Skip to main content
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 2002 Jul 1;99(14):9474–9479. doi: 10.1073/pnas.132552699

Knockout of the α1A/C-adrenergic receptor subtype: The α1A/C is expressed in resistance arteries and is required to maintain arterial blood pressure

D Gregg Rokosh 1,*, Paul C Simpson 1,
PMCID: PMC123165  PMID: 12093905

Abstract

α1-adrenergic receptors (ARs) play a major role in blood pressure regulation. The three α1-AR subtypes (A/C, B, and D) stimulate contraction of isolated arteries, but it is uncertain how different subtypes contribute to blood pressure regulation in the intact animal. We studied the role of the α1A/C subtype by using gene knockout. α1A/C knockout (KO) mice were viable and overtly normal. The LacZ reporter gene replaced α1A/C coding sequence in the KO, and β-galactosidase staining was present in resistance arteries and arterioles, but not in the thoracic aorta or its main branches. By tail cuff manometer and arterial catheter in conscious mice, α1A/C KO mice were hypotensive at rest, with an 8–12% reduction of blood pressure dependent on α1A/C gene copy number. A61603, an α1A/C-selective agonist, caused a pressor response that was lost in the KO and reduced but significant in heterozygous mice with a single copy of the α1A/C. A subtype-nonselective agonist [phenylephrine (PE)] caused a pressor response in KO mice, but the final arterial pressure was only 85% of wild type. The baroreflex was reset in the KO, and heart rate variability was decreased. After baroreflex blockade with atropine, PE increased blood pressure but did not change heart rate. Cardiac and vascular responses to the β-AR agonist isoproterenol were unchanged, and the arterial lumen area was not altered. We conclude that the α1A/C-AR subtype is a vasopressor expressed in resistance arteries and is required for normal arterial blood pressure regulation. α1A/C-selective antagonists might be desirable antihypertensive agents.


The sympathetic nervous system plays a major role in blood pressure regulation by modulating cardiac and vascular contractility. Sympathetic effects are mediated by catecholamines acting on G protein-coupled adrenergic receptors (ARs) in three families, β, α2, and α1. Vascular contraction is controlled primarily by α1-ARs, and their importance in blood pressure regulation is emphasized by the efficacy of α1-AR antagonists in human hypertension, a major medical problem (1, 2).

The α1-AR family includes three cloned subtypes, A/C, B, and D, which are transcribed at variable levels in different tissues (3). All three α1-AR subtypes can mediate constriction in many isolated arteries (4, 5). This complexity and the lack of subtype antagonists with sufficient selectivity have so far made it impossible to define the role of any individual α1-AR subtype in blood pressure regulation in the intact animal.

Distinct roles of α1-AR subtypes in blood pressure regulation might be important clinically. In the recent, large Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT), a nonselective α1-AR antagonist was an effective antihypertensive agent, but it was associated with an important adverse side effect, an increased incidence of heart failure, raising concern about the use of these drugs in treating hypertension or prostate disease (1, 2, 6, 7). Further, nonselective α1-AR antagonists can cause orthostatic hypotension and dizziness (1). A subtype-selective agent might treat hypertension without these adverse cardiac and vascular side effects.

The gene knockout approach has been useful in resolving the roles of individual AR subtypes in blood pressure regulation, demonstrating that the β2-AR subtype mediates hypotension, whereas the α2B-AR subtype causes hypertension (8). However, knockout of the α1B subtype has no effect on resting blood pressure (9), and there is controversy as to whether this subtype increases blood pressure in vivo (10).

In this study, we used the knockout approach to test the role in blood pressure regulation of one α1-AR subtype, the α1A/C. We replaced the first exon of the α1A/C with the LacZ gene, encoding β-galactosidase. We could thus test for receptor expression in arteries controlling blood pressure. We measured blood pressure and heart rate in conscious animals by tail cuff manometer, carotid arterial catheter, and ECG telemeter, at rest and after infusion of sympathetic and parasympathetic drugs.

Methods

Targeted Deletion of the α1A/C.

