Skip to main content
. 2025 May 2;63(4):551–569. doi: 10.1111/gwat.13489

Table 2.

Comparison Between ∆h for an Instantaneous SLR of 1 m Using Numerical and Analytic Modeling and Different Inland Boundary Conditions.

Setting Distance (m) 500 1000 1500 3000 4700
Fixed‐head inland boundary condition ∆h, analytic model (m) 0.895 0.781 0.669 0.348 0
∆h, numerical model (m) 0.902 0.786 0.673 0.412 0
Fixed‐flux inland boundary condition ∆h, analytic model (m) 0.999 0.989 0.978 0.953 0.934
∆h, numerical model (m) 1 0.999 0.989 0.967 0.943