Skip to main content
Wiley Open Access Collection logoLink to Wiley Open Access Collection
. 2025 Jun 17;64(31):e202503940. doi: 10.1002/anie.202503940

Is Phenylnitrene a Missing Link in the Formation of Polycyclic Aromatic Nitrogen Heterocycles?

Rahel Arns 1, Rory McClish 2,3, Patrick Hemberger 4, Andras Bodi 4, Jordy Bouwman 2,3,5,, Tina Kasper 1, Domenik Schleier 6,
PMCID: PMC12304799  PMID: 40326970

Abstract

The incorporation of heteroatoms into the framework of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), in particular of nitrogen to yield polycyclic aromatic nitrogen heterocycles (PANHs), has been proposed for both astronomical and combustion environments, but no suitable precursors and pathways have been found. Analogous pathways to PAH formation are kinetically or energetically inhibited in the presence of a nitrogen heteroatom. We report on the reaction of phenylnitrene (3PhN, c‐C6H5N) with resonance‐stabilized propargyl radicals (C3H3) and find that the association reaction bifurcates depending on the orientation of the attacking propargyl radical and yields multiple isomeric products. Among them, we identify the condensed‐ring quinoline and conclude that nitrenes are viable candidates to drive the formation of PANHs.

Keywords: Astrochemistry, Nitrenes, Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, Radical chemistry, Reaction dynamics


A new formation pathway for polycyclic aromatic nitrogen heterocycles (PANHs) has been found. The reaction of phenylnitrene and the propargyl radical leads to quinoline, proving that nitrenes are suitable precursors for nitrogen incorporation mechanisms. We use double imaging photoelectron photoion coincidence (PEPICO) spectroscopy to identify the products and quantum chemistry to explore the mechanism in detail.

graphic file with name ANIE-64-e202503940-g007.jpg


Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) are ubiquitous in both terrestrial[ 1 ] and extraterrestrial environments.[ 2 , 3 , 4 ] Their formation mechanisms have been a research focus for decades in both astrochemistry and combustion to explain their abundance and to reduce their anthropogenic emissions.[ 5 , 6 ] Multiple mechanisms were discovered that yield small PAHs[ 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 ] and explain their propensity to grow into larger aromatic structures, which is enabled and driven by resonance‐stabilized radicals (RSR).[ 11 ] These mechanisms are active in similar conditions, such as at high temperatures (>1000 K) and in fuel‐rich environments, which facilitates the incomplete oxidation of the starting materials. Consequently, extraterrestrial PAHs are believed to originate in the outflow of carbon‐rich stars under similar high‐temperature conditions.[ 12 , 13 ] However, astronomers found that heteroatoms, in particular nitrogen, may be locked up in aromatic molecules, which could play a vital role in the chemistry of space.[ 14 , 15 , 16 ] Yet, the mechanism and conditions by which polycyclic aromatic nitrogen heterocycles (PANHs) may be produced are not known. This is further exacerbated by a lack of PANH detection in some nitrogen–rich model environments, such as ammonia/hydrocarbon flames,[ 17 , 18 , 19 ] which questions if PANHs can be formed under the same conditions as PAHs. On the one hand, low‐temperature (<20 K) formation routes based on ionic nitrogen species[ 16 , 20 ] and neutral nitrogen‐bearing hydrocarbon radicals[ 21 , 22 , 23 ] have been suggested as an alternative source for PANHs. However, there is hardly any evidence that the proposed radicals are abundant in (extra)terrestrial environments. On the other hand, phenylnitrene (3PhN, 1, Scheme 1), the smallest aromatic nitrene (R–N:), was identified in pyrrole and pyridine flames,[ 24 , 25 , 26 ] as well as in processed benzene‐doped N2 ices,[ 27 ] corresponding to two model environments for circumstellar and interstellar conditions. Moreover, nitrenes have become useful tools in organic chemistry to form new C─N bonds,[ 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 ] and their reactions with RSR may be plausible sources for PANHs under high‐ and low‐temperature conditions. One key reactant for PAH formation in combustion[ 33 ] and astrochemistry,[ 34 ] is the resonance‐stabilized propargyl radical (C3H3, 2, Scheme 1), whose presence has been established in various objects.[ 35 , 36 ]

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1

Chemical structure of triplet phenylnitrene (3PhN, 1) and the resonance structures of propargyl (C3H3, 2).

The lack of knowledge on bimolecular nitrene chemistry combined with their unique properties and potential to form PANHs motivated us to investigate the reaction of triplet phenylnitrene with the propargyl radical in a pyrolysis microreactor, using double imaging photoelectron photoion coincidence (i2PEPICO) spectroscopy.

To provide an overview of the pyrolysis products and side products formed when pyrolyzing the isolated nitrene and propargyl precursors, Figure 1 displays mass spectra recorded at a photon energy of 9.00 eV. In the upper trace, the pyrolysis of phenyl azide is shown, which has been the subject of a dedicated investigation using the same instrument.[ 37 ] The complete conversion of the precursor is achieved at ≈520 °C, and besides 3PhN observed at m/z 91, signals arise at m/z 93, as well as 143, 154, 167–169, and 182. The first is identified as aniline,[ 37 ] and the last corresponds to azobenzene, the dimer of 3PhN.[ 38 ] The masses between the two arise primarily from the pyrolysis of azobenzene and have been identified in a previous study.[ 39 ] A detailed assignment of products is provided in Figure S1. In the middle trace, propargyl iodide was pyrolyzed, resulting in signals at m/z 39, 78, 116, and 204, corresponding to the propargyl radical (Figure S2), C6H6 isomers,[ 34 ] indene, and iodobenzene (Figure S3), respectively. These observations are in line with previous investigations of the propargyl self‐reaction under similar conditions.[ 34 , 40 ] In the co‐flow experiments displayed in the bottom trace of Figure 1, the mass spectrum is almost identical to the sum of the individual precursor spectra. However, a small peak at m/z 129 emerges (highlighted in the red trace), which becomes more prominent at higher temperatures, best seen in the top trace of Figure S5.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Pyrolysis mass spectra of phenyl azide (PhN3, top), propargyl iodide (C3H3I, middle), and a co‐flow of both (bottom) recorded at a photon energy of 9.00 eV. The newly formed m/z 129 peak in the bottom trace is highlighted in red (× 10) for better visibility.

To suppress the isomerization of PhN to cyanocyclopentadiene (Cp–CN),[ 37 ] we chose as gentle pyrolysis conditions as possible to still observe bimolecular chemistry involving our species of interest. A detailed description of our approach is given in Chapter S5. In summary, phenyl azide decomposes already at 450 °C, while propargyl iodide decomposition sets in at 520 °C. As such, 520 °C was determined to be the lowest possible temperature to observe bimolecular chemistry. Fortunately, the closed‐shell nature of aniline and Cp–CN makes their association reactions with propargyl radicals unlikely. To verify this hypothesis, we calculated the initial association reaction steps between aniline as well as the three Cp–CN isomers and propargyl (Figures S8–S10). For aniline, we find barriers between +49 and +78 kJ mol−1 for propargyl attaching to the phenyl ring, and a barrier of +188 kJ mol−1 for the reaction with the amino group (Figures S11 and S12). It must also be noted that the formed intermediates are either highly endothermic (+143 kJ mol−1) or approximately isoenergetic to the isolated reactants. For Cp–CN, all isomers exhibit energy barriers between +64 and +95 kJ mol−1 and the subsequently formed intermediates are endothermic, underlining their low reactivity toward propargyl.