The mouse α1A/C gene was cloned from a 129/SvJ mouse genomic library (11). The targeting vector (Fig. 1A) contained a 5′ arm of ≈1.1 kb and a 3′ arm of ≈6.5 kb. Homologous recombination replaced the first exon and 415 bp of the intron, including the splice donor, with the Escherichia coli β-galactosidase gene LacZ and the neomycin-resistance gene driven by the phosphoglycerate kinase promoter. The LacZ cassette contained a stop codon and an SV40 polyadenylation signal. RW-4 129/SvJ mouse embryonic stem cells (Genome Systems, St. Louis) were electroporated and selected for neomycin resistance, and 5 of 196 clones contained the appropriate short-arm insertion by PCR and sequencing (not shown). Two clones had correct 3′ insertion and no random insertions by Southern analysis with external and LacZ probes (not shown). Targeted cells were injected into C57BL/6 blastocysts to obtain three chimeras >90% mosaic. Two chimeras from a single clone transmitted the targeted allele through the germ line when bred into FVB/N and C57BL/6 backgrounds. Mice in this study were from filial (F) generations 2–5 in the FVB/N background. Wild-type (WT) littermates were controls. Routine genotyping was by PCR with a common α1A/C 5′-flanking primer (AGCTAACCATTTCAGCAAAGA) and specific 3′ primers against exon 1 (CAAGATCACCCCAAGTAGAAT) and LacZ (TAACCGTGCATCTGCCAGTTT).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Targeted deletion of exon 1 of the α1A/C-adrenergic receptor gene. (A) Targeting strategy. A LacZ-Neo cassette replaced exon 1 of the α1A/C and introduced an EcoRV site. (B) Southern with EcoRV in an F2 litter. Probe B reveals a 16-kb band with the WT allele and a 11.2-kb band with the KO. Probe A to exon 1 is negative in the KO. (C) RT-PCR. Primers from exons 1 and 2 (arrows) were used with 0.5 μg of total RNA from heart and brain. Ethidium bromide staining shows a 524-bp product in WT but not in KO (Upper), as confirmed by Southern with a probe to exon 1 (Lower). (D) β-Galactosidase in E12.5 embryos. Blue staining of E. coli β-galactosidase is proportional to LacZ copy number in WT (no copies), Het (one copy), and KO (two copies).

Reverse Transcription (RT)-PCR and RNase Protection.

RNA was isolated from tissues rinsed in PBS and homogenized (Polytron) in Trizol (GIBCO/BRL). For RT-PCR, cDNA was transcribed with an α1A/C-specific 3′ primer within the sixth transmembrane domain in exon 2 (ACTTCCATTCACGGAGTCCATC), then amplified by PCR with a 5′ primer from the fifth transmembrane domain in exon 1 (CGACAAGTCAGACTCAGAGCAAG) (see Fig. 1A). RNase protection assays for α1-AR subtype mRNAs used 25 μg total RNA with rat probes (3, 12).

Radioligand Binding.

A 100,000 × g pellet was used in binding (12). Reactions contained 50–100 μg protein and [methoxy-3H]prazosin (70–87 Ci/mmol, NEN; 1 Ci = 37 GBq), 0.4–2 nM for saturation binding and 0.5 nM in competition binding with 5-methylurapidil (0.1 nM to 50 μM, Sigma RBI #U101). Ten micromolar phentolamine (Sigma RBI #P131) defined nonspecific binding. Data were analyzed with prism (GraphPad, San Diego).

β-Galactosidase.

To localize E. coli β-galactosidase in situ, the left carotid artery was catheterized under isoflurane anesthesia, and the mouse was euthanized by thoracotomy and incision of the left atrium. PBS (pH 7.3) was perfused at 2.5 ml/min to clear blood. Then 22.5 ml of 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS pH 7.3 was perfused, incubated 60 min at room temperature, and washed out with PBS. Forty milliliters of staining solution was next perfused [1 mg/ml X-gal/5 mM K3Fe(CN)6/5 mM K4Fe(CN)6·3H2O/2 mM·MgCl2/0.02% Nonidet P-40/0.01% deoxycholate in PBS with 40 mM Tris base (pH 7.3)], incubated for 36 h at 30°C, washed out with PBS, and postfixed in 10% buffered formalin. Arteries were dissected and examined with a Zeiss SV11 stereomicroscope and a Spot digital camera. Skin was embedded in paraffin, sectioned at 5 μm, and stained with hematoxylin/eosin. β-Galactosidase activity in tissues was measured by the Galacto-Star Chemiluminescent System (Tropix/Applied Biosystems); and β-galactosidase protein, by Western blot with a monoclonal antibody (Promega).

Blood Pressure and Heart Rate (HR).

