Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2025 Jul 27.
Published before final editing as: Addiction. 2025 Jul 1:10.1111/add.70114. doi: 10.1111/add.70114

TABLE 3.

Secondary outcomes of self-reported withdrawal and craving during use of oral nicotine pouches with varied fractions of freebase nicotine versus moist snuff in a sample of healthy adults who use moist snuff, rural and Appalachian Ohio, 2023–2024.a

Low FBN ONP n = 53b
Mean (SD)
High FBN ONP n = 52b
Mean (SD)
Moist snuff n = 53b
Mean (SD)
Comparison across products
P-value
Low FBN ONP vs. moist snuff
P-valuec
High FBN ONP vs. moist snuff
P-valuec
Low FBN ONP vs. high FBN ONP
P-valuec

MNWS withdrawal symptomsd
 5 min 5.7 (5.5) 5.4 (4.5) 5.1 (5.4) 0.81
 15 min 5.0 (5.4) 4.1 (3.5) 3.6 (4.6) 0.22
 30 min 4.7 (6.0) 4.0 (4.0) 2.9 (3.3) 0.09
 60 min 5.3 (5.7) 4.2 (4.4) 4.4 (4.8) 0.72
 90 min 5.5 (5.5) 4.6 (4.5) 4.7 (5.0) 0.69
MNWS craving
 5 min 1.5 (1.3) 1.9 (1.4) 1.2 (1.4) 0.003 0.03 <0.001 0.23
 15 min 1.5 (1.4) 1.4 (1.3) 1.0 (1.3) 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.75
 30 min 1.4 (1.4) 1.4 (1.4) 0.8 (1.1) 0.001 <0.001 0.004 0.62
 60 min 1.7 (1.4) 1.4 (1.4) 1.5 (1.4) 0.17
 90 min 1.7 (1.4) 1.5 (1.5) 1.6 (1.5) 0.36
QSU-Brief Desire subscaled
 5 min 18.6 (9.3) 21.0 (9.0) 18.7 (9.0) 0.08
 15 min 17.7 (9.7) 18.3 (9.6) 14.7 (8.5) 0.001 <0.001 0.002 0.82
 30 min 17.4 (9.5) 17.7 (10.3) 14.8 (8.3) 0.006 0.003 0.01 0.62
 60 min 18.4 (9.1) 18.9 (10.2) 17.8 (9.3) 0.49
 90 min 19.3 (9.5) 19.5 (10.3) 19.6 (9.5) 0.83
QSU-Brief Relief subscale
 5 min 10.7 (5.9) 11.7 (6.9) 10.0 (5.7) 0.09
 15 min 9.8 (5.9) 9.9 (6.4) 8.8 (4.9) 0.17
 30 min 9.4 (5.9) 9.7 (6.5) 7.6 (4.0) 0.003 <0.001 0.02 0.31
 60 min 9.5 (5.5) 10.2 (7.1) 9.1 (5.3) 0.59
 90 min 9.9 (6.3) 10.5 (7.1) 9.4 (5.1) 0.79

Abbreviations: FBN, freebase nicotine; ONP, oral nicotine pouch; MNWS, Minnesota Withdrawal Scale; QSU-Brief, Questionnaire of Smoking Urges brief form.

a

n = 62 participants were recruited from rural and Appalachian Ohio counties to complete a three-visit, single-blind, randomized cross-over experiment. Study ONPs were 6 mg nicotine concentration and peppermint flavor. The low FBN ONP was Rogue brand, and the high FBN ONP was Zyn brand.

b

Participant counts do not sum to the total analytic sample size (n = 62) because of study attrition and visit-level exclusions from the analytic sample because of noncompliance with nicotine abstinence.

c

Statistical significance following Holm’s procedure is denoted using bold.

d

Variable was log-transformed for analyses. Untransformed means and SDs are reported in this table.