Table 2.
Spatial dynamics of suitable habitats for M. officinalis in response to diverse future climate scenarios (compared to the current range).
| Period | Area (104 km2) | Rate of change (%) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stability | Contraction | Expansion | Stability | Contraction | Expansion | |
| 2050s-SSP1-2.6 | 295.19 | 19.29 | 56.72 | 79.52 | 5.20 | 15.28 |
| 2070s-SSP1-2.6 | 291.93 | 22.57 | 63.65 | 77.20 | 5.97 | 16.83 |
| 2090s-SSP1-2.6 | 293.74 | 20.76 | 71.76 | 76.05 | 5.37 | 18.58 |
| 2050s-SSP3-7.0 | 283.64 | 30.87 | 60.41 | 75.65 | 8.23 | 16.11 |
| 2070s-SSP3-7.0 | 282.15 | 32.33 | 138.25 | 62.32 | 7.14 | 30.54 |
| 2090s-SSP3-7.0 | 274.69 | 39.78 | 181.31 | 55.41 | 8.02 | 36.57 |
| 2050s-SSP5-8.5 | 288.95 | 25.52 | 90.27 | 71.39 | 6.31 | 22.30 |
| 2070s-SSP5-8.5 | 274.72 | 39.76 | 154.68 | 58.56 | 8.47 | 32.97 |
| 2090s-SSP5-8.5 | 266.17 | 48.30 | 177.82 | 54.07 | 9.81 | 36.12 |