Tail cuff systolic blood pressure and HR were measured using a noninvasive computerized tail cuff system (BP-2000, VisiTech Systems, Apex, NC; ref. 13). Mice were trained for 3 days, then systolic blood pressure was taken as the mean of 6–12 daily readings, with at least 15 of 20 successful each day. For intraarterial pressure (14), the left carotid artery and right internal jugular vein were catheterized under isoflurane anesthesia with sterile PE-10 tubing filled with heparin (100 units/ml) in saline. Catheters were sealed, tunneled to the back, and coiled in a s.c. pouch. After at least 24 h recovery from surgery, the carotid catheter was connected to a low compliance dome pressure transducer (Cobe Laboratories, Lakewood, CO), and the mice were allowed to move freely in a 36 inches2 enclosure. The internal jugular vein catheter was connected to a switching valve with low dead volume for drug infusion. Pressure waveforms were acquired at 500 Hz and transformed simultaneously to mean arterial pressure (MAP) and HR, and reduced to 10-s means (MPS100, Biopac, Santa Barbara, CA). Baseline MAP and HR were established over 40–60 min, then drugs were infused (volumes, 0.2–2.0 μl/g at 1–5 μl/s) in the order A61603 (Tocris Pharmaceuticals #1052), phenylephrine (PE; Sigma #P6126), isoproterenol (Sigma #I6405), and atropine (Sigma #A0257). The peak drug response was at ≈1 min (≈2 min for atropine), and the duration was ≈5 min (longer for atropine). Before each drug was given, the preinfusion baseline was reestablished, except in experiments with baroreflex blockade, where PE and A61603 were given 4 min after atropine. The mean of the 2-min period immediately before infusion was taken as baseline, and the 10-s mean peak response was the treatment value.

Blood Chemistries and Cardiovascular Structure.

Blood was drawn from the ventricle under isoflurane anesthesia, and serum electrolytes, blood cell counts, and indices of renal function were assayed in the clinical laboratory of the San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center. Organ wet weights were measured at necropsy. Arteries were fixed in situ by perfusion with 10% buffered formalin at 80 mm Hg and sectioned at a set distance from the aorta (in mm: right carotid 2, celiac 1.5, mesenteric 1, right renal 1). Sections were examined with a Nikon SMZ800 stereomicroscope, and lumen area was quantified with NIH IMAGE V.1.61/PPC; the mean of three measurements was used for each artery.

Echocardiography.

Echocardiography under anesthesia with isoflurane was performed as described (15).

HR Variability.

The supporting information (which is published on the PNAS web site, www.pnas.org) describes implantation of ECG telemeters, drug injections in conscious mice 1 week after surgery, and data analysis.

Statistics.

Mean values ± SE are shown and were compared by an unpaired t test or ANOVA followed by Fischer probable least-squares difference (PLSD).

Results

Generation and Confirmation of the α1A/C-AR KO.

Targeting replaced exon 1 of the α1A/C with Lac Z (Fig. 1A) and introduced an EcoRV site that was used for genotyping (Fig. 1B). Intercrosses of heterozygous F1 mice transferred the targeted allele to both sexes with expected Mendelian frequency in two backgrounds, FVB/N (Fig. 1B Upper) and C57BL/6 (not shown). Exon 1 DNA, which encodes the receptor through transmembrane domain 5, was absent in the KO (Fig. 1B Lower), and α1A/C mRNA was not detected by RT-PCR (Fig. 1C) or by RNase protection (not shown).

α1-AR binding in KO mice was reduced by just over 50% in brain and kidney and by ≈30% in heart (Table 1). In WT mice, 5-methylurapidil, which has higher affinity for the α1A/C than the α1B or α1D, produced shallow competition curves that best fit a two-site model, with Hill coefficients 0.4–0.6 (Table 1). In KO mice the curves best fit a one-site model, with Hill coefficients shifted significantly toward unity (Table 1). The fraction of high-affinity α1 sites lost in the KO was in good agreement with the reduction of total α1 sites (Table 1). α1B mRNA levels were unchanged in the KO heart by RNase protection (data not shown). These results confirmed that the α1A/C receptor was absent in KO mice, and also suggested that there were no major compensatory changes in the other subtypes.

Table 1.

α1-AR radioligand binding in α1A/C KO mice

Brain
Heart
Kidney
WT KO WT KO WT KO
Bmax, fmol/mg 137  ± 14 62  ± 2* 14  ± 1 10  ± 2* 56  ± 2 24  ± 3*
 KO/WT, % 45 70 42
Ki high (nM) 0.6  ± 0.2 None 1.1  ± 0.7 None 2.0  ± 0.7 None
 High/total, % 48  ± 3 0 21  ± 2 0 65  ± 3 0
Ki low, nM 86  ± 18 69  ± 12 193  ± 50 280  ± 113 292  ± 67 231  ± 25
Hill coefficient 0.39  ± 0.03 0.91  ± 0.03* 0.61  ± 0.05 1.12  ± 0.08* 0.45  ± 0.02 0.85  ± 0.04*

Membranes from tissues of mice aged 12–16 weeks were used in binding reactions with [3H]prazosin. Sites with high affinity for 5-methylurapidil (the α1A/C) were determined by competition. Values are from six mice of each genotype, three male and three female. There were no differences in binding between sexes of either genotype (data not shown). 

*

, P < 0.05 vs. WT. 

Because Lac Z was inserted at the α1A/C translational start site (Fig. 1A, NcoI site), β-galactosidase expression was controlled by endogenous α1A/C regulatory elements. Staining of E12.5 embryos showed an appropriate increase in blue intensity with LacZ copy number (Fig. 1D). β-galactosidase staining was absent in WT mice (Fig. 1D and not shown). In heart and brain, β-galactosidase enzyme activity and protein by Western blot were also proportional to LacZ copy number (not shown). In addition, β-galactosidase was present in the KO (not shown) in the same adult tissues where α1A/C mRNA was present in WT mice, including brain, heart, and kidney (11). Staining was absent in liver (embryo in Fig. 1D, adult not shown), where the α1A/C receptor is absent (11). These results indicated that β-galactosidase in KO mice was a valid surrogate to localize the sites of normal α1A/C transcription.

Expression of the α1A/C in Resistance Arteries.

We used β-galactosidase staining in the KO to localize α1A/C expression in the vasculature (Fig. 2). Staining was absent in the thoracic aorta and its major branches, including the carotid arteries (Fig. 2A), and in the proximal pulmonary artery and the superior and inferior vena cavae (not shown). β-Galactosidase expression was observed at low levels in the abdominal aorta just above the level of the celiac artery (Fig. 2B), particularly around branch artery origins (Fig. 2C). Staining became prominent lower in the aorta and in the celiac, renal, mesenteric, hepatic, splenic, gastric, testicular, ovarian, iliac, femoral, and tail arteries (Fig. 2 BD and not shown). Remarkably, in medium arteries such as celiac and renal, staining was markedly heterogeneous in a circumferential pattern (Fig. 2 C and D). Strong expression of β-galactosidase was also seen in the skin, in ≈20-μm dermal arterioles near hair follicles (Fig. 2 E and F). These results suggested that the α1A/C was expressed normally in the gut, renal, and skin circulations. These vascular beds have major roles in blood pressure control (16).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

β-Galactosidase staining localizes arterial expression of the α1A/C. β-Galactosidase was stained in situ (blue), and the major arteries (AD) or skin from the chest (E) were dissected and photographed. Skin in E is from the epidermal side after removing the fur. (F) A skin section was counterstained with hematoxylin and eosin to show a hair follicle.

Hypotension in the α1A/C KO.

Given the localization of the α1A/C in arteries controlling overall vascular resistance, we measured blood pressure in KO mice, using two different techniques in conscious mice, tail cuff manometer, and carotid artery catheter. KO mice were hypotensive, with a significant ≈10–15 mm Hg reduction in blood pressure (≈8–12% of WT; Table 2). Carotid artery pressures were higher than tail cuff pressures in both WT and KO mice, and WT values were in the range seen in other studies (13). Heterozygous (Het) mice were intermediately hypotensive, indicating that the normal α1A/C contribution to blood pressure required receptors expressed from both alleles. Tail cuff pressure was also lower in a smaller cohort of KO mice in the C57BL/6 background, F2 males age 12–16 weeks (WT 106 ± 4, KO 94 ± 1 or 89% of WT, n = 6, P = 0.02). Heart rate in the KO was slightly but not significantly higher (Table 2; see below).

Table 2.

Blood pressure and HR in conscious α1A/C KO mice

Tail cuff manometer
Male
Female
Carotid artery catheter
WT KO WT KO WT Het KO
Systolic blood pressure, mmHg 114  ± 2 104  ± 5* 111  ± 2 102  ± 3*
 KO/WT, %  91  92
Mean arterial pressure, mmHg 138  ± 3 127  ± 6* 121  ± 3*
 KO/WT, % 92  88
Heart rate, beats per min 602  ± 10 636  ± 28 604  ± 14 630  ± 6 568  ± 33 565  ± 38 624  ± 16
 KO/WT, % 106 104 99 110
N mice 12   5 9  10 9  6   8

Blood pressure and heart rate were measured in conscious mice by tail cuff manometer or carotid artery catheter. Mice used for tail cuff were male and female F4 aged 20–28 weeks, and mice for catheterization were female F3 aged 16–20 weeks. 

*

, P < 0.05 vs. WT of same sex. 

Blood pressure is determined by both cardiac output and vascular resistance (17). Thus, we considered the possibility that hypotension in KO mice was due to reduced cardiac output. KO mice of both sexes bred normally, gained body weight identical to WT mice, and had no obvious diseases to at least 12 months of age. Heart weight was identical in KO and WT (heart weight in mg per body weight in gm; female WT 4.2 ± 0.2, KO 4.4 ± 0.3, n = 8–10, P = not significant; male WT 4.4 ± 0.1, KO 4.4 ± 0.2, n = 3–5, P = not significant). Heart histology was normal (not shown). Heart function by echocardiography was identical in WT and KO, with ejection fraction 64–66% and fractional shortening 30–31% (n = 5–7 of each sex in each genotype, P = not significant; D.G.R., A. Nakamura, E. Foster, and P.C.S., unpublished data). Function of isolated cardiac muscle was normal (25). Thus, there was no evidence for cardiac dysfunction in KO mice. Weights of other major organs were identical to WT, both absolute and normalized to body weight, including lungs, kidneys, and liver (data not shown). Serum levels of sodium, potassium, chloride, bicarbonate, urea nitrogen, and creatinine were the same as WT (data not shown), suggesting that renal function was normal. Blood cell counts were normal (data not shown). Thus, there was no evidence for a nonvascular cause of hypotension.

α1-AR Pressor Responses in the α1A/C KO.

To determine whether reduced vascular resistance caused hypotension in KO mice, we studied the pressor response to infusion of α1-AR agonists in chronically instrumented, conscious mice (Fig. 3). In WT mice, A61603, an agonist selective for the α1A/C (18), increased MAP by 35 mm Hg, or 25% over basal, with an EC50 0.3 μg/kg (Fig. 3 Left). In KO mice, A61603 had no effect (Fig. 3 Left), confirming the selectivity of A61603 in vivo, and indicating that the α1A/C receptor was a potent vasopressor in the normal mouse. In Het mice, A61603 stimulated an increase in MAP identical to WT (35 mm Hg, Fig. 3B). The dose–response relationship (Fig. 3B) and time course (not shown) were also identical in Het and WT. However, the final MAP was 15 mm Hg lower in the Het (85% of WT; Fig. 3A). These results confirmed the vasoconstrictor efficacy of the α1A/C and agreed with the intermediate effect of the Het on resting blood pressure (Table 2).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Carotid artery pressure with A61603 and PE in conscious α1A/C KO mice. Drugs were infused through a right jugular vein catheter in conscious, unrestrained mice 24 h after catheterization of the left carotid artery. Mice were the same as Table 2 (Carotid artery catheter). In A, the zero dose values were with 50 μl of saline.

PE, a subtype nonselective α1-AR agonist, in WT mice caused an increase in MAP similar to that seen with A61603, with an EC50 8 μg/kg (Fig. 3 Right). The final MAP was slightly but insignificantly lower with PE than A61603 (Fig. 3), possibly reflecting some β-adrenergic vasodilator effect of the higher PE doses (see below). In KO and Het mice, PE stimulated an increase in MAP similar to WT (Fig. 3B), but the final MAP was 10–15% lower (Fig. 3A). Thus, both copies of the α1A/C were required to reach maximum levels of MAP with α1-AR agonist infusion, but the α1B and/or α1D subtypes could increase blood pressure when the α1A/C was knocked out.

Altered Baroreflex in the KO.

Normally, an increase in blood pressure causes a decrease in HR through the parasympathetic baroreflex. In KO mice, higher doses of PE caused less bradycardia than in WT mice (Fig. 4 Upper). A plot of the relationship between MAP and HR showed a significant parallel left shift in the baroreflex in KO mice (Fig. 4 Lower). This resetting of the baroreflex meant that HR was lower for any given pressure, and could account for the insignificant increase in HR in the KO, despite significant hypotension (Table 2).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Altered baroreflex in α1A/C KO mice. HR data from PE infusions (Fig. 3) are plotted against PE dose (Upper) and MAP (Lower).

