Table 5.
Comparisons between daily loneliness trajectory groups on binge eating and food addiction symptoms.
| Binge Eating | Food Addiction | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M | SE | Χ2 | M | SE | Χ2 | |
| Group 1- Early low loneliness, increasing | 2.36 | 0.33 |
1 vs. 2 = 0.80, p =.371 1 vs. 3 = 0.37, p =.541 1 vs. 4 = 0.18, p =.676 1 vs. 5 = 0.27, p =.607 1 vs. 6 = 0.12, p =.726 |
1.57 | 0.18 |
1 vs. 2 = 3.07, p =.080 1 vs. 3 = 0.03, p =.874 1 vs. 4 = 0.15, p =.703 1 vs. 5 = 1.73, p =.188 1 vs. 6 = 0.04, p =.851 |
| Group 2- Elevated early loneliness, decreasing then increasing | 2.72 | 0.31 |
2 vs. 3 = 0.35, p =.554 2 vs. 4 = 0.26, p =.608 2 vs. 5 = 2.61, p =.106 2 vs. 6 = 0.57, p =.449 |
1.93 | 0.21 |
2 vs. 3 = 2.17, p =.141 2 vs. 4 = 1.73, p =.188 2 vs. 5 = 7.91, p =.005 2 vs. 6 = 2.86, p =.091 |
| Group 3- Stable high loneliness | 2.50 | 0.23 |
3 vs. 4 = 0.02, p =.934 3 vs. 5 = 1.43, p =.232 3 vs. 6 = 0.001, p =.973 |
1.53 | 0.17 |
3 vs. 4 = 0.21, p =.644 3 vs. 5 = 1.54, p =.215 3 vs. 6 = 0.11, p =.740 |
| Group 4- Low early loneliness, increasing then decreasing | 2.53 | 0.24 |
4 vs. 5 = 1.79, p =.181 4 vs. 6 = 0.02, p =.888 |
1.65 | 0.21 |
4 vs. 5 = 2.50, p =.114 4 vs. 6 = 0.07, p =.793 |
| Group 5- Stable low loneliness | 2.19 | 0.13 | 5 vs. 6 = 2.88, p =.089 | 1.32 | 0.06 | 5 vs. 6 = 4.13,p =.042 |
| Group 6- Elevated early loneliness, decreasing | 2.49 | 0.21 | - | 1.61 | 0.15 | - |