Table 2.
Comparison of non-IID estimation algorithms
Variability | Separability | Computational time (min.) | |
---|---|---|---|
Performance evaluation | Averaged value [MIMIC-III’s value, MIMIC-IV’s value, eICU-CRD 40%’s value] | ||
Our method | 0.011 [0.012, 0.014, 0.008] | 0.998 [0.998, 1, 0.995] | 0.8 [0.6, 0.7, 1.0] |
He et al. [21] | 0.337 [0.155, 0.737, 0.120] | 0.767 [0.808, 0.817, 0.676] | 368.5 [344.7, 417.0, 343.8] |
Li et al. [22] | 0.105 [0.121, 0.102, 0.093] | 0.795 [0.790, 0.930, 0.666] | 17.4 [16.7, 18.7, 16.9] |
Zhao et al. [23] | 0.338 [0.184, 0.289, 0.541] | 0.650 [0.673, 0.713, 0.564] | 2161.0 [2094.4, 2166.9, 2221.6] |