. 2025 Jul 24;15(32):26515–26536. doi: 10.1039/d5ra03487f

Table 4. Comparative performance metrics of Cs₂SnX₆-based solar cell configurations^a.

Type	Structure	V _OC (V)	J _SC (mA cm⁻²)	FF (%)	PCE (%)	Ref.
E	FTO/TiO₂/Cs₂SnI₆/P3HT	0.52	3.2	51.5	0.86	70
E	FTO/TiO₂/Cs₂SnI₆/Dye	0.67	16.3	61.8	6.8	71
E	FTO/TiO₂/Cs₂SnI₆	0.67	12.56	0.50	4.23	72
S	ITO/CuI/Cs₂SnI₆/PCBM	0.86	23.91	71.08	14.65	73
S	FTO/TiO₂/Cs₂SnI₆/Cu₂O	0.74	30.00	80.50	17.77	74
S	FTO/SnS₂/Cs₂SnI₆	0.451	70.17	78.78	24.95	This work(optimized)
S	FTO/ZnS/Cs₂SnCl₆	1.45	22.71	76.05	25.05	This work(optimized)
S	FTO/IGZO/Cs₂SnBr₆	1.059	28.65	86.44	26.22	This work(optimized)

E = experimental, S = simulation.

Table 4. Comparative performance metrics of Cs2SnX6-based solar cell configurationsa.