Skip to main content
Food Science & Nutrition logoLink to Food Science & Nutrition
. 2025 Aug 3;13(8):e70754. doi: 10.1002/fsn3.70754

Food Allergy Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Among Restaurant's Staff in Bangladesh: A Structural Modeling Approach

Nitai Roy 1,, Sultan Mahmud Imran 2, Sourav Chandra Debnath 2, Abdullah Al Adib 2, Samia Sultana 2, Sumana Mahmud 2, Rejwana Rashid 2, Ekhtear Hossain 3, Farhadul Islam 4, Kamal Krishna Biswas 4
PMCID: PMC12319151  PMID: 40761491

ABSTRACT

Food‐related allergic reactions are increasingly prevalent in restaurant settings, often leading to severe and life‐threatening incidents. This study aimed to investigate the relationships among knowledge, attitudes, and management practices related to food allergies in restaurant staff in Bangladesh. A cross‐sectional study conducted between January and May 2024 assessed food allergy knowledge, attitudes, and practices among 712 restaurant staff across eight divisional areas in Bangladesh, using structured face‐to‐face interviews. Descriptive and structural equation modeling (SEM) were applied to validate the hypothesized model and assess latent constructs. The proposed model met the criteria for goodness of fit indices, indicating an acceptable fit to the data. Overall, restaurant staff members demonstrated a relatively higher level of knowledge; however, a significant amount of uncertainty was observed in their attitudes. Despite implementing effective measures to prevent cross‐contamination and safeguard against allergies, their management practices regarding customer communication and remaking meals following mistakes were insufficient for ensuring customer safety. Notably, knowledge had no significant impact on management practices, whereas attitudes toward food allergies had a strong and positive influence on how practices were implemented. There was also a positive association between knowledge and attitude, suggesting that a decline in knowledge is likely to correspond with a decrease in attitude scores. Two of our hypotheses (H2 and H3) were supported by the findings of this study. In conclusion, while restaurant staff exhibited a solid foundational knowledge and implemented effective practices to manage food allergies, gaps in attitudes and certain management practices highlight the need for enhanced training to ensure comprehensive allergy safety for all customers.

Keywords: attitudes, food allergy, knowledge, practices, restaurant staff, structural equation modeling


Restaurant staff in Bangladesh had good foundational knowledge of food allergies, but attitudes showed notable uncertainty. Attitudes, but not knowledge, significantly influenced food allergy management practices, especially customer communication and corrective actions. The study supports enhancing staff training focused on attitude improvement to ensure comprehensive food allergy safety in restaurants.

graphic file with name FSN3-13-e70754-g003.jpg

1. Introduction

Food allergy represents a serious and growing health concern, where even minimal exposure can trigger severe reactions. This underscores the importance of comprehensive knowledge, mindful attitudes, and safe practices to ensure a safe and enjoyable dining experience for all. Food allergies impact about 1%–10% of the global population, increasingly affecting infants, children, and adults worldwide (Gupta et al. 2023; Warren et al. 2020). In recent years, there has been a notable rise in the prevalence of food allergies within developing nations, a trend that contrasts sharply with earlier research (Leung et al. 2018).

Food allergy is an immune reaction to proteins found in food, which can be categorized as either immunoglobulin (Ig)E‐mediated or non–(Ig)E‐mediated. This condition often presents a diverse array of symptoms impacting the skin, gastrointestinal tract, and respiratory tract, with manifestations that can vary from mild irritations to severe, life‐threatening reactions (Lopez 2023; Moore et al. 2017). The landscape of food allergies is complex, with more than 160 foods identified as potential triggers for allergic reactions. However, the Food Allergen Labeling and Consumer Protection Act (FALCPA) brings attention to eight prevalent allergens: eggs, milk, fish (including bass and cod), shellfish (such as crab and shrimp), peanuts, wheat, tree nuts (like almonds and walnuts), and soybeans. These account for 90% of all food allergy reactions within the general population, underscoring their significance in food safety and consumer protection (FALCPA 2004; USDA 2024).

In Bangladesh, the food industry adheres to the Packaged Food Labelling Act of 2017, which mandates that packaged or processed food labels clearly indicate any ingredients that may trigger allergic or intolerant reactions. This regulation identifies 12 allergenic foods: gluten‐containing foods (such as barley, rye, wheat, and wheat grain), eggs, milk (including lactose), mustard, soybeans, peanuts, fish, sesame seeds, celery, pine nuts (such as almonds, hazelnuts, and walnuts), crustacean shellfish, and food products containing sulfites (10 mg per kg or more). Ensuring these allergens are included on the product label is crucial for consumer safety (Bangladesh Food Safety Authority 2017).

A study in Bangladesh found that brinjal, beef, and hilsa fish are among the most common foods causing allergic reactions (Ali et al. 2020). Since food allergies are incurable, prevention and management rely on avoiding known food allergens (FDA 2024). However, avoiding allergen‐containing foods can be difficult, especially in Bangladesh, where many people eat out or in restaurants, which is a growing concern (Ahmed 2023). Restaurants are a major site of allergic reactions, with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reporting that one in three people with food allergies experience a reaction while dining out (CDC 2024). Miscommunication and lack of knowledge among restaurant staff frequently contribute to accidental exposures (Carter et al. 2020). A systematic review indicates that 21%–31% of allergic reactions occur in restaurants, often due to cross‐contamination during food preparation (Versluis et al. 2015). Improving restaurant practices and increasing staff knowledge about food allergies can help lower the risk of allergic reactions in restaurant settings (CDC 2024). However, studies reveal that restaurant workers often lack adequate knowledge to safely prepare meals for allergic customers (Ahuja and Sicherer 2007). Several studies have examined the knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) of restaurant staff, focusing on their training and management of food allergens, highlighting the positive impact of training programs (Dupuis et al. 2016; Elsahoryi et al. 2021; Lee and Sozen 2016; Radke et al. 2016). Trained staff are better able to comprehend food allergies and effectively communicate with customers about potential concerns, contributing to a safer dining environment (Bailey et al. 2014; CDC 2024; Lee and Sozen 2016). Having good knowledge of food allergens, along with the correct attitude and proper practices by restaurant staff, can help reduce allergic reactions among individuals with food allergies.

While food safety KAP studies have been conducted in Bangladesh (Hashanuzzaman et al. 2020; Islam et al. 2022; Jubayer et al. 2020), there is a lack of research specifically addressing food allergy KAP among restaurant staff. To our knowledge, no studies have addressed this issue in Bangladesh. Additionally, the application of structural equation modeling (SEM) in food allergen research is limited (Soon 2018b, 2019), with only one study utilizing SEM to analyze food allergy KAP among restaurant workers (Agwa 2023). Although SEM has been applied in food safety KAP studies in Bangladesh (Hasan et al. 2022; Sarma et al. 2022), its use in food allergy research is unexplored. To address these gaps, this study examines the knowledge of food allergies, attitudes toward food allergens, and food allergy management practices among restaurant staff members in Bangladesh using the SEM method. In this study, the author introduces the following hypotheses, as suggested by several studies (Baser et al. 2017; Lim et al. 2016; Soon 2018b, 2019). The hypotheses are presented below:

Knowledge of food allergies does not have a direct impact on food allergy management practices.

Attitude toward food allergies have a direct impact on food allergy management practices.

There is a correlation between knowledge and attitudes regarding food allergies.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Purpose and Model

In the context of restaurant management, it is essential to emphasize the KAP related to food allergies. The primary causes of allergic reactions in commercial restaurants include cross‐contamination, hidden food allergies, and insufficient awareness among restaurant workers (Lee and Sozen 2016). The objective of this study was to evaluate the KAP of restaurant workers in Bangladesh with respect to food allergies and to investigate the interrelations between these factors through SEM. The objective of this research was to identify gaps in the management of food allergies, emphasize the potential for cross‐contamination, and offer suggestions for enhancing the safety protocols of restaurants. SEM is particularly well‐suited for this study because it enables the simultaneous analysis of numerous interrelated dependent and independent variables, thereby facilitating a comprehensive comprehension of the dynamic interactions between KAP factors. The conceptual model depicted in Figure 1 serves as the basis for analysis in this study.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Model development of food allergen knowledge, attitude, and practices.

2.2. Sampling and Data Collection

A cross‐sectional study was conducted from January 2024 to May 2024 to evaluate the KAP of staff at restaurants in Bangladesh with respect to food allergies. The study included all eight divisional areas: Dhaka, Rangpur, Rajshahi, Barisal, Khulna, Sylhet, Mymensingh, and Chittagong. Potential respondents were provided with an information sheet that explained the study's objectives, significance, and procedures before their participation. All participants were granted informed consent before participating in the survey. Face‐to‐face interviews were conducted by a team of trained interviewers, who employed a structured questionnaire to collect data. This approach was selected to enable a thorough comprehension of the participants' practical experiences in addressing food allergies in a restaurant setting, as well as their attitudes and knowledge regarding food allergies. Initially, the interviewers contacted 750 restaurant staff members in the designated divisional areas. Of these, 712 individuals voluntarily consented to participate in the study. Nevertheless, the data cleaning procedure excluded incomplete responses, resulting in a final sample size of 702 participants for the subsequent data analysis. A diverse representation of roles within the restaurant industry was achieved by the demographic composition of the restaurant personnel, which included chefs, assistant chefs, waiters, cleaners, and managers.

2.3. Instrumentation

A structured questionnaire was meticulously constructed for the purpose of data collection. To ensure that the questionnaire was accessible to participants, three bilingual researchers who were proficient in both English and Bengali translated the pre‐study questionnaire from English to Bengali, the native language of the target population. A back‐translation process was implemented to guarantee the translation's accuracy and integrity. A pilot study involving 30 participants was carried out to assess the clarity, cultural appropriateness, and internal consistency of the Bengali‐translated questionnaire. Based on feedback, minor revisions were made to improve item clarity. The internal consistency of each KAP construct was measured using Cronbach's alpha from the pilot data with values of 0.798, 0.849, and 0.727, demonstrating acceptable to good reliability. This necessitated the translation of the Bengali version into English by independent researchers who were not aware of the original questionnaire. It takes approximately 15 min to complete the questionnaire. The questionnaire was divided into four sections consisting of socio‐demographic and health‐related factors, food safety knowledge, attitudes, and practices. Section I was used to collect data on participants' gender, age, religion, marital status, residence area, education level, professional role, and job experience. It also collected data on general job satisfaction, personal history of food allergies, family history of food sensitivities, participation in food allergy training, and interest in learning more about food allergies. Section II on food safety knowledge included 10 questions that tested the participants' knowledge about food allergies. Participants were given three options for each question (“yes,” “no,” and “do not know”) to avoid selecting the correct answer by chance. Each correct answer received 1 point, while incorrect or “do not know” responses received 0 points. Sections III and IV were created to assess the participants' attitudes and practices about food allergies. This component comprised 10 questions evaluated using a 5‐point Likert scale, ranging from 1 (strongly disagree/never) to 5 (strongly agree/always). Reverse coding was applied for negative statements to ensure consistency in the data.

2.4. Ethics Statement

The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Ethical Committee of the Patuakhali Science and Technology University (approval no. PSTU/IEC/2023/65 (4)). Before each interview, participants were fully informed about the objectives, procedures, potential risks, and benefits of the study. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants before data collection commenced. To maintain the integrity of the study, strict measures were implemented to guarantee confidentiality and anonymity of all data collected throughout the study.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

The Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) version 27 was used to conduct descriptive analysis, normality assessments, reliability analysis, Pearson's correlation analysis, and exploratory factor analysis (EFA). Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was performed using Analysis of Moment Structures (AMOS) version 23.0. A 95% confidence level was used throughout the analysis.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Descriptive Statistics

This survey included 702 restaurant workers, with the majority being male (93.9%). The majority of workers fell into the 21–30 and 31–40 age categories, which is consistent with findings from prior surveys on restaurant workers in Bangladesh, where the majority of staff are males aged 20–40 (Hasan et al. 2022). Male staff members make the majority of food preparation decisions, reflecting the overall trend of male domination in the restaurant profession (Dhaka Tribune 2022). More than half of the participants had received primary or secondary education, with only 6.7% having graduated, underlining restaurant workers' low educational attainment. A major 96.2% of workers indicated no prior training on food allergies. Almost 90% of the participants had more than 1 year of experience working in restaurants. Job satisfaction was indicated by 59.4% of workers, with 64.5% having a personal history of food allergies. Waiters (38%), followed by chefs (16.5%), assistant chefs (16.1%), and managers (18.2%), were the most common professional roles among participants. All participants identified as religious, with Muslims accounting for the vast majority (88.9%) (Table 1).

TABLE 1.

Sample characteristics (n = 702).

Variables Category Frequency Percentage %
Gender Female 43 6.1%
Male 659 93.9%
Age category (mean age: 33.17 ± 9.35) ≤ 20 31 4.4%
21–30 294 41.9%
31–40 224 31.9%
41–50 125 17.8%
> 50 28 4.0%
Religion Muslim 624 88.9%
Hindu 78 11.1%
Marital status Unmarried 209 29.8%
Married 476 67.8%
Widowed/divorced 17 2.4%
Residence area Urban 545 77.6%
Rural 157 22.4%
Education qualification No formal education 115 16.4%
Primary 177 25.2%
Secondary 215 30.6%
Higher secondary 148 21.1%
Hons and above a 47 6.7%
Professional role Chef 116 16.5%
Chef assistant 113 16.1%
Waiter 267 38.0%
Cleaner 78 11.1%
Manager 128 18.2%
Working experience Less than 1 year 71 10.1%
1–3 years 213 30.3%
3–5 years 182 25.9%
More than 5 years 236 33.6%
Overall job satisfaction Very dissatisfied 8 1.1%
Dissatisfied 69 9.8%
Satisfied 417 59.4%
Very satisfied 208 29.6%
History of food allergy No 169 24.1%
Yes 453 64.5%
Don't know 80 11.4%
Family history of food allergies No 93 13.2%
Yes 546 77.8%
Don't know 63 9.0%
Participation in any training on food allergies No 675 96.2%
Yes 27 3.8%
Desired to get further information on food allergens No 130 18.5%
Yes 572 81.5%
a

Honors degree and above.

3.2. Construct Reliability and Validity

EFA was applied to extract the valid items from food allergy KAP. Items exhibiting a factor loading exceeding 0.40 were deemed acceptable (Baser et al. 2017; Soon 2019). Thus, a total of 2 items were deleted from food allergy management practice. The Kaiser‐Meyer‐Olkin (KMO) measure of sampling value for food allergy KAP was 0.807, 0.927, and 0.868, respectively. These values fulfill the criteria of validity (> 0.60) (Hair Jr. et al. 1988). The reliability of all extracted items was assessed using Cronbach's alpha coefficients, which exceeded the threshold of 0.70. This result indicates an acceptable level of internal consistency among the items (Hair 2010).

To ensure that the extracted items aligned appropriately with the empirical data, a CFA was performed together with an EFA. This additional test sought to enhance the construct validity of the latent factors. In relation to convergent validity, the confirmation of latent factors was achieved through the evaluation of factor loadings (> 0.40) and composite reliability (CR) (> 0.70) as indicated by Soon (2019) and Hair (2010). The factor loadings for food safety KAP items, as presented in Tables 3, 4, 5, varied between 0.41 and 0.85, with CR values surpassing 0.70. Increased factor loadings suggest a stronger correspondence of items with the model. In addition, to establish convergent validity, the average variance extracted (AVE) must exceed the minimal threshold of 0.5. However, Fornell and Larcker (1981) argue that convergent validity is still satisfactory if CR exceeds 0.6, even if AVE is less than 0.5. In our analysis, the KAP components have corresponding AVE values of 0.328, 0.522, and 0.427. Although knowledge and practice's AVE was below the 0.5 cutoff, all components' CR scores were over 0.6, suggesting adequate convergent validity. These results validate the measurement model's internal validity. As a result, we kept the knowledge and practice constructs since their reliability was adequate to ensure convergent validity. Additionally, the measurement items were adapted from established, validated instruments and reviewed for their suitability within the context of food allergies.

TABLE 3.

Frequencies, item loadings, and validities for reliability test and convergent validity of items in knowledge toward food allergy (n = 702).

Items Questions (Cronbach's α = 0.848) Frequency (%) a Standard loadings Composite reliability Average variance extracted
K1 Food allergies can develop from small amounts of food 616 (87.7) 0.59 0.827 0.328
K2 For children, cow milk is a common allergen 586 (83.5) 0.52
K3 Allergic responses may occur within a few hours following the consumption of food 619 (88.2) 0.71
K4 Food allergies are similar with food intolerance b 640 (91.2) 0.64
K5 Cross‐contact occurs when proteins from one food mix with another 626 (89.2) 0.67
K6 Taking out an allergen from a finished meal, like nuts, might be all that's needed to make it safe for a customer with a food allergy b 624 (88.9) 0.56
K7 Food allergies can be eliminated by heating, baking, or deep‐frying meals at high temperatures b 532 (75.8) 0.53
K8 Separate equipment should be used for products containing allergens. 565 (80.5) 0.58
K9 Allergic reactions to food might cause difficulty breathing 537 (76.5) 0.45
K10 The most effective medication for managing a severe food allergy reaction is epinephrine 619 (88.2) 0.41
a

Indicates correct response frequency and percentage.

b

Indicates questions are reverse‐coded. These items were reverse‐coded during analysis to ensure consistent scoring direction, where higher scores indicate greater knowledge accuracy.

TABLE 4.

Mean scores, item loadings, and validities for reliability test and convergent validity of items in attitude toward food allergy (1: strongly disagree to 5: strongly agree) (n = 702).

Items Questions (Cronbach's α = 0.911) Mean ± SD a Standard loadings Composite reliability Average variance extracted
A1 Managing food allergies is a crucial aspect of my responsibilities 3.72 ± 0.94 0.73 0.915 0.522
A2 I don't think food allergies are a significant problem for the restaurant business b 3.71 ± 0.78 0.66
A3 I am interested in attending food allergy training courses/workshops to gain a deeper understanding of food allergies 3.41 ± 1.09 0.59
A4 I trust that providing correct allergen information to customers will reduce food allergy reactions 3.77 ± 0.83 0.78
A5 Having a thorough knowledge of allergies to certain foods will prove beneficial in the work environment 3.88 ± 0.75 0.85
A6 I will modify recipes or suggest alternatives for customers with food allergies 4.07 ± 0.73 0.69
A7 I don't believe I can effectively handle a food allergy emergency at work b 3.76 ± 0.85 0.83
A8 Food labels should indicate the presence of allergens 3.93 ± 0.78 0.57
A9 Customers with food allergies should be given options based on their requirements 4.01 ± 0.71 0.68
A10 Staff should be capable of figuring out menu ingredients when asked by a customer 3.89 ± 0.76 0.79
a

Mean value was calculated by sum of total responses in each question divided by the total number of respondents.

b

Indicates questions are reverse‐coded.

TABLE 5.

Mean scores, item loadings, and validities for reliability test and convergent validity of items in food allergy management practices (1: never to 5: always) (n = 702).

Items Questions (Cronbach's α = 0.837) Mean ± SD a Standard loadings Composite reliability Average variance extracted
P1 I wash my hands and change gloves before making allergen‐free meals 4.44 ± 0.10 0.51 0.854 0.427
P2 I wear clean uniforms while preparing food 4.25 ± 1.17 0.59
P3 I use the same tools for handling both allergenic and non‐allergenic foods b 3.13 ± 1.65 0.51
P4 I take extra precautions when preparing the eight most prevalent food allergens 2.87 ± 1.36 0.76
P5 I verify ingredients and read contents before using packaged foods 2.83 ± 1.31 0.79
P6 If a customer has a food allergy, I double‐check to ensure the dish is allergen‐free 2.90 ± 1.30 0.67
P7 I keep foods that contain allergens and foods devoid of allergens in the same places b 3.44 ± 1.25 < 0.40
P8 If something goes wrong, I remake the food when serving a customer with a food allergy 2.83 ± 1.34 0.66
P9 Before cooking, I ensure utensils are clean and sanitized to prevent cross‐contact 4.13 ± 0.96 < 0.40
P10 I make an effort to attentively respond to customer inquiries about food allergies 4.21 ± 0.87 0.68
a

Mean value was conducted by the sum of total response in each question divided by the total number of respondents.

b

Indicates questions are reverse‐coded.

3.3. Discriminant Validity

Table 2 shows the Fornell‐Larcker criterion, with the square root of the AVE represented along the diagonal. To ascertain discriminant validity, the diagonal values must exceed the off‐diagonal correlation values for each construct. The findings demonstrate that the square roots of the AVE for knowledge (0.573), attitude (0.722), and practice (0.653) exceed their respective inter‐construct correlations, hence affirming discriminant validity (Fornell and Larcker 1981).

TABLE 2.

The Fornell‐Larcker criterion.

Variables Knowledge Attitude Practice
Knowledge 0.573
Attitude 0.171 a 0.722
Practice 0.135 a 0.606 a 0.653

Note: Diagonals represent the square root of the AVE.

a

Pearsons's correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2‐tailed).

3.4. Descriptive Statistics of Measurement Items

The findings in Table 3 indicate that 87.7% of respondents acknowledged that even a small amount of allergenic food could trigger an allergic reaction. This aligns with earlier research indicating that restaurant and food service staff possess a significant awareness of the risks associated with food allergens (Lee and Xu 2015; Lessa et al. 2016; Loerbroks et al. 2019; McAdams et al. 2018; Radke et al. 2016; Soon 2019; Wham and Sharma 2014). However, other studies have reported a lower level of such knowledge among staff (Eren et al. 2021; Sogut et al. 2015; Soon 2018b). The higher percentage indicates a robust understanding among staff regarding the seriousness of food allergies and the dangers associated with even minimal allergen exposure. The observed discrepancies could potentially indicate variations in training methodologies, regional policy implementations, or educational resource availability. In our study, the majority of staff (91.2%) believe that food allergies and food intolerances are separate. This contrasts with Bujaka and Riekstina‐Dolge (2019), who found that many restaurant employees feel that food allergies and food intolerances are the same thing or are unaware of their differences. Furthermore, 75.8% of restaurant staff were aware that food allergies cannot be eliminated by heating, roasting, or deep‐frying at high temperatures, consistent with similar studies (Lee and Xu 2015; Loerbroks et al. 2019; McAdams et al. 2018; Soon 2019; Wham and Sharma 2014). In contrast, Eren et al. (2021) found that 43.8% of participants were unaware of this fact, indicating a knowledge gap regarding the fact that cooking methods do not eliminate food allergies. A large majority of respondents (88.9%) agreed that simply removing allergens, such as nuts, from a finished meal does not guarantee the safety of customers with food allergies. This high level of awareness is consistent with prior research, which has highlighted the significance of comprehensive allergy management strategies (Loerbroks et al. 2019; McAdams et al. 2018; Radke et al. 2016). In contrast, Nasseredine et al. (2021) and Lee and Xu (2015) found over 40% of participants expressing ambiguity or lack of awareness of the safety consequences of allergen elimination alone. Finally, 88.2% of staff members identified epinephrine as the most effective drug for treating severe allergic responses, consistent with research conducted among Canadian restaurant staff (McAdams et al. 2018). However, Lee and Xu (2015) observed that only 60% of participants answered this correctly, showing a lower level of knowledge than our results. This discrepancy may be influenced by differences in national food safety training policies, cultural emphasis on allergy awareness, or the frequency and quality of training programs available to staff. The majority of our participants demonstrated extensive knowledge of food allergies; the opposing findings from research in Poland and Turkey highlight the important need for improved education and training for restaurants. Implementing systematic educational interventions may greatly improve knowledge and preparedness, thereby protecting individuals with food allergies (Wojtyniak et al. 2013; Sogut et al. 2015).

The findings presented in Table 4 indicate a predominantly positive attitude among staff regarding food allergy management. The high mean scores suggest a strong acknowledgment of their responsibilities (A1, 3.72), the importance of allergen knowledge (A5, 3.88), a proactive approach in adapting recipes (A6, 4.07), and providing allergen‐safe alternatives (A9, 4.01). These results align with studies in Canada, staff supported customize dishes to accommodate customers' food allergy requests (McAdams et al. 2018; Radke et al. 2016). However, the reduced score for interest in training (A3, 3.41) and the concerns regarding emergency handling (A7, 3.76) reveal gaps in both confidence and preparedness. McAdams et al. (2018) observed that restaurant employees strongly agreed that the food allergy training and education should be mandatory for all food service staff. McAdams et al. also found uncertainty among restaurant staff regarding their ability to handle food allergy emergencies at work, aligning with the findings of our study. Staff members in our study may not fully understand the importance of food allergy training, as most of our participants had never received training on food allergies. The moderate score for A2 (3.71) indicates a potential underestimation among some staff regarding the importance of food allergies within the restaurant industry. Implementing targeted training and establishing clearer allergen policies may significantly enhance staff competence, thereby contributing to improved overall food safety practices.

Table 5 highlights the differences in food allergy management practices among participants. There is strong adherence to fundamental hygiene practices, including handwashing (P1, 4.44) and maintaining uniform cleanliness (P2, 4.25). Many studies have also reported similar findings to ours, suggesting that the majority of food handlers thoroughly wash their hands with soap and water and wear a fresh pair of gloves before preparing allergen‐free meals (Eren et al. 2021; Jianu and Goleţ 2019; Soon 2018a). This finding is important because proper handwashing and the use of new gloves play a crucial role in preventing cross‐contamination, particularly in the preparation of allergen‐free meals. We also found that restaurant staff cleaned and sanitized utensils to prevent cross‐contamination before preparing meals, which aligns with findings from other similar studies on this topic (Eren et al. 2021; Jianu and Goleţ 2019; Soon 2018a). In contrast, there is a marked lower adherence to essential precautions, such as verifying ingredients (P5: 2.83 ± 1.31) and remaking food when required (P8, 2.83). This contrasts with other studies that report positive actions taken in such scenarios (Eren et al. 2021; Soon 2018a). High‐pressure environments, especially during busy hours, might discourage staff from taking the time to remake meals, leading them to prioritize speed over safety. Practices that exhibit lower mean scores, such as double‐checking dishes (P6: 2.90 ± 1.30), underscore potential risk areas for allergic reactions. Shafie and Azman (2015) found that 48.7% of food handlers did not double‐check whether the food was safe from allergens when the meal was ready, which supports similar practices observed among restaurant staff in our study. Food handlers might not fully understand the processes for verifying that food is free from allergens, resulting in inconsistent practices, underscoring the need for targeted training and reinforced protocols for food safety.

3.5. Structural Model

The evaluation of the structural model in SEM was conducted using fit indices and variance‐explained estimates, as presented in Table 6. The χ 2/df ratio of 2.892 fell below the threshold of 3, while the RMSEA value of 0.052 remained within the acceptable range of less than 0.08, suggesting a favorable fit (Kline 2015; Hu and Bentler 1999; Browon and Cudeck 1993). The incremental fit indices—CFI (0.941), NFI (0.912), and TLI (0.930)—all surpassed the threshold of 0.90, thereby reinforcing the adequacy of the model (Hu and Bentler 1999; Kline 2015). The GFI value of 0.912 satisfied the criterion of being greater than 0.90, whereas the AGFI value of 0.889 fell just short but remains acceptable considering the complexity of the model (Hu and Bentler 1999; Kline 2015). Residual‐based measures, SRMR (0.075) and RMR (0.038), fell below the threshold of 0.08, suggesting that discrepancies are minimal (Hu and Bentler 1999). The parsimony indices, PCFI (0.799) and PNFI (0.775), surpassed the > 0.50 threshold, indicating a balance between fit and simplicity (Mulaik et al. 1989; Kline 2015).

TABLE 6.

Goodness of fit indices for structural equation modeling of food allergy knowledge, attitude, and practice.

Fit indices Model value Accepted value References
Absolute fit measures
χ 2 928.350
df 321
χ 2/df 2.892 < 3 Kline (2015) and Schumacker and Lomax (2016)
Goodness of fit index (GFI) 0.912 > 0.90 Hu and Bentler (1999)
Adjusted Goodness of fit index (AGFI) 0.889 > 0.90 Kline (2015) and Hu and Bentler 1999
Root Mean square error of approximation (RMESA) 0.052 < 0.08 Hu and Bentler (1999) and Browon and Cudeck (1993)
Root Mean square residual (RMR) 0.038 < 0.08 Hu and Bentler (1999)
Standardized root mean squared residual (SRMR) 0.075 < 0.08 Hu and Bentler (1999)
Incremental fit measures
Comparative fit index (CFI) 0.941 > 0.90 Hu and Bentler (1999) and Kline (2015)
Normed fit index (NFI) 0.912 > 0.90 Hu and Bentler (1999) and Kline (2015)
Tucker‐Lewis index (TLI) 0.930 > 0.90 Hu and Bentler (1999) and Kline (2015)
Parsimony fit measures
Parsimony comparative fit index (PCFI) 0.799 > 0.50 Mulaik et al. (1989) and Kline (2015)
Parsimony normed fit index (PNFI) 0.775 > 0.50 Mulaik et al. (1989) and Kline (2015)

The findings demonstrated in Table 7 and Figure 2 highlight the standardized path coefficients, which indicate both the strength and direction of the direct relationships among the constructs. The initial hypothesis posited that knowledge of food allergies does not exert a direct influence on the practices related to food allergy management (H1). The results reveal a path coefficient of −0.012 for the relationship between knowledge and practice, accompanied by a critical ratio of −0.339 and a p‐value of 0.735. This suggests that the relationship does not reach statistical significance. The small negative coefficient indicates a minimal inverse relationship, supporting the hypothesis that knowledge alone may not directly influence management practices. Similar findings from earlier studies (Baser et al. 2017; Soon 2018b, 2019; Agwa 2023) corroborate our findings, showing that improved management practices are not always correlated with employees' knowledge of food allergies. However, according to a Costa Rican study, better management practices are associated with a higher level of knowledge of food allergies (López‐Calvo et al. 2022). Lee and Xu (2015) indicated that while training positively influenced knowledge, this knowledge alone proved inadequate for altering food safety practices. Research conducted on trained food handlers alongside studies of inadequately trained food handlers (Garayoa et al. 2011) indicates a disconnection between knowledge and the implementation of effective practices. The discrepancy between theoretical comprehension and practical application is a substantial barrier to the practical application of knowledge. For example, Saleh‐Langenberg et al. (2017) discovered that patients' knowledge of the proper use of epinephrine auto‐injectors did not always translate to their correct application in emergency situations (Saleh‐Langenberg et al. 2017). Furthermore, the training that restaurant personnel receive frequently is insufficient in terms of its practical application and profundity. Tan et al. (2023) demonstrated that restaurant managers and servers possessed varying degrees of food allergy knowledge, but there were significant variations in their perceived training requirements and food safety practices. In addition, the environment in which restaurant staff operate can either facilitate or impede the implementation of secure food handling practices (Ajala et al. 2010). For instance, employees may experience undue pressure to disregard appropriate allergen management practices, regardless of their level of expertise, if a restaurant prioritizes efficiency and speed over safety (Peiris et al. 2015). Therefore, for the conversion of knowledge into effective food allergy management practices, a multifaceted approach that integrates education, hands‐on training, and a supportive work environment is needed.

TABLE 7.

Estimates of hypothesis paths for food allergy knowledge, attitude, and practice.

Hypothesis Paths Estimates C.R. p
H1 Knowledge → Practice −0.012 −0.339 0.735
H2 Attitude → Practice 0.733 14.018 0.000
H3 Knowledge ↔ Attitude 0.136 2.889 0.004

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

Structural equation modeling of food allergy knowledge, attitude, and practices among restaurant's staff in Bangladesh.

The results indicate a positive and significant relationship between staff members' attitudes toward food allergies and their management practices (β = 0.733, p < 0.05), supporting Hypothesis 2 (H2). Figure 2 suggests that with each unit increase in staff members' attitudes, good management practices improve by 0.733 units. A positive attitude among restaurant staff demonstrates their dedication and motivation to manage food allergies effectively, ensuring customer protection from potential allergic reactions. Our findings on this issue are consistent with those of other studies conducted on similar topics (Baser et al. 2017; Soon 2018b; López‐Calvo et al. 2022). López‐Calvo et al. also reported that improved attitudes toward food allergens are linked to improved management practices, which aligns with our findings (López‐Calvo et al. 2022). Staff members who maintain positive attitudes are generally more aware of the risks related to food allergens, resulting in more careful and attentive management practices. In contrast, knowledge alone showed no significant effect (β = −0.012), possibly because theoretical understanding does not automatically translate to practical understanding in busy restaurant environments where time constraint, workflow pressures, and limited managerial support may override knowledge. However, a similar study conducted on UK consumers presents a contrasting perspective, revealing that high scores on attitude items did not consistently result in effective management practices, and there was no significant correlation between attitudes and management practices regarding food allergens (Soon 2019). This discrepancy may be the result of differences in the operational contexts of restaurants, as well as varying levels of awareness and education among staff and consumers. A large percentage of participants in our study disclosed that they had a personal history of food allergies. This likely increased their awareness of the severity of allergic reactions and contributed to their positive attitudes toward managing food allergies. These results emphasize that although knowledge is necessary, it is insufficient alone; effective food allergy management requires cultivating positive staff attitudes through empathy‐focused training and addressing operational challenges that obstruct the application of safety protocols.

Our study found a positive and significant correlation between food allergy knowledge and attitude (β = 0.136, p < 0.05), supporting Hypothesis (H3). This indicates that knowledge and attitude together have a dependent influence on practices. An increase in staff members' knowledge about food allergies will likely lead to an improvement in their attitudes toward managing food allergies effectively. Our results are consistent with the conclusions of previous studies that were conducted in comparable contexts (Agwa 2023; Baser et al. 2017; López‐Calvo et al. 2022; Soon 2019). The findings underscore the importance of enhancing knowledge among food service staff, which appears to result in more responsible and careful management of food allergens, thereby promoting safer dining experiences for individuals with allergies. However, another study found an insignificant relationship between food allergen knowledge and attitude among Malaysian consumers (Soon 2018b). The differences in findings may come from variations in cultural perspectives, levels of awareness, or the effectiveness of educational outreach related to food allergies. Furthermore, the observed discrepancies between our study and Soon's findings in Malaysia may be attributed to methodological differences, particularly in the nature and phrasing of the knowledge and attitude assessment questions.

3.6. Practical Implications of the Study

According to the findings, practical implications for improving food allergy management in restaurants include implementing integrated training programs that not only improve knowledge but also focus on building good staff attitudes, as these attitudes serve as a vital link to better practices. Specifically, training modules should include allergen identification, cross‐contact prevention, effective customer communication, and emergency response protocols. These should be delivered through mandatory annual workshops, supported by periodic refresher sessions. Successful initiatives such as Canada's Food Allergy Canada training program can serve as a model for developing context‐specific training in Bangladesh (Food Allergy Canada 2023). Hands‐on training, refresher courses, and visual aids are critical for closing knowledge gaps and improving emergency readiness. To reduce cross‐contact risks, structural improvements such as specialized allergen‐free preparation facilities and effective ingredient verification methods are required, along with explicit rules for reconstructing meals as necessary. Transparent menu labeling and open communication with customers are essential for safeguarding those with food allergies. Additionally, collaboration with the Bangladesh Food Safety Authority is recommended to standardize allergen management protocols across the restaurant industry, ensuring nationwide compliance and accountability. Leadership must aggressively foster a culture of responsibility and accountability by ensuring that employees prioritize safety over speed, particularly during peak hours. Continuous monitoring, including audits, feedback mechanisms, and coordination with health authorities, will ensure that best practices are followed and encourage continuous development. These steps not only make dining areas safer, but they also increase consumer trust and confidence, which improves the restaurant's reputation and customer happiness.

3.7. Limitations

The current study had a few limitations. For example, using convenient sampling procedures for selecting respondents reduces the generalizability of the results. The recruitment of restaurant employees who have voluntarily decided to participate may cause selection bias. Individuals with a stronger interest or understanding of food allergies may have been more likely to participate, skewing the data toward more positive KAP outcomes. The vast majority of participants stated that they had no prior food allergy training. This lack of training may reflect a larger industry gap, but it may also limit the depth of practical ideas given by respondents. Because participants had limited exposure to formal training, it is challenging to evaluate the potential impact of such training on food allergy KAP. Future research should address this gap by including participants with a broader range of training experiences. The sample is highly skewed toward male participants, with some female participants. This gender gap may restrict the findings' generalizability since male and female restaurant employees may have differing roles, responsibilities, and levels of exposure to food safety training, all of which could influence their KAP about food allergies. Future research should aim for more balanced gender representation to better reflect the perspectives and practices of all employees. Given the face‐to‐face data collection, social desirability bias may have caused participants to overstate their KAP related to food allergies. This could lead to inflated knowledge levels or a more favorable attitude and practices than are actually present in the broader restaurant workforce, affecting the accuracy of the findings and should be considered while interpreting the results. The cross‐sectional nature of the sample prevents the establishment of cause‐effect relationships. The KAP model employed in this study was not validated using independent datasets. Although the observational study may serve as indirect validation, the lack of direct validation may raise concerns about the model's resilience and adaptability to other restaurant environments. The study does not fully account for how Bangladesh's cultural, economic, and regulatory context may uniquely shape restaurant staff's KAP, potentially limiting the generalizability of the findings. Future research should therefore incorporate comparative analysis, cross‐country validation, and longitudinal design to assess the stability and predictive validity of the SEM while accounting for local and regional variations.

4. Conclusion

Restaurant staff exhibited a strong awareness of food allergies and employed effective strategies to prevent cross‐contamination, thereby safeguarding customers with allergies. However, their food allergy management practices were found to be insufficient when it came to double‐checking or rectifying mistakes related to the preparation of food. Additionally, staff members conveyed a lack of confidence regarding their participation in food allergy training courses or workshops aimed at enhancing their knowledge of food allergies. Many of the staff members did not agree on whether managing food allergies was part of their responsibilities. The SEM indicated that the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of the restaurant staff regarding food allergens exhibited a satisfactory fit. While knowledge of food allergies does not directly influence management practices, attitudes toward food allergies do have a significant impact on those practices. A substantial correlation was discovered between knowledge and attitude as well. Addressing gaps in training and clarifying responsibilities related to food allergies are essential steps toward improving staff confidence and competence. By fostering a culture of safety and accountability, restaurants can ensure a safer dining experience for all customers, particularly those with food allergies, ultimately contributing to greater customer satisfaction and trust.

Author Contributions

Nitai Roy: conceptualization, methodology and study design, acquisition of data, supervision, validation, visualization, formal analysis and interpreting data, writing – original draft, writing – review and editing. Sultan Mahmud Imran: data curation, formal analysis and interpreting data, visualization, and writing – review and editing. Sourav Chandra Debnath: data curation, visualization, writing – review and editing. Abdullah Al Adib: visualization, writing – original draft, writing – review and editing. Samia Sultana: visualization, writing – review and editing. Sumana Mahmud: visualization, writing – review and editing. Rejwana Rashid: visualization, writing – review and editing. Ekhtear Hossain: visualization, writing – review and editing. Farhadul Islam: visualization, writing – review and editing. Kamal Krishna Biswas: visualization, writing – review and editing. All the authors approved the final version of the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

The researchers express their thanks to all restaurant employees who kindly devoted their time to participate in this study by filling out the survey.

Roy, N. , Imran S. M., Debnath S. C., et al. 2025. “Food Allergy Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Among Restaurant's Staff in Bangladesh: A Structural Modeling Approach.” Food Science & Nutrition 13, no. 8: e70754. 10.1002/fsn3.70754.

Funding: The authors received no specific funding for this work.

Data Availability Statement

Data will be made available on request.

References

  1. Agwa, Y. 2023. “A Study of Food Allergy Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices of Restaurant Employees.” International Journal of Tourism and Hospitality Management 6, no. 1: 229–244. 10.21608/ijthm.2023.300885. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ahmed, M. R. 2023. “Household Consumption Expenditure Behaviour Towards Outside Ready‐Made Food: Evidence From Bangladesh.” Heliyon 9, no. 9: e19793. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19793. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ahuja, R. , and Sicherer S. H.. 2007. “Food‐Allergy Management From the Perspective of Restaurant and Food Establishment Personnel.” Annals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology 98, no. 4: 344–348. 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)60880-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Ajala, A. R. , Cruz A. G., Faria J., Walter E. H. M., Granato D., and Ana A. S. S.. 2010. “Food Allergens: Knowledge and Practices of Food Handlers in Restaurants.” Food Control 21, no. 10: 1318–1321. 10.1016/j.foodcont.2010.04.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ali, M. R. , Talukder A. H., Molla M. T., et al. 2020. “Prevalence, Severity and Risk Factors of Food Allergy and Food Addiction Among the People of Tangail District, Bangladesh.” International Journal of Community Medicine and Public Health 7, no. 10: 3810. 10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20204343. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bailey, S. , Kindratt T. B., Smith H., and Reading D.. 2014. “Food Allergy Training Event for Restaurant Staff; A Pilot Evaluation.” Clinical and Translational Allergy 4, no. 1: 26. 10.1186/2045-7022-4-26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bangladesh Food Safety Authority . 2017. “Bangladesh Issues Packaged Food Labelling Act 2017.” https://agriexchange.apeda.gov.in/IR_Standards/Import_Regulation/BangladeshissuesPackagedFoodLabellingAct2017DhakaBangladesh03042021.pdf.
  8. Baser, F. , Ture H., Abubakirova A., Sanlier N., and Cil B.. 2017. “Structural Modeling of the Relationship Among Food Safety Knowledge, Attitude and Behavior of Hotel Staff in Turkey.” Food Control 73: 438–444. 10.1016/j.foodcont.2016.08.032. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  9. Browon, M. , and Cudeck R.. 1993. “Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit.” In Testing Structural Equation Models, edited by Bollen K. A. and Long J. S., 136–162. Sage. [Google Scholar]
  10. Bujaka, J. , and Riekstina‐Dolge R.. 2019. “Food Allergy Knowledge and Practice of Restaurant Staff.” Foodbalt: 227–231. 10.22616/foodbalt.2019.012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  11. Carter, C. A. , Pistiner M., Wang J., and Sharma H. P.. 2020. “Food Allergy in Restaurants Work Group Report.” Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice 8, no. 1: 70–74. 10.1016/j.jaip.2019.09.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. CDC . 2024. “Food Allergy Reactions.” https://www.cdc.gov/restaurant‐food‐safety/php/practices/food‐allergy‐reactions.html.
  13. Dhaka Tribune . 2022. “Hospitality and the Restaurant Sectors Grows 58% in 11 Years.” https://www.dhakatribune.com/business/279949/hospitality‐and‐the‐restaurant‐sectors‐grows‐58%25.
  14. Dupuis, R. , Meisel Z., Grande D., et al. 2016. “Food Allergy Management Among Restaurant Workers in a Large U.S. City.” Food Control 63: 147–157. 10.1016/j.foodcont.2015.11.026. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  15. Elsahoryi, N. A. , Alkurd R., Ahmad L., Olaimat A. N., Hammad F., and Holley R.. 2021. “Food Allergy Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices (KAP) Among Restaurant's Staff in Jordan: A Cross‐Sectional Study.” British Food Journal 123, no. 9: 3056–3069. 10.1108/BFJ-06-2020-0522. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  16. Eren, R. , Çetin M., Eren A., and Çetin K.. 2021. “Food Allergy Knowledge, Attitude, and Practices of Chefs in Resort Hotels in Turkey.” International Journal of Gastronomy and Food Science 24: 100345. 10.1016/j.ijgfs.2021.100345. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  17. FDA . 2024. “Food Allergies: What You Need to Know.” https://www.fda.gov/media/180903/download?attachment.
  18. Food Allergen Labeling and Consumer Protection Act (FALCPA) . 2004. “Food Allergen Labeling and Consumer Protection Act of 2004 (FALCPA).” https://www.fda.gov/food/food‐allergensgluten‐free‐guidance‐documents‐regulatory‐information/food‐allergen‐labeling‐and‐consumer‐protection‐act‐2004‐falcpa. [DOI] [PubMed]
  19. Food Allergy Canada . 2023. “Foodservice Training and Resources.” https://www.foodallergycanada.ca.
  20. Fornell, C. , and Larcker D. F.. 1981. “Evaluating Structural Equation Models With Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error.” Journal of Marketing Research 18, no. 1: 39–50. [Google Scholar]
  21. Garayoa, R. , Vitas A. I., Díez‐Leturia M., and García‐Jalón I.. 2011. “Food Safety and the Contract Catering Companies: Food Handlers, Facilities and HACCP Evaluation.” Food Control 22, no. 12: 2006–2012. [Google Scholar]
  22. Gupta, R. , Marvel J., Tassinari P., et al. 2023. “Global Prevalence of Pediatric and Adult Ige‐Mediated Food Allergies: Results: From the Assess Fa Study.” Annals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology 131, no. 5: S7–S8. 10.1016/j.anai.2023.08.039. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  23. Hair, J. F. 2010. Multivariate Data Analysis: A Global Perspective. Pearson eBooks. https://ci.nii.ac.jp/ncid/BB03463866. [Google Scholar]
  24. Hair, J. F., Jr. , Anderson R. E., Tatham R. L., and Black W. C.. 1988. Multivariate Data Analysis. 5th ed. Prentice Hall. [Google Scholar]
  25. Hasan, M. J. , Uddin R., and Rabiul Islam G. M.. 2022. “Structural Modeling to Understand the Relationship Among Food Safety Knowledge, Attitude, and Self‐Reported HACCP Practices in Restaurant Employees in Bangladesh.” PLOS Global Public Health 2: e0000103. 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Hashanuzzaman, M. , Bhowmik S., Rahman M. S., Zakaria M. U. M. A., Voumik L. C., and Mamun A. A.. 2020. “Assessment of Food Safety Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices of Fish Farmers and Restaurants Food Handlers in Bangladesh.” Heliyon 6, no. 11: e05485. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05485. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Hu, L. , and Bentler P. M.. 1999. “Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria Versus New Alternatives.” Structural Equation Modeling a Multidisciplinary Journal 6, no. 1: 1–55. 10.1080/10705519909540118. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  28. Islam, M. N. , Hassan H. F., Amin M. B., et al. 2022. “Food Safety and Handling Knowledge and Practices Among University Students of Bangladesh: A Cross‐Sectional Study.” Heliyon 8, no. 12: e11987. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Jianu, C. , and Goleţ I.. 2019. “Food Allergies: Knowledge and Practice Among Food Service Workers Operating in Western Romania.” Journal of Food Protection 82, no. 2: 207–216. 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-18-170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Jubayer, M. F. , Kayshar M. S., Hossain M. S., Uddin M. N., Al‐Emran M., and Akter S. S.. 2020. “Evaluation of Food Safety Knowledge, Attitude, and Self‐Reported Practices of Trained and Newly Recruited Untrained Workers of Two Baking Industries in Dhaka, Bangladesh.” Heliyon 6, no. 9: e05021. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Kline, R. B. 2015. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. Guilford publications. [Google Scholar]
  32. Lee, Y. M. , and Sozen E.. 2016. “Food Allergy Knowledge and Training Among Restaurant Employees.” International Journal of Hospitality Management 57: 52–59. 10.1016/j.ijhm.2016.05.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  33. Lee, Y. M. , and Xu H. M.. 2015. “Food Allergy Knowledge, Attitudes, and Preparedness Among Restaurant Managerial Staff.” Journal of Foodservice Business Research 18, no. 5: 454–469. 10.1080/15378020.2015.1093452. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  34. Lessa, K. , Lozano M., Esteve M., and Frigola A.. 2016. “Food Allergy Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices: A Pilot Study of the General Public and Food Handlers.” European Journal of Nutrition & Food Safety 6, no. 2: 58–64. 10.9734/ejnfs/2016/20696. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  35. Leung, A. S. Y. , Wong G. W. K., and Tang M. L. K.. 2018. “Food Allergy in the Developing World.” Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology 141, no. 1: 76–78.e1. 10.1016/j.jaci.2017.11.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Lim, T. P. , Chye F. Y., Sulaiman M. R., Suki N. M., and Lee J. S.. 2016. “A Structural Modeling on Food Safety Knowledge, Attitude, and Behaviour Among Bum Bum Island Community of Semporna, Sabah.” Food Control 60: 241–246. 10.1016/j.foodcont.2015.07.042. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  37. Loerbroks, A. , Tolksdorf S. J., Wagenmann M., and Smith H.. 2019. “Food Allergy Knowledge, Attitudes and Their Determinants Among Restaurant Staff: A Cross‐Sectional Study.” PLoS One 14, no. 4: e0214625. 10.1371/journal.pone.0214625. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Lopez, C. M. 2023. Food Allergies. StatPearls Publishing. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK482187/. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. López‐Calvo, R. , Hidalgo‐Víquez C., Mora‐Villalobos V., et al. 2022. “Analysis of Knowledge, Attitude, and Practices (KAP) Regarding Food Allergies in Social Network Users in Costa Rica.” Food Control 138: 109031. 10.1016/j.foodcont.2022.109031. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  40. McAdams, B. , Deng A., and MacLaurin T.. 2018. “Food Allergy Knowledge, Attitudes, and Resources of Restaurant Employees.” British Food Journal 120, no. 11: 2681–2694. 10.1108/BFJ-01-2018-0028. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  41. Moore, L. E. , Stewart P. H., and deShazo R. D.. 2017. “Food Allergy: What We Know Now.” American Journal of the Medical Sciences 353, no. 4: 353–366. 10.1016/j.amjms.2016.11.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Mulaik, S. A. , James L. R., Van Alstine J., Bennett N., Lind S., and Stilwell C. D.. 1989. “Evaluation of Goodness‐of‐Fit Indices for Structural Equation Models.” Psychological Bulletin 105, no. 3: 430–445. 10.1037/0033-2909.105.3.430. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  43. Nasseredine, S. , El Harake M. D., Kharroubi S. A., and Toufeili I.. 2021. “Food Allergy Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices of Foodservice Workers at Restaurants in Lebanon: Findings From a National Cross‐Sectional Study.” Food Control 130: 108380. 10.1016/j.foodcont.2021.108380. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  44. Peiris, K. , Sciences E. H. B. S. O. H., and Heacock H.. 2015. “A Study on Allergen Knowledge and Its Perceived Importance in Food Safety.” BCIT Environmental Public Health Journal. 10.47339/ephj.2015.132. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  45. Radke, T. J. , Brown L. G., Hoover E. R., et al. 2016. “Food Allergy Knowledge and Attitudes of Restaurant Managers and Staff: An EHS‐Net Study.” Journal of Food Protection 79, no. 9: 1588–1598. 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-16-085. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Saleh‐Langenberg, J. , Vries S., Bak E., Kollen B., Blok B., and Dubois A.. 2017. “Incomplete and Incorrect Epinephrine Auto‐Injector Training to Food‐Allergic Patients by Pharmacists in The Netherlands.” Pediatric Allergy and Immunology 28, no. 3: 238–244. 10.1111/pai.12688. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Sarma, P. K. , Alam M. J., and Begum I. A.. 2022. “Red Meat Handlers' Food Safety Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices in the Dhaka Megacity of Bangladesh.” International Journal of Food Properties 25, no. 1: 1417–1431. 10.1080/10942912.2022.2083638. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  48. Schumacker, E. , and Lomax G.. 2016. A Beginner's Guide to Structural Equation Modelling. 4th ed. Routledge New York, NY. [Google Scholar]
  49. Shafie, A. A. , and Azman A. W.. 2015. “Assessment of Knowledge, Attitude and Practice of Food Allergies Among Food Handlers in the State of Penang, Malaysia.” Public Health 129, no. 9: 1278–1284. 10.1016/j.puhe.2015.03.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Sogut, A. , Kavut A. B., Kartal I., et al. 2015. “Food Allergy Knowledge and Attitude of Restaurant Personnel in Turkey.” International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology 5, no. 2: 157–161. 10.1002/alr.21427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Soon, J. M. 2018a. “‘No Nuts Please’: Food Allergen Management in Takeaways.” Food Control 91: 349–356. 10.1016/j.foodcont.2018.04.024. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  52. Soon, J. M. 2018b. “Structural Modelling of Food Allergen Knowledge, Attitude and Practices Among Consumers in Malaysia.” Food Research International 111: 674–681. 10.1016/j.foodres.2018.06.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Soon, J. M. 2019. “Food Allergen Knowledge, Attitude and Practices Among UK Consumers: A Structural Modelling Approach.” Food Research International 120: 375–381. 10.1016/j.foodres.2019.03.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Tan, A. , Trupp A., and Tan J.. 2023. “Dining out Safely With Food Allergies: A Comparative Perspective From Restaurant Managers and Servers in Malaysia.” International Food Research Journal 30, no. 3: 750–763. 10.47836/ifrj.30.3.17. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  55. USDA . 2024. “Food Allergies: The “Big 9”.” https://www.fsis.usda.gov/food‐safety/safe‐food‐handling‐and‐preparation/food‐safety‐basics/food‐allergies‐big‐9.
  56. Versluis, A. , Knulst A. C., Kruizinga A. G., et al. 2015. “Frequency, Severity and Causes of Unexpected Allergic Reactions to Food: A Systematic Literature Review.” Clinical and Experimental Allergy 45, no. 2: 347–367. 10.1111/cea.12328. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Warren, C. M. , Jiang J., and Gupta R. S.. 2020. “Epidemiology and Burden of Food Allergy.” Current Allergy and Asthma Reports 20, no. 2: 6. 10.1007/s11882-020-0898-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Wham, C. A. , and Sharma K. M.. 2014. “Knowledge of Café and Restaurant Managers to Provide a Safe Meal to Food Allergic Consumers.” Nutrition and Dietetics 71, no. 4: 265–269. 10.1111/1747-0080.12104. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  59. Wojtyniak, K. , Krauze A., and Szczęsna M.. 2013. “Knowledge of Food Allergy Among Staff of Warsaw Restaurants.” Alergia Astma Immunologia 18, no. 1: 50–54. http://www.embase.com/search/results?subaction=viewrecord&from=export&id=L372170513. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Data will be made available on request.


Articles from Food Science & Nutrition are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES