Skip to main content
Medicine logoLink to Medicine
. 2025 Jul 18;104(29):e43084. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000043084

Application of blood flow restriction training in adolescents: A narrative review

Zhen-Lei Chen a,*, Tian-Shu Zhao b, Shuang-Feng Ren b, Si-Zhuo Zhang c, Ji-Lai Xu d, You-Qing Shen a, Li-Ping Huang b
PMCID: PMC12282689  PMID: 40696603

Abstract

Blood flow restriction training (BFRT) involves applying external compression to the limbs to restrict venous blood return during low-intensity exercise, thereby promoting improvements in muscle mass and strength. Originally developed decades ago, BFRT has gained renewed interest in recent years, with applications spanning rehabilitation medicine, aerospace, and general fitness. However, its use in adolescents remains limited and under-researched. This narrative review aims to summarize the current understanding of the effects, mechanisms, and practical applications of BFRT in adolescents, with a focus on muscle health, physical performance, and training safety. A comprehensive review of recent literature was conducted, focusing on BFRT-related physiological mechanisms, including metabolic stress, anabolic hormone responses, muscle fiber recruitment, protein synthesis regulation, myostatin suppression, and cell swelling. Relevant studies on adolescent populations were analyzed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of BFRT in this age group. BFRT appears to promote muscle hypertrophy, strength, endurance, and neuromuscular adaptations in adolescents, with reduced injury risk compared to high-load training. Individualized arterial occlusion pressure settings enhance both the safety and effectiveness of BFRT. Applications span general fitness, athletic performance enhancement, and injury rehabilitation. BFRT offers a promising, low-risk alternative to traditional resistance training for adolescents, supporting safe and effective physical development. Its integration into youth fitness and rehabilitation programs by educators, healthcare providers, and sports organizations may offer substantial benefits for adolescent health and performance.

Keywords: adolescents, blood flow restriction training, low-load exercise, physical health, strength training

1. Introduction

A recent survey in China highlighted that, during the COVID-19 pandemic, young adolescents experienced increased screen time and inadequate physical activity due to prolonged periods at home. More than half of Chinese youth temporarily adopted an unhealthy lifestyle marked by sedentary behaviors and poor physical activity levels.[1] This physical inactivity poses risks to the growth, development, and mental health of adolescents (defined as individuals aged 10–19 years according to the World Health Organization, inclusive of both sexes), reinforcing the need for safe and effective physical exercise options specifically suited to this age group. However, traditional high-load strength training often presents challenges for adolescents due to their unique physiological needs, limited neuromuscular control, and increased susceptibility to injury from high-impact or high-resistance exercises. Research indicates that traditional training methods can sometimes lead to improper movement patterns and heightened injury risks, potentially limiting their effectiveness in improving overall physical fitness.[2]

Blood flow restriction training (BFRT) has emerged as a potentially safer alternative that may better meet adolescents’ needs by providing low-load resistance with high fitness benefits.[3] BFRT involves applying external compression to the limbs to restrict venous blood flow, creating a hypoxic environment that stimulates muscle hypertrophy and strength gain, which are typically observed with high-load training.[4] Importantly, this low-load characteristics of BFRT may reduce the risk of training-related injuries in adolescents, making it a potentially more suitable option for younger populations. Studies have suggested that BFRT may offer a higher benefit-to-risk ratio compared to traditional strength training due to its lower injury risk and comparable strength gains at reduced intensities.[4]

Initially developed as “KAATSU training” (a term now associated with a specific company and trademarked equipment), BFRT is a technique integrated into existing exercise protocols rather than a standalone exercise method.[5] It is often applied with low-load interval training, leveraging the hypoxic environment to induce muscle adaptation similar to high-load exercises.[6] BFRT has been widely studied in competitive sports and medical rehabilitation, showing effectiveness in improving muscle strength, endurance, and cardiovascular fitness in adults and aiding rehabilitation across musculoskeletal, neurological, and cardiovascular domains.[5,7,8] However, research on BFRT’s safety and efficacy specifically in adolescents – particularly nonathlete – remain limited. Given adolescents’ unique growth and developmental considerations, it is essential to explore BFRT’s specific mechanisms and applications for this age group.

This study aimed to address this gap by investigating BFRT’s potential benefits and mechanisms in adolescents. We explore BFRT’s mechanisms of action and its practical applications for improving adolescent fitness, aiming to provide theoretical support and guidance for its implementation in this population.

2. The mechanism of BFRT in adolescents

BFRT involves applying pressure to restrict venous blood flow in the limbs, inducing localized muscle ischemia and hypoxia. This condition leads to the accumulation of metabolites, a decrease in pH, and an increase in metabolic stress,[9,10] all of which stimulate muscle growth and improve function.[11] While BFRT has been studied primarily in adults, its impact on adolescents, who are still in critical stages of physical development, may differ due to their unique hormonal and growth characteristics. This section aimed to review the mechanisms of BFRT, focusing on how these may apply to adolescents specifically (Fig. 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Mechanisms of BFRT in promoting muscle hypertrophy and strength increase. BFRT = blood flow restriction training.

2.1. Metabolic stress and hormone response

BFRT is known to induce significant metabolic stress, which, in turn, triggers the release of growth hormone (GH)[12] and insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1),[13] both crucial for muscle muscle development and bone growth in adolescents.[14] Therefore, the metabolic stress induced by BFRT is particularly relevant for adolescents, as it can mimic the hormonal responses typical of high-load training but with reduced risk.

Although most research on GH and IGF-1 responses in BFRT focuses on adults, studies have demonstrated that increases in these hormones correlate with muscle cross-sectional area enhancement.[15] In adolescents, this mechanism could similarly stimulate muscle hypertrophy and strength gains. Further research is warranted to confirm whether the hormonal responses to low-load BFRT in adolescents can effectively support healthy muscle and skeletal development.

2.2. Regulation of protein synthesis via the mTOR pathway

Protein synthesis regulation is crucial to BFRT-induced muscle adaptation, largely through the activation of the mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway, which promotes protein synthesis and inhibits protein breakdown.[16] This pathway is influenced by key proteins like S6 kinase 1 and myostatin (MSTN), both involved in muscle growth.[17,18] Under low-intensity conditions, BFRT increases phosphorylation of SK61, thereby enhancing protein synthesis.[19] For adolescents, whose musculoskeletal systems are still developing, this low-intensity BFRT mechanism offers an effective means of supporting muscle growth without imposing the higher mechanical load typically associated with conventional resistance training, thus presenting a low-risk, high-benefit training modality. In addition, MSTN acts as a negative regulator of skeletal muscle growth, primarily by inhibiting the proliferation of myoblasts.[20] BFRT has been shown to reduce MSTN signaling, further promoting muscle hypertrophy. Consequently, the mTOR signaling is particularly relevant in adolescents, whose skeletal muscle growth depends on sustained protein synthesis to support ongoing development.

2.3. Muscle fiber recruitment and neural adaptation

Under normal circumstances, muscle contraction first recruits slow-twitch muscle fibers (type I) and subsequently fast-twitch muscle fibers (type II). BFRT, by inducing hypoxia and metabolite accumulation, activates group III/IV afferent neurons, accelerating the recruitment of type II fibers even under low-load conditions.[21] This neural adaptation is particularly advantageous for adolescents, as high-load training may increase their risk of musculoskeletal injuries due to their developing musculoskeletal systems.[22]

In adolescents, low-load BFRT can thus achieve type II muscle fiber recruitment comparable to that seen in high-load training while minimizing injury risk.[23] This higher neural activity at low-intensity supports efficient muscle hypertrophy in adolescents, offering both safety and effectiveness for this age group.

2.4. Cell swelling and anabolic response

The venous blood flow restriction induced by BFRT may also cause cellular swelling response due to an increased osmotic gradient from metabolite accumulation, resulting in fluid influx into muscle cells.[24] This cell swelling activates the mTOR signaling pathway, promoting an anabolic response and inhibiting catabolism.[19]

For adolescents, the cell swelling response could trigger metabolic adaptations similar to those produced by high-load training, potentially increasing muscle cross-sectional area. However, it is essential to consider the developmental stage of each individual, as the cellular and tissue responses to mechanical stress in adolescents may differ from those in adults. Future studies should explore the specific effects of cell swelling in adolescent BFRT to ensure both its safety and efficacy.

