Table 5.
Model fit and hypothesis verification results.
Hypothesis | Path | λ | S.E. | C.R. | Sig. | Result | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
H1 | Safety management | = > | Trust in the trainer | 0.920 | 0.073 | 13.727 | 0.001 | Accepted |
H2 | Safety management | = > | Training satisfaction | 0.990 | 0.072 | 14.402 | 0.001 | Accepted |
H3 | Safety management | = > | Continuing exercise | −0.832 | 1.905 | −0.502 | 0.616 | Rejected |
H4 | Trust in the trainer | = > | Continuing exercise | 1.075 | 0.287 | 4.406 | 0.001 | Accepted |
H5 | Training satisfaction | = > | Continuing exercise | 0.501 | 1.711 | 0.323 | 0.747 | Rejected |
R2: Trust in the trainer | 0.980 | |||||||
R2: Training satisfaction | 0.847 | |||||||
R2: Continuing exercise | 0.609 | |||||||
Model fit | X2 = 318.922, df = 147, p < 0.001, SRMR = 0.042, TLI = 0.932, CFI = 0.941, RMSEA = 0.076. |
λ, Unstandardized Regression Weights; S.E., Standard Error; CR(t), Critical Ratio.