Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2025 Jul 30.
Published in final edited form as: Perspect ASHA Spec Interest Groups. 2023 Jun 6;8(3):542–557. doi: 10.1044/2023_persp-22-00221

Table 1.

Factors explored in SRT.

Factor Impact on SRT Citation
Age Increased with age Byeon and Koh (2016); Humbert et al. (2018); Kendall and Leonard (2001); Kim et al. (2005); Leonard and McKenzie (2006); Mancopes et al. (2021); Nagaya et al. (1998); Robbins et al. (1992)
Increased with age (all participants were males) Logemann et al. (2000)
No significant difference between younger and older adults (all participants were females) Logemann et al. (2002)
No significant difference between younger and older adults Kang et al. (2010)
Sex Increased with males compared to females Humbert et al. (2018)
Increased with females compared to males when manometric catheter in situ, but no significant difference without catheter Robbins et al. (1992)
No significant difference between males and females Kim et al. (2005); Mancopes et al. (2021); Molfenter and Steele (2013); Nagy et al. (2013); Steele et al. (2019)
Viscosity Increased with mixed consistency compared to thin liquid Humbert et al. (2018)
Increased with semisolids compared to liquids Robbins et al. (1992)
Increased with thicker liquids Steele et al. (2019)
No significant difference between thin liquid and paste Kendall et al. (2001)
No significant difference between thin liquid and mildly thick liquid Oommen et al. (2011)
Volume Increased with larger volume Chi-Fishman and Sonies (2000)
Decreased with larger volume Kendall and Leonard (2001)
No significant effect of volume Kendall et al. (2000); Mancopes et al. (2021); Oommen et al. (2011); Power et al. (2007); Steele et al. (2019)
Cueing Decreased with verbal cues to swallow Daniels et al. (2007)
No significant difference between cued and noncued swallows Nagy et al. (2013)
Temperature Decreased with room temperature bolus compared to cold bolus Humbert et al. (2018)

Note. SRT = swallow reaction time.