Skip to main content
. 2025 Jul 26;15:27232. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-12142-z

Table 2.

The accurate fitness value for different optimization techniques for the test images.

Image Pepper Camera man
K = 2 K = 3 K = 4 K = 5 K = 2 K = 3 K = 4 K = 5
GAAOA 2862.6 3071.8 3187.3 3201.3 3661.1 3743.2 3788.1 3826.7
EMO Lévy 2858.5 3059.9 3145.7 3189.8 3646.6 3721.8 3778.2 3809.4
EMO 2857.5 3059.8 3144.8 3189.4 3646.5 3721 3777.4 3809.4
CS 2861.1 3059.9 3145.7 3189.7 3643.6 3718.7 3774.5 3805.7
SCA 2324.5 2550.4 2537.9 2603.8 3515.8 3680.5 3749.18 3718.18
MFO 2435.5 2574.7 2647.67 2669.47 3643.31 3720.25 3748.75 3758.72
WOA 2433.36 2493.18 2632.9 2682.01 3649.36 3690.11 3760.5 3795.86
Image Baboon
K = 2 K = 3 K = 4 K = 5
GAAOA 1559.7 1551.6 1611.2 1642.1
EMO Lévy 1558.6 1539.2 1601.4 1628.9
EMO 1542.5 1532.7 1592.6 1617.2
CS 1543.9 1539.2 1582.6 1623.6
SCA 1587.5 1546.3 1562.4 1595.2
MFO 1621.4 1541.2 1588.2 1610.5
WOA 1632.3 1530.3 1590.1 1621.4

Significant values are in bold.