Skip to main content
. 2025 Jul 26;15:27232. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-12142-z

Table 6.

Comparative study between fitness value, thresholds, and PSNR for low-contrast image (Camera man) for different optimization techniques.

Image Fitness value Thresholds PSNR
K = 2 K = 3 K = 4 K = 5 K = 2 K = 3 K = 4 K = 5 K = 2 K = 3 K = 4 K = 5
GAAOA Lévy 1.15e+3 1.181e+3 1.21e+3 1.26e+3 53.92 37.22 32.23 34.23 22.61 25.21 26.11 28.12
EMO Lévy 1.15e+3 1.18e+3 1.199e+3 1.23e+3 52.95 35.68. 31.66 29.53 21.48 24.56 25.62 27.31
EMO 1.15e+3 1.18e+3 1.191e+3 1.21e+3 52.94 34.69. 34.68 33.67 21.34 24.43 25.55 25.78
CS 1.15e+3 1.18e+03 1.189e+3 1.12e+3 52.93 34.67 34.68 32.65 21.48 24.56 25.62 26.84
SCA 1.14e+3 1.17e+3 1.184e+3 1.119e+3 52.34 34.13 34.21 32.28 21.16 24.23 25.41 26.23
MFO 1.13e+3 1.169e+3 1.183e+3 1.114e+3 52.22 34.01 33.97 32.11 21.02 24.12 25.22 26.12
WOA 1.13e+3 1.167e+3 a.a81e+3 1.111 e+3 51.87 33.87 33.67 32.01 20.97 23.89 25.12 25.76