Skip to main content
. 2025 Mar 13;7(3):101113. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2025.101113

Table 2.

Systematic Review Clinical Information

Source History Motion Strength Special Tests Imaging Surgical Indications
Boileau et al.,1 2009 Pain at rest, pain with overhead activity, failed medication and physical therapy for ≥6 mo NR NR NR CT, MRA, or DA for type II SLAP injury but not consistent across all patients Type II SLAP injury
Gottschalk et al.,2 2014 NR NR NR NR DA Type II or IV SLAP injury
Gupta et al.,3 2015 Tenderness to palpation in groove, failed medication and physical therapy NR NR NR MRI and DA Consideration for BT based on clinical/imaging evidence of tendinitis such as groove pain or fluid in sheath
Pogorzelski et al.,4 2018 NR NR NR NR DA Type II SLAP injury had to be present for BT to be performed
Griffin et al.,5 2019 Failed physical therapy and inability to return to sport, bicipital groove pain NR NR NR MRI with tendon inflammation and DA Signs of synovitis, hypertrophy, and instability or biceps-labral complex injury
Lin et al.,6 2021 NR NR NR NR NR BT or transfer per surgeon preference; SLAP repair performed with BT if superior labral tissue was unstable after biceps was detached to prevent bucket handling and propagation of labral tear
Hurley et al.,7 2022 NR NR NR NR NR Patient decided which procedure preoperatively
Lacheta et al.,8 2022 Persistent pain, failed physical therapy Impaired function Loss of strength Active compression and Yergason tests Radiologic signs of type II SLAP injury only and confirmed with DA (excluded pathology of long head of biceps) Tissue quality of superior labrum decided procedure; SLAP repair used for solid impressed bucket-handle tear; BT used for degenerative multiple fraying of superior labrum
Lorentz et al.,9 2022 NR NR NR NR MRI and DA Pathology identified at biceps-labral complex
Rothermich et al.,10 2023 NR NR NR NR Advanced imaging (type not specified) BT used when pathology identified at biceps-labral complex—no specifics provided
Waterman et al.,11 2023 Tenderness to palpation in groove Motion obtained but not used to make diagnosis NR Active compression, modified dynamic labral shear, and crank tests MRI for SLAP injury and DA Anterior type IIa SLAP injury involving biceps anchor; attenuated/poor-quality biceps-labral tissue, structural long head of biceps pathology, and groove pain

BT, biceps tenodesis; CT, computed tomography; DA, diagnostic arthroscopy; MRA, magnetic resonance arthrography; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; NR, not reported.