Skip to main content
. 2025 Jul 17;16:1551831. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1551831

Table 5.

Model fit and hypothesis verification results.

Hypothesis Path λ S.E. C.R. Sig. Result
H1 Safety management = > Trust in the trainer 0.920 0.073 13.727 0.001 Accepted
H2 Safety management = > Training satisfaction 0.990 0.072 14.402 0.001 Accepted
H3 Safety management = > Continuing exercise −0.832 1.905 −0.502 0.616 Rejected
H4 Trust in the trainer = > Continuing exercise 1.075 0.287 4.406 0.001 Accepted
H5 Training satisfaction = > Continuing exercise 0.501 1.711 0.323 0.747 Rejected
R2: Trust in the trainer 0.980
R2: Training satisfaction 0.847
R2: Continuing exercise 0.609
Model fit X2 = 318.922, df = 147, p < 0.001, SRMR = 0.042, TLI = 0.932, CFI = 0.941, RMSEA = 0.076.

λ, Unstandardized Regression Weights; S.E., Standard Error; CR(t), Critical Ratio.