Skip to main content
. 2025 Jul 29;15:27604. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-12277-z

Table 7.

Comparison of Technique 1 and Technique 2 for modulation scheme classification and parameter optimization.

Aspect Technique 1 Technique 2
Methodology Hierarchical classification with primary and parameter-specific classifiers Direct classification of full dataset without hierarchy
Primary classification accuracy 98.18% (decision tree) N/A
FSK, PSK M classification 99.81% (decision tree) N/A
CPM M classification 99.81% (ensemble subspace KNN) N/A
CPM L classification 99.84% (ensemble subspace KNN) N/A
CPM h classification 99.91% (ensemble subspace KNN) N/A
CPM mode classification 99.3% (narrow neural network) N/A
PSK/FSK mode classification 99.8% (decision tree) N/A
Overall mode classification accuracy 99.41% (narrow neural network and decision tree) 98.35% (bilayered neural network) for direct classification
Classifier types Decision tree, narrow neural network and ensemble subspace KNN Neural network
Approach Hierarchical classification by modulation type and parameters (M, h, L, mode) Single-step mode classification