Skip to main content
Springer logoLink to Springer
. 2025 Apr 15;62(8):10813–10833. doi: 10.1007/s12035-025-04846-0

Microbiome Gut-Brain-Axis: Impact on Brain Development and Mental Health

Yasmin N Ramadan 1,, Saleh F Alqifari 2, Khaled Alshehri 3, Amirah Alhowiti 4, Hyder Mirghani 5, Tariq Alrasheed 5, Faisal Aljohani 6, Abdulaziz Alghamdi 7, Helal F Hetta 8
PMCID: PMC12289773  PMID: 40234288

Abstract

The current discovery that the gut microbiome, which contains roughly 100 trillion microbes, affects health and disease has catalyzed a boom in multidisciplinary research efforts focused on understanding this relationship. Also, it is commonly demonstrated that the gut and the CNS are closely related in a bidirectional pathway. A balanced gut microbiome is essential for regular brain activities and emotional responses. On the other hand, the CNS regulates the majority of GI physiology. Any disruption in this bidirectional pathway led to a progression of health problems in both directions, neurological and gastrointestinal diseases. In this review, we hope to shed light on the complicated connections of the microbiome-gut-brain axis and the critical roles of gut microbiome in the early development of the brain in order to get a deeper knowledge of microbiome-mediated pathological conditions and management options through rebalancing of gut microbiome.

Keywords: Gut microbiome, Gut-brain axis, Brain development

Introduction

“All disease begins in the gut”; this statement is said to have been stated by the Greek doctor Hippocrates, who is sometimes named with father of modern medicine, more than 2000 years ago. Whether or not Hippocrates is the true author is debatable, yet its innate wisdom still has an impact on medical researchers and physicians nowadays [1].

The recognition that the brain and gut interact in continuous, bidirectional interaction dates back to Ancient Greece, when scientists such as Hippocrates, Plato, and Aristotle proposed that the brain and other parts of the body are fundamentally linked. This idea led to the realization that studying the processes of illness requires considering the full person instead of just one or two separate organ systems [2]. Nonetheless, William Beaumont conducted experiments before the 1840s that demonstrated how emotional state impacted the pace of digestion, indicating that the brain influences the gut and that a brain-gut axis exists. Even though this notion was thereafter recognized by Darwin, Pavlov, James, Bernard, and Cannon [3], it took until the beginning to mid-twentieth century for the initial scientifically documented findings that associated gut physiology modifies alongside swings in emotion. However, due to primitive technologies and a scarcity of research on the reciprocal consequences of altered gut physiology on brain performance, these investigations were constrained. Recent research has supported the links between gut and brain health [4]. Much research found a high correlation between a variety of host illnesses and alterations in the microbiome composition, or “dysbiosis” [5, 6]. It has been reported that any alteration in the gut microbiome may be linked to developing a variety of CNS illnesses. Furthermore, the reciprocal connections can now be seen for the first time thanks to the advancement in brain imaging, revealing that important brain areas that participate in emotion regulation may be activated by gut signals [3].

The human gut microbiome is a rich and diverse ecosystem made up of commensal bacteria, viruses, fungi, and archaea [710]. This ecosystem starts to colonize the GI during in-utero life [11]. The growth and colonization of gut microorganisms co-occur alongside brain growth during pregnancy and continue up to a few years after delivery. Throughout the initial 12 months of postnatal development, the microbiome composition differs greatly between individuals until it stabilizes and resembles an adult at around 3 years of age [1215]. This variability may affect the development of the brain and shape an individual’s immune profile. In a healthy individual, early mucosal colonization is critical for the formation and maturation of the host’s immune system [13]. Early childhood gut dysbiosis, however, can result from exposure to conditions including maternal immune activation (MIA), improper nutrition, illness/infections, and antibiotic overuse [16, 17]. The disrupted gut microbiome can promote inappropriate immune function, leading to systemic inflammation and symptoms linked with neurodevelopmental psychiatric disorders (NPD) [1820]. Therefore, the effectiveness of the immune system, which subsequently controls neurodevelopmental pathways, depends on the existence of a balanced microbiome [21, 22].

Despite rising data, there is still a considerable gap in knowing the precise mechanisms that regulate the connection between GIT and the brain through health and illness. This review will shed a spotlight on the complex links of the microbiome-gut-brain axis and the critical roles of gut microbiome in early brain development to gain a deeper understanding of microbiome-mediated pathological conditions, noninvasive prognostic pathways, and management options utilizing microbiome-gut-brain-axis adjustments.

Gut-Brain Axis

The gut forms a complex, bidirectional link with the CNS, known as gut-brain axis, active in both health and illness [3]. This interaction enables gut sensory impulses, transmitted via the vagus nerve, to impact CNS activity, controlling reflexes and modulating mood. The brain then uses these signals to alter gut physiology as well as other functions. Signals are transmitted through pathways like the enteric nervous system (ENS), autonomic nervous system (ANS), hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, sympatho-adrenal axis, and descending monoaminergic pathways, involving both afferent (signal-receiving) and efferent (signal-sending) neurons [3, 23]. Multiple inter-relational and neurohumoral elements regulate and closely connect to each pathway. In significant part, the innate innervation of gut functions is mediated by the intricate neuronal network known as the ENS. It is composed of the myenteric and submucosal plexuses, two ganglionated plexuses that control gut peristalsis, absorption, and secretion [24]. In gut-brain communication, the ENS sends signals to the CNS through intestinofugal neurons that connect to the sympathetic nervous system (SNS), while sensory information travels via vagal afferent pathways [24].

The ANS is a network of sympathetic and parasympathetic neurons [3]. ANS regulates respiration, heart rate, and CNS-mediated alterations in the GIT and related processes, including digestion, GI motility, and permeability, bile secretion, carbohydrate metabolism, mechanical mucosal distortion, luminal osmolality, preservation of epithelial fluid balance, mucus production, as well as mucosal immune response [3, 25]. The CNS sends direct signals from the ANS to the gut, affecting its physiology. The gut microbiome communicates through metabolites that are recognized by host cells, which then interact with ANS synapses in the gut [26]. Additionally, the ANS can influence the gut epithelium, impacting immune system activation either by directly altering immune cell responses to the microbiome or by changing how the microbiome interacts with immune cells [27, 28].

Microbiome Gut-Brain Axis (MGBA)

The signaling pathway underlying the connection between the gut-brain axis and the microbiome is very important when thinking about therapeutic approaches. The brain influences gut functions via the HPA axis and the ANS; for instance, norepinephrine (NEP) is produced by the brain under stress and has been shown to promote the proliferation of gut pathogens [29]. On the other hand, the gut impacts CNS function through microbiome metabolites, neuroactive agents, and gut hormones that reach the brain through the vagus nerve, circulatory system, immune system, or ENS (Figure 1) [30, 31].

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Microbiome gut-brain axis. The brain can affect the gut through various pathways, like the enteric nervous system (ENS), autonomic nervous system (ANS), hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis, sympatho-adrenal axis, and descending monoaminergic pathways, involving both afferent (signal-receiving) and efferent (signal-sending) neurons. On the other hand, the gut impacts CNS function through microbiome metabolites, neuroactive agents, and gut hormones that reach the brain through the vagus nerve, circulatory system, immune system, or ENS. Created with BioRender

Together, gut hormones, neuroactive compounds, and microbial metabolites form a complex signaling network that directly impacts brain function and mental health. For instance, short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) like butyrate and propionate, produced through microbial fermentation, not only maintain gut integrity but also influence brain functions such as mood regulation and cognitive processes. SCFAs cross the blood-brain barrier (BBB) and interact with receptors like GPR41 and GPR43, modulating neuroinflammation and neurotransmitter release [32].

Similarly, gut-derived serotonin and dopamine play dual roles. Enterochromaffin cells produce serotonin in the gut, which affects not only gut motility but also transmits signals to the CNS via the vagus nerve. Deficiencies in gut-derived serotonin are linked to mood disorders such as depression. Neuroactive compounds like gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA), synthesized by gut bacteria, impact stress response and anxiety through the vagal pathway [33]. By integrating these pathways, we can better understand the gut microbiome’s central role in mental health disorders.

These pathways are collectively known as the MGBA. Interestingly, the vagus nerve is the most direct link out of all the potential paths since various receptors on the vagal afferents sense and send signals from the gut to the brain. Actually, it has been discovered that the vagus nerve affects CNS reward neurons, which in turn affects CNS mood and behavior [34]. The microbiome is essential for the induction, regulation, and function of both systemic and local immune responses, including innate and adaptive immunity. This makes the gut-immune-brain connection critical to overall health. Pre-clinical models have confirmed this, as germ-free (GF) mice exhibit significant immune deficiencies, such as enhanced vulnerability to infections due to decreased Peyer’s patch size and function, absence of the mucous layer, changed IgA secretions, and decreased proinflammatory T helper (Th) cell secretions [35, 36].

Gut Microbiome-Derived Metabolites

Significant parts of the MGBA are the metabolites and products derived from the microbiome and mostly work via receptor-mediated interactions on a variety of host cells or tissues. SCFAs and endogenous tryptophan are two of the most well-studied metabolites. SCFAs—a byproduct of the microbial breakdown of carbohydrates—have been proposed to support glucose homeostasis, lymphocyte function, mucosal serotonin secretion, and learning and memory acquisition through maintaining BBB integrity [36]. Studies are few, but it is expected that SCFAs can potentially penetrate the BBB because the metabolite can be identified in human CSF and SCFA absorption was successfully seen in rats following the injection of labeled, 14C, SCFAs into the carotid artery [37]. GF animals showed increased BBB permeability, which supports the significance of SCFAs in CNS homeostasis. In contrast, BBB integrity is restored when the mice are recolonized with SCFA-producing bacteria [32]. Mechanistically, research has shown that SCFAs interact with G-protein coupled receptors (GPR) for a range of various functions, including GPR41 in enteric neurons and GPR43 in adipose tissues [38]. However, the findings have been inconsistent. For instance, acetate, a prominent SCFA from the gut microbiome, has been shown to control food intake in one study [39] yet inferred to boost food intake via ghrelin secretion in another [40].

It is also important to discuss how dietary tryptophan is converted by microbes into indole compounds. Recently, it was discovered that some bacteria, specifically those belonging to the Lactobacillus genus, are essential for activating the aryl hydrocarbon receptor, which in turn regulates the cell cycle and promotes T-cell differentiation [41]. Significantly, research has shown how dietary tryptophan is crucial for encephalitogenic T cell responses, which trigger CNS autoimmunity [42].

Gut Microbiome-Derived products

Additionally, microbiome-derived products are important in MGBA communication. They do this frequently by interacting with toll-like receptors (TLR) in the CNS and ENS, which can detect the products by their molecular patterns. For instance, it has been demonstrated that (TLR-4), which is mostly found on CNS microglia, may detect lipopolysaccharide (LPS), the substance secreted by Gram-negative bacteria. This recognition in turn stimulates the synthesis and proliferation of proinflammatory cytokines [43, 44]. Significantly, this immune response has caused neuroinflammation, activation of microglia, and death of neural cells, all of which have contributed to cognitive disorders and have been linked to anxiety and depression [45]. Polysaccharide A, a different important microbiome-derived product, is produced by B. fragilis and identified by TLR-2, inducing a protective CNS anti-inflammatory effect [46].

In summary, the interactions between microbiome-derived metabolites and products within the MGBA are incredibly complex and varied. For example, a single metabolite may interact with several receptors located in various tissues and cell types, leading to a variety of physiological, immunological, and CNS reactions. In the future, medical treatment with SCFAs may be a specifically viable choice, and investigations in models of Parkinson’s disease [47], Alzheimer’s disease [48], multiple sclerosis [49, 50], and autism spectrum disorder [51] are currently ongoing, but with mixed results.

