Skip to main content
Biology logoLink to Biology
. 2025 Jul 6;14(7):821. doi: 10.3390/biology14070821

Comparison of Environmental DNA Metabarcoding and Underwater Visual Census for Assessing Macrobenthic Diversity

Zifeng Zhan 1,2,3, Weiwei Huo 1,2, Shangwei Xie 4, Wandong Chen 4, Xinming Liu 5, Kuidong Xu 1,3, Yanli Lei 1,3,*
Editor: Zuozhi Chen
PMCID: PMC12292762  PMID: 40723380

Simple Summary

This study evaluates the efficacy of environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding and underwater visual census (UVC) in assessing the diversity of subtidal macrobenthic communities. We compared water eDNA, sediment eDNA, and traditional UVC methods in the Nanji Islands, China. Sediment eDNA demonstrated superior performance in detecting key benthic phyla such as Annelida and Arthropoda, whereas UVC was more effective for large and active organisms. Integrating these methods provides a more comprehensive biodiversity assessment, highlighting the importance of combining molecular and traditional techniques for effective conservation and management strategies in marine ecosystems.

Keywords: eDNA, species detection efficiency, marine protected area, subtidal zone, biodiversity assessment

Abstract

The rapid advancement of environmental DNA (eDNA) technology has transformed ecological research, particularly in aquatic ecosystems. However, the optimal sampling matrix (e.g., water or sediment) and the potential for eDNA to replace or complement traditional underwater visual census (UVC) remain unclear. Here, we integrate water eDNA, sediment eDNA, and UVC approaches to systematically compare the diversity of benthic macrofauna in the subtidal zones of the Nanji Islands, China. Our results show that sediment eDNA samples exhibited the highest species richness, while UVC had the lowest. Each method revealed distinct species profiles, with relatively few shared taxa at the order level and below. Environmental eDNA showed significant advantages in detecting key phyla such as Annelida and Arthropoda. In contrast, traditional UVC was crucial for identifying certain taxa, such as Bryozoa, which were undetectable by eDNA methods. The low overlap in species detected by these methods underscores their complementary nature, highlighting the necessity of integrating multiple approaches to achieve a more comprehensive and accurate biodiversity assessment. Future research should focus on refining eDNA techniques, such as developing more universal primers, to further enhance their applicability in biodiversity monitoring.

1. Introduction

The subtidal zone, a critical interface between intertidal zones and shallow sea, usually harbors a rich diversity of benthic fauna, yet it is one of the areas most severely affected by human activities [1]. Traditional in situ observations through underwater visual census (UVC)—where trained SCUBA divers survey species richness and community assemblages in the field—have long been the predominant method for studying marine organisms [2]. However, this approach is limited by the need for specialized skills, suitable field conditions, and significant resources [3]. Moreover, the complex currents and topography of subtidal zones often pose substantial challenges for UVC surveys, restricting the comprehensive biomonitoring of these habitats [4].

Recent advancements in environmental DNA (eDNA) technology have revolutionized biodiversity assessments in aquatic ecosystems [5]. eDNA metabarcoding allows for the non-invasive detection of species through the analysis of genetic material present in environmental samples such as water and sediment [6]. This approach has been successfully applied to monitor fish and invertebrate communities in various aquatic habitats, including rivers, lakes, and marine environments [5,6,7,8]. However, the optimal sampling matrix (water vs. sediment) and the potential for eDNA to replace or complement the traditional UVC method to access the macrobenthos diversity remain uncertain.

The Nanji Islands, located in the eastern sea area of Zhejiang Province, China, is a biosphere reserve of the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). This subtropical marine protected area is characterized by complex subtidal zones with high biodiversity [9]. The seabed terrain in this area slopes downwards from northwest to southeast, with a water depth generally between 15 and 25 m. There are two deep-water channels on the northeast and southwest sides of Nanji Island, with a depth of over 30 m and a maximum depth of 45 m. The subtidal areas here include several distinct habitat types, such as steep rocky cliffs, platforms, boulder fields, small area beaches, and sediments mainly composed of silty clay. Due to the fact that the subtidal zone with a depth less than 20 m is mainly composed of rocks, bottom trawl survey is impossible, and box-type mud collection is also limited. While the underwater visual census (UVC) is the remaining available traditional method, a systematic biodiversity survey is still lacking.

Generally, the Nanji Islands provide an ideal setting for comparing the effectiveness of different biodiversity assessment methods. In this study, we integrate water eDNA, sediment eDNA, and UVC methods to systematically compare their efficiency in detecting benthic macrofaunal diversity in the subtidal zone with a depth < 20 m of the Nanji Islands. Our objectives are to quantify the differences in species detection efficiency among the three methods, and explore the complementary nature of these methods across different taxonomic levels.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Area and Sample Location

The Nanji Islands (27°27′43″ N–27°46′48″ N, 120°02′55″ E–121°07′58″ E) are located in the eastern sea area of Wenzhou City, Zhejiang Province, China. This subtropical marine protected area is characterized by mainly rocky inter- and sub-tidal zones with high biodiversity. Ten subtidal sites representing the broader subtidal environment were selected for this study based on accessibility by boat on 8–10 May 2024 (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Sampling sites in the subtidal zone of the Nanji Islands (The capitalized names in the right-side figure are abbreviations for each sub-island. “SMA” stands for “Shangmaan”, “XMA” for “Xiamaan”, “PY” for “Poyu”, “JY” for “Jianyu”, “XCY” for “Xiaochaiyu”, “LCJ” for “Longchuanjiao”, “DSJ” for “Dashanjiao”, “SPW” for “Sanpanwei”, “HJS” for “Houjishan”, and “DLS” for “Daleishan”).

2.2. Underwater Visual Census (UVC) and Photo Analysis

UVC survey conducted during high-tide period. The basic unit of UVC was a 50 m long transect line, with macrobenthos surveyed in two 1 m wide by 2 m high bands on either side of the transect line [10]. The proportions of the area examined in relation to the rocky subtidal area of each site ranged from approximately 10% to 30%. Digital photo-quadrats were taken at 2.5 m intervals along the transect line (i.e., 20 per 50 m transect). Due to the extremely low transparency of seawater (<1 m), the SMA, DSJ, HJS, and DLS sites were not suitable for diving. Consequently, the UVC units of only six stations with a depth range of 5–15 m were completely investigated (Figure 1, marked by green color). Two taxonomists (W. Huo and W. Chen) estimated the number of species from the visual data together, without prior knowledge of the eDNA outcomes. Due to the generally low transparency of seawater, many photo-quadrats were not very clear, and only 30 species could be identified to species level (Table A1).

2.3. Environmental DNA Sampling

Water and sediment samples were collected from ten stations in the subtidal zones of the Nanji Islands. Considering that the larvae of benthic organisms may float in surface water layers, 1 L of seawater was collected from both surface and bottom layers by divers to gather as much macrobenthos eDNA as possible. The samples were mixed thoroughly, and 1.5 L seawater was filtered [11] through a 0.22 µm mixed cellulose ester (MCE) membrane, and the filter paper was immediately transferred to a 1.5 mL cryopreservation tube and stored at −20 °C.

Sediment samples were collected using a grab sampler near the water sampling sites. At the sites XMA and XCY, however, the sediment could not be collected by the grab sampler due to the thin sediment layer. Instead, divers collected sediment using 50 mL centrifuge tubes in those sites. Approximately 20 g of surface sediment was placed into a sterile, enzyme-free sampling bag and stored at −20 °C until further analysis.

2.4. DNA Extraction and Sequencing

Environmental DNA was extracted from water sample filters using the DNeasy Power Water Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and from sediment samples using the QIAamp PowerFecal Pro DNA Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), following standardized protocols to ensure high extraction efficiency and purity. The COI gene fragments were targeted and amplified using universal primers mlCOIintF (5′-GGWACWGGWTGAACWGTWTAYCCYCC-3′) [12] and jgHCO2198 (5′-TAIACYTCIGGRTGICCRAARAAYCA-3′) [13]. The PCR conditions were as follows: initial denaturation at 94 °C for 3 min, followed by 35 cycles of 94 °C for 30 s, 55 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 2 min, with a final extension at 72 °C for 5 min. Negative controls (DNA-free samples) were processed in parallel to ensure the reliability of the PCR. Sequence libraries were prepared using the TruSeq® DNA PCR-Free Kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) and quantified by Qubit and Q-PCR. The libraries were sequenced as 250 bp paired-end reads on a NovaSeq 6000 platform.

2.5. Bioinformatics Analysis

Raw sequencing data were processed using DADA2 (version 2.15.2) to remove primer sequences and low-quality reads [14]. Amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) were clustered at 97% similarity using VSEARCH, and ASVs with less than 0.01% abundance across all samples were filtered out [15,16]. Taxonomic annotations were performed against the NCBI database, focusing on eukaryotic groups. Non-marine groups (e.g., Arachnida, Insecta, and terrestrial Craniata) were manually excluded from the ASV table [17].

2.6. Statistical Analyses

To comprehensively assess the species diversity based on the three methods, species richness, Shannon–Wiener diversity, and Pielou’s evenness indices were employed. Species richness and the relative ratio of species number at class, order, and family level were compared among UVC, sediment eDNA, and water eDNA methods. Venn diagrams were generated to assess overlapping taxa detected by the different methods. As the species diversity data from sediment and water eDNA did not meet the normal distribution assumption (Shapiro–Wilk test, p < 0.05) or the homogeneity of variance assumption (Bartlett test, p < 0.05), a nonparametric Kruskal–Wallis test was used to analyze intergroup differences in species diversity. Post hoc Dunn tests with Holm–Bonferroni correction for p-values were further conducted to evaluate species diversity differences across different methods.

In the analysis of the community structure, Jaccard distances were calculated based on species composition matrices, and non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) was used to visualize community differences among the three methods. The reliability of the ordination was evaluated by the stress value (the closer the value is to zero, the higher the degree of fit). The clustering of samples was observed in the NMDS plot, and the significance of community structure differences among groups was verified by ANOSIM tests (based on Jaccard distances). All statistical analyses and figures were performed using R version 4.0.3, with plots created using the ggplot2 package (version 3.3.3) [18].

3. Results

3.1. Sequencing and UVC Results

Only eight of ten water and sediment eDNA samples were successfully amplified even after repeating the PCR experiments several times, respectively (Figure 1, successful amplification stations marked by yellow and blue colors, respectively). A total of 657,161 and 752,136 raw reads were obtained from water and sediment eDNA samples, respectively. After bioinformatics processing, 1879 and 7487 amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) were identified for water and sediment eDNA, respectively. The majority of ASVs (79.30% for water eDNA and 64.90% for sediment eDNA) were either taxonomically unassigned or belonged to non-marine groups. The remaining ASVs represented a diverse range of marine taxa, including 11 phyla, 22 classes, 47 orders, 72 families, 72 genera, and 94 species for water eDNA; and 14 phyla, 28 classes, 64 orders, 114 families, 125 genera, and 166 species for sediment eDNA. In contrast, UVC identified a total of nine phyla, 16 classes, 18 orders, 29 families, 29 genera, and 39 species based on photo-quadrat analysis. Overall, the three methods collectively identified 15 phyla, 38 classes, 89 orders, 179 families, 206 genera, and 284 species (Table 1 and Table A1).

Table 1.

Species number of phyla using sediment and water eDNA and UVC methods.

Phylum Sediment Water UVC
Annelida 22 8 1
Arthropoda 48 14 1
Bryozoa 0 0 5
Chaetognatha 1 4 0
Chordata 5 1 1
Cnidaria 26 32 7
Ctenophora 2 0 1
Echinodermata 5 4 4
Gastrotricha 6 1 0
Mollusca 37 19 17
Nematoda 3 0 0
Nemertea 2 2 0
Phoronida 1 0 0
Platyhelminthes 1 2 0
Porifera 7 7 2
total 166 94 39

3.2. Comparison of the Taxonomic Compositions Among the Three Methods

Taxonomic compositions were compared among the three methods at five common stations (Figure 2). Sediment eDNA detected the highest number of phyla (13), classes (27), and species (131), followed by water eDNA (10 phyla, 21 classes, 72 species) and UVC (seven phyla, 14 classes, 15 orders, 32 species). At the phylum level, sediment and water eDNA showed similar compositions, with Mollusca, Arthropoda, and Cnidaria being dominant (Table 1). In contrast, UVC identified Mollusca, Cnidaria, and Bryozoa as the most dominant group, and the Bryozoa was undetectable by eDNA methods (Figure 2a). At the class level, sediment eDNA was dominated by Gastropoda, followed by Malacostraca and Hydrozoa, while water eDNA showed a similar pattern with Gastropoda, Hydrozoa, and Demospongiae as dominant classes. UVC identified Gastropoda, Anthozoa, and Demospongiae as the dominant classes (Figure 2b). At the order level, sediment eDNA showed Anthomedusae, Decapoda, and Stylommatophora as dominant orders, while water eDNA was dominated by Leptothecata, Anthoathecata, and Stylommatophora. UVC identified Neogastropoda, Nudibranchia, and Demospongiae as dominant orders (Figure 2c).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Stacked bar charts showing the percentage of species richness at the phylum (a), class (b), and order (c) levels for underwater visual census (UVC) and sediment (Sed) and water eDNA methods.

Venn diagrams revealed relatively high taxon overlaps at the phylum and class levels, and low overlaps at the order level and below among the taxonomic compositions from the three methods (Figure 3). Sediment eDNA detected the highest number of species overall, while traditional UVC methods detected fewer but unique species. No common species was found among the three methods. Only 18 common species were found between sediment and water eDNA samples, and only 1 common species was found between traditional UVC and sediment/water eDNA samples.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Venn diagrams showing the species overlaps at the different taxonomic ranks detected by underwater visual census (UVC) and sediment (Sed) and water eDNA methods at the common stations.

3.3. Alpha and Beta Diversity Among the Three Methods

Species richness was highest in sediment eDNA samples across all stations except LCJ, with UVC showing the lowest species richness (Figure 4a). Overall, sediment eDNA samples exhibited the highest average species richness, while UVC had the lowest (Figure 4b). The Kruskal–Wallis test and post hoc Dunn test indicated significant differences in species richness between sediment eDNA and UVC methods (Figure 4c). Sediment eDNA also consistently showed higher Shannon and Pielou’s evenness indices compared to water eDNA, indicating superior performance in both species abundance and community evenness (Figure 4d,e).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Alpha and beta diversity analyses based on sediment eDNA, water eDNA, and underwater visual census (UVC) methods. (a) Species richness based on the sediment eDNA, water eDNA, and UVC at the common sampling stations (JY, LCJ, PY, XCY, XMA). (b) The total species richness based on the three methods from all the common stations. (c) Significant richness differences among the three methods conducted by post hoc Dunn tests. *, indicating significant differences. (d) The total Shannon index based on the three methods from all the common stations. (e) The total Pielou’s evenness index based on the three methods from all the common stations. (f) The clustering of samples with non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) plot.

Non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) ordination plots showed distinct clustering of samples from sediment eDNA, water eDNA, and UVC methods, with no overlap among the groups (Figure 4f). The stress value of zero and an ANOSIM test p-value of 0.001 confirmed the high reliability of the ordination results, indicating significant differences in community structure captured by the three methods. This suggests that each method provides unique insights into the biodiversity of the subtidal zone, highlighting the importance of integrating multiple approaches for comprehensive biodiversity assessment.

4. Discussion

4.1. Environmental DNA Is Essential for Biodiversity Assessment of Rocky Subtidal Zone

Traditional bottom trawling and grab sampling are unsuitable for biodiversity assessments in rocky subtidal zones. Underwater visual census (UVC) is often used for macrobenthic surveys, but its effectiveness is limited by low seawater transparency, as seen in this study. Compared to UVC, the present study demonstrates that eDNA is more effective for assessing benthic macrofaunal diversity, particularly for key phyla such as Annelida and Arthropoda (Table 1; Figure 3). The sediment eDNA detected a significantly higher species richness compared to the UVC method (Figure 4). Generally, both the sediment and water eDNA methods can uncover those relatively smaller benthos (e.g., Chaetognatha, Gastrotricha, Nemertea, Platyhelminthes, and most of Annelida and Arthropoda) that were missed by the UVC survey (Table 1 and Table A1). Furthermore, eDNA showed significant differences in community structure with the UVC (Figure 4f).

In terms of total number, the sediment eDNA detected more species than the water eDNA (166 vs. 94; Table 1). For all the phyla except Cnidaria and Chaetognatha, the sediment eDNA detected no less species than the water eDNA (Table 1). Notably, sediment eDNA failed to detect Octocorallia species, which were uncovered by water eDNA. Most octocorals prefer to live on hard substrates such as rocks, rather than sediments. Consequently, the octocoral eDNA in the sediment is too rare to amplify. In contrast, the eDNA concentration in water samples increases after filtration and concentration, which may contain more octocoral eDNA. For the planktonic Chaetognatha, it is not surprising that the water eDNA detected more species than the sediment eDNA (Table A1).

For the macrobenthos, the superior detection efficiency of sediment eDNA is likely due to the higher concentration and longer persistence of DNA in sediments compared to water samples, which allows for retrospective genetic monitoring and extends the seasonal window for species assessment [19,20,21,22,23,24,25]. For example, the decay rate of fish eDNA in sediment is significantly lower than that in water (0.033%/h vs. 1.9%/h), and eDNA is 8–1800 times more concentrated in sediment than in water. This suggests that sediment eDNA can capture a broader range of species, including those that may be temporarily absent or less active in the water column.

4.2. Limitations of Traditional UVC and eDNA Methods

While the traditional UVC method is effective for detecting large and highly active organisms, they have limited capacity for detecting small or cryptic species [2,26]. In the present study, this limitation is partly due to the difficulty in capturing and identifying relatively small organisms such as polychaetes (belonging to the phylum Annelida), Chaetognatha, Gastrotricha, Nemertea, Platyhelminthes, and Arthropoda, which often require further taxonomic examination under a microscope. Additionally, environmental factors such as water turbidity in the subtidal zones can further reduce the effectiveness of the UVC method. However, traditional UVC remains valuable for certain taxa that may not be well-represented in eDNA samples, such as Bryozoa, which was undetectable by eDNA in our study but was identified through the UVC method.

The missed detection of Bryozoa highlights the need for further refinement of eDNA techniques. The COI primers used in this study failed to detect Bryozoa, indicating potential limitations in primer universality or suboptimal annealing temperature for PCR reactions. Additionally, the incomplete nature of current DNA sequence databases limits the accuracy of species-level identifications. Future research should focus on developing more universal primers and optimal PCR reactions, and expanding reference databases to improve the reliability and resolution of eDNA-based biodiversity assessments.

4.3. Complementary Nature of the Methods and Implications for Biodiversity Monitoring

In general, taxonomic compositions from the three methods shared relatively few taxa at the order level and below, and no common species was found among these methods (Figure 2c and Figure 3). The low overlap in species detected by the three methods underscores their complementary nature. Sediment eDNA provided the most comprehensive species inventory, detecting a significantly higher number of species compared to water eDNA and traditional UVC methods. However, the unique detection of certain taxa by the UVC method highlights the importance of integrating both eDNA and UVC approaches for a more complete assessment of biodiversity. This integration can help overcome the limitations of each method, such as primer bias in eDNA techniques and the challenges of species identification in traditional methods. Future biodiversity monitoring efforts should consider the complementary nature of these methods and the potential for further technological advancements to enhance the accuracy and efficiency of biodiversity assessments. This integrated approach will be crucial for informing effective conservation and management strategies in complex aquatic environments.

5. Conclusions

The present study provides a comprehensive evaluation of environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding of COI and traditional underwater visual census (UVC) methods for assessing benthic macrofaunal diversity in subtidal zones. While taxonomic compositions from the three methods show similar patterns at the phylum level, they share relatively few taxa at the order level and below. Sediment eDNA emerged as a highly effective tool, particularly for detecting key benthic phyla such as Annelida and Arthropoda, due to its enhanced preservation and detection capabilities. However, traditional UVC remains crucial for identifying certain taxa, such as Bryozoa, which were undetectable by eDNA methods. The low overlap in species detected by these methods underscores their complementary nature, highlighting the necessity of integrating multiple approaches to achieve a more comprehensive and accurate biodiversity assessment. Future research should focus on refining eDNA techniques, such as developing more universal primers and expanding reference databases, to further enhance their applicability in biodiversity monitoring.

Acknowledgments

We thank Xiaoyu Zheng for help with photo collection.

Appendix A

Table A1.

Species composition based on the sediment and water eDNA and UVC methods.

Species ID Sediment Water UVC Phylum Class Order Family Genus Species
OTU_1958 1 1 0 Annelida Polychaeta Polychaeta sp. NB-Po509
OTU_1601 1 0 0 Annelida Clitellata Enchytraeida Enchytraeidae Enchytronia Enchytronia christenseni
OTU_4793 1 0 0 Annelida Polychaeta Terebellida Flabelligeridae Treadwellius Treadwellius bifidus
OTU_16546 1 0 0 Annelida Polychaeta Maldanidae Asychis Asychis chilensis
OTU_17049 1 0 0 Annelida Clitellata Crassiclitellata Megascolecidae Perionyx Perionyx rufulus
OTU_5756 1 0 0 Annelida Polychaeta Phyllodocida Nereididae Neanthes Neanthes sp. RP2011-N
OTU_7431 1 0 0 Annelida Polychaeta Phyllodocida Nereididae Neanthes Neanthes sp. 1
OTU_4848 1 0 0 Annelida Polychaeta Orbiniidae Scoloplos Scoloplos acmeceps
OTU_2403 1 0 0 Annelida Phascolosomatiformes Phascolosomatidae Phascolosoma Phascolosoma esculenta
OTU_13606 1 0 0 Annelida Polychaeta Sabellida Serpulidae Serpula Serpula vermicularis
OTU_14440 1 0 0 Annelida Polychaeta Sabellida Serpulidae Pileolaria Pileolaria sp. 11BIOAK-0893
OTU_3016 1 0 0 Annelida Polychaeta Sabellida Serpulidae Crucigera Crucigera sp. CMC01
OTU_331 1 0 0 Annelida Polychaeta Sabellida Serpulidae Serpula Serpula columbiana
OTU_7545 1 0 0 Annelida Clitellata Lumbriculida Sparganophilidae Sparganophilus Sparganophilus sp. MAC_SRS_S115
OTU_14076 1 0 0 Annelida Polychaeta Spionida Spionidae Polydora Polydora cornuta
OTU_2533 1 0 0 Annelida Polychaeta Spionida Spionidae Paraprionospio Paraprionospio patiens
OTU_16980 1 0 0 Annelida Polychaeta Terebellida Terebellidae Thelepus Thelepus sp. CMC01
OTU_2402 1 0 0 Annelida Polychaeta Terebellida Terebellidae Lysilla Lysilla pacifica
OTU_15614 1 0 0 Annelida Polychaeta Terebellida Trichobranchidae Terebellides Terebellides stroemii
OTU_17438 1 0 0 Annelida Polychaeta Xenopneusta Urechidae Urechis Urechis unicinctus
OTU_13481 1 0 0 Annelida Polychaeta Polychaeta sp. EBS61o-Po36
OTU_3837 1 0 0 Annelida Polychaeta Polychaeta sp. OPC-2015
OTU_12617 0 1 0 Annelida Polychaeta Sabellida Serpulidae Protolaeospira Protolaeospira eximia
OTU_1436 0 1 0 Annelida Clitellata Rhynchobdellida Glossiphoniidae Torix Torix tukubana
OTU_1486 0 1 0 Annelida Clitellata Crassiclitellata Megascolecidae Amynthas Amynthas exiguus
OTU_2537 0 1 0 Annelida Polychaeta Terebellida Terebellidae Loimia Loimia arborea
OTU_3294 0 1 0 Annelida Polychaeta Sabellida Serpulidae Serpula Serpula vermicularis
OTU_518 0 1 0 Annelida Polychaeta Spionida Trochochaetidae Trochochaeta Trochochaeta multisetosa
OTU_6200 0 1 0 Annelida Polychaeta Phyllodocida Nereididae Nereis Nereis sp. CMC01
UVC_01 0 0 1 Annelida Polychaeta sabellida Sabellidae Sabellidae sp.
UVC_02 0 0 1 Arthropoda Malacostraca Decapoda Paguridae Pagurus Pagurus hedleyi
OTU_2085 1 1 0 Arthropoda Collembola Entomobryomorpha Entomobryidae Entomobrya Entomobrya unostrigata
OTU_13808 1 0 0 Arthropoda Hexanauplia Harpacticoida Aegisthidae Aegisthidae sp. DZMB479
OTU_8881 1 0 0 Arthropoda Hexanauplia Harpacticoida Aegisthidae Aegisthidae sp. 1
OTU_14428 1 0 0 Arthropoda Malacostraca Decapoda Aeglidae Aegla Aegla longirostri complex sp. UFSM SG15
OTU_7458 1 0 0 Arthropoda Hexanauplia Sessilia Archaeobalanidae Conopea Conopea basicuneata
OTU_11323 1 0 0 Arthropoda Ichthyostraca Arguloida Argulidae Argulus Argulus japonicus
OTU_13718 1 0 0 Arthropoda Malacostraca Isopoda Armadillidae Spherillo Spherillo sp. Kanzaki
OTU_5774 1 0 0 Arthropoda Branchiopoda Anostraca Branchipodidae Parartemia Parartemia serventyi
OTU_8686 1 0 0 Arthropoda Branchiopoda Anostraca Branchipodidae Parartemia Parartemia sp. 1
OTU_6592 1 0 0 Arthropoda Malacostraca Decapoda Cambaridae Faxonius Faxonius validus
OTU_14411 1 0 0 Arthropoda Malacostraca Amphipoda Chiltoniidae Chiltoniidae sp. CU1
OTU_5711 1 0 0 Arthropoda Hexanauplia Sessilia Chthamalidae Chthamalus Chthamalus panamensis
OTU_13431 1 0 0 Arthropoda Ostracoda Podocopida Cyprididae Strandesia Strandesia velhoi
OTU_14178 1 0 0 Arthropoda Ostracoda Podocopida Cyprididae Cyprideis Cyprideis torosa
OTU_9379 1 0 0 Arthropoda Ostracoda Podocopida Darwinulidae Darwinula Darwinula stevensoni
OTU_14387 1 0 0 Arthropoda Hexanauplia Calanoida Diaptomidae Hesperodiaptomus Hesperodiaptomus arcticus
OTU_4874 1 0 0 Arthropoda Collembola Symphypleona Dicyrtomidae Dicyrtomidae sp. BIOUG21696-E03
OTU_14442 1 0 0 Arthropoda Collembola Entomobryomorpha Entomobryidae Entomobrya Entomobrya decemfasciata
OTU_5455 1 0 0 Arthropoda Collembola Entomobryomorpha Entomobryidae Lepidocyrtus Lepidocyrtus sp. COLNO287-09
OTU_8097 1 0 0 Arthropoda Collembola Entomobryomorpha Entomobryidae Entomobrya Entomobrya sp. HB0852_3
OTU_4780 1 0 0 Arthropoda Malacostraca Amphipoda Eusiridae Eusiridae sp. 06 MK-2021
OTU_4668 1 0 0 Arthropoda Malacostraca Decapoda Grapsidae Grapsus Grapsus albolineatus
OTU_2814 1 0 0 Arthropoda Malacostraca Isopoda Haploniscidae Mastigoniscus Mastigoniscus sp. NB-Iso41
OTU_14314 1 0 0 Arthropoda Collembola Poduromorpha Hypogastruridae Hypogastruridae sp. BIOUG23106-B05
OTU_7317 1 0 0 Arthropoda Malacostraca Isopoda Ischnomesidae Ischnomesus Ischnomesus sp. lineage 7d JB-2020
OTU_7631 1 0 0 Arthropoda Ostracoda Podocopida Loxoconchidae Microloxoconcha Microloxoconcha ikeyai
OTU_13364 1 0 0 Arthropoda Malacostraca Amphipoda Lysianassidae Eurythenes Eurythenes gryllus
OTU_4425 1 0 0 Arthropoda Malacostraca Amphipoda Lysianassidae Eurythenes Eurythenes sp. 1
OTU_4697 1 0 0 Arthropoda Malacostraca Amphipoda Lysianassidae Eurythenes Eurythenes sp. 2A2 HR-2015
OTU_17634 1 0 0 Arthropoda Hexanauplia Harpacticoida Miraciidae Psammotopa Psammotopa sp. n. SR-2019
OTU_6939 1 0 0 Arthropoda Malacostraca Mysida Mysidae Paramesopodopsis Paramesopodopsis rufa
OTU_1240 1 0 0 Arthropoda Collembola Poduromorpha Neanuridae Morulina Morulina mackenziana
OTU_2412 1 0 0 Arthropoda Malacostraca Decapoda Oregoniidae Pleistacantha Pleistacantha kannu
OTU_1556 1 0 0 Arthropoda Malacostraca Decapoda Palaemonidae Macrobrachium Macrobrachium naiyanetri
OTU_5707 1 0 0 Arthropoda Malacostraca Decapoda Pandalidae Plesionika Plesionika semilaevis
OTU_9864 1 0 0 Arthropoda Malacostraca Decapoda Pandalidae Pandalus Pandalus montagui
OTU_13528 1 0 0 Arthropoda Diplopoda Polyxenida Polyxenidae Polyxenidae sp. Biologic-POLX001
OTU_12157 1 0 0 Arthropoda Malacostraca Decapoda Porcellanidae Petrolisthes Petrolisthes rufescens
OTU_13725 1 0 0 Arthropoda Malacostraca Decapoda Portunidae Portunus Portunus ventralis
OTU_1312 1 0 0 Arthropoda Collembola Entomobryomorpha Tomoceridae Tomocerus Tomocerus ocreatus
OTU_1352 1 0 0 Arthropoda Malacostraca Isopoda Tylidae Tylos Tylos ponticus
OTU_17543 1 0 0 Arthropoda Malacostraca Amphipoda Typhlogammaridae Typhlogammarus Typhlogammarus sp. ZH-2014
OTU_14472 1 0 0 Arthropoda Hexanauplia Sessilia Verrucidae Metaverruca Metaverruca recta
OTU_13506 1 0 0 Arthropoda Malacostraca Amphipoda Amphipoda sp. LPdivOTU157
OTU_17242 1 0 0 Arthropoda Hexanauplia Copepoda Copepoda environmental sample
OTU_2669 1 0 0 Arthropoda Hexanauplia Copepoda Copepoda sp. RR-2014
OTU_6511 1 0 0 Arthropoda Arthropoda environmental sample
OTU_7414 1 0 0 Arthropoda Hexanauplia Harpacticoida Harpacticoida sp. 10BIOBC-00681
OTU_11071 0 1 0 Arthropoda Hexanauplia Calanoida Diaptomidae Allodiaptomus Allodiaptomus mirabilipes
OTU_11156 0 1 0 Arthropoda Ostracoda Podocopida Cyprididae Cypretta Cypretta campechensis
OTU_15398 0 1 0 Arthropoda Arthropoda sp. NZAC 03011539
OTU_15775 0 1 0 Arthropoda Ostracoda Podocopida Candonidae Pseudocandona Pseudocandona hartwigi
OTU_17132 0 1 0 Arthropoda Malacostraca Euphausiacea Euphausiidae Pseudeuphausia Pseudeuphausia sinica
OTU_1993 0 1 0 Arthropoda Collembola Symphypleona Bourletiellidae Heterosminthurus Heterosminthurus sp. 2 JRD-2015
OTU_4032 0 1 0 Arthropoda Malacostraca Amphipoda Stenothoidae Metopa Metopa boeckii
OTU_4984 0 1 0 Arthropoda Hexanauplia Siphonostomatoida Siphonostomatoida sp. DZMB115
OTU_6169 0 1 0 Arthropoda Branchiopoda Diplostraca Limnadiidae Limnadopsis Limnadopsis cf. parvispinus
OTU_6178 0 1 0 Arthropoda Ostracoda Podocopida Cyprididae Ngarawa Ngarawa sp. 950.5
OTU_6301 0 1 0 Arthropoda Malacostraca Isopoda Desmosomatidae Desmosomatidae sp. NB-Iso234
OTU_8282 0 1 0 Arthropoda Malacostraca Isopoda Ligiidae Ligia Ligia baudiniana
OTU_8283 0 1 0 Arthropoda Malacostraca Amphipoda Niphargidae Niphargus Niphargus parenzani
UVC_03 0 0 1 Bryozoa Gymnolaemata Cheilostomatida Membraniporidae Biflustra Biflustra grandicella
UVC_04 0 0 1 Bryozoa Bryozoa sp.
UVC_05 0 0 1 Bryozoa Gymnolaemata Cheilostomatida Bitectiporidae entapora entapora fascialis
UVC_31 0 0 1 Bryozoa Stenolaemata Cyclostomatida Crisiidae Crisia Crisia elongata
UVC_33 0 0 1 Bryozoa Cheilostomatida Candidae Caberea Caberea lata
OTU_10240 1 1 0 Chaetognatha Sagittoidea Aphragmophora Sagittidae Sagitta Sagitta sp. ZP304
OTU_36 0 1 0 Chaetognatha Sagittoidea Aphragmophora Sagittidae Zonosagitta Zonosagitta nagae
OTU_93 0 1 0 Chaetognatha Chaetognatha environmental sample
OTU_971 0 1 0 Chaetognatha Chaetognatha environmental sample
OTU_14459 1 0 0 Chordata Ascidiacea Aplousobranchia Didemnidae Didemnum Didemnum candidum
OTU_13738 1 0 0 Chordata Thaliacea Pyrosomata Pyrosomatidae Pyrostremma Pyrostremma spinosum
OTU_13999 1 0 0 Chordata Thaliacea Salpida Salpidae Cyclosalpa Cyclosalpa sp. USNM IZ 1449879
OTU_13033 1 0 0 Chordata Ascidiacea Stolidobranchia Styelidae Cnemidocarpa Cnemidocarpa verrucosa
OTU_2807 1 0 0 Chordata Ascidiacea Stolidobranchia Styelidae Cnemidocarpa Cnemidocarpa verrucosa
OTU_121 0 1 0 Chordata Ascidiacea Stolidobranchia Styelidae Cnemidocarpa Cnemidocarpa sp. 1
UVC_06 0 0 1 Chordata Ascidiacea Ascidiacea sp.
UVC_30 0 0 0 Chordata Ascidiacea Stolidobranchia Styelidae styela styela canopus
OTU_8074 1 1 0 Cnidaria Hydrozoa Leptothecata Aequoreidae Aequorea Aequorea sp. USNM IZ 1450497
OTU_17794 1 1 0 Cnidaria Hydrozoa Anthoathecata Candelabridae Candelabrum Candelabrum cocksii
OTU_1173 1 1 0 Cnidaria Hydrozoa Leptothecata Clytiidae Clytia Clytia paulensis
OTU_1784 1 1 0 Cnidaria Hydrozoa Leptothecata Clytiidae Clytia Clytia gracilis
OTU_16831 1 1 0 Cnidaria Hydrozoa Anthoathecata Corynidae Coryne Coryne sp. JRH-2014
OTU_17154 1 0 0 Cnidaria Anthozoa Scleractinia Acroporidae Acropora Acropora sp. IP0357
OTU_17856 1 0 0 Cnidaria Hydrozoa Anthoathecata Bougainvilliidae Bougainvillia Bougainvillia muscus
OTU_2568 1 0 0 Cnidaria Anthozoa Scleractinia Caryophylliidae Dasmosmilia Dasmosmilia cf. lymani MVK-2010
OTU_2663 1 0 0 Cnidaria Anthozoa Scleractinia Caryophylliidae Rhizosmilia Rhizosmilia robusta
OTU_9057 1 0 0 Cnidaria Scyphozoa Rhizostomeae Cassiopeidae Cassiopea Cassiopea sp. AUQLCBC
OTU_3574 1 0 0 Cnidaria Hydrozoa Anthoathecata Corynidae Stauridiosarsia Stauridiosarsia cliffordi
OTU_13582 1 0 0 Cnidaria Staurozoa Stauromedusae Craterolophidae Craterolophus Craterolophus convolvulus
OTU_3839 1 0 0 Cnidaria Hydrozoa Anthoathecata Eudendriidae Eudendrium Eudendrium carneum
OTU_5607 1 0 0 Cnidaria Hydrozoa Leptothecata Lafoeidae Lafoea Lafoea dumosa
OTU_10300 1 0 0 Cnidaria Hydrozoa Leptothecata Laodiceidae Laodicea Laodicea undulata
OTU_13976 1 0 0 Cnidaria Staurozoa Stauromedusae Lucernariidae Lucernaria Lucernaria quadricornis
OTU_17088 1 0 0 Cnidaria Staurozoa Stauromedusae Lucernariidae Lucernariidae sp. CCSMA208-10
OTU_10965 1 0 0 Cnidaria Hydrozoa Leptothecata Obeliidae Obelia Obelia dichotoma
OTU_13515 1 0 0 Cnidaria Hydrozoa Leptothecata Obeliidae Obelia Obelia sp. DNZ116
OTU_3127 1 0 0 Cnidaria Hydrozoa Anthoathecata Oceaniidae Turritopsis Turritopsis lata
OTU_14409 1 0 0 Cnidaria Hydrozoa Anthoathecata Pandeidae Leuckartiara Leuckartiara sp. PS-2018
OTU_13700 1 0 0 Cnidaria Hydrozoa Siphonophorae Rhodaliidae Dendrogramma Dendrogramma enigmatica
OTU_4766 1 0 0 Cnidaria Hydrozoa Leptothecata Sertulariidae Fraseroscyphus Fraseroscyphus hozawai
OTU_3775 1 0 0 Cnidaria Anthozoa Scleractinia Siderastreidae Psammocora Psammocora profundacella
OTU_11341 1 0 0 Cnidaria Scyphozoa Semaeostomeae Ulmaridae Aurelia Aurelia sp. IDPAJGB
OTU_8311 1 0 0 Cnidaria Hydrozoa Anthoathecata Zancleidae Zanclea Zanclea sango
OTU_10172 0 1 0 Cnidaria Hydrozoa Leptothecata Eirenidae Helgicirrha Helgicirrha malayensis
OTU_104 0 1 0 Cnidaria Hydrozoa Leptothecata Clytiidae Clytia Clytia hemisphaerica
OTU_10944 0 1 0 Cnidaria Hydrozoa Anthoathecata Corymorphidae Euphysa Euphysa aurata
OTU_11207 0 1 0 Cnidaria Anthozoa Actiniaria Phymanthidae Phymanthus Phymanthus sp. IP0414
OTU_117 0 1 0 Cnidaria Anthozoa Alcyonacea Plexauridae Euplexaura Euplexaura sp. A CSM-2013
OTU_15386 0 1 0 Cnidaria Staurozoa Stauromedusae Haliclystidae Haliclystus Haliclystus inabai
OTU_15496 0 1 0 Cnidaria Hydrozoa Anthoathecata Corynidae Corynidae sp. BCnid2010-002
OTU_15730 0 1 0 Cnidaria Hydrozoa Anthoathecata Asyncorinidae Asyncoryne Asyncoryne ryniensis
