Skip to main content
Food and Waterborne Parasitology logoLink to Food and Waterborne Parasitology
. 2025 Jul 4;40:e00275. doi: 10.1016/j.fawpar.2025.e00275

Molecular detection of Dientamoeba fragilis in children in southern Xinjiang, China

Yafei Zhao a, Wenxuan Ma a, Duoduo Su a, Zhenjie Zhang a,b,c, Aiyun Zhao a,b,c, Fuchang Yu a,b,c,, Meng Qi a,b,c,
PMCID: PMC12272601  PMID: 40688528

Abstract

Dientamoeba fragilis is a common intestinal parasite in human and animals worldwide. In this study, 609 fecal samples were collected from preschool children in 11 counties in Southern Xinjiang, China. All samples were screened for D. fragilis using PCR targeting SSU rRNA gene, revealing an infection rate of 4.4 % (27/609). Seven of the 11 counties were D. fragilis-positive. The highest infection rate was 15.9 % (10/63) in Yopurga, and the lowest infection rate was 0.9 % (1/109) in Lop. Infection rates in boys and girls were 4.4 % (13/299) and 4.5 % (14/310), respectively. Genetic analysis identified all 27 positive samples as genotype 1. These results confirmed the presence of D. fragilis in children in southern Xinjiang, China. The high degree of sequence homology in the SSU rRNA gene indicates a clonal distribution pattern for D. fragilis.

Keywords: Dientamoeba fragilis, Detection, PCR, Genotypes

Highlights

  • D. fragilis infection rate in Xinjiang children: 4.4 % (27/609), highest in Yopurga (15.9 %).

  • All 27 D. fragilis isolates were identified as genotype 1 at the SSU rRNA gene.

  • No gender difference (boys 4.4 %, girls 4.5 %); significant regional variation (p = 0.001).

  • Possibility of zoonotic transmission of D. fragilis in China should not be ignored.

1. Introduction

Dientamoeba fragilis is a unicellular protozoan parasite that infects both humans and animals, including livestock, wildlife, and companion animal worldwide (Cacciò, 2018). The pathogenicity of D. fragilis in humans is a highly debated topic in the literature (Malatyali et al., 2024). While infected hosts may be asymptomatic, clinical symptoms including altered bowel motility, intermittent diarrhea, anal pruritus, abdominal pain, colitis, and irritable bowel syndrome also have been recorded (Menéndez Fernández-Miranda et al., 2025; Veraldi et al., 2022). D. fragilis infection rates vary from 0.04 % to over 86 %, depending on the population studied, region, and diagnostic procedures employed (Church et al., 2010). Studies have indicated higher infection rates in humans from low-income countries and areas with inadequate sanitation. Molecular analysis of the small subunit (SSU) rRNA gene has identified two D. fragilis genotypes: genotype 1 and genotype 2. Most human and animal isolates belong to genotype 1, while only a few samples have been identified as genotype 2 (Ercan et al., 2024). To date, limited information on D. fragilis infection rates and genetic characteristics have been reported in Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region (hereinafter Xinjiang), China. This study aimed to investigate the D. fragilis infection status in children in southern Xinjiang and provide baseline data on the molecular characteristics of this protozoan.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was conducted in accordance with the “Ethical Review of Biomedical Research Involving Humans” issued by the National Health Commission, China. The research protocol involving human participants was approved by the Ethics Review Committee of Tarim University (Approval No. IRC-TARU-20170414-10). Parents or guardians of children were informed in writing about the study's purpose and procedures, and those consenting to their children's participation signed informed consent forms.

2.2. Fecal sample collection

A total of 609 non-duplicate fecal sample were collected randomly from children (2 to 6 years old) attending kindergartens in 11 counties in Xinjiang, China, between February 2017 and January 2019 (Fig. 1). The cohort included 299 boys and 310 girls. Each sample was placed in a separated stool collection tube and transported to the laboratory at 4 °C. None of the children exhibited diarrhea or any other clinical symptoms at the time of sampling.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Geographic map showing the Xinjiang region of China and the 11 counties where samples were collected. The figure was originally designed by the authors under the software ArcGIS 10.2. The original vector diagram imported in ArcGIS was adapted from Natural Earth (http://www.naturalearthdata.com).

2.3. DNA extraction and PCR amplification

Genomic DNA was extracted from approximately 200 mg of each sample using the E.Z.N.A. Stool DNA Kit (Omega Bio-tek Inc., Norcross, GA, USA) and stored at −20 °C. PCR amplification targeting the SSU rRNA gene of D. fragilis was performed using specific primers DF1 and DF4 as previously described (Peek et al., 2004), generating a target fragments of ∼662 bp. Negative controls (nuclease-free water) and positive controls (human-derived ST3) were included in the PCR amplification.

2.4. Sequencing and phylogenetic analysis

All positive amplicons were sent to Youkang Biotechnology Co., Ltd., (Xinjiang, China) for sequencing. Raw sequence data were edited using DNASTAR Lasergene EditSeq software (version 7.1.0; http://www.dnastar.com/). Processed sequences were aligned using ClustalX (version 2.1; http://www.clustal.org/) with reference sequences retrieved from GenBank. A phylogenetic tree was constructed in MEGA11 using the Neighbor-Joining (NJ) method based on the Kimura 2-parameter model to analyze the genetic relationships of D. fragilis. The robustness of clusters was assessed using 1000 replicates; only branch support values above 50 % were retained. Sequences generated in this study were deposited in the GenBank database under accession numbers PV186784 and PV186785.

2.5. Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were performed with the software IBM SPSS Statistics (www.ibm.com/products/spssstatistics). Fisher's exact test was used to study the difference of the infection rates. A two-sided p-value <0.05 was deemed significant.

3. Results and discussion

Of the 609 samples tested, 27 were D. fragilis-positive, yielding an infection rate of 4.4 % (27/609) (Table 1). This rate is higher than those reported in children in Pakistan (1.3 %, 2/150) (Bukhari et al., 2023), Gabon (4.0 %, 4/100) (Oyegue-Liabagui et al., 2020), Portugal (2.8 %, 4/144) (Júlio et al., 2015) and Vietnam (4.2 %, 2/48) (Ögren et al., 2016). However, it is lower than rates in children in Turkey (8.0 %, 4/50) (Özkan-Ahmetoğlu et al., 2023), Brazil (10.3 %, 16/156) (Oliveira-Arbex et al., 2021), Netherlands (15.3 %, 9/59) (Holtman et al., 2017), Spain (29.8 %, 17/57) (Montraveta-Querol et al., 2022), and Sweden (68.63 %, 70/102) (Ögren et al., 2015). Detection rates may vary depending on the methods used. Infection rates in China are likely underestimated due to the limited number of PCR-based studies on D. fragilis.

Table 1.

Infection rate and genotype of D. fragilis in children in Southern Xinjiang.

Group No. positives/ No. samples Prevalence 95 % CI (%) p-value Genotype (n)
Sampling site
 Yopurga 10/63 15.9 % 6.1–25.7 Genotype 1 (10)
 Yecheng 8/89 9.0 % 2.5–15.5 0.212 Genotype 1 (8)
 Hotan 4/80 5.0 % 0–10.4 0.045 Genotype 1 (4)
 Shufu 2/48 4.2 % 0–10.9 0.065 Genotype 1 (2)
 Poskam 1/35 2.9 % 0–9.8 <0.001 Genotype 1 (1)
 Pishan 1/37 2.7 % 0–9.3 <0.001 Genotype 1 (1)
 Lop 1/109 0.9 % 0–3.2 <0.001 Genotype 1 (1)
 Tumushuke 0/62 0
 Payzawat 0/25 0
 Kuqa 0/38 0
 Baicheng 0/23 0
 Tota 27/609 4.4 % 2.7–6.2 <0.001 Genotype 1 (27)
Age (months)
 0–23 2/62 3.2 % 0–8.4 0.883 Genotype 1 (12)
 24–47 11/235 4.7 % 1.8–7.6 0.999 Genotype 1 (11)
 48–72 14/312 4.5 % 2.0–6.9 0.999 Genotype 1 (14)
Gender
 Female 14/310 4.5 % 2.0–6.9 Genotype 1 (14)
 Male 13/299 4.4 % 1.9–6.8 0.999 Genotype 1 (13)

Infection rates varied significantly among the seven positive counties, ranging from 0.9 % to 15.9 %. The highest infection rate was in Yopurga (15.9 %, 10/63), and the lowest was in Lop (0.9 %, 1/109). No D. fragilis infection was detected in children from the counties of Tumushuke, Payzawat, Baicheng, or Kuqa. The infection rate was 4.4 % (13/299) in boys and 4.5 % (14/310) in girls; no significant difference (p > 0.05) was observed between genders. Similar non-significant findings have been observed in children in Turkey (Özkan-Ahmetoğlu et al., 2023), Italy (Calderaro et al., 2014), and Portugal (Júlio et al., 2015), suggesting no significant association between the occurrence of D. fragilis and gender.

Although the role of D. fragilis in causing gastrointestinal pathology remains controversial, multiple studies describe clinical symptoms attributable to its infection (Menéndez Fernández-Miranda et al., 2025), with symptom duration ranging from days to two years. All children in this study were asymptomatic at the time of sampling. Without an appropriate control group, we cannot definitively confirm the pathogenicity of the D. fragilis strains detected in children in Xinjiang, China.

