Table 2.
Comparison Between ∆h for an Instantaneous SLR of 1 m Using Numerical and Analytic Modeling and Different Inland Boundary Conditions.
| Setting | Distance (m) | 500 | 1000 | 1500 | 3000 | 4700 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fixed‐head inland boundary condition | ∆h, analytic model (m) | 0.895 | 0.781 | 0.669 | 0.348 | 0 |
| ∆h, numerical model (m) | 0.902 | 0.786 | 0.673 | 0.412 | 0 | |
| Fixed‐flux inland boundary condition | ∆h, analytic model (m) | 0.999 | 0.989 | 0.978 | 0.953 | 0.934 |
| ∆h, numerical model (m) | 1 | 0.999 | 0.989 | 0.967 | 0.943 |