Skip to main content
Journal of Nutrition and Metabolism logoLink to Journal of Nutrition and Metabolism
. 2025 Jul 28;2025:8870958. doi: 10.1155/jnme/8870958

Linking Short-Chain Fatty Acids to Systemic Homeostasis: Mechanisms, Therapeutic Potential, and Future Directions

Yueru Zhao 1,2, Jing Chen 3, Yunlong Qin 2, Jinguo Yuan 2, Zixian Yu 2, Rui Ma 4, Fude Liu 5,, Jin Zhao 2,
PMCID: PMC12321436  PMID: 40761338

Abstract

Short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), pivotal metabolites derived from microbial fermentation of dietary fiber, serve as critical modulators of glucose and lipid metabolism. Dysregulation of SCFA levels, often stemming from inadequate fiber intake or dysbiosis of SCFA-producing microbiota, correlates with heightened susceptibility to diverse pathologies, including autoimmune disorders, metabolic syndromes, and malignancies. Emerging evidence underscores the pleiotropic roles of SCFAs in orchestrating gut and systemic homeostasis, positioning them as novel therapeutic candidates for immune dysregulation, inflammatory conditions, and transplant rejection. This review synthesizes current knowledge on SCFA biosynthesis, absorption dynamics, and their multifaceted regulatory mechanisms, spanning epigenetic modulation, G protein–coupled receptor (GPR) signaling, and immune cell crosstalk. We further elucidate their therapeutic potential in clinical contexts, emphasizing their capacity to recalibrate immune responses, suppress chronic inflammation, and mitigate oncogenesis. By integrating recent advances in microbiome research and translational applications, this work highlights the imperative for precision interventions targeting SCFA pathways to bridge the gap between microbial ecology and clinical innovation.

Keywords: gut microbiota, histone deacetylases inhibitor, immune homeostasis, short-chain fatty acids, tumorigenesis

1. Introduction

The gastrointestinal tract represents a dynamic ecosystem where host cells, immune mediators, and microbial metabolites collaboratively maintain equilibrium. Perturbations in gut homeostasis are implicated in the pathogenesis of diverse conditions, including inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) [1], obesity [2], diabetes [3], colorectal cancer (CRC) [4], coronary heart disease [5], kidney diseases [6, 7], and neuropsychiatric conditions [8, 9]. Among microbial metabolites, SCFAs, primarily acetate, propionate, and butyrate, have emerged as keystone molecules linking dietary patterns, microbiota composition, and host physiology. Synthesized through anaerobic fermentation of indigestible polysaccharides, SCFAs exert systemic effects via receptor-mediated signaling, epigenetic regulation, and metabolic reprogramming [1012].

Despite promising preclinical data, clinical translation remains hindered by incomplete mechanistic insights and interindividual variability in intervention outcomes. Current strategies, such as SCFA enemas [13] or oral supplementation [14], demonstrate partial efficacy, necessitating a deeper understanding of context-dependent SCFA actions. Additionally, the multifaceted regulatory effects exerted by dietary fiber (DF)–derived SCFAs as biological mediators may also underscore their promising preventive potential in mitigating numerous prevalent diseases through simple and cost-effective dietary intervention. This review advances the discourse by delineating tissue-specific SCFA effects, dissecting their immune-metabolic interplay, and proposing targeted therapeutic frameworks. By synthesizing cutting-edge research, we aim to catalyze the development of SCFA-centric therapies tailored to individual microbiome profiles and disease states.

2. Biosynthesis and Bioavailability of SCFAs

2.1. Microbial Pathways of SCFA Production

SCFA biosynthesis is intricately linked to microbial substrate utilization. Resistant starch and amino acids serve as primary precursors, with cysteine, alanine, serine, glutamate, and basic amino acids (lysine, histidine) contributing to acetate and butyrate synthesis via cross-feeding pathways [15, 16]. Pyruvate conversion via the Wood–Ljungdahl pathway or acetyl-CoA synthetase is predominant in Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes [17]. Cross-feeding mechanisms involve the conversion of acetate to butyrate by Faecalibacterium prausnitzii and Roseburia spp., mediated by the enzyme butyryl-CoA:acetate CoA-transferase [18, 19]. Specialized species, such as Eubacterium rectale, Eubacterium ramulus, and Coprococcus-related strain L2-50, have the capacity to directly utilize glucose for butyrate formation owing to the existence of phosphotransferase and butyrate-kinase [18, 20]. In addition, certain bacteria belonging to Firmicutes, Fusobacteriales, and Bacteroidetes employ amino acids to yield butyrate via the lysine, glutarate, and 4-aminobutyrate metabolic pathways [21]. Propionate synthesis is mediated through succinate, acrylate, and propanediol pathways, with taxonomic specificity. The acrylate pathway, found only in a limited number of Negativicutes and Lachnospiraceae, utilizes lactate to enhance propionate production. Additionally, deoxy sugars, like fucose and Rhamnose, serve as precursors for propionate formation in Lachnospiraceae species, Ruminococcus obeum, and Roseburia inulinivorans through the propanediol pathway [22]. Unlike acetate, propionate, and butyrate, primarily from carbohydrate fermentation, branched-chain fatty acids (BCFAs), such as isobutyrate and isovalerate, originate from microbial proteolysis of valine and leucine [23]. Valerate arises via both carbohydrate by Megasphaera spp. and amino acid pathways by Clostridium spp. [2426]. BCFAs are biomarkers of protein fermentation, accumulating under high-protein/low-fiber diets or dysbiotic conditions [27, 28].

Environmental factors, including pH, nutrient availability, and redox potential, modulate microbial community structure and SCFA output [29, 30]. For instance, iron limitation enhances butyrate production by favoring obligate anaerobes, while peptide abundance shifts metabolic flux toward proteolytic SCFA generation, suggesting environmental adaptability in SCFA synthesis [30].

2.2. Absorption and Systemic Distribution

Given that the pH of the colon ranges from 5.5 to 6.7, most SCFAs exist as ions in the intestinal tract, with only a small fraction of undissociated SCFAs passively diffusing into epithelial cells [31]. Approximately 90%–95% of SCFAs are absorbed in the colon and cecum, primarily via monocarboxylate transporter 1 (MCT1/SLC16A1), sodium-coupled monocarboxylate transporter 1 (SMCT1/SLC5A8), and passive diffusion [32]. Regional concentration gradients (70–140 mM proximally vs. 20–70 mM distally) reflect differential epithelial absorption rates and microbial activity [33]. MCT1 demonstrates broad apical and basolateral membrane localization throughout colonic epithelial cells, whereas SMCT1 and MCT4 (SLC16A3) show exclusive apical and basolateral membrane expression, respectively [34]. These three transporters display tripartite affinity for acetate, propionate, and butyrate with differential transport kinetics [32]. In contrast, the low-affinity transporter SMCT2 (SLC5A12), predominantly expressed in the small intestine, specifically mediates the absorption of diet-derived SCFAs rather than those produced through bacterial fermentation [34, 35]. The simultaneous transport of SCFAs through the transporters is accompanied by the absorption of sodium and chloride ions and the secretion of bicarbonate, thereby maintaining intestinal electrolyte balance [34]. Postabsorption, hepatic first-pass metabolism limits systemic butyrate and propionate to micromolar levels, whereas acetate circulates widely, due to peripheral tissue utilization [36] (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Absorption and systemic distribution of SCFAs. Dietary fiber undergoes microbial fermentation to produce SCFAs, which are absorbed by colon and intestinal epithelia via MCT1/4 and SMCT1/2 transporters. H+ gradients and Na+ symport mechanisms facilitate cellular uptake and systemic dissemination, enabling SCFAs to exert pleiotropic effects across tissues. SCFAs, short-chain fatty acids; MCT, monocarboxylate transporters; SMCT, sodium-coupled monocarboxylate transporter.

3. SCFAs in Immune Equilibrium

3.1. Antibody Response and B-Cell Regulation

Butyrate, via suppressing Histone deacetylase (HDAC) activity, transcriptionally regulates critical B-cell functional genes, such as Aicda, Xbp1, and Prdm1, leading to inhibition of class-switch recombination (CSR), somatic hypermutation (SHM), and plasma cell differentiation [37]. Notably, propionate exhibits dose-associated regulatory effects on CSR processes. Low concentration of propionate moderately enhances CSR and SHM through homeostatic immunomodulation, while elevated SCFA levels within a broad physiological range demonstrate therapeutic potential in autoimmune conditions, as evidenced by their immunosuppressive effects in murine lupus models [38, 39]. In contrast, acetate demonstrates distinct immunoregulatory properties by enhancing IgA specificity through CD4+ T-cell interactions while simultaneously promoting T-cell-independent IgA production via GPR43 signaling [40, 41].

SCFAs collectively orchestrate immunoglobulin production through dendritic cell (DC)–mediated pathways. These microbial metabolites stimulate B-cell activating factor secretion and enhance ALDH1a2 expression, thereby facilitating IgA and IgG synthesis in B lymphocytes [42]. Oral administration of SCFAs and DF significantly elevated cecal IgA and serum IgG levels through energy metabolism of plasma cells. This metabolic enhancement involves multiple pathways: increased acetyl-CoA production, elevated fatty acid synthesis, glycolytic pathway activation, and augmented mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation [43].

In clinical applications, Clostridium butyricum–derived butyrate demonstrated therapeutic efficacy in allergic disorders through HDAC1 inhibition, particularly enhancing given regulatory B-cell (Bregs) populations and interleukin-10 (IL-10) expression during specific immunotherapy [44, 45]. Mechanistically, butyrate activates the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway in Bregs, promoting IL-10 secretion [46]. Furthermore, it potentiates Breg functionality through upregulation of 5-hydroxyindole-3-acetic acid (5-HIAA), a serotonin-derived aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) agonist. This cascade ultimately suppresses germinal center B-cell proliferation and inhibits terminal plasma cell differentiation, establishing butyrate as a critical immune-metabolic regulator in both physiological and pathological immune responses [47].

3.2. T-Cell Polarization and Plasticity

The regulatory effects of SCFAs on Treg cells and effector T cells are highly complex, involving cytokine environment, immune status, and dependent on the HDI activity [48]. Butyrate induces extrathymic Treg differentiation via FOXP3 acetylation, whereas acetate and propionate enhance colonic Treg accumulation through GPR43 signaling [49, 50]. Research by Martin-Gallausiaux et al. demonstrated that butyrate upregulates the SP1 signaling pathway and amplifies transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) expression in intestinal epithelial cells, thereby driving localized Treg accumulation in the gut [51]. Furthermore, under immune homeostasis, SCFAs activate the mTOR–S6K pathway to promote the differentiation of naïve T cells into IL-10+ Treg [48, 52]. Intriguingly, the butyrate receptor, GPR109A, expressed on macrophages and DCs, indirectly facilitates the Foxp3+ and IL-10+ Treg differentiation [53]. Valerate enhances IL-10 production and suppresses IL-17 expression by improving lymphocyte metabolism and modulating their epigenetic status, respectively [54].

During active immune responses, however, acetate and propionate remarkably support the polarization of naïve T cells into T helper (Th) subsets, such as Th1 and Th17 cells, and regulate interferon-γ (IFN-γ), IL-10, and IL-17 secretion via STAT3 and mTOR pathway [48]. SCFAs exhibit divergent regulatory effects on Th1 and Th17 differentiation. Butyrate positively influences Th1 development, promoting IFN-γ and T-bet expression during cell differentiation. Conversely, in the case of Th17 polarization, the differentiation and development of Th17 are suppressed by inhibiting IL-17, retinoic acid–related orphan receptor α (RoRα), and RoRγt [55]. Sun et al. [56] revealed SCFAs inhibit excessive Th1 activation and induce IL-10 production by the STAT3/mTOR axis. This mechanism correlates with the high GPR43 expression on Th1 cells, whereas naïve T cells exhibit limited responsiveness due to receptor scarcity [48, 55]. Similarly, butyrate restrains hyperactive immune responses during Th17 differentiation by inducing Blimp-1 and IL-10 [55]. Notably, Blimp-1 has demonstrated therapeutic potential in autoimmune disease models by modulating Th1/Th17 differentiation and Treg function, suggesting that SCFA-mediated Blimp-1 activation may offer novel immunosuppressive therapeutic strategies [57].

Additionally, SCFAs critically regulate the Th9/IL-9 axis. In dextran sulfate sodium (DSS)–induced colitis model, anti-IL-9 antibody administration alleviated disease severity [58]. Butyrate and propionate selectively upregulate FOXP3 gene expression while inhibiting Th9 differentiation and infiltration in ovalbumin-induced pneumonia. Conversely, adoptive transfer of Th9 cells or exogenous IL-9 exacerbated eosinophil infiltration and counteracted SCFA-mediated anti-inflammatory effects, confirming that SCFAs mitigate excessive inflammation by targeting the Th9/IL-9 [59]. Collectively, these findings elucidate the multidimensional regulatory network through which SCFAs govern T-cell fate, providing a theoretical foundation for precision immunotherapy in immune-related disorders.

3.3. Mononuclear Phagocyte Regulation

DF and its microbial fermentation–derived SCFAs modulate mononuclear phagocyte activity through multifaceted pathways critical for immune homeostasis. A high-fiber diet promotes the differentiation of bone marrow-derived Ly6C-patrolling monocytes, thereby suppressing neutrophil-driven hyperinflammatory responses against viral infections. Concurrently, SCFAs enhance CD8+ T-cell metabolism and antiviral functionality via epigenetic [60]. Mechanistically, SCFAs regulate cytokine dynamics in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) by suppressing monocyte chemotactic protein-1 (MCP-1), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), and IFN-γ, while modulating prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) and IL-10 production [6163]. Notably, dose- and time-dependent effects are evident, whereby elevated SCFA concentrations (> 2 mM) induce proinflammatory cytokines (IL-8, IL-6, IL-1β, TNF-α) in PBMCs and neutrophils through Toll-like receptor (TLR)–mediated signaling [64].

SCFAs exhibit remarkable adaptability in macrophage regulation, tailored to local or systemic immune contexts. In immunocompromised hosts with Klebsiella pneumoniae pneumonia, SCFA supplementation enhances macrophage phagocytic capacity by targeting LAMTOR2, a key effector of phagosome–lysosome fusion, and activating extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) signaling [65, 66]. Butyrate preferentially drives monocyte differentiation into macrophages with heightened antibacterial activity, coupled with glycolysis suppression and mTOR inhibition via HDI [67]. However, in murine models of Type 1 diabetes (T1D), acetate activates GPR43, triggering ERK-dependent apoptosis of infiltrating macrophages to resolve inflammation and improve glucose homeostasis [68]. Atherosclerotic plaque stability is further influenced by butyrate, which reduces macrophage adhesion and migration via downregulation of CD36, proinflammatory factors, nuclear factor κb (NF-κB), and steroid receptor coactivator (Src) activity [6971]. Additionally, butyrate reprograms IL-4-induced M2-like macrophages into highly phagocytic phenotypes with diminished proinflammatory cytokine secretion [72].

The anti-inflammatory properties of SCFAs are mediated through distinct molecular pathways [72]. Butyrate suppresses NF-κB signaling pathway in macrophages, reducing nitric oxide (NO), TNF-α, and IL-12 production independently of IL-10, presenting a potential ecological approach for the management of colitis [73, 74]. GPR41/43 mediates the inhibitory effects of acetate on IL-6 and IL-8, as well as propionate or butyrate on IL-6 production, while HDI activity underlies their suppression of vascular adhesion molecules and PBMC adhesion, mitigating atherosclerosis risk [7577]. In addition, butyrate upregulates IL-10 and IL-18 secretion by intestinal epithelial cells, macrophages, and DCs through GPR109A signaling, reinforcing epithelial integrity, and dampening inflammation [78]. Similarly, acetate from Escherichia coli KUB-36 downregulates IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, and TNF-α, while elevating anti-inflammatory IL-10 [79]. These findings underscore SCFAs as versatile immunomodulators with context-dependent roles in balancing inflammatory responses and maintaining immune equilibrium.

3.4. Granulocyte Modulation

Persistent neutrophil infiltration during chronic inflammation significantly exacerbates barrier dysfunction and tissue damage [80, 81]. SCFAs exert early-stage regulatory effects on monocytes, effectively attenuating neutrophil recruitment, a mechanism validated across multiple inflammatory models [60, 82]. DF deficiency disrupts gut microbiota homeostasis, elevating chemokine ligands (CXCL) 1 and CXCL2 on neutrophil surfaces, thereby enhancing susceptibility to inflammatory triggers such as DSS [82].

SCFAs demonstrate stage-specific modulation of neutrophil activity, reflecting their dual role in resolving acute infections and mitigating chronic inflammation. In GPR43-deficient mice, short-term lipopolysaccharide (LPS) stimulation (1 h) elicited a surge in the rolling and adhesion of neutrophils, whereas prolonged LPS exposure (4 h) reduced neutrophil velocity and amplified vascular accumulation, indicative of SCFA-dependent regulation of infection dynamics [83, 84]. Furthermore, SCFAs prolong neutrophil migration by the induction of cytokine-induced neutrophil chemoattractant-2αβ (CINC-2αβ) production and L-selectin expression [85]. An experiment found that oral tributyrin visibly ameliorated inflammatory symptoms in mice. Oral tributyrin administration attenuates murine inflammatory symptoms by suppressing TNF-α, CINC-2αβ, and NO synthesis by neutrophils via HDAC and NF-κB pathway inhibition, highlighting its therapeutic potential despite its short half-life [86]. Notably, butyrate and propionate induce caspase-8/9-mediated apoptosis in both activated and quiescent neutrophils [87, 88], with mature neutrophils additionally relying on GPR109A signaling for programmed cell death [89].

In allergic inflammation, SCFAs restore eosinophil homeostasis by downregulating transcription and expression of BCL-XL and MCL-1 [90]. Butyrate specifically inhibits eosinophil hyperactivity by reducing CD44, CD49d, and chemokine receptor (CCR) 3, counteracting IL-5-driven adhesion and migration [9092]. SCFAs further modulate eosinophil activity indirectly by inhibiting Th9 differentiation and impairing their immunostimulatory functions [59]. In basophils, acetate targets GPR41 to suppress Ca2+ influx, while propionate and butyrate boost degranulation and modulate apoptosis, accompanied by IL-13 upregulation and IL-4 downregulation [93, 94] (Figure 2).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Immunomodulatory roles of SCFAs in maintaining immune equilibrium. SCFAs regulate immune cell functions via GPR41/43/109A, HDAC inhibition pathways. Key mechanisms include promoting Treg differentiation, enhancing Breg activity, and suppressing proinflammatory cytokines. SCFAs modulate apoptosis, phagocytosis, and cytokine release, balancing immune activation and tolerance through epigenetic and metabolic reprogramming. HDACs, histone deacetylases; GPR, G protein–coupled receptors; Breg, regulatory B cell; Treg, regulatory T cell; CSR, class-switch recombination; SHM, somatic hypermutation; mTOR, mammalian target of rapamycin; AhR, aryl hydrocarbon receptor; 5-HIAA, 5-hydroxyindole-3-acetic acid; TGF-β, transforming growth factor-β; Th1, T helper cell 1; IL-10, interleukin 10; EPK, eukaryotic protein kinase; NF-κB, nuclear factor kappa-B; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor-α; NO, nitric oxide.

3.5. Regulation of Mucosal Immunity

SCFAs critically shape mucosal immune responses, extending to systemic sites, like the airway, particularly in the context of allergic inflammation. In food allergy, by reinforcing intestinal epithelial integrity and modulating DC function, SCFAs promote oral tolerance [95]. Butyrate strengthens tight junctions (e.g., upregulating ZO-1, occludin, and claudin-1) and mucin production, reducing allergen translocation and subsequent systemic sensitization [9698]. Concurrently, SCFAs promote IL-10-producing Tregs and Bregs, which suppress mast cell degranulation and IgE production, key drivers of anaphylaxis in food allergy [47, 94]. Clinically, Clostridium butyricum–derived butyrate amplifies Breg populations and IL-10 secretion during allergen-specific immunotherapy, demonstrating efficacy in allergic rhinitis and asthma [44, 45]. This is mechanistically linked to butyrate-induced mTOR activation in Bregs and upregulation of the AhR agonist 5-HIAA, which suppresses germinal center hyperactivity [46, 47]. Isobutyrate enhances gut barrier function via GPR109A, concurrently increasing the levels of beneficial metabolites, SCFAs, and 3-hydroxybutyric acid and suppressing TLR4/MyD88/NF-κB signaling pathway to exert anti-inflammatory properties [99].

In asthma, SCFAs attenuate eosinophilic inflammation through dual mechanisms, involving direct granulocyte modulation and suppression of the Th9/IL-9 axis [59, 90, 92]. Notably, SCFAs further mitigate asthma by restoring gut–lung axis homeostasis. High-fiber diets elevate circulating butyrate, which suppresses lung IL-33 release and Type 2 innate lymphoid cell (ILC2) activation [100, 101]. These findings position SCFAs as key modulators of mucosal immune equilibrium, with therapeutic potential for allergic and asthmatic disorders. Nevertheless, tissue-specific SCFA bioavailability and receptor, GPR41/43/109A, heterogeneity across mucosal sites warrant further investigation to optimize targeted therapies.

4. Biological Functions of SCFAs

4.1. SCFAs as Dual Modulators of Energy Metabolism and Systemic Regulation

SCFAs serve dual roles as metabolic substrates and systemic regulators. Collectively contributing to 10% of human energy expenditure, butyrate alone supplies 70% of intestinal energy via β-oxidation into acetyl-CoA in colonic epithelia, thereby sparing reliance on glucose and pyruvate oxidation [102104]. Propionate predominantly fuels hepatic gluconeogenesis, while 50%–70% of acetate is metabolized by the liver and peripheral tissues for acetyl-CoA synthesis [104].

Beyond energy provision, SCFAs exhibit systemic regulatory effects. Acetate and butyrate enhance glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and peptide YY (PYY) secretion through GPR41/43-independent mechanisms in acute settings [105], yet chronically upregulate these receptors via Ca2+-mediated signaling in colonic L cells [106]. Notably, DF-derived SCFAs improve glycemic control and weight management by activating intestinal gluconeogenesis (IGN). Butyrate directly stimulates IGN-associated genes via cAMP upregulation, whereas propionate engages gut–brain neural circuits to promote IGN. Notably, butyrate can also target these circuits to activate brown adipose tissue (BAT) [107, 108]. Additionally, butyrate suppresses hypothalamic neuropeptide Y-expressing orexigenic neurons [108], while acetate modulates appetite via glutamate–glutamine cycling and γ-aminobutyric acid synthesis [109]. In adipose and liver tissues, SCFAs activate mitochondrial fatty acid oxidation by constraining the activity and expression of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ (PPAR-γ) [110], while butyrate improves insulin sensitivity and increases energy expenditure in skeletal muscle and BAT via AMPK/p38 pathways and PPAR-γ coactivator-1α activation [110]. These multifaceted roles position SCFAs as therapeutic candidates for metabolic disorders like obesity and diabetes. BCFAs contribute to energy metabolism but may impair insulin sensitivity. Valerate and isovalerate are β-oxidized in hepatocytes, yielding acetyl-CoA and propionyl-CoA, yet chronic elevation associates with insulin resistance in obesity [111], underscoring the need to evaluate SCFA profiles holistically in metabolic disorders.

4.2. SCFAs in Shaping Gut Microbial Homeostasis

The colonic microbiota, comprising 1014 bacteria, relies on SCFAs to sustain mutualistic host–microbe interactions [112]. Pathological shifts in intestinal oxygen and nitrate levels favor facultative anaerobes (e.g., E. coli) [113116], disrupting the original stable microflora composition, which metabolize ethanolamine and choline into harmful metabolites like acetaldehyde and trimethylamine [117, 118]. Dietary interventions boosting SCFA precursors restore symbiosis by promoting carbohydrate fermentation, acidifying luminal pH, and activating PPAR-γ in colonic epithelia. This enhances mitochondrial β-oxidation, reduces oxygen diffusion, and suppresses nitrate availability, thereby fostering dominance of obligate anaerobes (e.g., Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes) [119, 120].

4.3. SCFAs as Antitumor Agents

Clinical evidence links CRC progression to diminished fecal SCFA levels [121123]. Butyrate-producing Clostridium butyricum suppressed Wnt/β-catenin signaling, induced tumor cell apoptosis, and attenuated high-fat diet-driven intestinal tumorigenesis in murine models [124, 125]. SCFAs exert antitumor effects heavily relying on anti-inflammatory mechanisms, counteracting chronic inflammation implicated in CRC pathogenesis [126129]. Propionate and butyrate enhance antitumor immunity by potentiating CD8+ T-cell activation, particularly in microsatellite instability CRC subtypes [130]. Tumor cells evade SCFA-mediated control by downregulating GPR43/109A and SLC5A8 transporters, which reduce butyrate/propionate uptake [131, 132]. Upon internalization by cancerous cells, SCFAs upregulate proapoptotic Bax, Bad, Bak, and FAS and suppress antiapoptotic Bcl-2 family members, which lead to caspase-3-activated mitochondrial apoptotic pathway and caspase-independent autophagy [133136]. Furthermore, GPR43 restoration in human colorectal adenocarcinoma cells (HCT)-8 triggered p21-mediated G1/G0 cell cycle arrest upon SCFA exposure [137].

5. Biological Mechanisms Underlying the Regulatory Functions of SCFAs

5.1. SCFAs Modulate Epigenetic Modifications via HDAC Inhibition

SCFAs exert direct inhibitory effects on HDACs by competitively displacing Zn2+ ions at their catalytic sites, thereby suppressing enzymatic activity and elevating histone acetylation levels. This epigenetic alteration initiates downstream cascades involving chromatin remodeling enzymes and miRNA, as well as DNA and histone methylation [138140]. Notably, HDACs exhibit structural complexity, multifunctional roles, and cell type-specific expression profiles. Their intricate interactions with diverse protein partners suggest that SCFA-mediated regulatory mechanisms extend beyond canonical pathways, warranting further investigation into unexplored molecular interfaces.

5.2. SCFAs Orchestrate Signaling Networks via GPR Activation

GPR41 and GPR43 exhibit differential tissue distribution and ligand selectivity. While GPR41 is ubiquitously expressed, GPR43 localizes to immune cells, adipocytes, enteroendocrine L cells, intestinal epithelial cells, and pancreatic islets β cells [141]. Among SCFAs, propionate demonstrates dual agonism for both receptors, whereas acetate preferentially activates GPR43. Butyrate and iso-butyrate exhibit higher affinity for GPR41 [141], whereas valerate and caproate display weaker activity [142]. SCFAs activate distinct GPRs, eliciting divergent signaling cascades dictated by Gα subunit specificity [141, 143]. GPR41 activation suppresses cAMP via Gi/o coupling, while GPR43 engages both Gi/o and Gq proteins, enabling cAMP inhibition or Ca2+/mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling, respectively [142].

Butyrate uniquely activates GPR109A, a Gi/o-coupled receptor expressed in adipocytes, immune cells, and intestinal epithelia, and retinal pigment epithelia [144]. Conversely, acetate and propionate stimulate that olfactory receptor (Olfr) 78, a renal and vascular receptor, in conjunction with GPR41, mediates SCFAs in blood pressure regulation [145]. Intriguingly, colonic Olfr78 activation in enteroendocrine cells regulates PYY secretion, linking SCFAs to gut hormone homeostasis and metabolic signaling [146]. This multilayered receptor interplay underscores SCFAs as versatile modulators of systemic physiology, with tissue-specific responses shaped by receptor expression patterns and ligand selectivity.

6. Potential Applications in Clinical Practice

The multifaceted role of SCFAs in modulating systemic homeostasis and underlying mechanisms underscores their therapeutic potential for managing chronic diseases. Below, we delineate the clinical implications of SCFAs across diverse pathologies, supported by emerging evidence from preclinical and clinical studies.

6.1. Diabetes Management

SCFAs exhibit promising efficacy in both T1D and T2D. In individuals with T1D and obesity/overweight, DF and carbohydrate intake positively correlate with fecal SCFA levels, particularly acetate, and promote the proliferation of SCFA-producing genera such as Roseburia and Ruminococcus gnavus [147]. Preclinical studies demonstrated that acetate and butyrate supplementation reduce diabetogenic cytokines (e.g., IL-21) and autoreactive T-cell populations in nonobese diabetic mice [148]. However, oral butyrate administration in longstanding T1D patients showed limited immunomodulatory effects, highlighting the need for optimized delivery strategies [14].

For T2D, dietary interventions enriched with SCFA precursors enhance glycemic control. Fermented milk supplementation elevated fecal acetate and attenuated systemic inflammation [149]. One randomized controlled trial (RCT) investigating diet treatment with white bean extract demonstrated improved glycemic control and reduced complications via microbiota-driven SCFA production [150]. Increased SCFA-producing bacterial diversity and abundance correlates with elevated GLP-1 secretion and improved hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels [151]. Besides, amylose-rich bread consumption reduced postprandial glucose in overweight individuals, linked to elevated plasma propionate [152]. The Mediterranean diet exhibited superiority over Western diets in terms of postprandial metabolism, as evidenced by a significant increase in postprandial plasma butyrate, directly related to improved insulin sensitivity and effective enhancement of glucose metabolism [153].

6.2. Obesity/Overweight and Metabolic Syndrome

SCFA-producing bacteria are pivotal in combating obesity/overweight. Prebiotic intake reduces neural responses to high-calorie stimuli, potentially mediated by Bifidobacteria and Lactobacillus enrichment, despite unchanged SCFA levels [154]. Similarly, Lactobacillus plantarum supplementation decreased body weight and BMI in overweight individuals, accompanied by a shift from Firmicutes to Bacteroidetes (especially Prevotella) dominance [155]. Targeted colonic delivery of propionate (via inulin-propionate ester) prevented weight gain and reduced both abdominal fat accumulation and hepatocellular lipid content [156]. Furthermore, administering SCFAs via colonic injection, particularly in the distal colon region [157], enhanced fat oxidation and energy expenditure in obese men [158], while oral butyrate improved metabolic parameters in pediatric obesity [159].

6.3. Cardiovascular Health and Hypertension

Butyrate inversely correlates with both systolic and diastolic blood pressure [160], exerting cardioprotective effects via L-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine modulation and Tregs cell expansion, thereby retarding the progression of hypertension and ventricular remodeling [161]. GPR41 and Olfr78 receptors regulate renin secretion and vascular tone, serving as the foundation for blood pressure management [145]. Oral or rectal administration of propionate mitigated vascular calcification by modulating gut microbiota composition, particularly through supplementation with Akkermansia muciniphila [162]. Moreover, in hypertensive individuals, dietary sodium reduction intake effectively elevated circulating caproate, improving arterial compliance [163].

6.4. IBD

SCFAs demonstrate therapeutic efficacy and response evaluation in IBD, particularly ulcerative colitis (UC) [1, 164, 165]. Depleted Roseburia hominis and Faecalibacterium prausnitzii in UC, a characteristic alteration [166], are partially restored by localized butyrate administration, often synergizing with 5-aminosalicylic acid [13, 167173]. Increased production of SCFAs can serve as an indicator of successful fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) [174]. In patients who exhibited effective response to FMT and experienced sustained improvement in clinical symptoms, the remission was found to be associated with butyrate-producer recovery and ButCoA gene modulation. The utilization of intestinal microbiota and its metabolites, such as SCFAs, holds promise as a predictive tool to assess the response of IBD patients toward biologic interventions. Recurrence, on the other hand, was linked to Bacteroidetes and Proteobacteria abundance along with low levels of Clostridium clusters IV and XIVa [175]. Anti-TNF-α responders exhibited enriched Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes and reduced levels of Proteobacteria and Actinobacteria [176, 177]. Furthermore, the observed elevation in endogenous metabolites such as butyrate and deoxycholic acid is closely associated with this process, holding promise as predictive tools to assess the response of IBD patients toward biologic interventions [176]. Sodium butyrate capsules improved circadian gene expression and clinical outcomes in active UC [178], though pediatric trials showed variable efficacy [179]. This lack of efficacy may be attributed to factors such as concentration and mode of administration, and utilization of pH-sensitive encapsulation techniques can delay the release of SCFAs and improve their bioavailability [179]. In line with this, oral microcapsules containing sodium butyrate have been shown to enhance the abundance of SCFAs producers in IBD patients, such as Lachnospiraceae spp. and Butyricicoccus, thereby exerting positive effects on clinical disease activity and quality of life [180]. Notably, dietary strategies, including low-fat/high-fiber regimens, can serve as a crucial adjunctive therapy, reducing inflammation and restoring microbiota balance, as evidenced by a significant increase in Bacteroidetes and decrease in Actinobacteria, which is strongly correlated with elevated acetate levels, consequently, improving the quality of life in UC [181]. Dietary intervention involving Tetrastigma hemsleyanum polysaccharides (THP) resulted in a reversal of the intestinal ecosystem composition and increased SCFAs, accompanied by enhanced GPR41/43 signaling, thereby alleviating symptoms in DSS-induced IBD mice [182].

6.5. CRC Prevention

SCFAs-mediated dietary intervention is a crucial approach for the prevention of CRC. The Mediterranean diet's protective effects in chronic noncommunicable diseases can be attributed to SCFAs in safeguarding intestinal homeostasis [153, 183186]. Disturbance in microbial composition characterized by reduced SCFA producers mediates the onset and progression of polyposis in mice. However, high-fiber diets can reverse this alteration and restore SCFA levels along with GPR109A expression, preventing carcinogenesis [53, 187]. Butyrylated starch exhibited a protective effect against the carcinogenic impacts of high-red meats diet by inhibiting O6-methyl-2-deoxyguanosine accumulation [188]. Additionally, probiotics mitigated chemotherapy-induced dysbiosis and boosted SCFA production [189].

SCFAs represent a cornerstone in the prevention and treatment of chronic diseases, including but not limited to diabetes, obesity, hypertension, IBD, and CRC. Their pleiotropic effects on metabolism, immunity, and microbiota composition underscore their translational potential. Future research should focus on optimizing SCFA delivery systems and validating clinical protocols to harness their full therapeutic promise. Personalized nutrition frameworks, integrating microbiome profiling and SCFA biomarkers, represent the next frontier in precision medicine.

7. Discussion and Future Perspectives

The comprehensive exploration of SCFAs in this review underscores their pivotal role as molecular orchestrators of host–microbiota crosstalk, immune equilibrium, and metabolic homeostasis. Emerging evidence positions SCFAs not merely as metabolic byproducts but as dynamic signaling molecules with pleiotropic therapeutic potential. However, translating these preclinical insights into clinical practice remains fraught with challenges, including dose- and context-dependent effects, interindividual microbiota variability, and bioavailability limitations. Addressing these gaps demands innovative strategies to harness SCFAs full therapeutic promise while navigating their biological complexity. Crucially, the efficacy of SCFA interventions is modulated by several contextual factors: (1) Baseline microbiota composition, where dysbiosis-induced depletion of SCFA producers (e.g., Faecalibacterium in IBD) may necessitate microbiota restoration prior to SCFA supplementation [166, 187]; (2) host disease status, as evidenced by divergent outcomes in early-stage diabetes (responsive) versus longstanding T1D (refractory) [14, 148]; (3) genetic predisposition, exemplified by polymorphisms in GPR41/43 or SLC5A8 transporters affecting ligand affinity and uptake [131, 141]; and (4) intervention modality, wherein colonic delivery (enemas/distal infusion) outperforms oral administration in UC therapy due to pH-dependent degradation and hepatic first-pass metabolism [13, 157, 179]. Precision profiling of these variables will be essential for patient stratification.

A critical innovation lies in the development of precision delivery systems tailored to optimize SCFA bioavailability and tissue specificity. Conventional oral supplementation or enema-based approaches often fail to achieve sustained luminal or systemic concentrations due to rapid metabolism or pH-dependent degradation. Advances in nanotechnology, such as pH-responsive nanoparticles, could enable targeted colonic release of SCFAs, enhancing local efficacy while minimizing off-target effects [190193]. Furthermore, engineered probiotics expressing butyrate-synthesizing enzymes or CRISPR-edited commensals may offer a sustainable, self-renewing source of SCFAs, bypassing dietary dependency [194196]. Such bioengineered platforms could synergize with dietary interventions to restore microbial niches in disordered conditions like IBD or CRC.

Another frontier involves integrating multiomics and machine learning to decode the “SCFA interactome.” While current studies predominantly focus on single pathways, SCFAs operate within a dynamic network of host genetics, microbial metabolism, and environmental factors. Systems biology approaches, combining metagenomics, metabolomics, and epigenomic profiling, could unravel context-specific SCFA interactions and predict patient-specific responses [197, 198]. For instance, artificial intelligence–driven models may identify microbiome signatures predictive of SCFA efficacy in autoimmune diseases or cancer immunotherapy, enabling personalized therapeutic regimens.

Moreover, the therapeutic potential of SCFA derivatives and analogs remains underexplored. Structural modifications, such as esterification or fluorination, could enhance receptor affinity or metabolic stability. For example, tributyrin, a butyrate prodrug, shows improved pharmacokinetics in preclinical models but requires optimization for human use [199, 200]. Similarly, dual-acting molecules combining SCFA moieties with existing drugs, like HDAC inhibitors, may yield synergistic effects in metabolic or oncological disorders.

Finally, large-scale longitudinal trials are imperative to validate SCFA-centric interventions across diverse populations. Current clinical data, often derived from small cohorts or short-term studies, lack the statistical power to account for microbiome heterogeneity or dietary confounders. Ultimately, bridging mechanistic insights with translational innovation, SCFA research can transition from bench to bedside, offering novel strategies to combat the global burden of chronic diseases.

Contributor Information

Fude Liu, Email: liufude101@163.com.

Jin Zhao, Email: zhj_special@163.com.

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no new data were created or analyzed in this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Author Contributions

Yueru Zhao and Jing Chen contributed equally to share the first authorship. Jin Zhao designed the research. Yueru Zhao and Jing Chen wrote the manuscript. Yunlong Qin, Jinguo Yuan, Zixian Yu, Rui Ma, Fude Liu, and Jin Zhao critically revised the manuscript. Yueru Zhao had responsibility for all parts of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript, and figures were created with BioRender.com.

Funding

This study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant no. 82470735.

References

  • 1.Deleu S., Machiels K., Raes J., Verbeke K., Vermeire S. Short Chain Fatty Acids and Its Producing Organisms: An Overlooked Therapy for IBD? EBioMedicine . 2021;66:p. 103293. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2021.103293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Canfora E. E., Meex R. C. R., Venema K., Blaak E. E. Gut Microbial Metabolites in Obesity, NAFLD and T2DM. Nature Reviews Endocrinology . 2019;15(5):261–273. doi: 10.1038/s41574-019-0156-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Zaky A., Glastras S. J., Wong M. Y. W., Pollock C. A., Saad S. The Role of the Gut Microbiome in Diabetes and Obesity-Related Kidney Disease. International Journal of Molecular Sciences . 2021;22(17):p. 9641. doi: 10.3390/ijms22179641. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Vernia F., Longo S., Stefanelli G., Viscido A., Latella G. Dietary Factors Modulating Colorectal Carcinogenesis. Nutrients . 2021;13(1):p. 143. doi: 10.3390/nu13010143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Wassenaar T. M., Juncos V. A., Zimmermann K. Interactions Between the Gut Microbiome, Lung Conditions, and Coronary Heart Disease and How Probiotics Affect These. International Journal of Molecular Sciences . 2021;22(18):p. 9700. doi: 10.3390/ijms22189700. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Zhao J., Ning X., Liu B., Dong R., Bai M., Sun S. Specific Alterations in Gut Microbiota in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease: An Updated Systematic Review. Renal Failure . 2021;43(1):102–112. doi: 10.1080/0886022x.2020.1864404. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kawabata C., Hirakawa Y., Inagi R., Nangaku M. Acetate Attenuates Kidney Fibrosis in an Oxidative Stress-Dependent Manner. Physiological Reports . 2023;11(14):p. e15774. doi: 10.14814/phy2.15774. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.van de Wouw M., Wang Y., Workentine M. L., et al. Associations Between the Gut Microbiota and Internalizing Behaviors in Preschool Children. Psychosomatic Medicine . 2022;84(2):159–169. doi: 10.1097/psy.0000000000001026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Martin C. R., Osadchiy V., Kalani A., Mayer E. A. The Brain-Gut-Microbiome Axis. Cellular and Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology . 2018;6(2):133–148. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmgh.2018.04.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Igudesman D., Crandell J., Corbin K. D., et al. Associations of Disordered Eating With the Intestinal Microbiota and Short-Chain Fatty Acids Among Young Adults With Type 1 Diabetes. Nutrition, Metabolism, and Cardiovascular Diseases . 2023;33(2):388–398. doi: 10.1016/j.numecd.2022.11.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Hou H., Chen D., Zhang K., et al. Gut Microbiota-Derived Short-Chain Fatty Acids and Colorectal Cancer: Ready for Clinical Translation? Cancer Letters . 2022;526:225–235. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2021.11.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Martin-Gallausiaux C., Marinelli L., Blottière H. M., Larraufie P., Lapaque N. SCFA: Mechanisms and Functional Importance in the Gut. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society . 2021;80(1):37–49. doi: 10.1017/s0029665120006916. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Breuer R. I., Soergel K. H., Lashner B. A., et al. Short Chain Fatty Acid Rectal Irrigation for Left-Sided Ulcerative Colitis: A Randomised, Placebo Controlled Trial. Gut . 1997;40(4):485–491. doi: 10.1136/gut.40.4.485. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.de Groot P. F., Nikolic T., Imangaliyev S., et al. Oral Butyrate Does Not Affect Innate Immunity and Islet Autoimmunity in Individuals With Longstanding Type 1 Diabetes: A Randomised Controlled Trial. Diabetologia . 2020;63(3):597–610. doi: 10.1007/s00125-019-05073-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Smith E. A., Macfarlane G. T. Dissimilatory Amino Acid Metabolism in Human Colonic Bacteria. Anaerobe . 1997;3(5):327–337. doi: 10.1006/anae.1997.0121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.den Besten G., van Eunen K., Groen A. K., Venema K., Reijngoud D. J., Bakker B. M. The Role of Short-Chain Fatty Acids in the Interplay Between Diet, Gut Microbiota, and Host Energy Metabolism. Journal of Lipid Research . 2013;54(9):2325–2340. doi: 10.1194/jlr.r036012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Louis P., Hold G. L., Flint H. J. The Gut Microbiota, Bacterial Metabolites and Colorectal Cancer. Nature Reviews Microbiology . 2014;12(10):661–672. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro3344. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Louis P., Flint H. J. Diversity, Metabolism and Microbial Ecology of Butyrate-Producing Bacteria From the Human Large Intestine. FEMS Microbiology Letters . 2009;294:1–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2009.01514.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Duncan S. H., Holtrop G., Lobley G. E., Calder A. G., Stewart C. S., Flint H. J. Contribution of Acetate to Butyrate Formation by Human Faecal Bacteria. British Journal of Nutrition . 2004;91(6):915–923. doi: 10.1079/bjn20041150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Louis P., Duncan S. H., McCrae S. I., Millar J., Jackson M. S., Flint H. J. Restricted Distribution of the Butyrate Kinase Pathway Among Butyrate-Producing Bacteria From the Human Colon. Journal of Bacteriology . 2004;186(7):2099–2106. doi: 10.1128/jb.186.7.2099-2106.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Anand S., Kaur H., Mande S. S. Comparative in Silico Analysis of Butyrate Production Pathways in Gut Commensals and Pathogens. Frontiers in Microbiology . 2016;7:p. 1945. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01945. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Reichardt N., Duncan S. H., Young P., et al. Phylogenetic Distribution of Three Pathways for Propionate Production Within the Human Gut Microbiota. The ISME Journal . 2014;8(6):1323–1335. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2014.14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Zarling E. J., Ruchim M. A. Protein Origin of the Volatile Fatty Acids Isobutyrate and Isovalerate in Human Stool. The Journal of Laboratory and Clinical Medicine . 1987;109(5):566–570. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Van den Abbeele P., Ghyselinck J., Marzorati M., et al. The Effect of Amino Acids on Production of SCFA and Bcfa by Members of the Porcine Colonic Microbiota. Microorganisms . 2022;10(4):p. 762. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10040762. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Neumann-Schaal M., Jahn D., Schmidt-Hohagen K. Metabolism the Difficile Way: The Key to the Success of the Pathogen Clostridioides Difficile. Frontiers in Microbiology . 2019;10:p. 219. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Yoshikawa S., Araoka R., Kajihara Y., Ito T., Miyamoto H., Kodama H. Valerate Production by Megasphaera Elsdenii Isolated From Pig Feces. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering . 2018;125(5):519–524. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiosc.2017.12.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Rios-Covian D., González S., Nogacka A. M., et al. An Overview on Fecal Branched Short-Chain Fatty Acids Along Human Life and as Related With Body Mass Index: Associated Dietary and Anthropometric Factors. Frontiers in Microbiology . 2020;11:p. 973. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.00973. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Aguirre M., Eck A., Koenen M. E., Savelkoul P. H., Budding A. E., Venema K. Diet Drives Quick Changes in the Metabolic Activity and Composition of Human Gut Microbiota in a Validated In Vitro Gut Model. Research in Microbiology . 2016;167(2):114–125. doi: 10.1016/j.resmic.2015.09.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Walker A. W., Duncan S. H., McWilliam Leitch E. C., Child M. W., Flint H. J. pH and Peptide Supply can Radically Alter Bacterial Populations and Short-Chain Fatty Acid Ratios Within Microbial Communities From the Human Colon. Applied and Environmental Microbiology . 2005;71(7):3692–3700. doi: 10.1128/aem.71.7.3692-3700.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Dostal A., Lacroix C., Bircher L., et al. Iron Modulates Butyrate Production by a Child Gut Microbiota In Vitro. mBio . 2015;6:p. e01453. doi: 10.1128/mbio.01453-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Fallingborg J. Intraluminal pH of the Human Gastrointestinal Tract. Danish Medical Bulletin . 1999;46(3):183–196. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Enerson B. E., Drewes L. R. Molecular Features, Regulation, and Function of Monocarboxylate Transporters: Implications for Drug Delivery. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences . 2003;92(8):1531–1544. doi: 10.1002/jps.10389. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Wong J. M., de Souza R., Kendall C. W., Emam A., Jenkins D. J. Colonic Health: Fermentation and Short Chain Fatty Acids. Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology . 2006;40(3):235–243. doi: 10.1097/00004836-200603000-00015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Sivaprakasam S., Bhutia Y. D., Yang S., Ganapathy V. Short-Chain Fatty Acid Transporters: Role in Colonic Homeostasis. Comprehensive Physiology . 2018;8(1):299–314. doi: 10.1002/j.2040-4603.2018.tb00009.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Srinivas S. R., Gopal E., Zhuang L., et al. Cloning and Functional Identification of slc5a12 as a Sodium-Coupled Low-Affinity Transporter for Monocarboxylates (SMCT2) Biochemical Journal . 2005;392(3):655–664. doi: 10.1042/bj20050927. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Wolever T. M., Josse R. G., Leiter L. A., Chiasson J. L. Time of Day and Glucose Tolerance Status Affect Serum Short-Chain Fatty Concentrations in Humans. Metabolism . 1997;46(7):805–811. doi: 10.1016/s0026-0495(97)90127-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.White C. A., Pone E. J., Lam T., et al. Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors Upregulate B Cell microRNAs That Silence AID and Blimp-1 Expression for Epigenetic Modulation of Antibody and Autoantibody Responses. The Journal of Immunology . 2014;193(12):5933–5950. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1401702. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Sanchez H. N., Moroney J. B., Gan H., et al. B Cell-Intrinsic Epigenetic Modulation of Antibody Responses by Dietary Fiber-Derived Short-Chain Fatty Acids. Nature Communications . 2020;11(1):p. 60. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-13603-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Coccia C., Bonomi F., Lo Cricchio A., et al. The Potential Role of Butyrate in the Pathogenesis and Treatment of Autoimmune Rheumatic Diseases. Biomedicines . 2024;12(8):p. 1760. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines12081760. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Wu W., Sun M., Chen F., et al. Microbiota Metabolite Short-Chain Fatty Acid Acetate Promotes Intestinal IgA Response to Microbiota Which is Mediated by GPR43. Mucosal Immunology . 2017;10(4):946–956. doi: 10.1038/mi.2016.114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Takeuchi T., Miyauchi E., Kanaya T., et al. Acetate Differentially Regulates IgA Reactivity to Commensal Bacteria. Nature . 2021;595(7868):560–564. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03727-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Yang W., Xiao Y., Huang X., et al. Microbiota Metabolite Short-Chain Fatty Acids Facilitate Mucosal Adjuvant Activity of Cholera Toxin Through GPR43. The Journal of Immunology . 2019;203(1):282–292. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1801068. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Kim M., Qie Y., Park J., Kim C. H. Gut Microbial Metabolites Fuel Host Antibody Responses. Cell Host & Microbe . 2016;20(2):202–214. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2016.07.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Xu L. Z., Yang L. T., Qiu S. Q., et al. Combination of Specific Allergen and Probiotics Induces Specific Regulatory B Cells and Enhances Specific Immunotherapy Effect on Allergic Rhinitis. Oncotarget . 2016;7(34):54360–54369. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.10946. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Liao H. Y., Tao L., Zhao J., et al. Clostridium butyricum in Combination With Specific Immunotherapy Converts Antigen-Specific B Cells to Regulatory B Cells in Asthmatic Patients. Scientific Reports . 2016;6(1):p. 20481. doi: 10.1038/srep20481. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Luu M., Krause F. F., Monning H., et al. Dissecting the Metabolic Signaling Pathways by Which Microbial Molecules Drive the Differentiation of Regulatory B Cells. Mucosal Immunology . 2025;18(1):66–75. doi: 10.1016/j.mucimm.2024.09.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Rosser E. C., Piper C. J. M., Matei D. E., et al. Microbiota-Derived Metabolites Suppress Arthritis by Amplifying Aryl-Hydrocarbon Receptor Activation in Regulatory B Cells. Cell Metabolism . 2020;31(4):837–851. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2020.03.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Park J., Kim M., Kang S. G., et al. Short-Chain Fatty Acids Induce Both Effector and Regulatory T Cells by Suppression of Histone Deacetylases and Regulation of the mTOR-S6K Pathway. Mucosal Immunology . 2015;8(1):80–93. doi: 10.1038/mi.2014.44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Furusawa Y., Obata Y., Fukuda S., et al. Commensal Microbe-Derived Butyrate Induces the Differentiation of Colonic Regulatory T Cells. Nature . 2013;504(7480):446–450. doi: 10.1038/nature12721. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Arpaia N., Campbell C., Fan X., et al. Metabolites Produced by Commensal Bacteria Promote Peripheral Regulatory T-Cell Generation. Nature . 2013;504(7480):451–455. doi: 10.1038/nature12726. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Martin-Gallausiaux C., Béguet-Crespel F., Marinelli L., et al. Butyrate Produced by Gut Commensal Bacteria Activates TGF-Beta1 Expression Through the Transcription Factor SP1 in Human Intestinal Epithelial Cells. Scientific Reports . 2018;8(1):p. 9742. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-28048-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Asarat M., Apostolopoulos V., Vasiljevic T., Donkor O. Short-Chain Fatty Acids Regulate Cytokines and Th17/Treg Cells in Human Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells in Vitro. Immunological Investigations . 2016;45(3):205–222. doi: 10.3109/08820139.2015.1122613. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Singh N., Gurav A., Sivaprakasam S., et al. Activation of Gpr109a, Receptor for Niacin and the Commensal Metabolite Butyrate, Suppresses Colonic Inflammation and Carcinogenesis. Immunity . 2014;40(1):128–139. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2013.12.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Luu M., Pautz S., Kohl V., et al. The Short-Chain Fatty Acid Pentanoate Suppresses Autoimmunity by Modulating the Metabolic-Epigenetic Crosstalk in Lymphocytes. Nature Communications . 2019;10(1):p. 760. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-08711-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Chen L., Sun M., Wu W., et al. Microbiota Metabolite Butyrate Differentially Regulates Th1 and Th17 Cells’ Differentiation and Function in Induction of Colitis. Inflammatory Bowel Diseases . 2019;25(9):1450–1461. doi: 10.1093/ibd/izz046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Sun M., Wu W., Chen L., et al. Microbiota-Derived Short-Chain Fatty Acids Promote Th1 Cell IL-10 Production to Maintain Intestinal Homeostasis. Nature Communications . 2018;9(1):p. 3555. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-05901-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Lin M. H., Chou F. C., Yeh L. T., et al. B lymphocyte-Induced Maturation Protein 1 (BLIMP-1) Attenuates Autoimmune Diabetes in NOD Mice by Suppressing Th1 and Th17 Cells. Diabetologia . 2013;56:136–146. doi: 10.1007/s00125-012-2722-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Yuan A., Yang H., Qi H., et al. IL-9 Antibody Injection Suppresses the Inflammation in Colitis Mice. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications . 2015;468(4):921–926. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2015.11.057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Vieira R. d. S., Castoldi A., Basso P. J., Hiyane M. I., Câmara N. O. S., Almeida R. R. Butyrate Attenuates Lung Inflammation by Negatively Modulating Th9 Cells. Frontiers in Immunology . 2019;10:p. 67. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.00067. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Trompette A., Gollwitzer E. S., Pattaroni C., et al. Dietary Fiber Confers Protection Against Flu by Shaping Ly6c(-) Patrolling Monocyte Hematopoiesis and CD8(+) T Cell Metabolism. Immunity . 2018;48(5):992–1005. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2018.04.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Cox M. A., Jackson J., Stanton M., et al. Short-Chain Fatty Acids Act as Antiinflammatory Mediators by Regulating Prostagland in E2 and Cytokines. World Journal of Gastroenterology . 2009;15(44):5549–5557. doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.5549. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Takayama K., García-Cardena G., Sukhova G. K., Comander J., Gimbrone M. A., Jr, Libby P. Prostaglandin E2 Suppresses Chemokine Production in Human Macrophages Through the EP4 Receptor. Journal of Biological Chemistry . 2002;277(46):44147–44154. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M204810200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Sastre B., del Pozo V. Role of PGE2 in Asthma and Nonasthmatic Eosinophilic Bronchitis. Mediators of Inflammation . 2012;2012:p. 645383. doi: 10.1155/2012/645383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Mirmonsef P., Zariffard M. R., Gilbert D., Makinde H., Landay A. L., Spear G. T. Short-Chain Fatty Acids Induce Pro-Inflammatory Cytokine Production Alone and in Combination With Toll-Like Receptor Ligands. American Journal of Reproductive Immunology . 2012;67(5):391–400. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0897.2011.01089.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Wu T., Li H., Su C., et al. Microbiota-Derived Short-Chain Fatty Acids Promote LAMTOR2-Mediated Immune Responses in Macrophages. mSystems . 2020;5(6):p. e00587. doi: 10.1128/msystems.00587-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Xie Q., Li Q., Fang H., Zhang R., Tang H., Chen L. Gut-Derived Short-Chain Fatty Acids and Macrophage Modulation: Exploring Therapeutic Potentials in Pulmonary Fungal Infections. Clinical Reviews in Allergy and Immunology . 2024;66(3):316–327. doi: 10.1007/s12016-024-08999-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Schulthess J., Pandey S., Capitani M., et al. The Short Chain Fatty Acid Butyrate Imprints an Antimicrobial Program in Macrophages. Immunity . 2019;50(2):432–445. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2018.12.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Shi G., Sun C., Gu W., et al. Free Fatty Acid Receptor 2, A Candidate Target for Type 1 Diabetes, Induces Cell Apoptosis Through ERK Signaling. Journal of Molecular Endocrinology . 2014;53(3):367–380. doi: 10.1530/jme-14-0065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Aguilar E. C., Leonel A. J., Teixeira L. G., et al. Butyrate Impairs Atherogenesis by Reducing Plaque Inflammation and Vulnerability and Decreasing NFκB Activation. Nutrition, Metabolism, and Cardiovascular Diseases . 2014;24(6):606–613. doi: 10.1016/j.numecd.2014.01.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Maa M. C., Chang M. Y., Hsieh M. Y., et al. Butyrate Reduced Lipopolysaccharide-Mediated Macrophage Migration by Suppression of Src Enhancement and Focal Adhesion Kinase Activity. The Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry . 2010;21(12):1186–1192. doi: 10.1016/j.jnutbio.2009.10.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Harb D., Bujold K., Febbraio M., Sirois M. G., Ong H., Marleau S. The Role of the Scavenger Receptor CD36 in Regulating Mononuclear Phagocyte Trafficking to Atherosclerotic Lesions and Vascular Inflammation. Cardiovascular Research . 2009;83(1):42–51. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvp081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Fernando M. R., Saxena A., Reyes J. L., McKay D. M. Butyrate Enhances Antibacterial Effects While Suppressing Other Features of Alternative Activation in IL-4-Induced Macrophages. American Journal of Physiology-Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology . 2016;310(10):G822–G831. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00440.2015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Lee C., Kim B. G., Kim J. H., Chun J., Im J. P., Kim J. S. Sodium Butyrate Inhibits the NF-kappa B Signaling Pathway and Histone Deacetylation, and Attenuates Experimental Colitis in an IL-10 Independent Manner. International Immunopharmacology . 2017;51:47–56. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2017.07.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Chang P. V., Hao L., Offermanns S., Medzhitov R. The Microbial Metabolite Butyrate Regulates Intestinal Macrophage Function via Histone Deacetylase Inhibition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA . 2014;111(6):2247–2252. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1322269111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Li M., van Esch B., Henricks P. A. J., Folkerts G., Garssen J. The Anti-Inflammatory Effects of Short Chain Fatty Acids on Lipopolysaccharide- or Tumor Necrosis Factor α-Stimulated Endothelial Cells via Activation of GPR41/43 and Inhibition of HDACs. Frontiers in Pharmacology . 2018;9:p. 533. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2018.00533. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Li M., van Esch B., Henricks P. A. J., Garssen J., Folkerts G. Time and Concentration Dependent Effects of Short Chain Fatty Acids on Lipopolysaccharide- or Tumor Necrosis Factor α-Induced Endothelial Activation. Frontiers in Pharmacology . 2018;9:p. 233. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2018.00233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Li M., van Esch B., Henricks P. A. J., Garssen J., Folkerts G. IL-33 is Involved in the Anti-Inflammatory Effects of Butyrate and Propionate on TNFα-Activated Endothelial Cells. International Journal of Molecular Sciences . 2021;22(5):p. 2447. doi: 10.3390/ijms22052447. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Hosseinkhani F., Heinken A., Thiele I., Lindenburg P. W., Harms A. C., Hankemeier T. The Contribution of Gut Bacterial Metabolites in the Human Immune Signaling Pathway of Non-Communicable Diseases. Gut Microbes . 2021;13:p. 1882927. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2021.1882927. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Nakkarach A., Foo H. L., Song A. A., Mutalib N. E. A., Nitisinprasert S., Withayagiat U. Anti-Cancer and Anti-Inflammatory Effects Elicited by Short Chain Fatty Acids Produced by Escherichia coli Isolated From Healthy Human Gut Microbiota. Microbial Cell Factories . 2021;20(1):p. 36. doi: 10.1186/s12934-020-01477-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Nathan C. Neutrophils and Immunity: Challenges and Opportunities. Nature Reviews Immunology . 2006;6(3):173–182. doi: 10.1038/nri1785. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Sina C., Gavrilova O., Förster M., et al. G Protein-Coupled Receptor 43 is Essential for Neutrophil Recruitment During Intestinal Inflammation. Journal of Immunology . 2009;183(11):7514–7522. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0900063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Shen S., Prame Kumar K., Wen S. W., et al. Deficiency of Dietary Fiber Modulates Gut Microbiota Composition, Neutrophil Recruitment and Worsens Experimental Colitis. Frontiers in Immunology . 2021;12:p. 619366. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.619366. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Kamp M. E., Shim R., Nicholls A. J., et al. G Protein-Coupled Receptor 43 Modulates Neutrophil Recruitment During Acute Inflammation. PLoS One . 2016;11(9):p. e0163750. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0163750. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Maslowski K. M., Vieira A. T., Ng A., et al. Regulation of Inflammatory Responses by Gut Microbiota and Chemoattractant Receptor GPR43. Nature . 2009;461(7268):1282–1286. doi: 10.1038/nature08530. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Vinolo M. A., Rodrigues H. G., Hatanaka E., Hebeda C. B., Farsky S., Curi R. Short-Chain Fatty Acids Stimulate the Migration of Neutrophils to Inflammatory Sites. Clinical Science . 2009;117(9):331–338. doi: 10.1042/cs20080642. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Vinolo M. A., Rodrigues H. G., Hatanaka E., Sato F. T., Sampaio S. C., Curi R. Suppressive Effect of short-chain Fatty Acids on Production of Proinflammatory Mediators by Neutrophils. The Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry . 2011;22(9):849–855. doi: 10.1016/j.jnutbio.2010.07.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Stehle H. W., Leblebicioglu B., Walters J. D. Short-Chain Carboxylic Acids Produced by Gram-Negative Anaerobic Bacteria can Accelerate or Delay Polymorphonuclear Leukocyte Apoptosis In Vitro. Journal of Periodontology . 2001;72(8):1059–1063. doi: 10.1902/jop.2001.72.8.1059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Aoyama M., Kotani J., Usami M. Butyrate and Propionate Induced Activated or Non-Activated Neutrophil Apoptosis via HDAC Inhibitor Activity But Without Activating GPR-41/GPR-43 Pathways. Nutrition . 2010;26(6):653–661. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2009.07.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Kostylina G., Simon D., Fey M. F., Yousefi S., Simon H. U. Neutrophil Apoptosis Mediated by Nicotinic Acid Receptors (GPR109A) Cell Death and Differentiation . 2008;15(1):134–142. doi: 10.1038/sj.cdd.4402238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Theiler A., Bärnthaler T., Platzer W., et al. Butyrate Ameliorates Allergic Airway Inflammation by Limiting Eosinophil Trafficking and Survival. The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology . 2019;144(3):764–776. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2019.05.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Al-Haddad S., Riddell R. H. The Role of Eosinophils in Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Gut . 2005;54(12):1674–1675. doi: 10.1136/gut.2005.072595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Acharya K. R., Ackerman S. J. Eosinophil Granule Proteins: Form and Function. Journal of Biological Chemistry . 2014;289(25):17406–17415. doi: 10.1074/jbc.r113.546218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Shi Y., Xu M., Pan S., et al. Induction of the Apoptosis, Degranulation and IL-13 Production of Human Basophils by Butyrate and Propionate via Suppression of Histone Deacetylation. Immunology . 2021;164(2):292–304. doi: 10.1111/imm.13370. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Liu Y., Liu J., Du M., et al. Short-Chain Fatty Acid-A Critical Interfering Factor for Allergic Diseases. Chemico-Biological Interactions . 2023;385:p. 110739. doi: 10.1016/j.cbi.2023.110739. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Tan J., McKenzie C., Vuillermin P. J., et al. Dietary Fiber and Bacterial SCFA Enhance Oral Tolerance and Protect Against Food Allergy Through Diverse Cellular Pathways. Cell Reports . 2016;15(12):2809–2824. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.05.047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Liu P., Zhang M., Liu T., et al. Avenanthramide Improves Colonic Damage Induced by Food Allergies in Mice Through Altering Gut Microbiota and Regulating Hsp70-NF-κB Signaling. Nutrients . 2023;15(4):p. 992. doi: 10.3390/nu15040992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Chen X., Yang S., Guo Z., Li B., Wang Z., Jiang L. Human Milk Oligosaccharides and Milk Fat Globule Membrane Reduce Allergic Reactions in Mice Through the Modulation of Gut Microbiota and Metabolic Functions. Food & Function . 2024;15(22):11252–11265. doi: 10.1039/d4fo03851g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Liang L., Liu L., Zhou W., et al. Gut Microbiota-Derived Butyrate Regulates Gut Mucus Barrier Repair by Activating the Macrophage/WNT/ERK Signaling Pathway. Clinical Science . 2022;136(4):291–307. doi: 10.1042/cs20210778. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Fang X., Liu H., Liu J., et al. Isobutyrate Confers Resistance to Inflammatory Bowel Disease Through Host-Microbiota Interactions in Pigs. Research (Washington, D.C.) . 2025;8:p. 0673. doi: 10.34133/research.0673. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Thio C. L., Chi P. Y., Lai A. C., Chang Y. J. Regulation of Type 2 Innate Lymphoid Cell-Dependent Airway Hyperreactivity by Butyrate. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology . 2018;142(6):1867–1883.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2018.02.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Zou W., Ma D., Sun F., et al. Maternal OM-85 Administration Alleviates Offspring Allergic Airway Inflammation by Downregulating IL-33/ILC2 Axis. Pediatric Allergy & Immunology: Official Publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology . 2025;36(2):p. e70044. doi: 10.1111/pai.70044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Hu J., Lin S., Zheng B., Cheung P. C. K. Short-Chain Fatty Acids in Control of Energy Metabolism. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition . 2018;58(8):1243–1249. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2016.1245650. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Bergman E. N. Energy Contributions of Volatile Fatty Acids From the Gastrointestinal Tract in Various Species. Physiological Reviews . 1990;70(2):567–590. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1990.70.2.567. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Schönfeld P., Wojtczak L. Short- and Medium-Chain Fatty Acids in Energy Metabolism: the Cellular Perspective. Journal of Lipid Research . 2016;57(6):943–954. doi: 10.1194/jlr.r067629. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Kaji I., Karaki S.-I., Kuwahara A. Short-Chain Fatty Acid Receptor and Its Contribution to Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Release. Digestion . 2014;89(1):31–36. doi: 10.1159/000356211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Tolhurst G., Heffron H., Lam Y. S., et al. Short-Chain Fatty Acids Stimulate Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Secretion via the G-Protein-Coupled Receptor FFAR2. Diabetes . 2012;61(2):364–371. doi: 10.2337/db11-1019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.De Vadder F., Kovatcheva-Datchary P., Goncalves D., et al. Microbiota-Generated Metabolites Promote Metabolic Benefits via Gut-Brain Neural Circuits. Cell . 2014;156(1-2):84–96. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.12.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Li Z., Yi C. X., Katiraei S., et al. Butyrate Reduces Appetite and Activates Brown Adipose Tissue via the Gut-Brain Neural Circuit. Gut . 2018;67(7):1269–1279. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-314050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Frost G., Sleeth M. L., Sahuri-Arisoylu M., et al. The Short-Chain Fatty Acid Acetate Reduces Appetite via a Central Homeostatic Mechanism. Nature Communications . 2014;5(1):p. 3611. doi: 10.1038/ncomms4611. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.den Besten G., Bleeker A., Gerding A., et al. Short-Chain Fatty Acids Protect Against High-Fat Diet-Induced Obesity via a PPARγ-Dependent Switch From Lipogenesis to Fat Oxidation. Diabetes . 2015;64(7):2398–2408. doi: 10.2337/db14-1213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Neis E. P., Dejong C. H., Rensen S. S. The Role of Microbial Amino Acid Metabolism in Host Metabolism. Nutrients . 2015;7(4):2930–2946. doi: 10.3390/nu7042930. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Sender R., Fuchs S., Milo R. Revised Estimates for the Number of Human and Bacteria Cells in the Body. PLoS Biology . 2016;14(8):p. e1002533. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002533. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Rigottier-Gois L. Dysbiosis in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: The Oxygen Hypothesis. The ISME Journal . 2013;7:1256–1261. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2013.80. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Winter S. E., Winter M. G., Xavier M. N., et al. Host-Derived Nitrate Boosts Growth of E. coli in the Inflamed Gut. Science . 2013;339(6120):708–711. doi: 10.1126/science.1232467. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Lupp C., Robertson M. L., Wickham M. E., et al. Host-Mediated Inflammation Disrupts the Intestinal Microbiota and Promotes the Overgrowth of Enterobacteriaceae. Cell Host & Microbe . 2007;2:119–129. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2007.06.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Enocksson A., Lundberg J., Weitzberg E., Norrby-Teglund A., Svenungsson B. Rectal Nitric Oxide Gas and Stool Cytokine Levels During the Course of Infectious Gastroenteritis. Clinical and Vaccine Immunology . 2004;11(2):250–254. doi: 10.1128/cdli.11.2.250-254.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Kerfeld C. A., Aussignargues C., Zarzycki J., Cai F., Sutter M. Bacterial Microcompartments. Nature Reviews Microbiology . 2018;16(5):277–290. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro.2018.10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Yoo W., Zieba J. K., Foegeding N. J., et al. High-Fat Diet-Induced Colonocyte Dysfunction Escalates Microbiota-Derived Trimethylamine N-Oxide. Science . 2021;373(6556):813–818. doi: 10.1126/science.aba3683. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Cani P. D. Gut Cell Metabolism Shapes the Microbiome. Science . 2017;357(6351):548–549. doi: 10.1126/science.aao2202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Byndloss M. X., Olsan E. E., Rivera-Chávez F., et al. Microbiota-Activated PPAR-γ Signaling Inhibits Dysbiotic Enterobacteriaceae Expansion. Science . 2017;357(6351):570–575. doi: 10.1126/science.aam9949. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Zeng H., Umar S., Rust B., Lazarova D., Bordonaro M. Secondary Bile Acids and Short Chain Fatty Acids in the Colon: A Focus on Colonic Microbiome, Cell Proliferation, Inflammation, and Cancer. International Journal of Molecular Sciences . 2019;20(5):p. 1214. doi: 10.3390/ijms20051214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Fang Y., Yan C., Zhao Q., et al. The Roles of Microbial Products in the Development of Colorectal Cancer: A Review. Bioengineered . 2021;12(1):720–735. doi: 10.1080/21655979.2021.1889109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Alvandi E., Wong W. K. M., Joglekar M. V., Spring K. J., Hardikar A. A. Short-Chain Fatty Acid Concentrations in the Incidence and Risk-Stratification of Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. BMC Medicine . 2022;20(1):p. 323. doi: 10.1186/s12916-022-02529-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Chen D., Jin D., Huang S., et al. Clostridium Butyricum, A Butyrate-Producing Probiotic, Inhibits Intestinal Tumor Development Through Modulating Wnt Signaling and Gut Microbiota. Cancer Letters . 2020;469:456–467. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2019.11.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Stoeva M. K., Garcia-So J., Justice N., et al. Butyrate-Producing Human Gut Symbiont, Clostridium Butyricum, and Its Role in Health and Disease. Gut Microbes . 2021;13:1907272–28. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2021.1907272. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Shah S. C., Itzkowitz S. H. Colorectal Cancer in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Mechanisms and Management. Gastroenterology . 2022;162(3):715–730. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2021.10.035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Schmitt M., Greten F. R. The Inflammatory Pathogenesis of Colorectal Cancer. Nature Reviews Immunology . 2021;21(10):653–667. doi: 10.1038/s41577-021-00534-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Dyson J. K., Rutter M. D. Colorectal Cancer in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: What is the Real Magnitude of the Risk? World Journal of Gastroenterology . 2012;18(29):3839–3848. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i29.3839. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Brackmann S., Andersen S. N., Aamodt G., et al. Relationship Between Clinical Parameters and the Colitis-Colorectal Cancer Interval in a Cohort of Patients With Colorectal Cancer in Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology . 2009;44(1):46–55. doi: 10.1080/00365520801977568. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Mowat C., Dhatt J., Bhatti I., Hamie A., Baker K. Short Chain Fatty Acids Prime Colorectal Cancer Cells to Activate Antitumor Immunity. Frontiers in Immunology . 2023;14:p. 1190810. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1190810. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Li H., Myeroff L., Smiraglia D., et al. SLC5A8, A Sodium Transporter, Is a Tumor Suppressor Gene Silenced by Methylation in Human Colon Aberrant Crypt Foci and Cancers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA . 2003;100(14):8412–8417. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1430846100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Gurav A., Sivaprakasam S., Bhutia Y. D., Boettger T., Singh N., Ganapathy V. Slc5a8, A Na+-Coupled High-Affinity Transporter for Short-Chain Fatty Acids, Is a Conditional Tumour Suppressor in Colon That Protects Against Colitis and Colon Cancer Under Low-Fibre Dietary Conditions. Biochemical Journal . 2015;469(2):267–278. doi: 10.1042/bj20150242. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Shao Y., Gao Z., Marks P. A., Jiang X. Apoptotic and Autophagic Cell Death Induced by Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA . 2004;101(52):18030–18035. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0408345102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Thangaraju M., Cresci G., Itagaki S., et al. Sodium-Coupled Transport of the Short Chain Fatty Acid Butyrate by SLC5A8 and Its Relevance to Colon Cancer. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery . 2008;12(10):1773–1782. doi: 10.1007/s11605-008-0573-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Bultman S. J. Molecular Pathways: Gene-Environment Interactions Regulating Dietary Fiber Induction of Proliferation and Apoptosis via Butyrate for Cancer Prevention. Clinical Cancer Research . 2014;20(4):799–803. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-13-2483. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Thangaraju M., Cresci G. A., Liu K., et al. GPR109A is a G-Protein-Coupled Receptor for the Bacterial Fermentation Product Butyrate and Functions as a Tumor Suppressor in Colon. Cancer Research . 2009;69(7):2826–2832. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-08-4466. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Tang Y., Chen Y., Jiang H., Robbins G. T., Nie D. G-Protein-Coupled Receptor for Short-Chain Fatty Acids Suppresses Colon Cancer. International Journal of Cancer . 2011;128(4):847–856. doi: 10.1002/ijc.25638. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Drogaris P., Villeneuve V., Pomiès C., et al. Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors Globally Enhance h3/h4 Tail Acetylation Without Affecting h3 Lysine 56 Acetylation. Scientific Reports . 2012;2(1):p. 220. doi: 10.1038/srep00220. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Ruijter A. J. M. D., Gennip A. H. V., Caron H. N., Kemp S., Kuilenburg A. B. P. V. Histone Deacetylases (HDACs): Characterization of the Classical HDAC Family. Biochemical Journal . 2003;370(3):737–749. doi: 10.1042/bj20021321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Hull E. E., Montgomery M. R., Leyva K. J. HDAC Inhibitors as Epigenetic Regulators of the Immune System: Impacts on Cancer Therapy and Inflammatory Diseases. BioMed Research International . 2016;2016:1–15. doi: 10.1155/2016/8797206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Kimura I., Ichimura A., Ohue-Kitano R., Igarashi M. Free Fatty Acid Receptors in Health and Disease. Physiological Reviews . 2020;100(1):171–210. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00041.2018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Le Poul E., Loison C., Struyf S., et al. Functional Characterization of Human Receptors for Short Chain Fatty Acids and Their Role in Polymorphonuclear Cell Activation. Journal of Biological Chemistry . 2003;278(28):25481–25489. doi: 10.1074/jbc.m301403200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Yang Y. M., Kuen D. S., Chung Y., Kurose H., Kim S. G. Gα(12/13) Signaling in Metabolic Diseases. Experimental & Molecular Medicine . 2020;52(6):896–910. doi: 10.1038/s12276-020-0454-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Ahmed K., Tunaru S., Offermanns S. GPR109A, GPR109B and GPR81, A Family of Hydroxy-Carboxylic Acid Receptors. Trends in Pharmacological Sciences . 2009;30(11):557–562. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2009.09.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145.Pluznick J. L., Protzko R. J., Gevorgyan H., et al. Olfactory Receptor Responding to Gut Microbiota-Derived Signals Plays a Role in Renin Secretion and Blood Pressure Regulation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA . 2013;110(11):4410–4415. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1215927110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146.Fleischer J., Bumbalo R., Bautze V., Strotmann J., Breer H. Expression of Odorant Receptor Olfr78 in Enteroendocrine Cells of the Colon. Cell and Tissue Research . 2015;361(3):697–710. doi: 10.1007/s00441-015-2165-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147.Igudesman D., Crandell J. L., Corbin K. D., et al. Associations of Dietary Intake With the Intestinal Microbiota and Short-Chain Fatty Acids Among Young Adults With Type 1 Diabetes and Overweight or Obesity. The Journal of Nutrition . 2023;153(4):1178–1188. doi: 10.1016/j.tjnut.2022.12.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148.Mariño E., Richards J. L., McLeod K. H., et al. Gut Microbial Metabolites Limit the Frequency of Autoimmune T Cells and Protect Against Type 1 Diabetes. Nature Immunology . 2017;18(5):552–562. doi: 10.1038/ni.3713. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149.Tonucci L. B., Olbrich Dos Santos K. M., Licursi de Oliveira L., Rocha Ribeiro S. M., Duarte Martino H. S. Clinical Application of Probiotics in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study. Clinical Nutrition . 2017;36(1):85–92. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2015.11.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150.Feng Y., Zhu J., Wang Q., et al. White Common Bean Extract Remodels the Gut Microbiota and Ameliorates Type 2 Diabetes and Its Complications: A Randomized Double-Blinded Placebo-Controlled Trial. Frontiers in Endocrinology . 2022;13:p. 999715. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.999715. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151.Zhao L., Zhang F., Ding X., et al. Gut Bacteria Selectively Promoted by Dietary Fibers Alleviate Type 2 Diabetes. Science . 2018;359(6380):1151–1156. doi: 10.1126/science.aao5774. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152.Costabile G., Vetrani C., Calabrese I., et al. High Amylose Wheat Bread at Breakfast Increases Plasma Propionate Concentrations and Reduces the Postprandial Insulin Response to the Following Meal in Overweight Adults. The Journal of Nutrition . 2023;153(1):131–137. doi: 10.1016/j.tjnut.2022.10.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153.Vitale M., Giacco R., Laiola M., et al. Acute and Chronic Improvement in Postprandial Glucose Metabolism by a Diet Resembling the Traditional Mediterranean Dietary Pattern: Can SCFAs Play a Role? Clinical Nutrition . 2021;40(2):428–437. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2020.05.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154.Medawar E., Beyer F., Thieleking R., et al. Prebiotic Diet Changes Neural Correlates of Food Decision-Making in Overweight Adults: A Randomised Controlled Within-Subject Cross-Over Trial. Gut . 2024;73(2):298–310. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2023-330365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155.Kamil R. Z., Murdiati A., Juffrie M., Rahayu E. S. Gut Microbiota Modulation of Moderate Undernutrition in Infants Through Gummy Lactobacillus plantarum Dad-13 Consumption: A Randomized Double-Blind Controlled Trial. Nutrients . 2022;14(5):p. 1049. doi: 10.3390/nu14051049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156.Chambers E. S., Viardot A., Psichas A., et al. Effects of Targeted Delivery of Propionate to the Human Colon on Appetite Regulation, Body Weight Maintenance and Adiposity in Overweight Adults. Gut . 2015;64(11):1744–1754. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-307913. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 157.van der Beek C. M., Canfora E. E., Lenaerts K., et al. Distal, Not Proximal, Colonic Acetate Infusions Promote Fat Oxidation and Improve Metabolic Markers in Overweight/Obese Men. Clinical Science . 2016;130(22):2073–2082. doi: 10.1042/cs20160263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 158.Canfora E. E., van der Beek C. M., Jocken J. W. E., et al. Colonic Infusions of Short-Chain Fatty Acid Mixtures Promote Energy Metabolism in Overweight/Obese Men: A Randomized Crossover Trial. Scientific Reports . 2017;7(1):p. 2360. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-02546-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 159.Coppola S., Nocerino R., Paparo L., et al. Therapeutic Effects of Butyrate on Pediatric Obesity: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Network Open . 2022;5(12):p. e2244912. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.44912. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 160.Tilves C., Yeh H. C., Maruthur N., et al. Increases in Circulating and Fecal Butyrate are Associated With Reduced Blood Pressure and Hypertension: Results From the SPIRIT Trial. Journal of the American Heart Association . 2022;11(13):p. e024763. doi: 10.1161/jaha.121.024763. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 161.Kaye D. M., Shihata W. A., Jama H. A., et al. Deficiency of Prebiotic Fiber and Insufficient Signaling Through Gut Metabolite-Sensing Receptors Leads to Cardiovascular Disease. Circulation . 2020;141(17):1393–1403. doi: 10.1161/circulationaha.119.043081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 162.Yan J., Pan Y., Shao W., et al. Beneficial Effect of the Short-Chain Fatty Acid Propionate on Vascular Calcification Through Intestinal Microbiota Remodelling. Microbiome . 2022;10(1):p. 195. doi: 10.1186/s40168-022-01390-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 163.Chen L., He F. J., Dong Y., et al. Modest Sodium Reduction Increases Circulating Short-Chain Fatty Acids in Untreated Hypertensives: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial. Hypertension . 2020;76(1):73–79. doi: 10.1161/hypertensionaha.120.14800. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 164.Sun M., Wu W., Liu Z., Cong Y. Microbiota Metabolite Short Chain Fatty Acids, GPCR, and Inflammatory Bowel Diseases. Journal of Gastroenterology . 2017;52:1–8. doi: 10.1007/s00535-016-1242-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 165.Ban Q. Y., Liu M., Ding N., et al. Nutraceuticals for the Treatment of IBD: Current Progress and Future Directions. Frontiers in Nutrition . 2022;9:p. 794169. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.794169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 166.Machiels K., Joossens M., Sabino J., et al. A Decrease of the Butyrate-Producing Species Roseburia Hominis and Faecalibacterium Prausnitzii Defines Dysbiosis in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis. Gut . 2014;63(8):1275–1283. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2013-304833. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 167.Patz J., Jacobsohn W. Z., Gottschalk-Sabag S., Zeides S., Braverman D. Z. Treatment of Refractory Distal Ulcerative Colitis With Short Chain Fatty Acid Enemas. American Journal of Gastroenterology . 1996;91(4):731–734. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 168.Vernia P., Marcheggiano A., Caprilli R., et al. Short-Chain Fatty Acid Topical Treatment in Distal Ulcerative Colitis. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics . 1995;9(3):309–313. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.1995.tb00386.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 169.Scheppach W., Sommer H., Kirchner T., et al. Effect of Butyrate Enemas on the Colonic Mucosa in Distal Ulcerative Colitis. Gastroenterology . 1992;103(1):51–56. doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(92)91094-k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 170.Vernia P., Annese V., Bresci G., et al. Topical Butyrate Improves Efficacy of 5-ASA in Refractory Distal Ulcerative Colitis: Results of a Multicentre Trial. European Journal of Clinical Investigation . 2003;33(3):244–248. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2362.2003.01130.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 171.Vernia P., Cittadini M., Caprilli R., Torsoli A. Topical Treatment of Refractory Distal Ulcerative Colitis With 5-ASA and Sodium Butyrate. Digestive Diseases and Sciences . 1995;40(2):305–307. doi: 10.1007/bf02065414. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 172.Steinhart A. H., Brzezinski A., Baker J. P. Treatment of Refractory Ulcerative Proctosigmoiditis With Butyrate Enemas. American Journal of Gastroenterology . 1994;89(2):179–183. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 173.Vernia P., Monteleone G., Grandinetti G., et al. Combined Oral Sodium Butyrate and Mesalazine Treatment Compared to Oral Mesalazine Alone in Ulcerative Colitis: Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Pilot Study. Digestive Diseases and Sciences . 2000;45(5):976–981. doi: 10.1023/a:1005537411244. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 174.Rees N. P., Shaheen W., Quince C., et al. Systematic Review of Donor and Recipient Predictive Biomarkers of Response to Faecal Microbiota Transplantation in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis. EBioMedicine . 2022;81:p. 104088. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2022.104088. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 175.Fuentes S., Rossen N. G., van der Spek M. J., et al. Microbial Shifts and Signatures of Long-Term Remission in Ulcerative Colitis After Faecal Microbiota Transplantation. The ISME Journal . 2017;11(8):1877–1889. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2017.44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 176.Wang C., Gu Y., Chu Q., et al. Gut Microbiota and Metabolites as Predictors of Biologics Response in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Comprehensive Systematic Review. Microbiological Research . 2024;282:p. 127660. doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2024.127660. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 177.Zhu Y., Xu Y., Wang X., et al. Probiotic Cocktail Alleviates Intestinal Inflammation Through Improving Gut Microbiota and Metabolites in Colitis Mice. Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology . 2022;12:p. 886061. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2022.886061. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 178.Firoozi D., Masoumi S. J., Mohammad-Kazem Hosseini Asl S., et al. Effects of Short-Chain Fatty Acid-Butyrate Supplementation on Expression of Circadian-Clock Genes, Sleep Quality, and Inflammation in Patients With Active Ulcerative Colitis: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial. Lipids in Health and Disease . 2024;23(1):p. 216. doi: 10.1186/s12944-024-02203-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 179.Pietrzak A., Banasiuk M., Szczepanik M., et al. Sodium Butyrate Effectiveness in Children and Adolescents With Newly Diagnosed Inflammatory Bowel Diseases-Randomized Placebo-Controlled Multicenter Trial. Nutrients . 2022;14(16):p. 3283. doi: 10.3390/nu14163283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 180.Facchin S., Vitulo N., Calgaro M., et al. Microbiota Changes Induced by Microencapsulated Sodium Butyrate in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Neuro-Gastroenterology and Motility . 2020;32(10):p. e13914. doi: 10.1111/nmo.13914. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 181.Fritsch J., Garces L., Quintero M. A., et al. Low-Fat, High-Fiber Diet Reduces Markers of Inflammation and Dysbiosis and Improves Quality of Life in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology . 2021;19(6):1189–1199. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2020.05.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 182.Lin Y., Lv Y., Mao Z., et al. Polysaccharides From Tetrastigma Hemsleyanum Diels et Gilg Ameliorated Inflammatory Bowel Disease by Rebuilding the Intestinal Mucosal Barrier and Inhibiting Inflammation Through the SCFA-GPR41/43 Signaling Pathway. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules . 2023;250:p. 126167. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.126167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 183.Seethaler B., Nguyen N. K., Basrai M., et al. Short-Chain Fatty Acids are Key Mediators of the Favorable Effects of the Mediterranean Diet on Intestinal Barrier Integrity: Data From the Randomized Controlled LIBRE Trial. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition . 2022;116(4):928–942. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqac175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 184.Pagliai G., Russo E., Niccolai E., et al. Influence of a 3-Month Low-Calorie Mediterranean Diet Compared to the Vegetarian Diet on Human Gut Microbiota and SCFA: The CARDIVEG Study. European Journal of Nutrition . 2020;59(5):2011–2024. doi: 10.1007/s00394-019-02050-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 185.Rees K., Takeda A., Martin N., et al. Mediterranean-Style Diet for the Primary and Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews . 2019;3:p. CD009825. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009825.pub3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 186.Becerra-Tomás N., Blanco Mejía S., Viguiliouk E., et al. Mediterranean Diet, Cardiovascular Disease and Mortality in Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies and Randomized Clinical Trials. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition . 2020;60(7):1207–1227. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2019.1565281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 187.Bishehsari F., Engen P. A., Preite N. Z., et al. Dietary Fiber Treatment Corrects the Composition of Gut Microbiota, Promotes SCFA Production, and Suppresses Colon Carcinogenesis. Genes . 2018;9(2):p. 102. doi: 10.3390/genes9020102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 188.Le Leu R. K., Winter J. M., Christophersen C. T., et al. Butyrylated Starch Intake can Prevent Red Meat-Induced O6-Methyl-2-Deoxyguanosine Adducts in Human Rectal Tissue: A Randomised Clinical Trial. British Journal of Nutrition . 2015;114(2):220–230. doi: 10.1017/s0007114515001750. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 189.Huang F., Li S., Chen W., et al. Postoperative Probiotics Administration Attenuates Gastrointestinal Complications and Gut Microbiota Dysbiosis Caused by Chemotherapy in Colorectal Cancer Patients. Nutrients . 2023;15(2):p. 356. doi: 10.3390/nu15020356. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 190.Garbati P., Picco C., Magrassi R., et al. Targeting the Gut: A Systematic Review of Specific Drug Nanocarriers. Pharmaceutics . 2024;16(3):p. 431. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics16030431. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 191.Zeeshan M., Ali H., Khan S., Khan S. A., Weigmann B. Advances in Orally-Delivered pH-Sensitive Nanocarrier Systems; An Optimistic Approach for the Treatment of Inflammatory Bowel Disease. International Journal of Pharmaceutics . 2019;558:201–214. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2018.12.074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 192.Karimi M., Eslami M., Sahandi-Zangabad P., et al. pH-Sensitive Stimulus-Responsive Nanocarriers for Targeted Delivery of Therapeutic Agents. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Nanomedicine and Nanobiotechnology . 2016;8(5):696–716. doi: 10.1002/wnan.1389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 193.Palanikumar L., Al-Hosani S., Kalmouni M., et al. pH-Responsive High Stability Polymeric Nanoparticles for Targeted Delivery of Anticancer Therapeutics. Communications Biology . 2020;3(1):p. 95. doi: 10.1038/s42003-020-0817-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 194.Clark R. L., Connors B. M., Stevenson D. M., et al. Design of Synthetic Human Gut Microbiome Assembly and Butyrate Production. Nature Communications . 2021;12(1):p. 3254. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-22938-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 195.Ali N., Vora C., Mathuria A., Kataria N., Mani I. Advances in CRISPR-Cas Systems for Gut Microbiome. Progress in Molecular Biology and Translational Science . 2024;208:59–81. doi: 10.1016/bs.pmbts.2024.07.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 196.Murali S. K., Mansell T. J. Next Generation Probiotics: Engineering Live Biotherapeutics. Biotechnology Advances . 2024;72:p. 108336. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2024.108336. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 197.Zhang Y., Thomas J. P., Korcsmaros T., Gul L. Integrating Multi-Omics to Unravel Host-Microbiome Interactions in Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Cell Reports Medicine . 2024;5(9):p. 101738. doi: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2024.101738. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 198.Gao X., Sun R., Jiao N., et al. Integrative Multi-Omics Deciphers the Spatial Characteristics of Host-Gut Microbiota Interactions in Crohn’s disease. Cell Reports Medicine . 2023;4(6):p. 101050. doi: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2023.101050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 199.Edelman M. J., Bauer K., Khanwani S., et al. Clinical and Pharmacologic Study of Tributyrin: An Oral Butyrate Prodrug. Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology . 2003;51(5):439–444. doi: 10.1007/s00280-003-0580-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 200.Heidor R., Ortega J. F., de Conti A., Ong T. P., Moreno F. S. Anticarcinogenic Actions of Tributyrin, A Butyric Acid Prodrug. Current Drug Targets . 2012;13(14):1720–1729. doi: 10.2174/138945012804545443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no new data were created or analyzed in this study.


Articles from Journal of Nutrition and Metabolism are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES