Table 4.
Result of the quality assessment of the included studies.
| 3A.) JBI critical appraisal checklist for qualitative studies | ||
|---|---|---|
| Study | Criteriaa 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
Total/10 |
| Backmann et al. (40) | + + + + + − − + + + | 8/10 |
| Hamiduzzaman et al. (43) | + + + + + − − + + + | 8/10 |
| Jacobsen et al. (44) | + + + + + − + + + + | 9/10 |
| Lynch et al. (45) | + + + + + − − + + + | 8/10 |
| Rokstad et al. (46) | + + + + + + + − + − | 8/10 |
| Røsvik &Mjørud (48) | + + + + + − − + + + | 8/10 |
(1) Congruity between stated philosophical perspective and the research methodology. (2) Congruity between research methodology and research question. (3) Congruity between research methodology and methods for collecting data. (4) Congruity between research methodology and the representation of the analysis. (5). Congruity between research methodology and the interpretation of results. (6) Statement locating the researcher culturally or theoretically. (7) Influence of the researcher on the research and vice-versa addressed (8). Participants and their voices adequately represented (9). Is the research ethical according to current criteria or, evidence of ethical approval by an appropriate body. (10) The conclusion drawn from the analysis or interpretation of the data.