Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2025 Jul 29.
Published in final edited form as: J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2023 Feb 4;66(8):1817–1825. doi: 10.1007/s10840-023-01496-x

Table 4.

Effectiveness Outcome Events by Ablation Catheter (covariate-unadjusted data)

Mercy Mayo Clinic
ThermoCool STSF (n=35) ThermoCool ST (n=23) ThermoCool STSF (n=35) ThermoCool ST (n=84)
Effectiveness Outcome Events N (%) N (%) N (%) N (%)
Within 6 months post index ablation
Rehospitalization for VT 3 (8.6%) 2 (8.7%) 2 (5.7%) 5 (6.0%)
Rehospitalization for heart failure 2 (5.7%) 2 (8.7%) 2 (5.7%) 5 (6.0%)
Repeat ablation for VT 2 (5.7%) 0 (0.0%) 2 (5.7%) 4 (4.8%)
Number of effectiveness events 7 (20.0%) 4 (17.4%) 6 (17.1%) 14 (16.7%)
Number of patients who had effectiveness events 6 (17.1%) 4 (17.4%) 4 (11.4%) 8 (9.5%)
Within 1 year post index ablation
Rehospitalization for VT 3 (8.6%) 2 (8.7%) 5 (14.3%) 10 (11.9%)
Rehospitalization for heart failure 3 (8.6%) 3 (13.0%) 5 (14.3%) 8 (9.5%)
Repeat ablation for VT 2 (5.7%) 0 (0.0%) 4 (11.4%) 5 (6.0%)
Number of effectiveness events 8 (22.9%) 5 (21.7%) 14 (40.0%) 23 (27.4%)
Number of patients who had effectiveness events 7 (20.0%) 5 (21.7%) 8 (22.9%) 15 (17.9%)

Duplicate patients may be included due to multiple events in a patient.