3. Effects of BFRT on adolescent muscle

The adolescents period, defined by the World Health Organization as ages 10 to 19, is crucial for physical and mental development during which training can positively or negatively impact adolescents’ growth depending on training intensity and type.[25] Adolescence is often categorized into early (10–14 years) and late (15–19 years) stages, each associated with distinct hormonal profiles, musculoskeletal maturation, and neuromuscular coordination. These differences may influence how adolescents respond to various training interventions. It is essential that exercise protocols respect developmental stages to avoid injury or overtraining. BFRT is particularly promising for adolescents as it offers muscle hypertrophy, strength, and endurance improvements at low loads, reducing the risk of strain and injury. By combining low load, short duration, and high efficiency, BFRT may provide a safer alternative to traditional resistance training in promoting adolescent muscle fitness.

3.1. Muscle hypertrophy

Muscle hypertrophy, or the increase in muscle cross-sectional area, depends on muscle fiber number and thickness. BFRT has been shown to significantly increase the circumference and cross-sectional area of upper arm and thigh.[26] Similar effects of BFRT observed in youth athletes, demonstrating its applicability to adolescent muscle development.[27] For instance, a study conducted on college students showed a 10% increase in rectus femoris and medialis muscle thickness after 12 weeks of BFRT.[28] However, other studies suggest that BFRT needs to be conducted for more than 8 weeks to induce noticeable muscle adaptations, which should be considered when designing adolescent training programs.[29]

3.2. Muscle strength

Muscle strength, typically measured by maximum force output, can also be enhanced with BFRT even at low intensities. The American College of Sports Medicine recommends a load of 60% to 70% of 1-repetition maximum for strength development.[30] However, BFRT can effectively improve muscle strength at intensities below 40% 1-repetition maximum,[31] which is crucial for adolescents, whose developing skeletal and muscular systems are more susceptible to damage from high-intensity loads. Studies analyzing the effects of BFRT on various muscle groups, including the elbow flexion, knee extension, and core muscles, found that BFRT significantly improves overall strength, even in low-load conditions.[26] These findings support the use of BFRT as a supplemental to traditional resistance training for adolescents, offering strength improvements without exposing them to higher mechanical loads and potential injury.

3.3. Muscular endurance

Muscular endurance refers to the ability to sustain muscle activity over time. BFRT has been shown to enhance endurance by increasing muscle hypertrophy and strength.[32] For example, studies combining BFRT with rotator cuff exercises has found superior improvements in shoulder and arm endurance and mass compared to conventional training.[33] In youth athletes, such as football players, BFRT incorporated into sport-specific conditioning programs has been associated with improved endurance and reduced training volume.[34]

However, some studies have reported limited effects of BFRT on endurance during the warm-up phases, highlighting the need for further research to optimize BFRT for endurance training in adolescents.[35,36] Future studies should systematically evaluate how training frequency, intensity, and duration of BFRT affect endurance, particularly in adolescent athletes who may benefit from BFRT’s lower mechanical load yet high adaptation potential.

3.4. Muscle activation and fatigue

BFRT training promotes neuromuscular adaptations by increasing muscle activation at low intensities.[37] This is particularly beneficial for adolescents, as high-intensity training could pose a risk to their developing musculoskeletal systems. Low-intensity BFRT increases activation of key muscles, such as the triceps and anterior deltoid, while also eliciting higher subjective fatigue due to the increased neural engagement and metabolic stress associated with blood flow restriction.[38,39] Studies have demonstrated that BFRT-induced muscle activation benefits both restricted and unrestricted muscle areas, leading to functional performance gains across multiple muscle groups.[4042]

Recent research on high-level athletes has shown that BFRT, particularly with compression settings around 50% of arterial occlusion pressure (AOP), optimizes muscle activation while reducing mechanical strain on joints, making it a practical option for adolescent training and injury prevention.[43] These findings support BFRT as a tool for enhancing muscle activation in adolescents, promoting performance and functional gains without excessive loading.

While current evidence on BFRT in adolescents rarely addresses sex-specific responses, it is important to consider potential physiological differences between male and female adolescents – such as differences in hormonal fluctuations, muscle mass distribution, and recovery patterns – which may influence training adaptations. Future research should explore these sex-based differences to further individualize and optimize BFRT protocols for both boys and girls.

4. BFRT implementation pathway for adolescent

Given the unique physiological characteristics of adolescents, an individualized BFRT protocol is essential to ensure both effectiveness and safety. This implementation pathway for BFRT in adolescents can be divided into 3 main categories: physical health improvement, athletic performance enhancement, and sports injury rehabilitation. Table 1 provides individualized recommendations based on AOP for different adolescent populations to optimize training benefits.

Table 1.

Individualized BFRT program recommendations for adolescents based on AOP.

Target population Load (% 1RM) Pressure (% AOP) Pressurized site Frequency/duration Training program
Healthy college students 20 40%–60% Proximal thigh 3 times/wk; 4 sets/time; 12 wk Half squat
Obesity 20 40% Brachial/femoral artery 3 times/wk; 4 sets/time; 18 wk Half squat; Lateral raise
Upper-body training 40 40%–50% Proximal upper arm 3 times/wk; 30 min/time; 8 wk Flat bench press; Barbell pull-up
Lower-body training 20 50% Upper 1/3 of thigh 3 times/wk; 20–30 min/session; 6 wk Vertical jump; Half squat; Sprint running
Knee injury rehabilitation 30 50%–70% Proximal thigh 3 times/wk; 8 wk Knee flexion/extension; Straight leg raise; Quadriceps isometric contraction
Ankle injury rehabilitation 25–50 50% Above the knee 3 times/wk; 6 wk Ankle valgus; Dorsiflexion training

1RM = 1-repetition maximum, AOP = arterial occlusion pressure, BFRT = blood flow restriction training.

4.1. Applications for enhancing physical health

Safeguarding optimal physical health is critical during adolescence and includes key fitness components like endurance, strength, and flexibility. Studies have shown that BFRT, when combined with low-load exercise, significantly enhances skeletal muscle mass and improves body composition.[44,45] For example, a randomized controlled trial among obese college students found that combining BFRT with cycling (set at 40% maximum oxygen uptake) improved indicators such as body fat percentage, blood lipids, and other serum markers, which demonstrates the value of BFRT for managing health and fitness in adolescents, particularly in post-pandemic settings where physical inactivity has been an issue.[46]

For adolescents aiming to reduce body fat, BFRT targeting key areas like the brachial and femoral arteries at intensities around 40% of AOP, combined with exercises such as 20% 1RM half squat and lateral hip abduction raises, may be beneficial. Conversely, for healthy adolescents seeking to enhance muscle strength and endurance, the AOP percentage may be gradually increased to 50% to 60%. This gradual adjustment allows flexibility in BFRT protocols to accommodate different fitness goals among adolescents.

4.2. Applications for enhancing athletic performance

BFRT has shown promising results in improving specific performance attributes critical to athletic success.[47] Evidence indicates that BFRT supports muscle hypertrophy and function, contributing to enhanced athletic performance. For instance, Yasuda et al have found that long-term BFRT – defined as a 12-week intervention – led to substantial increases in muscle cross-sectional area and strength without diminished effects over time or load increases.[4749] In recent years, other studies further support BFRT’s efficacy in enhancing key performance indicators, such as sprint speed, vertical jump height, and agility, which are crucial for sports requiring explosive power and endurance like tennis and handball.[8,35,50]

To maximize BFRT’s effectiveness for adolescent athletes, specific compression settings are recommended based on sport type. For upper-body sports (such as badminton, table tennis, and volleyball), BFRT with 40% to 50% AOP has been effective in increasing strength and endurance in target muscles. For lower-body sports (such as football and sprinting), a 50% AOP setting on the upper thigh has been shown to improve explosive strength, agility, and overall performance. These sport-specific BFRT applications offer a versatile, lower-risk alternative to high-load resistance training, which can pose injury risks to the developing musculoskeletal system of adolescents.

4.3. Applications for sports injury rehabilitation

Adolescents recovering from sports injuries often face challenges such as muscle weakness and atrophy, especially in musculoskeletal injuries. BFRT offers a viable method for rehabilitation by enhancing muscle strength without excessive load on healing tissues. Clinical studies have demonstrated that low-load BFRT effectively restores quadriceps strength and endurance after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, while also significantly alleviating pain and reducing joint effusion.[51,52] Hughes et al[51] also reported that BFRT provided greater pain relief and muscle adaptation compared to traditional methods, highlighting its utility for both injured and recovering patients.

Moreover, BFRT has been applied effectively in cases of chronic ankle injury, tendinopathy, and shoulder injuries, supporting muscle adaptation during rehabilitation and facilitating safe, efficient recovery.[53,54] For adolescent rehabilitation, BFRT with 50% to 70% of AOP can effectively prevent joint contracture, maintain muscle function, and support a safe return to physical activity. With its low-risk profile, BFRT offers a tailored approach for adolescent rehabilitation, helping young athletes maintain and regain strength and function without straining healing tissues.

5. Implications for research

BFRT’s mechanisms in adolescents are not yet fully understood, especially concerning its impact on hormonal responses and muscle growth. This study aims to advance the theoretical understanding of BFRT in adolescent populations, setting the stage for future studies that examine BFRT-specific adaptations in this age group, with special attention to safety and long-term developmental outcomes.

Extensive research has confirmed the adaptive effect of BFRT on muscle hypertrophy and strength growth across various populations. The primary physiological mechanisms underlying BFRT are driven by metabolic stress and mechanical tension, which promote the secretion of anabolic hormones such as GH, IGF-1, and MSTN levels, thereby facilitating muscle growth.

Using BFRT at low load intensities (20%–40% of 1RM) has demonstrated a low risk of injury, making it particularly suitable for adolescents. By applying individualized pressures based on AOP, BFRT ensures safety while effectively maintaining or improving muscle size, strength, and endurance. The lower load requirements reduce delayed-onset muscle soreness and help adolescents maintain a sustainable exercise routine. This study provides a theoretical basis for BFRT and lays a foundation for further scientific, targeted guidance in youth strength training.

Future research should focus on optimizing BFRT protocols specific to adolescent physiology, including ideal AOP percentages, load intensities, and training frequencies for different growth stages. Additionally, long-term studies are needed to assess the impact of BFRT on adolescent musculoskeletal development and overall health outcomes.

6. Conclusion

In conclusion, BFRT offers significant potential in enhancing physical health, preventing sports injuries, and improving athletic performance in adolescents. Nevertheless, given the ongoing maturation and ossification of epiphyseal cartilage during this developmental stage, high-intensity strength training may increase the risk of musculoskeletal injuries and could negatively impact development. In contrast, BFRT provides an effective, low-risk alternative, allowing adolescents to achieve similar muscle adaptations to high-intensity training with reduced mechanical strain.

As an ongoing developing training method that enriches physical education and sports training practices, BFRT supports the development of basic physical fitness and sports-specific performance. With appropriate AOP-based pressure settings, BFRT can be a valuable tool for promoting adolescent health and physical fitness. Therefore, BFRT is recommended as an innovative approach for schools, parents, and sports organizations to incorporate into youth fitness programs to foster safe and effective physical development in adolescents.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Humanities and social science research Foundation of Ministry of Education of China for their support in publishing this article.

Author contributions

Conceptualization: Zhen-Lei Chen, Tian-Shu Zhao.

Data curation: Zhen-Lei Chen, Tian-Shu Zhao.

Formal analysis: Zhen-Lei Chen, Tian-Shu Zhao, You-Qing Shen, Li-Ping Huang.

Funding acquisition: Li-Ping Huang.

Investigation: You-Qing Shen.

Methodology: You-Qing Shen.

Resources: Si-Zhuo Zhang.

Software: Shuang-Feng Ren, Si-Zhuo Zhang.

Supervision: Shuang-Feng Ren, Si-Zhuo Zhang, Ji-Lai Xu.

Validation: Shuang-Feng Ren, Ji-Lai Xu.

Visualization: Zhen-Lei Chen, Tian-Shu Zhao, Ji-Lai Xu.

Writing – original draft: Zhen-Lei Chen, Tian-Shu Zhao, Li-Ping Huang.

Writing – review & editing: Zhen-Lei Chen, Tian-Shu Zhao, Li-Ping Huang.

Abbreviations:

1RM
1-repetition maximum
ACSM
American College of Sports Medicine
AOP
arterial occlusion pressure
BFRT
blood flow restriction training
GH
growth hormone
IGF-1
insulin-like growth factor 1
MSTN
myostatin
mTOR
mechanistic target of rapamycin
WHO
World Health Organization

The statements and opinions expressed in Medicine® are those of the individual contributors, editors, or advertisers, as indicated, and do not necessarily represent the views of the other editors or the publisher. Unless otherwise specified, the authors and publisher disclaim any responsibility or liability for such material.

The Project Supported by Humanities and social science research Foundation of Ministry of Education of China (18YJC890032), and the Program of China Scholarship Council (Grant No. 202408420281).

This article is a narrative review based solely on previously published literature. It does not involve any studies with human participants or animals conducted by the authors. Therefore, ethical approval and informed consent were not required.

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

How to cite this article: Chen Z-L, Zhao T-S, Ren S-F, Zhang S-Z, Xu J-L, Shen Y-Q, Huang L-P. Application of blood flow restriction training in adolescents: A narrative review. Medicine 2025;104:29(e43084).

ZLC and TSZ contributed to this article equally.

Contributor Information

Tian-Shu Zhao, Email: zhaoshu1012@163.com.

Shuang-Feng Ren, Email: rehabrsf@163.com.

Si-Zhuo Zhang, Email: zhangsizhuo@foxmail.com.

Ji-Lai Xu, Email: j.xu.xh@juntendo.ac.jp.

You-Qing Shen, Email: future0104@126.com.

Li-Ping Huang, Email: ping-online@163.com.

References

  • [1].Qin F, Song Y, Nassis GP, et al. Physical activity, screen time, and emotional well-being during the 2019 novel coronavirus outbreak in China. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17:5170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [2].Kozlenia D, Domaradzki J. Effects of combination movement patterns quality and physical performance on injuries in young athletes. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18:8872. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [3].Prue J, Roman DP, Giampetruzzi NG, et al. Side effects and patient tolerance with the use of blood flow restriction training after ACL reconstruction in adolescents: a pilot study. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2022;17:347–54. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [4].Butt J, Ahmed Z. Blood flow restriction training and its use in rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Med. 2024;13:6265. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [5].Wei J, Li B, Yang W, et al. The effects and mechanisms of blood flow restriction training. China Sport Sci. 2019;39:71–80. [Google Scholar]
  • [6].May AK, Russell AP, Della Gatta PA, Warmington SA. Muscle adaptations to heavy-load and blood flow restriction resistance training methods. Front Physiol. 2022;13:837697. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [7].Wang A, Song J, Chang B. Experimental study on the effect of muscle blood flow restriction training on antioxidant capacity of speed skaters. J Guangzhou Inst Phys Educ. 2007;27:86–8. [Google Scholar]
  • [8].Wang M, Li Z, Wei W, Zhao Z, Chen C, Huang J. Empirical study on the effect of lower limb compression strength training for high-level male handball players. Chin Sports Sci Technol. 2019;55:30–6. [Google Scholar]
  • [9].Schiaffino S, Dyar KA, Ciciliot S, Blaauw B, Sandri M. Mechanisms regulating skeletal muscle growth and atrophy. FEBS J. 2013;280:4294–314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [10].Schoenfeld BJ. Potential mechanisms for a role of metabolic stress in hypertrophic adaptations to resistance training. Sports Med. 2013;43:179–94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [11].Pearson SJ, Hussain SR. A review on the mechanisms of blood-flow restriction resistance training-induced muscle hypertrophy. Sports Med. 2015;45:187–200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [12].Reeves GV, Kraemer RR, Hollander DB, et al. Comparison of hormone responses following light resistance exercise with partial vascular occlusion and moderately difficult resistance exercise without occlusion. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2006;101:1616–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [13].Velloso CP. Regulation of muscle mass by growth hormone and IGF-I. Br J Pharmacol. 2008;154:557–68. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [14].Tian Z, Hailing S, Mei Z, Bo B, Bing S. Research progress on the correlation between growth hormone/insulin-like growth factor-1 and malnutrition in children. Chin J Child Health. 2021;29:734–7. [Google Scholar]
  • [15].Goto K, Ishii N, Kizuka T, Takamatsu K. The impact of metabolic stress on hormonal responses and muscular adaptations. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005;37:955–63. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [16].Fabero-Garrido R, Gragera-Vela M, Del Corral T, Hernandez-Martin M, Plaza-Manzano G, Lopez-de-Uralde-Villanueva I. Effects of low-load blood flow restriction training on muscle anabolism biomarkers and thrombotic biomarkers compared with traditional training in healthy adults older than 60 years: systematic review and meta-analysis. Life (Basel). 2024;14:411. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [17].Fujita S, Abe T, Drummond MJ, et al. Blood flow restriction during low-intensity resistance exercise increases S6K1 phosphorylation and muscle protein synthesis. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2007;103:903–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [18].Laurentino GC, Ugrinowitsch C, Roschel H, et al. Strength training with blood flow restriction diminishes myostatin gene expression. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012;44:406–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [19].Fry CS, Glynn EL, Drummond MJ, et al. Blood flow restriction exercise stimulates mTORC1 signaling and muscle protein synthesis in older men. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2010;108:1199–209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [20].Kawada S, Ishii N. Skeletal muscle hypertrophy after chronic restriction of venous blood flow in rats. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005;37:1144–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [21].Sidhu SK, Weavil JC, Thurston TS, et al. Fatigue-related group III/IV muscle afferent feedback facilitates intracortical inhibition during locomotor exercise. J Physiol. 2018;596:4789–801. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [22].Emmet D, Roberts J, Yao KV. Update on preventing overuse injuries in youth athletes. Curr Phys Med Rehabil Rep. 2022;10:248–56. [Google Scholar]
  • [23].Nancekievill D, Seaman K, Bouchard DR, Thomson AM, Sénéchal M. Impact of exercise with blood flow restriction on muscle hypertrophy and performance outcomes in men and women. PLoS One. 2025;20:e0301164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [24].Loenneke JP, Fahs CA, Rossow LM, Abe T, Bemben MG. The anabolic benefits of venous blood flow restriction training may be induced by muscle cell swelling. Med Hypotheses. 2012;78:151–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [25].World Health Organization. Orientation Programme on Adolescent Health for Health Care Providers. World Health Organization; 2006. [Google Scholar]
  • [26].Niu Y, Qiao YC, Fan YZ. Effects of compression training on muscle morphology and function in subjects: a meta-analysis. J Capital Inst Phys Educ. 2020;32:25–34+86. [Google Scholar]
  • [27].Luebbers PE, Witte EV, Oshel JQ, Butler MS. Effects of practical blood flow restriction training on adolescent lower-body strength. J Strength Cond Res. 2019;33:2674–83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [28].Lu J, Liu S, Sun P, Li W, Lian Z. Effects of different pressure blood flow restriction combined with low-intensity resistance training on lower limb muscle and cardiopulmonary function in college students. Chin J Appl Physiol. 2020;36:595–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [29].Loenneke JP, Wilson JM, Marín PJ, Zourdos MC, Bemben MG. Low intensity blood flow restriction training: a meta-analysis. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2012;112:1849–59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [30].Kraemer WJ, Adams K, Cafarelli E, et al. ; American College of Sports Medicine. American College of Sports Medicine position stand. Progression models in resistance training for healthy adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2002;34:364–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [31].Fatela P, Reis JF, Mendonca GV, Avela J, Mil-Homens P. Acute effects of exercise under different levels of blood-flow restriction on muscle activation and fatigue. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2016;116:985–95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [32].Pignanelli C, Petrick HL, Keyvani F, et al. Low-load resistance training to task failure with and without blood flow restriction: muscular functional and structural adaptations. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2020;318:R284–95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [33].Lambert B, Hedt C, Daum J, et al. Blood flow restriction training for the shoulder: a case for proximal benefit. Am J Sports Med. 2021;49:2716–28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [34].Hosseini Kakhak SA, Kianigul M, Haghighi AH, Nooghabi MJ, Scott BR. Performing soccer-specific training with blood flow restriction enhances physical capacities in youth soccer players. J Strength Cond Res. 2020;36:1972–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [35].Yan Y, Guo L. A study on the effect of running with lower limb compression on the athletic performance of tennis players. J Southwest Normal Univ (Natl Sci Ed). 2018;43:167–75. [Google Scholar]
  • [36].Nie Y. Study on the effect of lower limb compression combined with running on tennis players’ training. Contemp Sports Technol. 2020;10:28–9. [Google Scholar]
  • [37].Lauver JD, Cayot TE, Rotarius T, Scheuermann BW. The effect of eccentric exercise with blood flow restriction on neuromuscular activation, microvascular oxygenation, and the repeated bout effect. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2017;117:1005–15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [38].Vieira A, Gadelha AB, Ferreira-Junior JB, et al. Session rating of perceived exertion following resistance exercise with blood flow restriction. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2015;35:323–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [39].Che T, Li Z, Zhao Z, Wei W, Sun K, Chen C. Effects of Low-intensity bench press combined with compression training on muscle activation and subjective fatigue. J Chengdu Univ Phys Educ. 2022;48:123–30. [Google Scholar]
  • [40].Che T, Yang T, Liang Y, Li Z. Effects of lower extremity low-intensity compression half squat training on muscle activation and subjective fatigue of core muscle groups. Sports Sci. 2021;41:59–66,78. [Google Scholar]
  • [41].Bowman EN, Elshaar R, Milligan H, et al. Proximal, distal, and contralateral effects of blood flow restriction training on the lower extremities: a randomized controlled trial. Sports Health. 2019;11:149–56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [42].Sun K, Wei W, Zhao Z. Differences of muscle activity between blood flow-restricted and unrestricted areas during low-intensity compression training of the lower extremity. China Sports Sci Technol. 2019;55:14–9. [Google Scholar]
  • [43].Ivany E, Lane DA, Dan GA, et al. Antithrombotic therapy for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation who survive an intracerebral haemorrhage: results of an EHRA survey. Europace. 2021;23:806–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [44].Yu L, Zhao Z, Wang Z, Gao J, Zhu X. Effects of short-term compression strength training on body composition and cardiovascular function in adult men. J Beijing Sport Univ. 2020;43:132–9. [Google Scholar]
  • [45].Li Z, Zhao Z, Wang M, Chen C, Wei W, Liang Y. Effects of 4-week compression training on body composition and maximum strength of male handball players. China Sports Sci Technol. 2019;55:37–43. [Google Scholar]
  • [46].Chen Y, Ma C, Wang J, Gu Y, Gao Y. Effects of 40% of maximum oxygen uptake intensity cycling combined with blood flow restriction training on body composition and serum biomarkers of Chinese college students with obesity. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;19:168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [47].Yasuda T, Fukumura K, Tomaru T, Nakajima T. Thigh muscle size and vascular function after blood flow-restricted elastic band training in older women. Oncotarget. 2016;7:33595–607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [48].Yasuda T, Fukumura K, Fukuda T, et al. Muscle size and arterial stiffness after blood flow-restricted low-intensity resistance training in older adults. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2014;24:799–806. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [49].Yasuda T, Fukumura K, Uchida Y, et al. Effects of low-load, elastic band resistance training combined with blood flow restriction on muscle size and arterial stiffness in older adults. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2015;70:950–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [50].Manimmanakorn A, Hamlin MJ, Ross JJ, Taylor R, Manimmanakorn N. Effects of low-load resistance training combined with blood flow restriction or hypoxia on muscle function and performance in netball athletes. J Sci Med Sport. 2013;16:337–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [51].Hughes L, Paton B, Rosenblatt B, Gissane C, Patterson SD. Blood flow restriction training in clinical musculoskeletal rehabilitation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med. 2017;51:1003–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [52].Kacin A, Drobnic M, Mars T, et al. Functional and molecular adaptations of quadriceps and hamstring muscles to blood flow restricted training in patients with ACL rupture. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2021;31:1636–46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [53].Killinger B, Lauver JD, Donovan L, Goetschius J. The effects of blood flow restriction on muscle activation and hypoxia in individuals with chronic ankle instability. J Sport Rehabil. 2020;29:633–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [54].Anderson AB, Owens JG, Patterson SD, Dickens JF, LeClere LE. Blood flow restriction therapy: from development to applications. Sports Med Arthrosc. 2019;27:119–23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Medicine are provided here courtesy of Wolters Kluwer Health

RESOURCES