Gut Hormones

Gut hormones also play a crucial role to take into account in gut-brain transmission. There are a number of gut hormones (such as ghrelin, CCK, and 5-HT) that are correlated with anxiety and depression, which supports the supposed associations between obesity and mood disorders [52]. One of the best-studied gut hormones, 5-HT has a broad range of receptor subtypes and locations. It has been shown that 5-HT when synthesized by enterochromaffin cells (EECs) stimulates the release of cytokines from lymphocytes and monocytes and can communicate with the CNS by stimulating vagal sensory afferents [53, 54]. Therefore, it is important to note that the microbiome plays a major role in the synthesis and release of gut hormones. For instance, GF mice have much lower 5-HT and dopamine levels than normal, and it was discovered that GLP-1 secretion is facilitated by indirect interactions with LPS and SCFAs, respectively [55, 56]. But it is also crucial to remember that gut hormones can have an impact on the microbiome. For example, 5-HT can be produced and secreted into the gut lumen by EECs, which changes the gut microbiome profile [56]. Thus, to inform the development of CNS therapeutics, it is critical to distinguish between the causes and effects of the interaction between gut hormones and gut microbiome going ahead and to interpret the research findings.

Neuroactive Compounds

Another category of gut microbiome-associated compounds that regulate the MGBA via the ENS is neuroactive compounds (Figure 2). The gut microbiome has been shown to regulate, and possibly produce, neuroactive compounds like acetylcholine, noradrenaline, dopamine, histamine, GABA, and melatonin, which in turn influence the CNS [5, 28]. Since these neuroactive compounds cannot cross the BBB, it is yet unclear how they impact the CNS [31]. More research into the mechanism of gut-modified neuroactive compounds is required. 

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Different pathways of gut microbiome-derived neurotransmitters. Several neurotransmitters have been identified from different microbiome spp. found in the human gut. The synthesis of neurotransmitters by microbes offers a possible route of direct brain and behavioral modulation. Actually, this pathway is restricted as the majority of neurotransmitters—such as GABA, dopamine, and serotonin—generally cannot cross the BBB. Other potential pathways include the idea that neurotransmitters produced from microbiomes influence the brain via the vagus nerve and its afferent neurons. An alternative pathway is that neurotransmitter precursors are transformed into active neurotransmitters after passing through the BBB. For instance, tryptophan’s availability and metabolism—a precursor to serotonin—can be influenced by gut microbiome. Given that there is a correlation between brain serotonin levels and tryptophan content in the bloodstream, this might have an impact on serotonergic signaling in the CNS (modified from [ 33 ], created with BioRender)

Direct Microbiome Invasion

Microorganisms may also directly invade the blood-brain barrier (BBB), but the exact pathways and entry points remain unclear. While the bacterial load and duration required for invasion vary by pathogen, a key factor in bacterial pathogenesis is often the colonization of mucosal surfaces and prolonged survival in the bloodstream. Here, bacteria can evade phagocytosis and other immune defenses before reaching brain endothelial cells and ultimately breaching the BBB through various pathways [57]. After bacterial adherence to the brain endothelium, bacteria might cross the endothelium by a paracellular route through breaking intercellular connections, a transcellular route through brain endothelial cells, or possibly a Trojan-Horse mechanism through infected phagocytes [58]. However, it is important to keep in mind that many results are still uncertain. For instance, the validity of in vitro studies on pathogen adhesion in the body is still debated, as bacteria need to survive blood flow in vivo. Nevertheless, BBB invasion continues to be a major clinical concern when treating neurological disorders. Therefore, understanding how bacteria survive through direct interactions with CNS barriers is key to developing better therapeutic strategies.

Role of Gut Microbiome in the Early Development of the Brain

The beginning of colonization and development of the gut microbiome occurs concomitantly with brain development during the pregnancy and continues until a few years after delivery [59, 60]. During the crucial embryonic stage, an imbalance in the gut microbiome might affect the entire developmental process, particularly the maturation and growth of neurons and glia [61]. Recent research indicates that the microbiome actively participates in the development of the CNS. Gut microbiomes are now known to actively participate in several neurodevelopmental processes, such as neurogenesis [62], myelination [63, 64], formation of the BBB [65], microglial maturation [66] as well as hypothalamus pituitary adrenal axis [67] (Figure 3). Our cognition and behavior are greatly influenced by these processes. The maturation and appropriate functioning of neuronal cells in the growing brain depend on a variety of dietary molecules and metabolites secreted from the gut [68, 69]. Furthermore, different research suggested that gut microorganisms might directly boost brain development processes, with long-term health consequences [18]. A person’s immune profile and processes related to brain development can be influenced by their microbiome composition, which varies most within and between individuals during the first 12 months after delivery and stabilizes at around 3 years of age [12, 13]. For a healthy individual, early colonization of the mucosal surfaces is crucial for the immune system’s development and maturation [13].

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

The role of the gut microbiome in early brain development. The gut microbiome is crucial for several stages of brain development, including regulation and maintenance of BBB permeability, neurogenesis, microglial maturation, myelination, HPA axis development, and HPA axis stress response. Any changes in this developmental phase can raise the risk of neurodevelopmental diseases considerably (modified from [115], created with BioRender)

One the other hand, gut dysbiosis in infancy may be caused by several factors including excessive use of antibiotics, illness, infections, and maternal immune activation (MIA) [16, 17, 70]. The dysregulated immune activation resulting from altered gut microbiome can promote systemic inflammation and abnormal brain development, which can produce symptoms linked to neurodevelopmental psychiatric disorders (NPD) [18, 19, 21]. Accordingly, proper immune system functions, which in turn control neurodevelopmental pathways, depend on the existence of a balanced microbiome [13, 21, 22].

Neurogenesis

The term “neurogenesis” describes the process by which neural stem/progenitor cells differentiate into new, functioning neurons [71]. This neurogenesis process is crucial for cognition, memory, learning, and stress response, particularly in the hippocampus, which serves as the cognitive center [72].

A balanced gut microbiome has a direct or indirect role in maintaining the milieu necessary for neural development [73]. Salvo et al. demonstrated that microbiome dysbiosis in pediatric animal models of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) may result in behavioral deficits, decreased neurogenesis, neuroinflammation, and altered expression of pattern recognition receptor genes in the hippocampus [74]. In another animal study, a comparison of gut microbial metabolites in germ-free (GF) and specific pathogen-free (SPF) mice reveals a variety of substances that can stimulate and control the prenatal developmental process and penetrate the placenta into the fetal area [75].

Moreover, it has been reported that peptidoglycan can cross the placenta and enter the fetal brain, where it stimulates Toll-like receptor 2 (TLR2). This increases the expression of FOXG1, a transcription factor that is essential for controlling neurogenesis and development, ultimately leading to the proliferation of neurons in the forebrain region [76, 77]. Neuronal plasticity and maturation are linked to the process of synapse formation and maturation. It has been observed that the experimental delivery of neonatal prebiotics to 22-day-old rats, as opposed to other prebiotics, increases the levels of synaptophysin and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) in the hippocampus [78].

Additionally, the gut microbiome may have an indirect impact on neuronal plasticity by controlling neuronal migration and maturation in the CNS. This could happen through the regulation of the reelin and ephrin B pathway, wherein reelin, a membrane glycoprotein responsible for neuronal migration, and ephrin B play a crucial role in maintaining the integrity of the gut epithelial barrier [7982].

The regulation of adult neurogenesis by gut microbiome has also been documented in a number of investigations. In this regard, Ogbonnaya et al. showed that when proliferating cells in the brain of GF mice were labeled with bromo-deoxyuridine, an increase in adult dorsal hippocampus neurogenesis was seen as compared to conventionally raised animals, and the phenotypical state could not be reversed even after microbial colonization. This suggests that the lack of microorganisms causes an abnormal rise in adult dorsal hippocampal neurogenesis and that microbiological signals during a critical early developmental period influence hippocampal neurogenesis [83]. Additionally, gut microorganisms have the ability to produce and release serotonin into the gut lumen, which is known to stimulate adult neurogenesis [84].

Myelination

A balanced gut microbiome has been documented to influence myelination. Usually, humans are born with unmyelinated axons in the CNS [63]. Within a few years after birth, oligodendrocytes quickly myelinate growing axons by engaging and enveloping them in a mechanism that varies in both myelination rate and myelin content until early adulthood [8587]. Any deviation from this procedure might result in persistent problems. Cognitive function is primarily dependent on myelination, and neuronal plasticity and function have been related to the degree of myelination [88, 89]. The gut microbiome modulates the crucial process of myelination by influencing the expression of myelination-related genes in oligodendrocytes. Deformities of the myelin sheath can negatively affect behavior and brain function [63, 90]. Specifically, the brain’s prefrontal cortex (PFC) region myelinates later in infancy, during the early stages of development, leaving it more susceptible to outside influences such as intestinal dysbiosis. For instance, in GF mice, the myelin development in the PFC area is distorted which negatively impacts social behavior [63, 91]. In addition, bacterial metabolites such as SCFAs have been reported to be advantageous in regulating the myelination process, intestinal barrier malfunction and behavioral issues brought on by stress [91, 92]. Moreover, Oral administration of SCFA butyrate resulted in a restoration of intestinal physiology, behavioral deficit, and myelination impairments in mice treated with antibiotics. This suggests that the gut microbiome plays a crucial role in establishing the microbiome-gut-brain (MGB) axis by regulating the myelination process in the PFC region [93]. Therefore, the microbiome plays a critical role in both myelination and the preservation of the myelin sheath’s flexibility.

Formation of Blood–Brain Barrier

The blood-brain barrier (BBB), the narrow barrier separating the brain from the systemic circulation, is formed early in pregnancy by capillary endothelial cells secured by tight junction proteins, astrocytes, and pericytes [32]. It also allows the interchange of elements and nutrients required for appropriate brain upkeep and function [94]. To maintain and control the development of an intact BBB, a balanced gut microbiome and its metabolites, such as SCFAs, are necessary [32, 94, 95]. BBB permeability declines with age in growing sterile babies [96]. It has been demonstrated that the permeability of the BBB for molecules rises in germ-free (GF) mice owing to lower levels of the crucial junctional proteins claudin-5 and occludin in the brain endothelial layer. Additionally, the permeability of BBB in GF mice was achieved by microbial colonization of the gut or by administering butyrate, SCFA generated by gut microbial fermentation [32].

Microglial Maturation

The glial system contains resident immune cells called microglia (macrophages). They are widely dispersed throughout the brain and spinal cord [97] and make up about 10–15% of the total number of glial cells in the CNS [98]. In contrast to neuronal cells, microglial cells that comprise the CNS’s intrinsic immune system are produced from a subgroup of naive macrophages that start from the yolk sac progenitor cell [99101]. Microglia are involved in both immunological defense and CNS maintenance. Microglial cells, for example, continuously monitor their local surroundings to identify pathogenic infiltration or tissue damage throughout the CNS, which is protected by the BBB [100, 102]. Inflammation is aberrantly induced by abnormal microglia activation, and this is seen in the majority of brain-related diseases. According to accumulating data, microglia have a direct impact on neuronal dysfunction and lead to disease development [103106]. Recent studies have revealed the critical function of gut microbiome in the growth and maturation of microglia [66, 107109]. Microglial cells in GF mice have a dramatically impaired developmental state, together with morphological features and a gene expression pattern associated with a developmental and maturation stall instance. These GF mice-derived microglia had a restricted response to infections which was significantly restored by SCFA treatment [110]. Moreover, bone marrow-derived macrophages can replace damaged or depleted microglial macrophages and yolk progenitor cells by boosting their growth and differentiation with the aid of early signals from the gut microbiome [66, 111].

Hypothalamus Pituitary Adrenal (HPA) Axis

The HPA axis refers to the endocrine-neurocrine interaction between the hypothalamus, pituitary, and adrenal gland as a consequence of stress. The corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) is one of the key players in this process because it triggers a series of events that cause the adrenal cortex to release glucocorticoids by controlling the HPA axis [112]. The development of the HPA axis is also significantly influenced by the gut microbiome [67]. For instance, GF mice’s hypothalamus showed higher levels of CRF mRNA in contrast to specific-pathogen-free (SPF) animals, suggesting an improved stress response connected to the HPA-axis [113]. Another study found that giving a probiotic mixture containing Lactobacillus helveticus and Bifidobacterium longum significantly reduced anxiety levels [114].

Microbiome Gut-Brain Axis Throughout the Life Cycle

The gut microbiome has served as our lifelong friend throughout the journey of development. This diverse ecosystem is in continual fluctuation throughout our lifecycle [116]. Minor daily differences in the microbiome composition are typically seen among people, but these shifts become most apparent when we look throughout our lifetime. In terms of both diversity and prevalence of certain taxa, the microbiome at the two extremes of life differs noticeably from the usual adult gut microbiome [117119].

Early Life

The first colonization of the human GI tract is a topic of debate. Some recent studies have shown that there is a placental microbiome and that the fetus is colonizing the GI tract in-utero [11, 120, 121]; others, however, claim that the uterus and placenta are sterile [122125]. If in-utero colonization occurs, it appears to possess a minimal impact on the composition of the early postnatal microbiome compared to the initial inoculation of the microbiome at birth.

It is challenging to define exactly what makes a healthy microbiome in the early stages of development. Nonetheless, it is well recognized that the microbiome typically develops along one of a few pathways, with early-colonizing species affecting the long-term makeup [126]. Enterobacteriaceae, Bifidobacteriaceae, and Clostridiaceae are usually found in relatively large levels in the microbiome shortly after birth, whereas Lachnospiraceae and Ruminococcaceae are found at lower levels [127129]. As the baby grows, strict anaerobes eventually constitute dominant taxa. Around 1–3 years of age, when the baby starts to wean and consume solid food, the total diversity increases to adult-like levels [12, 130]. Generally, children’s gut microbiome is significantly enriched in pathways that promote continual growth (such as genes involved in de novo folate synthesis, vitamin synthesis, and anti-inflammatory pathways) [131].

The GF mice have been established to be very useful in understanding the function of the microbiome in gut-brain transmission throughout life [132]. In fact, in pregnant rodents, the GF status has a significant impact on the development of offspring. For instance, in the mouse, the BBB normally establishes throughout the second week of pregnancy, with permeability reducing rapidly around embryonic day 15. Significantly, this study found that postnatal recolonization of the microbiome might reestablish BBB integrity, suggesting a significant function of the microbiome in establishing BBB formation [32]. In conjunction with the mother’s GF status, additional prenatal maternal characteristics have also been discovered to affect the makeup of the child’s microbiome in rats and/or humans. These factors include nutrition [133], obesity [134], immunological activation [135], and stress [136, 137]. All of these factors are known to change both the physical and mental outcomes of the offspring [138].

In humans, the evidence suggesting long-term impacts of early life microbiome alterations on host physiology and brain health is mostly correlated. This evidence reveals a relationship between early-life microbiome composition and later metabolic and immune response [139142]. There has been encouraging evidence from early clinical trials that probiotic therapies for children at risk can lower the likelihood of GIT issues [143145], sepsis [146148], and even attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) [149] and autism spectrum disorder [149, 150]. Additionally, early life gut microbiome plays a critical role in shaping the brain’s neural circuits and stress response systems. Disruptions during this period can have lasting effects on cognitive function and mental health. Recent research [151] shows that early dysbiosis impacts neurogenesis, while Lynch et al. [152] emphasize its role in synaptic formation during critical developmental stages. Such studies are becoming increasingly common due to substantial preclinical evidence that early-life alteration of the microbiome affects a broad spectrum of behavioral and neurological consequences earlier in development and later in life [5, 153160].

Adolescence

Adolescence is a period of significant brain development, including synaptic pruning, myelination, and hormonal changes. These processes shape cognitive function, behavior, and stress responses. Given the rapid brain remodeling and changes in social and lifestyle habits during adolescence, it is not surprising that this period is associated with increased vulnerability to mental health issues like anxiety and depression. [161164]. [165167]. Changes in the gut microbiome during this critical phase are thought to influence these developmental processes. Studies show that disruptions to the MGBA in adolescence can alter social behavior and stress responses well into adulthood [152].

Prevotella and Sutterella were less common in teenagers, although Bifidobacterium and Clostridium were more common. Changes in microbiome composition during adolescence, including shifts in microbial diversity, are linked to developmental brain processes, but more research is needed to understand how these changes influence behavior and mental health.[168]. Research on mice has demonstrated that sex differences in the microbiome do not appear until puberty [169] and that probiotic administration during early life stress overcomes stress-induced alterations in the onset of puberty [170]. Moreover, adult cognition, social behavior, and anxiety are changed by prolonged antibiotic-induced dysbiosis of the microbiome in adolescence. Additionally, this long-term medication changed the way that adults metabolize tryptophan and decreased brain levels of oxytocin, vasopressin, and BDNF [158, 171, 172].

Aging

Aging impacts the gut microbiome, contributing to cognitive decline and neuroinflammation. However, these age-related changes often stem from the early-life gut microbiome, which lays the foundation for long-term brain health. Early gut colonization influences neuroimmune regulation and stress response systems, which continue to affect brain resilience throughout life [151, 152].

Disruptions in early microbiome composition can lead to long-term neurodevelopmental consequences, increasing susceptibility to neurodegenerative conditions such as Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and Parkinson’s disease (PD) in older age [173175]. For example, early dysbiosis may alter SCFA production, impairing neuroinflammation control and BBB integrity—both critical factors in age-related neurodegeneration [176].

Although aging is associated with a decline in beneficial bacteria like Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium, these changes are often linked to the initial microbiome composition established in infancy and adolescence. Addressing gut health early in life may help mitigate cognitive decline and frailty in aging populations [152].

In summary, the MGBA throughout the life cycle underscores the importance of early life microbiome in shaping brain health and cognitive resilience in aging. Focusing on gut health during critical developmental windows could be key to reducing the risk of neurodegenerative diseases later in life.

How Does Gut Microbiome Dysbiosis Affect the Gut-Brain Axis?

Gut microbiome dysbiosis has been increasingly associated with several neurodevelopmental and neurodegenerative disorders. Disruptions in the gut microbiome can affect brain function through mechanisms such as neuroinflammation, altered neurotransmitter synthesis, and immune system modulation. [28, 96, 177179]. This section explores how gut dysbiosis leads to abnormal brain function in various disorders, focusing on depression, anxiety, neurodevelopmental disorders, and neurodegenerative diseases. Table 1 summarizes the impact of gut microbiome dysbiosis on different neurological disorders. 

Table 1.

Summary of key findings and mechanisms linking gut microbiome dysbiosis to neurological disorders

Disorders Key Findings References
Autism spectrum disorder (ASD)

- Gut dysbiosis linked to increased Clostridia and decreased beneficial Bifidobacterium

- This imbalance led to neuroinflammation, disrupted serotonin and GABA signaling

- Early life microbiome imbalances may have a long-lasting effect on brain development and shape neural circuits involved in behavior, emotion, and cognition

- Reduction in bile-metabolizing Bifidobacterium and Blautia species which is linked to deficiencies in bile acid and tryptophan metabolism, leading to gastrointestinal dysfunction and impaired social interactions in BTBR mice

[151, 180, 181]
Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)

- Dysbiosis affects neurotransmitter production (serotonin, dopamine)

- Reduced SCFAs and neuroinflammation contribute to cognitive deficits

- Impaired gut-brain signaling influences attention and behavior

[182, 183]
Parkinson’s disease (PD)

- Early gut pathology, including α-synuclein in the enteric nervous system (ENS)

- Dysbiosis with increased Enterobacteriaceae and decreased Prevotellaceae linked to PD severity

- Microbiome shifts may serve as early diagnostic markers

[184186]
Alzheimer’s disease (AD)

- Gut-derived metabolites trigger the NLRP3 inflammasome, leading to amyloid-β accumulation and tau/Aβ42 AD hyperphosphorylation

- Dysbiosis associated with amyloid plaque overproduction and neuroinflammation

[187191]
Multiple sclerosis (MS)

- Dysbiosis with Akkermansia muciniphila and Acinetobacter calcoaceticus leads to impaired Treg function and increased pro-inflammatory T cell responses

- Higher levels of Fusobacteria may be linked to increased risk of MS relapses

- FMT from MS patients exacerbates disease in mice

[192, 193]
Depression and anxiety

- Dysbiosis leads to serotonin depletion via impaired tryptophan metabolism

- Neuroinflammation and gut-derived LPS can cross the BBB and activate microglia, leading to release of pro-inflammatory cytokines

- Gut dysbiosis reduces GABA production and increases glutamate activity, heightening anxiety

- HPA-axis dysregulation increases cortisol levels, perpetuating stress and inflammation

[28, 32, 33, 45, 48, 67, 151, 176, 194]
Brain tumors

- Microbiome influences tumor progression and immune responses

Notable variations in the percentage of Firmicutes to Bacteroides, beta diversity, and the proportional prevalence of Verrcomicrobia and Akkermansia in stool samples from glioma patients and mice models compared to healthy controls

[195, 196]

Neurodevelopmental Disorders

Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD)

Gut dysbiosis in individuals with ASD has been consistently linked to significant changes in microbial composition, including a higher abundance of Clostridia species and a reduction in beneficial bacteria such as Bifidobacterium [180]. These microbial imbalances are thought to contribute to neuroinflammation, a key feature in ASD pathophysiology. Dysbiosis alters the gut-brain communication pathways, leading to disruptions in the synthesis of critical neurotransmitters such as serotonin and GABA, both of which are crucial for mood regulation, social behavior, and cognitive function. Serotonin, for instance, regulates brain circuits involved in social communication, and GABA helps maintain the balance between excitatory and inhibitory signaling in the brain [180]. In line with these findings, Golubeva et al. reported that a reduction in bile-metabolizing Bifidobacterium and Blautia species is associated with impaired bile acid and tryptophan metabolism, leading to gastrointestinal dysfunction and deficits in social interactions in mice model [181].

Recent research indicates that early life microbiome imbalances may have a long-lasting effect on brain development and shape neural circuits involved in behavior, emotion, and cognition. This altered brain circuitry could increase susceptibility to ASD-related symptoms, such as difficulties in social interaction and repetitive behaviors. Recent study [151] emphasizes the critical role of early life microbiome in shaping brain circuits involved in behavior and stress regulation.

Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)

Gut microbiome can also affect ADHD. Dysbiosis reduces the production of serotonin and dopamine, both important for regulating attention, mood, and behavior. Low levels of these neurotransmitters can contribute to ADHD symptoms like hyperactivity and inattention [182].

Dysbiosis also reduces SCFAs, such as butyrate, which are needed for brain health. This leads to issues with attention and cognitive function. Moreover, inflammation caused by dysbiosis can worsen ADHD symptoms. Inflammatory molecules like IL-6 and TNF-α disrupt brain areas responsible for focus and impulse control [183].

Neurodegenerative Disorders

Parkinson’s Disease (PD)

PD may start in the gut, with α-synuclein pathology originating in the ENS [184]. Early symptoms, such as constipation, can appear years before the characteristic motor symptoms of PD [185]. Gut microbiome imbalances, particularly an increase in Enterobacteriaceae and a decrease in Prevotellaceae, have been linked to the severity of PD symptoms. These microbial shifts could serve as early indicators for PD, with recent studies showing that the density of Prevotellaceae and constipation status could diagnose PD with 90.3% specificity [186]. This highlights the potential of microbiome profiling as an early diagnostic tool for PD.

Alzheimer’s Disease (AD)

The pathogenesis of AD is also believed to be closely related to the microbiome; metabolic compounds derived from the microbiome have been linked to triggering the NLRP3 inflammasome pathway, amyloid-β accumulation, and phosphorylated tau/Aβ42 AD markers [187, 188]. The accumulation of Aβ deposits subsequently triggers the release of several proinflammatory molecules, leading to neuroinflammation in the progression of AD [188]. Additionally, it has been documented that H. pylori causes the hyperphosphorylation of tau protein and the release of amyloids and inflammatory molecules [189, 190]. This suggesting that modulating the gut microbiome may offer a therapeutic strategy for combating neurodegeneration in AD [191].

Multiple Sclerosis (MS)

In MS, the gut microbiome plays a key role in immune regulation. Studies have found that Akkermansia muciniphila and Acinetobacter calcoaceticus are more common in the gut microbiome of MS patients. These bacteria can impair the function of Treg cells and increase the activity of pro-inflammatory T cells in laboratory experiments [192]. Other research has linked higher levels of Fusobacteria to an increased risk of MS relapses, suggesting that changes in the microbiome could make the disease worse [193]. Animal studies have shown that fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) from MS patients worsens symptoms in mice. Mice receiving FMT from MS patients developed more severe experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE), a model for MS, and had fewer anti-inflammatory Treg cells compared to mice receiving FMT from healthy donors. This highlights how the gut microbiome influences immune function and may contribute to MS progression [192].

Mental Health Disorders: Depression and Anxiety

Depression and anxiety are among the most thoroughly investigated mental health conditions linked to MGBA. Emerging evidence highlights the profound influence of gut microbiome on neurochemical balance, inflammation, and stress regulation, which are all central to these disorders. One major mechanism involves the depletion of beneficial bacteria such as Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus, which impairs tryptophan metabolism. Tryptophan is essential for synthesizing serotonin, a neurotransmitter crucial for mood regulation. Dysbiosis not only reduces serotonin production but also activates the kynurenine pathway, producing neurotoxic metabolites linked to depressive symptoms [45, 151]. Additionally, the reduction of SCFAs like butyrate compromises BBB integrity and promotes neuroinflammation, further exacerbating mood disorders [32, 48]. Additionally, neuroinflammation plays a critical role in both depression and anxiety. Increased levels of LPS from Gram-negative bacteria can cross the BBB and activate microglia leading to the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-6 and TNF-α. This inflammatory response contributes to the neurobiological basis of these disorders. Dysbiosis also disrupts the synthesis of GABA, an inhibitory neurotransmitter that helps counterbalance excitatory signals. Reduced GABA and elevated glutamate activity heighten anxiety and stress responses [28, 33]. Moreover, gut dysbiosis affects the HPA-axis, increasing cortisol production and perpetuating a cycle of chronic stress and inflammation [67, 194]. Similarly, disruptions in myelination processes, particularly in the PFC, further link dysbiosis to cognitive and emotional deficits observed in mood disorders. The PFC plays a central role in higher cognitive functions such as decision-making, emotional regulation, and stress response. In dysbiotic conditions, gut-derived metabolites like SCFAs, which are crucial for maintaining myelination, are reduced. This deficiency leads to impaired oligodendrocyte function and delayed myelination of the PFC, which directly impacts brain circuits responsible for emotional processing and behavioral responses to stress [176]. As a result, the altered myelination observed in dysbiosis contributes to increased vulnerability to anxiety and depression by disrupting the brain’s capacity to regulate emotional responses and cognitive functions.

Brain Tumor

The gut microbiome may influence glioma progression by altering immune responses and metabolic pathways [195]. Notable variations were found in the percentage of Firmicutes to Bacteroides, beta diversity, and the proportional prevalence of Verrcomicrobia and Akkermansia in stool samples from glioma patients and mice models compared to healthy controls [196].

All things considered, gut-modulated physiological and cellular alterations are probably exceedingly intricate and multidimensional, even if the role of the microbiome in CNS disorders is quite relevant for redesigning treatment design. Subsequent research efforts should examine the applicability of correlated observations and confirm the consistency of current experimental results. Preclinical and clinical studies for CNS disorders frequently include distracting factors like antibiotics and medications, which when combined with other variables like dietary variations and geographic location, will have a substantial impact on gut composition outside of the therapy or study model. This is another important point to keep in mind. Further investigations are necessary to determine the relationship between the gut microbiome and neurodegenerative or neurodevelopmental illnesses, as well as how CNS disorders may affect the gut microbiome's makeup. Furthermore, there is a compelling opportunity to use our expanding understanding of gut microbiome as indicative biomarkers for illnesses; nonetheless, more varied patient cohorts need to be investigated in order to confirm that microbial biomarkers are applicable to various racial and geographic backgrounds.

How to Manage?

Antibiotics

It has been demonstrated that taking antibiotics can change the makeup of gut bacteria, which can have a beneficial or bad impact on brain functions. Several studies confirmed that a negative impact was shown with increased serum levels and associated with cognitive and anxiety-like behaviors [28]. The kind and purposes of antibiotics, however, determine these unfavorable side effects. Amoxicillin and clarithromycin, for instance, decreased H. pylori load, which has a beneficial effect on brain functions in AD patients [191, 197]. In the PD rat model, the administration of non-absorbable antibiotics minimizes the death of dopaminergic neurons caused by 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA), the generation of proinflammatory mediators in the striatum, and the extent of motor impairment [198]. Additionally, the injection of rapamycin, minocycline [199, 200], and rifampicin [198, 201] decreased the microglial activity, inflammatory cytokines, and Aβ level in the AD animal model [202].

Probiotic

Probiotics are referred to as “live microorganisms that, when consumed in sufficient amounts, provide beneficial effects on the host.” Probiotics are frequently found in foods or dietary supplements that we regularly eat, such yogurt. A growing number of “designer probiotics”—which are genetically modified to optimize the advantageous properties of particular bacteria—have been released; these supplements are frequently found in more conventional pharmaceutical forms [203]. A number of studies have notably shown the positive impacts of probiotic administration of Bifidobacteria and Lactobacillus, which raises GABA levels and the expression of neurotropic factors. These effects include a decrease in the frequency of attacks of seizures in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy [204], improvement of patients’ difficulties in learning and spatial memory through the use of a fermented milk mixture [205], and a decrease in motor impairment and dopaminergic neurodegeneration in MitoPark PD mouse models [206]. Moreover, a novel probiotic formulation called SLAB51 was able to restore phenotypic abnormalities in motor activity when administered to a mouse PD-model and boost cell survival in a human in vitro PD model by lowering oxidative stress and neuronal death [207]. Of all the probiotics under investigation, the majority of research focuses on how probiotic Lactobacillus Plantarum affects a number of CNS conditions, such as major depressive disorder [208, 209], stress [210, 211], ADHD [212], and ASD [213, 214].

Thus far, the findings indicate significant promise for using beneficial gut microbes as new treatment approaches for neurological disorders. The content, stability, and legitimacy of probiotics vary greatly, and there is no agreement on the best way to take them, how long to take them, or which strains to employ. In addition, host colonization resistance raises serious questions about the utility of probiotic-based treatments in general. While the beneficial effects are not persistent because probiotics cannot inhabit in the acidic conditions of the gut for long periods [30], it may be argued that probiotics have a therapeutic advantage in that they do not permanently modify the cell environment but instead only need regular intake as needed.

Prebiotic

Prebiotics are indigestible dietary fibers that improve the health of the host by promoting the development and activity of certain gut microbiomes, particularly Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium [28, 215]. Prebiotics are mostly made up of resistant starch, fructo-oligosaccharides (FOS), and galacto-oligosaccharides (GOS), which are specifically used by gut microbes as the major source of nutrition and provide health advantages. Prebiotics, which are frequently present in fruits, vegetables, cereals, and human milk, have the benefit of influencing the gut microbiome on a broader scale. For example, a decrease in dietary fiber by the gut microbiome leads to a significant increase in immune-boosting Faecalibacterium prausnitzii and SCFA butyrate, both important for gut health. In contrast, a high-fat, low-fiber, animal-based diet reduces the number of beneficial bacteria and promotes the growth of bile-tolerant microbes [216218].

Prebiotics have been shown to enhance cognitive performance and guard against neurological conditions including PD [219, 220], AD [221], ASD [222], IBS [223], and dementia [224]. Burokas et al. demonstrated that FOS and GOS improve depression- and anxiety-like behaviors in a chronic stress mouse model by targeting the MGBA [225]. Building on this, Vijaya et al. recently reported that these prebiotics can also mitigate the detrimental effects of long-term high-fat diet consumption in aging mice, including anxiety, cognitive impairment, and microglial dysfunction [226]. In mice subjected to stress, prebiotics were able to decrease proinflammatory cytokines and corticosterone produced by chronic stress as well as boost cecal SCFAs (acetate and propionate). Likewise, prebiotic Bimuno-galacto-oligosaccharides (B-GOS) therapy improved mental performance and markedly reduced triggering of microglia and the production of CD32, CD68, SOCS3, iNOS, and IL-6 in rats [227].

In summary, the illustration (Figure 4) clarified how probiotics and prebiotics enhance brain function by regulating the microbiome and gut-brain axis.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Impact of prebiotics and probiotics on microbiome gut-brain axis improvement. Probiotics, prebiotics, or a combination of the two have been shown to ameliorate neurological problems by modifying immunological, metabolic, and neuronal pathways; lowering intestinal permeability; boosting the synthesis of SCFAs and neurochemicals; and modifying the makeup of gut microbiome (modified from [ 28 ], created with BioRender)

Synbiotic and Postbiotic

Synbiotics are a mixture of probiotics and prebiotics, in which the prebiotics serve as a reservoir of fermentable fiber to complement and improve the longevity of the probiotics [30, 228]. Postbiotics are fermentation byproducts of bacteria that include bioactive substances with beneficial properties like SCFAs and gut peptides. Postbiotics have a clear benefit over probiotics regarding longer shelf life and a safer profile; however, better-defined targets are still needed [229]. Interestingly, studies have discovered that higher-fiber diets produce more butyrate, which has neuroprotective properties and improves neuron plasticity, as well as a larger abundance of beneficial taxa and a more diverse and richer gut microbiome. Consequently, nutrition has a big impact on how CNS illnesses turn out. For instance, in a study involving PD mice, the experimental group experienced a markedly lower loss of dopaminergic neurons and a deterioration in motor function than the control group [230]. Furthermore, it has been discovered that high-fat, low-carb, and sufficient protein ketogenic diets can decrease the frequency of seizures in epilepsy patients by raising GABA and glutamate levels [231]. It is interesting to note that these findings apply to a variety of illnesses, including gliomas. For instance, in the gliomas animal model, treated with a glutamine antagonist, 6-diazo-5-oxo-l-norleucine, and a calorically restricted ketogenic diet concurrently showed massive death of tumor cells with no apparent toxicity [232]. According to a systematic study, probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics are effective treatment approaches for enhancing cognitive abilities, behavioral symptoms as well as psychological symptoms in dementia patients [224]. Many clinical investigations are presently being carried out to better examine the impact of prebiotics and synbiotics in various neurological illnesses in order to transition from lab to clinic. For instance, the impact of GOS on cortical stimulation and plasticity, anxiety regulations, and thought control capability is being examined in a significant ongoing longitudinal investigation named “The Role of the Microbiota-gut-brain Axis in Brain Development and Mental Health.” Moreover, a phase III clinical trial is currently being conducted on a different research, named “Mediterranean-DASH Diet Intervention for Neurodegenerative Delay,” to examine the impact of a hybrid diet on the cognitive decline of older, overweight people who had inadequate nutritional intake in the past [31].

There is undoubtedly growing interest in the advantages that healthy diets provide for CNS therapy interventions and consequences, despite the difficulty in precisely targeting particular gut microbes and the demand for an effective discovery of how commensal bacterial populations’ initial states may affect the efficacy of dietary mediations.

Fecal Microbiota Transplantation (FMT)

FMT has been demonstrated to halt the course of seizures [233] and MS [234] for a considerable amount of time and to temporarily lessen PD symptoms (such as neuroinflammation and leg tremors) [235, 236]. Additionally, improved spatial learning and memory were demonstrated by the transplantation of feces from senescence-resistant mice into models of AD animals [237]. Given its capacity to transmit both immune-regulatory and disease-promoting bacteria, FMT is currently surrounded by confusion due to unclear classifications of a favorable microbiome and the need to confirm its advantages and long-term impacts. New research looked at FMT and how it affected mice with depression. When compared to the control group, mice who receive fecal microbiota from chronic unpredictable mild stress (CUMS) mice exhibited higher levels of depression and anxiety-like behaviors. Furthermore, increased amounts of TNF-α, IFN-γ, and indoleamine 2,3 dioxygenase 1 (IDO1) were detected in the recipient mice’s hippocampal regions. This suggests that the gut microbiome influences the inflammatory response in the hippocampal regions by disrupting the microbiome-gut-brain axis, which in turn intensifies symptoms of anxiety and depression [238]. Moreover, FMT-treated MS patients had improved disease progression and symptoms [234, 239]. In a study demonstrating the effect of FTM from AD patients to GF mice found that mice behavior was affected by this transplantation but some metabolites such as taurine, valine, and γ-aminobutyrate much less prevalent in the stool of mice that received a microbiota transplant from the diseased patient [240]. In a reported case report, the gastrointestinal problems and tremors in the legs of the 71-year-old PD patient improved after receiving FMT from young, healthy donors [235].

Finally, FMT’s lack of specificity outweighs its great potential to positively alter the gut microbiome composition of unhealthy individuals. It is unclear at this point whether FMT will be enough as a stand-alone treatment; this answer will probably rely on the nature of the disease and the microbes that affect it.

Therapeutic Approaches and Challenges

While probiotics, prebiotics, and FMT show promise in modulating the MGBA and improving mental health outcomes, several significant challenges limit their clinical application and effectiveness.

Variability in Microbiome Composition

The gut microbiome is highly individualized, shaped by genetics, diet, environment, and lifestyle. This variability complicates the development of standardized treatments, as the same probiotic or prebiotic treatment may not yield consistent results across different individuals. For instance, a probiotic strain that proves effective in one person may have no impact on another due to differences in their microbiome composition. Personalized approaches, considering the individual’s unique microbiome, are critical for enhancing treatment outcomes. Recent studies [194] emphasize that the baseline microbiome composition significantly affects the efficacy of interventions, underscoring the need for tailored treatments.

Standardization and Efficacy

Current probiotic and prebiotic formulations vary widely in strain composition, dosage, and viability. This lack of standardization leads to inconsistent clinical results, making it difficult to determine the optimal dose, duration, and specific strains needed to effectively modulate the MGBA. To improve reliability and clinical applicability, rigorous clinical trials must be conducted to establish clear guidelines for formulation, dosage, and treatment protocols. Furthermore, while some studies show promise for probiotics in conditions like depression and anxiety, results have been inconsistent, highlighting the need for more controlled, large-scale trials.

Ethical and Practical Considerations in FMT

There are several ethical and safety concerns remaining upon using FTM. Ethical issues related to donor selection and the risk of pathogen transmission have yet to be fully addressed [241, 242]. The long-term effects of FMT on the recipient’s microbiome and overall health are still unclear, making it crucial to develop standardized safety protocols for donor screening and post-treatment monitoring [236]. Furthermore, the lack of consensus on optimal treatment protocols, including the preparation, storage, and administration of fecal transplants, complicates its widespread clinical use. While FMT offers significant promise in restoring microbial balance, its effectiveness remains highly dependent on both the recipient’s microbiota composition and the specific microbial strains used in the transplant [236].

Research Gaps and Future Directions

Although the MGBA is increasingly recognized as a potential therapeutic target, more research is needed to address the gaps in our understanding of its role in mental health. Much of the existing literature relies on animal models, which may not accurately reflect human physiology. Additionally, the long-term effects of dietary interventions, prebiotics, and probiotics on gut microbiome stability and overall health are still under investigation. To better harness the therapeutic potential of microbiome-based treatments, personalized medicine approaches should be prioritized, integrating microbiome profiling and other biomarkers to tailor interventions to individual patients.

Conclusion

The gut and brain are connected in a complex bidirectional pathway called gut-brain axis. Growing findings on the impact of intestinal inflammation on the neurological system are crucial for connecting the missed dots between the two regions and further understanding the MGBA’s synergistic connection. This review discusses the reported connections and pathways that are involved in MGBA focusing on the important role of gut microbiome and their metabolites. Subsequently, it centralizes the attention toward the critical roles of the gut microbiome in brain development in early life and throughout the course of life and how microbiome dysbiosis affects MGBA and influences neurological diseases. Finally, sheds light on how to manage this disease’s conditions through the rebalance of the gut microbiome.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Yasmin N. Ramadan, Saleh F. Alqifari, Khaled Alshehri, Amirah Alhowiti, Hyder Mirghani, Tariq Alrasheed, Faisal Aljohani, Abdulaziz Alghamdi, Helal F Hetta; writing—original draft preparation, Yasmin N. Ramadan, Saleh F. Alqifari, Khaled Alshehri, Amirah Alhowiti, Hyder Mirghani, Tariq Alrasheed, Faisal Aljohani, Abdulaziz Alghamdi, Helal F Hetta; writing—review and editing, Yasmin N. Ramadan, Saleh F. Alqifari, Khaled Alshehri, Amirah Alhowiti, Hyder Mirghani, Tariq Alrasheed, Faisal Aljohani, Abdulaziz Alghamdi, Helal F Hetta. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Open access funding provided by The Science, Technology & Innovation Funding Authority (STDF) in cooperation with The Egyptian Knowledge Bank (EKB).

Data Availability

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

Declarations

Consent for Publication

Not applicable.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate

Not applicable.

Footnotes

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Dinan TG, Cryan JF (2016) Mood by microbe: towards clinical translation. Genome Med 8(1):36 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Drossman DA (2016) Functional gastrointestinal disorders: history, pathophysiology, clinical features, and Rome IV. Gastroenterology 150(6):1262-1279.e2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Mayer EA (2011) Gut feelings: the emerging biology of gut-brain communication. Nat Rev Neurosci 12(8):453–466 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Margolis KG, Cryan JF, Mayer EA (2021) The microbiota-gut-brain axis: from motility to mood. Gastroenterology 160(5):1486–1501 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Clarke G et al (2013) The microbiome-gut-brain axis during early life regulates the hippocampal serotonergic system in a sex-dependent manner. Mol Psychiatry 18(6):666–673 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Sommer F, Bäckhed F (2013) The gut microbiota—masters of host development and physiology. Nat Rev Microbiol 11(4):227–238 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Structure function and diversity of the healthy human microbiome. Nature (2012), 486(7402), p 207–214 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 8.Ramadan YN et al (2024) MicroRNA signatures in the pathogenesis and therapy of inflammatory bowel disease. Clin Exp Med 24(1):217 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Elsherbiny NM et al (2020) Autoimmune hepatitis: shifts in gut microbiota and metabolic pathways among Egyptian patients. Microorganisms 8(7):1011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hetta HF, AR, Ramadan YN, Fathy H, Khorshid M, Mabrouk MM, Hashem M (2024) Gut virome: new key players in the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease. World J Methodol 15(2), p 92592 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 11.Collado MC et al (2016) Human gut colonisation may be initiated in utero by distinct microbial communities in the placenta and amniotic fluid. Sci Rep 6:23129 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Koenig JE et al (2011) Succession of microbial consortia in the developing infant gut microbiome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 108 Suppl 1 (Suppl 1), p 4578–85 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 13.Gensollen T et al (2016) How colonization by microbiota in early life shapes the immune system. Science 352(6285):539–544 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Bäckhed F et al (2015) Dynamics and stabilization of the human gut microbiome during the first year of life. Cell Host Microbe 17(5):690–703 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Elsherbiny NM et al (2022) Impact of geographical location on the gut microbiota profile in Egyptian children with type 1 diabetes mellitus: a pilot study. International Journal of General Medicine, p 6173–6187 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 16.Neuman H et al (2018) Antibiotics in early life: dysbiosis and the damage done. FEMS Microbiol Rev 42(4):489–499 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Li W et al (2021) Maternal immune activation alters adult behavior, intestinal integrity, gut microbiota and the gut inflammation. Brain Behav 11(5):e02133 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Lu J, Claud EC (2019) Connection between gut microbiome and brain development in preterm infants. Dev Psychobiol 61(5):739–751 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Munawar N et al (2021) Hidden role of gut microbiome dysbiosis in schizophrenia: antipsychotics or psychobiotics as therapeutics? Int J Mol Sci 22(14) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 20.Han VX et al (2021) Maternal immune activation and neuroinflammation in human neurodevelopmental disorders. Nat Rev Neurol 17(9):564–579 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Garay PA, McAllister AK (2010) Novel roles for immune molecules in neural development: implications for neurodevelopmental disorders. Front Synaptic Neurosci 2:136 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Sotgiu S et al (2020) Immune regulation of neurodevelopment at the mother–foetus interface: the case of autism. Clinical & Translational Immunology 9(11):e1211 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Heiss CN, Olofsson LE (2019) The role of the gut microbiota in development, function and disorders of the central nervous system and the enteric nervous system. J Neuroendocrinol 31(5):e12684 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Furness JB (2012) The enteric nervous system and neurogastroenterology. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 9(5):286–294 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Wehrwein EA, Orer HS, Barman SM (2016) Overview of the anatomy, physiology, and pharmacology of the autonomic nervous system. Compr Physiol 6(3):1239–1278 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Rhee SH, Pothoulakis C, Mayer EA (2009) Principles and clinical implications of the brain-gut-enteric microbiota axis. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 6(5):306–314 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Alonso C, et al (2008) Maladaptive intestinal epithelial responses to life stress may predispose healthy women to gut mucosal inflammation. Gastroenterology 135(1), p 163–172. e1 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 28.Suganya K, Koo B-S (2020) Gut–brain axis: role of gut microbiota on neurological disorders and how probiotics/prebiotics beneficially modulate microbial and immune pathways to improve brain functions. Int J Mol Sci 21(20):7551 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Mart’yanov SV, et al (2021) The impact of norepinephrine on mono-species and dual-species Staphylococcal biofilms. Microorganisms 9(4) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 30.Long-Smith C et al (2020) Microbiota-gut-brain axis: new therapeutic opportunities. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 60:477–502 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Liu L, Huh JR, Shah K (2022) Microbiota and the gut-brain-axis: implications for new therapeutic design in the CNS. eBioMedicine 77 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 32.Braniste V et al (2014) The gut microbiota influences blood-brain barrier permeability in mice. Sci Transl Med 6(263), p 263ra158 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 33.Johnson KVA, Foster KR (2018) Why does the microbiome affect behaviour? Nat Rev Microbiol 16(10):647–655 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Fülling C, Dinan TG, Cryan JF (2019) Gut microbe to brain signaling: what happens in vagus…. Neuron 101(6):998–1002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Johansson ME et al (2015) Normalization of host intestinal mucus layers requires long-term microbial colonization. Cell Host Microbe 18(5):582–592 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Spiljar M, Merkler D, Trajkovski M (2017) The immune system bridges the gut microbiota with systemic energy homeostasis: Focus on TLRs, Mucosal Barrier, and SCFAs. Front Immunol 8:1353 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Bachmann C, Colombo JP, Berüter J (1979) Short chain fatty acids in plasma and brain: quantitative determination by gas chromatography. Clin Chim Acta 92(2):153–159 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Nøhr MK et al (2013) GPR41/FFAR3 and GPR43/FFAR2 as cosensors for short-chain fatty acids in enteroendocrine cells vs FFAR3 in enteric neurons and FFAR2 in enteric leukocytes. Endocrinology 154(10):3552–3564 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Frost G et al (2014) The short-chain fatty acid acetate reduces appetite via a central homeostatic mechanism. Nat Commun 5:3611 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Perry RJ et al (2016) Acetate mediates a microbiome-brain-β-cell axis to promote metabolic syndrome. Nature 534(7606):213–217 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Cervantes-Barragan L et al (2017) Lactobacillus reuteri induces gut intraepithelial CD4(+)CD8αα(+) T cells. Science 357(6353):806–810 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Sonner JK et al (2019) Dietary tryptophan links encephalogenicity of autoreactive T cells with gut microbial ecology. Nat Commun 10(1):4877 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Lehnardt S et al (2002) The toll-like receptor TLR4 is necessary for lipopolysaccharide-induced oligodendrocyte injury in the CNS. J Neurosci 22(7):2478–2486 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Patlola SR, Donohoe G, McKernan DP (2023) Counting the toll of inflammation on schizophrenia-a potential role for toll-like receptors. Biomolecules 13(8) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 45.Zhao J et al (2019) Neuroinflammation induced by lipopolysaccharide causes cognitive impairment in mice. Sci Rep 9(1):5790 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Wang Y et al (2014) An intestinal commensal symbiosis factor controls neuroinflammation via TLR2-mediated CD39 signalling. Nat Commun 5:4432 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Liu J et al (2017) Sodium butyrate exerts protective effect against Parkinson’s disease in mice via stimulation of glucagon like peptide-1. J Neurol Sci 381:176–181 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Ho L et al (2018) Protective roles of intestinal microbiota derived short chain fatty acids in Alzheimer’s disease-type beta-amyloid neuropathological mechanisms. Expert Rev Neurother 18(1):83–90 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Yadav SK, Ito K, Dhib-Jalbu S (2023) Interaction of the gut microbiome and immunity in multiple sclerosis: impact of diet and immune therapy. Int J Mol Sci 24(19) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 50.Chevalier AC, Rosenberger TA (2017) Increasing acetyl-CoA metabolism attenuates injury and alters spinal cord lipid content in mice subjected to experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J Neurochem 141(5):721–737 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Kratsman N, Getselter D, Elliott E (2016) Sodium butyrate attenuates social behavior deficits and modifies the transcription of inhibitory/excitatory genes in the frontal cortex of an autism model. Neuropharmacology 102:136–145 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Jenkins TA et al (2016) Influence of tryptophan and serotonin on mood and cognition with a possible role of the gut-brain axis. Nutrients 8(1) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 53.Dürk T et al (2005) 5-Hydroxytryptamine modulates cytokine and chemokine production in LPS-primed human monocytes via stimulation of different 5-HTR subtypes. Int Immunol 17(5):599–606 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Smith TK, Park KJ, Hennig GW (2014) Colonic migrating motor complexes, high amplitude propagating contractions, neural reflexes and the importance of neuronal and mucosal serotonin. J Neurogastroenterol Motil 20(4):423–446 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Bogunovic M et al (2007) Enteroendocrine cells express functional Toll-like receptors. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 292(6):G1770–G1783 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Tolhurst G et al (2012) Short-chain fatty acids stimulate glucagon-like peptide-1 secretion via the G-protein-coupled receptor FFAR2. Diabetes 61(2):364–371 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Le Guennec L et al (2020) Strategies used by bacterial pathogens to cross the blood-brain barrier. Cell Microbiol 22(1):e13132 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Coureuil M et al (2017) A journey into the brain: insight into how bacterial pathogens cross blood-brain barriers. Nat Rev Microbiol 15(3):149–159 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Acuña I et al (2021) Infant gut microbiota associated with fine motor skills. Nutrients 13(5) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 60.Jena A et al (2020) Gut-brain axis in the early postnatal years of life: a developmental perspective. Front Integr Neurosci 14:44 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Borre YE et al (2014) Microbiota and neurodevelopmental windows: implications for brain disorders. Trends Mol Med 20(9):509–518 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Cerdó T, Diéguez E, Campoy C (2020) Impact of gut microbiota on neurogenesis and neurological diseases during infancy. Curr Opin Pharmacol 50:33–37 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Hoban AE et al (2016) Regulation of prefrontal cortex myelination by the microbiota. Transl Psychiatry 6(4):e774 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Duncan ID, Watters JJ (2019) Remyelination and the gut-brain axis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 116(50):24922–24924 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Parker A, Fonseca S, Carding SR (2020) Gut microbes and metabolites as modulators of blood-brain barrier integrity and brain health. Gut Microbes 11(2):135–157 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Erny D et al (2015) Host microbiota constantly control maturation and function of microglia in the CNS. Nat Neurosci 18(7):965–977 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Sudo N (2012) Role of microbiome in regulating the HPA axis and its relevance to allergy. Chem Immunol Allergy 98:163–175 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Prado EL, Dewey KG (2014) Nutrition and brain development in early life. Nutr Rev 72(4):267–284 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Ratsika A et al (2021) Priming for life: early life nutrition and the microbiota-gut-brain axis. Nutrients 13(2) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 70.Vangay P et al (2015) Antibiotics, pediatric dysbiosis, and disease. Cell Host Microbe 17(5):553–564 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Cosacak MI, Bhattarai P, Kizil C (2020) Alzheimer’s disease, neural stem cells and neurogenesis: cellular phase at single-cell level. Neural Regen Res 15(5):824–827 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Kempermann G (2019) Environmental enrichment, new neurons and the neurobiology of individuality. Nat Rev Neurosci 20(4):235–245 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Sarubbo F, Cavallucci V, Pani G (2022) The influence of gut microbiota on neurogenesis: evidence and hopes. Cells 11(3) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 74.Salvo E et al (2020) A murine model of pediatric inflammatory bowel disease causes microbiota-gut-brain axis deficits in adulthood. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 319(3):G361-g374 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Pessa-Morikawa T et al (2022) Maternal microbiota-derived metabolic profile in fetal murine intestine, brain and placenta. BMC Microbiol 22(1):46 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Kaul D et al (2012) Expression of Toll-like receptors in the developing brain. PLoS ONE 7(5):e37767 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Humann J et al (2016) Bacterial peptidoglycan traverses the placenta to induce fetal neuroproliferation and aberrant postnatal behavior. Cell Host Microbe 19(3):388–399 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Williams S et al (2016) Neonatal prebiotic (BGOS) supplementation increases the levels of synaptophysin, GluN2A-subunits and BDNF proteins in the adult rat hippocampus. Synapse 70(3):121–124 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Sentürk A et al (2011) Ephrin Bs are essential components of the Reelin pathway to regulate neuronal migration. Nature 472(7343):356–360 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.D’Arcangelo G (2014) Reelin in the years: controlling neuronal migration and maturation in the mammalian brain. Advances in neuroscience 2014
  • 81.Allam-Ndoul B, Castonguay-Paradis S, Veilleux A (2020) Gut microbiota and intestinal trans-epithelial permeability. Int J Mol Sci 21(17) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 82.Perez-Favila A et al (2019) Current therapeutic strategies in diabetic foot ulcers. Medicina (Kaunas) 55(11) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 83.Ogbonnaya ES et al (2015) Adult hippocampal neurogenesis is regulated by the microbiome. Biol Psychiatry 78(4):e7-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Alenina N, Klempin F (2015) The role of serotonin in adult hippocampal neurogenesis. Behav Brain Res 277:49–57 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Lebel C et al (2012) Diffusion tensor imaging of white matter tract evolution over the lifespan. Neuroimage 60(1):340–352 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Williamson JM, Lyons DA (2018) Myelin dynamics throughout life: an ever-changing landscape? Front Cell Neurosci 12:424 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Benes FM (1989) Myelination of cortical-hippocampal relays during late adolescence. Schizophr Bull 15(4):585–593 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Almeida RG, Lyons DA (2017) On myelinated axon plasticity and neuronal circuit formation and function. J Neurosci 37(42):10023–10034 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Kaller MS et al (2017) Myelin plasticity and behaviour-connecting the dots. Curr Opin Neurobiol 47:86–92 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Ntranos A, Casaccia P (2018) The microbiome-gut-behavior axis: crosstalk between the gut microbiome and oligodendrocytes modulates behavioral responses. Neurotherapeutics 15(1):31–35 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Gacias M et al (2016) Microbiota-driven transcriptional changes in prefrontal cortex override genetic differences in social behavior. Elife 5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 92.van de Wouw M et al (2018) Short-chain fatty acids: microbial metabolites that alleviate stress-induced brain-gut axis alterations. J Physiol 596(20):4923–4944 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Keogh CE et al (2021) Myelin as a regulator of development of the microbiota-gut-brain axis. Brain Behav Immun 91:437–450 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Obermeier B, Daneman R, Ransohoff RM (2013) Development, maintenance and disruption of the blood-brain barrier. Nat Med 19(12):1584–1596 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Michel L, Prat A (2016) One more role for the gut: microbiota and blood brain barrier. Ann Transl Med 4(1):15 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Dash S, Syed YA, Khan MR (2022) Understanding the role of the gut microbiome in brain development and its association with neurodevelopmental psychiatric disorders. Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology 10:880544 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Lawson LJ et al (1990) Heterogeneity in the distribution and morphology of microglia in the normal adult mouse brain. Neuroscience 39(1):151–170 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Perry VH (1998) A revised view of the central nervous system microenvironment and major histocompatibility complex class II antigen presentation. J Neuroimmunol 90(2):113–121 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Ginhoux F et al (2013) Origin and differentiation of microglia. Front Cell Neurosci 7:45 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Daneman R (2012) The blood-brain barrier in health and disease. Ann Neurol 72(5):648–672 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Saijo K, Glass CK (2011) Microglial cell origin and phenotypes in health and disease. Nat Rev Immunol 11(11):775–787 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Nair AL et al (2023) Human BBB-on-a-chip reveals barrier disruption, endothelial inflammation, and T cell migration under neuroinflammatory conditions. Front Mol Neurosci 16:1250123 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Kettenmann H et al (2011) Physiology of microglia. Physiol Rev 91(2):461–553 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Verkhratsky A, Sun D, Tanaka J (2021) Snapshot of microglial physiological functions. Neurochem Int 144:104960 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Perry VH, Nicoll JA, Holmes C (2010) Microglia in neurodegenerative disease. Nat Rev Neurol 6(4):193–201 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Perry VH, Teeling J (2013) Microglia and macrophages of the central nervous system: the contribution of microglia priming and systemic inflammation to chronic neurodegeneration. Semin Immunopathol 35(5):601–612 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Abdel-Haq R et al (2019) Microbiome-microglia connections via the gut-brain axis. J Exp Med 216(1):41–59 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Wang Y et al (2018) The gut-microglia connection: implications for central nervous system diseases. Front Immunol 9:2325 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Mosher KI, Wyss-Coray T (2015) Go with your gut: microbiota meet microglia. Nat Neurosci 18(7):930–931 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Hanamsagar R et al (2017) Generation of a microglial developmental index in mice and in humans reveals a sex difference in maturation and immune reactivity. Glia 65(9):1504–1520 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Han J et al (2019) Enforced microglial depletion and repopulation as a promising strategy for the treatment of neurological disorders. Glia 67(2):217–231 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Smith SM, Vale WW (2006) The role of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis in neuroendocrine responses to stress. Dialogues Clin Neurosci 8(4):383–395 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Sudo N et al (2004) Postnatal microbial colonization programs the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal system for stress response in mice. J Physiol 558(Pt 1):263–275 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Partrick KA et al (2021) Ingestion of probiotic (Lactobacillus helveticus and Bifidobacterium longum) alters intestinal microbial structure and behavioral expression following social defeat stress. Sci Rep 11(1):3763 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Dash S, Syed YA, Khan MR (2022) Understanding the role of the gut microbiome in brain development and its association with neurodevelopmental psychiatric disorders. Front Cell Dev Biol 10:880544 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Costello EK et al (2009) Bacterial community variation in human body habitats across space and time. Science 326(5960):1694–1697 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Claesson MJ et al (2012) Gut microbiota composition correlates with diet and health in the elderly. Nature 488(7410):178–184 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Salazar N et al (2014) The human intestinal microbiome at extreme ages of life. Dietary intervention as a way to counteract alterations. Front Genet 5, p 406 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 119.Yatsunenko T et al (2012) Human gut microbiome viewed across age and geography. Nature 486(7402):222–227 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Aagaard K et al (2014) The placenta harbors a unique microbiome. Sci Transl Med 6(237), p 237ra65–237ra65 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 121.Jiménez E et al (2008) Is meconium from healthy newborns actually sterile? Res Microbiol 159(3):187–193 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Lauder AP et al (2016) Comparison of placenta samples with contamination controls does not provide evidence for a distinct placenta microbiota. Microbiome 4(1):29 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Lim ES, Rodriguez C, Holtz LR (2018) Amniotic fluid from healthy term pregnancies does not harbor a detectable microbial community. Microbiome 6(1):87 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Perez-Muñoz ME et al (2017) A critical assessment of the “sterile womb” and “in utero colonization” hypotheses: implications for research on the pioneer infant microbiome. Microbiome 5(1):48 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Milani C et al (2017) The first microbial colonizers of the human gut: composition, activities, and health implications of the infant gut microbiota. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 81(4) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 126.Martínez I et al (2018) Experimental evaluation of the importance of colonization history in early-life gut microbiota assembly. Elife 7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 127.Bokulich NA et al (2016) Antibiotics, birth mode, and diet shape microbiome maturation during early life. Sci Transl Med 8(343), p 343ra82–343ra82 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 128.Chu DM et al (2017) Maturation of the infant microbiome community structure and function across multiple body sites and in relation to mode of delivery. Nat Med 23(3):314–326 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Yassour M et al (2016) Natural history of the infant gut microbiome and impact of antibiotic treatment on bacterial strain diversity and stability. Sci Transl Med 8(343), p 343ra81 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 130.Palmer C et al (2007) Development of the human infant intestinal microbiota. PLoS Biol 5(7):e177 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Hollister EB et al (2015) Structure and function of the healthy pre-adolescent pediatric gut microbiome. Microbiome 3:36 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Luczynski P et al (2016) Growing up in a bubble: using germ-free animals to assess the influence of the gut microbiota on brain and behavior. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 19(8) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 133.Buffington SA et al (2016) Microbial reconstitution reverses maternal diet-induced social and synaptic deficits in offspring. Cell 165(7):1762–1775 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Galley JD et al (2014) Maternal obesity is associated with alterations in the gut microbiome in toddlers. PLoS ONE 9(11):e113026 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Hsiao EY et al (2013) Microbiota modulate behavioral and physiological abnormalities associated with neurodevelopmental disorders. Cell 155(7):1451–1463 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Jašarević E et al (2017) Stress during pregnancy alters temporal and spatial dynamics of the maternal and offspring microbiome in a sex-specific manner. Sci Rep 7:44182 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Zijlmans MA et al (2015) Maternal prenatal stress is associated with the infant intestinal microbiota. Psychoneuroendocrinology 53:233–245 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Sugino KY, Paneth N, Comstock SS (2019) Michigan cohorts to determine associations of maternal pre-pregnancy body mass index with pregnancy and infant gastrointestinal microbial communities: Late pregnancy and early infancy. PLoS ONE 14(3):e0213733 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Sjögren YM et al (2009) Influence of early gut microbiota on the maturation of childhood mucosal and systemic immune responses. Clin Exp Allergy 39(12):1842–1851 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Dong P, Yang Y, Wang WP (2010) The role of intestinal bifidobacteria on immune system development in young rats. Early Hum Dev 86(1):51–58 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Azad MB et al (2014) Infant antibiotic exposure and the development of childhood overweight and central adiposity. Int J Obes (Lond) 38(10):1290–1298 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Abrahamsson TR et al (2014) Low gut microbiota diversity in early infancy precedes asthma at school age. Clin Exp Allergy 44(6):842–850 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Indrio F et al (2014) Prophylactic use of a probiotic in the prevention of colic, regurgitation, and functional constipation: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Pediatr 168(3):228–233 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Dong M et al (2023) Effect of probiotics intake on constipation in children: an umbrella review. Front Nutr 10:1218909> [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145.Weizman Z, Asli G, Alsheikh A (2005) Effect of a probiotic infant formula on infections in child care centers: comparison of two probiotic agents. Pediatrics 115(1):5–9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146.Panigrahi P et al (2017) A randomized synbiotic trial to prevent sepsis among infants in rural India. Nature 548(7668):407–412 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147.Zhang Z, Cheng L, Ning D (2023) Gut microbiota and sepsis: bidirectional Mendelian study and mediation analysis. Front Immunol 14:1234924 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148.Lin X et al (2023) Relationship between gut microbiota dysbiosis and immune indicator in children with sepsis. BMC Pediatr 23(1):516 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149.Pärtty A et al (2015) A possible link between early probiotic intervention and the risk of neuropsychiatric disorders later in childhood: a randomized trial. Pediatr Res 77(6):823–828 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150.Parracho HM et al (2010) A double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover-designed probiotic feeding study in children diagnosed with autistic spectrum disorders. International Journal of Probiotics & Prebiotics 5(2):69 [Google Scholar]
  • 151.Ratsika A et al (2024) Maternal high-fat diet-induced microbiota changes are associated with alterations in embryonic brain metabolites and adolescent behaviour. Brain Behav Immun 121:317–330 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152.Lynch CMK et al (2023) Critical windows of early-life microbiota disruption on behaviour, neuroimmune function, and neurodevelopment. Brain Behav Immun 108:309–327 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153.Ranhotra HS (2023) Discrete interplay of gut microbiota L-tryptophan metabolites in host biology and disease. Mol Cell Biochem [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 154.Sajdel-Sulkowska EM (2023) The impact of maternal gut microbiota during pregnancy on fetal gut-brain axis development and life-long health outcomes. Microorganisms 11(9) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 155.Diaz Heijtz R et al (2011) Normal gut microbiota modulates brain development and behavior. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108(7):3047–3052 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156.Leclercq S et al (2017) Low-dose penicillin in early life induces long-term changes in murine gut microbiota, brain cytokines and behavior. Nat Commun 8:15062 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 157.Li S et al (2023) The gut microbiome: an important role in neurodegenerative diseases and their therapeutic advances. Mol Cell Biochem [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 158.Hayer SS, Hwang S, Clayton JB (2023) Antibiotic-induced gut dysbiosis and cognitive, emotional, and behavioral changes in rodents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Neurosci 17:1237177 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 159.Stilling RM et al (2015) Microbes & neurodevelopment–absence of microbiota during early life increases activity-related transcriptional pathways in the amygdala. Brain Behav Immun 50:209–220 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 160.Anand N, Gorantla VR, Chidambaram SB (2022) The role of gut dysbiosis in the pathophysiology of neuropsychiatric disorders. Cells 12(1) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 161.Blakemore SJ (2012) Imaging brain development: the adolescent brain. Neuroimage 61(2):397–406 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 162.Casey BJ, Jones RM, Hare TA (2008) The adolescent brain. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1124:111–126 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 163.Blakemore SJ, Choudhury S (2006) Development of the adolescent brain: implications for executive function and social cognition. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 47(3–4):296–312 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 164.Spear LP (2000) The adolescent brain and age-related behavioral manifestations. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 24(4):417–463 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 165.Paus T, Keshavan M, Giedd JN (2008) Why do many psychiatric disorders emerge during adolescence? Nat Rev Neurosci 9(12):947–957 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 166.Miguel-Hidalgo JJ (2013) Brain structural and functional changes in adolescents with psychiatric disorders. Int J Adolesc Med Health 25(3):245–256 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 167.Lee FS et al (2014) Mental health. Adolescent mental health--opportunity and obligation. Science 346(6209), p 547–9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 168.Hopkins MJ, Sharp R, Macfarlane GT (2001) Age and disease related changes in intestinal bacterial populations assessed by cell culture, 16S rRNA abundance, and community cellular fatty acid profiles. Gut 48(2):198–205 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 169.Markle JG et al (2013) Sex differences in the gut microbiome drive hormone-dependent regulation of autoimmunity. Science 339(6123):1084–1088 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 170.Cowan CSM, Richardson R (2019) Early-life stress leads to sex-dependent changes in pubertal timing in rats that are reversed by a probiotic formulation. Dev Psychobiol 61(5):679–687 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 171.Desbonnet L et al (2015) Gut microbiota depletion from early adolescence in mice: implications for brain and behaviour. Brain Behav Immun 48:165–173 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 172.Walden KE et al (2023) A randomized controlled trial to examine the impact of a multi-strain probiotic on self-reported indicators of depression, anxiety, mood, and associated biomarkers. Front Nutr 10:1219313 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 173.Kustrimovic N et al (2024) Gut microbiota and immune system dynamics in Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s diseases. Int J Mol Sci 25(22):12164 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 174.Ginsberg SD, Blaser MJ (2024) Alzheimer’s disease has its origins in early life via a perturbed microbiome. The Journal of Infectious Diseases 230 (Supplement_2), p S141-S149 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 175.Caradonna E et al (2024) The brain–gut axis, an important player in Alzheimer and Parkinson disease: a narrative review. J Clin Med 13(14):4130 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 176.Laudani S et al (2023) Gut microbiota alterations promote traumatic stress susceptibility associated with p-cresol-induced dopaminergic dysfunctions. Brain Behav Immun 107:385–396 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 177.Ma Q et al (2019) Impact of microbiota on central nervous system and neurological diseases: the gut-brain axis. J Neuroinflammation 16(1):53 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 178.Rutsch A, Kantsjö JB, Ronchi F (2020) The gut-brain axis: how microbiota and host inflammasome influence brain physiology and pathology. Frontiers in Immunology 11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 179.Morais LH, Schreiber HLt, Mazmanian SK (2021) The gut microbiota-brain axis in behaviour and brain disorders. Nat Rev Microbiol 19(4), p 241–255 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 180.Strati F et al (2017) New evidences on the altered gut microbiota in autism spectrum disorders. Microbiome 5(1):24 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 181.Golubeva AV et al (2017) Microbiota-related changes in bile acid & tryptophan metabolism are associated with gastrointestinal dysfunction in a mouse model of autism. EBioMedicine 24:166–178 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 182.Cickovski T et al (2023) Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and the gut microbiome: an ecological perspective. PLoS ONE 18(8):e0273890 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 183.Bull-Larsen S, Mohajeri MH (2019) The potential influence of the bacterial microbiome on the development and progression of ADHD. Nutrients 11(11) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 184.Braak H et al (2006) Gastric alpha-synuclein immunoreactive inclusions in Meissner’s and Auerbach’s plexuses in cases staged for Parkinson’s disease-related brain pathology. Neurosci Lett 396(1):67–72 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 185.Cersosimo MG, Benarroch EE (2012) Pathological correlates of gastrointestinal dysfunction in Parkinson’s disease. Neurobiol Dis 46(3):559–564 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 186.Scheperjans F et al (2015) Gut microbiota are related to Parkinson’s disease and clinical phenotype. Mov Disord 30(3):350–358 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 187.Shukla PK et al (2021) Alterations in the gut-microbial-inflammasome-brain axis in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Cells 10(4) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 188.Honarpisheh P et al (2020) Dysregulated gut homeostasis observed prior to the accumulation of the brain amyloid-β in Tg2576 mice. Int J Mol Sci 21(5) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 189.Wang XL et al (2015) Helicobacter pylori filtrate induces Alzheimer-like tau hyperphosphorylation by activating glycogen synthase kinase-3β. J Alzheimers Dis 43(1):153–165 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 190.Noori M et al (2023) Helicobacter pylori infection contributes to the expression of Alzheimer’s disease-associated risk factors and neuroinflammation. Heliyon 9(9):e19607 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 191.Kountouras J et al (2009) Eradication of Helicobacter pylori may be beneficial in the management of Alzheimer’s disease. J Neurol 256(5):758–767 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 192.Cekanaviciute E et al (2017) Gut bacteria from multiple sclerosis patients modulate human T cells and exacerbate symptoms in mouse models. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 114(40):10713–10718 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 193.Tremlett H et al (2016) Gut microbiota composition and relapse risk in pediatric MS: A pilot study. J Neurol Sci 363:153–157 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 194.Tofani GSS et al (2024) Gut microbiota regulates stress responsivity via the circadian system. Cell Metab [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 195.Wang F et al (2014) Helicobacter pylori-induced gastric inflammation and gastric cancer. Cancer Lett 345(2):196–202 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 196.Patrizz A et al (2020) Glioma and temozolomide induced alterations in gut microbiome. Sci Rep 10(1):21002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 197.Catumbela CSG et al (2023) Clinical evidence of human pathogens implicated in Alzheimer’s disease pathology and the therapeutic efficacy of antimicrobials: an overview. Transl Neurodegener 12(1):37 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 198.Koutzoumis DN et al (2020) Alterations of the gut microbiota with antibiotics protects dopamine neuron loss and improve motor deficits in a pharmacological rodent model of Parkinson’s disease. Exp Neurol 325:113159 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 199.L Garcez M, et al (2016) The anti-inflammatory role of minocycline in Alzheimer s disease. Current Alzheimer Research 13(12), p 1319–1329 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 200.Gholami Mahmoudian Z et al (2023) Minocycline effects on memory and learning impairment in the beta-amyloid-induced Alzheimer’s disease model in male rats using behavioral, biochemical, and histological methods. Eur J Pharmacol 953:175784> [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 201.Yulug B et al (2018) Therapeutic role of rifampicin in Alzheimer’s disease. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 72(3):152–159 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 202.Angelucci F et al (2019) Antibiotics, gut microbiota, and Alzheimer’s disease. J Neuroinflammation 16(1):108 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 203.Lim B et al (2017) Engineered regulatory systems modulate gene expression of human commensals in the gut. Cell 169(3):547-558.e15 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 204.Peng A et al (2018) Altered composition of the gut microbiome in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy. Epilepsy Res 147:102–107 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 205.Akbari E et al (2016) Effect of probiotic supplementation on cognitive function and metabolic status in Alzheimer’s disease: a randomized, double-blind and controlled trial. Front Aging Neurosci 8:256 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 206.Hsieh T-H et al (2020) Probiotics alleviate the progressive deterioration of motor functions in a mouse model of Parkinson’s disease. Brain Sci 10(4):206 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 207.Castelli V et al (2020) Effects of the probiotic formulation SLAB51 in in vitro and in vivo Parkinson’s disease models. Aging (Albany NY) 12(5):4641–4659 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 208.Chang J-S et al (2019) Probiotics Lactobacillus plantarum PS128 intervention in two patients with major depressive disorder. Taiwanese Journal of Psychiatry 33(2):116–117 [Google Scholar]
  • 209.Chen H-M et al (2021) Psychophysiological effects of lactobacillus plantarum ps128 in patients with major depressive disorder: a preliminary 8-week open trial. Nutrients 13(11):3731 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 210.Chong H et al (2019) Lactobacillus plantarum DR7 alleviates stress and anxiety in adults: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Beneficial microbes 10(4):355–373 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 211.Liu G et al (2020) Lactobacillus plantarum DR7 modulated bowel movement and gut microbiota associated with dopamine and serotonin pathways in stressed adults. Int J Mol Sci 21(13):4608 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 212.Elhossiny RM et al (2023) Assessment of probiotic strain Lactobacillus acidophilus LB supplementation as adjunctive management of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder in children and adolescents: a randomized controlled clinical trial. BMC Psychiatry 23(1):823 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 213.Liu Y-W et al (2023) Probiotic intervention in young children with autism spectrum disorder in Taiwan: A randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders 109:102256 [Google Scholar]
  • 214.Brzóska-Konkol E, Remberk B, Papasz-Siemienuk A (2022) Analysis of research on the effectiveness of using probiotics for children with autism spectrum disorders, in order to reduce the core and accompanying autism symptoms. Review of randomized clinical trials. Postep Psychiatr Neurol 31(1), p 25–34 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 215.Hetta HF et al (2024) Gut microbiome as a target of intervention in inflammatory bowel disease pathogenesis and therapy. Immuno 4(4):400–425 [Google Scholar]
  • 216.David LA et al (2014) Diet rapidly and reproducibly alters the human gut microbiome. Nature 505(7484):559–563 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 217.Roychowdhury S et al (2018) Faecalibacterium prausnitzii and a prebiotic protect intestinal health in a mouse model of antibiotic and Clostridium difficile exposure. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 42(7):1156–1167 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 218.Dahl WJ, Rivero Mendoza D, Lambert JM Lambert (2020) Diet, nutrients and the microbiome. Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci 171, p 237–263 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 219.Rocha NP, De Miranda AS, Teixeira AL (2015) Insights into neuroinflammation in Parkinson’s disease: from biomarkers to anti-inflammatory based therapies. BioMed research international 2015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 220.Szala-Rycaj J et al (2023) The influence of topinambur and inulin preventive supplementation on microbiota, anxious behavior, cognitive functions and neurogenesis in mice exposed to the chronic unpredictable mild stress. Nutrients 15(9):2041 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 221.Kinney JW et al (2018) Inflammation as a central mechanism in Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimer’s & Dementia: Translational Research & Clinical Interventions 4:575–590 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 222.Siniscalco D et al (2018) Inflammation and neuro-immune dysregulations in autism spectrum disorders. Pharmaceuticals 11(2):56 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 223.Ng QX, et al (2018) The role of inflammation in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Journal of inflammation research, p 345–349 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 224.Li W, et al (2020) Probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics for the treatment of dementia: protocol for a systematic review. Medicine 99(5) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 225.Burokas A et al (2017) Targeting the microbiota-gut-brain axis: prebiotics have anxiolytic and antidepressant-like effects and reverse the impact of chronic stress in mice. Biol Psychiatry 82(7):472–487 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 226.Vijaya AK et al (2024) Prebiotics mitigate the detrimental effects of high-fat diet on memory, anxiety and microglia functionality in Ageing Mice. Brain Behav Immun 122:167–184 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 227.Yang XD et al (2018) Effects of prebiotic galacto-oligosaccharide on postoperative cognitive dysfunction and neuroinflammation through targeting of the gut-brain axis. BMC Anesthesiol 18(1):177 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 228.Berding K et al (2021) Diet and the microbiota-gut-brain axis: sowing the seeds of good mental health. Adv Nutr 12(4):1239–1285 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 229.Liu WH et al (2016) Alteration of behavior and monoamine levels attributable to Lactobacillus plantarum PS128 in germ-free mice. Behav Brain Res 298(Pt B):202–209 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 230.Zhou ZL et al (2019) Neuroprotection of fasting mimicking diet on MPTP-induced Parkinson’s disease mice via gut microbiota and metabolites. Neurotherapeutics 16(3):741–760 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 231.Xie G et al (2017) Ketogenic diet poses a significant effect on imbalanced gut microbiota in infants with refractory epilepsy. World J Gastroenterol 23(33):6164–6171 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 232.Mukherjee P et al (2019) Therapeutic benefit of combining calorie-restricted ketogenic diet and glutamine targeting in late-stage experimental glioblastoma. Commun Biol 2:200 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 233.He Z et al (2017) Fecal microbiota transplantation cured epilepsy in a case with Crohn’s disease: The first report. World J Gastroenterol 23(19):3565–3568 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 234.Makkawi S, Camara-Lemarroy C, Metz L (2018) Fecal microbiota transplantation associated with 10 years of stability in a patient with SPMS. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm 5(4):e459 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 235.Huang H et al (2019) Fecal microbiota transplantation to treat Parkinson’s disease with constipation: A case report. Medicine (Baltimore) 98(26):e16163 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 236.Vendrik KEW et al (2020) Fecal microbiota transplantation in neurological disorders. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 10:98 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 237.Zhan G et al (2018) Abnormal gut microbiota composition contributes to cognitive dysfunction in SAMP8 mice. Aging (Albany NY) 10(6):1257–1267 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 238.Li N et al (2019) Fecal microbiota transplantation from chronic unpredictable mild stress mice donors affects anxiety-like and depression-like behavior in recipient mice via the gut microbiota-inflammation-brain axis. Stress 22(5):592–602 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 239.Borody T, et al 2011 Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) in multiple sclerosis (MS): 942. Official journal of the American College of Gastroenterology| ACG 106, p S352
  • 240.Fujii Y et al (2019) Fecal metabolite of a gnotobiotic mouse transplanted with gut microbiota from a patient with Alzheimer’s disease. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 83(11):2144–2152 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 241.Cammarota G et al (2017) European consensus conference on faecal microbiota transplantation in clinical practice. Gut 66(4):569–580 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 242.Malikowski T, Khanna S, Pardi DS (2017) Fecal microbiota transplantation for gastrointestinal disorders. Curr Opin Gastroenterol 33(1):8–13 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.


Articles from Molecular Neurobiology are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES