Table 3.
Literature review of the surgical accuracy achieved in tumor surgery
| Authors | Year | Number of cases | Type of study | Site | Method | Accuracy/Deviation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K. C. Wong et al. [22] | 2015 | 1 | In vivo | Pelvic region | PSI | 1.3–4.0 mm |
| Matthew A. Siegel BS et al. [16] | 2020 | 22 | Ex vivo | Sacropelvic region | Freehand |
67.0%≤5 mm 25.8%≤2 mm |
| Navigation |
71.1%≤5 mm 32.5%≤2 mm |
|||||
| PSI |
85.6%≤5 mm 47.5%≤2 mm |
|||||
| Qing Zhang et al. [14] | 2020 | 10 | In vivo | Pelvic region | Navigation | 95%CI: [-3.95, -3.27] |
| 16 | In vivo | Long bones | Navigation | 95%CI: [-2.69, -2.34] | ||
| Daniel A Müller et al. [21] | 2020 | 11 | In vivo | Pelvic region, long bones and scapula | PSI | Range from 0.74 ± 0.96 mm to 3.60 ± 2.46 mm |
| Current Study | 2024 | 9 | In vivo | Sacral | PSI | 4.27° (IQR 4.15) 4.00 mm (IQR 2.90) |
PSI, patient-specific instrument