ABSTRACT
Aims
To investigate the effects of an 8‐week standardized computerized working memory training (WMT) program on cortical microstructure, morphometric similarity network (MSN) changes, and associated genetic factors in healthy adults.
Methods
A total of 76 participants were divided into WMT and control groups. Cortical morphological measurements, including cortical thickness (CT) and fractional dimensions (FD), were measured. MSN changes based on CT and FD measures were analyzed. Additionally, partial least squares (PLS) analysis was conducted to investigate the relationship between critical microstructural alterations and gene transcript expression levels.
Results
The WMT group exhibited reduced response times for updating, switching functions, and phonological loop tasks. The cortical morphological measurements revealed increases in CT in several right frontal regions, as well as FD in the frontopolar and middle frontal areas after WMT compared to baseline. Furthermore, significant decreases in MSN based on CT measures were found in specific occipital and intraparietal sulci. Similarly, the MSN of FD showed notable decreases in eigenvector and degree centrality in the left frontomarginal cortex and right middle temporal gyrus. PLS analysis revealed strong links between microstructural changes and gene expression, with PLS+ genes enriched in synaptic transmission, neural regulation, and energy metabolism, while PLS− genes were associated with intracellular transport, protein modification, and stress responses.
Conclusion
The findings highlight the subtle influences of WMT on brain structure and underlying biological processes, providing insights into its role in neural plasticity and suggesting potential genetic contributions to these structural changes.
Keywords: gene expression, morphometric similarity network, neural plasticity, neuroanatomy, working memory training
An 8‐week WMT reduced the reaction time of the memory task and increased CT and FD in specific brain regions. MSN analysis of CT and FD reveals notable nodal topological changes in certain areas. Additionally, PLS analysis revealed strong links between WMT‐induced microstructural changes and gene transcript expression.

1. Introduction
Working memory (WM) is an essential cognitive process that allows for the temporary storage and manipulation of information [1]. As a result of its fundamental significance in overall cognition, WM has attracted increased attention in efforts to achieve widespread cognitive improvement through extended training on WM tasks [2]. Recent research has indicated that WM training (WMT) not only enhances WM capacity [3, 4], but also has positive impacts on general fluid intelligence and attentional control [5, 6].
To date, numerous studies have focused on the application of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for detecting specific architectural changes resulting from WMT. Following WMT, researchers have observed structural changes, including an increase in fractional anisotropy (FA) measures in the white matter regions adjacent to the intraparietal sulcus [7], as well as an increase in gray matter volumes in the right superior parietal cortex [8]. Nevertheless, the majority of the studies involved only single MRI morphometric and anatomical features, such as cortical thickness, volume, and curvature [9, 10], which may neglect individual differences and fail to reveal specific alterations in cortical morphology.
Single‐subject morphometric similar network (MSN) has been developed to construct morphological brain networks at the individual level [11, 12, 13]. Recent studies have begun to explore the topological characteristics in single‐subject MSN in the research of normal brain and neuropsychiatric disorders [14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20]. For instance, Seidlitz et al. demonstrated that MSN provides a novel, robust, and biologically plausible approach to understanding how human cortical networks underpin individual differences in psychological functions [21]. Similarly, patients diagnosed with major depressive disorder exhibited increased nodal centralities in parietal regions, while experiencing decreased nodal centralities in the temporal regions, as indicated by cortical thickness‐based MSN [22]. These results suggest that individual‐level single‐subject MSN could serve as a meaningful and reliable tool to explore the human connectome, but have yet to be tried in WMT.
Additionally, genetic factors play a significant role in shaping the brain's structure and functionality [23, 24]. Transcription‐neuroimaging association studies have established a strong correlation between gene expression profiles and various aspects of brain function and structure [25, 26, 27]. These include measures such as spontaneous brain activity (e.g., amplitude of low‐frequency fluctuations and regional homogeneity) [28, 29, 30], anatomical measures (e.g., gray matter volume and cortical thickness) [31, 32, 33, 34], connectivity [35, 36, 37], and MSN [38, 39, 40]. The found enriched genes are associated with nervous system development, synaptic transmission, and metabolic processes in the brain [41, 42, 43]. Additionally, the individual morphological similarity between cortical areas has been found to be aligned with spatial expression patterns of certain important genes [40]. Combining MSN and AHBA transcriptomic datasets would provide insight into how WMT‐related neuroplasticity varies at the microscale architecture.
The current study builds on prior WMT research by focusing on cortical microstructure and MSN, which have not been extensively explored in previous studies. While earlier research primarily examined single MRI morphometric features like cortical thickness and volume, this study introduces MSN to capture individual‐level morphological brain networks. Additionally, the study integrates gene expression data to explore the biological mechanisms underlying WMT‐induced neuroplasticity, which is a novel contribution to the field. The combination of MSN and transcriptomic analysis provides a more comprehensive understanding of how WMT influences brain structure and function at both macroscopic and microscopic levels. This study aims to investigate two primary hypotheses: (1) that WMT induces measurable changes in the cortical microstructure and topological properties of MSN, particularly in regions associated with working memory; and (2) that these structural changes are correlated with anatomically patterned gene expression, reflecting the genetic underpinnings of WMT‐induced neuroplasticity. To test these hypotheses, we employed Partial Least Squares (PLS) regression to analyze the relationship between brain structural indicators and region‐specific gene expression profiles. This integrative approach, which combines neuroimaging and genomic data, has been methodologically validated in prior research [44, 45], and is expected to provide novel insights into the mechanisms through which WMT influences brain structure and function at both the macroscopic and molecular levels.
2. Methods
2.1. Participants
A total of 76 healthy participants were recruited for this study. They were equally divided into two groups: the WMT group and the control group, with each group consisting of 38 individuals. Two participants in the WMT group and two in the control group were excluded due to bad image quality. Finally, 36 participants from the WMT group and control group were included in this study, respectively (Figure 1). The sample size was calculated using G*Power software, with a statistical power (1‐β) of 0.90, an alpha level of 0.05, and a medium effect size (Cohen's d = 0.5). This calculation suggests that a total sample size of 36 would be sufficient to detect group differences in either matched pairs or independent tests. The following were the inclusion criteria: no prior medical treatment or drug use; normal eyesight without color blindness or weakness; no history of neurological or psychiatric diseases; and no use of alcohol, coffee, or other substances within 24 h of the pre‐ and post‐test. Individuals with any medical condition (such as pacemakers or certain metal implants) that might make an MRI scan inappropriate were not allowed to participate. Furthermore, participation was restricted to those who had already participated in other cognitive training programs or had a history of substance abuse.
FIGURE 1.

Flowchart of this study.
2.2. WMT Protocol
2.2.1. Running Memory Task
A computerized and standardized adaptive running memory task was used to perform WMT [46]. The task is commonly used to assess WM updating, which is a critical component of the central executive component of WM [47]. During the training assignments, a series of stimuli (locations, letters, and animals) were subsequently presented in the central region of a computer screen for a specific period (5, 7, 9, or 11). The participants were instructed to memorize the properties of the last three stimuli (e.g., animals) that appeared in each trial. They had to regularly update their memories, thereby engaging their WM. The training task consisted of 30 trials, broken into six segments of five trials each. Prior to the initiation of training, each item was displayed for a duration of 1750 ms. In the following block, the time was reduced by 100 ms for each participant who provided correct responses for three or more trials in a given block.
The length of the final segment a participant finished on a particular day determined the amount of training they received the following day. The participants were allocated an initial 30 min per day to complete the training, which was subsequently decreased to 20 min on the final day. The supervision of compliance with the training regimen was carried out using computerized WMT software, which recorded the training data of each participant. The training regimen consisted of 40 sessions per week over a period of 8 weeks, with five training days per week. The schedule included 3 days of exercise back‐to‐back, then 1 day of rest, 2 more days of exercise, and one final day of rest.
2.2.2. Simple Memory Task
A simple memory task was allocated to the control group. Every participant was obligated to complete a 90‐trial memory task on each training day, which occurred 5 days a week. A 300 ms fixation point was consistently displayed in the center of the screen during the whole task. Subsequently, an animal appeared in the center of the screen for a duration of 1750 ms. After being shown nine different animals as options, participants were assigned the challenge of recalling which animal had been presented earlier. Participants were asked to finish it as quickly as possible. The participants allocated an average of 10 min each day to the training.
2.2.3. Procedure
Upon providing demographic information and fulfilling online screening questionnaires, individuals who met the inclusion criteria were invited to the laboratory to do the pre‐test. The individuals who successfully completed the task were subsequently allocated at random to either the control or training cohort. Subsequently, during the course of the following 8 weeks, every participant attended the laboratory to carry out a total of 40 training sessions that aligned with their respective cohort. Participants returned at the end of the training session to complete the post‐test assignment. The theoretical foundation of the 8‐week training period has been supported by previous cognitive training research [48, 49, 50, 51].
2.3. Cognitive Assessments
2.3.1. Evaluation of the Near‐Transfer Effect
There are three specific assessments of cognitive function: the update function test (UFT), the inhibition function test (IFT), and the switching function test (SFT). These tests are considered near‐transfer tests since they closely relate to WM. Essentially, UFT involves participants memorizing a sequence of letters shown on the screen and then deciding if a later set of three letters matches the ones they remembered. This assessment measures their proficiency in updating. The IFT entails a Stroop task that requires participants to determine the bigger numerical value between two Arabic numerals of varied sizes, with an emphasis on value rather than physical size. This task assesses their capacity to suppress automatic responses. The SFT evaluates the capacity to shift attention between tasks. Participants distinguish the significance of red numerals and the evenness or oddness of blue digits in a scenario involving two tasks. The task specifics were thoroughly explained in a prior investigation [52].
2.3.2. Evaluation of the Far‐Transfer Effect
The far transfer effect tests, which include the visuospatial sketchpad test (VST) and the phonological loop test (PLT), are primarily intended to evaluate cognitive abilities associated with working memory training. The VST task requires participants to memorize the locations of black squares inside a 4 × 4 grid. Subsequently, they must determine if the final two squares match any of the previously displayed placements. This task assesses visuospatial memory and attention abilities. The phonological loop test (PLT) involves the retention of a series of capital letters and subsequently identifying whether a new lowercase letter matches any of the previous letters, hence assessing phonological processing ability. These specific tasks have been extensively described in previous studies [52].
2.4. Neuroimaging Data Acquisition and Processing
The high‐resolution 3D T1‐weighted structural MRI images were acquired by a 3.0 T scanner (GE Discovery MR 750, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, US). Specifically, the magnetization‐prepared rapid gradient‐echo sequence was used to obtain individual structural MRI images with the following parameters: repetition time = 8.1 ms; echo time = 3.2 ms; inversion time = 900 ms; flip angle = 100; field of view = 240 × 240 mm; matrix size = 256 × 256 mm; voxel size = 1 × 1 × 1 mm, with no gap.
The CAT12 toolbox (http://www.neuro.uni‐jena.de/cat/) was utilized to process all structural MRI images, following the Statistical Parametric Mapping software (SPM12, http://www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/spm/softwarespm12) framework. Briefly, the initial step involved segmenting individual structural pictures into distinct components: gray matter, white matter, and cerebrospinal fluid. Subsequently, the cortical thickness (CT) was estimated, and the central surface was reconstructed using a projection‐based thickness approach [53]. Furthermore, CAT12 enables the estimation of other morphological indices such as fractional dimension (FD), gyrification index (GI), and sulcus depth (SD). These indices were also computed for each participant using the default parameter settings. After getting the morphological maps, they were resampled onto the fsaverage template and smoothed with a Gaussian kernel that had a full width at half maximum (FWHM). More precisely, the CT maps of each individual were subjected to smoothing using a Gaussian kernel with a full width at half maximum (FWHM) of 15 mm. Similarly, additional surface maps, such as FD maps, were smoothed using a Gaussian kernel with an FWHM of 25 mm, as described by Ruan et al. [14]. The reason for using bigger filter sizes for the FD, GI, and SD maps is because these folding measures capture information from both sulci and gyri. Therefore, the filter size needs to be larger than the distance between a gyral crown and a sulcus.
2.5. Cortical MSN Calculation
2.5.1. Definition of Network Nodes
The cortical MSN matrices were computed to evaluate the similarity in cortical patterns among various brain areas using different morphological indicators. Within the matrices, the nodes served as representations of brain regions. A well‐applied Destrieux surface atlas was used to define nodes [54]. This atlas divides the cerebral cortex into 148 regions. Each region represented a node in the morphological similarity matrices. The Destrieux atlas was chosen for studying nodal features because it has been shown to be a good balance between the amount of computing needed and the consistency of results when examining individual cortical MSN [14].
2.5.2. Definition of Network Edges
Furthermore, the interregional similarity in the distribution of regional morphology was utilized to calculate the edges between the nodes. The edge estimations utilized the Jensen‐Shannon Divergence (JSD) approach, which was selected due to its ability to (1) quantify dissimilarity between probability distributions, (2) handle non‐linear relationships, and (3) avoid assumptions of normality. JSD is a type of Kullback–Leibler divergence (KLD) that quantifies the dissimilarity between two probability distributions. Initially, the values of all vertices within each node were extracted for each morphological index. Next, a probability density estimate was calculated for each node and morphological index by using a Gaussian kernel smoothing density function. To find the JSD, the probability density estimates were turned into probability distribution functions (PDFs). The KLDs between two PDFs P and Q are computed as:
where e is the natural base and , with n represents the number of sampling points used in the probability density estimate. In this study, n is equal to 28 for each node. The morphometric similarity (JSDs) was calculated by taking the square root of the JSD and then subtracting it from 1. It was defined as:
Where . Following the aforementioned methods, each participant yielded a total of four MSN matrices (148 × 148). The matrices had values representing the degree of similarity in morphology across distinct regions. This similarity ranged from 0 to 1, where a value of 0 indicated that two regional PDFs were completely different, and a value of 1 indicated that they were exactly the same.
2.6. Network Analysis
2.6.1. Threshold Method
The matrices were converted to binary networks using a thresholding process based on sparsity. Sparsity is the measure of the density of edges in a network, calculated as the ratio of the actual number of edges to the maximum number of possible edges. The sparsity‐based thresholding strategy guarantees an equal number of edges among participants and in each category of morphological brain networks. A range of sequential sparsity values from 0.02 to 0.4, with an interval of 0.02, was used to threshold each matrix [14].
2.6.2. Network Parameter Calculation
Both the global and nodal topological metrics of MSN were calculated with the NetworkX software package (https://networkx.org). The global metrics encompassed the global efficiency, local efficiency, clustering coefficient, and typical path length. The node‐centrality metrics, including degree centrality, betweenness centrality, and eigenvector centrality, were also calculated. Formulas, usages, and descriptions of these metrics are available in other sources [55]. The AUC for each metric was additionally computed to get a condensed numerical value for subsequent statistical analyses.
2.7. Gene Expression Correlation Analysis
2.7.1. Estimation of Regional Gene Expressions
The AUC for each metric was additionally computed to get a condensed numerical value for subsequent statistical studies. The data was processed using the practical pipeline described in the previous study [56]. Specifically, there were six processing steps to obtain a region gene expression matrix: (1) the probe‐to‐gene annotations were updated using the latest available information from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) using the Re‐Annotator package [57]; (2) probes that did not exceed background noise intensity in at least 50% of samples across all donors were filtered out; (3) the probe with the highest differential stability (DS) [58] across donors was selected; (4) samples were assigned to the regions of Destrieux atlas in terms of standard deviations [59] (< 2 standard deviations); (5) Expression values for each donor were normalized using a scaled robust sigmoid transform [60] to account for differences between samples and donor‐specific effects on gene expression; and (6) Genes were filtered based on DS to reduce donor‐specific variance, and the top 50% of genes with the highest DS were chosen for the main analysis. Due to the limited availability of right hemisphere data in the AHBA dataset, this study focused exclusively on the left hemisphere to reduce variability among regions. Ultimately, the gene expression matrix (74 regions × 8476 gene expression levels) was created by calculating the transcriptional level of each gene in each brain region of the left hemisphere.
2.7.2. Imaging‐Transcriptomic Analysis
Partial least squares (PLS) regression was used to examine the spatial correlations between neuroimaging indicator differences (posttraining vs. baseline) and transcriptional levels for all 8476 genes. Gene expression data (74 × 8476 matrix) was used as predictor variables; the cortical index (CT and FD) and topological metrics of MSN (degree centrality, betweenness centrality, and eigenvector centrality) difference values were used as response variables. The first component identified in the PLS analysis (PLS1) represented the linear combination of gene expression levels that exhibited the strongest correlation with neuroimaging indicator disparities. A permutation test was performed 5000 times to assess whether the PLS1 component explaining variations in the cortical index was significantly more than what would be anticipated by chance.
Following the acquisition of the PLS weights for each gene, a bootstrapping technique was employed to evaluate the stability of each gene. This involved generating 5000 bootstrap samples. The Z score was computed as the ratio of the weight to its bootstrap standard error for each gene. Following a one‐sample Z test and subsequent false discovery rate (FDR) correction (p < 0.05, z > 1.96), two gene lists were generated: one consisting of genes with significantly positive associations with cortical index differences (PLS1+), and another consisting of genes with significantly negative associations with cortical index differences (PLS1−).
2.7.3. Enrichment Analysis
The enrichment analysis for PLS1 genes was conducted using the gene ontology (GO) biological process in the web programm (https://biit.cs.ut.ee/gprofiler/gost) [61]. Two sets of genes (PLS+ and PLS−) were entered into the online platform separately to conduct overrepresentation analysis for Gene Ontology (GO) terms. A multigene list of meta‐analysis was performed to identify the common biological processes shared by two samples. All enrichment pathways obtained were adjusted using the FDR‐corrected threshold for statistical significance at a p‐value of less than 0.05.
2.8. Statistical Analysis
The JASP software (https://jasp‐stats.org) was utilized for statistical analysis. The Shapiro–Wilk test was employed to assess the normality of numerical data; if the p value from the test was greater than 0.05, the data were considered normally distributed. Data that do not meet a normal/Gaussian distribution were analyzed using non‐parametric test. The categorical variables were examined using Chi‐square tests. Two‐sample t‐tests were used for independent samples of continuous variables and the rank‐sum tests were used for non‐normally distributed data. The analysis of graph theory metrics involved the use of t‐tests, with adjustments made for multiple comparisons. These adjustments included the application of the FDR correction and the false positive correction method [62]; the latter was particularly for node‐specific metrics (using a threshold of p < 1/148 = 0.0067).
3. Results
3.1. Demographic and Cognitive Characteristics
The demographic characteristics, including age (19.139 ± 0.867 vs. 19.222 ± 0.542, t = 0.489, p = 0.626), sex (23/13 vs. 22/14, ×2 = 0.059, p = 0.808), and education level (13.972 ± 0.291 vs. 13.944 ± 0.410, t = 0.331, p = 0.741), were not significantly different between the WMT group and control group (Table 1).
TABLE 1.
Demographic characteristics of participants.
| WMT (n = 36) | Control (n = 36) | t (x 2) | p | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex (female/male) | 23/13 | 22/14 | 0.059 | 0.808 |
| Age (years) | 19.139 ± 0.867 | 19.222 ± 0.542 | 0.489 | 0.626 |
| Education (years) | 13.972 ± 0.291 | 13.944 ± 0.410 | 0.331 | 0.741 |
Following WMT, several cognitive tests showed significant changes within the WMT cohort (Figure 2). Specifically, the response times in the near‐transfer test, such as updating function (1043.769 ± 147.596 vs. 1149.000 ± 118.288, t = 2559, p = 0.014, q = 0.014) and switching function (693.231 ± 53.257 vs. 740.486 ± 67.091, t = 2.281, p = 0.027, q = 0.014), and far‐transfer test, such as phonological loop test (1004 ± 153.143 vs. 1133 ± 165.504, t = 2.367, p = 0.022, q = 0.044), became more quick in post‐training than in the baseline. But the accuracy of the tests did not show any difference within the group cohort or between the group cohorts.
FIGURE 2.

Cognitive assessment comparisons (near‐transfer test and far‐transfer effect) among groups. Control, control group; IFT, inhibition function test; PLT, phonological loop test; RT, response time; SFT, switching function effect; UFT, updating function test; VST, visuospatial test; WMT, working memory training group. FDR correction, *p < 0.05.
3.2. Cortical Morphology
During the analysis of cortical morphological measurements between different groups, specific cortical metrics such as cortical thickness (CT) and fractal dimension (FD) exhibited noticeable alterations within the WMT cohort (Figure 3). Specifically, the WMT group showed a significant increase in CT in some areas of the prefrontal cortices, such as the right superior frontal gyrus and sulcus, right middle sulcus, and right precentral sulcus, after the training compared to baseline. Likewise, an increase in the FD of specific cortical areas involved the bilateral transverse frontopolar regions, the left frontomarginal area, and the left middle frontal gyrus. But when examining other cortical morphological metrics such as SD and GI, no significant alterations were observed.
FIGURE 3.

Cortical morphological metrical comparisons of cortical thickness (CT) and fractional dimension (FD) among groups. False positive correction, **p < 0.01. Control, control group; FrM, Frontomargin; FrP, frontopole; MFG, middle frontal gyrus; MFS, middle frontal sulcus; PreCS, precentral sulcus; SFG, superior frontal gyrus; SFS, superior frontal sulcus; WMT, working memory training group.
3.3. Global Topological Metrics of MSN
Building on the established results of the cortical morphological metrics, MSN using CT and FD were further constructed. By employing global indices derived from graph theory, we evaluated several metrics such as global efficiency, local efficiency, clustering coefficient, and characteristic path length (Figure S1). The thorough analysis indicated that there were no notable disparities in these measures, both in pre‐ and post‐assessments within the WMT and control cohort, as well as in comparisons between the pre‐ and post‐assessments of different cohorts.
3.4. Nodal Topological Metrics of MSN
Nodal topological metrics within the CT MSN uncovered distinct alterations (Figure 4). Significantly, there was a reduction in betweenness centrality in the left middle occipital sulcus and right intraparietal sulcus during the post‐assessments after the working memory training, in comparison to the post‐assessment measurements of the control group.
FIGURE 4.

Nodal metric comparisons in the morphometric similarity network (MSN) of cortical thickness (CT) among groups. BC, between centrality; AUC, area of under the curve. False positive correction, **p < 0.01. Control, control group; IPS, intraparietal sulcus; MOS, middle occipital sulcus; WMT, working memory training group.
Significant findings were made regarding the left frontomarginal cortex inside the FD MSN, as depicted in Figure 5. After undergoing WMT, the region showed a drop in eigenvector centrality compared to the control group's post‐assessment metrics. In addition, the FD MSN showed a comparable pattern in the right middle temporal gyrus, with a drop in degree centrality observed in the post‐WMT assessment compared to the post‐control assessment (Figure 5).
FIGURE 5.

Nodal metric comparisons in morphometric similarity network (MSN) of fractional dimension (FD) among groups. AUC, area of under the curve; Control, control group; DC, degree centrality; EC, eigenvector centrality; FrM, Frontomargin; MTG, middle temporal gyrus; WMT, working memory training groupFalse positive correction, **p < 0.01.
3.5. Biological Process of Gene Enrichment
The PLS analysis revealed a strong correlation between changes in cortical morphological indices (CT and FD) and gene transcript expression levels, but not topological characteristics. Figure 6 displays the outcomes of functional annotation for two sets of genes associated with cortical morphological index changes.
FIGURE 6.

Functional enrichment of gene transcripts. Functional annotation of the biological processes (BP) for PSL + genes (A) and for PLS1‐ genes (B). Each node represents a BP term, and nodes are color‐coded by their functional category, as indicated in the legends. The connections between nodes reflect functional relationships.
Specifically, the genes in PLS+ showed a significant enrichment in biological processes including synaptic transmission and neural regulation, vesicle transport and membrane organization, and energy metabolism and mitochondrial function. While the genes in PLS− were mainly associated with biological processes including intracellular transport and membrane trafficking, protein localization and modification, stress responses, and DNA damage repair.
4. Discussion
This research assessed the effects of an 8‐week computerized WMT regimen on the cognitive performance and neuroimaging biomarkers, including cortical structure and the topological properties of MSN, in healthy adults. The results from the post‐training assessments demonstrate that the WMT group not only showed improved RTs in these transfer tasks, but significant changes were also observed in the microstructure plasticity of the brain. Considerable alterations were observed in cortical morphology, as evidenced by increases in CT and FD in specific brain regions, as well as nodal topological aspects of MSN in certain areas. Furthermore, the cortical morphological index changes were connected to specific gene expression, which provides a plausible biological rationale for the impact of WMT. These results imply that the training's duration and intensity were adequate to produce detectable neuroplastic alterations. These findings emphasize the capacity of WMT to enhance cognitive function and induce distinct morphological alterations in the brain.
4.1. Improvements in Cognitive Functions
WM is essential for performing daily cognitive tasks. Researches indicate that engaging in WMT can enhance both the capacity of working memory and the related cognitive abilities [3, 47]. Updating refers to the ability to substitute outdated information in WM, whereas switching refers to the capacity to smoothly transition between several tasks or modes of thinking. Improved proficiency in these domains indicates that WMT has the potential to enhance cognitive regulation and adaptability. In addition, WM is intricately associated with the understanding and generation of language [63]. There is evidence suggesting that WMT can facilitate verbal ability [64]. This means that an enhanced WM capacity can assist in more efficient processing and comprehension of language information [65]. The findings indicate that WMT has the potential to enhance performance not only in specific working memory tasks but also in broader cognitive domains.
4.2. Alterations in Cortical Morphology
The increase in CT after WMT in specific brain regions, including the superior frontal gyrus, superior and middle frontal sulcus, and precentral sulcus, indicates that the brain has the ability to undergo substantial neuroanatomical modifications beyond the developmental maturation period. Specifically, the superior frontal gyrus is a component of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, which has a significant impact on executive processes, WM, and the regulation of attention [66, 67, 68]. The superior frontal sulcus plays a role in advanced cognitive functions, such as reward processing, WM, executive function, and decision‐making [69, 70]. The precentral sulcus is a conspicuous groove located right in front of the precentral gyrus. It plays a key role in motor planning, execution, and control [71, 72, 73]. The middle frontal sulcus, situated within the middle frontal gyrus, is a component of the neural network that facilitates WM and executive functions [74, 75]. The observed increases in CT in these regions highlight the brain's extraordinary adaptability and its capacity to adjust and enhance through specific cognitive training.
Similarly, the WMT group exhibited an augmentation in the FD of the cortical surface in the frontopolar cortex, frontomarginal cortex, and middle frontal gyrus compared to the baseline measurements. A higher FD typically signifies a more complex cortical surface, indicating a higher level of neural connectivity and processing capacity. The frontopolar cortex, located at the frontmost section of the frontal lobes, is responsible for higher‐level cognitive processes such as executive control, decision‐making, and WM [76, 77, 78]. The frontomarginal cortex, situated at the rostral margin of the orbital part of the frontal lobe, is primarily associated with executive function, WM, decision‐making, and perspective‐taking [79, 80, 81]. The middle frontal gyrus, a critical structure of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, is responsible for WM and attention regulation [82, 83, 84, 85]. The observed increases in FD within these areas indicate that WMT may enhance the complexity and functional capacity of regions involved in executive functions and WM. Together, changes in cortical thickness and complexity might reflect neuroplastic adaptations in response to the cognitive demands of WMT and imply a potential structural basis for improvements in cognitive abilities following WMT. This aligns with existing evidence that adult individuals experience structural brain plasticity during the learning process [86, 87].
Our results indicate that WMT induces localized structural changes in specific regions associated with working memory and executive function rather than widespread structural changes. This aligns with previous literature showing that cognitive training often leads to changes in specific brain regions rather than widespread alterations across the entire brain [66, 71, 74, 77, 85]. For example, a longitudinal study by Nichols et al. found that specific cognitive task training resulted in changes in the microstructure of white matter in specific brain regions, with language suppression control training leading to changes in the left frontotemporal and occipital frontal bundle networks, and visual spatial working memory training leading to changes in the right frontal parietal lobe bundle, but there was almost no overlap in white matter microstructure changes between these two groups [88]. Additionally, studies by Draganski and May have demonstrated that training‐induced neuroplasticity tends to be region‐specific, reflecting the functional demands of the training tasks [89].
In particular, when examining other cortical morphological metrics such as SD and GI, no significant alterations were observed. The observed changes of CT and FD in our results aligns with their roles as dynamic markers of microstructural plasticity [50, 90]. In contrast, SD and GI, although important, are more influenced by stable developmental or genetic factors and are therefore less sensitive to short‐term interventions and may require longer longitudinal sampling [91, 92].
4.3. Alterations in Topological Characteristics of MSN
The absence of significant changes in the global indices of topological characteristics, such as global efficiency, local efficiency, clustering coefficient, and characteristic path length, indicates that WMT does not significantly disrupt the overall structural and fractal complexity‐based network organization. While numerous studies have demonstrated localized structural and functional changes associated with WMT, evidence for large‐scale network reorganization remains limited and inconsistent [93, 94]. The absence of significant changes in the global indices may suggest that 8 weeks WMT may primarily induce local rather than global neural adaptations. Melby‐Lervåg et al. concluded that WMT produces narrow, task‐specific neural effects rather than broad cognitive or network‐level changes [90]. Similarly, a 2024 meta‐analysis by Yao et al. found that the neural changes associated with the WM training effect occur in the frontoparietal network and dopamine‐related brain areas. Furthermore, combining the results on shorter (< 10 h) and longer (≥ 10 h) WM training, they demonstrated that the training dosage moderates the neural change of WM training effects [95]. Our findings provide support for this view. Namely, while 8 weeks WMT produces reliable local neural effects, its impact on global networks may require either longer training durations or complementary interventions to manifest detectable changes.
The reduced betweenness centrality in the intraparietal sulcus and middle occipital sulcus suggests a shift in the way that these regions communicate within MSN of CT. The intraparietal sulcus is involved in spatial attention and WM [96, 97], and it plays a crucial role in the integration of sensory information [98, 99]. Additionally, it is essential for tasks that involve visuospatial processing [100, 101]. The middle occipital sulcus plays a central role in visual processing [102] and is crucial for interpreting visual perception [103, 104]. The reduced betweenness centrality observed in the intraparietal and middle occipital sulcus after undergoing WMT suggests a possible restructuring of the brain's network in processing sensory information. This reconfiguration likely indicates a more effective cognitive processing mechanism in these areas, demonstrating the brain's ability to adapt to the cognitive requirements and training effects of WMT.
The frontomarginal cortex, as previously stated, is implicated in higher cognitive processes such as executive function and decision‐making. The middle temporal gyrus is involved in semantic processing, semantic priming, and semantic control [105, 106, 107]. Essentially, the decrease of centrality measures in the frontomarginal cortex and middle temporal gyrus within the MSN of FD after WMT suggests a specific reorganization in brain network dynamics. This reorganization is likely a result of adjustments in cognitive processing, specifically executive function, WM, and language, underpinned by neuroplastic changes. These adjustments highlight the brain's ability to reorganize itself in response to specific cognitive activities, with changes in network dynamics closely matching the cognitive functions of the afflicted regions.
4.4. Gene Enrichment for Biological Functions
The PLS analysis revealed distinct sets of genes associated with positive and negative weights (PLS+ and PLS−) in neuroimaging indicator changes (CT and FD) following WMT. These findings suggest that WMT modulates cortical morphological indices through diverse biological pathways, shedding light on the potential neurobiological mechanisms underlying cortical plasticity. Genes with positive weights (PLS+) were primarily enriched in processes related to synaptic transmission and neural regulation, vesicle transport and membrane organization, and energy metabolism and mitochondrial function. These findings align with the hypothesis that synaptic plasticity and enhanced energy metabolism play a central role in cortical reorganization induced by cognitive training. Specifically, synaptic transmission and neural regulation are fundamental processes that support communication between neurons and the remodeling of neuronal network activity [108]. These processes involve neurotransmitter release, plasticity‐related changes, and synaptic pruning. The observed enrichment of synaptic processes in PLS+ genes suggests that complex cognitive training‐induced cortical thickening and complexity are driven by enhanced synaptic efficiency and connectivity [109]. These changes are likely responsible for the observed improvements in cognitive performance. Vesicle transport and membrane organization govern the intracellular trafficking of neurotransmitters, proteins, and organelles [110], facilitating efficient synaptic signaling and maintaining neuronal homeostasis [111]. PLS+ enrichment in these processes highlights the role of intracellular transport in supporting the structural demands of neural plasticity [112]. Energy metabolism and mitochondrial function are vital for meeting the increased energetic demands of neuronal activity during training [113]. Mitochondria not only generate adenosine triphosphate but also regulate calcium signaling and oxidative stress [114, 115], both of which are essential for neural plasticity. The enrichment of energy metabolism‐related processes in PLS+ genes suggests that cortical plasticity changes are supported by heightened metabolic activity [116].
Genes with negative weights (PLS−) were primarily enriched in processes related to intracellular transport and membrane trafficking, protein localization and modification, stress responses, and DNA damage repair. These processes might reflect stress‐induced neural adaptations in response to prolonged cognitive demands. Processes related to intracellular transport and membrane trafficking maintain cellular homeostasis by recycling proteins, organelles, and membrane components [117]. The enrichment of PLS− genes in intracellular transport processes suggests a possible trade‐off between synaptic remodeling and homeostatic mechanisms. Protein localization and modification are critical for ensuring proper cellular function [118], particularly in dynamically adapting environments like those induced by cognitive training. Enrichment of PLS− genes in these processes suggests a compensatory mechanism where protein modifications and accurate localization help maintain cellular function amid training‐induced structural changes. These findings suggest that PLS+ genes reflect cortical plasticity promoted by WMT, while PLS− genes highlight compensatory mechanisms under increased neural demands, together revealing a dynamic balance underlying cortical morphological changes.
4.5. Clinical Implications
While the study focuses on healthy adults, the findings may have implications for clinical populations, such as individuals with aging‐related cognitive decline or neurodegenerative disorders like Alzheimer's disease. Working memory deficits are often found in aging individuals, especially in those with mild cognitive impairment or early stages of Alzheimer's disease [119, 120]. Normal aging is associated with the structural and functional brain changes that can affect cognitive domains including working memory [121]. For example, the increases in prefrontal cortical thickness and fractal dimension observed in the present study could suggest that WMT might help mitigate age‐related cortical thinning, which aligns with the findings that cognitive training can mitigate age‐associated structural brain changes in the elderly [122]. However, studies on computerized cognitive training programs in cognitive impairment individuals showed mixed results [123]. Further research is needed to determine whether these findings generalize to clinical populations.
4.6. Limitations
Firstly, we acknowledge that there are potential confounding factors (e.g., baseline cognitive ability, lifestyle factors), and future research should consider controlling for these factors to ensure that the observed effects are entirely attributable to WMT. Secondly, the PLS regression analysis identifies the correlation between morphological network node changes and AHBA gene expression. However, this represents only inferred correlations. In future research, we will consider validating our current findings using in vivo models, such as qPCR. Moreover, we acknowledge the limitation of focusing solely on the left hemisphere due to AHBA data constraints.
5. Conclusion
In summary, an 8‐week WMT program caused notable changes in the cortical microstructure and the topological characteristics of key nodes in the MSN in healthy individuals. These changes occurred in regions of the brain that are important for WM and gene transcriptional expression. These findings suggest that WMT has the potential to induce targeted neuroplasticity in the brain and provide integrative understanding of the underlying biological neural mechanisms.
Author Contributions
Tian Zhang performed the initial statistical analysis and wrote the first draft of the manuscript. Yuntao Gao and Yijun Li produced and organized the datasets. Lin Wu and Xinxin Lin conducted imaging data processing, and Yihou Hou assisted with preprocessing and visual checking. Wei He and Yuanqiang oversaw participant recruitment. Jun Jiang and Yuanjun Xie assisted in additional analyses and writing of the manuscript. Peng Fang and Yuanjun Xie provided feedback on the study design during the study implementation. All authors have contributed to and approved the final manuscript.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Supporting information
Figure S1: Global topological metrics comparisons in the morphometric similarity network (MSN) of cortical thickness (CT) and fractional dimension (FD) among groups.
Zhang T., Gao Y., Li Y., et al., “Neural Plasticity Induced by Working Memory Training: Insights From Cortical Microstructure and Transcriptional Profiles,” CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics 31, no. 8 (2025): e70479, 10.1111/cns.70479.
Funding: This work was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 32471081, 61806210), Shaanxi Provincial Natural Science Basic Research Program (2024JC‐YBQN‐0209, S2024‐JC‐QN‐2303), National Key Laboratory of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Technology (No. WR202420‐2) and Clinical Medicine and X Research Center Project (LHJJ24XL03).
Tian Zhang and Yuntao Gao contributed equally to this work.
Contributor Information
Jun Jiang, Email: jiang_mail@163.com.
Yuanjun Xie, Email: xieyuanj@gmail.com.
Peng Fang, Email: fangpeng@fmmu.edu.cn.
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
- 1. Baddeley A., “Working Memory: Theories, Models, and Controversies,” Annual Review of Psychology 63, no. 1 (2011): 1–29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Shipstead Z., Redick T. S., and Engle R. W., “Is Working Memory Training Effective?,” Psychological Bulletin 138, no. 4 (2012): 628–654. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Melby‐Lervåg M. and Hulme C., “Is Working Memory Training Effective? A Meta‐Analytic Review,” Developmental Psychology 49, no. 2 (2013): 270–291. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Schwarb H., Nail J., and Schumacher E. H., “Working Memory Training Improves Visual Short‐Term Memory Capacity,” Psychological Research 80, no. 1 (2016): 128–148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Peng J., Mo L., Huang P., and Zhou Y., “The Effects of Working Memory Training on Improving Fluid Intelligence of Children During Early Childhood,” Cognitive Development 43, no. 7 (2017): 224–234. [Google Scholar]
- 6. Sari B. A., Koster E. H., Pourtois G., and Derakshan N., “Training Working Memory to Improve Attentional Control in Anxiety: A Proof‐Of‐Principle Study Using Behavioral and Electrophysiological Measures,” Biological Psychology 121, no. 12 (2016): 203–212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Hikaru T., Sekiguchi A., Taki Y., et al., “Training of Working Memory Impacts Structural Connectivity,” Journal of Neuroscience 30, no. 9 (2010): 3297–3303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Miró‐Padilla A., Bueichekú E., Adrián‐Ventura J., et al., “Sustained and Transient Gray Matter Volume Changes After n‐Back Training: A VBM Study,” Neurobiology of Learning and Memory 178, no. 2 (2021): 107368. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Danielle S. B., “Hierarchical Organization of Human Cortical Networks in Health and Schizophrenia,” Journal of Neuroscience 28, no. 37 (2008): 9239–9248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Sanabria‐Diaz G., Melie‐García L., Iturria‐Medina Y., et al., “Surface Area and Cortical Thickness Descriptors Reveal Different Attributes of the Structural Human Brain Networks,” NeuroImage 50, no. 4 (2010): 1497–1510. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Galdi P., Blesa M., Stoye D. Q., et al., “Neonatal Morphometric Similarity Mapping for Predicting Brain Age and Characterizing Neuroanatomic Variation Associated With Preterm Birth,” NeuroImage: Clinical 25, no. 1 (2020): 102195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Fenchel D., Dimitrova R., Seidlitz J., et al., “Development of Microstructural and Morphological Cortical Profiles in the Neonatal Brain,” Cerebral Cortex 30, no. 11 (2020): 5767–5779. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Cai M., Ma J., Wang Z., et al., “Individual‐Level Brain Morphological Similarity Networks: Current Methodologies and Applications,” CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics 29 (2023): 3713–3724. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Ruan J., Wang N., Li J., et al., “Single‐Subject Cortical Morphological Brain Networks Across the Adult Lifespan,” Human Brain Mapping 44, no. 16 (2023): 5429–5449. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Lv Y., Wei W., Han X., et al., “Multiparametric and Multilevel Characterization of Morphological Alterations in Patients With Transient Ischemic Attack,” Human Brain Mapping 42, no. 7 (2021): 2045–2060. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Yin G., Li T., Jin S., et al., “A Comprehensive Evaluation of Multicentric Reliability of Single‐Subject Cortical Morphological Networks on Traveling Subjects,” Cerebral Cortex 33, no. 14 (2023): 9003–9019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Kong X.‐z., Liu Z., Huang L., et al., “Mapping Individual Brain Networks Using Statistical Similarity in Regional Morphology From MRI,” PLoS One 10, no. 11 (2015): e0141840. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Jiang J., Zhou H., Duan H., et al., “A Novel Individual‐Level Morphological Brain Networks Constructing Method and Its Evaluation in PET and MR Images,” Heliyon 3, no. 12 (2017): e00475. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Smith D. M., Kraus B. T., Dworetsky A., Gordon E. M., and Gratton C., “Brain Hubs Defined in the Group Do Not Overlap With Regions of High Inter‐Individual Variability,” NeuroImage 277 (2023): 120195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Wang H., Jin X., Zhang Y., and Wang J., “Single‐Subject Morphological Brain Networks: Connectivity Mapping, Topological Characterization and Test–Retest Reliability,” Brain and Behavior: A Cognitive Neuroscience Perspective 6, no. 4 (2016): e00448. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Seidlitz J., Váša F., Shinn M., et al., “Morphometric Similarity Networks Detect Microscale Cortical Organization and Predict Inter‐Individual Cognitive Variation,” Neuron 97, no. 1 (2018): 231–247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Qiu X., Li J., Pan F., et al., “Aberrant Single‐Subject Morphological Brain Networks in First‐Episode, Treatment‐Naive Adolescents With Major Depressive Disorder,” Psychoradiology 3 (2023): kkad017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Fornito A., Arnatkevičiūtė A., and Fulcher B. D., “Bridging the Gap Between Connectome and Transcriptome,” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 23, no. 1 (2019): 34–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Richiardi J., Altmann A., Milazzo A. C., et al., “Correlated Gene Expression Supports Synchronous Activity in Brain Networks,” Science 348, no. 6240 (2015): 1241–1244. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Xue K., Liang S., Yang B., et al., “Local Dynamic Spontaneous Brain Activity Changes in First‐Episode, Treatment‐Naïve Patients With Major Depressive Disorder and Their Associated Gene Expression Profiles,” Psychological Medicine 52, no. 11 (2022): 2052–2061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Cai M., Ji Y., Zhao Q., et al., “Homotopic Functional Connectivity Disruptions in Schizophrenia and Their Associated Gene Expression,” NeuroImage 289 (2024): 120551. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Ma J., Xue K., Wang X., et al., “Gray Matter Volume Abnormalities in Vascular Cognitive Impairment and Their Association With Gene Expression Profiles,” Meta‐Radiology 1, no. 3 (2023): 100035. [Google Scholar]
- 28. Zhu W. S., Zhu W., Liu F., et al., “Genes Associated With Spontaneous Brain Activity Changes in Clinically Different Patients With Major Depressive Disorder: A Transcription‐Neuroimaging Association Study,” CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics 29 (2023): 3913. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Xue K. Z., Xue K., Liang S., et al., “Local Dynamic Spontaneous Brain Activity Changes in First‐Episode, Treatment‐Naive Patients With Major Depressive Disorder and Their Associated Gene Expression Profiles,” Psychological Medicine 52, no. 11 (2022): 2052–2061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Liu S. Y., Liu S., Zhang C., et al., “Frequency‐Dependent Genetic Modulation of Neuronal Oscillations: A Combined Transcriptome and Resting‐State Functional MRI Study,” Cerebral Cortex 32, no. 22 (2022): 5132–5144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Li B., Lin Y., Ren C., Cheng J., Zhang Y., and Han S., “Gray Matter Volume Abnormalities in Obsessive‐Compulsive Disorder Correlate With Molecular and Transcriptional Profiles,” Journal of Affective Disorders 344 (2024): 182–190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Zhou Z. Y., Zhou Z., Wei D., et al., “Gene Transcriptional Expression of Cortical Thinning During Childhood and Adolescence,” Human Brain Mapping 44, no. 10 (2023): 4040–4051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Han Y., Yang Y., Zhou Z., et al., “Cortical Anatomical Variations, Gene Expression Profiles, and Clinical Phenotypes in Patients With Schizophrenia,” Neuroimage‐Clinical 39 (2023): 103451. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Shen C., Rolls E. T., Cheng W., et al., “Associations of Social Isolation and Loneliness With Later Dementia,” Neurology 99, no. 2 (2022): E164–E175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Chen J. Y., Chen J., Zhang C., et al., “Molecular Basis Underlying Functional Connectivity of Fusiform Gyrus Subregions: A Transcriptome‐Neuroimaging Spatial Correlation Study,” Cortex 152 (2022): 59–73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Li J., Seidlitz J., Suckling J., et al., “Cortical Structural Differences in Major Depressive Disorder Correlate With Cell Type‐Specific Transcriptional Signatures,” Nature Communications 12, no. 1 (2021): 1647. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Romme I. A. C., de Reus M. A., Ophoff R. A., Kahn R. S., and van den Heuvel M. P., “Connectome Disconnectivity and Cortical Gene Expression in Patients With Schizophrenia,” Biological Psychiatry 81, no. 6 (2017): 495–502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Zong X. F., Zong X., Zhang J., et al., “Virtual Histology of Morphometric Similarity Network After Risperidone Monotherapy and Imaging‐Epigenetic Biomarkers for Treatment Response in First‐Episode Schizophrenia,” Asian Journal of Psychiatry 80 (2023): 103406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Morgan S. E., Seidlitz J., Whitaker K. J., et al., “Cortical Patterning of Abnormal Morphometric Similarity in Psychosis Is Associated With Brain Expression of Schizophrenia‐Related Genes,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 116, no. 19 (2019): 9604–9609. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Seidlitz J., Váša F., Shinn M., et al., “Morphometric Similarity Networks Detect Microscale Cortical Organization and Predict Inter‐Individual Cognitive Variation,” Neuron 97, no. 1 (2018): 231–247.e7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Greenwood P. M., Parasuraman R., and Espeseth T., “A Cognitive Phenotype for a Polymorphism in the Nicotinic Receptor Gene CHRNA4,” Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 36, no. 4 (2012): 1331–1341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Potkin S. G., Turner J. A., Guffanti G., et al., “A Genome‐Wide Association Study of Schizophrenia Using Brain Activation as a Quantitative Phenotype,” Schizophrenia Bulletin 35, no. 1 (2009): 96–108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Ji Y., Zhang X., Wang Z., et al., “Genes Associated With Gray Matter Volume Alterations in Schizophrenia,” NeuroImage 225, no. 1 (2021): 117526. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Whitaker K. J., Vértes P. E., Romero‐Garcia R., et al., “Adolescence Is Associated With Genomically Patterned Consolidation of the Hubs of the Human Brain Connectome,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 113, no. 32 (2016): 9105–9110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Vértes P. E., Rittman T., Whitaker K. J., et al., “Gene Transcription Profiles Associated With Inter‐Modular Hubs and Connection Distance in Human Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Networks,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences 371, no. 1705 (2016): 20150362. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Zhao X., Zhou R., and Fu L., “Working Memory Updating Function Training Influenced Brain Activity,” PLoS One 8, no. 8 (2013): e71063. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Klingberg T., “Training and Plasticity of Working Memory,” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 14, no. 7 (2010): 317–324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Sala G. and Gobet F., “Cognitive Training Does Not Enhance General Cognition,” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 23, no. 1 (2019): 9–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Ericson J. and Klingberg T., “A Dual‐Process Model for Cognitive Training,” NPJ Science of Learning 8, no. 1 (2023): 12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Engvig A., Fjell A. M., Westlye L. T., et al., “Effects of Memory Training on Cortical Thickness in the Elderly,” NeuroImage 52, no. 4 (2010): 1667–1676. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Takeuchi H., Sekiguchi A., Taki Y., et al., “Training of Working Memory Impacts Structural Connectivity,” Journal of Neuroscience 30, no. 9 (2010): 3297–3303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Ma L., Chang L., Chen X., and Zhou R., “Working Memory Test Battery for Young Adults: Computerized Working Memory Assessment,” PLoS One 12, no. 3 (2017): e0175047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Dahnke R., Yotter R. A., and Gaser C., “Cortical Thickness and Central Surface Estimation,” NeuroImage 65, no. 1 (2013): 336–348. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Destrieux C., Fischl B., Dale A., and Halgren E., “Automatic Parcellation of Human Cortical Gyri and Sulci Using Standard Anatomical Nomenclature,” NeuroImage 53, no. 1 (2010): 1–15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Rubinov M. and Sporns O., “Complex Network Measures of Brain Connectivity: Uses and Interpretations,” NeuroImage 52, no. 3 (2010): 1059–1069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Arnatkeviciute A., Fulcher B. D., and Fornito A., “A Practical Guide to Linking Brain‐Wide Gene Expression and Neuroimaging Data,” NeuroImage 189 (2019): 353–367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Arloth J., Bader D. M., Röh S., and Altmann A., “Re‐Annotator: Annotation Pipeline for Microarray Probe Sequences,” PLoS One 10, no. 10 (2015): e0139516. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Hawrylycz M., Miller J. A., Menon V., et al., “Canonical Genetic Signatures of the Adult Human Brain,” Nature Neuroscience 18, no. 12 (2015): 1832–1844. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Burt J. B., Demirtaş M., Eckner W. J., et al., “Hierarchy of Transcriptomic Specialization Across Human Cortex Captured by Structural Neuroimaging Topography,” Nature Neuroscience 21, no. 9 (2018): 1251–1259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Fulcher B. D., Little M. A., and Jones N. S., “Highly Comparative Time‐Series Analysis: The Empirical Structure of Time Series and Their Methods,” Journal of the Royal Society Interface 10, no. 83 (2013): 20130048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Raudvere U., Kolberg L., Kuzmin I., et al., “G:Profiler: A Web Server for Functional Enrichment Analysis and Conversions of Gene Lists (2019 Update),” Nucleic Acids Research 47, no. W1 (2019): W191–W198. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Bassett D. S., Bullmore E. T., Meyer‐Lindenberg A., Apud J. A., Weinberger D. R., and Coppola R., “Cognitive Fitness of Cost‐Efficient Brain Functional Networks,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 106, no. 28 (2009): 11747. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Linck J. A., Osthus P., Koeth J. T., and Bunting M. F., “Working Memory and Second Language Comprehension and Production: A Meta‐Analysis,” Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 21, no. 4 (2014): 861–883. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Alloway T. P., Bibile V., and Lau G., “Computerized Working Memory Training: Can It Lead to Gains in Cognitive Skills in Students?,” Computers in Human Behavior 29, no. 3 (2013): 632–638. [Google Scholar]
- 65. Macnamara B. N. and Conway A. R. A., “Working Memory Capacity as a Predictor of Simultaneous Language Interpreting Performance,” Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition 5, no. 4 (2016): 434–444. [Google Scholar]
- 66. Frodl T., McCarthy H., and Skokauskas N., “Identifying a Consistent Pattern of Neural Function in Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder: A Meta‐Analysis,” Psychological Medicine 44, no. 4 (2014): 869–880. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Alvarez J. A. and Emory E., “Executive Function and the Frontal Lobes: A Meta‐Analytic Review,” Neuropsychology Review 16, no. 1 (2006): 17–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Li W., Qin W., Liu H., et al., “Subregions of the Human Superior Frontal Gyrus and Their Connections,” NeuroImage 78, no. 9 (2013): 46–58. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Heekeren H. R., Marrett S., Ruff D. A., Bandettini P. A., and Ungerleider L. G., “Involvement of Human Left Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Perceptual Decision Making Is Independent of Response Modality,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 103, no. 26 (2006): 10023–10028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Taylor S. F., Welsh R. C., Wager T. D., Luan Phan K., Fitzgerald K. D., and Gehring W. J., “A Functional Neuroimaging Study of Motivation and Executive Function,” NeuroImage 21, no. 3 (2004): 1045–1054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. Eichert N., Watkins K. E., Mars R. B., and Petrides M., “Morphological and Functional Variability in Central and Subcentral Motor Cortex of the Human Brain,” Brain Structure and Function 226, no. 1 (2021): 263–279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72. Daniel T., Karl Z., and Ivan T., “Differential Involvement of Parietal and Precentral Regions in Movement Preparation and Motor Intention,” Journal of Neuroscience 22, no. 20 (2002): 9024–9034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73. Hanakawa T., Immisch I., Toma K., Dimyan M. A., van Gelderen P., and Hallett M., “Functional Properties of Brain Areas Associated With Motor Execution and Imagery,” Journal of Neurophysiology 89, no. 2 (2003): 989–1002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74. Voorhies W. I., Miller J. A., Yao J. K., Bunge S. A., and Weiner K. S., “Cognitive Insights From Tertiary Sulci in Prefrontal Cortex,” Nature Communications 12, no. 1 (2021): 5122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75. Schroeter M. L., Vogt B., Frisch S., et al., “Executive Deficits Are Related to the Inferior Frontal Junction in Early Dementia,” Brain 135, no. 1 (2012): 201–215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76. Mansouri F. A., Koechlin E., Rosa M. G. P., and Buckley M. J., “Managing Competing Goals—A Key Role for the Frontopolar Cortex,” Nature Reviews Neuroscience 18, no. 11 (2017): 645–657. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77. Kim C., Kroger J. K., Calhoun V. D., and Clark V. P., “The Role of the Frontopolar Cortex in Manipulation of Integrated Information in Working Memory,” Neuroscience Letters 595, no. 5 (2015): 25–29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78. Laureiro‐Martínez D., Canessa N., Brusoni S., et al., “Frontopolar Cortex and Decision‐Making Efficiency: Comparing Brain Activity of Experts With Different Professional Background During an Exploration‐Exploitation Task,” Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 7 (2013): 927, 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00927. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79. Fjell A. M., Walhovd K. B., Fischl B., and Reinvang I., “Cognitive Function, P3a/P3b Brain Potentials, and Cortical Thickness in Aging,” Human Brain Mapping 28, no. 11 (2007): 1098–1116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80. Yoon J. H., Hoffman J. N., and D'Esposito M., “Segregation of Function in the Lateral Prefrontal Cortex During Visual Object Working Memory,” Brain Research 1184, no. 11 (2007): 217–225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81. Hynes C. A., Baird A. A., and Grafton S. T., “Differential Role of the Orbital Frontal Lobe in Emotional Versus Cognitive Perspective‐Taking,” Neuropsychologia 44, no. 3 (2006): 374–383. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82. Song P., Lin H., Liu C., et al., “Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to the Middle Frontal Gyrus During Attention Modes Induced Dynamic Module Reconfiguration in Brain Networks,” Frontiers in Neuroinformatics 13, no. 4 (2019): 22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83. Leung H., Gore J. C., and Goldman‐Rakic P. S., “Sustained Mnemonic Response in the Human Middle Frontal Gyrus During On‐Line Storage of Spatial Memoranda,” Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 14, no. 4 (2002): 659–671. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84. Andersson M., Ystad M., Lundervold A., and Lundervold A. J., “Correlations Between Measures of Executive Attention and Cortical Thickness of Left Posterior Middle Frontal Gyrus—A Dichotic Listening Study,” Behavioral and Brain Functions 5, no. 1 (2009): 41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85. Stawicka Z. M., Massoudi R., Oikonomidis L., et al., “Differential Effects of the Inactivation of Anterior and Posterior Orbitofrontal Cortex on Affective Responses to Proximal and Distal Threat, and Reward Anticipation in the Common Marmoset,” Cerebral Cortex 32, no. 7 (2022): 1319–1336. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86. Lövdén M., Wenger E., Mårtensson J., Lindenberger U., and Bäckman L., “Structural Brain Plasticity in Adult Learning and Development,” Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 37, no. 9 (2013): 2296–2310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87. Tymofiyeva O. and Gaschler R., “Training‐Induced Neural Plasticity in Youth: A Systematic Review of Structural and Functional MRI Studies,” Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 14, no. 1 (2021): 497245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88. Nichols E. S., Erez J., Stojanoski B., et al., “Longitudinal White Matter Changes Associated With Cognitive Training,” Human Brain Mapping 42, no. 14 (2021): 4722–4739. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89. Draganski B. and May A., “Training‐Induced Structural Changes in the Adult Human Brain,” Behavioural Brain Research 192, no. 1 (2008): 137–142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90. Melby‐Lervåg M., Redick T. S., and Hulme C., “Working Memory Training Does Not Improve Performance on Measures of Intelligence or Other Measures of “Far Transfer”: Evidence From a Meta‐Analytic Review,” Perspectives on Psychological Science 11, no. 4 (2016): 512–534. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91. Sowell E. R., Peterson B. S., Thompson P. M., Welcome S. E., Henkenius A. L., and Toga A. W., “Mapping Cortical Change Across the Human Life Span,” Nature Neuroscience 6, no. 3 (2003): 309–315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92. Panizzon M. S., Fennema‐Notestine C., Eyler L. T., et al., “Distinct Genetic Influences on Cortical Surface Area and Cortical Thickness,” Cerebral Cortex 19, no. 11 (2009): 2728–2735. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93. Sala G. and Gobet F., “Working Memory Training in Typically Developing Children: A Meta‐Analysis of the Available Evidence,” Developmental Psychology 53, no. 4 (2017): 671–685. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94. Constantinidis C. and Klingberg T., “The Neuroscience of Working Memory Capacity and Training,” Nature Reviews. Neuroscience 17, no. 7 (2016): 438–449. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95. Zhang Y., Fu J., and Zhao X., “Neural Correlates of Working Memory Training: An fMRI Meta‐Analysis,” NeuroImage 301 (2024): 120885. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96. Gillebert C. R., Mantini D., Thijs V., Sunaert S., Dupont P., and Vandenberghe R., “Lesion Evidence for the Critical Role of the Intraparietal Sulcus in Spatial Attention,” Brain 134, no. 6 (2011): 1694–1709. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97. Elena M. G. W., Peters B., Hahn T., Bledowski C., and Fiebach C. J., “Superior Intraparietal Sulcus Controls the Variability of Visual Working Memory Precision,” Journal of Neuroscience 36, no. 20 (2016): 5623–5635. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98. Olivier G., Wardak C., Ibarrola D., et al., “Multimodal Convergence Within the Intraparietal Sulcus of the Macaque Monkey,” Journal of Neuroscience 33, no. 9 (2013): 4128–4139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99. Buelte D., Meister I. G., Staedtgen M., et al., “The Role of the Anterior Intraparietal Sulcus in Crossmodal Processing of Object Features in Humans: An rTMS Study,” Brain Research 1217, no. 6 (2008): 110–118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100. van Eimeren T., Wolbers T., Münchau A., Büchel C., Weiller C., and Roman Siebner H., “Implementation of Visuospatial Cues in Response Selection,” NeuroImage 29, no. 1 (2006): 286–294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101. Maya L. R., Stern C. E., Michalka S. W., Devaney K. J., and Somers D. C., “Influences of Long‐Term Memory‐Guided Attention and Stimulus‐Guided Attention on Visuospatial Representations Within Human Intraparietal Sulcus,” Journal of Neuroscience 35, no. 32 (2015): 11358–11363. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102. Bertamini M., Silvanto J., Norcia A. M., Makin A. D. J., and Wagemans J., “The Neural Basis of Visual Symmetry and Its Role in Mid‐ and High‐Level Visual Processing,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1426, no. 1 (2018): 111–126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103. Isik A. I. and Vessel E. A., “Vessel From Visual Perception to Aesthetic Appeal: Brain Responses to Aesthetically Appealing Natural Landscape Movies,” Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 15 (2021): 676032, 10.3389/fnhum.2021.676032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104. R. P. Albert, III , Matthew A. H., and Mark T. W., “Neural Correlates of Multisensory Perceptual Learning,” Journal of Neuroscience 32, no. 18 (2012): 6263–6274. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105. Whitney C., Kirk M., O'Sullivan J., Lambon Ralph M. A., and Jefferies E., “The Neural Organization of Semantic Control: TMS Evidence for a Distributed Network in Left Inferior Frontal and Posterior Middle Temporal Gyrus,” Cerebral Cortex 21, no. 5 (2011): 1066–1075. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106. Liuba P., Beatrice A., and Angelika L., “The Large‐Scale Organization of Gestures and Words in the Middle Temporal Gyrus,” Journal of Neuroscience 39, no. 30 (2019): 5966–5974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107. Laufer I., Negishi M., Lacadie C. M., Papademetris X., and Constable R. T., “Dissociation Between the Activity of the Right Middle Frontal Gyrus and the Middle Temporal Gyrus in Processing Semantic Priming,” PLoS One 6, no. 8 (2011): e22368. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108. Fellin T., “Communication Between Neurons and Astrocytes: Relevance to the Modulation of Synaptic and Network Activity,” Journal of Neurochemistry 108, no. 3 (2009): 533–544. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109. Chapman S. B., Aslan S., Spence J. S., et al., “Neural Mechanisms of Brain Plasticity With Complex Cognitive Training in Healthy Seniors,” Cerebral Cortex 25, no. 2 (2015): 396–405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110. Ayala S., “Transport and Internal Organization of Membranes: Vesicles, Membrane Networks and GTP‐Binding Proteins,” Journal of Cell Science 107, no. 4 (1994): 753–763. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111. Kennedy M. J. and Ehlers M. D., “Organelles and Trafficking Machinery for Postsynaptic Plasticity,” Annual Review of Neuroscience 29, no. 1 (2006): 325–362. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112. Amtul Z. and Atta ur R., “Neural Plasticity and Memory: Molecular Mechanism,” Reviews in the Neurosciences 26, no. 3 (2015): 253–268. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113. Ding Q., Vaynman S., Souda P., Whitelegge J. P., and Gomez‐Pinilla F., “Exercise Affects Energy Metabolism and Neural Plasticity‐Related Proteins in the Hippocampus as Revealed by Proteomic Analysis,” European Journal of Neuroscience 24, no. 5 (2006): 1265–1276. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114. Bertero E. and Maack C., “Calcium Signaling and Reactive Oxygen Species in Mitochondria,” Circulation Research 122, no. 10 (2018): 1460–1478. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115. Watt I. N., Montgomery M. G., Runswick M. J., Leslie A. G., and Walker J. E., “Bioenergetic Cost of Making an Adenosine Triphosphate Molecule in Animal Mitochondria,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 107, no. 39 (2010): 16823–16827. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116. Hwang E., Portillo B., Grose K., Fujikawa T., and Williams K. W., “Exercise‐Induced Hypothalamic Neuroplasticity: Implications for Energy and Glucose Metabolism,” Molecular Metabolism 73 (2023): 101745. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117. Cho I., Jackson M. R., and Swift J., “Roles of Cross‐Membrane Transport and Signaling in the Maintenance of Cellular Homeostasis,” Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering 9, no. 2 (2016): 234–246. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118. Bauer N. C., Doetsch P. W., and Corbett A. H., “Mechanisms Regulating Protein Localization,” Traffic 16, no. 10 (2015): 1039–1061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119. Huntley J. D. and Howard R. J., “Working Memory in Early Alzheimer's Disease: A Neuropsychological Review,” International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry 25, no. 2 (2010): 121–132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120. Saunders N. L. and Summers M. J., “Attention and Working Memory Deficits in Mild Cognitive Impairment,” Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 32, no. 4 (2010): 350–357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121. Faraza S., Waldenmaier J., Dyrba M., et al., “Dorsolateral Prefrontal Functional Connectivity Predicts Working Memory Training Gains,” Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience 13 (2021): 592261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122. Kim G. H., Jeon S., Im K., et al., “Structural Brain Changes After Traditional and Robot‐Assisted Multi‐Domain Cognitive Training in Community‐Dwelling Healthy Elderly,” PLoS One 10, no. 4 (2015): e0123251. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123. Hernes S. S., Flak M. M., Løhaugen G. C. C., et al., “Working Memory Training in Amnestic and Non‐Amnestic Patients With Mild Cognitive Impairment: Preliminary Findings From Genotype Variants on Training Effects,” Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience 13 (2021): 624253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Figure S1: Global topological metrics comparisons in the morphometric similarity network (MSN) of cortical thickness (CT) and fractional dimension (FD) among groups.
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