Sequencing of the 27 positive amplicons revealed that all D. fragilis isolates belonged to genotype 1. Two sequence types were identified (designated genotype 1a and genotype 1b) differing by only one single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) at position 189 of the SSU rRNA gene (C/T substitution). Genotype 1a showed 100 % homology to JQ677149 (derived from human in the UK), and genotype 1b were showed 100 % homology to JQ677147 (derived from human in the UK) (Fig. 2). To date, two D. fragilis genotypes have been identified. Genotype 1 predominates in both symptomatic and asymptomatic populations across different age groups, while genotype 2 has been rarely documented and has primarily been isolated from pigs (Menéndez Fernández-Miranda et al., 2025). Notably, genotype 2 was recently reported in children from low-income neighborhoods in São Paulo, Brazil (Oliveira-Arbex et al., 2021). The factors influencing the genetic diversity of D. fragilis remain unclear.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Phylogenetic relationships among representative sequences of the Dientamoeba fragilis small subunit ribosomal RNA (SSU rRNA) genes obtained from China, using the neighbor-joining method. Bootstrap values greater than 50 % from 1000 pseudo replicates are shown. Isolates identified in this study are indicated by filled triangles.

Genotype 1 of D. fragilis has also been detected as the dominant or sole genotype in various animals, including pigs, budgerigars, and cattle (Cacciò et al., 2012; Yetismis et al., 2022; Yildiz and Erdem Aynur, 2022). Consequently, the zoonotic potential of this parasite has become a topic of increasing research interest. A recent study identified D. fragilis in houseflies, with all positive isolates assigned to genotype 1 based on phylogenetic analysis (Ercan et al., 2024). A growing consensus suggests possible cross-species transmission of D. fragilis, particularly since a cyst stage has been described (Munasinghe et al., 2013) and the fecal-oral route is recognized as the primary transmission route. Therefore, the genotype 1 D. fragilis detected in children may originate from livestock, pets, or houseflies. Because no direct evidence was found in this study, this hypothesis is speculative and requires confirmation through future studies involving animal and environmental samples.

4. Conclusions

The data presented here provide insights into the prevalence and genetic diversity of D. fragilis infections in asymptomatic young children in Xinjiang, China. Our findings confirm the presence of D. fragilis in this population was not associated with clinical symptoms. The genetic homogeneity observed suggests a clonal distribution pattern.

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Yafei Zhao: Writing – original draft, Validation, Investigation, Formal analysis, Data curation. Wenxuan Ma: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft, Methodology, Conceptualization. Duoduo Su: Writing – review & editing, Supervision, Investigation, Data curation. Zhenjie Zhang: Writing – review & editing, Validation, Supervision, Software. Aiyun Zhao: Methodology, Investigation, Formal analysis, Data curation, Conceptualization. Fuchang Yu: Writing – review & editing, Supervision, Project administration, Investigation, Data curation, Conceptualization. Meng Qi: Writing – review & editing, Supervision, Project administration, Investigation, Funding acquisition, Data curation, Conceptualization.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Program for Young and Middle-aged Leading Science, Technology, and Innovation of Xinjiang Production & Construction Corps (2018CB034).

Contributor Information

Fuchang Yu, Email: yuf0630@taru.edu.cn.

Meng Qi, Email: 120150006@taru.edu.cn.

Data availability

Representative nucleotide sequences generated in this study were deposited in the GenBank database under the Accession Numbers PV186784 and PV186785.

References

  1. Bukhari A.A., Bukhari A.A., Akram A., Naeem N., Zafar A.F., Arshad G. Incidence of intestinal parasites in children with chronic spontaneous urticaria. Biol. Clin. Sci. Res. J. 2023;2023(1):454. doi: 10.54112/bcsrj.v2023i1.454. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cacciò S.M. Molecular epidemiology of Dientamoeba fragilis. Acta Trop. 2018;184:73–77. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2017.06.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cacciò S.M., Sannella A.R., Manuali E., Tosini F., Sensi M., Crotti D., et al. Pigs as natural hosts of Dientamoeba fragilis genotypes found in humans. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2012;18(5):838–841. doi: 10.3201/eid1805.111093. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Calderaro A., Montecchini S., Rossi S., Gorrini C., De Conto F., Medici M.C., et al. Intestinal parasitoses in a tertiary-care hospital located in a non-endemic setting during 2006-2010. BMC Infect. Dis. 2014;14:264. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-14-264. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Church C., Neill A., Schotthoefer A.M. Intestinal infections in humans in the Rocky Mountain region, United States. J. Parasitol. 2010;96(1):194–196. doi: 10.1645/GE-2229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ercan N., Yildirim A., Duzlu O. Molecular detection and genotyping of Dientamoeba fragilis and Blastocystis sp. in housefly Musca domestica (Diptera: Muscidae): first report for Dientamoeba fragilis. Parasitol. Res. 2024;123(4):183. doi: 10.1007/s00436-024-08202-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Malatyali E., Guclu O., Yildiz I., Ertug S., Ertabaklar H. The low genetic diversity of Dientamoeba fragilis isolates in Southwest Turkey and analysis of clinical findings. Acta Parasitol. 2024;69(2024):1576–1586. doi: 10.1007/s11686-024-00896-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Holtman G.A., Kranenberg J.J., Blanker M.H., Ott A., Lisman-van Leeuwen Y., Berger M.Y. Dientamoeba fragilis colonization is not associated with gastrointestinal symptoms in children at primary care level. Fam. Pract. 2017;34(1):25–29. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmw111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Júlio C., Furtado C., Rocha R., Escobar C., Brito M.J., Oleastro M. Detection of Dientamoeba fragilis in Portuguese children with acute gastroenteritis between 2011 and 2013. Parasitology. 2015;142(11):1398–1403. doi: 10.1017/S0031182015000906. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Menéndez Fernández-Miranda C., Fernández-Suárez J., García Pérez A., Boga J.A., Rodríguez-Pérez M., Rodríguez-Guardado A. Dientamoeba fragilis: an emerging pathogen. Enferm. Infec. Micr. Cl. 2025;43(4):219–226. doi: 10.1016/j.eimce.2025.03.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Montraveta-Querol M., Bovo M.V., Roig-Abraham N., Romaní N., Alcaraz A., Fernández-Rivas G. Should Dientamoeba fragillis be looked for in pediatric digestive pathology of an unknown cause? A proposed pilot case-control study. Enferm. Infec. Micr. Cl. 2022;40(8):436–440. doi: 10.1016/j.eimce.2022.03.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Munasinghe V.S., Vella N.G.F., Ellis J.T., Windsor P.A., Stark D. Cyst formation and faecal-oral transmission of Dientamoeba fragilis--the missing link in the life cycle of an emerging pathogen. Int. J. Parasitol. 2013;43(11):879–883. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2013.06.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Ögren J., Dienus O., Löfgren S., Einemo I.M., Iveroth P., Matussek A. Dientamoeba fragilis prevalence coincides with gastrointestinal symptoms in children less than 11 years old in Sweden. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2015;34(10):1995–1998. doi: 10.1007/s10096-015-2442-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Ögren J., Van Nguyen S., Nguyen M.K., Dimberg J., Matussek A. Prevalence of Dientamoeba fragilis, Giardia duodenalis, Entamoeba histolytica/dispar, and Cryptosporidium spp in Da Nang, Vietnam, detected by a multiplex real-time PCR. APMIS. 2016;124(6):529–533. doi: 10.1111/apm.12535. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Oliveira-Arbex A.P., David É.B., Cacciò S.M., Fonseca C.R.B., Martin J.G., Kurokawa C.S., et al. Prevalence and genetic characterization of Dientamoeba fragilis in asymptomatic children attending daycare centers. Rev. Inst. Med. Trop. Sao Paulo. 2021;63 doi: 10.1590/S1678-9946202163039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Oyegue-Liabagui S.L., Ndjangangoye N.K., Kouna L.C., Lekolo G.M., Mounioko F., Kwedi Nolna S., et al. Molecular prevalence of intestinal parasites infections in children with diarrhea in Franceville, Southeast of Gabon. BMC Infect. Dis. 2020;20(1):350. doi: 10.1186/s12879-020-05071-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Özkan-Ahmetoğlu M., Demirel F., Taşar M.A., Dinç B., Sarzhanov F., Dogruman-Al F. Investigation of intestinal parasites by conventional and molecular methods in children with gastrointestinal system complaints. Parasitol. Res. 2023;122(6):1361–1370. doi: 10.1007/s00436-023-07836-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Peek R., Reedeker F.R., van Gool T. Direct amplification and genotyping of Dientamoeba fragilis from human stool specimens. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2004;42(2):631–635. doi: 10.1128/jcm.42.2.631-635.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Veraldi S., Maronese C.A., Nazzaro G., Daprai L. Anal pruritus caused by Dientamoeba fragilis. Travel Med. Infect. Dis. 2022;48 doi: 10.1016/j.tmaid.2022.102319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Yetismis G., Yildirim A., Pekmezci D., Duzlu O., Ciloglu A., Onder Z., et al. First report and genotyping of Dientamoeba fragilis in pet budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus), with zoonotic importance. Zoonoses Public Health. 2022;69(5):572–578. doi: 10.1111/zph.12949. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Yildiz İ., Erdem Aynur Z. First detection and molecular characterization of Dientamoeba fragilis in cattle. Zoonoses Public Health. 2022;69(8):897–903. doi: 10.1111/zph.12986. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Representative nucleotide sequences generated in this study were deposited in the GenBank database under the Accession Numbers PV186784 and PV186785.


Articles from Food and Waterborne Parasitology are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES