Skip to main content
PMC home page
CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal logoLink to CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal
. 1999 Feb 9;160(3):337–341.

Screening Mammography Program of British Columbia: pattern of use and health care system costs

I A Olivotto 1, L Kan 1, D Mates 1, S King 1
PMCID: PMC1230035  PMID: 10065075

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The use of mammography for screening asymptomatic women has increased dramatically in the past decade. This report describes the changes that have occurred in the use of bilateral mammography in British Columbia since the provincial breast cancer screening program began in 1988. METHODS: Using province-wide databases from both the breast cancer screening program and the provincial health insurance plan in BC, the authors determined the number and costs of bilateral mammography services for women aged 40 years or older between Apr. 1, 1986, and Mar. 31, 1997. Unilateral mammography was excluded because it is used for investigating symptomatic disease and screening abnormalities, and for follow-up of women who have undergone mastectomy for cancer. RESULTS: As the provincial breast cancer screening program expanded from 1 site in 1988 to 23 in 1997, it provided an increasing proportion of the bilateral mammographic examinations carried out each year in BC. In fiscal year 1996/97, 65% of bilateral mammographic examinations were performed through the screening program. The cost per examination within the screening program dropped as volume increased. Thirty percent more bilateral mammography examinations were done in 1996/97 than in 1991/92, but health care system expenditures for these services increased by only 4% during the same period. In calendar year 1996, 21% of new breast cancers were diagnosed as a result of a screening program visit. INTERPRETATION: Substantial increases in health care expenditures have been avoided by shifting bilateral mammography services to the provincial screening program, which has a lower cost per screening visit.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (125.8 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Breen N., Kessler L. Changes in the use of screening mammography: evidence from the 1987 and 1990 National Health Interview Surveys. Am J Public Health. 1994 Jan;84(1):62–67. doi: 10.2105/ajph.84.1.62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Chu K. C., Tarone R. E., Kessler L. G., Ries L. A., Hankey B. F., Miller B. A., Edwards B. K. Recent trends in U.S. breast cancer incidence, survival, and mortality rates. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1996 Nov 6;88(21):1571–1579. doi: 10.1093/jnci/88.21.1571. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Clay M. G., Hislop T. G., Kan L., Olivotto I. A., Burhenne L. J. Screening mammography in British Columbia: 1988-1993. Am J Surg. 1994 May;167(5):490–492. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(94)90241-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Gaudette L. A., Altmayer C. A., Nobrega K. M., Lee J. Trends in mammography utilization, 1981 to 1994. Health Rep. 1996 Winter;8(3):17–30(Fre). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Goel V. Whose guidelines are they, anyway? Mammography utilization in Ontario. Can J Public Health. 1996 May-Jun;87(3):181–182. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hendrick R. E., Smith R. A., Rutledge J. H., 3rd, Smart C. R. Benefit of screening mammography in women aged 40-49: a new meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 1997;(22):87–92. doi: 10.1093/jncimono/1997.22.87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hislop T. G., Worth A. J., Kan L., Rousseau E. Post screen-detected breast cancer within the Screening Mammography Program of British Columbia. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1997 Feb;42(3):235–242. doi: 10.1023/a:1005793707549. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kerlikowske K. Efficacy of screening mammography among women aged 40 to 49 years and 50 to 69 years: comparison of relative and absolute benefit. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 1997;(22):79–86. doi: 10.1093/jncimono/1997.22.79. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kerlikowske K., Grady D., Rubin S. M., Sandrock C., Ernster V. L. Efficacy of screening mammography. A meta-analysis. JAMA. 1995 Jan 11;273(2):149–154. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Libstug A. R., Moravan V., Aitken S. E. Results from the Ontario breast screening program, 1990-1995. J Med Screen. 1998;5(2):73–80. doi: 10.1136/jms.5.2.73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Nordén T., Thurfjell E., Hasselgren M., Lindgren A., Norgren A., Bergström R., Holmberg L. Mammographic screening for breast cancer. What cancers do we find? Eur J Cancer. 1997 Apr;33(4):624–628. doi: 10.1016/s0959-8049(96)00482-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Nyström L., Rutqvist L. E., Wall S., Lindgren A., Lindqvist M., Rydén S., Andersson I., Bjurstam N., Fagerberg G., Frisell J. Breast cancer screening with mammography: overview of Swedish randomised trials. Lancet. 1993 Apr 17;341(8851):973–978. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(93)91067-v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Sickles E. A. Breast cancer screening outcomes in women ages 40-49: clinical experience with service screening using modern mammography. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 1997;(22):99–104. doi: 10.1093/jncimono/1997.22.99. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Tabàr L., Fagerberg G., Duffy S. W., Day N. E., Gad A., Gröntoft O. Update of the Swedish two-county program of mammographic screening for breast cancer. Radiol Clin North Am. 1992 Jan;30(1):187–210. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Taves D. H., McCurdy L. I., Sparrow R. K. The relative diagnostic impact of screening mammography and physical examination. Can Assoc Radiol J. 1996 Aug;47(4):257–259. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from CMAJ: Canadian Medical Association Journal are provided here courtesy of Canadian Medical Association

RESOURCES