4. Lactation's influence in mitigating sequelae of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP)

Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) can present as a risk factor for developing CVD later in life [82]. Efforts are being made to understand the cardioprotective effect of lactation in HDP [82]. Countouris et al. compared lactating women with preeclampsia, lactating women with gestational hypertension, and normotensive lactating women and found both lower systolic and diastolic blood pressures in women with gestational hypertension [49]. Another study assessed the impact of lactation on preeclampsia, and showed women who had lactated in previous pregnancies had a lower risk of preeclampsia than women who had never lactated [83].

5. Lactation's influence on future cardiovascular events

5.1. Myocardial infarction (MI)

In a cohort study, an inverse association was found between lactation and MI, independent of risk factors of CVD [84]. Women with a lifetime lactation of >23 months presented a higher risk reduction for MI compared to those with shorter lactation duration [84]. Furthermore, a meta-analysis demonstrated that parous women who had ever lactated had a reduced risk of MI (HR 0.86 [95 % CI 0.78, 0.95]) compared to parous women who had never lactated [63].

5.2. Coronary artery disease

There is also a relationship between lactation and coronary artery disease (CAD). Schwarz et al. reported that mothers who had never lactated were more likely to develop aortic and coronary artery calcification compared to mothers who had lactated for at least 3 months after adjusting for CVD risk factors [85]. However, there were no differences between exclusive and non-exclusive lactation groups [85]. Tschiderer et al. reported that 12-month lactation duration was negatively associated with CAD risk, and longer than 12 months of lactation had a progressive decreased risk for CAD [63]. However, another study noted a plateau of reduced CAD risk between 12 and 48 months, suggesting the unknown additional CAD risk reduction past 12 months of lactation [86].

Even though no studies have assessed the effect of lactation on carotid flow, many have studied the relationship between lactation and carotid intima-media thickness. In a study by Augoulea et al., postmenopausal women who lactated for at least 6 months had lower carotid intima-media thickness and reduced prevalence of subclinical atherosclerosis [87]. Perez-Roncero et al. found that women, who had lactated for 36 months, had a lower carotid intima-media thickness and higher HDL cholesterol levels than women who lactated for <6 months [88].

5.3. Stroke and cerebrovascular accidents

Lactation is associated with a reduced risk of stroke and cerebrovascular accidents in parous postmenopausal women [86,89,90]. A study showed that women with a lifetime lactation duration of 7 months had a lower risk of stroke (HR 0.52 [95 % CI, 0.50–0.55] to 0.64 [95 % CI, 0.59–0.69]) and intracerebral hemorrhage (HR 0.56 [95 % CI, 0.49–0.63] to 0.78 [95 % CI, 0.64–0.96]) compared to those who never lactated [89]. However, reduced risk of subarachnoid hemorrhage was observed only with a lifetime duration of lactation >24 months (HR 0.61 [95 % CI, 0.57–0.66]) [89]. Additionally, Jacobson et al. reported that women with a lifetime lactation of 1 month or longer had a 23 % decreased risk of stroke (HR 0.77 [95 % CI, 0.70–0.84]) compared to those who had never lactated [90].

6. The interplay between cardiovascular health and lactation

We discussed the potential benefits of lactation on CV health, however, it is known that CV health can also influence lactation [91]. Burgess et al. suggests that women with a history of HDP are less likely to initiate and continue lactation when compared to normotensive women [91]. In addition, data from the All Our Families Cohort demonstrated that women with HDP had lower rates of non-exclusive lactation at 4 months and a shorter lactation duration at 12 months compared to women without HDP [92].

The lower rates of lactation duration and exclusivity were observed in groups with an increased need for medical interventions and postpartum complications, which may present as lactation barriers [91]. Among these, women with HDP reported that the most common reason to stop or not initiate lactation was feeling sick or that they had to stop for medical reasons [91]. Moreover, the study notes that late-onset preeclampsia (≥34 weeks' gestation) displayed higher lactation intent than those women with early-onset preeclampsia (<34 weeks' gestation) [91]. Women with early onset preeclampsia were more likely to have infants in the NICU highlighting increased maternal/infant separation and hindered lactation initiation and establishment of the milk supply [91]. The maternal-infant separation from preterm birth, maternal complications postpartum, and psychosocial stressors associated with HDP diagnosis may discourage lactation initiation [91]. Implementation of Spatz et al.'s ten steps for promoting and protecting breastfeeding for vulnerable infants during hospitalization may improve lactation support [93]. Women with cardiac disease managed at a comprehensive cardio obstetrical program for their pregnancy demonstrated high lactation initiation rates (85 %) but low continuation rates in the acute postpartum period (40 %) [94] highlighting the need for interventions both at the time of delivery admission in addition to continuation of resources and support postpartum.