Next, we determined the isomeric composition of m/z 129 by recording a mass‐selected threshold photoelectron spectrum (ms‐TPES), displayed in the top trace of Figure 2. The spectrum shows a slow rise starting at around 8.2 eV with superimposed features and reaches its maximum at 8.62 eV. At higher photon energies, the signal remains at a high level without a clear vibronic structure and declines only slightly. The structure of the spectrum suggests that multiple isomeric species with adiabatic ionization energies (IE ad ) between 8.1 and 8.7 eV are present.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

ms‐TPES of mass channel 129 in the co‐flow experiment at 520 °C (top). Only thermalized ions were selected to construct the ms‐TPES. Individual simulations of potential isomeric product species (bottom). Calculated IE ad at the CBS‐QB3 level (Table 1) were shifted within the error limit to reproduce the experiment best.

To estimate which molecules contribute to the spectrum, we calculated the IE ad of 18 different C9H7N isomers listed in Table S1.[ 41 ] Of those, nine can be excluded due to their IE ad exceeding 8.90 eV. These also have the highest formation energy and can only form through major rearrangements that include multiple C–C bond scissions. Further, two isomers have calculated IE ad below 8.1 eV and can be ruled out based on the absent m/z 129 peak at this energy. The remaining seven with an IE ad in the investigated region are listed in Table 1. Based on Franck–Condon (FC) simulations displayed in Figure S13, the broad featureless rise can be best attributed to the substituted benzene product P4 Z, while the vibronic features on top could originate from either of the condensed ring products P1, P2, P3 and P5. For P6, the FC‐simulation predicts an intense peak near the origin transition at 8.11 eV. Yet, the ms‐TPE signal remains low and only starts to rise slowly above 8.2 eV, indicating negligible production. We can describe the spectrum reasonably well using a mixture of the remaining isomers P1, P2, P3, P4 E, P4 Z, and P5 illustrated in Figure S14. Even though the simulation agrees qualitatively, some discrepancies can be observed at 8.55 eV and above 8.65 eV. The agreement between FC simulations and experiments commonly deteriorates at higher energies, which is either caused by increasing anharmonicities due to an insufficient description of the cationic potential wells at large vibronic quantum numbers or due to the presence of electronically excited cation states. We also tried to limit the amount of contributors by omitting P3, P4 E, P4 Z, and P5, as depicted in Figure S15. Although P1 and P2 describe most spectral features, they do not explain the rise between 8.2 and 8.5 eV, which requires P4 Z, especially since only thermalized ions were selected, effectively eliminating potential hot‐band contributions.[ 43 ] To further prove quinoline (P1) formation, Figure S16 compares the experimental spectrum to the previously recorded ms‐TPES of quinoline,[ 42 ] and its FC‐simulation used in Figure 2. Although our experiment exhibits a slightly broader origin band and its maximum is shifted by ≈10 meV to lower energies, the vibronic feature at 8.79 eV further corroborates the assignment. The presence of three isomers P3, P4 E, and P5 is questionable based on the ms‐TPES and the FC‐simulations alone. P3 is only indicated through a small peak at 8.48 eV, while the remaining vibrational features may be convoluted with the resonances of P1 and P2. Similarly, P4 E and P5 cannot be unambiguously identified even though their inclusion in the simulation improves the agreement with the experiment slightly. As such, neither reference spectra nor FC‐simulations allow for a clear identification or exclusion of these isomers based on the experimental data.

Table 1.

Potential reactions products of the 3PhN + propargyl reaction with IE ad between 8.1 and 8.9 eV. Calculated IE ad are based on CBS‐QB3 calculations.

Molecule Label IE ad, calc /eV IE ad, exp /eV
graphic file with name ANIE-64-e202503940-g002.jpg P1 8.68 8.61[ 42 ]
graphic file with name ANIE-64-e202503940-g004.jpg P2 8.57
graphic file with name ANIE-64-e202503940-g005.jpg P3 8.48
graphic file with name ANIE-64-e202503940-g010.jpg P4 E 8.19
graphic file with name ANIE-64-e202503940-g011.jpg P4 Z 8.14
graphic file with name ANIE-64-e202503940-g012.jpg P5 8.65
graphic file with name ANIE-64-e202503940-g008.jpg P6 8.11

Spectral assignment goes hand in hand with understanding of the underlying chemistry, which is why we explored the potential energy surface (PES) of the main reaction. A summary of the lowest‐energy pathways is shown in Figure 3 and a detailed description of each route is given in Chapter S8. The propargyl radical is resonantly stabilized and exhibits spin density on both terminal carbon atoms. This enables its attack on phenylnitrene with either its CH or CH2 site.[ 44 , 45 ] In both cases, the association reaction between the two reactants is barrierless. Thus, depending on the impact parameter for the two entrance channels, the CH and CH2 reaction channels may yield two sets of final products, which do not compete with each other. We will start our PES exploration with the CH reaction and explore the CH2 reaction afterwards.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Overview of the product formation pathways in the phenylnitrene and propargyl association reaction at the CBS‐QB3 level. Only the highest‐energy, rate‐determining transition state is given for each pathway. Color coding of the products is according to Figure 2. Propargyl can attack phenylnitrene with the CH–site (left) or with its CH2–site (right). The E–configuration for I1 is omitted for simplicity. A detailed description of the reaction pathways can be found in the Supporting Information.

The lowest energy pathway (Figure S18) leads over a submerged transition state at −219 kJ mol−1, resulting in a barrier of +72 kJ mol−1 with respect to I1 and forms a five‐membered ring containing a terminal methylene (CH2) group. The mechanism branches into two pathways after ring closure (I2, Figure S19), one to P1 and one to P2. The barriers for P1 formation are lower, and the CH2–group can insert into the five‐membered ring by a mechanism akin to fulvene–benzene isomerization.[ 33 ] Yet, the barrier for hydrogen atom elimination from I2 to P2 is only 25 kJ mol−1 higher, so that the two channels are expected to compete according to the number of states of their rate‐determining transition states. Based on the ms‐TPES, rates for P1 and P2 are competitive, and both are formed through these pathways. Three more pathways with significantly higher rate‐limiting transition states leading to P1 (Figures S20–S22) are not expected to be able to compete statistically. Similarly, the channels to the ring‐open products P4 E, P4 Z, and P7 (Figure S23) exhibit barriers that are too high to be competitive with P1/P2 formation. The same is true for the imine product P3 (Figure S24). Hence, the CH reaction explains the appearance of the condensed products P1 and P2, but P3, P4 E, P4 Z, and P5 are unlikely to be formed.

In contrast to the CH reaction, the CH2 reaction will not form a five‐membered ring, as the required cyclization is associated with significantly higher‐energy transition states between −21 kJ mol−1 and +56 kJ mol−1 (Figures S25 and S26). These correspond to intramolecular hydrogen shifts to saturate the terminal CH and enable condensed ring formation. Consequently, we do not expect P1 and P2 production in the same way as for the CH2 reaction. On the contrary, the energetically most favorable pathways are to the ring‐open products P4 E and P4 Z, exhibiting transition states at −80 and −83 kJ mol−1 (Figure S27 and S28). These final products are expected to dominate, although cyclization and condensed ring formation may still be possible, bypassing the five‐membered ring intermediate over a −59 kJ mol−1 rate‐determining transition state to yield P1 as a minor product of the CH2 reaction (Figure S29).

The PES exploration highlights that the orientation of the propargyl radical as it attacks phenylnitrene is crucial for determining the outcome of the reaction. The CH reaction leads to the formation of P1 and P2, while the ring‐open species P4 Z and P4 E are formed through the CH2 reaction. We could not find competitive routes to P3 (Figure S24) and P5 computationally. The relatively large reorganization required for both and the high energy of P5 (−130 kJ mol−1) mean that they are unlikely to be formed as a result of the reaction between PhN and propargyl. However, we cannot exclude their presence in the experiment as a result of secondary processes, which are not covered by our PES and do not affect P1 formation. A detailed discussion on the presence of P3 and P5 is given in Section S8.1.3.