To test whether the altered baroreflex masked differences in pressor responses between KO and WT mice, the reflex was blocked by the muscarinic receptor antagonist atropine. As expected, atropine caused a small decrease in MAP and a larger increase in HR, but these effects of atropine were significant only in KO mice (Fig. 5). PE increased MAP robustly in KO and WT mice during baroreflex blockade (Fig. 5), and thus baroreflex resetting did not mask a difference in pressor responsiveness. Notably, PE did not change HR when the baroreflex was blocked (Fig. 5).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Blood pressure and HR with atropine and isoproterenol in α1A/C KO mice. The protocol was as in Fig. 3. Isoproterenol (3 μg/kg) was given after the response to PE had returned to baseline. Then atropine (1 mg/kg) was given to block the baroreflex. After 4 min, when parasympathetic blockade was complete and MAP and HR had stabilized, PE was again infused at a maximum dose (100 μg/kg). In these experiments, baseline HR was WT 551 ± 12 (n = 18), KO 587 ± 24 (n = 14), P = not significant. Baseline MAP was WT 128 ± 3, KO 115 ± 2, P = 0.006.

Effect of β-Adrenergic Stimulation with Isoproterenol.

To test for changes in β-AR signaling in KO mice, MAP and HR were measured after infusion of the β-AR agonist isoproterenol. Isoproterenol increased HR and decreased MAP significantly and similarly in KO and WT mice (Fig. 5). Thus, β-AR effects were not changed in the KO. The final HR after isoproterneol was significantly faster in the KO than the WT, and the final MAP was significantly lower, reflecting the different basal values of HR and MAP in the two genotypes (see legend to Fig. 5).

Vascular Structure in KO Mice.

The α1A/C was expressed in the vasculature early in development (Fig. 1D), so we measured arterial size, to test whether abnormal development explained the hypotension in KO mice. In three KO and three WT female mice aged 12 weeks, lumen areas (mm2) were the same in KO and WT in celiac (0.044 vs. 0.048), mesenteric (0.070 vs. 0.072), and renal (0.092 vs. 0.087) (all P = not significant), arteries with high levels of the α1A/C (Fig. 2). Areas were also identical in the carotid (0.095 vs. 0.106), an artery with no detectable α1A/C (Fig. 2).

HR Variability.

The significant effect of atropine in the KO but not in the WT was consistent with a relative increase in basal sympathetic activity in the KO. To test for a change in autonomic balance in the KO, we measured heart rate variability by ECG telemetry in conscious mice. As shown in the supporting information, the effects of autonomic drugs indicated that increased sympathetic activity caused decreased heart rate variability. Basal heart rate variability was decreased significantly in the KO vs. WT (14%, P < 0.05), suggesting heightened sympathetic balance in the KO (supporting information).

Discussion

The major finding in this study is that the α1A/C-AR subtype is required to maintain normal arterial blood pressure. Knockout of the α1A/C receptor caused reduced blood pressure at rest and following infusion of pressor catecholamines. In addition, several findings suggested that hypotension in KO mice was due to loss of vasoconstriction mediated by the α1A/C. These results establish the α1A/C-AR as a potent mediator of vasopressor responses and indicate that selective α1A/C antagonists might be efficacious in treating hypertension.

A role for the α1A/C in vasopressor responses was documented by localization of the receptor in resistance arteries and by infusion of an α1A/C-selective agonist A61603. α1A/C expression in gut and renal arteries was suspected from prior studies in other species (4). However, the LacZ reporter gene provided new insights. Unexpectedly, the α1A/C was absent in the thoracic aorta and its major branches. In the gut and renal arteries where the α1A/C was expressed, the pattern of expression was remarkably heterogeneous. These findings indicate caution in the choice of arterial rings for vascular studies in vitro. The mechanism for the heterogeneous expression pattern is unknown, but there might be a relation to the pattern of sympathetic fibers innervating the arteries (19). Also unexpected was α1A/C expression in skin arterioles. Study of skin vessels by classical AR localization techniques is difficult because of their small size, but the skin accounts for ≈9% of resting cardiac output, and thus contributes significantly to vascular resistance (16). Further, localization of the α1A/C in skin arteries indicates a potential role for this subtype in heat regulation, a common problem in diseases with abnormal sympathetic activity (16).

The skin, gut, and kidney together receive over 50% of resting cardiac output (16), and thus vasoconstriction in these beds is expected to have a major effect on blood pressure. Indeed, we showed that the α1A/C-selective agonist A61603 caused a substantial hypertensive effect in WT and Het mice, and no effect in KO mice. Thus, we conclude that α1A/C-AR is a potent vasopressor.

Interestingly, other α1-AR subtypes were also suggested to be vasopressors, in that the nonselective α1-AR agonist PE caused an increase in blood pressure in KO mice. However, the final blood pressure with PE in KO mice was only 85% of WT. Thus, the α1B and/or α1D were unable to compensate fully for the loss of the α1A/C, either at rest or with α1 agonist infusion. It is unclear whether α1B or α1D receptors mediate the residual α1-AR-mediated vasopressor response in the absence of α1A/C receptors. The α1B KO mouse has normal basal blood pressure but, similar to the α1A/C KO, demonstrates a reduced pressor response to PE (9). However, measurement in the α1B KO was made shortly after anesthesia (9), which can alter AR responses (14, 20), and further study is warranted.

Several findings suggested that hypotension in α1A/C KO mice was caused by reduced vascular tone. Blood pressure is a function of vascular resistance and cardiac output, and cardiac output is determined by heart and kidney function (21). The α1A/C gene was expressed in heart and kidney, albeit at very low levels in the heart, but size and function of these two organs were normal. In addition, arterial size was normal, and the pressor response to PE in the KO suggested that intrinsic vascular structure and function were normal. Taken together, the data support the conclusion that hypotension in KO mice was caused by loss of α1A/C-mediated vasoconstriction and consequent reduction of vasomotor tone.

Normal cardiovascular structure in α1A/C KO mice was noteworthy, given the results from rat models implicating the α1A/C receptor in cardiac hypertrophy (12). The α1A/C KO did not alter the normal increase in cardiac size with development, in agreement with an α1A/C transgenic model with unaltered heart size (22). Adult heart size is also normal in α1B KO mice (9). Therefore, single knockout of α1-AR subtypes does not alter normal growth of the heart during postnatal development. However, double knockout of the α1A/C and α1B receptors does cause a smaller adult heart (T. D. O'Connell, S. Ishizaka, P. M. Swigart, A. Nakamura, M. C. Rodrigo, S. Cotecchia, D.G.R., W. Grossman, E. Foster, and P.C.S., unpublished data).

Although heart and artery size were unchanged in the α1A/C KO, the change of the baroreflex was evidence for chronic hypotension. Baroreflex resetting is a known adaptation to chronic changes in blood pressure (21). A shift of the pressure-rate relation to the left, as found in this study, is characteristic of chronic hypotension (21). Resetting of the baroreflex could explain the blunted reflex tachycardia in response to hypotension in the α1A/C KO. Hypotension would also be expected to stimulate a reflex increase in sympathetic activity. Two findings suggested increased sympathetic activity in the KO, the significant response to parasympathetic blockade in the KO but not the WT, and the decreased heart rate variability in the KO.

Our results have potential clinical relevance. The degree of blood pressure reduction in α1A/C KO mice was similar to the effect of nonselective α1-AR antagonists in clinical hypertension (1, 2). It would be interesting to see whether selective α1A/C antagonists could reduce blood pressure without unwanted side effects such as orthostatic hypotension. Also, low levels of the α1A/C receptor in heart, as seen here and in other mouse studies (9), might be an advantage. This might lessen the chance that receptor blockade would cause heart failure, as was seen with nonselective α1-AR antagonism in the ALLHAT trial (2, 6, 7). The distribution of the α1A/C in mouse arteries found here is similar to that seen in man (4), suggesting that the mouse might be an appropriate model for blood pressure regulation. On the other hand, mouse and human might differ in α1A/C expression in heart (23), and it will be important to develop methods to test the effects of chronic blockade limited to α1A/C receptors.

Supplementary Material

Supporting Information

Acknowledgments

We thank Gregory L. Simpson for measurements of tail cuff blood pressure, blood chemistries, and organ weights; and Elyse Foster and Aki Nakamura for echocardiography. This work was supported by fellowships to D.G.R. from the American Heart Association, Western States Affiliate, and the Canadian Heart and Stroke Foundation; and by the Department of Veterans Affairs and the National Institutes of Health (P.C.S.).

Abbreviations

AR

adrenergic receptor

F

filial

Het

heterozygous knockout

HR

heart rate

KO

homozygous knockout

MAP

mean arterial pressure

PE

phenylephrine

WT

wild type

Footnotes

This paper was submitted directly (Track II) to the PNAS office.

Throughout this paper we use the name α1A/C-AR to indicate that the names “A” and “C” have both been given to the same cloned subtype (24). The cloned α1D-AR was named originally the α1A (24), and accession nos. in GenBank for the α1D sequence (M60654 and M60655) still refer to this gene as the α1A.

References

  • 1.Guthrie R M, Siegel R L. Clin Ther. 1999;21:1732–1748. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(99)80052-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.ALLHAT Collaborative Research Group. J Am Med Assoc. 2000;283:1967–1975. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Rokosh D G, Bailey B A, Stewart A F R, Karns L R, Long C S, Simpson P C. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1994;200:1177–1184. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1994.1575. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Michelotti G A, Price D T, Schwinn D A. Pharmacol Ther. 2000;88:281–309. doi: 10.1016/s0163-7258(00)00092-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Piascik M T, Soltis E E, Piascik M M, Macmillan L B. Pharmacol Ther. 1996;72:215–241. doi: 10.1016/s0163-7258(96)00117-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Beevers D G, Lip G Y. J Hum Hypertens. 2000;14:287–289. doi: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1001038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Lasagna L. J Am Med Assoc. 2000;283:2013–2014. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Rohrer D K, Kobilka B K. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 1998;38:351–373. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.38.1.351. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Cavalli A, Lattion A L, Hummler E, Nenniger M, Pedrazzini T, Aubert J F, Michel M C, Yang M, Lembo G, Vecchione C, et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1997;94:11589–11594. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.21.11589. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Piascik M T, Perez D M. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2001;298:403–410. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.O'Connell T D, Rokosh D G, Simpson P C. Mol Pharmacol. 2001;59:1225–1234. doi: 10.1124/mol.59.5.1225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Rokosh D G, Stewart A F R, Chang K C, Bailey B A, Karliner J S, Camacho S A, Long C S, Simpson P C. J Biol Chem. 1996;271:5839–5843. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.10.5839. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Krege J H, John S W, Langenbach L L, Hodgin J B, Hagaman J R, Bachman E S, Jennette J C, O'Brien D A, Smithies O. Nature (London) 1995;375:146–148. doi: 10.1038/375146a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Desai K H, Sato R, Schauble E, Barsh G S, Kobilka B K, Bernstein D. Am J Physiol. 1997;272:H1053–H1061. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.1997.272.2.H1053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Nakamura A, Rokosh D G, Paccanaro M, Yee R R, Simpson P C, Grossman W, Foster E. Am J Physiol. 2001;281:H1104–H1112. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.2001.281.3.H1104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Zelis R, Nellis S H, Longhurst J, Lee G, Mason D T. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 1975;18:181–199. doi: 10.1016/0033-0620(75)90010-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Lifton R P, Gharavi A G, Geller D S. Cell. 2001;104:545–556. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(01)00241-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Knepper S M, Buckner S A, Brune M E, DeBernardis J F, Meyer M D, Hancock A A. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1995;274:97–103. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Bevan J A, Bevan R D, Duckles S P. In: Handbook of Physiology. Bohr D F, Somlyo A P, Sparks H V Jr, editors. Vol. 2. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1980. pp. 515–566. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Rohrer D K, Schauble E H, Desai K H, Kobilka B K, Bernstein D. Am J Physiol. 1998;274:H1184–H1193. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.1998.274.4.H1184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Guyton A C, Hall J E. Textbook of Medical Physiology. 10th Ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2000. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Lin F, Owens W A, Chen S, Stevens M E, Kesteven S, Arthur J F, Woodcock E A, Feneley M P, Graham R M. Circ Res. 2001;89:343–350. doi: 10.1161/hh1601.095912. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Price D T, Lefkowitz R J, Caron M G, Berkowitz D, Schwinn D A. Mol Pharmacol. 1994;45:171–175. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Hieble J P, Bylund D B, Clarke D E, Eikenburg D C, Langer S Z, Lefkowitz R J, Minneman K P, Ruffolo R R., Jr Pharmacol Rev. 1995;47:267–270. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. McCloskey, D. T., Rokosh, D. G., O'Connell, T. D., Keung, E. C., Simpson, P. C. & Baker, A. J. (2002) J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol., in press. [DOI] [PubMed]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supporting Information

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES