Skip to main content
. 2025 Mar 22;9(3):437–464. doi: 10.1007/s41666-025-00195-8

Table 2.

Comparison of non-IID estimation algorithms

Variability Separability Computational time (min.)
Performance evaluation Averaged value [MIMIC-III’s value, MIMIC-IV’s value, eICU-CRD 40%’s value]
Our method 0.011 [0.012, 0.014, 0.008] 0.998 [0.998, 1, 0.995] 0.8 [0.6, 0.7, 1.0]
He et al. [21] 0.337 [0.155, 0.737, 0.120] 0.767 [0.808, 0.817, 0.676] 368.5 [344.7, 417.0, 343.8]
Li et al. [22] 0.105 [0.121, 0.102, 0.093] 0.795 [0.790, 0.930, 0.666] 17.4 [16.7, 18.7, 16.9]
Zhao et al. [23] 0.338 [0.184, 0.289, 0.541] 0.650 [0.673, 0.713, 0.564] 2161.0 [2094.4, 2166.9, 2221.6]