Skip to main content
ACG Case Reports Journal logoLink to ACG Case Reports Journal
. 2025 Aug 4;12(8):e01789. doi: 10.14309/crj.0000000000001789

Impact of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists on Whole-Gut Gastrointestinal Motility Using Wireless Motility Capsule: A Descriptive Single-Center Case Series

Michael Cymbal 1,, Zehra Naseem 1, Din Hoxha 1, Samita Garg 2
PMCID: PMC12321443  PMID: 40761333

ABSTRACT

This retrospective case series investigates the impact of GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) on whole-gut gastrointestinal motility using wireless motility capsule testing. We analyzed 10 patients on GLP-1RAs who underwent wireless motility capsule testing for constipation or gastroparesis to assess gastric, small bowel, and colonic transit times. Delayed gastric emptying time was observed in 80% of patients, whereas delayed whole-gut transit time was noted in 44% of patients. The 3 patients on semaglutide (1 mg) had the longest gastric emptying time, delayed whole-gut transit time, and were the only patients with delayed small bowel transit time. Although limited by retrospective observation, our findings are consistent with the effects of GLP-1RAs on gastric motility delay and suggest an impact on whole-gut motility. With the expanding use of GLP-1RAs, these findings underscore the need for prospective studies using emerging motility technologies to further characterize the motility effects both during treatment and after cessation, thereby guiding evidence-based clinical decision-making.

KEYWORDS: GLP-1 receptor agonists, gastrointestinal motility, wireless motility capsule, SmartPill

INTRODUCTION

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs), specifically exenatide, were initially approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2005 for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D).1 Over the past 2 decades, GLP-1RA use has grown exponentially for both T2D and obesity, and numerous studies have shown improvement in cardiovascular and kidney outcomes.28

GLP-1RA is primarily secreted from enteroendocrine L cells in the distal ileum and colon, with receptors throughout the gastrointestinal (GI) tract.2 Although secretion and receptor location are primarily in the GI tract, effects from GLP1-RAs are both peripheral and central. Centrally, effects work to regulate appetite, reduce hunger, and increase satiety.2 Peripherally, GLP-1RAs enhance glucose-dependent insulin release from beta-cells, inhibit paradoxical glucagon release from alpha cells, and delay gastric emptying.2

The effects on GI motility occur through the inhibition of myenteric neurons and a reduction in small bowel migrating motor complexes activity.9 Although there is an understanding of the mechanisms of delayed GI motility, the specific effects on gastric, small bowel, and colonic motility are not well-defined. One validated method for evaluating GI motility is the wireless motility capsule (WMC), a noninvasive ambulatory study in which a small, nondigestible capsule is swallowed and transmits data regarding luminal pressures, temperatures, and pH values to a receiver worn around the patient's waist.10,11 WMC allows for the assessment of key motility measures, including gastric emptying time (GET), small bowel transit time (SBTT), colon transit time (CTT), and whole-gut transit time (WGTT).10,11 Delayed motility is defined as GET ≥ 4-5 hours and severe delay >12 hours, SBTT ≥ 6 hours, CTT ≥ 59 hours, and delayed WGTT ≥ 73 hours.1012

Motility abnormalities have been demonstrated in patients with long-standing or poorly controlled diabetes.13 This study aimed to evaluate the effect of GLP-1RAs on gastric, small bowel, and colonic motility using WMC.

METHODS

We performed a single-center, retrospective review of patients 18 years or older who were receiving GLP-1RAs before and during the WMC study completion, from January 2018 to December 2023, at the Cleveland Clinic. Patients were identified through procedural codes and medication prescription history. Three reviewers performed an extensive chart review to exclude patients who stopped GLP-1RAs before the testing date, had prior bowel surgery or were taking scheduled laxatives or motility medications. We evaluated demographics, GLP-1RAs type, dosages, duration of therapy, testing indication, WMC parameters, and previous motility testing. Potential confounding factors were also assessed, including additional GI motility medications, hypothyroidism, neurological conditions, and duration and control of T2D.

RESULTS

Initially, 74 patients were identified through procedural codes and medication prescription histories, of which 10 patients, 7 male and 3 female, met the criteria for further evaluation based on exclusion and inclusion criteria. The mean age of the patients was 54.0 years, with a standard deviation (SD) of ±11.3 years, and an average body mass index of 33.8 ± 7.1 (Table 1). Semaglutide was the most prevalent GLP-1RA (n = 5), followed by dulaglutide (n = 4). The most common indication (n = 8) for the WMC study was for gastroparesis with a previous gastric emptying study, and 2 patients had chronic constipation.

Table 1.

Demographics of patients from the study

# Age Gender Race BMI at study T2D
(Y/N)
(HbA1c at study)
T2D Diagnosis Year (years before study) Hypothyroid (TSH) Opioid as needed
Y/N
1 50 Male White 30.3 Y-(6.2) 2017 (5) N/A N
2 49 Female Black 28.6 Y-(6.2) 2018 (4) N/A N
3 50 Female Black 26.7 N- (5.3) N/A N/A N
4 46 Female White 44.3 Y-(6.7) 2017 (4) N/A N
5 66 Female White 29.5 Y-(6.7) 1998 (23) N/A N
6 75 Male White 28.5 Y-(5.8) 2007 (16) Y- (2.2) N
7 44 Female White 35.0 Y-(6.4) 2021 (1) N/A Y
8 40 Female Multiracial 47.7 Y-(6.8) 2009 (13) N/A Y
9 54 Female White 31.6 Y-(6.5) 2022 (1) N/A N
10 66 Female White 36.2 Y- (6.3) 2007 (15) N/A N

BMI, body mass index; T2D, type 2 diabetes mellitus.

All patients who met criteria for further analysis were not on laxatives, and 2 were prescribed low-dose as-needed opiates that were held 1 week before the test date. Overall, 90% of the patients had T2D, 5 of whom were diagnosed < 5 years before the test date, and 4 were diagnosed > 10 years before. T2D was well-controlled at the time of the study, with a mean HbA1c of 6.4 ± 0.32%. None of the patients had the Parkinson disease, and 1 patient had well-controlled hypothyroidism (TSH 2.2 mIU/L). Nine patients completed previous gastric emptying scintigraphy (GES) testing, all of whom were taking GLP-1RAs at the time of GES.

The mean and median values for prescription durations before the study were as follows: the duration of GLP-1RA before the study was 782.6 ± 546.5 days (mean ± SD) and 742 days (median). Transit times in hours: minutes, GET 19:16 ± 13:55 (mean ± SD) and 21:01 (median); SBTT 6:28 ± 6:12 (mean ± SD) and 4:25 (median); CTT 45:11 ± 36:45 (mean ± SD) and 46:13 (median); and WGTT 70:56 ± 44:51 (mean ± SD) and 71:58 (median) (Table 2). Mean transit time for semaglutide (n = 4): GET 26:16, SBTT: 9:40, CTT 55:34, WGTT 91:45; dulaglutide (n = 4) GET 16:07, SBTT 3:48, CTT 43:41, WGTT 63:38.

Table 2.

Details of GLP-1 agonists, duration, and doses in relation to SmartPill motility study transit times

# Indication GLP-1 RA Dose (mg) at study Duration of GLP1-RA before study (days) GET (hr: min) ≥ 4-5 hours suggests delayed gastric emptying SBTT (hr: min) ≥ 6 hours suggests delayed transit CTT (hr: min) ≥ 59 hours suggests delayed colonic transit WGTT (hr: min) ≥ 73 hours suggests delayed transit Prior GES, % retained at 4 hours (GLP1-RA, Y/N)
1 Gastroparesis Dulaglutide 1.5 515 17:38 - SDT 4:36 21:13 43:27 12 (Y)
2 Gastroparesis Dulaglutide 1.5 1,376 4:34- D 3:01 97:14- D 104:49-D 45 (Y)
3 Gastroparesis Semaglutide 0.25 44 Pill retention N/A
4 Constipation Exenatide 2.0 904 3:44 4:25 9:47 17:57 18 (Y)
5 Gastroparesis Dulaglutide 1.5 742 21:01- SDT 3:43 9:32 34:17 39 (Y)
6 Gastroparesis Semaglutide 1.0 1811 25:01- SDT 22:48 -D 46:13 94:02 -D 79 (Y)
7 Gastroparesis Semaglutide 0.25 111 4:07- D 3:41 9:25 17:14 44 (Y)
8 Gastroparesis Semaglutide 1.0 248 25:59- SDT 6:01- D 103:26- D 136:27-D 15 (Y)
9 Constipation Semaglutide 1.0 415 49:56- SDT 6:09- D 63:10- D 119:16-D 90 (Y)
10 Gastroparesis Dulaglutide 4.5 922 21:23- SDT 3:50 46:44 71:58 76 (Y)

CTT, colon transit time; D, delayed; GET, gastric emptying time; SBTT, small bowel transit time; SDT, severe delayed time; WGTT, whole-gut transit time.

DISCUSSION

In this retrospective cohort, we found that 90% of patients using GLP-1RAs exhibited significant delays in GI motility on WMC testing. The most prevalent abnormality was delayed gastric emptying, affecting 80% of patients, followed by small bowel transit and colon transit delay in 33% of patients. Forty-four percent of patients demonstrated delayed WGTT. Importantly, delay in motility was observed even in patients with well-controlled T2D, suggesting the GLP-1RA-related dysmotility may be independent of glycemic control.

These results from WMC are consistent with delays in gastric scintigraphy which was abnormal in 8 of the 9 patients who received GES testing on GLP-1RAs. This aligns with data from the SUSTAIN 7 trial, which found semaglutide and dulaglutide were associated with high rates of GI adverse events (33% and 48%, respectively).14 Our analysis showed a stronger association of GET and WGTT delays in patients receiving semaglutide compared with dulaglutide at comparable doses.

In addition, the dose and duration of GLP-1RA also appear to be relevant. We found that 50% of the patients had recently increased their dose of GLP-1RA before the study, and 70% had been on GLP-1RAs for at least 1 year. All 7 patients receiving dulaglutide ≥ 1.5 mg (4) or semaglutide 1 mg (3) had delayed GET or WGTT and accounted for all 6 patients who had severe delayed GET, defined as greater than 12 hours.11 The 3 patients who received the increased dose of semaglutide (1 mg) all exhibited delayed WGTT and had the 3 longest GET measurements. They were the only patients who exhibited delayed SBTT, although in 2 patients, the delay was minimal. SBTT was less frequently affected overall compared with gastric and colon transit times. Interestingly, the fastest WGTT was observed in a patient on the lowest semaglutide dose (0.25 mg) and shortest treatment duration (111 days). The only patient receiving exenatide showed no identifiable motility delay. No patients in this study were treated with tirzepatide, which warrants further research in the future.

Despite the discontinuation of Smartpill WMC manufacturing in June 2023, our tertiary center maintained the largest Smartpill database in the United States, with continued use through the end of 2024. WMC offered comprehensive whole-gut motility data, which remain unmatched by current testing modalities (GES for gastric emptying, video capsule endoscopy for SBTT, and sitz marker studies for colonic transit), each with inherent limitations. This underscores the value of whole-gut assessment tools.

Emerging technologies such as MotiliCap, a next-generation whole-gut transit capsule, and its associated software, MotiliScan, recently received FDA clearance (May 27, 2025) and now offer a new avenue to evaluate GI transit.15 Other innovations, such as the Atmo Gas Capsule, pending FDA approval, may further advance the field.16 The clinical relevance of comprehensive motility assessment is increasingly important, given the growing prevalence of patients with symptomatic alterations in motility associated with GLP-1RAs and the rapidly increasing rate of their prescription.17

Despite limitations inherent in its retrospective design, this study provides valuable data showing the changes in whole-gut motility on GLP-1RAs. These findings underscore the need for prospective studies with emerging technologies evaluating whole-gut motility in patients using newer GLP analogs, incorporating testing both during GLP treatment and after cessation. Such studies would help inform both patients and healthcare providers about the GI risks associated with GLP-1RAs to guide symptom expectations, management, and informed clinical decision-making.

DISCLOSURES

Author contributions: M. Cymbal: drafting the article; Z. Naseem, D. Hoxha: critical revision of the manuscript; S. Garg: final approval of the manuscript and is the article guarantor.

Financial disclosure: None to report.

Informed consent was obtained for this case report.

ABBREVIATIONS:

BMI

body mass index

CTT

colon transit time

D

delyaed

FDA

Food and Drug Administration

GES

gastric emptying scintigraphy

GET

gastric emptying time

GI

gastrointestinal

GLP-1RAs

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists

HbA1c

hemoglobin A1c

SBTT

small bowel transit time

SD

standard deviation

SDT

severe delayed time

T2DM

type 2 diabetes mellitus

TSH

thyroid-stimulating hormone

WGTT

whole-gut transit time

WMC

wireless motility capsule

Contributor Information

Zehra Naseem, Email: naseemz@ccf.org.

Din Hoxha, Email: hoxhad@ccf.org.

Samita Garg, Email: gargs@ccf.org.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Nauck MA, Quast DR, Wefers J, Meier JJ. GLP-1 receptor agonists in the treatment of type 2 diabetes – state-of-the-art. Mol Metab. 2021;46:101102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Holst JJ. The physiology of glucagon-like peptide 1. Physiol Rev. 2007;87(4):1409–39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Marx N, Husain M, Lehrke M, Verma S, Sattar N. GLP-1 receptor agonists for the reduction of atherosclerotic cardiovascular risk in patients with type 2 diabetes. Circulation. 2022;146(24):1882–94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ussher JR, Drucker DJ. Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists: Cardiovascular benefits and mechanisms of action. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2023;20(7):463–74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Marso SP, Daniels GH, Brown-Frandsen K, et al. Liraglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(4):311–22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Marso SP, Bain SC, Consoli A, et al. Semaglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(19):1834–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kristensen SL, Rørth R, Jhund PS, et al. Cardiovascular, mortality, and kidney outcomes with GLP-1 receptor agonists in patients with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of cardiovascular outcome trials. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2019;7(10):776–85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Husain M, Birkenfeld AL, Donsmark M, et al. Oral semaglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(9):841–51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Halim MA, Degerblad M, Sundbom M, et al. Glucagon-like peptide-1 inhibits prandial gastrointestinal motility through myenteric neuronal mechanisms in humans. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2018;103(2):575–85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Diaz Tartera HO, Webb D‐L, Al‐Saffar AKh, et al. Validation of SmartPill ® wireless motility capsule for gastrointestinal transit time: Intra‐subject variability, software accuracy and comparison with video capsule endoscopy. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2017;29(10):1–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Lee AA, Rao S, Nguyen LA, et al. Validation of diagnostic and performance characteristics of the wireless motility capsule in patients with suspected gastroparesis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019;17(9):1770–9.e2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Rao SSC, Kuo B, McCallum RW, et al. Investigation of colonic and whole-gut transit with wireless motility capsule and radiopaque markers in constipation. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;7(5):537–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Garg S, Valencia S, Syed H, et al. Differences in gastrointestinal motility in adults with type 1 and type 2 diabetes using wireless motility capsule. Dig Dis Sci. 2025;70(6):2069–78. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Pratley RE, Aroda VR, Lingvay I, et al. Semaglutide versus dulaglutide once weekly in patients with type 2 diabetes (SUSTAIN 7): A randomised, open-label, phase 3b trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2018;6(4):275–86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.MotiliCap-AnX Robotics. AnX Robotics. 2025. Accessed June 6, 2025. https://www.anxrobotics.com/products/motilicap/ [Google Scholar]
  • 16.USA—Atmo Biosciences. Atmobiosciences.com. 2021. Accessed June 6, 2025. https://www.atmobiosciences.com/usa/
  • 17.Berning P, Adhikari R, Schroer AE, et al. Longitudinal analysis of obesity drug use and public awareness. JAMA Netw Open. 2025;8(1):e2457232. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from ACG Case Reports Journal are provided here courtesy of American College of Gastroenterology

RESOURCES