Skip to main content
. 2025 Jul 16;16:1570593. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1570593

Table 1.

CRISPR-SeroSeq summary results of Salmonella-positive samples from GPLN (n = 568).

Serovara Frequencyb Present (%)c Alone (%)d Major (%)e Average relative frequency (%)f Monthsg Companiesh
Kentucky I 462 81.3 86 65 94 23 20
Cerro 43 7.6 30 57 65 10 5
Mbandaka 34 6 12 17 30 15 7
Typhimurium 25 4.4 32 41 62 14 11
Liverpool 21 3.7 29 53 58 11 6
Infantis 19 3.3 16 12 38 11 6
Alachua 17 3 47 11 61 6 2
Senftenberg II 12 2.1 8 18 36 8 6
Tennessee 9 1.6 11 25 36 5 5
Enteritidis 8 1.4 62 0 72 5 7
Uganda 8 1.4 12 57 49 5 1
Montevideo I 6 1.1 0 17 18 4 3
Montevideo II 6 1.1 0 0 4 3 4
Agona 5 0.9 40 0 45 3 3
Altona 5 0.9 20 25 39 5 2
Anatum 5 0.9 20 25 42 2 3
Untypeable 5 0.9 20 0 32 3 2
a

Only serovars present in five or more samples were included (n = 17), including five serovars of clinical importance (bolded), that are most often causing outbreaks (Center for Disease Control and Prevention BEAM Dashboard). The suffixes (-I, -II, -III) for some serovars refer to polyphyletic lineages.

b

Indicates the total number of samples each serovar was found in.

c

Indicates the total percentage of samples each serovar was found in.

d

Indicates how often a serovar was the single serovar in a sample.

e

Indicates the frequency in which the serovar was present at a higher relative frequency in a mixed population of multiple serovars.

f

This was calculated across all “present” samples.

g

Indicates how many months (n = 24) each serovar was identified in.

h

Indicates how many companies (n = 22) each serovar was identified from.