Table 3.
Advantages and disadvantages of radiological and pathological assessments of ENE
| Radiological assessment | Pathological assessment | |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Patient selection | Performed in all patients, irrespective of age, coexisting morbidity, cancer stage or treatment | Performed in surgical candidates with operable disease |
| 2. Nodal coverage | All nodes/nodal groups | Variability in the amount of tissue available and the number of nodes sampled |
| 3. Technique | Variability in imaging modalities and protocols, including slice thickness | Variability in slide preparation for histological assessment, including slice thickness and orientation |
| 4. Selection of nodes for ENE assessment | Variability in the selection of nodes: all nodes, largest node or node with the most extensive iENE | Variability in the selection of nodes: all nodes, largest node or node with the most extensive pENE |
| 5. Analysis | Multiplanar reconstruction of any node | Confined to the plane and node/amount of the node in the prepared sample |
| 6. Criteria/grades of ENE | Variability in the selection criteria: single criterion, two or more criteria, combinations of criteria, likelihood scores and observer impression. Criteria diluted by non-iENE criteria such as necrosis |
Variability in the selection criteria: microscopic versus macroscopic, direct measurements or grading one criterion, two or more criteria and combinations of criteria |
| 7. Observer variation | Intra- and inter-observer variation | Intra- and inter-observer variation |
| 8. Review of data source | Review of images is readily available within and across centres | Review of histology samples may not be readily available, especially across centres and for large sample sizes; therefore, studies frequently rely on retrospective reviews of reports |
| 9. Radiological–pathological correlation |
|
|
ENE, extranodal extension; iENE, imaging extranodal extension; pENE, pathological extranodal extension.