Table 2.
Nanomaterials based thin film nanocomposite membranes performances.
| Polymer | Inorganic filler | NP conc. (g) | Water flux (LMH) | Main finding | Ref |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PES | TiO2 | 5.00 | 34.30 | Internal concentration remains a challenge in FO process | 28 |
| PSf | ZIF-8 | 0.2 | 1.39 |
NPs became larger after PSS coating ZIF-8 particles lost their stability due to degradation and agglomeration in water during PSS coating |
29 |
| PSf | CNT | 0.01 | 37.00 |
Increasing NP concentration affects the interfacial polymerization process and change the selectivity of the membranes Full-scale application is limited by high fabrication costs and environmental concerns |
24,30,31 |
| PSf | SiO2 | 0.05 | 22.50 | A critical need for optimizing the silica nanoparticle loading was required, overloading of silica was not advantageous for FO performance and even has the negative impact on the membrane properties | 30,32 |
| PES | MAX phase | 0.025 | 7.57 | No significant change observed in the porosity of membrane when varying the MAX content. While a dramatic change was witnessed in the pore size when increasing the MAX phase content from 0.025 to 0.075 wt% | 26 |
| CA | MXene | 4.00 | 125.10 |
The development of more facile and efficient techniques for the large-scale production of MXene-membranes are required Tuning the membrane characteristics, and applications in real conditions are the major challenges |
27 |