Skip to main content
. 2025 Jul;227(1):473–480. doi: 10.1192/bjp.2025.84

Table 2.

Efficacy analyses

Population Assessment TSST VQW-765
(n = 116)
Placebo
(n = 114)
Difference (95% CI) P-value
Mean s.d. Mean s.d.
ITT SUDS Pre-dose 34.66 23.20 37.02 23.42
Resting 47.76 23.07 51.15 24.78 −2.8 (−8.70, 3.14) 0.1775
Anticipation 52.96 22.25 56.90 21.90 −3.3 (−8.83, 2.23) 0.1206
Performancea 58.6 23.96 62.26 22.40 −3.2 (−9.13, 2.73) 0.1443
CGI-C Post-TSSTa 3.6 1.12 3.6 1.06 −0 (−0.29, 0.23) 0.4038
PGI-C Post-TSSTa 3.4 1.14 3.5 1.08 −0 (−0.33, 0.25) 0.3993

SUDS, Subjective Units of Distress Scale; TSST, Trier Social Stress Test; CGI-C, Clinician Global Impression of Change; PGI-C, Patient Global Impression of Change; ITT, intention-to-treat; 50% quantile, middle 50% quantiles of VQW-765 plasma concentration; LSAS, Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale. Difference (95% CI), least-square mean difference (95% CI).

a.

Primary efficacy analysis.

b.

Secondary efficacy analysis.