The proof for the possibility of nitrogen heteroatom incorporation in the PAH growth mechanism under high temperature conditions has long been missing in astro‐ and combustion chemistry. Although the pyridyl radical has been suggested to be important in such environments,[ 21 , 22 ] it has not been detected there so far. Nitrenes can fill this gap, and their detection in flames and processed ices corroborates their importance under such conditions.[ 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 ] Nitrenes are generally more stable than their carbene analogues and nitrogen‐containing carbenes isomerize easily to the respective nitrenes.[ 46 ] The presence of carbenes has been established multiple times in astrochemistry and hints for phenylcarbene have been found in toluene flames,[ 47 ] making the presence of nitrenes, such as 3PhN, plausible. The barrierless reaction between 3PhN and propargyl, followed by submerged transition states and hydrogen atom elimination to stabilize the final products, also makes it a possible source of PANHs in the interstellar medium (ISM). So far, only HACA or HAVA mechanisms are known to lead to PANHs, such as quinoline.[ 21 , 22 ] However, their precondition for molecular growth is that the nitrogen atom must be already incorporated in the aromatic framework. Our nitrene mechanism accounts for precisely this step, the incorporation of the nitrogen atom into the aromatic framework. Since the detection of PANHs in the ISM is hampered by their weak rotational transitions[ 48 , 49 ] we suggest searching for PANH precursors instead. In fact, a similar strategy is currently being followed to infer the presence of larger PAHs through their nitrile derivatives.[ 50 ] However, before such efforts can succeed, fundamental data, such as gas phase rotational spectra, need to be obtained for nitrenes to guide future observations.

In summary, we have investigated the role nitrenes play in PANH formation. For this, we generated triplet phenylnitrene and propargyl radicals in a pyrolysis microreactor and identified a product peak at m/z 129, aligning with the formation of C9H7N species. To determine the isomeric composition, we recorded the ms‐TPES, which revealed a complex mixture of several isomeric products containing monocyclic and bicyclic aromatic species. Investigation of the PES shows that, depending on the orientation of the propargyl radical, different products are expected in its reaction with phenylnitrene. Barrierless cyclization is the lowest energy pathway for the reaction of the CH‐terminal propargyl radical, whereas in the CH2‐reaction, linear side‐chains are energetically favorable. As such, nitrenes can explain the occurrence of PANHs in high‐temperature environments akin to the formation of their carbonaceous congeners. PAHs and PANHs can thus have similar origins, and both should be considered in PAH models. Lastly, we believe that 3PhN is a promising target for astronomical observations as well as an important intermediate in nitrogen‐rich flames.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Supporting information

Supporting Information

Acknowledgements

The measurements were performed at the Swiss Light Source, located at Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland. This work was supported in part by NASA's Solar System Exploration Research Virtual Institute (SSERVI): Institute for Modeling Plasma, Atmosphere, and Cosmic Dust (IMPACT). This material is based on work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. 2308045. D.S. acknowledges support by the PRIME programme of the German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD) with funds from the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF). D.S. and T.K. acknowledge a grant for computing time at the Paderborn Center for Parallel Computing PC2 under the project PEPICON. T.K. gratefully acknowledges funding from DFG under project number KA 3871/3‐2 and 270672969.

Open access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.

Dedicated to Prof. Dr. Harold Linnartz. Mentor, friend, and inspiration transcending realms

Arns R., McClish R., Hemberger P., Bodi A., Bouwman J., Kasper T., Schleier D., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2025, 64, e202503940. 10.1002/anie.202503940

Contributor Information

Prof. Dr. Jordy Bouwman, Email: jordy.bouwman@colorado.edu.

Dr. Domenik Schleier, Email: schleier@physik.tu-berlin.de.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available in the Supporting Information of this article.

References

  • 1. Ravindra K., Sokhi R., Van Grieken R., Atmos. Environ. 2008, 42, 2895–2921. [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Tielens A., Ann. Rev. Astr. Astrophys. 2008, 46, 289–337. [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Sabbah H., Quitté G., Demyk K., Joblin C., Nat. Sci. 2024, 4, e20240010. [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Chown R., Sidhu A., Peeters E., Tielens A. G. G. M., Cami J., Berné O., Habart E., Alarcón F., Canin A., Schroetter I., Trahin B., Van De Putte D., Abergel A., Bergin E. A., Bernard‐Salas J., Boersma C., Bron E., Cuadrado S., Dartois E., Dicken D., El‐Yajouri M., Fuente A., Goicoechea J. R., Gordon K. D., Issa L., Joblin C., Kannavou O., Khan B., Lacinbala O., Languignon D., et al., A & A 2024, 685, A75. [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Kaiser R. I., Hansen N., J. Phys. Chem. A 2021, 125, 3826–3840. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Kohse‐Höinghaus K., Chem. Rev. 2023, 123, 5139–5219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. McCabe M. N., Hemberger P., Reusch E., Bodi A., Bouwman J., J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2020, 11, 2859–2863. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Mebel A. M., Landera A., Kaiser R. I., J. Phys. Chem. A 2017, 121, 901–926. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Couch D. E., Zhang A. J., Taatjes C. A., Hansen N., Angew. Chem,. Int. Ed. 2021, 60, 27230–27235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Hirsch F., Reusch E., Constantinidis P., Fischer I., Bakels S., Rijs A. M., Hemberger P., J. Phys. Chem. A 2018, 122, 9563–9571. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Johansson K. O., Head‐Gordon M. P., Schrader P. E., Wilson K. R., Michelsen H. A., Science 2018, 361, 997–1000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Allamandola L. J., Tielens A. G. G. M., Barker J. R., Astrophys. J. 1985, 290, L25–L28. [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Cherchneff I., Barker J. R., Astrophys. J. 1992, 394, 703. [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Hudgins D. M., Bauschlicher Jr C. W., Allamandola L., Astrophys. J. 2005, 632, 316. [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Ricca A., Boersma C., Peeters E., Astrophys. J. 2021, 923, 202. [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Rap D. B., Schrauwen J. G. M., Marimuthu A. N., Redlich B., Brünken S., Nat. Astron. 2022, 6, 1059–1067. [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Li Y., Zhang Y., Zhan R., Huang Z., Lin H., Energy 2020, 213, 118868. [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Ren F., Cheng X., Gao Z., Huang Z., Zhu L., Combust. Flame 2022, 241, 111958. [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Steinmetz S., Ahmed H., Boyette W., Dunn M., Roberts W., Masri A., Fuel 2022, 307, 121914. [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Rap D. B., Schrauwen J. G. M., Redlich B., Brünken S., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2024, 146, 23022–23033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Parker D. S., Kaiser R. I., Kostko O., Troy T. P., Ahmed M., Mebel A. M., Tielens A. G., Astrophys. J. 2015, 803, 53. [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Zhao L., Lu W., Ahmed M., Zagidullin M. V., Azyazov V. N., Morozov A. N., Mebel A. M., Kaiser R. I., Science Adv. 2021, 7, eabf0360. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Yang Z., He C., Goettl S. J., Mebel A. M., Velloso P. F. G., Alves M. O., Galvão B. R. L., Loison J.‐C., Hickson K. M., Dobrijevic M., Li X., Kaiser R. I., Nat. Astron. 2024, 8, 856–864. [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Tian Z., Li Y., Zhang T., Zhu A., Cui Z., Qi F., Combust. Flame 2007, 151, 347–365. [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Tian Z.‐y., Yuan T., Wang J., Li Y.‐y., Zhang T.‐c., Zhu A.‐g., Qi F., Chin. J. Chem. Phys. 2007, 20, 425–430. [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Tian Z., Li Y., Zhang T., Zhu A., Qi F., J. Phys. Chem. A 2008, 112, 13549–13555. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Lin S.‐Y., Chou S.‐L., Huang W.‐J., Huang T.‐P., Tseng C.‐M., Wu Y.‐J., ACS Earth Space Chem. 2023, 7, 1416–1422. [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Grünwald A., Goswami B., Breitwieser K., Morgenstern B., Gimferrer M., Heinemann F. W., Momper D. M., Kay C. W. M., Munz D., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2022, 144, 8897–8901. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Dequina H. J., Jones C. L., Schomaker J. M., Chem 2023, 9, 1658–1701. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Mitchell J. K., Hussain W. A., Bansode A. H., O'Connor R. M., Parasram M., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2024, 146, 9499–9505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Song L., Tian X., Farshadfar K., Shiri F., Rominger F., Ariafard A., Hashmi A. S. K., Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 831. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Holland J. P., Gut M., Klingler S., Fay R., Guillou A., Chem. Eur. J. 2020, 26, 33–48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Miller J. A., Klippenstein S. J., J. Phys. Chem. A 2003, 107, 7783–7799. [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Hrodmarsson H. R., Garcia G. A., Bourehil L., Nahon L., Gans B., Boyé‐Péronne S., Guillemin J.‐C., Loison J.‐C., Commun. Chem. 2024, 7, 156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Agúndez M., Marcelino N., Cabezas C., Fuentetaja R., Tercero B., de Vicente P., Cernicharo J., A & A 2022, 657, A96. [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Nixon C. A., ACS Earth Space Chem. 2024, 8, 406–456. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Mendez‐Vega E., Sander W., Hemberger P., J. Phys. Chem. A 2020, 124, 3836–3843. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Wentrup C., Chem. Rev. 2017, 117, 4562–4623. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Constantinidis P., Schmitt H.‐C., Fischer I., Yan B., Rijs A., Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2015, 17, 29064–29071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Constantinidis P., Hirsch F., Fischer I., Dey A., Rijs A., J. Phys. Chem. A 2017, 121, 181–191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Bouwman J., Bodi A., Hemberger P., Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2018, 20, 29910–29917. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Bouwman J., Sztáray B., Oomens J., Hemberger P., Bodi A., J. Phys. Chem. A 2015, 119, 1127–1136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Hemberger P., Wu X., Pan Z., Bodi A., J. Phys. Chem. A 2022, 126, 2196–2210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Jochnowitz E. B., Zhang X., Nimlos M. R., Varner M. E., Stanton J. F., Ellison G. B., J. Phys. Chem. A 2005, 109, 3812–3821. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Changala P. B., Franke P. R., Stanton J. F., Ellison G. B., McCarthy M. C., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2024, 146, 1512–1521. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Kvaskoff D., Lüerssen H., Bednarek P., Wentrup C., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 15203–15214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Keksel E., Kluge S., Schleier D., Höner M., Karakaya Y., Bierkandt T., Köhler M., Kasper T., Combust. Flame 2025, 274, 113978. [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Barnum T. J., Siebert M. A., Lee K. L. K., Loomis R. A., Changala P. B., Charnley S. B., Sita M. L., Xue C., Remijan A. J., Burkhardt A. M., McGuire B. A., Cooke I. R., J. Phys. Chem. A 2022, 126, 2716–2728. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Charnley S. B., Kuan Y.‐J., Huang H.‐C., Botta O., Butner H. M., Cox N., Despois D., Ehrenfreund P., Kisiel Z., Lee Y.‐Y., Markwick A. J., Peeters Z., Rodgers S. D., Adv. Space Res. 2005, 36, 137–145. [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Wenzel G., Speak T. H., Changala P. B., Willis R. H. J., Burkhardt A. M., Zhang S., Bergin E. A., Byrne A. N., Charnley S. B., Fried Z. T. P., Gupta H., Herbst E., Holdren M. S., Lipnicky A., Loomis R. A., Shingledecker C. N., Xue C., Remijan A. J., Wendlandt A. E., McCarthy M. C., Cooke I. R., McGuire B. A., Nat. Astron. 2025, 9, 262–270. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supporting Information

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available in the Supporting Information of this article.


Articles from Angewandte Chemie (International Ed. in English) are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES