Skip to main content
Molecules and Cells logoLink to Molecules and Cells
letter
. 2025 May 29;48(8):100234. doi: 10.1016/j.mocell.2025.100234

Brief guide to gene cloning

Woojin Hong 1, Seokjun G Ha 1, Hyunwoo C Kwon 1, Seung-Jae V Lee 1,
PMCID: PMC12302143  PMID: 40449799

Abstract

Analysis and manipulation of DNA is fundamental to understand gene function and expression. Gene cloning is a routine and versatile technique for molecular biology, allowing isolation, amplification, and production of recombinant DNA molecules. Here, we provide an overall process, various types, and applications of gene cloning. This concise guide will be useful for researchers who are unfamiliar with gene cloning, focusing on key principles and experimental considerations for efficient DNA analysis.

Keywords: Cloning, Ligation, Restriction enzyme, Selection, Transformation

INTRODUCTION

The ability to analyze and manipulate DNA is crucial for understanding the structure, function, and expression of genes. Advances in molecular biology techniques, including gene cloning, polymerase chain reaction (PCR), sequencing, and genome editing, have substantially contributed to the study of individual gene regulation, as well as various applications in medicine and industry (Abdellaoui et al., 2023, Bae et al., 2023, Heo et al., 2023, Jeong et al., 2023, Lee et al., 2024).

Among the DNA manipulation techniques, gene cloning remains an essential tool because of its versatility, reliability, and cost-effectiveness (Han et al., 2023, Kim et al., 2024a, Kim et al., 2024b, Kim et al., 2025, Lee et al., 2023, Nguyen et al., 2023, Sharma et al., 2014). Gene cloning is a technique that assembles the gene of interest into recombinant DNA molecules and replicates them in a host organism (Lodge et al., 2007). Here, we provide an overview of gene cloning, focusing on fundamental cloning steps, commonly used methods, and applications in molecular biology. By summarizing key principles and experimental considerations, this guide will serve as a valuable resource for scientists who employ gene cloning in their research.

MAIN BODY

Overview

The detailed protocol for gene cloning varies depending on the starting material. Genomic DNA (gDNA) can be isolated from cells or tissues by employing chemical, enzymatic, or mechanical lysis (Patil et al., 2022), whereas complementary DNA (cDNA) is reverse-transcribed DNA from messenger RNA (mRNA) (Harbers, 2008). Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is used to amplify the insert DNA. Melting temperatures, the percentage of guanine (G) and cytosine (C) bases, the lengths of oligonucleotides, and secondary structures are the core parameters that ensure successful PCR primer design (Chen et al., 2002). Additionally, codon optimization is also an important element for improving the expression levels of recombinant DNA molecules because of variations in codon usage among different species (Menzella, 2011).

DNA vector is a type of storage system that can replicate autonomously within host cells, usually bacteria, such as Escherichia coli. Generally, the DNA vector has three characteristics: origin of replication (Ori), selectable marker, and multicloning site (Carter et al., 2022, Clark and Pazdernik, 2012) (Fig. 1A). In addition, the stability and efficiency of gene delivery depend on the insert size. Once the recombinant DNA is transferred to the host cells, the copy number and promoter strength of the vector determine replicon amplification (Preston, 2003).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Overview of gene cloning workflow. (A) Insert and vector preparation. Genomic DNA (gDNA) and complementary DNA (cDNA) that is reverse-transcribed from messenger RNA (mRNA) are two major types of inserts. The vector usually consists of the origin of replication (Ori), selectable marker, and multicloning site (MCS). (B) Recombination. The insert and the vector molecules are incorporated to generate recombinants. Ligation-dependent cloning methods include traditional cloning, Golden gate assembly, and TA cloning. Traditional cloning utilizes restriction enzymes and DNA ligase for recombination. In the Golden gate assembly, type IIS restriction enzyme digests the sequence distant from the recognition sites, followed by DNA ligase-mediated ligation. TA cloning recombines a T-tailed vector with an A-tailed insert. Ligation-independent cloning methods include Gibson assembly and Gateway cloning. In Gibson assembly, two or more DNA fragments with overlapping homologous ends are incorporated into a single vector. In Gateway cloning, site-specific recombination occurs between attachment (att) sequences during two steps: the BP reaction generates an entry clone by replacing the ccdB gene in the donor vector, and the LR reaction produces an expression clone by recombining the entry clone with a destination vector. (C) Transformation and selection. The recombinant DNA molecules are transformed into competent cells with heat shock or electroporation. Various selection methods are used to identify successfully transformed cells, including antibiotic resistance, blue-white screening, colony polymerase chain reaction (PCR), restriction mapping, and Sanger sequencing.

The obtained insert and vector DNA molecules are incorporated to generate recombinants. The recombination step can be classified into traditional ligation-dependent and ligation-independent processes (Ashwini et al., 2016, Yao et al., 2016). Here, we provide three types of ligation-dependent cloning methods and two types of ligation-independent cloning methods. Proper methods can be utilized depending on aims and characteristics of inserts and vectors (Fig. 1B, Table 1).

Table 1.

Features of various types of gene cloning

Ligation-dependent cloning
Ligation-independent cloning
Traditional cloning Golden gate assembly TA cloning Gibson assembly Gateway cloning
Restriction enzyme required Yes Yes (type IIS) No No No
Insert preparation Restriction enzyme digestion PCR to generate A-tailed insert PCR to generate overlapping homologous ends PCR to generate att-flanked sequence
Vector preparation Restriction enzyme digestion Linearization to generate T-tailed vector Linearization to generate overlapping homologous ends Using donor vector and destination vector
Recombination Ligation between 5′ and 3′ ends using DNA ligase Assembly between overlapping homologous sequences Site-specific recombination between att sites

PCR, polymerase chain reaction; att sites, attachment sites

After the inserts are incorporated into the vectors, the recombinant DNA molecules are introduced to competent bacterial cells via transformation (Johnston et al., 2014). Bacillus subtilis, Streptococcus pneumonia, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, and Haemophilus influenzae exhibit natural competence (Das and Dash, 2015). For other bacterial strains, including E. coli, additional work is required to generate competent cells. Heat shock and electroporation are two representative methods (Fig. 1C). The heat shock method is relatively economical and easy to perform in laboratories. Electroporation is approximately 10 times more effective than heat shock methods. However, specialized equipment, such as electroporators and cuvettes, is required (Chang et al., 2017, Das and Dash, 2015, Green and Sambrook, 2021, Kotnik et al., 2015, Warren, 2011). Researchers need to choose proper methods depending on aims and expected results.

Transformed bacterial cells are usually cultured on semisolid agar plates (Bertero et al., 2017). Screening whether the colonies contain the recombinant DNA and the orientation of the insert is correct is important for successful gene cloning. Antibiotic resistance is the simplest way to identify the presence of recombinant DNA molecules because, as mentioned above, one of the most important characteristics of vectors is the existence of a selectable marker. Blue-white screening is a method that utilizes the expression of the lacZ gene in E. coli (Das and Dash, 2015, Lodge et al., 2007). Colony PCR, restriction mapping, and Sanger sequencing are more direct and accurate methods to select transformants. For detailed principles and protocols, researchers can consult other resources (Andreou, 2013, Bertero et al., 2017, Jacobus and Gross, 2015, Goranson and Erbe, 2003) (Fig. 1C).

Cloning

Ligation-dependent cloning

For traditional ligation-dependent cloning, restriction enzymes recognize unique sites that have palindromic sequences, called recognition sites (Pelley, 2011). Researchers need to consider several criteria to choose the most appropriate restriction enzymes: fragment size, resulting ends of the cleavage, and methylation sensitivity (Brown, 2020, Carter et al., 2022, Robinson et al., 2004). After restriction enzyme digestion, vector and the insert DNA fragments are joined together (Fig. 1B). DNA ligase catalyzes the reformation of covalent phosphodiester bond between 5′-phosphyl group on one end and 3′-hydroxyl group at the other end. T4 DNA ligase and E. coli DNA ligase are the two most common reagents (Shi et al., 2018, Shuman, 2009, Wilkinson et al., 2005).

Golden gate assembly is a one step, one-pot cloning method that is based on the type IIS restriction enzymes (Engler et al., 2008, Engler and Marillonnet, 2014, Hsu and Smanski, 2018). The type IIS restriction enzymes, such as BsaI, BsmBI, and BbsI, cleave the sequence distance from the recognition sites. In addition, the original restriction sites are not present after the ligation, allowing seamless cloning (Ashwini et al., 2016, Bird et al., 2022, Pingoud et al., 2005). Golden gate assembly is simpler than traditional restriction enzyme digestion and ligation cloning in that it enables the incorporation of multiple fragments simultaneously (Kirchmaier et al., 2013, Weber et al., 2011). Moreover, the likelihood of further digestion by restriction enzyme and self-ligation of the vector is lower because the recognition sites are removed after the cleavage, and the ends are incompatible with each other (Luo et al., 2018).

TA cloning is one of the simplest and most commonly used form of PCR cloning methods (Zhou and Gomez-Sanchez, 2000). The terminal transferase activity of DNA polymerase adds a single deoxyadenosine (dA) residue at the 3' ends of the insert DNA fragments. The PCR-amplified products are then ligated with linearized T-vector, which has single-stranded T overhangs at the 3′ ends (Bertero et al., 2017, Clark and Pazdernik, 2012, Yao et al., 2016). In particular, TA cloning is useful when compatible recognition sites are not available in the insert and vector DNA molecules. In addition, minor modification, such as hemi-phosphorylation of both A-tailed inserts and T-tailed vectors, ensures unidirectional cloning (Maheshwari et al., 2022).

Ligation-independent cloning

Gibson assembly is an isothermal, single-reaction method to assemble multiple overlapping DNA fragments (Gibson et al., 2009). This process is achieved by adding homologous sequence at each end of the DNA fragments that are to be cloned (Avilan, 2023, Bertero et al., 2017, Wang et al., 2015). (Fig. 1B). The reagents for Gibson assembly are available from New England Biolabs (Gibson, 2011). The researchers can utilize other commercial cloning kits based on a similar principle, such as In-Fusion HD Cloning, GeneArt Seamless Cloning and Assembly, and Cold Fusion Cloning (Celie et al., 2016). Gibson assembly facilitates simple and efficient gene cloning (Chen et al., 2025). Moreover, additional modification enables researchers to assemble large DNA fragments with high GC contents (Li et al., 2018).

Gateway cloning is based on site-specific recombination used by bacteriophage lambda to integrate its DNA into the E. coli genome. Two sets of reversible reactions are performed in this method (Magnani et al., 2006). For the BP reaction, the insert fragments are incorporated into a donor vector to generate an entry clone. Next, the LR reaction is a process of constructing an expression clone by combining the entry clone with the destination vector (Ashwini et al., 2016, Clark and Pazdernik, 2012, Hartley et al., 2000). The BP and LR reactions are mediated by recombination between specific attachment (att) sites, during which the toxic ccdB gene in the donor or destination vector is replaced by the insert DNA, allowing only correctly recombined clones to survive (Bachman, 2013, Reece-Hoyes and Walhout, 2018, Walhout et al., 2000). Once an entry clone is generated, Gateway cloning allows large-scale cloning into various types of destination vectors in a standardized manner (Luo et al., 2018). In addition, multisite Gateway cloning enables researchers to assemble multiple insert DNA fragments into a single construct in a definite order and orientation (Sasaki et al., 2004).

Applications

Site-directed mutagenesis

Site-directed mutagenesis is a molecular biological technique to introduce specific nucleotide changes into the gene of interest, allowing the study of structure-function relationships, genome modifications, and/or protein interactions (Bachman, 2013, Carrigan et al., 2011, Goutam et al., 2024, Kim et al., 2023, Um et al., 2023, Zhang et al., 2021). Among various methods, PCR-based site-directed mutagenesis is widely used to yield mutations, including substitutions, insertions, or deletions. (Lee et al., 2010, Lodge et al., 2007, Wong, 2006). Advances in PCR-based mutagenesis, such as overlap extension PCR, inverse PCR, and megaprimer PCR, exhibit high efficiency and facilitate mutagenesis of large DNA fragments (Zawaira et al., 2012).

DNA library

DNA library is a collection of randomly fragmented DNA molecules that are cloned and/or screened for typical phenotypes (Patil et al., 2022). The genomic library consists of DNA fragments that represent an organism’s entire genome, and is mainly used to analyze genetic mutation as well as for genome sequencing or genome mapping (Clark and Pazdernik, 2012, Singh et al., 2021). For the cDNA library, total RNAs extracted from biological samples are reverse-transcribed using oligo(dT) primers (Harbers, 2008, Nam et al., 2002). The cDNA library is used to identify gene expression patterns in a typical cell type or tissue. Moreover, a labeled cDNA library can also be utilized to compare transcriptomic changes in various diseases (Brown, 2020, Imdad et al., 2024).

CONCLUDING REMARKS

This MiniResource provides a brief overview of gene cloning for DNA analysis and manipulation, from the overall process and different methods for recombination to applications. Each cloning strategy has its respective strengths and limitations. Traditional ligation-dependent cloning methods rely on restriction enzyme digestion and ligation, allowing cost-effective cloning, but are restricted by the availability of restriction sites. Ligation-independent cloning methods offer advanced, seamless, and high-throughput assembly, particularly for assembling multiple fragments, but are often limited by time-consuming primer design or the use of costly reagents (Ashwini et al., 2016, Lodge et al., 2007). Researchers need to choose and modify proper methods depending on the characteristics of DNA molecules and aims. For more comprehensive guidelines, users are encouraged to refer to additional publications, particularly detailed protocols of various gene cloning methods (Brown, 2020, Engler and Marillonnet, 2014, Gibson, 2011, Green and Sambrook, 2012, Maheshwari et al., 2022, Reece-Hoyes and Walhout, 2018).

FUNDING AND SUPPORT

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea grant funded by the Korea government (MSIT) (RS-2024-00408712) to S.J.V.L.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

W. H., S.G.H., H.C.K., and S-J.V.L. wrote the manuscript.

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Woojin Hong: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft, Conceptualization. Seung-Jae V. Lee: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft, Conceptualization. Seokjun G. Ha: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft, Conceptualization. Hyunwoo C. Kwon: Writing – review & editing, Conceptualization.

Declaration of generative AI and AI-assisted technologies in the writing process

During the preparation of this work the authors used ChatGPT 4o (OpenAI) in order to improve language clarity of the manuscript. After using this tool, the authors reviewed and edited the content as needed and take full responsibility for the content of the publication.

DECLARATION OF COMPETING INTERESTS

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank all Lee laboratory members for their helpful discussion and comments. Declaration of Competing Interests The authors have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.

REFERENCES

  1. Abdellaoui N., Kim S.Y., Kim M.S. Effect of TRAF6-knockout on gene expression and lncRNA expression in Epithelioma papulosum cyprini (EPC) cells. Anim. Cells. Syst. 2023;27:197–207. doi: 10.1080/19768354.2023.2263070. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Andreou L.-V. Isolation of plasmid DNA from bacteria. Methods Enzymol. 2013;529:135–142. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-418687-3.00010-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ashwini M., Murugan S.B., Balamurugan S., Sathishkumar R. Advances in molecular cloning. Mol. Biol. 2016;50:1–6. doi: 10.7868/S0026898416010134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Avilan L. In: DNA manipulation and analysis. Scarlett G., editor. Humana Press; New York, NY: 2023. Assembling multiple fragments: the Gibson Assembly; pp. 45–53. [Google Scholar]
  5. Bachman J. Site-directed mutagenesis. Methods Enzymol. 2013;529:241–248. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-418687-3.00019-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bae S.G., Kim H.J., Kim M.Y., Kim D.D.H., Shin S.I., Ahn J.S., Park J. Identification of cell type-specific effects of DNMT3A mutations on relapse in acute myeloid leukemia. Mol. Cells. 2023;46:611–626. doi: 10.14348/molcells.2023.0093. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bertero A., Brown S., Vallier L. In: Basic science methods for clinical researchers. Jalali M., Saldanha F.Y.L., Jalali M., editors. Academic Press; London, UK: 2017. Methods of cloning; pp. 19–39. [Google Scholar]
  8. Bird J.E., Marles-Wright J., Giachino A. A user’s guide to golden gate cloning methods and standards. ACS Synth. Biol. 2022;11:3551–3563. doi: 10.1021/acssynbio.2c00355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Brown T.A. John Wiley & Sons; Hoboken, NJ: 2020. Gene cloning and DNA analysis: an introduction. [Google Scholar]
  10. Carter M., Essner R., Goldstein N., Iyer M. Academic Press; London, UK: 2022. Guide to research techniques in neuroscience. [Google Scholar]
  11. Carrigan P.E., Ballar P., Tuzmen S. In: Disease gene identification: methods and protocols. DisStefano J.K., Taverna D.M., editors. Humana Press; Phoenix, AZ: 2011. Site-directed mutagenesis; pp. 107–124. [Google Scholar]
  12. Celie P.H., Parret A.H., Perrakis A. Recombinant cloning strategies for protein expression. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2016;38:145–154. doi: 10.1016/j.sbi.2016.06.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Chang A.Y., Chau V., Landas J.A., Pang Y. Preparation of calcium competent Escherichia coli and heat-shock transformation. J. Exp. Microbiol. Immunol. 2017;1:22–25. [Google Scholar]
  14. Chen B.-Y., Janes H.W., Chen S. In: PCR cloning protocols. Chen B.-Y., Janes H.W., editors. Humana Press; Totowa, NJ: 2002. Computer programs for PCR primer design and analysis; pp. 19–29. [Google Scholar]
  15. Chen Y.-N., Cui Y.-Z., Chen X.-R., Wang J.-Y., Li B.-Z., Yuan Y.-J. Direct cloning strategies for large genomic fragments: a review. Biotechnol. Adv. 2025;79 doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2024.108494. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Clark D.P., Pazdernik N.J. Academic Press; Waltham, MA: 2012. Molecular biology. [Google Scholar]
  17. Das S., Dash H.R. Springer; New Delhi, India: 2015. Microbial biotechnology - a laboratory manual for bacterial systems. [Google Scholar]
  18. Engler C., Kandzia R., Marillonnet S. A one pot, one step, precision cloning method with high throughput capability. PLoS One. 2008;3 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003647. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Engler C., Marillonnet S. In: DNA cloning and assembly methods. Valla S., Lale R., editors. Humana Press; New York, NY: 2014. Golden gate cloning; pp. 119–131. [Google Scholar]
  20. Gibson D.G. Enzymatic assembly of overlapping DNA fragments. Methods Enzymol. 2011;498:349–361. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-385120-8.00015-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Gibson D.G., Young L., Chuang R.-Y., Venter J.C., Hutchison C.A., Smith H.O. Enzymatic assembly of DNA molecules up to several hundred kilobases. Nat. Methods. 2009;6:343–345. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Goranson J., Erbe J.L. In: E. coli plasmid vectors: methods and applications. Casali N., Preston A., editors. Humana Press; Totowa, NJ: 2003. Restriction analysis of recombinant plasmids; pp. 171–185. [Google Scholar]
  23. Goutam R.S., Kumar V., Lee U., Kim J. Cdx1 and Gsc distinctly regulate the transcription of BMP4 target gene ventx3. 2 by directly binding to the proximal promoter region in Xenopus gastrulae. Mol. Cells. 2024;47 doi: 10.1016/j.mocell.2024.100058. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Green M.R., Sambrook J. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; Cold Spring Harbor, NY: 2012. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. [Google Scholar]
  25. Green M.R., Sambrook J. Cloning and transformation with plasmid vectors. Cold Spring Harbor Protoc. 2021;2021:db–top101170. doi: 10.1101/pdb.top101170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Han M.H., Yang H.W., Yoon J., Villafani Y., Song J.Y., Pan C.H., Park K., Cho Y., Song J.J., Kim S.J., et al. Color-tuning mechanism of the lit form of orange carotenoid protein. Mol. Cells. 2023;46:513–525. doi: 10.14348/molcells.2023.2186. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Harbers M. The current status of cDNA cloning. Genom. 2008;91:232–242. doi: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2007.11.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Hartley J.L., Temple G.F., Brasch M.A. DNA cloning using in vitro site-specific recombination. Genome Res. 2000;10:1788–1795. doi: 10.1101/gr.143000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Heo H., Kim H.J., Haam K., Sohn H.A., Shin Y.J., Go H., Jung H.J., Kim J.H., Lee S.I., Song K.S., et al. Epigenetic activation of tensin 4 promotes gastric cancer progression. Mol. Cells. 2023;46:298–308. doi: 10.14348/molcells.2023.2148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Hsu S.-Y., Smanski M.J. In: Synthetic metabolic pathways: methods and protocols. Jensen M.K., Keasling J.D., editors. Humana Press; New York, NY: 2018. Designing and implementing algorithmic DNA assembly pipelines for multi-gene systems; pp. 131–147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Imdad S., Kim J.H., So B., Jang J., Park J., Lim W., Lee Y.K., Shin W.S., Hillyer T., Kang C. Effect of aerobic exercise and particulate matter exposure duration on the diversity of gut microbiota. Anim. Cells. Syst. 2024;28:137–151. doi: 10.1080/19768354.2024.2338855. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Jacobus A.P., Gross J. Optimal cloning of PCR fragments by homologous recombination in Escherichia coli. PLoS One. 2015;10 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0119221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Jeong D., Lee Y., Lee S.W., Ham S., Lee M., Choi N.Y., Wu G., Scholer H.R., Ko K. Homogeneity of XEN cells is critical for generation of chemically induced pluripotent stem cells. Mol. Cells. 2023;46:209–218. doi: 10.14348/molcells.2023.2127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Johnston C., Martin B., Fichant G., Polard P., Claverys J.-P. Bacterial transformation: distribution, shared mechanisms and divergent control. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2014;12:181–196. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro3199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Kim H., Kim J., Kim M., Park J.T., Sohn K.H. Comparative analysis on natural variants of fire blight resistance protein FB_MR5 indicates distinct effector recognition mechanisms. Mol. Cells. 2024;47 doi: 10.1016/j.mocell.2024.100094. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Kim H.E., Kwon T., Sim H.J., Park T.J. TRAP1 functions in the morphogenesis of the embryonic kidney. Anim. Cells. Syst. 2025;29:9–18. doi: 10.1080/19768354.2025.2477789. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Kim J., Kaleku J., Kim H., Kang M., Kang H.J., Woo J., Jin H., Jung S., Segonzac C., Park E., et al. An RXLR effector disrupts vesicle trafficking at ER-Golgi interface for Phytophthora capsica pathogenicity. Mol. Cells. 2024;47 doi: 10.1016/j.mocell.2024.100158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Kim M.K., Han S.H., Park T.G., Song S.H., Lee J.Y., Lee Y.S., Yoo S.Y., Chi X.Z., Kim E.G., Jang J.W., et al. The TGFβ→ TAK1→ LATS→ YAP1 pathway regulates the spatiotemporal dynamics of YAP1. Mol. Cells. 2023;46:592–610. doi: 10.14348/molcells.2023.0088. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Kirchmaier S., Lust K., Wittbrodt J. Golden GATEway cloning – a combinatorial approach to generate fusion and recombination constructs. PLoS One. 2013;8 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0076117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Kotnik T., Frey W., Sack M., Meglič S.H., Peterka M., Miklavčič D. Electroporation-based applications in biotechnology. Trends Biotechnol. 2015;33:480–488. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2015.06.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Lee J., Shin M.K., Ryu D.K., Kim S., Ryu W.S. In: In vitro mutagenesis protocols. Braman J., editor. Humana Press; Totowa, NJ: 2010. Insertion and deletion mutagenesis by overlap extension PCR; pp. 137–146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Lee J.Y., Lee S.M., Lee W.K., Park J.Y., Kim D.S. NAA10 hypomethylation is associated with particulate matter exposure and worse prognosis for patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Anim. Cells. Syst. 2023;27:72–82. doi: 10.1080/19768354.2023.2189934. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Lee N.Y., Kyun M.L., Yu J.E., Kim S.O., Lim K.H., Lee K.H. Transport of Golgi-localized β-catenin p-S47 by KIF11 or KIFC3 induces primary ciliogenesis. Mol. Cells. 2024;47 doi: 10.1016/j.mocell.2024.100142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Li L., Jiang W., Lu Y. In: Synthetic metabolic pathways: methods and protocols. Jensen M.K., Keasling J.D., editors. Humana Press; New York, NY: 2018. A modified Gibson assembly method for cloning large DNA fragments with high GC contents; pp. 203–209. [Google Scholar]
  45. Lodge J., Lund P., Minchin S. Taylor & Francis; New York, NY: 2007. Gene cloning: principles and applications. [Google Scholar]
  46. Luo Y., Qiu Y., Na R., Meerja F., shi Lu Q., Yang C., Tian L. A Golden Gate and Gateway double-compatible vector system for high throughput functional analysis of genes. Plant Sci. 2018;271:117–126. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2018.03.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Magnani E., Bartling L., Hake S. From Gateway to MultiSite Gateway in one recombination event. BMC Mol. Biol. 2006;7:46. doi: 10.1186/1471-2199-7-46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Maheshwari N., Kumar P., Sivaram A., Patil N. In: A complete guide to gene cloning: from basic to advanced. Patil N., Sivaram A., editors. Springer; Cham, Switzerland: 2022. Overview of gene cloning strategies; pp. 69–78. [Google Scholar]
  49. Menzella H.G. Comparison of two codon optimization strategies to enhance recombinant protein production in Escherichia coli. Microb. Cell. Fact. 2011;10:1–8. doi: 10.1186/1475-2859-10-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Nam K.K., Lee S., Zhou G., Cao X., Wang C., Clark T., Chen J., Rowley J.D., Wang S.M. Oligo (dT) primer generates a high frequency of truncated cDNAs through internal poly (A) priming during reverse transcription. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2002;99:6152–6156. doi: 10.1073/pnas.092140899. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Nguyen M.Q., Kim D.H., Shim H.J., Ta H.K.K., Vu T.L., Nguyen T.K.O., Lim J.C., Choe H. Novel anti-mesothelin nanobodies and recombinant immunotoxins with Pseudomonas exotoxin catalytic domain for cancer therapeutics. Mol. Cells. 2023;46:764–777. doi: 10.14348/molcells.2023.0155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Patil R., Sivaram A., Patil N. In: A complete guide to gene cloning: from basic to advanced. Patil N., Sivaram A., editors. Springer; Cham, Switzerland: 2022. Gene isolation methods: beginner’s guide; pp. 43–55. [Google Scholar]
  53. Pelley J.W. Elsevier; Philadelphia, PA: 2011. Elsevier's integrated review biochemistry. [Google Scholar]
  54. Pingoud A., Fuxreiter M., Pingoud V., Wende W. Type II restriction endonucleases: structure and mechanism. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2005;62:685–707. doi: 10.1007/s00018-004-4513-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Preston A. In: E. coli plasmid vectors: methods and applications. Casali N., Preston A., editors. Humana Press; Totowa, NJ: 2003. Choosing a cloning vector; pp. 19–26. [Google Scholar]
  56. Reece-Hoyes J.S., Walhout A.J. Gateway recombinational cloning. Cold Spring Harbor Protoc. 2018;2018:db–top094912. doi: 10.1101/pdb.top094912. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Robinson D., Walsh P.R., Bonventre J.A. In: Molecular biology problem solver: a laboratory guide. Gerstein A.S., editor. John Wiley & Sons; Hoboken, NJ: 2004. Restriction endonucleases; pp. 225–266. [Google Scholar]
  58. Sasaki Y., Sone T., Yoshida S., Yahata K., Hotta J., Chesnut J.D., Honda T., Imamoto F. Evidence for high specificity and efficiency of multiple recombination signals in mixed DNA cloning by the Multisite Gateway system. J. Biotechnol. 2004;107:233–243. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2003.10.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Sharma L., Mishra A.K., Mehraj V., Duraisamy G.S. Advances and applications of molecular cloning in clinical microbiology. Biotechnol. Genet. Eng. Rev. 2014;30:65–78. doi: 10.1080/02648725.2014.921501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Shi K., Bohl T.E., Park J., Zasada A., Malik S., Banerjee S., Tran V., Li N., Yin Z., Kurniawan F. T4 DNA ligase structure reveals a prototypical ATP-dependent ligase with a unique mode of sliding clamp interaction. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46:10474–10488. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky776. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Shuman S. DNA ligases: progress and prospects. J. Biol. Chem. 2009;284:17365–17369. doi: 10.1074/jbc.R900017200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Singh P.K., Singh P., Singh R.P., Singh R.L. In: Advances in animal genomics. Mondal S., Singh R.L., editors. Academic Press; London, UK: 2021. From gene to genomics: tools for improvement of animals; pp. 13–32. [Google Scholar]
  63. Um H., Jeong H., Lee B., Kim Y., Lee J., Roh J.S., Lee S.G., Park H.R., Robinson W.H., Sohn D.H. FAT10 induces cancer cell migration by stabilizing phosphorylated ABI3/NESH. Anim. Cells. Syst. 2023;27:53–60. doi: 10.1080/19768354.2023.2186486. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Walhout A.J., Temple G.F., Brasch M.A., Hartley J.L., Lorson M.A., van den Heuvel S., Vidal M. GATEWAY recombinational cloning: Application to the cloning of large numbers of open reading frames or ORFeomes. Methods Enzymol. 2000;328:575–592. doi: 10.1016/s0076-6879(00)28419-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Wang J.-W., Wang A., Li K., Wang B., Jin S., Reiser M., Lockey R.F. CRISPR/Cas9 nuclease cleavage combined with Gibson assembly for seamless cloning. BioTechniques. 2015;58:161–170. doi: 10.2144/000114261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Warren D.J. Preparation of highly efficient electrocompetent Escherichia coli using glycerol/mannitol density step centrifugation. Anal. Biochem. 2011;413:206–207. doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2011.02.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Weber E., Engler C., Gruetzner R., Werner S., Marillonnet S. A modular cloning system for standardized assembly of multigene constructs. PLoS One. 2011;6 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016765. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Wilkinson A., Smith A., Bullard D., Lavesa-Curto M., Sayer H., Bonner A., Hemmings A., Bowater R. Analysis of ligation and DNA binding by Escherichia coli DNA ligase (LigA) Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2005;1749:113–122. doi: 10.1016/j.bbapap.2005.03.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Wong D.W. Springer; Albany, CA: 2006. The ABCs of gene cloning. [Google Scholar]
  70. Yao S., Hart D.J., An Y. Recent advances in universal TA cloning methods for use in function studies. Protein Eng. 2016;29:551–556. doi: 10.1093/protein/gzw047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Zawaira A., Pooran A., Barichievy S., Chopera D. A discussion of molecular biology methods for protein engineering. Mol. Biotech. 2012;51:57–102. doi: 10.1007/s12033-011-9448-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Zhang K., Yin X., Shi K., Zhang S., Wang J., Zhao S., Deng H., Zhang C., Wu Z., Li Y., et al. A high-efficiency method for site-directed mutagenesis of large plasmids based on large DNA fragment amplification and recombinational ligation. Sci. Rep. 2021;11 doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-89884-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Zhou M.-Y., Gomez-Sanchez C.E. Universal TA cloning. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2000;2:1–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Molecules and Cells are provided here courtesy of Korean Society for Molecular and Cellular Biology

RESOURCES