While few medications are contraindicated during lactation, there is a gap in clinician knowledge regarding medication compatibility with lactation [95,96]. Tigka et al. reported that 39 out of 57 lactating women were inaccurately counseled to discontinue lactation by a clinician despite medication compatibility [97]. For instance, Colaceci et al. found medication package leaflets reported higher risk profiles than evidence-based scientific sources for the use of antihypertensive medications during lactation [98]. Inconsistent or inaccurate information on the use of medications during lactation may lead to cautious and harmful recommendations [98].

7. Potential negative impact of lactation on cardiovascular health

Peripartum cardiomyopathy (PPCM) is defined as a decline in maternal cardiac function that occurs in the third trimester or first few months postpartum in the absence of other identifiable causes [99]. PPCM is more prevalent among women of advanced maternal age, multi-gestational pregnancies, and HDP, however, the role of prolactin and lactation have also been linked in both the pathogenesis as well as in the recovery of left ventricular function [100,101]. During pregnancy and postpartum, an increase in oxidative stress upregulates cathepsin D which cleaves prolactin into 16-kDA prolactin fragment which in mice models has been shown to lead to endothelial damage and increase cardiomyocyte apoptosis. Therefore, bromocriptine, a D2 receptor agonist that inhibits prolactin secretion, has been shown in several studies to improve the likelihood of recovery of LV systolic function. A systematic review of 8 studies of 593 patients with PPCM demonstrated increased survival (91.6 % versus 83.9 %) and showed a higher LVEF (53.3 % versus 41.8 %) with bromocriptine treatment [37,102].

The current ACC/AHA guidelines recommend consideration of use of bromocriptine for lactation suppression in severe LV systolic dysfunction (LVEF <25 %) or cardiogenic shock in the context of PPCM but highlight the marked benefits of lactation and recommend shared decision-making until more data is available. Among the Investigations of the Pregnancy-Associated Cardiomyopathy (IPAC) study, Koczo et al. followed 100 women diagnosed with PPCM throughout their first year postpartum and assessed the lactation impact on PPCM in lactating and non-lactating women. The study found higher circulating levels of prolactin among the lactation cohort and no differences were observed in LVEF recovery between non-lactating women vs 6 and 12-month lactating women [103]. The U.S.-based REBIRTH (Randomized Evaluation of Bromocriptine in Myocardial Recovery Therapy for Peripartum Cardiomyopathy, NCT05180773) comparing bromocriptine for lactation suppression versus lactation is currently ongoing and aims to determine if bromocriptine is associated with better outcomes than standard medical therapy for heart failure [100].

8. Optimizing lactation in socially vulnerable populations

8.1. Barriers to lactation

In the U.S. the prevalence of lactation initiation is high (84.1 %) with disparities based on social determinants of health [104]. Black women have the lowest rate of lactation initiation (75.4 %) compared to the highest rate observed in Asian mothers (92.7 %) [104]. Differences in lactation rates are also influenced by income, language, age, parity, education, employment benefits, access to health care, and lactation support [[105], [106], [107], [108], [109]]. Among 142,643 new mothers in the 2016–2019 Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS), 60.4 % reported lactating up to 3 months and 54.7 % up to 6 months. High school education or lower, Medicaid insurance coverage, and absence of lactation support from the health care team was associated with lower breastfeeding rates [105]. Mothers who reported food insecurity, including participation in WIC (Women, Infants, and Children), were less likely to continue lactation. Participants reported that the financial burden of increased food intake to meet caloric demands of lactation, financial pressures to return to work sooner, and the cost of lactation equipment were reasons why they ceased lactation [106]. Lower breastfeeding education and support, and lower household income was associated with lower lactation initiation among Black women [107].

Hispanic women have slightly lower rates of lactation initiation compared to White women. However, duration and exclusivity disparities are present [104]. Cultural factors including nativity and acculturation can present as additional elements impacting lactation rates among Hispanic women. Foreign-born Hispanic women and Spanish-speaking women had higher lactation rates compared to U.S.-born Hispanic women [108]. Lastly, Singh et al. found that immigrant women had higher rates of lactation initiation and longer lactation duration than U.S.-born women [109]. Thus, lactation promotion programs should target ethnic-immigrant and social groups with lower lactation rates (Fig. 3) [109].

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Barriers and solutions to lactation.

8.2. Strategies for improving lactation support

Multi-level interventions including national, state legislative, and medical provider support are needed to enable breastfeeding, and to maximize the health benefit for all lactating individuals. Interventions include paid parental leave, workplace accommodations, and expansion of insurance coverage for lactation support (Fig. 3). The expansion of postpartum Medicaid for up to 12 months postpartum in up to 48 U.S. states has demonstrated improved access to lactation supplies and increased favorable lactation outcomes [110]. Community-based peer support strategies include the engagement of community health workers, doulas, and community outreach to help reinforce lactation, particularly among historically marginalized communities with low lactation rates (Fig. 3) [111]. Importantly, educating healthcare professionals on the effect of systemic racism and implicit bias on lactation is essential (Fig. 3). Educational campaigns surrounding the benefits of lactation and the facilitation of community peer counseling and support groups in the community are vital to addressing cultural norms, stigma, and challenges.

9. Future research directions

Despite the growing evidence of the benefits of lactation in maternal CV health, there are remaining gaps in evidence [68]. Longitudinal studies with detailed lactation history such as duration, frequency, and exclusivity, biomarkers, and maternal CV health outcomes are needed. Such longitudinal studies could enhance clinical recommendations in lactation practice to maximize maternal CV health benefits. Mechanistic investigations are crucial to understanding the biological pathways through which lactation benefits maternal CV health. Racial and ethnic differences (socially based) in metabolic and inflammatory changes may show variations in CV benefits that need to be explored [112,113]. For instance, social determinants can contribute to the observed higher rates in diabetes and hypertension in Hispanic and Black women respectively which underscores the need for tailored preventative efforts [114]. Future studies investigating structural barriers such as inadequate maternity leave, limited access to lactation support, and healthcare inequities can aid the design of lactation interventions in diverse populations [115].

10. Conclusion

Lactation offers a unique period, with significant implications for prevention and intervention strategies for maternal CV health. By deepening our understanding of these connections, healthcare providers can better advocate for lactation as a cornerstone of maternal health. Additionally, ensuring equitable access to lactation education and support through public health strategies can enhance maternal CV health across all populations [115].

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Xuban Palau Villarreal: Conceptualization, Investigation, Project administration, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. Viviana De Assis: Conceptualization, Investigation, Project administration, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. Daniela R. Crousillat: Conceptualization, Investigation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. Amanda L. Nielson: Investigation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. Alex M. Parker: Writing – review & editing. Maureen W. Groër: Writing – review & editing. Adetola F. Louis-Jacques: Conceptualization, Investigation, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.

Ethical statement

All authors affirm that this manuscript is an original work and complies with ethical standards for research and publication.

Funding sources

ALJ's effort supported by Robert A Winn Excellence in Clinical Trials Career Development Award.

Declaration of competing interest

All authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

No acknowledgments.

References

  • 1.Qureshi I., et al. Hyperlipidaemia during normal pregnancy, parturition and lactation. Ann. Acad. Med. Singap. 1999;28(2):217–221. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Erkkola R., et al. One-year follow-up of lipoprotein metabolism after pregnancy. Biol. Res. Pregnancy Perinatol. 1986;7(2):47–51. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Knopp R.H., et al. Effect of postpartum lactation on lipoprotein lipids and apoproteins. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 1985;60(3):542–547. doi: 10.1210/jcem-60-3-542. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Stuebe A.M., et al. Duration of lactation and incidence of maternal hypertension: a longitudinal cohort study. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2011;174(10):1147–1158. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwr227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Lee S.Y., K.M., Jee S.H., Yang H.P. Does long-term lactation protect premenopausal women against hypertension risk? A Korean women’s cohort study. 2005;41(2):433–438. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.11.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Schwarz E.B., et al. Lactation and maternal risk of type 2 diabetes: a population-based study. Am. J. Med. 2010;123(9):863.e1–863.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2010.03.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Stuebe A.M., et al. Duration of lactation and incidence of type 2 diabetes. JAMA. 2005;294(20):2601–2610. doi: 10.1001/jama.294.20.2601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Rooney B.L., Schauberger C.W. Excess pregnancy weight gain and long-term obesity: one decade later. Obstet. Gynecol. 2002;100(2):245–252. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(02)02125-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Gunderson E.P., et al. Duration of lactation and incidence of the metabolic syndrome in women of reproductive age according to gestational diabetes mellitus status: a 20-year prospective study in CARDIA (Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults) Diabetes. 2010;59(2):495–504. doi: 10.2337/db09-1197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Okunrintemi V., et al. Sex differences in the age of diagnosis for cardiovascular disease and its risk factors among US adults: trends from 2008 to 2017, the medical expenditure panel survey. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2020;9(24) doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.018764. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Cameron N.A., et al. Geographic differences in prepregnancy cardiometabolic health in the United States, 2016 through 2019. Circulation. 2022;145(7):549–551. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.057107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Goldberg G.R., Prentice P.A., Coward W.A., et al. Longitudinal assessment of the components of energy balance in well-nourished lactating women. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1991;54(5):788–798. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/54.5.788. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Arnett D.K., et al. 2019 ACC/AHA guideline on the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2019;140(11):e596–e646. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000678. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Grundy S.M., et al. 2018 AHA/ACC/AACVPR/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/ADA/AGS/APhA/ASPC/NLA/PCNA guideline on the Management of Blood Cholesterol: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2019;139(25):e1082–e1143. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000625. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Magliano D.J., Boyko E.J. 2021. IDF Diabetes Atlas. (Brussels) [Google Scholar]
  • 16.O’Kelly A.C., et al. Pregnancy and reproductive risk factors for cardiovascular disease in women. Circ. Res. 2022;130(4):652–672. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.121.319895. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Regitz-Zagrosek V., et al. 2018 ESC Guidelines for the management of cardiovascular diseases during pregnancy. Eur. Heart J. 2018;39(34):3165–3241. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy340. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Bellamy L., et al. Type 2 diabetes mellitus after gestational diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2009;373(9677):1773–1779. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60731-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Grande J.P., et al. Cardiogastric fistula occurring 9 years after resection of left ventricular aneurysm. Int. J. Cardiol. 1990;27(3):327–331. doi: 10.1016/0167-5273(90)90289-h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Shelton R.L., McCauley R.J. Use of a hinge-type speech prosthesis. Cleft Palate J. 1986;23(4):312–317. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Vounzoulaki E., et al. Progression to type 2 diabetes in women with a known history of gestational diabetes: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2020;369 doi: 10.1136/bmj.m1361. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 212 summary: pregnancy and heart disease. Obstet. Gynecol. 2019;133(5):1067–1072. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003244. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Castañeda S.F., Rosenbaum R.P., Holscher J.T., Madanat H., Talavera G.A. Cardiovascular disease risk factors among Latino migrant and seasonal farmworkers. J. Agromedicine. 2015;20(2):95–104. doi: 10.1080/1059924X.2015.1010060. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.CDC Pregnancy-related deaths: data from maternal mortality review committees in 38 U.S. states. 2020. https://www.cdc.gov/maternal-mortality/php/data-research/index.html Available from:
  • 25.Benjamin E.J., Virani S.S., Callaway C.W., et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics—2018 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2018;137(12):e67–e492. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000558. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Visentin S., Palermo C., Camerin M., Daliento L., Muraru D., Cosmi E., et al. Echocardiographic techniques of deformation imaging in the evaluation of maternal cardiovascular system in patients with complicated pregnancies. Biomed. Res. Int. 2017;2017(1):1–10. doi: 10.1155/2017/4139635. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Lee W. Cardiorespiratory alterations during normal pregnancy. Crit. Care Clin. 1991;7 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Hill C.C., Pickinpaugh J. Physiologic changes in pregnancy. Surg. Clin. North Am. 2008;88(2):391–401. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2007.12.005. (vii) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Litmanovich D.E., et al. Cardiothoracic imaging in the pregnant patient. J. Thorac. Imaging. 2014;29(1):38–49. doi: 10.1097/RTI.0000000000000064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Mabie W.C., DiSessa T.G., Crocker L.G., et al. A longitudinal study of cardiac output in normal human pregnancy. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1994;170(3):849–856. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(94)70297-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Duvekot J.J., Cheriex E.C., Pieters F.A., et al. Early pregnancy changes in hemodynamics and volume homeostasis are consecutive adjustments triggered by a primary fall in systemic vascular tone. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1993;169(6):1382–1392. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(93)90405-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Groer M.W., et al. Breastfeeding status and maternal cardiovascular variables across the postpartum. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2013;22(5):453–459. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2012.3981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Mezzacappa E.S., et al. Breast-feeding and maternal cardiovascular function. Psychophysiology. 2001;38(6):988–997. doi: 10.1111/1469-8986.3860988. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Reiss A.B., et al. Oxytocin: Potential to mitigate cardiovascular risk. Peptides. 2019;117 doi: 10.1016/j.peptides.2019.05.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.An official position statement of the Association of Women's Health, O. and N. Neonatal, breastfeeding and the use of human milk. Nurs. Womens Health. 2021;25(5):e4–e8. doi: 10.1016/j.nwh.2021.06.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Kennett J.E., McKee D.T. Oxytocin: an emerging regulator of prolactin secretion in the female rat. J. Neuroendocrinol. 2012;24(3):403–412. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2826.2011.02263.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Hilfiker-Kleiner D., et al. A cathepsin D-cleaved 16 kDa form of prolactin mediates postpartum cardiomyopathy. Cell. 2007;128(3):589–600. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.12.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Reuwer A.Q., Reuwer P.J., van der Post J.A., et al. Prolactin fragmentation by trophoblastic matrix metalloproteinases as a possible contributor to peripartum cardiomyopathy and pre-eclampsia. Med. Hypotheses. 2010;74(2):348–352. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2009.08.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Stuebe A.M., et al. Prevalence and risk factors for early, undesired weaning attributed to lactation dysfunction. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2014;23(5):404–412. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2013.4506. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Rasmussen K.M., Kjolhede C.L. Prepregnant overweight and obesity diminish the prolactin response to suckling in the first week postpartum. Pediatrics. 2004;113(5):e465–e471. doi: 10.1542/peds.113.5.e465. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Gunderson E.P., et al. Lactation intensity and fasting plasma lipids, lipoproteins, non-esterified free fatty acids, leptin and adiponectin in postpartum women with recent gestational diabetes mellitus: the SWIFT cohort. Metabolism. 2014;63(7):941–950. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2014.04.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Darmady J.M., Postle A.D. Lipid metabolism in pregnancy. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 1982;89(3):211–215. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1982.tb03616.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Kip K.E., et al. Clinical importance of obesity versus the metabolic syndrome in cardiovascular risk in women: a report from the Women’s Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE) study. Circulation. 2004;109(6):706–713. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000115514.44135.A8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Jager S., et al. Breast-feeding and maternal risk of type 2 diabetes: a prospective study and meta-analysis. Diabetologia. 2014;57(7):1355–1365. doi: 10.1007/s00125-014-3247-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Magnus M.C., et al. Breastfeeding and later-life cardiometabolic health in women with and without hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2023;12(5) doi: 10.1161/JAHA.122.026696. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Nguyen B., Jin K., Ding D. Breastfeeding and maternal cardiovascular risk factors and outcomes: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2017;12(11) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187923. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Butte N.F., Wong W.W., Hopkinson J.M. Energy requirements of lactating women derived from doubly labeled water and milk energy output. J. Nutr. 2001;131(1):53–58. doi: 10.1093/jn/131.1.53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Butte N.F., et al. Effect of maternal diet and body composition on lactational performance. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1984;39(2):296–306. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/39.2.296. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Countouris M.E., Schwarz E.B., Rossiter B.C., et al. Effects of lactation on postpartum blood pressure among women with gestational hypertension and preeclampsia. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2016;215(2):241e1–241e2418. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.02.046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.van Raaij J.M., et al. Energy cost of lactation, and energy balances of well-nourished Dutch lactating women: reappraisal of the extra energy requirements of lactation. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1991;53(3):612–619. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/53.3.612. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Sadurskis A., et al. Energy metabolism, body composition, and milk production in healthy Swedish women during lactation. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1988;48(1):44–49. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/48.1.44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Butte N.F., et al. Adjustments in energy expenditure and substrate utilization during late pregnancy and lactation. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1999;69(2):299–307. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/69.2.299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Dewey K.G., Heinig M.J., Nommsen L.A. Maternal weight-loss patterns during prolonged lactation. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1993;58(2):162–166. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/58.2.162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Gunderson E.P., et al. Lactation and changes in maternal metabolic risk factors. Obstet. Gynecol. 2007;109(3):729–738. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000252831.06695.03. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Stuebe A.M., et al. Duration of lactation and maternal metabolism at 3 years postpartum. J. Womens Health. 2010;19(5):941–950. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2009.1660. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Hatsu I.E., McDougald D.M., Anderson A.K. Effect of infant feeding on maternal body composition. Int. Breastfeed. J. 2008;3:1–8. doi: 10.1186/1746-4358-3-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Bobrow K., et al. Persistent effects of women’s parity and breastfeeding patterns on their body mass index: results from the Million Women Study. Int. J. Obes. 2013;37(5):712–717. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2012.76. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Neville C., et al. The relationship between breastfeeding and postpartum weight change—a systematic review and critical evaluation. Int. J. Obes. 2014;38(4):577–590. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2013.132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.McClure C.K., et al. Maternal visceral adiposity by consistency of lactation. Matern. Child Health J. 2012;16:316–321. doi: 10.1007/s10995-011-0758-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.McClure C.K., et al. Breastfeeding and subsequent maternal visceral adiposity. Obesity. 2011;19(11):2205–2213. doi: 10.1038/oby.2011.185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Palau X. Breastfeeding and its effect on the cardiovascular and metabolic systems. 2025. https://BioRender.com/5y0q2y5 Available from:
  • 62.Pinho-Gomes A.C., et al. Association of lactation with maternal risk of type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Diabetes Obes. Metab. 2021;23(8):1902–1916. doi: 10.1111/dom.14417. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Tschiderer L., Willeit P., Peters S.A.E. The cardiovascular benefits of breastfeeding to mothers. Expert. Rev. Cardiovasc. Ther. 2022;20(8):589–592. doi: 10.1080/14779072.2022.2100761. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Sharma A.J., Dee D.L., Harden S.M. Adherence to breastfeeding guidelines and maternal weight 6 years after delivery. Pediatrics. 2014;134(Suppl. 1):S42–S49. doi: 10.1542/peds.2014-0646H. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Gunderson E.P., et al. Lactation and progression to type 2 diabetes mellitus after gestational diabetes mellitus: a prospective cohort study. Ann. Intern. Med. 2015;163(12):889–898. doi: 10.7326/M15-0807. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Chen D.C., Nommsen-Rivers L., Dewey K.G., Lonnerdal B., Lönnerdal B. Stress during labor and delivery and early lactation performance. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1998;68(2):335–344. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/68.2.335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Rameez R.M., et al. Association of maternal lactation with diabetes and hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Netw. Open. 2019;2(10) doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.13401. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Schwarz E.B., et al. Duration of lactation and risk factors for maternal cardiovascular disease. Obstet. Gynecol. 2009;113(5):974–982. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000346884.67796.ca. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Qu G., Wang L., Tang X., et al. Association between duration of breastfeeding and maternal hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Breastfeed. Med. 2018;13(5):318–326. doi: 10.1089/bfm.2017.0180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Heltbech M.S., Jensen C.L., Girma T., et al. The associations of breastfeeding status at 6 months with anthropometry, body composition, and cardiometabolic markers at 5 years in the Ethiopian infant anthropometry and body composition birth cohort. Nutrients. 2023;15(21):4595. doi: 10.3390/nu15214595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Yang J.Q., Xu Y.H., Gai M.Y. Breast-feeding in reducing regular insulin requirement in postpartum for insulin dependent diabetes mellitus and gestational diabetes mellitus. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 1994;29(3):135–137, 188. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Mehta L.S., et al. Cardiovascular disease risk factors in women: the impact of race and ethnicity: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2023;147(19):1471–1487. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Kallio M.J., et al. Serum cholesterol and lipoprotein concentrations in mothers during and after prolonged exclusive lactation. Metabolism. 1992;41(12):1327–1330. doi: 10.1016/0026-0495(92)90103-h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Kjos S.L., et al. The effect of lactation on glucose and lipid metabolism in women with recent gestational diabetes. Obstet. Gynecol. 1993;82(3):451–455. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Saeed A., Kampangkaew J., Nambi V. Prevention of cardiovascular disease in women. Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc. J. 2017;13(4):185–192. doi: 10.14797/mdcj-13-4-185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Palau X. Maternal benefits associated with lactation. 2025. https://BioRender.com/wm2datu Available from:
  • 77.Souza L.L., de Moura E.G., Lisboa P.C. Does early weaning shape future endocrine and metabolic disorders? Lessons from animal models. J. Dev. Orig. Health Dis. 2020;11(5):441–451. doi: 10.1017/S2040174420000410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Uson-Lopez R.A., et al. Melinjo (Gnetum gnemon) seed extract consumption during lactation improved vasodilation and attenuated the development of hypertension in female offspring of fructose-fed pregnant rats. Birth Defects Res. 2018;110(1):27–34. doi: 10.1002/bdr2.1109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Gonzalez-Hedstrom D., et al. Overfeeding during lactation in rats is associated with cardiovascular insulin resistance in the short-term. Nutrients. 2020;12(2) doi: 10.3390/nu12020549. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Hamosh M., et al. Lipoprotein lipase activity of adipose and mammary tissue and plasma triglyceride in pregnant and lactating rats. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1970;210(3):473–482. doi: 10.1016/0005-2760(70)90044-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Steingrimsdottir L., Brasel J.A., Greenwood M.R. Diet, pregnancy, and lactation: effects on adipose tissue, lipoprotein lipase, and fat cell size. Metabolism. 1980;29(9):837–841. doi: 10.1016/0026-0495(80)90122-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Horsley K., Chaput K., Da Costa D., et al. Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and breastfeeding practices: a secondary analysis of data from the All Our Families Cohort. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 2022;101(8):871–879. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14378. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Adam I., Rayis D.A., ALhabardi N.A., et al. Association between breastfeeding and preeclampsia in parous women: a case–control study. Int. Breastfeed. J. 2021;16(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s13006-021-00391-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Stuebe A.M., et al. Duration of lactation and incidence of myocardial infarction in middle to late adulthood. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2009;200(2):138.e1–138.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.10.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Schwarz E.B., et al. Lactation and maternal measures of subclinical cardiovascular disease. Obstet. Gynecol. 2010;115(1):41–48. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181c5512a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Tschiderer L., et al. Breastfeeding is associated with a reduced maternal cardiovascular risk: systematic review and meta-analysis involving data from 8 studies and 1 192 700 parous women. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2022;11(2) doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.022746. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Augoulea A., et al. Breastfeeding is associated with lower subclinical atherosclerosis in postmenopausal women. Gynecol. Endocrinol. 2020;36(9):796–799. doi: 10.1080/09513590.2020.1782374. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Perez-Roncero G.R., et al. Association of breastfeeding duration with carotid intima-media thickness in later life: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gynecol. Endocrinol. 2021;37(9):778–784. doi: 10.1080/09513590.2021.1925244. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Ren Z., et al. Lactation duration and the risk of subtypes of stroke among parous postmenopausal women from the China Kadoorie Biobank. JAMA Netw. Open. 2022;5(2) doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.0437. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Jacobson L.T., et al. Breastfeeding history and risk of stroke among parous postmenopausal women in the Women’s Health Initiative. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2018;7(17) doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.008739. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Burgess A., Eichelman E., Rhodes B. Lactation patterns in women with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: an analysis of Illinois 2012-2015 Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) data. Matern. Child Health J. 2021;25(4):666–675. doi: 10.1007/s10995-020-03069-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Horsley K., et al. Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and breastfeeding practices: a secondary analysis of data from the All Our Families Cohort. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 2022;101(8):871–879. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14378. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Spatz D.L. Ten steps for promoting and protecting breastfeeding for vulnerable infants. J. Perinat. Neonatal Nurs. 2004;18(4):385–396. doi: 10.1097/00005237-200410000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Collins I.C., et al. Breastfeeding practices among patients managed by a comprehensive cardio-obstetrics program. J. Matern. Fetal Neonatal Med. 2023;36(2) doi: 10.1080/14767058.2023.2253485. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Moretti M.E., Lee A., Ito S. Which drugs are contraindicated during breastfeeding? Practice guidelines. Can. Fam. Physician. 2000;46(9):1753–1757. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Riley L.E., et al. Improving safe and effective use of drugs in pregnancy and lactation: workshop summary. Am. J. Perinatol. 2017;34(08):826–832. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1598070. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Tigka M., et al. Medication intake as a factor for non-initiation and cessation of breastfeeding: a prospective cohort study in Greece during the COVID-19 pandemic. Children. 2023;10(3):586. doi: 10.3390/children10030586. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Colaceci S., et al. The difficulties in antihypertensive drug prescription during lactation: is the information consistent? Breastfeed. Med. 2015;10(10):468–473. doi: 10.1089/bfm.2015.0086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Banayan J., et al. Cardiogenic shock in pregnancy: analysis from the National Inpatient Sample. Hypertens. Pregnancy. 2017;36(2):117–123. doi: 10.1080/10641955.2016.1242606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Arany Z., Feldman A.M. To breastfeed or not to breastfeed with peripartum cardiomyopathy. JACC Basic Transl Sci. 2019;4(3):301–303. doi: 10.1016/j.jacbts.2019.03.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Sliwa K., et al. Current state of knowledge on aetiology, diagnosis, management, and therapy of peripartum cardiomyopathy: a position statement from the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology Working Group on peripartum cardiomyopathy. Eur. J. Heart Fail. 2010;12(8):767–778. doi: 10.1093/eurjhf/hfq120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Trongtorsak A., et al. Effects of bromocriptine in peripartum cardiomyopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Heart Fail. Rev. 2022;27(2):533–543. doi: 10.1007/s10741-021-10185-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Koczo A., et al. Breastfeeding, cellular immune activation, and myocardial recovery in peripartum cardiomyopathy. JACC Basic Transl Sci. 2019;4(3):291–300. doi: 10.1016/j.jacbts.2019.01.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2025. https://www.cdc.gov/breastfeeding-data/survey/results.html Available from: (cited 2025 June 15)
  • 105.Diaz L.E., Yee L.M., Feinglass J. Rates of breastfeeding initiation and duration in the United States: data insights from the 2016-2019 Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System. Front. Public Health. 2023;11 doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1256432. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Mahoney S.E., Taylor S.N., Forman H.P. No such thing as a free lunch: the direct marginal costs of breastfeeding. J. Perinatol. 2023;43(5):678–682. doi: 10.1038/s41372-023-01646-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Petit M., et al. Examination of factors that contribute to breastfeeding disparities and inequities for black women in the US. J. Nutr. Educ. Behav. 2021;53(11):977–986. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2021.08.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Kim S., Williams A.D. Roles of income and acculturation in the Hispanic paradox: breastfeeding among Hispanic women. Matern. Child Health J. 2023;27(6):1070–1080. doi: 10.1007/s10995-023-03643-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Singh G.K., Kogan M.D., Dee D.L. Nativity/immigrant status, race/ethnicity, and socioeconomic determinants of breastfeeding initiation and duration in the United States, 2003. Pediatrics. 2007;119(Suppl. 1):S38–S46. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-2089G. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Hawkins S.S., et al. ACA and Medicaid expansion increased breast pump claims and breastfeeding for women with public and private insurance. Womens Health Issues. 2022;32(2):114–121. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2021.10.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Shakya P., et al. Effectiveness of community-based peer support for mothers to improve their breastfeeding practices: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2017;12(5) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177434. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Dalrymple K.V., et al. Breastfeeding behaviours in women with obesity; associations with weight retention and the serum metabolome: a secondary analysis of UPBEAT. Int. J. Obes. 2024;48(10):1472–1480. doi: 10.1038/s41366-024-01576-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Murphy J., et al. Pro-inflammatory cytokines and growth factors in human milk: an exploratory analysis of racial differences to inform breast cancer etiology. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2018;172(1):209–219. doi: 10.1007/s10549-018-4907-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Mosca L., et al. Effectiveness-based guidelines for the prevention of cardiovascular disease in women—2011 update: a guideline from the American Heart Association. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2011;57(12):1404–1423. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.02.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Jiang L., et al. Estimating the population impact of hypothetical breastfeeding interventions in a low-income population in Los Angeles County: an agent-based model. PLoS One. 2020;15(4) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from American Heart Journal Plus: Cardiology Research and Practice are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES