Skip to main content
. 2025 Feb 15;53(4):1469–1481. doi: 10.1007/s15010-025-02474-3

Table 2.

Comparison of the characteristics of CAZ–AVI- and/or IMI–REL-resistant clinical isolates

Strains MLST Serotypes String test MIC (mg/L) range Cross resistance (n,%)a
CAZ–AVI IMI–REL AMP AZT LEV MIN CIP GM AMK TGC PB
ST11 KL47 KL64 KL10 4–8 16–32 64–128  ≤ 1  ≥ 4
Total (n = 22) 22 9 12 1 9 1 16 5 16 6

22,

100.0%

22,

100.0%

22,

100.0%

11,

50.0%

22,

100.0%

22,

100.0%

20,

91.0%

3,

13.7%

2,

9.1%

Only CAZ–AVI-resistant (n = 16) 16 6 9 1 7 0 12 4 16 0

16,

100.0%

16,

100.0%

16,

100.0%

9,

56.3%

16,

100.0%

16,

100.0%

16,

100.0%

3,

18.8%

1,

6.3%

CAZ–AVI- and IMI–REL-resistant (n = 5) 5 3 2 0 2 0 4 1 0 4

5,

100.0%

5,

100.0%

5,

100.0%

1,

20.0%

5,

100.0%

5,

100.0%

3,

60.0%

0,

0.0%

1,

20.0%

Only IMI–REL-resistant (n = 1) 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 2

1,

100.0%

1,

100.0%

1,

100.0%

1,

100%

1,

100.0%

1,

100.0%

1,

100.0%

0,

0.0%

0,

0.0%

The MIC results of tigecycline were determined according to the US Food and Drug Administration standard

aAMP ampicillin, AZT aztreonam, LEV levofloxacin, MIN minocycline, CIP ciprofloxacin, GM gentamycin, AMK amikacin, TGC tigecycline, PB polymyxin B