Fig. 9. Upregulation of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) expression in pancreatic α cells during pregnancy.
a Immunofluorescence of human pancreatic sections (IHC-IF) from pregnant women at different gestational ages and a non-pregnant control sample. The GLP-1 signal is observed in α cells, overlapping with glucagon. Both α cells surrounding pancreatic ducts and those within islets are shown. The grayscale images represent the individual channels for the GLP-1, glucagon and insulin. GLP-1 (green), glucagon (yellow), and insulin (magenta) are shown in the composite merged image. Scale bar = 200 µm. Representative images from four donors are shown; similar results were observed across the 14 biological replicates, each representing an independent human donor. b, c Images demonstrating the use of the imaging pipeline to quantify GLP-1 area and signal intensity. The labelling of GLP-1 labelled α cells by IHC-IF was followed by thresholding of the GLP-1 positive signal. An example of the thresholded region (cyan) identifying GLP-1 positive signal is shown for the (b) GLP-1 channel (green) and (c) composite merged image (GLP-1 [green], glucagon [yellow] and insulin [magenta]). d–h Quantitative comparisons of GLP-1 between pregnant and non-pregnant women for several quantified islet measures. The data includes comparisons for d) fractional area (measured area as a percentage of total tissue area) and (e) mean area (measured area divided by number of islets per tissue section). Additionally, comparisons of the proportions of GLP-1 positive area relative to (f) whole islets (measured area as a percentage of total whole islet area) and h) (g) relative to α cell area (measured area as a percentage of α cell area) are shown. h Signal intensity of GLP-1 detected in α cells of pregnant women compared to non-pregnant controls. Symbols in each figure correspond to individual donors as indicated in Supp. Data S1. The pregnant group (n = 7 biological replicates) was compared to the non-pregnant control group (n = 7 biological replicates). Each biological replicate represents an independent human donor. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. Normally distributed data were analysed using a two-sided unpaired Student’s t-test; non-parametric data were analysed using a two-sided Mann–Whitney test. Exact P values for each comparison are shown in the figure. Statistical significance was defined as P < 0.05. * GA gestational age, wks weeks.
