Table 5.

Modified Downs and Black scores of cohort and one-off measurement with variables studies

Study	% score	Quality	Study	% score	Quality
Austin et al. [85]	65%	Fair	Narimatsu et al. [77]	74%	Good
Barnes-Wood et al. [86]	67%	Fair	Naunheim et al. [95]	61%	Fair
Becker et al. [68]	72%	Good	Nevins et al. [46]	68%	Fair
Brooks et al. [69]	76%	Good	Peek et al. [78]	90%	Good
Caccese et al. [70]	88%	Good	Pereira et al. [79]	85%	Good
Chrisman et al. [44]	79%	Good	Pritchard et al. [47]	61%	Fair
den Hollander and Gouttebarge [71]	78%	Good	Robinson [101]	47%	Poor
Dorminy et al. [87]	55%	Fair	Sandmo et al. [96]	63%	Fair
Filben et al. [72]	83%	Good	Saunders et al. [48]	68%	Fair
Filben et al. [73]	72%	Good	Self et al. [97]	53%	Fair
Filben et al. [45]	78%	Good	Segars et al. [49]	67%	Fair
Filben et al. [88]	67%	Fair	Shewchenko et al. [80]	76%	Good
Hanlon and Bir [89]	56%	Fair	Shewchenko et al. [98]	59%	Fair
Harriss et al. [90]	67%	Fair	Sokol-Randell et al. [81]	78%	Good
Kalichova and Lukasek [91]	55%	Fair	Stelzer-Hiller et al. [102]	39%	Poor
Kenny et al. [74]	72%	Good	Stucker [82]	88%	Good
Lamond et al. [75]	83%	Good	Tierney et al. [83]	74%	Good
Larson [92]	68%	Fair	Tomblin et al. [84]	88%	Good
Liberi [93]	53%	Fair	Wang [99]	60%	Fair
Lukasek and Kalichova [94]	68%	Fair	Withnall et al. [100]	67%	Fair
Miller et al. [76]	83%	Good