Abstract
Dissimilatory nitrate reduction to ammonium (DNRA) is a key process used by diverse microorganisms in the global nitrogen cycle. For long, DNRA has been considered primarily as an organotrophic reaction, despite evidence that oxidation of inorganic electron donors also supports DNRA. Evidence of DNRA coupling with molecular hydrogen (H2) oxidation has been reported for several microbial isolates; however, the underlying physiology of the microbial process remains understudied. In this study, we report the isolation of two Campylobacterota strains, Aliarcobacter butzleri hDNRA1 and Sulfurospirillum sp. hDNRA2, which grow using H2 as the sole electron donor for DNRA, and physiological insights gained from a close examination of hydrogenotrophic DNRA in these isolates. In both batch and continuous cultures, DNRA sensu stricto (i.e. NO3− reduction that includes stoichiometric NO2−-to-NH4+ reduction) was strictly dependent on the presence of H2 and exhibited stoichiometric coupling with H2 oxidation, indicating that electrons required for NO2− reduction were unequivocally derived from H2. Successful chemostat incubation further demonstrated that hydrogenotrophic DNRA is viable under NO3−-limiting, H2-excess conditions. Genomic and transcriptomic analyses identified group 1b [NiFe]-hydrogenase and cytochrome c552 nitrite reductase as the key enzymes catalyzing hydrogenotrophic DNRA. In addition, metagenomic surveys revealed that bacteria capable of hydrogenotrophic DNRA are taxonomically diverse and abundant in various ecosystems, particularly in the vicinity of deep-sea hydrothermal vents. These findings, integrating physiological, genomic, and transcriptomic analyses, clarify that H2 can solely serve as a growth-supporting electron donor for DNRA and suggest potential significance of this microbial process in nitrogen- and hydrogen-related environmental biogeochemical cycles.
Keywords: nitrogen cycling, dissimilatory nitrate reduction to ammonium (DNRA), respiratory hydrogen oxidation, hydrogenases, Campylobacterota
Introduction
Nitrogen is an essential element for the sustenance and growth of all life forms [1]. Although indispensable as a nutrient, the excessive release of anthropogenic reactive nitrogen into the environment poses significant threats to global sustainability by exacerbating nutrient pollution and climate change [2–4]. The transformation of one nitrogen form to another, largely mediated by microorganisms, dictates its availability to primary producers, both when nitrogen abundance is beneficial (e.g. agricultural soils) and detrimental (e.g. eutrophic water bodies) [5, 6]. Microbial nitrogen-cycling processes, including nitrification (aerobic NH4+ oxidation to NO3− via NO2−) and denitrification (anaerobic NO3− reduction to NO, N2O, and N2) have been widely studied in this context, and also due to their significant contributions to the emission of the potent greenhouse gas N2O [7–9].
Another biological nitrogen-cycling process, dissimilatory nitrate reduction to ammonium (DNRA), despite also having been studied for decades, continues to offer discoveries that refine our understanding of the biogeochemical nitrogen cycle. Like denitrification, DNRA is an anaerobic respiratory pathway that reduces NO3− via NO2− for energy conservation [10]. What distinguishes DNRA from denitrification is the reaction step that reduces NO2− to NH4+, typically catalyzed by cytochrome c552 nitrite reductases (NrfA) [11, 12]. The competition between DNRA and denitrification for NO3−/NO2− has ecological significance, as DNRA retains nitrogen, thereby preventing or alleviating nitrogen loss via denitrification [5, 11]. Previous studies have mainly explained this competition through the C:N ratio (i.e. the ratio of organic electron donors to nitrogenous electron acceptors), assuming that DNRA is coupled to the oxidation of organic electron donors [13, 14]. For decades, DNRA has been hypothesized to be favored in environments with high C:N ratios due to its higher energy yield per electron acceptor, as supported by numerous field and laboratory observations [13–17].
Despite the limited physiological data available in the literature, DNRA has also been reported to couple with the oxidation of inorganic electron donors. Reduced sulfur compounds, namely, S0 and H2S/HS−/S2−, have been proposed as electron donors for chemolithotrophic DNRA, explaining the elevated DNRA activity and/or nrfA detection in sulfur-rich, highly reduced environments [18–21]. The coupling of DNRA with Fe2+ oxidation has also been suggested based on observations from cable bacteria and anammox [22, 23]. Chemolithotrophic DNRA has been observed in several axenic cultures, such as Desulfurivibrio alkaliphilus, using sulfide as an electron donor; however, current understanding remains limited, and definitive conclusions about its ecological implications are elusive [24, 25]. Particularly puzzling is the paucity of physiological investigations into DNRA coupled with H2 oxidation, despite the fact that this reaction is highly exergonic (Equations 1 and 2), H2 is a ubiquitous electron donor, and respiratory hydrogenases are widely distributed across diverse ecosystems [26–28].
![]() |
(1) |
![]() |
(2) |
Although a number of studies have provided evidence of NO3− reduction to NH4+ in the presence of H2 in bacterial isolates, evidence of exclusive dependence on H2 as the growth-supporting electron donor has been lacking. Most, if not all, of these experiments included large amounts of organic growth supplements that could serve as primary or supplementary electron donors [29–32]. Mass balance calculations were omitted, possibly due to interference from these electron-rich additives. Furthermore, most deep-sea isolates reported to exhibit DNRA phenotype in H2 presence lacked identified ammonium-forming nitrite reductase [33]. Here, we report two newly isolated Campylobacterota strains capable of growth on hydrogenotrophic DNRA. By integrating physiological, genomic, and transcriptomic analyses, we confirmed that DNRA in these isolates is tightly redox-coupled to H2 oxidation and suggest the key genes involved in this process. Furthermore, data mining of the metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs) within the Genome Taxonomy Database (GTDB) revealed that the genomic potential for hydrogenotrophic DNRA is widespread among microorganisms affiliated with the phylum Campylobacterota found across diverse environments, and that Sulfurospirillum spp., which exhibit high genomic similarity to one of these isolates, are particularly abundant in the vicinity of deep-sea hydrothermal vents.
Materials and methods
Culture medium and growth conditions
The defined medium used for enrichment, isolation, and routine cultivation contained, per liter of deionized water: 4.76 mmol NaCl, 0.47 mmol CaCl2·2H2O, 0.24 mmol MgCl2·6H2O, 0.2 mmol NH4Cl, and 1 ml trace mineral solution (Supplementary Table S1). For batch incubations, 100 ml medium was prepared in 590-ml glass bottles sealed with bromobutyl-rubber stoppers. After autoclaving, the medium was supplemented with filter-sterilized 5 mM piperazine-N,N′-bis(2-ethanesulfonic acid) (PIPES; pH 7.0), Wolin’s vitamin solution, and 0.15 mM KH2PO4. The bottles were equilibrated with a H2/CO2/N2 (5:5:90) mixed gas (World-Enersys, Daejeon, South Korea), unless otherwise specified. Sodium acetate and KNO3 were added from autoclaved stock solutions. All cultures were incubated in the dark at 25°C with shaking at 200 rpm. Agar plates were prepared by adding 1.5% (w/v) Bacto agar (BD, Franklin Lakes, NJ). Inoculated agar plates (and open aqueous cultures) were incubated in an anaerobic chamber (Coy Laboratory Products, Grass Lake, MI) with H2/CO2/N2 (4:5:91) atmosphere.
Isolation, screening, and cultivation
Activated sludge was sampled from the anoxic segment of a municipal wastewater treatment plant in Daejeon, South Korea (36°23′09.4"N, 127°24′28.5"E) on 26 October 2020. The initial goal was to isolate DNRA-catalyzing microorganisms that use acetate as their sole electron donor. In the anaerobic chamber, 20 ml of activated sludge was diluted into 200 ml medium containing 10 mM acetate and 2 mM NO3− in a loosely capped 590-ml glass bottle. Cycloheximide was added to a concentration of 0.01% (w/v) to inhibit fungal growth, and the culture was stirred at 500 rpm in the dark. Every two weeks, 20 ml of the enrichment was transferred to fresh medium. After three transfers, the enrichment was serially diluted and spread onto agar plates containing 20 mM acetate and 10 mM NO3−. Single colonies were screened for the DNRA phenotype [16].
Discovery, verification, and physiological characterization of hydrogenotrophic DNRA
A 200-μl suspension from a single colony was inoculated into 100 ml medium containing 10 mM acetate and 2 mM NO3− and equilibrated with N2. After initial attempts to reproduce DNRA activity failed, H2 was tested as a potential electron donor. Batch cultures were prepared with the following conditions: (i) H2/CO2/N2 (5:5:90) with 10 mM acetate, (ii) H2/N2 (5:95) with 10 mM acetate, (iii) H2/CO2/N2 (5:5:90) without organic carbon, and (iv) H2-free control (CO2/N2 5:95) with 10 mM acetate. All cultures contained 2 mM NO3−. Headspace H2 and N2O, dissolved NO3−, NO2−, NH4+, and acetate concentrations, and cell density (OD600) were monitored, and pH was measured before and after incubation. The two isolates that exhibited growth and consumed H2 and NO3−, producing NH4+, were taxonomically identified using Sanger sequencing of 16S rRNA genes amplified with the 27F/1492R primer set.
Coupling of DNRA with H2 oxidation of the two isolates, now termed Aliarcobacter butzleri hDNRA1 and Sulfurospirillum sp. hDNRA2, was further examined using intermittent H2 starvation experiments. Cultures were prepared with 2 mM NO3− and a CO2/N2 (5:95) headspace. Initial acetate concentrations were 1 mM for A. butzleri hDNRA1 and 0.1 mM for Sulfurospirillum sp. hDNRA2. A limiting amount of H2 (200 μmol per bottle) was injected at the start, and NO3−, NO2−, NH4+, and headspace H2 concentrations were monitored. Additional H2 (200 μmol) was injected after verifying cessation of NO3−/NO2− reduction following H2 depletion.
Kinetics of anaerobic H2 oxidation
Whole-cell Michaelis–Menten kinetics were measured to examine H2 affinities of the two isolates. Cultures were grown in medium with 1 mM acetate and 2 mM NO3− and a H2/CO2/N2 (5:5:90) headspace. After NO3−/ NO2− depletion, bottles underwent three vacuum-pressurization cycles with N2 gas, followed by the addition of 10 mM NO2− and H2 (100–100 000 ppmv) generated with a PG-H2 Plus Hydrogen Generator (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA). Initial H2 consumption rates were calculated from headspace concentrations measured with 20-minute intervals. Dry biomass was quantified from triplicate 100-ml cultures grown under identical conditions [34]. Vmax(app) and Km(app) values were calculated from the dataset obtained from triplicate experiments via nonlinear least-squares regression analysis using GraphPad Prism v9.5.1.
Continuous incubation on hydrogenotrophic DNRA
A chemostat reactor (1.14-l glass vessel, 600-ml working volume) was stirred at 650 rpm and operated at a dilution rate of 0.025 h−1 with medium containing 1 mM acetate and 2 mM NO3−, maintained anoxic with N2 flushing (Supplementary Fig. S1). Incubation began as a batch culture, continuously supplied with a stream of H2/CO2/N2 (0.5:0.5:99) mixed gas at 30 ml min−1, and the reactor was transitioned to chemostat operation after NO3−/NO2− depletion. NO3−, NO2−, and NH4+ concentrations and cell density were monitored. For Sulfurospirillum sp. hDNRA2, gas mixing ratios and flow rates were adjusted during incubation. Once nitrogen species concentrations stabilized, H2 was excluded from the gas stream to assess DNRA dependency on H2.
Analytical methods
H2 concentrations were measured using an 8890 gas chromatograph with a thermal conductivity detector and MolSieve 5 Å and Porapak Q columns (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA), using Ar (≥99.999%) as the carrier and reference gas. N2O concentrations were determined with another 8890 gas chromatograph equipped with a micro-electron capture detector and a HP-PLOT Q column, using He (≥99.999%) as the carrier gas and CH4/Ar (5:95) as the make-up gas. Dissolved H2 and N2O concentrations were calculated from headspace concentrations using dimensionless Henry’s constants (aqueous/gaseous; 25°C) of 0.0193 and 0.595, respectively [35]. NO3−, NO2−, and NH4+ concentrations were measured colorimetrically, and acetate concentration were analyzed using a Prominence HPLC system (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) [36, 37].
Genome sequencing
Genomic DNA was extracted from batch cultures using the DNeasy Blood & Tissue kit (Qiagen, Germany). A hybrid genome sequencing approach was employed, combining HiSeq (Illumina, San Diego, CA) and MinION (Oxford Nanopore Technologies, Oxford, UK) sequencing. A paired-end sequencing library, prepared using the TruSeq DNA PCR-Free kit (Illumina), was sequenced at Macrogen (Seoul, South Korea) with a 4-Gb throughput. Raw reads were trimmed using Trimmomatic v0.39 and assembled using SPAdes v3.15.3 [38, 39]. Long-read sequencing was performed on a MinION sequencer using a R9.4.1 flow cell with libraries prepared using the Ligation Sequencing kit (Oxford Nanopore Technologies). Raw sequences were processed with Guppy v6.2.11 (Oxford Nanopore Technologies) and Porechop v0.2.4 [40]. A short-read-first hybrid assembly was constructed using Unicycler v0.4.8 and annotated using Prokka v1.14.5 [41, 42].
Transcriptome sequencing
Triplicate cultures were grown in a 5-l glass bottle containing 1 l medium supplemented with 1 mM acetate and 2 mM NO3− and a H2/CO2/N2 (5:5:90) headspace. Cultures of A. butzleri hDNRA1 grown without H2 and Sulfurillosprillum sp. hDNRA2 grown without H2 (5:95 CO2/N2 gas in the headspace) but with 5 mM formate were also prepared. Cell density and NO3−/NO2− concentrations were monitored to ensure that the samples were collected during the exponential phase (Supplementary Fig. S2). The entire batch was filtered through a 0.22-μm Sterivex filter unit (Merck Millipore, Germany). Subsequently, 10 ml RNAprotect bacteria reagent (Qiagen) was passed through the filter, which was then stored at −80°C. After thawing on ice, the membrane filter was disrupted using acid-washed glass beads. The crude lysate was processed with RNeasy Mini kit, RNase-Free DNase, and RNeasy MinElute Cleanup kit (Qiagen). Following treatment with the Ribo-Zero Plus rRNA Depletion kit, the RNA-Seq library was prepared using the Stranded Total RNA Prep kit (Illumina). Paired-end sequencing was performed on a NovaSeq 6000 platform (Illumina) at Macrogen with a 5-Gb throughput. The biological triplicates were processed and sequenced independently.
Transcriptome analyses
Raw reads were quality-trimmed using Trimmomatic v0.36 and mapped to the genomes using Bowtie2 v2.5.1 [43]. The alignments were converted to binary alignment map (BAM) format and sorted using SAMtools v1.17 [44]. Read counts were computed using featureCounts v2.0.6 [45]. Equation 3 was used to calculate fragments per kilobase of transcript per million reads mapped (FPKM) values.
![]() |
(3) |
where Ci is the number of fragments mapped to the gene of interest, N is the total number of mapped fragments, and Li is the gene length (bases). The transcription data were analyzed using the “DESeq2” package v1.42.0, with the biological triplicate dataset as input [46]. Genes with |log2(fold change)| > 1 and an adjusted P value < .05 (Benjamini–Hochberg method) from pairwise comparisons between two incubation conditions were considered differentially expressed.
Analyses of metagenome-assembled genomes from GTDB
GTDB R09-RS220A was searched for MAGs affiliated with the Campylobacterota phylum, using selection criteria of ≥ 90% completeness and ≤ 5% contamination [47]. Protein-coding genes were predicted using Prodigal v2.6.3 [48]. The hidden Markov models (HMMs) for NapA (KEGG Orthology ID: K02567) and NrfA (K03385) were downloaded from KofamKOALA [49]. The HMM for HynB, the large catalytic subunit of the group 1b [NiFe]-hydrogenase, was constructed from a MAFFT (v7.526) alignment of 52 Epsilonproteobacteria HynB sequences downloaded from HydDB (updated 2 September 2018), using hmmbuild command in HMMER v3.4 [50–52]. The MAGs were screened for the presence of all three target genes using hmmsearch, applying an E-value threshold of 1e-20 for NrfA and NapA, and 1e-150 for HynB. The HMMER-screened MAGs were annotated with Prokka v1.14.6 [42].
For MAGs with traceable source metagenomic data, relative abundances were computed by mapping the raw metagenomic reads onto the contigs constituting the MAGs. The raw metagenomic data were downloaded from the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (accessed 14 October 2024; Supplementary Table S2). Initial quality assessment was conducted using FastQC v0.12.1 [53]. The reads processed with Trimmomatic v0.39 were mapped to the indexed MAGs, using the bwa mem command in BWA v0.7.17 [38, 54]. The mapped reads were processed with SAMtools v1.17 [44]. The percentage of metagenomic reads mapped to a MAG represented the relative abundance of the corresponding microorganism.
Statistical analysis
All statistical analyses were performed using R v4.3.1 (www.r-project.org). Statistical significance was determined using Student’s t-tests: paired t-test for comparison between two time points within a time-series dataset, and unpaired t-tests for comparison across two different treatments.
Results
New Campylobacterota isolates mediate hydrogenotrophic DNRA
We isolated two bacteria capable of coupling NO3−/NO2−-to-NH4+ reduction with H2 oxidation. Genomic analyses revealed their phylogenetic affiliation with the genera Aliarcobacter and Sulfurospirillum, both belonging to the phylum Campylobacterota (Fig. 1A). Their closest type strains were A. butzleri RM4018 (99.9% 16S rRNA gene sequence identity; digital DNA–DNA hybridization score of 76.1% using the formula d4) and Sulfurospirillum cavolei NBRC 109482 (99.5% and 67.0%, respectively). Thus, the two new isolates are designated as A. butzleri hDNRA1 and Sulfurospirillum sp. hDNRA2. Both isolates exhibited a curved rod-shaped morphology with approximate dimensions of 1.5–2.5 μm × 0.3–0.4 μm (Fig. 1B). Only A. butzleri hDNRA1 possessed a polar flagellum-like appendage.
Figure 1.
Phylogenetic affiliation, cellular morphology, and growth characteristics of A. butzleri hDNRA1 and Sulfurospirillum sp. hDNRA2 during hydrogenotrophic DNRA. (A) Maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree of 92 Campylobacterota genomes, including the two isolates, constructed using IQ-TREE v2.3.6. The tree is based on the alignment of the concatenated amino acid sequences from 120 single-copy bacterial marker genes identified with GTDB-Tk v2.4.0 (release220). Three Nitrosomonas spp. genomes served as the outgroup. Branch support values were derived from 1000 ultrafast bootstrap replicates and the SH-aLRT single-branch test; bifurcations with both support values > 80% are marked with filled black circles. A grid plot to the right of the tree visualizes the inventories of functional genes encoding dissimilatory NO3−/NO2− reductases and hydrogenases. (B) SEM (top) and TEM (bottom) images of A. butzleri hDNRA1 (left) and Sulfurospirillum sp. hDNRA2 (right). Scale bars in the micrographs represent 1 μm and 0.2 μm for SEM and TEM images, respectively. (C) Batch-culture growth curves of A. butzleri hDNRA1 and Sulfurospirillum sp. hDNRA2, grown with H2, acetate, and NO3−. Each data point represents the mean of three biological replicates (n = 3), with error bars indicating standard deviations.
A series of batch experiments confirmed that H2 can serve as the sole electron donor for DNRA sensu stricto (i.e. NO3− reduction that includes stoichiometric NH4+ production from NO2−) in these isolates. Despite the presence of acetate in the medium, which A. butzleri hDNRA1 could utilize as the electron donor for NO3−-to-NO2− reduction, NO2−-to-NH4+ reduction required H2 (Figs 1C and 2A–C). In the cultures amended with H2 and acetate, A. butzleri hDNRA1 completely consumed 201 ± 1 μmol NO3−, of which 181 ± 2 μmol was converted to NH4+, exhibiting a diauxic growth. Oxidation of 670 ± 30 μmol H2, yielding 1340 ± 60 μmol e−, accounted for 84 ± 4% of the theoretical electron demand. Sulfurospirillum sp. hDNRA2 was unable to couple NO3− reduction with acetate oxidation; therefore, H2 served as the sole electron donor (Fig. 2E). The electron yield from H2 oxidation (1910 ± 20 μmol e−) greatly exceeded the theoretical electron demand (1330 ± 10 μmol e−), suggesting that Sulfurospirillum sp. hDNRA2 allocated ~ 30% of the electrons from H2 oxidation for assimilation (Fig. 2F and G). Under identical NO3−-reducing conditions, Sulfurospirillum sp. hDNRA2 achieved significantly higher biomass (OD600 value of 0.064 ± 0.001 compared to 0.032 ± 0.002 of A. butzleri hDNRA1; P value < .05) (Fig. 1C).
Figure 2.
Hydrogenotrophic DNRA and H2 oxidation kinetics in A. butzleri hDNRA1 and Sulfurospirillum sp. hDNRA2. (A, B, E, F) Reductive transformation of NO3− (2 mM; 200 μmol per bottle) was monitored in batch cultures under two conditions: in the absence (A, E) and presence (B, F) of 5% (v/v) H2 in the headspace. Concentrations of NO3−, NO2−, NH4+, and acetate were monitored, with dotted vertical lines indicating the NO2− peak (t=10 h) and the depletion of NO3−/NO2− (t=16 h). (C, G) H2 consumption during the experiments (B, F) was tracked over time to assess its role as an electron donor for DNRA. Each data point represents the mean of three biological replicates (n = 3), with error bars indicating standard deviations. (D, H) Michaelis–Menten kinetics of H2 oxidation were evaluated for whole cells pregrown on hydrogenotrophic DNRA. Initial H2 oxidation rates were calculated from batch incubations (n = 3) initiated with the indicated molar concentrations of dissolved H2 on the x-axis.
Transient accumulation of NO2− and N2O was observed in both isolates but was substantially higher in A. butzleri hDNRA1 cultures. Neither isolate exhibited significant growth on H2 without acetate, as evidenced by the lack of a significant change in OD600 value during incubation (P value > .05); however, Sulfurospirillum sp. hDNRA2 exhibited significant NH4+ production (P value < .05), which was sustained for > 72 h (Supplementary Fig. S3). Aliarcobacter butzleri hDNRA1 reduced NO3− to NO2− but not to NH4+.
H2 oxidation is directly coupled to DNRA
The redox-coupling of DNRA sensu stricto to H2 oxidation was further verified through batch incubations with intermittent H2 starvation periods. Aliarcobacter butzleri hDNRA1 completely reduced 204 ± 4 μmol NO3− prior to the first H2 starvation period, presumably utilizing both acetate and H2 as electron donors (Fig. 3A). The NO2−-to-NH4+ turnover halted immediately following H2 depletion. H2 injection at t = 34 and 59 h immediately resumed NO2−-to-NH4+ reduction. Acetate was consumed only when H2 was being consumed; however, a portion of electron from acetate may have been directed to NO2− after repeated H2 starvations, as inferred from the observed discrepancy between the amounts of H2 oxidized (185 ± 6 μmol; 369 ± 13 μmol e−) and the NO2− reduced to NH4+ (96 ± 6 μmol; 578 ± 37 μmol e−) beyond t = 59 h.
Figure 3.
Coupling of H2 oxidation with DNRA in H2-limited batch cultures and chemostat reactor of A. butzleri hDNRA1 and Sulfurospirillum sp. hDNRA2. (A, B) Hydrogen-limited batch cultures were initiated with a stoichiometrically limiting amount of H2 (200 μmol bottle−1; H2-to-NO3− molar ratio of 1) and replenished with H2 (200 μmol bottle−1) after its depletion (indicated by black arrows). The concentrations of NO3−, NO2−, NH4+, H2, and acetate were monitored until the complete depletion of NO3−/NO2− and are presented as total amounts in the bottles. Each data point represents the mean of three biological replicates (n = 3), with error bars indicating standard deviations. (C, D) Hydrogenotrophic DNRA was demonstrated in lab-scale chemostat reactors. For Sulfurospirillum sp. hDNRA2, experimental conditions were optimized during incubation to achieve a steady state, with vertical dotted lines marking the time points of changes (details provided below the figure). At the end of the incubation, H2 was removed from the gas stream to evaluate its impact on DNRA activity.
The experiment with Sulfurospirillum sp. hDNRA2, performed under identical conditions but with a reduced initial amount of acetate (10 μmol bottle−1), not only confirmed that H2 served as the sole electron donor for both NO3−-to-NO2− and NO2−-to-NH4+ reduction but also demonstrated that these reductions could be sustained without organic carbon source for an extended period (Fig. 3C). Both reduction processes occurred simultaneously. The ratio of electron distribution to NO3− and NO2− from the initially added H2 was 0.70; however, this ratio decreased to 0.44 for H2 added at t = 30 h and further decreased to 0.28 for H2 added at t = 53 h, indicating a shift in electron allocation between NO3− and NO2−. Even after acetate depletion at t = 9 h, DNRA activity was sustained for > 70 h, resulting in complete reduction of remaining NO3− and NO2− to NH4+.
The kinetics of H2 oxidation coupled to NO2−-to-NH4+ reduction by both isolates fit well to the Michaelis–Menten kinetics model (R2 > 0.97; Fig. 2D and H). The Km(app) values were calculated to be 10.8 μM (95% confidence interval: 9.0–12.9) and 15.0 μM (95% confidence interval: 11.5–19.5) for A. butzleri hDNRA1 and Sulfurospirillum sp. hDNRA2, respectively. The Vmax(app) values were 3.76 μmol min−1 (mg biomass)−1 (3.56–3.97) and 3.01 μmol min−1 (mg biomass)−1 (2.76–3.30), respectively. Therefore, the two isolates apparently share a comparable target H2 concentration range and maximum turnover rates.
Hydrogenotrophic DNRA is sustained during NO3−-limiting continuous cultivation
The feasibility of establishing a NO3−-limiting steady-state culture with the two isolates was examined (Fig. 3B and D). The A. butzleri hDNRA1 chemostat, supplied with a stream of H2/CO2/N2 (0.5:0.5:99) mixed gas, reached a steady-state after 526 h, with no detectable NO3− (<0.01 mM) and 2.0 ± 0.1 mM NH4+ in the steady-state culture. The steady-state NO3− consumption and NH4+ production rates were 30.5 ± 0.6 and 28.1 ± 0.4 μmol h−1, respectively. Acetate was consumed at a rate of 13.7 ± 0.7 μmol h−1. The H2 concentrations in the influent and effluent gas streams were indistinguishable (P value > .05), consistent with stoichiometric calculations indicating H2 was supplied in excess (4018 μmol h−1 in the flow-through gas, compared to the theoretical demand of 245 μmol h−1, assuming H2 serves as the sole electron donor for NO3−-to-NH4+ reduction). After ~200 h of steady-state reactor operation, the gas supply was switched to exclude H2, and the NO2− concentration in the reactor gradually increased. A new steady-state was established, at which the NO2− concentration matched the NO3− concentration in the influent, corroborating that DNRA sensu stricto was strictly coupled to H2 oxidation.
Establishing a continuous culture of Sulfurospirillum sp. hDNRA2 required additional optimization (Fig. 3D). The initial conditions failed to achieve the targeted steady state. Only after H2 and CO2 concentrations in the gas stream were increased to 1% and 5%, respectively, the reactor completely reduced 2 mM NO3− to NH4+ at a rate of 15.65 ± 0.24 μmol h−1. During this steady-state operation, acetate was consumed at 1.73 ± 0.35 μmol h−1. The removal of H2 resulted in washout, confirming that the reduction of both NO3− and NO2− in Sulfurospirillum sp. hDNRA2 was coupled to H2 oxidation.
Both strains encode hydrogenases and Nap and Nrf for hydrogenotrophic DNRA
Closed genomes of A. butzleri hDNRA1 and Sulfurospirillum sp. hDNRA2 were obtained through hybrid assembly of short-read and long-read data (Supplementary Table S3). Both strains possess a nap cluster (napAGHBFLD) and a nrf cluster (nrfAH), encoding a respiratory periplasmic nitrate reductase and a cytochrome c552 nitrite reductase, respectively (Fig. 4A and Supplementary Table S4). The nrf cluster is immediately downstream of the nap cluster in A. butzleri hDNRA1, and in proximity (~30 kb apart) in Sulfurospirillum sp. hDNRA2, corroborating their functional relatedness. Although neither genome contains nirK or nirS, confirming their inability to denitrify, both genomes harbor clade II nosZ genes encoding the catalytic subunit of nitrous oxide reductase.
Figure 4.
Genomic and transcriptomic insights into hydrogenotrophic DNRA in A. butzleri hDNRA1 and Sulfurospirillum sp. hDNRA2. (A, B) Gene clusters putatively associated with hydrogenotrophic DNRA identified from the complete genomes of A. butzleri hDNRA1 and Sulfurospirillum sp. hDNRA2. (C, D) Differential gene expression analyses of functional genes involved in hydrogen oxidation and nitrogen metabolism (top). Genome-wide transcriptional changes under H2-free (acetate and formate used as alternate electron donors for A. butzleri hDNRA1 and Sulfurospirillum sp. hDNRA2, respectively) versus H2-supplemented conditions are shown in volcano plots (bottom). Datasets from three biological replicates (n = 3) are presented for each condition. Maximum-likelihood phylogenetic trees generated with the amino acid sequences of the catalytic subunits of the group 1b [NiFe]- and group 2d [NiFe]-hydrogenases (E), and cytochrome c552 nitrite reductase (F) are presented to illustrate the phylogenetic positioning of these key functional genes in the two hydrogenotrophic DNRA isolates.
Structural and maturation genes for multiple hydrogenases were identified in the genomes. Both bacteria co-encode a group 1b [NiFe]-hydrogenase (hynAB) and a group 2d [NiFe]-hydrogenase (huaSL). In addition, in A. butzleri hDNRA1, another set of hynAB with 51.2% amino acid identity was identified nearby. Both isolates also possessed the hypABCDEF genes required for the maturation of [NiFe]-hydrogenases. Sulfurospirillum sp. hDNRA2 harbored groups 4a and 4c [NiFe]-hydrogenases that couple the oxidation of formate and carbon monoxide to H2 generation from protons, as well as a group A [FeFe]-hydrogenase flanked by H-cluster maturation assembly genes (hydGEF) and aspartate ammonia-lyase (aspA) (Supplementary Table S5). This hydrogenase inventory suggests that this strain can mediate a range of H2 oxidation and production, in addition to hydrogenotrophic DNRA. This strain also encodes formate dehydrogenase N (fdnG) and formate dehydrogenase H (fdhF), which may explain its ability to utilize formate as the source of electrons for NO3− respiration (Supplementary Fig. S4).
The capacity for mixotrophic growth, specifically biomass production through carbon acquisition from acetate and CO2, was evident from the Sulfurospirillum sp. hDNRA2 genome (Supplementary Fig. S5). Acetate assimilation likely depends on acetate kinase and phosphate acetyltransferase, encoded by the ackA and pta genes, respectively. Acetyl-CoA may also be generated by the activity of acetate-CoA ligase, encoded by the acs gene. The reductive tricarboxylic acid (rTCA) cycle is the most likely pathway employed by Sulfurospirillum sp. hDNRA2 if it assimilates CO2, as many of the genes encoding this pathway, including those for 2-oxoglutarate synthase, isocitrate dehydrogenase, pyruvate carboxylase, succinate-CoA ligase (ADP-forming), and pyruvate synthase are present in the genome. However, two key genes in the conventional rTCA cycle, encoding phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase and ATP citrate lyase, are missing. The involvement of the Wood–Ljungdahl pathway for CO2 fixation is unlikely, as no CO-methylating acetyl-CoA synthase was identified. Key rTCA cycle genes and CO-methylating acetyl-CoA synthase were not identified in A. butzleri hDNRA1, explaining its dependence on acetate for biomass carbon.
Transcriptomic underpinning of hydrogenotrophic DNRA
Transcriptome sequencing yielded 73.2 ± 15.5 million reads per sample. Differential gene expression analysis revealed a substantial difference between the transcriptomes of A. butzleri hDNRA1 cultures grown with H2 (coupled with NO3−-to-NH4+ reduction) and those grown without H2 (NO3−-to-NO2− reduction coupled with acetate oxidation) (Fig. 4B). Significant differences were observed for 1191 out of 2260 protein-coding genes, with 547 upregulated under the H2-oxidizing condition. The upregulation of the two sets of hynAB genes (3.7 ± 0.4/2.3 ± 0.4- and 6.2 ± 0.2/4.2 ± 0.2-fold; adjusted P value < .001) and the nrfA gene (4.0 ± 0.4-fold; adjusted P value < .001) suggested that the group 1b [NiFe]-hydrogenases and cytochrome c552 nitrite reductase catalyze H2 oxidation and NO2−-to-NH4+ reduction, respectively. The transcription of the napAGHBFLD cluster was constitutive and largely unaffected by H2 presence. The transcription of napA was at least 6.5-fold higher than those of the single-copy housekeeping genes dnaA, rho, and recA regardless of H2 presence, indicating that NO3−-to-NO2− reduction is mediated by NapA. The downregulation of the huaSL genes (adjusted P value < .001) in the presence of H2 suggests that group 2d [NiFe] hydrogenase is unlikely to participate in hydrogenotrophic DNRA.
For Sulfurospirillum sp. hDNRA2, transcriptome data obtained from H2- and formate-fed cultures were compared, as formate was the only other electron donor that supported its anaerobic growth on NO3− (Supplementary Fig. S4). Although the formate-amended cultures exhibited the phenotypes of DNRA sensu stricto, no significant difference was observed for hynAB transcription from the H2-grown cultures (adjusted P value > .05), suggesting that H2 produced from the formate hydrogen lyase complex could have been utilized as the electron donor for DNRA (Fig. 2D). Supporting this hypothesis, fdhF and hycE, encoding the catalytic subunits of formate dehydrogenase H and hydrogenase-3, respectively, were transcribed at a level comparable to those of the housekeeping gene dnaA (P value > .05), and up to 558 ± 108 μmol of H2 was detected during batch incubation with 5230 ± 90 μmol formate (Supplementary Fig. S2).
As formate condition was also considered as H2-dependent, transcriptome analysis focused on identifying genes that were highly expressed during hydrogenotrophic DNRA relative to single-copy housekeeping genes. Among the 2619 protein-coding genes, 426 (16.3%), including those encoding catalytic subunits of respiratory hydrogenases and DNRA-catalyzing enzymes, exhibited higher transcription levels than all scrutinized single-copy housekeeping genes (Supplementary Fig. S6). Both hynAB genes showed transcription levels at least 7.6-fold higher than that of dnaA. The napA and nrfA genes were among the top 4% of the most highly transcribed genes. One of the duplicate nosZ copies was also among the most highly expressed genes, explaining the transient N2O accumulation observed during hydrogenotrophic DNRA (Fig. 2F). In addition, genes encoding enzymes of the rTCA cycle, such as sucCD (succinate-CoA ligase), gltA (citrate synthase), korAB (2-oxoglutarate synthase), and porA (pyruvate synthase), all exhibited comparable or higher transcription levels than that of recA (Supplementary Fig. S7).
Metagenomic surveys suggest ecological significance of hydrogenotrophic DNRA
Analyses of 475 Campylobacterota MAGs identified 75 MAGs harboring at least one copy of each of the napA, nrfA, and hynB genes (Fig. 5A). These MAGs were distributed across the phylum, covering six different previously defined families and three undefined family-level taxa, suggesting that the hydrogenotrophic DNRA genotype may be widespread among microorganisms within the Campylobacterota phylum.
Figure 5.
Analyses of Campylobacterota MAGs from the GTDB, containing at least one copy of each of the napA, nrfA, and hynB genes. (A) Maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree of 74 Campylobacterota high-quality MAGs (CheckM completeness ≥ 90%, contamination ≤5%), constructed using IQ-TREE v2.3.6. Colored shades indicate family-level taxonomic affiliations, and colored dots next to the taxon descriptions represent the ecosystem classifications of their source metagenomes. (B) Geographical origins of the analyzed Campylobacterota MAGs, visualized on a world map. (C) Violin plots depicting the relative abundances (percentage of quality-trimmed raw reads from the source metagenome mapped onto each MAG) of Campylobacterota MAGs in their source metagenomes, categorized into three ecosystem types. Box plots within the violin plots display medians, interquartile ranges, and boundaries for non-outliers. (D, E) Maximum-likelihood phylogenetic trees constructed with in-silico-translated amino acid sequences of hydrogenotrophic DNRA marker genes nrfA (D) and hynB (E) identified from the Campylobacterota MAGs. Only non-truncated sequences are included. Heatmaps next to the trees indicate the amino acid identity between these sequences and those from A. butzleri hDNRA1 and Sulfurospirillum sp. hDNRA2.
The metagenomes from which these MAGs were derived include 142, 48, and 48 datasets from host-associated, environmental, and engineered ecosystems, respectively, categorized according to the JGI GOLD Ecosystem Classification criteria (accessed 8 November 2024; Fig. 5B and C; Supplementary Table S2). The putative hydrogenotrophic DNRA-catalyzing bacteria accounted for notable proportions of the microbial communities represented by these datasets, with 40 of 240 exhibiting >1% relative abundances. Several MAGs, found to be of substantial abundance in their respective metagenomes, were closely related to the two isolates examined in this study (Fig. 5D and E). For instance, a Halarcobacter MAG (GCA_002869565.1) harboring nrfA and hynB genes with >71% amino acid identity to those in A. butzleri hDNRA1 accounted for up to 4% of a laboratory enrichment of an estuary sediment. A Sulfurospirillum MAG (GCA_026988125.1), containing nrfA and hynB genes with >64% amino acid identity to those in Sulfurospirillum sp. hDNRA2, constituted 2% of the microbial population in a marine hydrothermal vent microbiome in the Mid-Atlantic Ridge.
A substantial proportion (41/75) of closely related MAGs affiliated with Campylobacteraceae and Helicobacteraceae originated from host-associated metagenomes. Nine of these MAGs, mostly recovered from mammalian digestive systems, had relative abundances of > 1%. The nrfA genes in these MAGs generally exhibited low similarity to those of the strains hDNRA1 and hDNRA2; however, they shared > 47% amino acid identity with the nrfA of a verified DNRA-catalyzing bacterium, Campylobacter jejuni NCTC11168 [55].
Discussion
Thermodynamically and biochemically, the redox coupling of H2 oxidation and DNRA is difficult to be overlooked, as it is sufficiently exergonic, and various configurations of electron transport chains can bridge the substantial redox potential difference (ΔE0′ = 0.76 V) between the half-reactions [10, 56]. Several studies demonstrated bacterial isolates, including Wolinella succinogenes, capable of nitrate ammonification when supplied with H2 along with organic growth supplements, such as yeast extract [30–33, 57]. Other studies reported genomes and MAGs possessing both hydrogenase genes (e.g. hynAB) and nrfA [58, 59]. A recent study on the newly isolated Trichlorobacter ammonificans, possessing an octaheme cytochrome c nitrite reductase, suggested that H2 may serve as a supplemental electron donor for NO2−-to-NH4+ reduction [60]. Distinct from these previous studies, the current work demonstrates a reaction stoichiometry indicative of tight redox coupling between H2 oxidation and DNRA supporting cellular growth without the need for growth supplements containing costly biomass-building compounds or supplemental organic electron donors. Furthermore, these physiological findings are supported by genomic and transcriptomic data implicating group 1b [NiFe]-hydrogenases and NrfA in this pathway.
In the axenic cultures of the two isolates, hydrogenotrophic DNRA occurred independent of the presence of an organic e− donor, seemingly challenging the widely accepted C:N ratio hypothesis on DNRA regulation [15, 19, 61]. Our findings suggest that hydrogenotrophic DNRA can be physiologically viable in environments with high H2 concentration but relatively low organic carbon availability, such as deep-sea hydrothermal vents [62]. Nevertheless, this does not necessarily invalidate the C:N ratio hypothesis, as potential H2 hotspots, often fueled by fermentative H2 production, overlap with environments characterized by high C:N ratios [63]. Furthermore, the C:N ratio hypothesis is theoretically based on the ecological competition between DNRA and denitrification to maximize energy acquisition from a limited resource, whether it is e− donor (low C:N) or e− acceptor (high C:N) [11, 13, 15]. Therefore, when an inorganic e− donor is involved, the C:N ratio hypothesis should be considered in the context of e− donor or e− acceptor limitation, rather than the relative availability of organic carbon and nitrogenous e− acceptors. How hydrogenotrophic DNRA and hydrogenotrophic denitrification compete for limiting H2 or NO3− is yet unknown. Nonetheless, our observations from H2 oxidation biokinetics experiments and the NO3−-limiting chemostats suggest that the hydrogenotrophic DNRA pathway is a viable competitor under ecologically relevant H2-rich, NO3−-depleted environments.
Acetate was consumed alongside H2 in both isolates undergoing hydrogenotrophic DNRA, although the redox coupling of DNRA sensu stricto with H2 oxidation was clearly verified. Neither microorganism is, in that sense, autotrophic, although further examination with 13C-labeled substrates is warranted to determine whether they are mixotrophic or heterotrophic. The biomass yields observed for the two isolates examined here, based on the increase in OD600 value per 1 mM NO3− reduced to NH4+, were approximately an order of magnitude lower than those observed in previously examined DNRA-catalyzing microorganisms belonging to the Pseudomonadota and Bacillota phyla, probably due to the energetic cost in incorporating acetate into biomass via acetyl-CoA synthesis [16, 17, 64]. However, as most, if not all, previous studies were performed with growth supplements, it would be premature to conclude that energy conservation in these hydrogenotrophic DNRA isolates is inherently less efficient than in organisms utilizing organoheterotrophic DNRA. Procurement of organic carbon sources by hydrogen-oxidizing bacteria has been previously observed [65, 66]. A previous study demonstrated, via quantitative stable isotope probing analysis, that addition of H2 increased the assimilation of 13C-acetate by certain bacterial taxa in microbiomes associated with deep-sea peridotite, which can serve as a source of H2 and acetate through serpentinization [67]. This H2 and acetate source may serve as the electron and carbon source, respectively, for nrfA-and-hynAB-possessing Sulfurospirillum spp. in the marine hydrothermal vent environments, where our metagenomic survey identified these organisms as abundant.
The two isolates, despite their genomic similarity (64.2% ANI) and sharing the same enzymes for H2 oxidation and DNRA, exhibited substantial physiological differences. They varied in their ability to use acetate as an electron donor for NO3−-to-NO2− reduction and in their capacity to perform hydrogenotrophic DNRA without acetate. The extent of NO2− accumulation during NO3−-to-NH4+ reduction also differed, suggesting that hydrogenotrophic DNRA in Sulfurillospirillum sp. hDNRA2 was not inhibited by NO3−, unlike A. butzleri hDNRA1 or previously studied organotrophic DNRA-catalyzing bacteria [16, 68]. These subtle but significant physiological differences cannot be predicted by genomic analysis alone, highlighting the importance of cultivation in advancing our understanding of biogeochemical processes and unlocking the biotechnological potential of microorganisms and microbiota in nature [69].
The metagenomic survey revealed that genomic features of hydrogenotrophic DNRA are widespread among microorganisms affiliated with Campylobacterota. Several Campylobacterota MAGs harboring napA, nrfA, and hynB, including several closely associated with Sulfurospirillum sp. hDNRA2, had been derived from metagenomes of deep-sea hydrothermal vent microbiomes, where they constituted a significant subpopulation [70, 71]. Both the nrfA and hynAB genes of the Sulfurospirillum MAGs exhibited high similarity to those of Sulfurospillum sp. hDNRA2, suggesting a comparable metabolic capability for hydrogenotrophic DNRA. Hydrothermal vents are well-known hotspots for H2-oxiding microorganisms utilizing H2 carried by hydrothermal fluids, and NO3− is readily available in seawater [72, 73]. That NH4+ is generated biologically from seawater NO3− in such environment was previously evidenced from isotopic analyses of NH4+ sampled from hydrothermal vents on the Juan de Fuca Ridge [74]. Furthermore, several thermophilic bacterial isolates from deep-sea hydrothermal vents have demonstrated the capability to couple H2 oxidation with nitrate ammonification, despite lacking known ammonia-forming nitrite reductases in their genomes [30, 33, 57]. Although the Km(app) value of Sulfurospirillum sp. hDNRA2 did not indicate a high affinity to H2, micromolar concentration of H2, sufficiently high to support its growth, is not anomalous in vicinity of hydrothermal vents [67, 75]. Thus, hydrogenotrophic DNRA by Sulfurospirillum spp. may be among contributors to NH4+ generation in the hydrothermal vent environments.
The MAGs closely affiliated with Sulfurospirillum sp. hDNRA2 were also abundant in highly reduced, organic- rich samples from engineered environments, such as landfills and oil production facilities. In addition, several MAGs affiliated to Helicobacter and Campylobacter were identified with high relative abundance in the metagenomes derived from mammalian digestive systems. Alteration of nitrogen cycling would probably not be ecologically significant in these environments; however, hydrogenotrophic DNRA metabolism may play other consequential roles, such as competing for H2 with anaerobic biogeochemical reactions of ecological and environmental importance like hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis, or aiding the survival of opportunistic pathogens in mammalian hosts [76, 77]. In addition, these environments could serve as a promising starting point for discovering new hydrogenotrophic DNRA-catalyzing isolates with fascinating physiological diversities. All these possibilities offer compelling opportunities for future research that would enhance our understanding of nitrogen- and hydrogen-cycling in diverse ecosystems.
Supplementary Material
Contributor Information
Hokwan Heo, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), Daejeon 34141, Republic of Korea.
Thanh Nguyen-Dinh, Department of Microbiology, Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3800, Australia.
Man-Young Jung, Interdisciplinary Graduate Program in Advance Convergence Technology and Science, Jeju National University, Jeju 63243, Republic of Korea; Department of Biology Education, Jeju National University, Jeju 63243, Republic of Korea.
Chris Greening, Department of Microbiology, Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3800, Australia.
Sukhwan Yoon, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), Daejeon 34141, Republic of Korea.
Author contributions
H.H. and S.Y. designed research; H.H. performed experiments; H.H., T.N.D., M.J., C.G., and S.Y. analyzed data; H.H. and T.N.D. prepared visualizations; and H.H., T.N.D., M.J., C.G., and S.Y. wrote the manuscript.
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Funding
This study was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2021R1A6A3A13044038, NRF-2021R1C1C1008303, NRF-2022R1A4A5031447, and RS-2024-00341771). The work at Monash University was supported by a National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) EL2 Fellowship (APP1178715) and an Australian Research Council (ARC) Discovery Project (DP210101595).
Data availability
The complete genomes and transcriptomic raw sequencing datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study were deposited in NCBI’s GenBank and Sequence Read Archive (SRA) databases, respectively (Accessions: CP175552.1 and CP159800.1 for complete genomes, SRX25285529/SRX25285530 and SRX25286366/SRX25286367 for transcriptomes).
References
- 1. Smil V. Enriching the Earth: Fritz Haber, Carl Bosch, and the Transformation of World Food Production. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 2000. 10.7551/mitpress/2767.001.0001 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Galloway JN, Aber JD, Erisman JW. et al. The nitrogen cascade. Bioscience. 2003;53:341–56. 10.1641/0006-3568(2003)053[0341:TNC]2.0.CO;2 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Galloway JN, Leach AM, Bleeker A. et al. A chronology of human understanding of the nitrogen cycle. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2013;368:20130120. 10.1098/rstb.2013.0120 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Rockstrom J, Gupta J, Qin D. et al. Safe and just earth system boundaries. Nature. 2023;619:102–11. 10.1038/s41586-023-06083-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Yoon S, Song B, Phillips RL. et al. Ecological and physiological implications of nitrogen oxide reduction pathways on greenhouse gas emissions in agroecosystems. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 2019;95:fiz066. 10.1093/femsec/fiz066 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Song GD, Liu SM, Zhang J. et al. Response of benthic nitrogen cycling to estuarine hypoxia. Limnol Oceanogr 2021;66:652–66. 10.1002/lno.11630 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Kuypers MMM, Marchant HK, Kartal B. The microbial nitrogen-cycling network. Nat Rev Microbiol 2018;16:263–76. 10.1038/nrmicro.2018.9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Butterbach-Bahl K, Baggs EM, Dannenmann M. et al. Nitrous oxide emissions from soils: how well do we understand the processes and their controls? Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2013;368:20130122. 10.1098/rstb.2013.0122 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Hu HW, Chen D, He JZ. Microbial regulation of terrestrial nitrous oxide formation: understanding the biological pathways for prediction of emission rates. FEMS Microbiol Rev 2015;39:729–49. 10.1093/femsre/fuv021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Saghai A, Hallin S. Diversity and ecology of NrfA-dependent ammonifying microorganisms. Trends Microbiol 2024;32:602–13. 10.1016/j.tim.2024.02.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Tiedje JM, Sexstone AJ, Myrold DD. et al. Denitrification: ecological niches, competition and survival. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 1982;48:569–83. 10.1007/BF00399542 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Einsle O, Messerschmidt A, Stach P. et al. Structure of cytochrome c nitrite reductase. Nature 1999;400:476–80. 10.1038/22802 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Kraft B, Tegetmeyer HE, Sharma R. et al. The environmental controls that govern the end product of bacterial nitrate respiration. Science 2014;345:676–9. 10.1126/science.1254070 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. van den Berg EM, van Dongen U, Abbas B. et al. Enrichment of DNRA bacteria in a continuous culture. ISME J 2015;9:2153–61. 10.1038/ismej.2015.26 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Yoon S, Cruz-Garcia C, Sanford R. et al. Denitrification versus respiratory ammonification: environmental controls of two competing dissimilatory NO3−/NO2− reduction pathways in Shewanella loihica strain PV-4. ISME J 2015;9:1093–104. 10.1038/ismej.2014.201 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Heo H, Kwon M, Song B. et al. Involvement of NO3− in ecophysiological regulation of dissimilatory nitrate/nitrite reduction to ammonium (DNRA) is implied by physiological characterization of soil DNRA bacteria isolated via a colorimetric screening method. Appl Environ Microbiol 2020;86:e01054-20. 10.1128/AEM.01054-20 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Carlson HK, Lui LM, Price MN. et al. Selective carbon sources influence the end products of microbial nitrate respiration. ISME J 2020;14:2034–45. 10.1038/s41396-020-0666-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Canfield DE, Stewart FJ, Thamdrup B. et al. A cryptic sulfur cycle in oxygen-minimum-zone waters off the Chilean coast. Science. 2010;330:1375–8. 10.1126/science.1196889 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Murphy AE, Bulseco AN, Ackerman R. et al. Sulphide addition favours respiratory ammonification (DNRA) over complete denitrification and alters the active microbial community in salt marsh sediments. Environ Microbiol 2020;22:2124–39. 10.1111/1462-2920.14969 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Delgado Vela J, Bristow LA, Marchant HK. et al. Sulfide alters microbial functional potential in a methane and nitrogen cycling biofilm reactor. Environ Microbiol 2021;23:1481–95. 10.1111/1462-2920.15352 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Coskun OK, Gomez-Saez GV, Beren M. et al. Quantifying genome-specific carbon fixation in a 750-meter deep subsurface hydrothermal microbial community. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 2024;100:fiae062. 10.1093/femsec/fiae062 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Kessler AJ, Wawryk M, Marzocchi U. et al. Cable bacteria promote DNRA through iron sulfide dissolution. Limnol Oceanogr 2019;64:1228–38. 10.1002/lno.11110 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Oshiki M, Ishii S, Yoshida K. et al. Nitrate-dependent ferrous iron oxidation by anaerobic ammonium oxidation (anammox) bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 2013;79:4087–93. 10.1128/AEM.00743-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Tikhonova TV, Slutsky A, Antipov AN. et al. Molecular and catalytic properties of a novel cytochrome c nitrite reductase from nitrate-reducing haloalkaliphilic sulfur-oxidizing bacterium Thioalkalivibrio nitratireducens. Biochim Biophys Acta 2006;1764:715–23. 10.1016/j.bbapap.2005.12.021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Thorup C, Schramm A, Findlay AJ. et al. Disguised as a sulfate reducer: growth of the deltaproteobacterium Desulfurivibrio alkaliphilus by sulfide oxidation with nitrate. mBio 2017;8:e00671–17. 10.1128/mBio.00671-17 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Greening C, Biswas A, Carere CR. et al. Genomic and metagenomic surveys of hydrogenase distribution indicate H2 is a widely utilised energy source for microbial growth and survival. ISME J 2016;10:761–77. 10.1038/ismej.2015.153 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Bay SK, Dong X, Bradley JA. et al. Trace gas oxidizers are widespread and active members of soil microbial communities. Nat Microbiol 2021;6:246–56. 10.1038/s41564-020-00811-w [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Khdhiri M, Piche-Choquette S, Tremblay J. et al. The tale of a neglected energy source: elevated hydrogen exposure affects both microbial diversity and function in soil. Appl Environ Microbiol 2017;83:e00275-17. 10.1128/AEM.00275-17 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Seitz HJ, Cypionka H. Chemolithotrophic growth of Desulfovibrio desulfuricans with hydrogen coupled to ammonification of nitrate or nitrite. Arch Microbiol 1986;146:63–7. 10.1007/Bf00690160 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Voordeckers JW, Starovoytov V, Vetriani C. Caminibacter mediatlanticus sp. nov., a thermophilic, chemolithoautotrophic, nitrate-ammonifying bacterium isolated from a deep-sea hydrothermal vent on the mid-Atlantic ridge. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2005;55:773–9. 10.1099/ijs.0.63430-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Strohm TO, Griffin B, Zumft WG. et al. Growth yields in bacterial denitrification and nitrate ammonification. Appl Environ Microbiol 2007;73:1420–4. 10.1128/AEM.02508-06 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Bokranz M, Katz J, Schroder I. et al. Energy metabolism and biosynthesis of vibrio succinogenes growing with nitrate or nitrite as terminal electron acceptor. Arch Microbiol 1983;135:36–41. 10.1007/BF00419479 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Sievert SM, Vetriani C. Chemoautotrophy at deep-sea nents: past, present, and future. Oceanography 2012;25:218–33. 10.5670/oceanog.2012.21 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Yoon S, Nissen S, Park D. et al. Nitrous oxide reduction kinetics distinguish bacteria harboring clade I NosZ from those harboring clade II NosZ. Appl Environ Microbiol 2016;82:3793–800. 10.1128/AEM.00409-16 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Sander R. Compilation of Henry's law constants (version 4.0) for water as solvent. Atmos Chem Phys 2015;15:4399–981. 10.5194/acp-15-4399-2015 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Miranda KM, Espey MG, Wink DA. A rapid, simple spectrophotometric method for simultaneous detection of nitrate and nitrite. Nitric Oxide 2001;5:62–71. 10.1006/niox.2000.0319 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Verdouw H, Vanechteld CJA, Dekkers EMJ. Ammonia determination based on indophenol formation with sodium salicylate. Water Res 1978;12:399–402. 10.1016/0043-1354(78)90107-0 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 2014;30:2114–20. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D. et al. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol 2012;19:455–77. 10.1089/cmb.2012.0021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Wick RR, Judd LM, Gorrie CL. et al. Completing bacterial genome assemblies with multiplex MinION sequencing. Microb Genom 2017;3:e000132. 10.1099/mgen.0.000132 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Wick RR, Judd LM, Gorrie CL. et al. Unicycler: resolving bacterial genome assemblies from short and long sequencing reads. PLoS Comput Biol 2017;13:e1005595. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005595 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Seemann T. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:2068–9. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu153 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Langmead B, Salzberg SL. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat Methods 2012;9:357–9. 10.1038/nmeth.1923 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A. et al. The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 2009;25:2078–9. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Liao Y, Smyth GK, Shi W. featureCounts: an efficient general purpose program for assigning sequence reads to genomic features. Bioinformatics 2014;30:923–30. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt656 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Love MI, Huber W, Anders S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol 2014;15:550. 10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Parks DH, Chuvochina M, Rinke C. et al. GTDB: an ongoing census of bacterial and archaeal diversity through a phylogenetically consistent, rank normalized and complete genome-based taxonomy. Nucleic Acids Res 2022;50:D785–94. 10.1093/nar/gkab776 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Hyatt D, Chen GL, Locascio PF. et al. Prodigal: prokaryotic gene recognition and translation initiation site identification. BMC Bioinformatics 2010;11:119. 10.1186/1471-2105-11-119 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Aramaki T, Blanc-Mathieu R, Endo H. et al. KofamKOALA: KEGG ortholog assignment based on profile HMM and adaptive score threshold. Bioinformatics 2020;36:2251–2. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz859 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Katoh K, Misawa K, Kuma K. et al. MAFFT: a novel method for rapid multiple sequence alignment based on fast Fourier transform. Nucleic Acids Res 2002;30:3059–66. 10.1093/nar/gkf436 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Sondergaard D, Pedersen CN, Greening C. HydDB: a web tool for hydrogenase classification and analysis. Sci Rep 2016;6:34212. 10.1038/srep34212 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Eddy SR. Accelerated profile HMM searches. PLoS Comput Biol 2011;7:e1002195. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002195 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Andrews S. FastQC: a quality control tool for high throughput sequence data. https://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc
- 54. Li H, Durbin R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with burrows-wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 2009;25:1754–60. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Pittman MS, Elvers KT, Lee L. et al. Growth of Campylobacter jejuni on nitrate and nitrite: electron transport to NapA and NrfA via NrfH and distinct roles for NrfA and the globin Cgb in protection against nitrosative stress. Mol Microbiol 2007;63:575–90. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2006.05532.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Benoit SL, Maier RJ, Sawers RG. et al. Molecular hydrogen metabolism: a widespread trait of pathogenic bacteria and protists. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 2020;84. 10.1128/MMBR.00092-19 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Vetriani C, Speck MD, Ellor SV. et al. Thermovibrio ammonificans sp. nov., a thermophilic, chemolithotrophic, nitrate-ammonifying bacterium from deep-sea hydrothermal vents. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2004;54:175–81. 10.1099/ijs.0.02781-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Miller WG, Parker CT, Rubenfield M. et al. The complete genome sequence and analysis of the Epsilonproteobacterium Arcobacter butzleri. PLoS One 2007;2:e1358. 10.1371/journal.pone.0001358 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Waite DW, Vanwonterghem I, Rinke C. et al. Comparative genomic analysis of the class Epsilonproteobacteria and proposed reclassification to Epsilonbacteraeota (phyl. Nov.). Front Microbiol 2017;8:682. 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00682 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Sorokin DY, Tikhonova TV, Koch H. et al. Trichlorobacter ammonificans, a dedicated acetate-dependent ammonifier with a novel module for dissimilatory nitrate reduction to ammonia. ISME J 2023;17:1639–48. 10.1038/s41396-023-01473-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Hardison AK, Algar CK, Giblin AE. et al. Influence of organic carbon and nitrate loading on partitioning between dissimilatory nitrate reduction to ammonium (DNRA) and N2 production. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 2015;164:146–60. 10.1016/j.gca.2015.04.049 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Martin W, Baross J, Kelley D. et al. Hydrothermal vents and the origin of life. Nat Rev Microbiol 2008;6:805–14. 10.1038/nrmicro1991 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Cabrol L, Marone A, Tapia-Venegas E. et al. Microbial ecology of fermentative hydrogen producing bioprocesses: useful insights for driving the ecosystem function. FEMS Microbiol Rev 2017;41:158–81. 10.1093/femsre/fuw043 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Cruz-Garcia C, Murray AE, Klappenbach JA. et al. Respiratory nitrate ammonification by Shewanella oneidensis MR-1. J Bacteriol 2007;189:656–62. 10.1128/JB.01194-06 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Caccavo F, Blakemore RP, Lovley DR. A hydrogen-oxidizing, Fe(III)-reducing microorganism from the Great Bay estuary, New Hampshire. Appl Environ Microbiol 1992;58:3211–6. 10.1128/aem.58.10.3211-3216.1992 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Duffner C, Kublik S, Fosel B. et al. Genotypic and phenotypic characterization of hydrogenotrophic denitrifiers. Environ Microbiol 2022;24:1887–901. 10.1111/1462-2920.15921 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Coskun OK, Vuillemin A, Schubotz F. et al. Quantifying the effects of hydrogen on carbon assimilation in a seafloor microbial community associated with ultramafic rocks. ISME J 2022;16:257–71. 10.1038/s41396-021-01066-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Wang H, Gunsalus RP. The nrfA and nirB nitrite reductase operons in Escherichia coli are expressed differently in response to nitrate than to nitrite. J Bacteriol 2000;182:5813–22. 10.1128/JB.182.20.5813-5822.2000 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Lewis WH, Tahon G, Geesink P. et al. Innovations to culturing the uncultured microbial majority. Nat Rev Microbiol 2021;19:225–40. 10.1038/s41579-020-00458-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Wang L, Cheng X, Guo Y. et al. Novel isolates of hydrogen-oxidizing chemolithoautotrophic Sulfurospirillum provide insight to the functions and adaptation mechanisms of campylobacteria in shallow-water hydrothermal vents. mSystems 2024;9:e00148-24. 10.1128/msystems.00148-24 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. Nakagawa S, Takai K, Inagaki F. et al. Distribution, phylogenetic diversity and physiological characteristics of epsilon-proteobacteria in a deep-sea hydrothermal field. Environ Microbiol 2005;7:1619–32. 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2005.00856.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72. Vetriani C, Voordeckers JW, Crespo-Medina M. et al. Deep-sea hydrothermal vent Epsilonproteobacteria encode a conserved and widespread nitrate reduction pathway (nap). ISME J. 2014;8:1510–21. 10.1038/ismej.2013.246 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73. Petersen JM, Zielinski FU, Pape T. et al. Hydrogen is an energy source for hydrothermal vent symbioses. Nature. 2011;476:176–80. 10.1038/nature10325 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74. Bourbonnais A, Lehmann MF, Butterfield DA. et al. Subseafloor nitrogen transformations in diffuse hydrothermal vent fluids of the Juan de Fuca ridge evidenced by the isotopic composition of nitrate and ammonium. Geochem Geophy Geosy 2012;13:Q02T01. 10.1029/2011gc003863 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 75. Schmidt K, Koschinsky A, Garbe-Schönberg D. et al. Geochemistry of hydrothermal fluids from the ultramafic-hosted Logatchev hydrothermal field, 15°N on the mid-Atlantic ridge: temporal and spatial investigation. Chem Geol 2007;242:1–21. 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2007.01.023 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 76. Olson JW, Maier RJ. Molecular hydrogen as an energy source for Helicobacter pylori. Science 2002;298:1788–90. 10.1126/science.1077123 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77. Greening C, Geier R, Wang C. et al. Diverse hydrogen production and consumption pathways influence methane production in ruminants. ISME J 2019;13:2617–32. 10.1038/s41396-019-0464-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The complete genomes and transcriptomic raw sequencing datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study were deposited in NCBI’s GenBank and Sequence Read Archive (SRA) databases, respectively (Accessions: CP175552.1 and CP159800.1 for complete genomes, SRX25285529/SRX25285530 and SRX25286366/SRX25286367 for transcriptomes).








