Skip to main content
. 2025 Apr 30;3:imag_a_00548. doi: 10.1162/imag_a_00548

Table 5.

Comparison of the different models considered in the ablation experiments.

Model
Metric Baseline No biophysical maps No multitask No pretraining Diffusion only MT only 50% samples in pretraining 75% samples in pretraining
Genu (% error in mean) 4.32% ± 4.86% 4.56% ± 4.67% 4.77% ± 5.14% 4.77% ± 4.97% 4.33% ± 4.50% 4.59% ± 4.61% 4.65% ± 4.83% 6.30% ± 6.91%
Body (% error in mean) 2.79% ± 2.73% 2.55% ± 2.17% 3.40% ± 3.39% 2.41% ± 2.30% 2.08% ± 1.78% 2.66% ± 2.66% 2.59% ± 2.38% 3.07% ± 2.77%
Splenium (% error in mean) 3.02% ± 2.30% 2.56% ± 2.04% 2.33% ± 1.91% 3.37% ± 2.97% 2.64% ± 2.26% 3.28% ± 2.69% 3.25% ± 2.98% 4.59% ± 3.87%
Genu effect size 1.76 ± 1.23 1.32 ± 1.30 1.13 ± 0.88 1.53 ± 1.39 1.09 ± 1.06 1.83 ± 1.61 1.41 ± 1.00 0.62 ± 0.45
Body effect size 3.02 ± 3.19 1.57 ± 1.65 2.86 ± 3.05 2.08 ± 1.96 2.70 ± 2.77 0.91 ± 0.61 1.96 ± 2.06 1.98 ± 2.20
Splenium effect size -0.39 ± -0.29 -0.48 ± -0.38 -0.49 ± -0.47 -0.09 ± -0.06 0.17 ± 0.33 1.06 ± 1.42 0.14 ± 0.18 -0.12 ± -0.05
JSD g-ratio 0.24 ± 0.25 0.23 ± 0.23 0.23 ± 0.23 0.28 ± 0.28 0.24 ± 0.24 0.22 ± 0.22 0.24 ± 0.23 0.29 ± 0.30
KLD g-ratio 1.42 ± 1.53 1.20 ± 1.20 0.96 ± 0.95 2.07 ± 2.11 1.13 ± 1.17 0.78 ± 0.78 0.96 ± 0.96 2.18 ± 2.39
JSD axon diameter 0.23 ± 0.23 0.23 ± 0.23 0.23 ± 0.23 0.26 ± 0.26 0.22 ± 0.21 0.23 ± 0.23 0.23 ± 0.23 0.28 ± 0.28
KLD axon diameter 1.32 ± 1.38 1.28 ± 1.35 1.28 ± 1.30 1.84 ± 2.00 0.85 ± 0.89 1.24 ± 1.29 1.14 ± 1.21 1.75 ± 1.91