Skip to main content
. 2025 Apr 14;9:txaf050. doi: 10.1093/tas/txaf050

Table 4.

Carcass quality and yield characteristic of steers fed 10-G compared with non-supplemented control steers

TRT1
Item CON 10-G SEM P-value
Hot carcass weight, kg 414.7 413.2 1.94 0.16
Dressed yield, % 64.71 64.54 0.13 0.07
Longisimus muscle area, cm2 100.19 99.75 0.60 0.28
12th-rib fat depth, cm 1.30 1.29 0.03 0.96
Marbling Score2 429 427 3.98 0.62
EBF3, % 28.63 28.61 0.18 0.92
Quality grade, %
 Prime 0.77 1.21 - 0.10
 Choice 54.53 53.09 - 0.28
 Select 43.94 44.88 - 0.48
 Other 0.69 0.72 - 0.89
Yield grade, %
 YG 1 18.96 18.16 - 0.44
 YG 2 41.32 41.23 - 0.95
 YG 3 31.09 31.58 - 0.68
 YG 4 6.53 7.00 - 0.47
 YG 5 0.62 0.52 - 0.61

1Treatments included no DFM (direct-fed microbial) contained in the diet (CON) and a diet containing L. acidophilus, E. faecium, P. pentosaceus, L. brevis, and L. plantarum fed at 2 g/steer/d providing 1 × 109 CFU (10-G) (Life Products, Inc., Norfolk, NE).

2300 = Slight, 400 = Small, 500 = Modest, and 600 = Moderate.

3Empty body fat calculated using EBF, % = 17.76107 + (4.68142 × FT) + (0.01945 × HCW) + (0.81855 × QG) − (0.06754 × LMA), where FT = 12th-rib fat thickness in cm, HCW = hot carcass weight in kg, QG = quality grade (4 = Select, 5 = Choice−, 6 = Choice, 7 = Choice+, and 8 = Prime), and LMA = longissimus muscle area in cm2 (Guiroy et al., 2001).