OTU_15819 0 1 0 Cnidaria Hydrozoa Siphonophorae Prayidae Praya Praya reticulata
OTU_15894 0 1 0 Cnidaria Scyphozoa Rhizostomeae Rhizostomatidae Rhopilema Rhopilema hispidum
OTU_15897 0 1 0 Cnidaria Hydrozoa Anthoathecata Pandeidae Amphinema Amphinema sp. JRH-2012
OTU_16864 0 1 0 Cnidaria Hydrozoa Leptothecata Plumulariidae Plumularia Plumularia virginiae
OTU_16960 0 1 0 Cnidaria Hydrozoa Anthoathecata Bougainvilliidae Bougainvillia Bougainvillia muscus
OTU_17210 0 1 0 Cnidaria Hydrozoa Siphonophorae Agalmatidae Marrus Marrus sp. BO-2021
OTU_17266 0 1 0 Cnidaria Hydrozoa Anthoathecata Corynidae Coryne Coryne sp. JRH-2014
OTU_1954 0 1 0 Cnidaria Hydrozoa Leptothecata Aglaopheniidae Aglaophenia Aglaophenia tubulifera
OTU_1962 0 1 0 Cnidaria Hydrozoa Leptothecata Obeliidae Obelia Obelia sp. BFHL 2016
OTU_2471 0 1 0 Cnidaria Hydrozoa Anthoathecata Pandeidae Amphinema Amphinema sp. PS-2017
OTU_2502 0 1 0 Cnidaria Hydrozoa Anthoathecata Zancleidae Zanclea Zanclea giancarloi
OTU_3269 0 1 0 Cnidaria Scyphozoa Semaeostomeae Cyaneidae Cyanea Cyanea sp. RUNNPEC
OTU_473 0 1 0 Cnidaria Hydrozoa Anthoathecata Corynidae Coryne Coryne sp. JRH-2014
OTU_5038 0 1 0 Cnidaria Hydrozoa Leptothecata Obeliidae Obelia Obelia bidentata
OTU_8072 0 1 0 Cnidaria Anthozoa Alcyonacea Victorgorgiidae Victorgorgia Victorgorgia sp. 2 KMM-2015
OTU_8128 0 1 0 Cnidaria Anthozoa Scleractinia Acroporidae Astreopora Astreopora myriophthalma
OTU_8132 0 1 0 Cnidaria Scyphozoa Semaeostomeae Pelagiidae Chrysaora Chrysaora lactea
OTU_8177 0 1 0 Cnidaria Scyphozoa Coronatae Nausithoidae Nausithoe Nausithoe sp. NHM_353
OTU_969 0 1 0 Cnidaria Hydrozoa Leptothecata Obeliidae Obelia Obelia sp. MZUSP 3356
UVC_36 0 0 1 Cnidaria Hexacorallia Actiniaria Actiniidae Paracondylactis Paracondylactis sinensis
UVC_07 0 0 1 Cnidaria Octocorallia Malacalcyonacea Melithaeidae Melithaea Melithaea formosa
UVC_08 0 0 1 Cnidaria Hexacorallia Ceriantharia Cerianthidae Cerianthidae sp.
UVC_09 0 0 1 Cnidaria Octocorallia malacalcyonacea Isididae Hicksonella Hicksonella guishanensis
UVC_10 0 0 1 Cnidaria Octocorallia Octocorallia sp.
UVC_11 0 0 1 Cnidaria Hexacorallia Actiniaria Actiniidae Anthopleura Anthopleura japonica
UVC_12 0 0 1 Cnidaria Hexacorallia Actiniaria Actiniidae Anthopleura Anthopleura inornata
OTU_13644 1 0 1 Ctenophora Nuda Beroida Beroidae Beroe Beroe ovata
OTU_14325 1 0 0 Ctenophora Nuda Beroida Beroidae Beroe Beroe sp. 2
UVC_34 0 0 1 Echinodermata Holothuroidea Dendrochirotida Cucumariidae Actinia Actinia equina
OTU_8133 0 0 1 Echinodermata Asteroidea Forcipulatida Asteriidae Stichaster Stichaster striatus
UVC_13 0 0 1 Echinodermata Echinoidea Camarodonta Echinometridae Anthocidaris Anthocidaris crassispina
UVC_14 0 0 1 Echinodermata Echinoidea Camarodonta Temnopleuridae Temnopleurus Temnopleurus hardwickii
OTU_4816 1 0 0 Echinodermata Ophiuroidea Euryalida Gorgonocephalidae Astrodendrum Astrodendrum sp. NSMT:E-6273
OTU_324 1 0 0 Echinodermata Ophiuroidea Amphilepidida Ophiactidae Ophiactis Ophiactis perplexa
OTU_2974 1 0 0 Echinodermata Ophiuroidea Amphilepidida Ophiolepididae Ophiolepis Ophiolepis irregularis
OTU_5418 1 0 0 Echinodermata Ophiuroidea Amphilepidida Ophiotrichidae Ophiothrix Ophiothrix spiculata
OTU_14449 1 0 0 Echinodermata Crinoidea Cyrtocrinida Sclerocrinidae Neogymnocrinus Neogymnocrinus richeri
OTU_11136 0 1 0 Echinodermata Crinoidea Comatulida Antedonidae Antedon Antedon loveni
OTU_16102 0 1 0 Echinodermata Ophiuroidea Euryalida Gorgonocephalidae Astrothrombus Astrothrombus chrysanthi
OTU_466 0 1 0 Echinodermata Crinoidea Comatulida Antedonidae Antedon Antedon loveni
OTU_8133 0 1 0 Echinodermata Asteroidea Forcipulatida Asteriidae Stichaster Stichaster striatus
OTU_17372 1 0 0 Gastrotricha Chaetonotida Chaetonotidae Chaetonotus Chaetonotus aff. gelidus MK-2019
OTU_3701 1 0 0 Gastrotricha Chaetonotida Chaetonotidae Aspidiophorus Aspidiophorus sp. n. MK-2019
OTU_4126 1 0 0 Gastrotricha Chaetonotida Chaetonotidae Aspidiophorus Aspidiophorus sp. 1
OTU_4761 1 0 0 Gastrotricha Chaetonotida Chaetonotidae Chaetonotus Chaetonotus sp. 2 MK-2019
OTU_6356 1 0 0 Gastrotricha Chaetonotida Chaetonotidae Chaetonotus Chaetonotus sp. 1
OTU_7757 1 0 0 Gastrotricha Chaetonotida Chaetonotidae Aspidiophorus Aspidiophorus sp. n. MK-2019
OTU_15575 0 1 0 Gastrotricha Macrodasyida Thaumastodermatidae Tetranchyroderma Tetranchyroderma sp. 3 TK-2011
OTU_1292 1 1 0 Mollusca Gastropoda Cycloneritida Neritidae Neritina Neritina sp. Suji
OTU_1469 1 1 0 Mollusca Gastropoda Systellommatophora Onchidiidae Melayonchis Melayonchis tillieri
OTU_3647 1 1 0 Mollusca Gastropoda Pachychilidae Sulcospira Sulcospira paludiformis
OTU_94 1 1 0 Mollusca Gastropoda Planorbidae Biomphalaria Biomphalaria straminea
OTU_6172 1 1 0 Mollusca Gastropoda Neogastropoda Terebridae Myurella Myurella affinis
OTU_10351 1 0 0 Mollusca Gastropoda Architaenioglossa Ampullariidae Pomacea Pomacea catemacensis
OTU_14521 1 0 0 Mollusca Gastropoda Architaenioglossa Ampullariidae Pomacea Pomacea canaliculata
OTU_7625 1 0 0 Mollusca Gastropoda Aplysiida Aplysiidae Aplysia Aplysia fasciata
OTU_13638 1 0 0 Mollusca Gastropoda Trochida Calliostomatidae Calliostoma Calliostoma iridium
OTU_14338 1 0 0 Mollusca Gastropoda Stylommatophora Camaenidae Xanthomelon Xanthomelon interpositum
OTU_14515 1 0 0 Mollusca Gastropoda Stylommatophora Camaenidae Satsuma Satsuma jacobii
OTU_2134 1 0 0 Mollusca Gastropoda Stylommatophora Camaenidae Satsuma Satsuma hemihelvus
OTU_5901 1 0 0 Mollusca Gastropoda Stylommatophora Camaenidae Satsuma Satsuma sp. SPW-2007
OTU_9949 1 0 0 Mollusca Gastropoda Stylommatophora Clausiliidae Montenegrina Montenegrina helvola
OTU_736 1 0 0 Mollusca Gastropoda Neogastropoda Costellariidae Pusia Pusia savignyi
OTU_6464 1 0 0 Mollusca Gastropoda Nudibranchia Cuthonellidae Cuthonella Cuthonella punicea
OTU_4617 1 0 0 Mollusca Gastropoda Architaenioglossa Diplommatinidae Diplommatina Diplommatina sp. nov. AG MS-2010
OTU_6514 1 0 0 Mollusca Gastropoda Nudibranchia Dotidae Doto Doto coronata
OTU_10095 1 0 0 Mollusca Gastropoda Ellobiida Ellobiidae Ellobium Ellobium scheepmakeri
OTU_3788 1 0 0 Mollusca Gastropoda Lepetellida Fissurellidae Fissurella Fissurella sp. SWA-2011
OTU_2686 1 0 0 Mollusca Gastropoda Stylommatophora Geomitridae Xerocrassa Xerocrassa ponsi
OTU_4632 1 0 0 Mollusca Gastropoda Littorinimorpha Hydrobiidae Marstonia Marstonia lustrica
OTU_14429 1 0 0 Mollusca Gastropoda Neogastropoda Muricidae Concholepas Concholepas concholepas
OTU_9579 1 0 0 Mollusca Gastropoda Neogastropoda Muricidae Drupa Drupa morum
OTU_14543 1 0 0 Mollusca Gastropoda Cycloneritida Neritidae Nerita Nerita atramentosa
OTU_1864 1 0 0 Mollusca Gastropoda Cycloneritida Neritidae Neritina Neritina dilatata
OTU_5511 1 0 0 Mollusca Cephalopoda Teuthida Ommastrephidae Dosidicus Dosidicus gigas
OTU_10283 1 0 0 Mollusca Gastropoda Systellommatophora Onchidiidae Paromoionchis Paromoionchis daemelii
OTU_13627 1 0 0 Mollusca Gastropoda Systellommatophora Onchidiidae Onchidella Onchidella marginata
OTU_14456 1 0 0 Mollusca Gastropoda Pachychilidae Sulcospira Sulcospira paludiformis
OTU_1546 1 0 0 Mollusca Bivalvia Unionida Unionidae Middendorffinaia Middendorffinaia mongolica
OTU_4294 1 0 0 Mollusca Bivalvia Unionida Unionidae Pleuronaia Pleuronaia barnesiana
OTU_4892 1 0 0 Mollusca Bivalvia Unionida Unionidae Toxolasma Toxolasma lividus
OTU_7039 1 0 0 Mollusca Bivalvia Unionida Unionidae Aculamprotula Aculamprotula fibrosa
OTU_10224 1 0 0 Mollusca Gastropoda Littorinimorpha Vermetidae Dendropoma Dendropoma gregarium
OTU_5629 1 0 0 Mollusca Gastropoda Littorinimorpha Vermetidae Dendropoma Dendropoma platypus
OTU_14128 1 0 0 Mollusca Bivalvia Bivalvia environmental sample
OTU_12851 0 1 0 Mollusca Gastropoda Stylommatophora Camaenidae Satsuma Satsuma hemihelvus
OTU_15803 0 1 0 Mollusca Bivalvia Galeommatida Galeommatidae Galeomma Galeomma turtoni
OTU_1980 0 1 0 Mollusca Gastropoda Stylommatophora Geomitridae Candidula Candidula sp. AR_BC7338
OTU_3248 0 1 0 Mollusca Gastropoda Neogastropoda Terebridae Hastula Hastula matheroniana
OTU_3959 0 1 0 Mollusca Gastropoda Physidae Physella Physella acuta
OTU_4408 0 1 0 Mollusca Gastropoda Stylommatophora Helicidae Eobania Eobania vermiculata
OTU_470 0 1 0 Mollusca Gastropoda Plakobranchidae Thuridilla Thuridilla vatae
OTU_6184 0 1 0 Mollusca Gastropoda Cycloneritida Phenacolepadidae Plesiothyreus Plesiothyreus newtoni
OTU_6194 0 1 0 Mollusca Bivalvia Unionida Unionidae Hyriopsis Hyriopsis bialatus complex sp. 2 PP-2017
OTU_6526 0 1 0 Mollusca Gastropoda Stylommatophora Clausiliidae Montenegrina Montenegrina umbilicata
OTU_7189 0 1 0 Mollusca Gastropoda Stylommatophora Camaenidae Rhagada Rhagada angulata
OTU_8077 0 1 0 Mollusca Gastropoda Siphonariida Siphonariidae Siphonaria Siphonaria lessonii
OTU_86 0 1 0 Mollusca Gastropoda Littorinimorpha Hydrobiidae Hauffenia Hauffenia subpiscinalis
OTU_965 0 1 0 Mollusca Bivalvia Galeommatida Galeommatidae Galeomma Galeomma turtoni
UVC_37 0 0 1 Mollusca Bivalvia Mytilida Mytilidae Perna Perna viridis
UVC_38 0 0 1 Mollusca Bivalvia Mytilida Modiolidae Vignadula Vignadula atrata
UVC_15 0 0 1 Mollusca Cephalopoda Sepiida Sepiidae Sepiella Sepiella maindroni de Rochebrune
UVC_16 0 0 1 Mollusca Gastropoda Trochidae Calliostomatidae Tristichotrochus Tristichotrochus unicum
UVC_17 0 0 1 Mollusca Gastropoda Trochidae Trochidae Monodonta Monodonta labio
UVC_18 0 0 1 Mollusca Gastropoda Littorinimorpha Ovulidae Ovulidae sp.
UVC_19 0 0 1 Mollusca Gastropoda Littorinimorpha Ovulidae Cuspivolva Cuspivolva formosa
UVC_20 0 0 1 Mollusca Gastropoda Neogastropoda Buccinidae Cantharus Cantharus cecillei
UVC_21 0 0 1 Mollusca Gastropoda Neogastropoda Cymatiidae Gyrineum Gyrineum natator
UVC_22 0 0 1 Mollusca Gastropoda Neogastropoda Muricidae Chicoreus Chicoreus asianus
UVC_23 0 0 1 Mollusca Gastropoda Neogastropoda Muricidae Reishia Reishia clavigera
UVC_24 0 0 1 Mollusca Gastropoda Neogastropoda Muricidae Reishia Reishia luteostoma
UVC_25 0 0 1 Mollusca Gastropoda Neogastropoda Nassariidae Nassarius Nassarius hepaticus
UVC_26 0 0 1 Mollusca Gastropoda Nudibranchia Nudibranchia sp.
UVC_27 0 0 1 Mollusca Gastropoda Nudibranchia Facelinidae Sakuraeolis Sakuraeolis sakuracea
UVC_28 0 0 1 Mollusca Gastropoda Nudibranchia Dendrodorididae Doriopsilla Doriopsilla sp.
UVC_32 0 0 1 Mollusca Gastropoda Pyramidellidae Odostomia Odostomia subangulata
OTU_7430 1 0 0 Nematoda Chromadorea Strongylida Ancylostomatidae Ancylostoma Ancylostoma ceylanicum
OTU_7275 1 0 0 Nematoda Chromadorea Desmodorida Desmodoridae Metachromadora Metachromadora sp. 2AMA
OTU_13801 1 0 0 Nematoda Chromadorea Rhabditida Rhabditidae Caenorhabditis Caenorhabditis inopinata
OTU_8772 1 0 0 Nemertea Pilidiophora Heteronemertea Baseodiscidae Baseodiscus Baseodiscus sp. 2 SA-2011
OTU_2470 1 0 0 Nemertea Palaeonemertea Tubulanidae Tubulanus Tubulanus polymorphus
OTU_17313 0 1 0 Nemertea Enopla Monostilifera Monostilifera sp. MCZ IZ 45646
OTU_502 0 1 0 Nemertea Enopla Monostilifera Amphiporidae Amphiporus Amphiporus cruentatus
OTU_17155 1 0 0 Phoronida Phoroniformea sp. larval OTU P1
OTU_435 1 1 0 Platyhelminthes Trematoda Diplostomida Diplostomidae Crassiphiala Crassiphiala sp. Lineage 2
OTU_16856 0 1 0 Platyhelminthes Rhabditophora Tricladida Geoplanidae Microplana Microplana sp. MOTU37
OTU_897 1 0 0 Porifera Demospongiae Bubarida Dictyonellidae Scopalina Scopalina lophyropoda
OTU_7359 1 0 0 Porifera Demospongiae Suberitida Halichondriidae Ciocalypta Ciocalypta sp. DE-2012
OTU_8918 1 0 0 Porifera Demospongiae Haplosclerida Niphatidae Amphimedon Amphimedon queenslandica
OTU_7393 1 0 0 Porifera Homoscleromorpha Homosclerophorida Plakinidae Plakina Plakina coerulea
OTU_9873 1 0 0 Porifera Homoscleromorpha Homosclerophorida Plakinidae Plakina Plakina sp. 1
OTU_7613 1 0 0 Porifera Demospongiae Axinellida Raspailiidae Raspailiidae sp. Po.25592
OTU_9606 1 0 0 Porifera Demospongiae Tetractinellida Tetillidae Cinachyrella Cinachyrella alloclada
OTU_10893 0 1 0 Porifera Demospongiae Suberitida Suberitidae Aaptos Aaptos nuda
OTU_15892 0 1 0 Porifera Demospongiae Suberitida Halichondriidae Halichondriidae sp. UCMPWC1015
OTU_16058 0 1 0 Porifera Demospongiae Poecilosclerida Mycalidae Mycale Mycale mirabilis
OTU_16093 0 1 0 Porifera Porifera sp. Sp08
OTU_17151 0 1 0 Porifera Demospongiae Tetractinellida Tetillidae Cinachyrella Cinachyrella australiensis
OTU_2563 0 1 0 Porifera Demospongiae Tethyida Hemiasterellidae Adreus Adreus fascicularis
OTU_5032 0 1 0 Porifera Demospongiae Haplosclerida Chalinidae Haliclona Haliclona sp. P2MK
UVC_35 0 0 1 Porifera Demospongiae Tethyida Tethyidae Tethya Tethya aurantium
UVC_29 0 0 1 Porifera Demospongiae Tethyida Tethyidae Tethya Tethya sp. 1

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Z.Z., Y.L., and K.X.; methodology, W.H., S.X., W.C., and X.L.; software, W.H. and Z.Z.; validation, Z.Z. and K.X.; formal analysis, W.H., S.X., Z.Z., and W.C.; investigation, X.L., Z.Z., S.X., and W.C.; writing—review and editing, Z.Z. and K.X.; visualization, W.H. and Z.Z.; supervision, Z.Z.; project administration, K.X.; funding acquisition, Y.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The raw sequence reads detected by eDNA are deposited in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive database with the BioProjects PRJNA1248872 and PRJNA1248901.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Funding Statement

This research was funded by National Key R&D Program of China, grant number 2022YFC2803800, the National Natural Science Foundation of China, grant number 42176128, the Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, grant number XDB42000000, and Science and Technology Program of Nanji Islands National Marine Nature Reserve Administration, grant numbers and ZJYY-PYCG-2024092001 and JJZB-PYCG-2021112901. The APC was funded by No. 2022YFC2803800.

Footnotes

Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

References

  • 1.Halpern B.S., Frazier M., Afflerbach J., Lowndes J.S., Micheli F., O’Hara C., Scarborough C., Selkoe K.A. Recent Pace of Change in Human Impact on the World’s Ocean. Sci. Rep. 2019;9:11609. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-47201-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Chung A., Kam Y.C., Shea S.K.H., Schunter C. Detecting Fish Diversity in Urban-Impacted Ecosystems: A Comparative Approach of eDNA Metabarcoding and UVC. Environ. DNA. 2024;6:e70048. doi: 10.1002/edn3.70048. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Stat M., Huggett M.J., Bernasconi R., DiBattista J.D., Berry T.E., Newman S.J., Harvey E.S., Bunce M. Ecosystem Biomonitoring with eDNA: Metabarcoding across the Tree of Life in a Tropical Marine Environment. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:12240. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-12501-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Jardim V.L., Grall J., Barros-Barreto M.B., Bizien A., Benoit T., Braga J.C., Brodie J., Burel T., Cabrito A., Diaz-Pulido G., et al. Common Terminology to Unify Research and Conservation of Coralline Algae and the Habitats They Create. Aquat. Conserv. 2025;35:e70121. doi: 10.1002/aqc.70121. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Deiner K., Bik H.M., Mächler E., Seymour M., Lacoursière-Roussel A., Altermatt F., Creer S., Bista I., Lodge D.M., De Vere N., et al. Environmental DNA Metabarcoding: Transforming How We Survey Animal and Plant Communities. Mol. Ecol. 2017;26:5872–5895. doi: 10.1111/mec.14350. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Taberlet P., Coissac E., Pompanon F., Brochmann C., Willerslev E. Towards Next-generation Biodiversity Assessment Using DNA Metabarcoding. Mol. Ecol. 2012;21:2045–2050. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2012.05470.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Djurhuus A., Closek C.J., Kelly R.P., Pitz K.J., Michisaki R.P., Starks H.A., Walz K.R., Andruszkiewicz E.A., Olesin E., Hubbard K., et al. Environmental DNA Reveals Seasonal Shifts and Potential Interactions in a Marine Community. Nat. Commun. 2020;11:254. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-14105-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.West K.M., Stat M., Harvey E.S., Skepper C.L., DiBattista J.D., Richards Z.T., Travers M.J., Newman S.J., Bunce M. eDNA Metabarcoding Survey Reveals Fine-scale Coral Reef Community Variation across a Remote, Tropical Island Ecosystem. Mol. Ecol. 2020;29:1069–1086. doi: 10.1111/mec.15382. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Cai H. Brief Introduction to Nanji Islands National Marine Nature Reserve. China Ocean Press; Beijing, China: 2021. pp. 1–19. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Jessop S.A., Saunders B.J., Goetze J.S., Harvey E.S. A comparison of underwater visual census, baited, diver operated and remotely operated stereo-video for sampling shallow water reef fishes. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 2022;276:108017. doi: 10.1016/j.ecss.2022.108017. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Suominen S., Provoost P., Principe S., Boulanger E., Burrows M.T., Campoy A.N., Costello M.J., Earl C., Gante H.F., Gillard E., et al. Engaging Communities to Safeguard Ocean Life: UNESCO Environmental DNA Expeditions. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization; Paris, France: 2024. p. 9. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Leray M., Yang J.Y., Meyer C.P., Mills S.C., Agudelo N., Ranwez V., Boehm J.T., Machida R.J. A New Versatile Primer Set Targeting a Short Fragment of the Mitochondrial COI Region for Metabarcoding Metazoan Diversity: Application for Characterizing Coral Reef Fish Gut Contents. Front. Zool. 2013;10:34. doi: 10.1186/1742-9994-10-34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Geller J., Meyer C., Parker M., Hawk H. Redesign of PCR Primers for Mitochondrial Cytochrome c Oxidase Subunit I for Marine Invertebrates and Application in All-Taxa Biotic Surveys. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 2013;13:851–861. doi: 10.1111/1755-0998.12138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Callahan B.J., McMurdie P.J., Rosen M.J., Han A.W., Johnson A.J.A., Holmes S.P. DADA2: High-Resolution Sample Inference from Illumina Amplicon Data. Nat. Methods. 2016;13:581–583. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3869. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Beermann A.J., Zizka V.M.A., Elbrecht V., Baranov V., Leese F. DNA Metabarcoding Reveals the Complex and Hidden Responses of Chironomids to Multiple Stressors. Environ. Sci. Eur. 2018;30:26. doi: 10.1186/s12302-018-0157-x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Steinke D., Braukmann T.W., Manerus L., Woodhouse A., Elbrecht V. Effects of Malaise Trap Spacing on Species Richness and Composition of Terrestrial Arthropod Bulk Samples. Metabarcoding Metagenom. 2021;5:e59201. doi: 10.3897/mbmg.5.59201. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Di Capua I., Piredda R., Mazzocchi M.G., Zingone A. Metazoan Diversity and Seasonality through eDNA Metabarcoding at a Mediterranean Long-Term Ecological Research Site. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 2021;78:3303–3316. doi: 10.1093/icesjms/fsab059. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ginestet C. Ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. A Stat. Soc. 2011;174:245–246. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-985X.2010.00676_9.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Turner C.R., Uy K.L., Everhart R.C. Fish Environmental DNA Is More Concentrated in Aquatic Sediments than Surface Water. Biol. Conserv. 2015;183:93–102. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2014.11.017. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Buxton A.S., Groombridge J.J., Griffiths R.A. Seasonal Variation in Environmental DNA Detection in Sediment and Water Samples. PLoS ONE. 2018;13:e0191737. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191737. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Collins R.A., Wangensteen O.S., O’Gorman E.J., Mariani S., Sims D.W., Genner M.J. Persistence of Environmental DNA in Marine Systems. Commun. Biol. 2018;1:185. doi: 10.1038/s42003-018-0192-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Nevers M.B., Przybyla-Kelly K., Shively D., Morris C.C., Dickey J., Byappanahalli M.N. Influence of Sediment and Stream Transport on Detecting a Source of Environmental DNA. PLoS ONE. 2020;15:e0244086. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Brandt M.I., Pradillon F., Trouche B., Henry N., Liautard-Haag C., Cambon-Bonavita M.-A., Cueff-Gauchard V., Wincker P., Belser C., Poulain J., et al. Evaluating Sediment and Water Sampling Methods for the Estimation of Deep-Sea Biodiversity Using Environmental DNA. Sci. Rep. 2021;11:7856. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-86396-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Ogata M., Masuda R., Harino H., Sakata M.K., Hatakeyama M., Yokoyama K., Yamashita Y., Minamoto T. Environmental DNA Preserved in Marine Sediment for Detecting Jellyfish Blooms after a Tsunami. Sci. Rep. 2021;11:16830. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-94286-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Suzzi A.L., Huggett M.J., Gaston T.F., MacFarlane G.R., Alam M.R., Gibb J., Stat M. eDNA Metabarcoding Reveals Shifts in Sediment Eukaryote Communities in a Metal Contaminated Estuary. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2023;191:114896. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2023.114896. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Roblet S., Priouzeau F., Gambini G., Cottalorda J.-M., Gastaldi J.M., Pey A., Raybaud V., Suarez G.R., Serre C., Sabourault C., et al. From Sight to Sequence: Underwater Visual Census vs Environmental DNA Metabarcoding for the Monitoring of Taxonomic and Functional Fish Diversity. Sci. Total Environ. 2024;956:177250. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.177250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The raw sequence reads detected by eDNA are deposited in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive database with the BioProjects PRJNA1248872 and PRJNA1248901.


Articles from Biology are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES