Skip to main content
Springer logoLink to Springer
. 2025 Aug 4;192(9):554. doi: 10.1007/s00604-025-07395-4

Development, fabrication, and applications of laser-induced graphene-based biosensors in food and dairy sectors

Muhammad Ikram 1, Prafulla Salunke 2, Arshid Numan 3, Mazhar Sher 1,
PMCID: PMC12321947  PMID: 40760054

Abstract

Laser-induced graphene (LIG) has emerged as a cutting-edge carbon material with a unique porous architecture and superior electrochemical properties. Owing to its promising potential to immobilize various biological analytes, LIG has gained intense interest in the development of next-generation biosensors. Direct laser scribing on natural or polymeric substrate materials produces LIG electrodes with tunable properties, offers controlled microstructures, ease surface modifications, and doping with suitable elements, making it promising for electroanalytical measurements. Furthermore, LIG technology stands out as being cost-effective and supports environmental sustainability and eco-conscious solutions. These diverse features open new frontiers, making it suitable for fundamental applications in diverse fields, particularly in the food and dairy industry, where rapid, on-site, and precise monitoring is vital. This review comprehensively discusses fabrications of LIG-based biosensors with a focus on various laser sources, substrate materials, and surface modifications. The core sensing mechanisms of LIG biosensors are thoroughly summarized which enable high sensitivity and selectivity. However, special attention is given to LIG biosensors’ applications in the food and dairy industry for the monitoring of food pathogens, food ingredients, food spoilage, biogenic amines, food additives, antibiotics, chemical contaminants, and pesticides. Finally, this review discusses the current challenges of LIG-based biosensors, such as reproducibility, stability, and integration into commercial industries, while offering a future outlook for potential applications. By highlighting recent advances and summarizing knowledge gaps, this review provides new insights into LIG-based sensors and their applications in the food and dairy industry to ensure food quality and safety.

Graphical Abstract

graphic file with name 604_2025_7395_Figa_HTML.jpg

Keywords: Laser-induced graphene, Biosensor fabrication, Sensing mechanism, Biosensors, Food and dairy

Introduction

Observing the food and dairy product status and their hygienic packaging are key elements to prevent food spoilage because it impacts around 600 million people worldwide and causes the death of approximately 420,000 people yearly [1, 2]. Hence, adequate food and dairy product monitoring is mandatory and requires particular prerequisites. In the era of biosensing, graphene-made sensors are promising contenders in the food and dairy industry. Owing to the unique properties of graphene, it is considered a highly foreseen biosensor for food and dairy products. In addition, current advancements in LIG-derived materials have effectively broadened their spectrum in various applications. The multifunctional LIG-based biosensor developments are noteworthy and enable the real-time monitoring of physiological biomarkers, nutrients, biogenic amines, microbial contaminations, pathogens, fouling biofilms, and antibiotic concentration for the assessment of food and dairy product quality [35]. The progress in the production of LIG-based sensors reflects their potential to address the challenges in the modern food and dairy industry [68].

Graphene has gained huge attention after its discovery and widely studied two-dimensional (2D) nanostructure with some promising and commercially available products. Its unique rheological, physical, and electrochemical attributes make it a suitable material for various applications, including energy storage, electrocatalysis, flexible electronics, and biosensors [912]. Graphene is just one atom sheet having sp2 electronic configurations of carbon atoms with a honeycomb lattice, sharing sigma bond (σ) in the plane, and pi (π) bond out of plane with neighboring atoms with about 1.42 Å interatomic distance [1315]. Graphene has a higher surface area-to-volume ratio (~ 2630 m2/g), higher conductivity (~ 10⁶ to 10⁷ S/m), carrier mobility, excellent mechanical attributes, greater stability, and good biocompatibility. These properties make graphene a promising and interesting candidate for electrochemical applications, including biosensing, energy storage, catalysis, electronic, environmental remediation, and other biomedical applications [1618].

In the literature, multiple graphene synthesis techniques have been reported, encompassing thermal decomposition, hydrothermal, precipitation, chemical vapor deposition, reduction, and mechanical exfoliation [19, 20]. However, these developing strategies have certain limitations, including high processing cost, high temperature, complex synthesis routes, expensive precursors and capping agents, and poor-quality graphene, which limits their commercial applications. To cope with these challenges, intensive efforts have been made to develop a chemical-free, cost-effective, environment-friendly, and low-temperature method to attain high-quality graphene and graphene-derived materials. Hence, for the commercial application of graphene, simple and cost-effective methods are still in high demand [2123].

Laser-induced graphene (LIG) was first reported by Lin et al. [24]. Their research presented laser scribing strategy in which laser irradiation transforms the polymeric substances into graphene by inducing photo-thermal and chemical conversion during the fabrication process; the resulting graphene is commonly known as laser-induced graphene (LIG) [24]. Laser-induced technology is extensively applied in designing multiple sensing materials and has succeeded in reducing graphene oxide into graphene. Laser irradiation is a simple and direct process to convert polymeric substances, including polyimide, polytetrafluoroethylene, and natural precursors encompassing food, wood, and lignin, into two-dimensional and three-dimensional graphene [2529]. The laser-induced graphene synthesis is cost-effective and environmentally friendly, in which carbon dioxide (CO2) infrared laser converts sp3 hybridized carbon (C) into sp2 hybridized carbon by photo-thermal or photo-chemical conversion, resulting in graphene having greater surface area to volume ratio, higher thermal stability as well as electronic conductivity [25, 30]. These attributes make LIG an interesting and promising material for biosensors. LIG has been extensively studied and applied in different sensors on electrochemical, piezo resistivity, and surface acoustic waves [3133]. LIG can be performed at ambient temperature by applying a laser directly to a precursor substance. This technology has advantages over the conventional methods applied in synthesizing graphene, including bottom-up approaches. Furthermore, LIG technology is facile and cost-effective with minimal e-waste and supports sustainable economic strategies, and can be applied directly for the printing of biosensor devices with desired patterns. Hence, the laser-induced graphene strategy is a cutting-edge technology and can be effectively applied to develop graphene-based biosensors [25, 3436].

Despite the growing interest in LIG-based electrochemical biosensors, their fundamental applications in the food and dairy industry still remain unexplored, with key gaps in the literature, food safety applications including the detection of food pathogens, contaminants, adulterants, and antibiotics. The current review provides a brief overview of LIG-based biosensors development and their applications in food and dairy products. We described comprehensively sensing mechanisms, fabrication processes, and materials, and elaborated on their current decade breakthrough for the real-time monitoring of food and dairy product quality. Finally, a short analysis of current challenges and future perspectives gives new insights for further ongoing research and the evolution of laser-induced graphene-based biosensors for realm assessment of food and dairy product quality. This review provides key insights into the potential of LIG biosensors to revolutionize the food and dairy industry by food safety monitoring through rapid, cost-effective, and on-site detection technologies.

Recently, several articles have been published presenting the innovations regarding LIG techniques and graphene-based sensors. For instance, Zhang et al. [37] summarized the work of electrochemical laser-induced graphene sensors for medical diagnosis, and Kumar et al. [38] studied how LIG could be synthesized and its sensing mechanism in the environment. Similarly, some other articles have summarized LIG-based biosensors for food safety applications. But all these research articles lack knowledge about the development of sensors based on laser-induced graphene applicable in the food and dairy industries. This review article presents an exclusive study on LIG biosensors, explaining laser parameters, chemistry of substrate, mode of sensing, modifications relating to surface, and use in real-world scenarios, presenting additional integration specific to the food industry perspective. The key contribution of this article is its focus on all previously identified gaps present in current research.

Fabrications of LIG-based biosensors

Graphene can be developed effectively by laser irradiation followed by patterned pathways under controlled conditions. The patterning and development of graphene are concurrently produced, in addition to traditional fabrication methods such as photolithography, which involves a complex formation encompassing several steps. Patterned LIG development under laser exposure is based on photothermal or photochemical effects. It is suggested that after infra-red laser irradiation, the bond as well as chain break occurred due to the photothermal effect. On the other hand, under UV laser irradiation, the development mechanism can be based on photochemical effects; photon energy and chemical bond energy are equivalent, leading towards the break of chemical bonds in organic substrates. However, it is also assumed that the photothermal effect can be involved in UV laser irradiation. Development of LIG under the exposure of visible light lasers is mainly based on both photothermal and photochemical effects [3942].

In the current decade, LIG has gained huge attention in graphene research. Hence, it is mandatory to comprehend the fabrication mechanisms of graphene to develop biosensor devices applied in food and dairy products. The fabrication process of graphene is based on the attributes of laser source and carbon precursors. Furthermore, the exposure time and wavelength of the laser pulse are also key elements. Mostly, laser produces a photo-thermal effect in which the precursor substance absorbs the photon energy and transforms it into thermal energy, resulting in high temperature and induced carbonization, graphitization as well, and exfoliation mechanisms to develop LIG. Furthermore, during this process, the production of gaseous products generates a high pressure that makes a vital contribution to the development of porous LIG structures. In addition, laser pulses for ultrashort duration can generate nonlinear interactions with precursor substances to develop a random pattern of graphene under appropriate conditions (Fig. 1) [4346]. CO2 lasers have been extensively used due to specific characteristics such as accessibility, ease of operation, and cost-effectiveness. It is mandatory to optimize the fabrication process considering the consistency and specific needs of application [47].

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

A Schematic illustration of effective substrates used in LIG fabrication. B SEM images of laser-derived graphene (LDG) at (a) 20 μm, (b) 1 μm, (c) cross-sectional SEM image, and (d) Raman spectra of fabricated LDG. C Shows (a) Laser scribed graphene fabrication by laser scribing, (b) Raman spectra of designed carbon nanosphere-laser scribed graphene at different laser powers, and (c) ID/IG and IG/I2D peak ratio of LDG. D Depicts a 3D demonstration of laser derived graphene (LDG) development by laser scribing on lignin/PVA film deposited on polyimide sheet and gold coating of fabricated LDG. Reproduced with permission under copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. [48]

Lasers for LIG biosensors fabrication

Various types of lasers with different features and wavelengths are being used in the development of LIG biosensors. These lasers include CO2 lasers, semiconductor diode lasers, fiber lasers, and neodymium doped yttrium garnet (Nd: YAG) Lasers. The mechanism of laser fabrication depends on laser wavelengths, exposure time, power, and scanning speed. The varying laser wavelength generates unique photothermal and photochemical effects, hence modulating the LIG sensor surface porosity, area, conductivity, and types of functional groups. On the other hand, laser operation modes encompassing continuous and pulsed lasers also have key impact on the LIG sensors development and properties. Continuous lasers are proposed for the fabrication of large surface areas, while pulsed lasers are proposed for smaller areas due to high energy density. The development of LIG sensors starts with the selection of suitable and carbon-rich substrates such as PI sheet, which is then subjected to laser treatment. The laser induction on substrate materials generates a photochemical or photothermal effect to convert sp3 carbon into sp2 carbon [4850]. Figure 2 shows the schematic illustration of the LIG biosensors fabrication.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

a LIG development by laser irradiation on a polymeric substrate. b Nd:YAG crystal laser for LIG fabrication. c Schematic illustration of semiconductor laser diode construction. d Femtosecond Yb-fiber laser system based on photonic crystal fibers for LIG fabrication. Adapted with permission from OPTICA under copyright CC BY 4.0 [51].

CO2 lasers

In the current era, infrared CO2 lasers are extensively applied to fabricate LIG-based biosensors. In comparison to previously reported continuous wave lasers, CO2 lasers have greater efficiency, including higher output power between 0.1 and 60 kW, enhanced energy in the range of 10–30%, excellent reliability, and lifetime. CO2 lasers have a low processing cost at the commercial scale among all available lasers, making them highly promising and applicable for industrial-scale production. Furthermore, the emission spectra of CO2 lasers have a 9–11 µm range, which is effectively absorbed by the C–C bonding in precursor substance. In addition, CO2 lasers have the potential to run in pulse mode besides continuous mode with varying repetition rates between a few Hz and more than 100 kHz, resulting in tunable and excellent attributes for the development of biosensors for various applications in food and dairy products. In LIG synthesis CO2 laser creates direct writing on the PI sheet, converting carbon atoms into graphene via thermal effect. The whole process is performed at ambient conditions without vacuum or inert gas environment. The LIG generated by this rapid method has higher scalability, is cost-effective, and is environmentally friendly. However, there are limitations of CO2 lasers, including low resolution of spatial patterns due to long-wavelength emission spectra, such as the minimum spot size having a range of 60–120 µm [47, 5254].

Neodymium doped yttrium garnet (Nd: YAG) lasers

To overcome abovementioned limitations, neodymium-doped yttrium garnet (Nd: YAG) solid-state lasers have been suggested to have an emission spectrum of 1064 nm. They have applied CO2 lasers to produce LIG-based biosensors. Their working principle is based on continuous as well as pulse modes. The YAG crystals have the capability to generate higher power density at the ultra-short duration of laser pulse exposure. In addition, the emitted light from the Nd: YAG laser source can penetrate through different optical fibers, enabling the formation of compact systems. Both continuous wave and pulsed mode Nd: YAG lasers have been effectively applied to fabricate LIG biosensors. However, the resistance was not up to par compared to CO2 lasers. Furthermore, Nd: YAG lasers have certain limitations, including lower power, inefficient beam quality, and poor energy efficiency, which limit their applications in LIG biosensors fabrications. To cope with these challenges, neodymium-doped yttrium orthovanadate (Nd: YVO4) lasers have been suggested as a replacement for Nd: YAG, accompanied by their greater energy efficiency, minimum heat production, excellent lifespans, and varying wavelengths. These attributes make them highly applicable and reliable laser sources for the fabrication of LIG derived from polymers and cork [55, 56].

Semiconductor diode-based lasers

For the replacement of CO2 and Nd: YAG lasers to overcome their limitations, semiconductor diode lasers have been reported to fabricate LIG-based biosensors. Diode lasers have certain advantages, including higher efficiency, greater reliability, cost-effectiveness, light weight, compact size, and varying wavelengths in the 405–3330 nm range. Furthermore, diode lasers have excellent electrochemical and tunable optical properties, resulting in greater power transform efficiency of up to 50%. In addition, diode lasers are commercially available with output power in the range of a few milliwatts to kilowatts. Hence, they are replacing other laser sources for multiple applications. The low-power diode lasers are more promising as compared to high-power diode lasers, because they have good beam and low beam quality, respectively. Diode lasers with wavelengths in the visible region are recommended for the fabrication of LIG-based biosensors. Diode lasers are cost-effective, enhance spatial resolution, and have greater absorption of precursor substances. These properties make them interesting and promising for LIG fabrications [5759].

Fiber lasers

In the current decade, fiber lasers have been widely used in the fabrication of LIG-based biosensors. Fiber lasers’ working mechanism is based on optical fibers modified with rare earth elements comprising erbium and ytterbium. Fiber lasers are highly efficient because the light generated from optical fibers has enhanced optical gain, accompanying effective pump-signal interaction, resulting in greater output power of about multi kilowatt. Furthermore, fiber lasers have excellent thermal management because of a higher surface area to volume ratio, enhanced stability, good beam quality, easy maintenance, and small size footprints [60, 61]. The ytterbium (Yb) modified fiber lasers have gained huge attention owing to their greater quantum efficiency of about 94%. In addition, Yb modified fiber lasers, having mode-locked, can generate ultra-short pulses of picoseconds or even femtoseconds. The femtosecond fiber lasers can produce a repetitive pulse in the range of 1020–1070 nm wavelength with a pulse repetition rate of a few tens to about hundreds of MHz. The power intensity of the pulse peak approached up to megawatts. The ultra-short pulse exposure time minimizes the heat to a greater extent in comparison to longer pulse duration or continuous wave mode lasers. The enhanced peak power intensity makes nonlinear absorption to transparent materials possible under particular laser wavelengths. Moreover, nonlinear absorption is confined to a particular area or volume to attain high-resolution patterning. Hence, fiber lasers have enhanced spatial resolution, potential for direct patterning, and reduced photo-thermal ablation properties, which make them versatile light sources for LIG-based biosensor fabrication [6264].

Materials for LIG biosensors fabrication

The performance and quality of LIG biosensors are dependent on the selection of substrate materials and laser parameters. A broad range of materials has been reported, including polymers and natural substances that can be used as carbonaceous predecessors. However, the use of renewable and recyclable substrate materials like green sources is highly recommended for LIG fabrication. These materials present a sustainable and environmentally friendly alternative to synthetic polymers. Besides substrate materials, the laser length, pulsing speed, control conditions, and chemical and structural composition of carbonaceous predecessors are major factors in predicting whether the desired carbon precursors can be transformed into LIG. A wide range of carbon materials have been suggested for LIG doping for the desired chemical and physical attributes enlisted in Table 1 [6568]. Table 1 presents fabrication approaches of LIG sensors, illustrating the variety of lasers, nature of substrate material, and the modification process. Scalability and cost-efficiency bring domination of CO2 lasers, whereas other types of lasers enhance spatial resolution. The influence of fabrication parameters on conductivity could be observed via sheet resistance.

Table 1.

LIG-based biosensor fabrications, materials, and laser types

Fabrication methods Laser type Fabrication/modification materials Substrate
materials
Sheet resistance Reference
Direct laser writing CO2 laser Copper nanocubes Polyimide 14.3 Ω cm−2 [69]
Direct laser writing X-660 laser cutter Aptamer Polyimide - [70]
Direct laser writing VLS 3.50 laser cutter PEDOT Polyimide - [71]
Direct laser writing CO2 laser Antibodies Polyimide 18.2 MΩ [72]
Laser engraving CO2 laser AuNPs Polyimide 0.47 ± 0.03 kΩ [73]
Laser scribing and inkjet printing CO2 laser Antibodies Polyester 90.6 ± 3.9 Ω/sq [74]
Direct laser writing CO2 laser - Cellulose paper 43.7 ± 2.3 Ω sq−1 [75]
Laser scribing CO2 laser Silicone Polyimide 10.96 Ω cm−2 [71]
Laser scribing CO2 laser PtAuNP Polyimide 43 Ω cm−2 [65]
Laser scribing VLS 3.50 laser cutter

Erichrome black T/amine/

PEDOT

Polyimide 102.4 ± 7.3 Ω cm−2 [71]
Laser scribing CO2 laser MIP/PPy Polyimide 58 Ω cm−2 [30]
Laser engraving CO2 laser Cu2+/ethyl-cellulose Polyimide 75.5 Ω [76]
Laser engraving Ultraviolet marking machine AgNPs Polyimide - [77]
Laser ablation CO2 laser AuNPs-pPy-chitosan Polyimide 35 ± 3 Ω [78]
Laser scribing CO2 laser nanoPd@LIG Polyimide - [79]
Laser engraving CO2 laser Tetraphenylporphyr-in/ZnO Polyimide - [80]
Laser ablation Fiber laser Cu-LIG/ITO Phenolic film 110 Ω, [81]
Direct laser writing CO2 laser Cellulose paper Polyimide 105 Ω sq−1 [82]
Direct laser writing CO2 laser - Cork 10.6 Ω sq−1 [83]
Direct imprinting Femtosecond laser - GO films 3.91 × 10−5 Ωm [84]
Direct laser writing CO2 laser PDMS-TEG PDMS 130 Ω sq−1 [85]
Direct laser writing Semiconductor laser PR-Fe coating Phenolic resin 44 Ω sq−1 [86]

Polymeric Materials

Polymers with aromatic structural compositions are widely used as carbonaceous substrates for the effective development of LIG. Upon laser exposure, the generated photothermal and photochemical phenomena rearranged the aromatic compound to develop a graphite structure [87]. The polymers, including polyimide (PI) containing phenyls, phenolic resins, and polysulfone, can be integrated into graphene due to similar structural chemistry (Fig. 3). The LIG can be easily developed from phenolic resin and will solubilize in organic solvents like ethanol and acetone. Hence, the obtained solution of phenolic resin having the desired viscosity can be easily formulated for diverse applications such as coating and doping phenolic resin. Polysulfone and polyphenylsulfone films are sulfur-enriched polymers, which can be used to develop sulfur-doped LIG films after treatment with a CO2 laser. The integration of sulfur into LIG creates more electroactive sites for promising electrochemical sensing applications [26, 88, 89]. In addition, 3D graphene can be developed by LIG printing based on the principle of laminated object manufacturing. However, due to limited energy absorption, various carbonaceous substrates cannot be transformed into LIG films in ambient conditions after single-pulse laser exposure. For example, non-aromatic polymers with lower absorption capability for laser energy are relatively converted into LIG in a more laborious way as compared to aromatic polymers. Polyether ether ketone and resin polymers are promising 3D materials and carbonaceous substrates for LIG development. Hence, incorporating 3D printing into LIG development was an interesting approach for developing intelligent sensing devices [90, 91]. The combination of the two strategies prospers in the manufacturing of 3D-printed sensing devices with self-monitoring characteristics. The developed LIG thin film is an active substance for the sensor design and can effectively self-monitor the deformation in real time, including stretching, bending, rotation, and abrasion. These designed sensors exhibited higher sensitivity, excellent response and recovery time, and promising reliability [92, 93].

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Schematic illustration of LIG fabrication. a Development of LIG on a polysulfone precursor material. b Image of LIG patterned on different polymer substrates. c Raman spectra of LIG developed using various polymeric materials. d PEEK components development via 3D printing. e Development of LIG on PEEK substrate. f SEM images of fabricated LIG on PEEK substrate. Reproduced with permission from American Chemical Society under copyright CC BY 4.0 [26]

Natural materials

In the current decade, green electronics have gained huge popularity and interest in research. Generally, green electronics development is based on natural materials and their desired derived materials. Among natural materials, wood is an abundant and favorable substrate and is highly recommended for developing LIG [94, 95]. A study was conducted by Ye et al. to design LIG by CO2 laser irradiation on pine wood in the control environment. The inert atmosphere was suitable to reduce the ablation of pine wood. Furthermore, the lignin in wood has a significant role in the high-quality production of LIG owing to its abundant carbon content and aromatic structural composition. Besides wood, there are some other natural materials reported in the development of LIG, including potato, coconut, cellulose, and cloth. These precursor substrates are highly suggested for LIG development by applying multiple lasing strategies [96, 97].

In another study, Le et al. developed LIG through the transformation of wood/leaf by UV laser exposure, which had high repetition and femtosecond pulsing speed. The femtosecond laser has a shorter pulse duration than thermal relaxation time, reducing thermal diffusion and minimizing substrate temperature. Furthermore, high repetition rate and laser energy restrict the heat into small areas by efficient light absorption. Hence, the femtosecond laser converts wood and leaves effectively into LIG by minimizing the ablation. In addition, femtosecond lasers are promising in developing LIG with high-resolution patterning. The transformation of wood and leaves into LIG is composed of two successive steps. Firstly, wood was carbonated into coke as an intermediate substrate by a thermal process generated by laser pulse repetition. Secondly, the intermediate substrate coke was transformed into LIG by graphitization along with an exfoliation process under the exposure of a very short laser pulse duration (Fig. 4) [98, 99].

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

a LIG development on wood substrate. b SEM images of fabricated LIG. c Raman spectra of designed LIG. d Image of LIG printed electronic circuit on the leaf for developing flexible and wearable plant sensor devices. e Schematic illustration of LIG patterning mechanism. Reproduced with permission under copyright© 2019 WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim [100]

Sensing mechanisms and operational modes of LIG biosensors

LIG-based sensors have different sensing mechanisms comprising capacitance, piezoresistive, piezoelectric, field-effect transistors, electrochemical, and chemiresistors to enable sensitive and selective detection of analytes. (Fig. 5). These sensing mechanisms explain the basic sensing principles of LIG-based different sensors [26, 101]. Electrochemical and resistive-based LIG sensors have high conductivity and porous nature to detect biomolecular interactions through changes in current, resistance, or capacitance. These sensing mechanisms are explained below exclusively. Electrochemical transduction is preferred due to fast response, miniature adaptability, and simple system, making it appropriate for onsite testing in food and dairy industries. But in case of complex food substrates, it may undergo interference. Capacitive and piezoresistive sensors present unlabeled detection with excellent mechanical response but are more likely to experience signal variations and environmental fluctuations. Field-effect transistors are restricted to signal amplification and real-time detection but are also restricted to microfabrication and surface optimization. While the simple and fast chemiresistive mechanisms also have limited selectivity, unable to differentiate isostructural food samples. That’s why, the chemical and physical nature of food samples, matrix intricacy, and optimal trade-off between reliability and sensitivity must be considered for the selection of sensing mechanisms [26, 102].

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Sensing mechanisms of LIG biosensors

Capacitive

A capacitive-LIG sensor is made of two conductive electrodes with a dielectric layer as an intermediate. Electrodes and dielectric layers predict the overall capacitance of developed sensors. Different complex structures are suggested for the dielectric layers, including pyramids, porous structures, and micropillar arrays, along with rough interfaces that have a key role in enhancing the sensitivity of sensors. However, the development of dielectric layer structures requires complicated processes. Hence, there is a great demand to develop methods that would be simple and cost-effective. Controlling the growth of microstructures is highly recommended to improve the sensitivity and response time of designed sensors. Furthermore, regulating the roughness of LIG electrodes can be used to enhance the sensitivity of capacitive-based biosensors [103106].

Piezoelectric

A piezoelectric effect based-LIG sensor works on the variation of dipoles among piezoelectric substances like polyvinylidene fluoride and zinc oxide under applied pressure, resulting in accumulating charge and formulating voltage on the surface of electrodes. Piezoelectric mechanism-based LIG sensors can transform mechanical energy into voltage signals, which facilitates the development of self-regulated sensor devices that are effective in wearable electronics and drug delivery systems. However, there are certain limitations, such as piezoelectric sensors having the capability to detect just dynamic pressure; hence, the piezoelectric substances only generate transient signals against external forces. The produced transient signal disappears soon, even in the presence of external forces [107, 108].

Piezoresistive

To overcome abovementioned limitations in piezoelectric-based sensors, piezoresistive sensors are suggested, which transform external stimuli into resistance variations. Piezoresistive-based LIG sensors are widely applied because of their simple structure, easy readout features, broad-spectrum detection range, and excellent durability. The sensing mechanism of LIG-based piezoresistive sensors is mainly based on the effect of sublattice symmetry breach under the influence of uniaxial strain leading toward bandgap opening of LIG and enhancing the resistance. Moreover, conductive materials fragment networks integrated by graphene and its derived products can interact with each other under exposure to applied strain and pressure. The assembled LIG network in the absence of external force indicates reversible variations in resistance. In piezoresistive sensors, the sensing mechanism works by recording variations in contact resistance generated by cross-sectional distortion when exposed to external pressure. Hence, developing a microstructural array of LIG materials is of key importance for improving the resistance of designed sensors. In addition, the synthesis of porous graphene structures is equally important to enhance the sensitivity and rheological features of LIG sensors based on piezoresistive mechanisms [109112].

Electrochemical

In the previous decades, graphene was extensively used in biosensors due to its fast and heterogeneous transfer of electrons, broad-spectrum potential range, minimum overpotential, and low residual current. These attributes made graphene an interesting and promising candidate in electrochemistry. To enhance the electrochemical sensing abilities of graphene, the surface can be functionalized by covalent and non-covalent binding of functional groups, including hydroxyl, carboxyl, etc. The covalent modification is suitable for designed graphene with particular strength and excellent stability. However, this process is time-consuming and sensitive to synthetic environments. In comparison, non-covalent modification can be obtained by intramolecular interactions like hydrophobic and hydrogen bonding. Graphene is considered an aromatic molecule, and substances with aromatic rings can be integrated into the surface of graphene. Furthermore, the combination of different functional groups is a commonly applied strategy to obtain high-performance LIG sensors [113116].

Chemiresistive

Various LIG sensors are based on chemiresistive sensing mechanisms for detecting biological and gas molecules. In this mechanism, charge transfer occurs among graphene and absorbed biological molecules that alter the carrier density and resistivity of graphene. Graphene has greater carrier density, mobility, and minimum intrinsic noise features, making it promising for sensing different biological and gas molecules. The detecting molecules can be considered dopants, and their tunable properties can regulate the resistance of graphene. The specificity and sensitivity of graphene can be optimized for effective sensing. The modification of graphene enhances the adsorption, sensitivity, and selectivity of detecting molecules [117120].

Field-effect transistor

Field-effect transistors (FETs) are extensively applied in different sensors, including biosensors, gas sensors, and chemical sensors. FETs-based sensors are promising due to their ability to amplify the detection signal, easy and simple configuration, cost-effective, and real-time sensing. FET-based sensors have four components: gate electrode, source and drain electrode, conducting active layer, and dielectric layer. Graphene can be applied as an electrode and active layer in FETs-based sensors. However, the zero bandgap of graphene seriously limits its usage in biosensors. To attain a tunable bandgap of graphene, convert it into nanometer scale such as graphene nanomaterials or quantum dots. In addition, chemical modification, like functional groups on reduced graphene, also opens up the bandgap of graphene [121125].

LIG-based biosensors modifications

The modification of LIG-based biosensors is a key parameter for their applications in food and dairy products. Tunable attributes of LIG fabrication with controlled morphology, surface area, rheological, electrochemical, and physical can be generated under different laser irradiations. Doping with heteroatoms during the fabrication process enhances the performance of LIG-based biosensors to a greater extent. Similarly, modification of LIG with appropriate materials results in hybrids and composites having promising functions. Furthermore, the tunable spatial resolution makes them applicable for various applications. Multiple approaches have been suggested to attain the desired attributes of LIG-based biosensors by altering the laser parameters or adjusting the reduction conditions [126128].

There are numerous approaches for LIG surface modifications, like doping of nanoparticles, antibody-based surface coating, and molecularly imprinted polymers. These methods enhance the selectivity and sensitivity of sensors, along with both pros and cons. Doping of nanoparticles like AuNPs and CuNPs also considerably raised the conductivity and electrocatalytic activity, but accumulation and instability have been observed due to recurring cycles. On the other hand, MIPs strategies, although lacking resilience in multiphase food matrices, are exceptional in selectivity because of molecular recognition strategies. Laser-induced graphene (LIG) functionalized with antibodies offers high specificity; however, its performance is limited by the susceptibility of antibodies to denaturation and reduced storage stability. To overcome these limitations, hybrid approaches—combining two or more sensing strategies with careful optimization—have shown promising potential for enhancing real-world applicability [5, 43].

The surface topography significantly impacts the surface area with active binding sites, surface attributes, and electrochemical activity of LIG-based biosensors. LIG surface morphologies can be optimized by adjusting the laser fluence and stacking density of the laser pulse. A particular fluence is suggested to enhance the carbonization process on the surface of the precursor substrate. Similarly, pulse stacking density is also a key element to attaining desired LIG surface morphology and structures. It is observed that greater stacking density of laser pulse generates sheet-like morphology, while lower stacking density of laser pulse produces fiber-type structure. Furthermore, continuous wave laser mode can be applied to create porous LIG structure with high strength, freestanding mode, and excellent electrical properties that make them effective in the development of biosensors [53, 126, 129].

The optimizations of surface attributes of LIG, particularly hydrophobic and hydrophilic properties, are key parameters and crucial for long-term applications of LIG-based sensors in food and dairy products. Conventional methods require different steps to design graphene materials with particular surface attributes and require chemical modification or surface coating in post-graphene modifications. LIG mostly showed hydrophilicity, and it can be optimized by carrying fabrication in gaseous atmospheres such as O2, air, argon, and helium. The LIG fabricated in different gaseous environments has different contact angles and affects the chemical properties of materials. Furthermore, the porous LIG structures also lead toward the super hydrophobicity of designed materials. The LIG microstructures with superhydrophobic properties are highly promising for electrochemical sensing due to enhanced interaction with analyte molecules, more binding sites, and increased defects to promote the transfer of free electrons [55, 130132].

The application of LIG biosensors is based on particular electrical conductivity demands. The electrical conductivity of LIG is tunable and can be optimized by controlling the fabrication attributes, including laser power, exposure time, and writing speed. It is observed that electrical conductivity is excellent without limitation of dimensions; hence, sheet resistance has promising measurements due to the film’s limited thickness. The sheet resistance of the LIG film was reduced by increasing the laser power at ambient conditions. Similarly, laser scanning speed has a greater impact on the sheet resistance of LIG film. The low scanning speed with prolonged exposure time increases the temperature of the substrate and generates microcracks in LIG film, resulting in lower electrical conductivity. On the other hand, high scanning speed produced the best sheet resistance due to the weak photothermal effect. Furthermore, the tunable parameters to control conductivity are not only based on laser power, exposure time, and scanning speed, but any attributes that impact the heat accumulation in the development of LIG can be considered to optimize for the desired sheet resistance of LIG film [92, 133, 134].

The long-term stability, precision, and selectivity of LIG biosensors are vital for their promising and real-world applications in the food and dairy industry. Stability of LIG electrodes is particularly affected by environmental exposure like temperature, humidity, and electrochemical cycling. The laser parameter, substrate materials, and suitable doping elements can improve the structural robustness of LIG electrodes. Similar to stability, selectivity is one of the major challenges in complex food matrices sensing, resulting in non-specific binding. To cope with these challenges, surface functionalization with antibodies, aptamers, and molecularly imprinted polymers is suggested to ensure selective binding with particular analytes. Development of LIG electrodes with durable performance for longer periods and specific binding in the presence of structural analogues remains an active research area [135].

The modification approaches of LIG-based biosensors are vital for enhancing electroanalytical performances, encompassing sensitivity, selectivity, durability, stability, and response time. Hence, surface modifications and functionalization with heteroatom doping elements, composite development, and optimization of laser attributes enable the real-world applications of LIG biosensors. Like, heteroatoms doping particularly enhances the electron transfer kinetics and increases binding sites, improving the electrocatalytic activity. On the other hand, metallic nanocomposite integration into LIG promotes conductivity. It makes it suitable for selective and sensitive monitoring of analytes, improving the sensor’s detection limit. Furthermore, the tuning of laser parameters such as scanning speed, laser wavelength, and exposure time directly influences the porosity, surface area, and surface morphology of LIG electrode and has a greater impact on the electroanalytical performance of sensors [136].

LIG biosensors applications in food and dairy industry

Graphene-derived biosensors have been studied for their application in the food and dairy industry. The increasing demand for sensing electronic devices has prompted the utilization of graphene and its derivatives as detection platforms for various food and dairy ingredients, toxins, microbial contaminants, and biological fluids [137]. Graphene has unique rheological and physicochemical properties and has emerged as a promising material in biosensor devices, particularly in food and dairy-associated applications. The graphene-based sensors have excellent sensitivity, selectivity, and precision in detecting traces of food ingredients and adulterants or contaminants [138, 139]. The modification of graphene to improve the adsorption of biomolecules is an excellent strategy for the sensitive detection of food analytes. The graphene modified with carboxyl functional groups generates a platform for immobilizing food molecules during sensing [92, 140]. In addition, the reduced graphene oxide modified with functional groups is excellent for attaching food molecules with promising conductivity. It proves its application in the sensing of food and dairy products [141, 142].

LIG-based biosensors have been utilized for various food and dairy industry applications. Various sensing strategies have distinct advantages and applications against different food and dairy industry analytes [143]. Electrochemical-based LIG sensors are most commonly used in this field due to ease of fabrication, simple miniaturization, good sensitivity and selectivity, and lower limit of detection for antibiotics, biogenic amines, and food contaminants [144, 145]. On the other hand, FET-based LIG sensors are effective for label free detection and high signal amplifications of analytes molecules. Meanwhile, chemiresistive sensors offers simple and fast response [146].

LIG sensors exhibit significant potential for food and dairy analysis, as they offer significant detection of a wide range of analytes such as pathogens, biogenic amines, additives, and antibiotic remains. Electrochemical platforms are highly preferred for their excellent sensitivity, simple and easy integration, but they show a decline in consistent performance in complex food matrices due to matrix interference and non-target interaction in real samples. While colorimetric and photoelectrochemical approaches usually provide simple visualization or signal enhancement, they mostly show a lack of sensitivity and limitations that are compulsory for the detection of trace contaminants. Although molecularly imprinted polymers and LIG sensors coated with antibodies reveal significant specificity and selectivity towards targeted samples, their life span, reliability, and reproducibility show limitations in real-world environments and field work. The emergence of wireless and wearable biosensors reflects a promising trend towards smart packaging and real-time detection of decaying food. Still, there are issues related to productivity at a larger scale; long-term stability is a concerning point and requires more enhancement, despite their versatility, adaptability, and promising potential for monitoring the safety of food. The successful commercialization of LIG-based biosensors needs more meticulous optimization and refinement of design, improving their performance [147].

A detailed overview of different graphene sensors in the food and dairy industry has been described briefly in Table 2, presenting designs of LIG-based sensors specific to nutrients, antibiotics, pathogens, and pollutants in dairy products and food. Biosensors have the capability of quick detection with low limits and specificity enhancement due to conjugation with antibodies or nanoparticles. This table also highlights the adaptability and high performance of LIG sensors for food analysis in the real world.

Table 2.

List of LIG-based biosensors for detecting various food and dairy analytes

Sensor configuration Analyte Sensing techniques Linear concentration range Limit of detection (LOD) Response time Fabrication Reference
Ru(bpy)32+ Cryptosporidium parvum Electrochemiluminescent - 3 pmol L−1 15 min Laser scribing on PI modified with Ru(bpy)32⁺-liposome complex and DNA [147]
LIG electrode functionalized with antibodies Salmonella enterica Electrochemical Immunosensor 25 to 105 CFU mL–1 13 ± 7 CFU mL–1 22 min LIG fabricated on PI functionalized with antibodies [8]
LIG integrated immunoassay strip Salmonella typhimurium Colorimetric 1 CFU/10 mL– 108 CFU/10 mL 1 ± 0.5 CFU/10 mL 12 min Laser scribing on PI and integration with gold nanoparticles [73]
Cu/LIG Glucose Electrochemical 0.005–0.525 mM 5 μM 2 s Laser-induced patterning and modification with Cu2+/ethyl-cellulose [76]
LIG chip Naringin Hesperidin Electrochemical 50 nM–100 μM

11 nM

15 nM

- Laser scribing on PI and used for CV measurements [148]
LIG/Ag electrode Formaldehyde Electrochemical 0.05–5 μg/mL 0.011 μg/mL 3 min Laser engraving on PI and electrodeposition of AgNPs [149]
(AuNPs)-polypyrrole-chitosan-LIG Vitamin C Electrochemical 0.25–5.00 mmol L−1 0.22 mmol L−1 2 min Laser ablation on PI and hybridization with AuNPs [78]
NanoPd@LIG Formaldehyde Electrochemical 0.01–4.00 mM 6.4 μM - PI integration with Pd2+ and chitosan followed by laser induction [79]
Cu-LIG/ITO Vanillin Electrochemical 0.25–40 μg/mL 0.14 μg/mL 4 min LIG integrated with Cu and deposited on ITO electrode via laser ablation [81]
Cu-plated LSG Biogenic amines Electrochemical 19.24 ± 8.21 mg histamine/kg 11.6 µM 7.3 s Laser scribing on PI and deposition of Cu functionalized with diamine oxidase [150]
LIG ion-selective electrode Nitrite Electrochemical 10−5–10−1 M 0.3 ± 0.1 mg L−1 3 min Laser engraving on PI and modified with PVC based nitrite [151]
LIG-based MIP sensor Tetracycline Electrochemical 10–300 nM 0.85 nM - Laser scribing on PI and MIP with phenylenediamine monomer and tetracycline template [2]
AuNSs/LIPG Sulfonamide Electrochemical 0.4–100 μM 0.035 μM - Laser direct writing on PI, decorated with gold nanoshells [152]
AuNPs/LIG electrode Tigecycline Electrochemical 0.01 to 800 nM 0.003 nM 3 min Laser engraving on PI functionalized with AuNPs and MIP layer of phenylenediamine [153]
h-BN/LIPG Sulfonamides Electrochemical 0.5–362.5 µM 0.011 µM 4 min LIG electrode engraving deposited with 2D h-BN nanosheets [154]
LIG/PbS/CdS Ampicillin Photoelectrochemical (PEC) 5.0–2 × 104 pM 1.36 pM 6 min LIG electrode decorated with PbS/CdS and CoOOH nanosheets, via laser [155]
Ag-La(OH)3@Dy2O3 Bisphenol A Tartrazine Electrochemical - 9.2 nM 0.96 nM -

Ag-La(OH)3@Dy2O3

nanocomposite integrated with LIG through laser ablation on PI

[156]
Au/LIG electrode Organophosphorus Electrochemical 3–400 ng/mL 1.2 ng/mL 3 min LIG electrode deposited with AuNPs via electrodeposition [157]
Pt/LIG Glyphosate Electrochemical 10–260 µm 0.991 nA µm−1 4 min Laser engraving on PI and deposition of Pt nanoparticles [158]

Pathogens detection

Food-borne diseases are a growing concern among food and dairy product consumers, with increasing numbers of cases every year. Hence, developing fast, cost-effective, simple, and sensitive approaches for on-site pathogen detection to combat problems is highly recommended. Laser-induced graphene sensors have great potential for pathogens at low limits of detection in food and dairy products [159]. LIG electrodes are integrated into microfluidic channels to investigate different detection approaches, including electrochemical and electro chemiluminescent. These strategies are simple, cost-effective, and mandatory for the development of assays in point-of-care sensing devices [160, 161].

A study was conducted by Gerstl et al. [147] to develop an LIG sensor based on electrochemical and electro chemiluminescent sensing mechanisms for the detection of pathogens. He investigated electrode design, dimension of the microfluidic channel and assay based on DNA hybridization along with liposomes for signal enhancement. The developed sensor was used to detect the DNA of the pathogen Cryptosporidium parvum. Liposomes entangled Ru(bpy)32+ to generate electro chemiluminescent signal or K4[Fe(CN)6] for electrochemical detection. The designed microchip has promising analytical features for sensing applications. It has a low detection limit of about 3 pmol L−1 for electro chemiluminescent sensing and 47 pmol L−1 for electrochemical sensing. The developed sensor was highly specific toward the targeted DNA analyte. This strategy was successfully applied for the on-site detection of pathogens [147].

In another study, Soares et al. [8] designed LIG electrochemical immunosensors to detect the pathogen Salmonella enterica in food samples. He fabricated a label-free and sensitive LIG electrode functionalized with particular antibodies to detect the food pathogen Salmonella enterica electrochemically. The LIG electrodes were developed through laser induction in an ambient environment. After LIG functionalization with specific Salmonella antibodies, the designed sensors sense the live Salmonella in chicken broth. This sensor has a low limit of detection of about 13 ± 7 CFU mL–1, along with a wide linear range of 25 to 105 CFU mL–1. It had a response time of 22 min and required no sample preconcentration. Furthermore, the developed LIG immunosensor exhibited higher selectivity by showing no significant response to related bacterial strains (Fig. 6). Hence, the developed LIG sensor can be used effectively for rapid, label-free, and cost-effective detection of pathogens in food and dairy products [8].

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

Fabrication, functionalization, and sensing mechanism of LIG biosensor. a Development of LIG on polyimide sheet (PI). b LIG working electrode. c Passivation of LIG electrode with lacquer. d SEM image of fabricated LIG electrode. e Immobilization of Salmonella antibody on the surface of LIG electrode. f Attachment of salmonella to the modified LIG electrode and electrochemical sensing Nyquist plot. Reproduced with permission from American Chemical Society under copyright CC BY 4.0 [8]

Preechakasedkit et al. [73] developed a colorimetric and electrochemical methods based on an LIG integrated immunoassay strip for the effective sensing of Salmonella typhimurium. In this study, the LIG electrode was produced by laser induction on polyimide film with a pseudo silver/AgCl reference electrode from silver sintering and chlorination. Automatic reagent supply was achieved for dual mode reading with single sample loading. For colorimetric signals, the gold nanostructures deposited approach was used to enable early screening and electrochemical response for higher sensitivity and quantification. The designed biosensor chip has an excellent performance, indicated by rapid analysis (12-min assay), wide spectrum working concentrations in the range of 1 CFU/10 mL–108 CFU/10 mL, and a lower limit of detection of about 1 ± 0.5 CFU/10 mL (Fig. 7a). This sensor strip was successfully used in the detection of different food pathogens without bacterial amplification, and the obtained results were in good agreement with standard culture test [73].

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7

a Pictorial representation of Salmonella sensing by colorimetric and electrochemical method via LIG integrated immunoassay strip. Reproduced with permission from American Chemical Society under copyright CC BY 4.0 [73]. b Graphical explanation of E. coli sensing by laser-reduced graphene oxide modified electrode. Reproduced with permission from American Chemical Society under copyright CC BY 4.0 [74]. c Detection of Pseudomonas aeruginosa culture on LIG. c-i) SWV graph of PA14. c-ii) PA14amp represents the peak after 22 h of testing. c-iii) Metabolic activity assay of E. coli on resazurin. SWV graph for live E.coli culture. c-iv) Normalized current graph for E.coli live and heat-killed. Error bars indicate the standard deviation. c-v) The OD600 value of E.coli culture having no resazurin, and error bars show standard deviation. Reproduced from Elsevier under copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. [75]

Zhao et al. [74] developed a laser-reduced graphene oxide electrode for sensing food pathogen E. coli. In this study, he produced reduced graphene oxide-modified electrodes using a simple, cost-effective, and fast method by applying direct writing encompassing laser scribing and inkjet printing coupled with a stamp-transferring strategy. In this approach, graphene oxide was reduced and patterned when exposed to the laser, followed by press-stamping to a polyester sheet. The fabricated electrode was studied using different characteristic techniques, including SEM, XPS, Raman spectroscopy, and electrochemical sensing. The designed sensor was used for the electrochemical sensing of E. coli. This sensor has a wide concentration range of 917–2.1 × 107 CFU/mL with 283 CFU/mL and a low limit of detection (LOD) (Fig. 7b). The sensor was coupled with a smartphone through a portable wireless system. Hence, the developed biosensor can be used for real-time detection of pathogenic food bacteria [74].

Another study was conducted by Butler et al. [75] to develop cellulose-derived LIG devices for monitoring bacterial contaminants by their metabolites. In this study, cellulose-derived LIG thin film with a resistance of 43.7 ± 2.3 Ω sq−1 was developed and used in electrochemical paper-based sensors. In the first step, time depended on the detection of pyocyanin excreted by Pseudomonas aeruginosa from planktonic culture and grown on an LIG paper-based chip was conducted. Remarkable variations were observed in the production of phenazine from bacterial cells cultured on LIG chips compared to planktonic culture. In the second step, E. coli cell viability and metabolic activity were studied by applying an electrochemical assay based on resazurin (Fig. 7c). This study demonstrated the application of cellulose-derived LIG sensors for the sensitive and effective monitoring of bacterial strains and provided new insight for the testing of food and dairy products’ pathogenic microbial species [75]. Kumari et al. designed a smartphone-based electrochemical sensor fabricated with a nanoflower for rapid, on-site, and sensitive quantification of hydrogen peroxide in milk samples. This was a novel approach used for the non-enzymatic sensing of hydrogen peroxide in food samples [162].

Food ingredients

The sensitive sensing of functional ingredients in food and dairy products is important in the modern food and dairy industry. Rapid determination of food nutrients, including vitamins, flavonoids, protein, carbohydrates, formaldehyde, and mineral salts, is crucial for nutrition uptake and health care. The excessive consumption of any ingredients leads to severe health problems such as obesity, cancer, metabolic disorders, diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases[163, 164]. Hence, the precise monitoring of food ingredients is mandatory to prevent health issues and facilitate healthcare management. Recently, laser-induced graphene has garnered huge attention in food ingredients sensing owing to its physicochemical and rheological properties [126, 165, 166].

Zhang et al. [76] designed a laser-induced copper-incorporated graphene sensor for non-enzymatic sensing of glucose molecules in beverages. During this study, an integrated LIG electrode was fabricated for rapid sensing of glucose molecules by direct laser patterning on Cu2+/ethyl-cellulose/polyimide sheet. The results indicated that the Cu/LIG fabricated electrode showed lower resistance for charge transfer and particular diffusion mechanisms. The improvement in resistance can be attributed to optimize LIG fabrication, resulting in the embedding of ethyl cellulose (EC) and copper chloride (CuCl2) as combustion substrates. The designed Cu/LIG electrode depicted promising electrochemical activity for glucose sensing with a limit of detection of about 5 μM, a response time of around 2.0 s, and a wide concentration range of 0.005–0.525 mM. In addition, the fabricated sensor showed higher selectivity, sensitivity, and stability (Fig. 8). This sensor was successfully applied to detect glucose in different beverages, including Cola, Sprite, Soda-Water, and Black Tea, manifesting their potential applications in the food and dairy industry [76].

Fig. 8.

Fig. 8

A Schematic illustration of Cu/LIG fabrication through spin coating followed by laser induction on the substrate membrane. B Glucose oxidation mechanism during catalysis under heating. C Glucose oxidation in the electrochemical sensing system. Reproduced from Elsevier under copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. [76]

Another study was conducted by Xia et al. [148] for the development of LIG chips for the effective sensing of bioflavonoids in fruits. In this study, a chip was designed by LIG at a polyimide sheet for the simultaneous and rapid sensing of bioflavonoids present in citrus fruits. During this study, the impacts of laser power on surface morphology and electrochemical properties of LIG were observed. In addition, at the LIG electrode, electrochemical sensing of naringin and hesperidin, along with kinetic analysis, was investigated to comprehend the detail sensing mechanism. Finally, a LIG chip was fabricated for rapid sensing of naringin and hesperidin. The designed LIG chip indicated a promising low limit of detection (11 nM for naringin and 15 nM for hesperidin), wide concentration range (50 nM–100 μM), higher selectivity, and good reproducibility. Moreover, the designed sensor chip was successfully applied for flavonoid detection in a real sample of citrus grandis with excellent reliability as well as validity (Fig. 9) [148].

Fig. 9.

Fig. 9

Sensing of naringin and hesperidin in citrus fruit. A Linear sweep voltammetry (LSV) of LIG-based electrochemical chip in PBS buffer at different concentrations of naringin and hesperidin. B Current values against the concentration of naringin and hesperidin. C and D Show the association between the monitored and added load of bioflavonoids. Reproduced from Elsevier under copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. [148]

Chen et al. [149] designed a LIG-coated Ag nanoparticle electrode for the sensing of formaldehyde. In this study, a novel sensor made of an LIG electrode was fabricated using a laser induction method. The precursor substrate polyimide was optimized by a metal ion exchange approach, and the working electrode was deposited with graphene/Ag nanoparticles. The structural characteristics of the LIG-coated Ag electrode indicated a higher surface area, hence providing more binding sites for electrochemical sensing of formaldehyde. In addition, the differential pulse voltammetry (DPV) results indicated greater linearity against the varying formaldehyde concentration between 0.05 and 5 μg/mL and had a low limit of detection about 0.011 μg/mL (Fig. 10a). The designed electrode can be applied in a practical way by developing a sensor device for the real-time detection of formaldehyde in food and dairy products [149].

Fig. 10.

Fig. 10

a Schematic demonstration of the development of LIG/Ag modified electrode for the sensing of formaldehyde. Reproduced with permission from American Chemical Society under copyright CC BY 4.0 [149]. b Graphical explanation of (AuNPs)-polypyrrole-chitosan-LIG-based sensor development for the sensing of vitamin C. Reproduced from Elsevier under copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. [78]. c A smart wireless sensor based on nanoPd@LIG modified electrode for the sensing of formaldehyde. Reproduced from Elsevier under copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. [79]. d Development of LIG electrode functionalized with porphyrin/ZnO for non-enzymatic sensing of ascorbic acid. Reproduced with permission from American Chemical Society under copyright CC BY 4.0 [80]

Similarly, another study was conducted by KongKaew et al. [78] to develop gold nanoparticles (AuNPs)-polypyrrole-chitosan on LIG for sensing vitamin C (ascorbic acid). During this study, the simultaneous fabrication of AuNPs and graphene was conducted on a polymer substrate via the laser ablation method. The Au precursor was synthesized in a solution of copolymer comprising pyrrole and chitosan, which improved the nucleation of Au on the LIG electrode. The structural and electrochemical attributes of the fabricated electrodes were investigated using SEM and cyclic voltammetry, respectively. The DPV measurements were performed at optimized parameters to improve the detection of ascorbic acid. The designed electrode exhibited two different linear ranges between 0.25–5.00 and 5.00 to 25.00 mmol L−1 and a lower limit of detection of 0.22 mmol L−1. This electrode was successfully applied for the detection of ascorbic acid (vitamin C) in orange juice with excellent reproducibility and recovery rate (Fig. 10b) [78].

Saleh et al. [79] developed a nano-palladium embedded LIG (nanoPd@LIG) electrode integrated with a wireless smartphone for the sensing of formaldehyde. The nanoPd@LIG composite was designed by single-step laser induction on a Pd2+-chitosan-polyimide sheet. The physicochemical properties of synthesized electrodes were investigated. In this study, the electrochemical sensing of formaldehyde at the nanoPd@LIG electrode was examined. The fabricated electrode was connected to a wireless mobile device for real-time monitoring of formaldehyde. This designed smart electrochemical sensing device is based on near-field communication mechanisms to receive power and transfer data to a smartphone. In addition, it showed a wide detection range between 0.01 and 4.00 mM and a lower detection limit of 6.4 μM with promising reproducibility and selectivity (Fig. 10c). The designed sensor was used to detect formaldehyde in actual food samples, and the results obtained were in agreement with potentiostat [79].

Another study was conducted by Pushparaj et al. [80] to develop an LIG electrode functionalized with porphyrin/ZnO for non-enzymatic sensing of ascorbic acid (vitamin C). In this study, the designed electrode was investigated as an extended gate field effect transistor (EGFETs). The sensitivity of LIG electrode modified with tetraphenylporphyrin/ZnO nanoparticles was higher than that of bare LIG. In addition, the limit of detection of the designed sensor was about 3 nM. This sensor also exhibited excellent selectivity by showing the signal response for ascorbic acid 250 times higher as compared to the same concentration of structural analog dopamine analyte. Furthermore, the developed sensor was used to sense ascorbic acid in real-food samples (Fig. 10d). Hence, this sensor can be applied effectively for commercial applications in the study of vitamin-rich food and dairy products [80].

A study was conducted by Gupta et al. [81] to develop a Cu-LIG nanocomposite for the sensing of vanillin in food samples. In this study, Cu-LIG nanocomposites were fabricated on indium tin oxide (ITO) as a working electrode. The designed material had higher surface area and conductivity, facilitating enhanced electrochemical sensing for the detection of vanillin. The fabricated Cu-LIG/ITO electrode was used to sense oxidized species of vanillin. The developed sensor had a broad linear concentration range from 0.25 to 40 μg/mL and a low limit of detection of 0.14 μg/mL (Fig. 11). Furthermore, this sensor exhibited promising selectivity for vanillin in the presence of structural analogue interfering analytes such as glucose, fructose, uric acid, and ascorbic acid. These results suggested that this strategy can be applied to the sensing of food and dairy ingredients in actual samples [81].

Fig. 11.

Fig. 11

a Cyclic voltammetry (CV) response. b UV–visible spectra after 02 CV cycles. c Calibration curve for Cu-LIG/ITO modified electrode against different concentration of vanillin. d Absorbance values for vanillin in the presence of structural analog interfering molecules. e Selectivity of vanillin at different concentrations with interfering analytes. f Intraday and interday vanillin measurements. Reproduced from Elsevier under copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. [81]

Food spoilage

Observing the food texture, flavor and safe packaging are mandatory measures to prevent food spoilage and food poisoning. In addition, the real-time detection of temperature, humidity, and gas emissions from food and dairy products reduces the risk of spoilage because temperature, humidity, and gas can predict food status and precise shelf-life. Furthermore, food and dairy products decompose easily if not preserved and stored at suitable temperatures. Hence, it is especially important to monitor food status before intake. Smart, precise, and real-time monitoring of food and dairy products will not only prevent food poisoning but also improve storage and shelf-life [167, 168]. LIG sensors can effectively monitor the food and dairy product’s status with promising sensitivity, selectivity, and low limit of detection [169171].

Jung et al. [7] designed smart paper flexible electronics by LIG to monitor food spoilage in real time. In this study, an LIG paper sensor was reported for wireless observing of food status through chemical- and thermo-sensing. Laser irradiation on paper transformed it into laser irradiated paper surface (LIPS) with sheet resistance 105 Ω sq−1. The porous structure of LIPS enabled the smart sensing of temperature and gas emissions from food samples. Laser induction at optimized conditions generated temperature and gas coefficient of resistance change 0.15%°C−1 and 0.0041% ppm−1. In addition, LIPS was fabricated on paper to monitor temperature and detect the decomposition of food by transferring data directly to mobile by wireless communication (Fig. 12). The designed LIPS sensor device can be used for commercial applications to monitor the status of food and dairy products in real time with greater fidelity [7].

Fig. 12.

Fig. 12

Schematic demonstration of LIPS fabrication. a Development of LIG on paper by laser induction. a-i) LIPS developed on the milk carton for food monitoring. a-ii) LIPS is designed on paper cups for the monitoring of food temperature. b Photograph of LIG fabricated on different materials. b-i) LIG fabricated on the milk carton. b-ii) LIG on paper cup substrate. b-iii) LIG on colored paper precursor. b-iv) A SEM image of LIG was fabricated on colored paper. Reproduced from Elsevier under copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. [7]

Another study was conducted by Chen et al. [172] to develop an LIG-based sensing system for the monitoring of food samples. The LIG-based flexible heating and sensing system was used to protect and store food in cold storage for long periods of time. The proposed system comprises two main parts: a flexible temperature sensor and a LIG heating component. Different electrical and structural attributes of the LIG heating component were studied to obtain the best performance. The designed LIG heating system indicated the best performance at a power of 12.5% and a scanning speed of 120 mm/s. For the practical applications, an anti-frostbite test was performed on fruits at the output voltage of 3 V. It was observed that this process takes only 14–20 s to set the range, and obtained results indicated that the designed system can effectively resist frostbite and sense the temperature of fruits surfaces precisely (Fig. 13). Hence, this strategy has promising applications in reducing food spoilage [172].

Fig. 13.

Fig. 13

Design of flexible sensing and heating system based on frostbite resistance in fruit cold storage. a Schematic presentation of flexible sensing and heating system on fruits. b Hardware layout of flexible sensing and heating system. c Diagrammatical illustration of flexible sensing and heating system. Reproduced with permission from American Chemical Society under copyright CC BY 4.0 [172]

Zhang et al. [173] developed a food preservation method based on laser-induced microporous packaging and coating with chitosan carbon dots. Modified atmosphere packaging (MAP) is extensively applied to preserve fresh food samples, including fruits and vegetables. The laser-induced MAP and carbon dot-chitosan coating effectively adjusted the gas composition during the fresh-cut cucumber storage period. The developed method supplied suitable oxygen and carbon dioxide concentrations of about 9.8% and 10.3%, respectively. The laser-induced microporous MAP (100 μm) coated with carbon dot-chitosan minimized the weight loss of about 4.1%, prevented flavor decomposition, and maintained it for 15th days in water distribution behavior (Fig. 14). Hence, this MAP method can be used effectively for the preservation and storage of fresh fruits and vegetables [173].

Fig. 14.

Fig. 14

Spider web graph shows the monitoring of flavor variations of fresh-cut cucumber after 15 days with laser-induced microporous packaging (100 μm) and coating with chitosan carbon dot. Reproduced with permission from Springer Nature under Copyright @ 2021 [173]

Biogenic amines and food additives

Biogenic amines are nitrogenous compounds with significant toxicological effects associated with food safety, food quality, and waste. High levels of biogenic amines in food and dairy products can cause food poisoning. On the other hand, low levels of biogenic amines may cause food intolerance. Biogenic amines in food samples are generated from endogenous enzymatic activity or microbial contaminations, which direct the decarboxylation of amino acids. There are different threshold concentrations of biogenic amines in different countries [174177]. Similarly, food additives are commonly used in the food and dairy industry, and their high levels have severe effects on human health. Therefore, the precise and accurate monitoring of food additives and biogenic amines is important to meet the limit suggested by food regulating authorities. LIG has been recommended to develop high-performance biosensors to detect biogenic amines and additives in food and dairy products [178181].

A study was conducted by Vanegas et al. [150] to develop an LIG biosensor for sensing biogenic amines (BA) in food products. In this study, the LIG electrode was produced from locally sourced substrates. For the fabrication of the biosensor, the LIG surface was modified with Cu microparticles and diamine oxidase. The designed amperometric LIG biosensor indicated promising performance with a lower limit of detection of 11.6 µM and a rapid response time of about 7.3 s. For practical applications, the fabricated LIG biosensor was used to detect total biogenic amine levels in fish food samples exposed to the fermentation process with lactic acid bacteria. This sensor indicated selectivity for BA even in complex food samples (Fig. 15). Hence, the developed sensor is highly suitable and can be used effectively to detect biogenic amines in food and dairy products. In addition, it can be used to monitor food samples while minimizing food waste and limiting foodborne poisoning [150].

Fig. 15.

Fig. 15

Schematic elaboration of a cost-effective disposable LSG biosensor for the sensing of biogenic amines in food samples by applying locally sourced materials and comparison was made with fabricated sensor of analytical grade materials. Reproduced with permission from MDPI under copyright CC BY 4.0 [150]

Similarly, Salvia et al. [182] fabricated wireless self-driven LIG biosensors for the monitoring of biogenic amines. Conventional biosensors require complex electronic devices, which limit their broad-spectrum applications. However, the LIG strategy has a simple and cost-effective setup in which complex circuits are printed on polymeric substrates by laser induction. In this study, a zero-power self-regulated wireless LIG biosensor based on polyimide was developed to sense amine in food samples. The interdigitated sensor and communication antenna were fabricated purely by LIG induction, with non-uniform lasing attributes. The designed sensor was flexible and had the potential to detect triethylamine with less than 15% concentration and high readability of about 1.5 m due to resorting to the backscattering modulation framework [182].

Soares et al. [151] designed ion-selective LIG electrodes for effectively sensing nitrite in food and dairy products. Nitrite is a commonly used food additive that adversely affects human health at high-level concentrations. Hence, the precise monitoring of nitrite levels in food and dairy products is highly mandatory. In this study, hydrophilic and hydrophobic LIG was fabricated, which transformed into an ion-selective biosensor to detect nitrite in food samples, and its performance was compared with the standard method (Griess method). The hydrophilic, ion-selective LIG electrode showed enhanced potential stability owing to a decrease in the water layer among the LIG electrode and ion-selective membrane based on nitrite polyvinyl chloride. The resulting designed sensor indicated a greater sensitivity of about 59.5 mV dec−1 and a low limit of detection of 0.3 ± 0.1 mg L−1 along with a broad linear concentration range between 10−5 and 10−1 M. In addition, the developed sensor was used successfully to monitor the nitrite level directly in food samples, including sausage, ham, and bacon (Fig. 16a). The above results indicated the versatility of ion-selective LIG electrodes for the development of biosensors with simple, cost-effective, and efficient sensing abilities. Hence, these sensors are highly promising in observing the nitrite concentration in food and dairy products effectively to ensure food regulatory compliance [151].

Fig. 16.

Fig. 16

a Graphical explanation of LIG ion-selective electrode development for the sensing of nitrite in food samples. Reproduced with permission from Springer Nature under Copyright @ 2022 [151]. b Diagrammatical illustration for the fabrication of Cu/LIG modified electrode for the sensing of vanillin in food samples. Reproduced from Elsevier under copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. [81]

Another study was conducted by Gupta et al. [81] to develop Cu-LIG nanocomposites for the detection of vanillin in food samples. Vanillin is a food additive commonly used as a fragrant or flavoring compound in food and dairy products. However, excessive use of vanillin has deteriorating impacts on human health. Hence, precise and sensitive measurements of vanillin in food samples are highly recommended. In this study, vanillin was successfully monitored by applying the UV–Vis Spectro electrochemical technique. In this method, Cu-LIG nanocomposites were deposited on an indium tin oxide (ITO) electrode. The designed modified Cu-LIG/ITO electrode was applied to detect oxidized vanillin at particular wavelengths with cyclic voltammetry measurements at 0–1.3 V potential. The developed sensor indicated a linear concentration range between 0.25 and 40 μg/mL with an R2 value of about 0.993 and a lower limit of detection of approximately 0.14 μg/mL. In addition, the designed sensor was highly selective and indicated no response toward interfering substances like glucose, fructose, and ascorbic acid (vitamin C) in actual food samples (Fig. 16b). Hence, this technology can be used for the detection of additives in commercial food and dairy products [81].

Antibiotics in food and dairy products

Antibiotics are the most commonly used secondary metabolites produced from particular fungal and bacterial strains. They have harmful impacts on human health and can play vital roles in the food, dairy, and medicine industries. Excessive use of antibiotics in animals leads to their accumulation in animal-derived foods like milk, meat, and dairy products. They put human health at risk by creating allergic reactions, antibiotic resistance, etc. [183185]. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has set a certain threshold for the use of antibiotics in food and dairy products to save consumer health. Hence, the sensitive and precise detection of antibiotics in food and dairy products before consumption is highly mandatory to guarantee and guard human health [186188].

A study was conducted by Abera et al. [2] to develop a LIG electrode optimized by imprinted polymer for the sensing of antibiotics (tetracycline) in food samples. In this work, three-electrode sensors were fabricated for the label-free sensing of tetracycline in food samples, including milk and meat. LIG electrodes modified with imprinted polymers and gold nanostructures were applied as biorecognition elements. LIG was developed on a polyimide sheet with a promising sheet resistance of about 17.27 ± 1.04 Ω/sq. The phenylenediamine monomer and tetracycline were molecularly imprinted on the LIG electrode. The designed sensor showed a very low limit of detection of about 0.85 nM in milk and 0.80 nM in meat samples. It also indicated a broad linear range concentration range between 10 and 300 nM (Fig. 17a). In addition, the developed sensor depicted good stability, reproducibility, and selectivity; hence, it can be used efficiently for the detection of antibiotics in food and dairy products [2].

Fig. 17.

Fig. 17

a Selectivity test of LIG electrode optimized by imprinted polymer-based biosensor for the sensing of tetracycline. a-i) The differential pulse voltammetry (DPV) curves against different concentrations of tetracycline. a-ii) Linear concentration range of the designed sensor. Reproduced with permission from MDPI under copyright CC BY 4.0 [2]. b Schematic demonstration for the development of LIG electrode modified by gold nanoparticles for the sensing of sulfonamide in shrimp food sample. Reproduced with permission from Springer Nature under Copyright @ 2022 [152]

Qiu et al. [152] designed a wireless flexible sensor based on a LIG electrode modified by gold nanoparticles for the sensing of sulfonamide in aquatic food products. In this study, LIG was developed on a polyimide sheet by laser induction, followed by the fabrication of gold nanoparticles on the surface of the LIG electrode. The developed sensor showed promising sensitivity towards sulfonamide with a linear concentration range between 0.4 and 100 μM and a lower limit of detection of about 0.035 μM. Furthermore, the fabricated sensor showed excellent recovery in the range of 96.04–105.00% in fish and shrimp samples. This sensor was integrated with a wireless Bluetooth device for real-life applications (Fig. 17b). The designed sensor indicated greater feasibility and practicability for on-site monitoring of sulfonamide in food samples to ensure food safety [152].

Similarly, another study conducted by Zheng et al. [153] developed a molecular imprinted sensor made of an LIG electrode for the monitoring of tigecycline. In this study, a LIG electrode modified gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) was developed to detect tigecycline in food samples. The molecular imprinted polymer-based AuNPs LIG electrode was electropolymerized by o-phenylenediamine and tigecycline substrate. The developed sensor exhibited a broad linear concentration range between 0.01 and 800 nM, with a lower limit of detection of about 0.003 nM. For real-life applications, this sensor was used to detect tigecycline in milk and meat food samples and indicated promising sensitivity with a lower limit of detection of about 0.15 nM and 0.21 nM, correspondingly (Fig. 18). In addition, the developed sensor depicted greater selectivity, stability, and reproducibility. These results demonstrated that designed sensors can be used effectively for the sensing of tigecycline in food and dairy products and have advantages over conventional methods by being facile, cost-effective, sensitive, and practical [153].

Fig. 18.

Fig. 18

A DPV curves of AuNPs/LIG electrode against different concentrations of tigecycline. B Linear concentration curves of the designed sensor. C DPV curves of the fabricated sensor to detect the tigecycline in the milk sample. D DPV curves of the fabricated sensor to detect tigecycline in meat extract. Reproduced from Elsevier under copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. [153]

Zeng et al. [154] designed a portable LIG flexible sensor to monitor sulfonamides in food and water samples. In this work, the LIG electrode was modified with 2D hexagonal boron nitride, and the electrochemical performance was promising. The designed sensor was small, portable, flexible, and cost-effective to sense sulfamethoxazole at a low oxidation potential of about 0.56 V. This sensor showed a wide linear concentration range of about 0.5–362.5 µM, with a limit of detection 0.011 µM and excellent recovery range of about 97.5% in milk sample and 101.3% in lake water sample. Furthermore, the developed sensor was used to detect other sulfonamide drug products, including sulfanilamide, sulfapyridine, sulfadimidine, and sulfisoxazole (Fig. 19a). Hence, this sensor can be used for rapid and on-site monitoring of antibiotics in food and water samples to ensure food and environmental safety issues [154].

Fig. 19.

Fig. 19

a Graphical demonstration of portable and flexible biosensor based on LIG for the sensitive monitoring of sulfonamide. Reproduced from Elsevier under copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. [154]. b Schematic illustration of paper-based biosensor device based on LIG/PbS/CdS electrode modified with CoOOH nanosheets for the sensing of ampicillin. Reproduced from Elsevier under copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. [155]

Qiu et al. [155] designed a portable, flexible, paper-based biosensor device composed of LIG/PbS/CdS electrodes modified with CoOOH nanosheets to monitor ampicillin antibiotics. In this study, ampicillin was integrated onto paper in a reaction chamber as a biogate aptamer to recognize a particular analyte. After the interaction with the target analyte, glutathione was released into the reaction chamber, and the etching of CoOOH nanosheets exposed the modified electrode (LIG/PbS/CdS) to generate a photocurrent signal. Paper-based designed sensor indicated a wide linear concentration range of about 5.0–2 × 104 pM and lower limits of detection of about 1.36 pM. Furthermore, the developed sensor was used for real-time applications to sense ampicillin in milk and water samples and showed promising selectivity, excellent stability, and a higher percentage of reproducibility (Fig. 19b). These results demonstrated its potential applications in food sample analysis and environmental safety monitoring [155].

Chemical contaminants and pesticides

The presence of chemical contaminants and pesticides in food and beverages has deteriorating impacts on human and animal health. Cost-effective detection of chemical contaminants and pesticides in food and dairy products is highly mandatory to ensure the quality and safety of food samples [189192]. Hence, it is recommended that flexible, portable, consumer-friendly, and quantitative sensor devices be developed to monitor pesticides and chemical contaminants in food samples and guarantee food safety. Herein, LIG-based flexible sensors are suggested for sensing contaminants, and pesticides/insecticides in food samples [193196].

A study was conducted by Mostaccio et al. [197] to develop a self-powered wireless LIG biosensor for the monitoring of triethylamine. In this study, an LIG-based self-powered biosensor device was constructed, integrated with an antenna and an interdigitated capacitor fabricated by laser induction to optimize the radiation performance and indicate the signal on the sensor device. The designed sensor is portable and can be studied from about 1.6 m via radio frequency identification (RFID). For the sensing applications, the sensor was coated with a chemical interactive material that was compatible to interact with triethylamine compounds. In addition, integrating developed sensors with machine learning algorithms made it possible to detect various concentrations of amine between 10 and 45%. These results suggested that developed sensors can be used effectively to monitor volatile organic compounds, pesticides, and insecticides in food and dairy products [197].

Similarly, another study was conducted by Vignesh et al. [156] to design a LIG electrode modified by Ag-La(OH)3@Dy2O3 composite for sensing bisphenol A and tartrazine in food samples. The modified LIG electrode showed an enhanced electron transfer rate and promising electrochemical sensing activity for bisphenol A and tartrazine with a lower limit of detection of 9.2 nM and 0.96 nM respectively. In addition, the designed sensor was used for real-life applications to monitor organic contaminants, including bisphenol A and tartrazine, in food samples (Fig. 20). Hence, a designed sensor is suggested for the real-time monitoring of organic contaminants in food and dairy products [198].

Fig. 20.

Fig. 20

A Adsorptive stripping differential pulse voltammetry (AdsDPV) curves of fabricated LIG electrode-based biosensor against different concentrations of bisphenol A. B Correlation between peak current and bisphenol A concentration. C AdsDPV curves for real water sample analysis by using the standard addition method. D AdsDPV curves of the designed sensor against different concentrations of tartrazine. E Correlation between peak current and tartrazine concentration. F AdsDPV curves of the fabricated sensor for the monitoring of tartrazine in real isotonic drink sample by applying standard addition approach.

Reproduced from Elsevier under copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. [198]

Liu et al. [157] developed a portable, flexible LIG and MnO2-linked DNA amplification-based sensor for the sensing of pesticides in food samples. Herein, the biosensor was developed by a LIG electrode patterned on polyimide foil and modified by MnO2 nanosheets deposited on paper with organophosphorus (OPs) substrates. The sensing mechanism of this sensor was based on acetylcholinesterase-initiated disintegration of MnO2 to release DNA signal to trigger enzyme-mediated amplification. The enzymatic activity of the acetylcholinesterase enzyme was inhibited in the presence of OPs and, resulting in the cleavage of the probe on LIG modified electrode, was not initiated. The generated electrochemical signals indicated the presence of OPs in food samples. Furthermore, the developed sensor indicated a wide linear concentration range between 3 and 400 ng/mL, with a limit of detection of about 1.2 ng/mL (Fig. 21). For the real-time application, this sensor was used to monitor the OPs levels in vegetable samples, and it showed excellent sensitivity. Hence, the developed sensor device can be used to monitor food quality and ensure environmental safety [157].

Fig. 21.

Fig. 21

Graphical demonstration of proposed sensing mechanism of designed LIG and MnO2 linked DNA amplification-based sensor for the sensing of pesticides in food samples. Reproduced from Elsevier under copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. [157]

Similarly, Johnson et al. [158] conducted a study to develop LIG derived biosensor for monitoring the herbicide glyphosate. Glyphosate is a commonly used herbicide and has a harmful impact on farmers and crops. In this study, an LIG sensor was constructed to rapidly sense glyphosate and ensure the safety of farmers, crops, and water. The glycine oxidase enzyme was immobilized on the surface of the LIG electrode modified with platinum to monitor the glyphosate. The developed sensor exhibited a broad linear concentration range of 10 to 260 µm and a lower limit of detection of about 3.03 µm with a sensitivity of approximately 0.991 nA µm−1. Furthermore, the designed sensor showed excellent selectivity in the presence of interfering herbicides as well as insecticides (Fig. 22). This sensor was used to monitor glyphosate in real water and crop residue samples. These results demonstrated the potential of a designed sensor to be applied for sensing of herbicides in food samples [158].

Fig. 22.

Fig. 22

A Demonstration of glyphosate LIG sensor development and sensing mechanism. a) LIG patterning on polyimide (PI) sheet by laser induction. b) Platinum deposition at potential −0.5 V against Ag/AgCl. c) SEM image of platinum-modified LIG electrode. d) Drop casting of glutaraldehyde, flavin adenine dinucleotide and glycine oxidase. e) Sensing mechanism of glyphosate via electrochemical oxidation at potential 0.6 V. Reproduced with permission from WILEY under copyright CC BY 4.0 [158]. B Schematic illustration of neonicotinoids sensing by using LIG sensor. Reproduced with permission under copyright CC BY 4.0 [199]. C LIG sensor for the electrochemical sensing of paraquat in water. Reproduced with permission under copyright CC BY 4.0 [200]. D Explanation of 3D porous LIG flexible plant sensor for pesticide monitoring. Reproduced from Elsevier under copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V [201]

Commonly used pesticides like neonicotinoids cause significant risks to pollinators, ecosystems, and human health. However, there is still a lack of real-time tools to detect pesticide residues in the aquatic ecosystem. Johnson et al. design an advanced electrochemical sensor system, based on LIG to cover up these critical gaps by quick, label free sensing of four major neonicotinoids including clothianidin (CLO), imidacloprid (IMD), thiamethoxam (TMX), and dinotefuran (DNT), showing low limit detection and fast response time without chemical functionalization. These LIG sensors are fabricated using a scalable and mask-free laser procedure, revealing high selectivity and effective differentiation of neonicotinoids from common pesticides. This cost-effective platform of LIG sensors meets the criteria for monitoring pesticide traces in laboratories and will play a significant role in future field implementable applications. This step is crucial for protecting the environment from detrimental chemicals and pesticides [199].

The increasing concern over pesticide and herbicide residues, particularly highly toxic and persistent paraquat (PQ), is causing severe environmental and public health concerns, necessitating advanced detection approaches. Traditional techniques, such as UV–vis spectroscopy, chromatography, and fluorescence titration, are often expensive, complex, labor-intensive, and limited to lab experiments. That’s why here is the illustration of flexible, field deployable electrochemical sensors based on laser induced graphene, specifically square-wave voltammetry (SWV), which are sensitive, fast, and an effective tool for the first time detection of PQ. Optimization and surface characterization of LIG through FE-SEM and Raman spectroscopy improved its electrochemical performance, porous structure, and hydrophilicity. The selectivity and sensitivity of LIG-based sensors in order to detect PQ can be optimized by optimizing parameters like pH and deposition potential. Real-world application of flexible LIG-based sensors was endorsed for the first time in the tap water sample, indicating the significant potential for the quick, real-time detection of pesticides like PQ in Laboratories and fields [200].

Similarly, for the detection of organophosphorus pesticide, a flexible electrochemical sensor using laser-induced graphene was designed that is patterned on polyimide to generate three three-electrode system, with a combination of pralidoxime (PAM) and CeO2 for enhancement of electrocatalysis. Electrochemical properties, optimized fabrication parameters, portable, cost-effective, highly sensitive, and stable LIG sensors demonstrated outstanding detection of pesticides. Its excellent sensitivity, repeatability, stability, and anti-interference make it appropriate for the detection of organophosphorus pesticides both in field and lab-based monitoring [201].

The plant-wearable biosensors fabricated through LIG and transferred through polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS), modified with organophosphorus hydrolase (OPH), gold nanoparticles (AuNPs), and a biocompatible semisolid electrolyte, can be used for fast, in situ, selective detection of methyl parathion, providing real-time data wirelessly transmitted to a smartphone for further electrochemical analysis. This innovative approach offers a significant tool for onsite monitoring of pesticide residues in the laboratory and field, thus promoting the smart and precision farming system [202].

Studies show the development of a biomimetic fern leaf pesticide collection patch and an electrochemical LIG biosensor to generate a “collect-and-sense” system for rapid pesticide spray monitoring in the field. In this setup, the LIG patch gathers pesticide spray and electrochemical sensors integrated with platinum nanoparticles and glycine oxidase, which detects glyphosate precisely. This portable, scalable system enables remote analysis with 97% accuracy compared to commercial systems. It is also helpful for onsite, rapid pesticide monitoring in labs and fields, supporting precision agriculture, and lessening environmental impacts [203].

Mu et al. [202] developed an LIG hybrid electrode modified with silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) for the detection of food contaminants by electrochemical sensing based on surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS). Herein, the LIG/AgNPs modified electrode showed excellent electrocatalytic activity by integrating potentiostat with Raman spectroscopy that enabled the observation SERS spectra against particular analytes. The developed sensor was used to sense 4-aminobenzenethiol (4-ABT), melamine, a food contaminant of milk, and antibiotics in a river water sample (Fig. 23). Furthermore, this sensor showed excellent sensitivity and a broad linear concentration range. Simple and cost-effective fabrication of developed sensors make it a promising candidate for large-scale monitoring of food samples and environmental analysis [202].

Fig. 23.

Fig. 23

a Schematic elaboration of LIG electrode fabrication by laser induction on polyimide sheet. b LIG surface modification by silver nanoparticles (AgNPs). c Immobilization of analyte and cell encapsulation on LIG electrode surface. d EC-SERS monitoring setup. “Silver nanoparticles–laser-induced graphene. Reproduced with permission from Royal Society of Chemistry under copyright CC BY-NC 3.0 [202]

Current challenges and future outlook

Laser-induced graphene (LIG) has gained huge attention in biosensing applications owing to its unique physicochemical and rheological properties. LIG biosensors are promising devices in food and dairy industry applications. They have low toxicity, excellent biocompatibility, and highly sensitive properties, which make them favorable candidates for biosensing [201, 203]. In addition, LIG biosensors integrated with artificial intelligence, machine learning, self-powered and wireless communication systems enable them for advanced sensing applications in food and dairy industries [204, 205]. Furthermore, LIG sensors based on natural substrate materials, including leaves, wood, and polymers, have higher biocompatibility and, hence, can be used effectively to fabricate green electronics biosensor devices. Although LIG biosensors have gained significant advancement still there are certain limitations and challenges that need to be addressed for practical applications [206, 207].

The selection of a suitable material is critical for developing good-quality LIG. There are a lot of structural defects that are mandatory for the practical applications of LIG biosensors. Sometimes, amorphous carbon is produced along with LIG during the laser induction process. Therefore, it is challenging to develop LIG sheets with uniform arrangement [55, 208]. However, defects and impurities can impact the physiochemical attributes by providing greater electrocatalytic activity, transport kinetics, and higher energy states. Another challenge is to reduce inevitable impure products like amorphous carbon during fabrication. Impurities from natural materials have a greater influence on the performance of LIG biosensors. Hence, suitable purification methods must be developed, which should be simple and cost-effective. Future research will facilitate comprehending associations among porous structures, substrate chemistry, and laser induction conditions to gain particular sensing properties [100, 209].

LIG fabrication mechanisms need to be optimized to control defects in LIG development. Further research and deep understanding would direct us to develop LIG from precursor substrate with elaborate doping elements, which can change the electronic configuration of graphene. These doping elements enhance LIG’s sensing abilities. Generally, LIG is integrated with other materials for biosensing. To optimize the sensitivity of the designed LIG biosensor, it should be integrated with a material that has a higher surface area and tunable energy bandgap. For this purpose, LIG with 3D and porous structures besides conductive properties is suggested for biosensor fabrications. Furthermore, large-scale production of LIG biosensors with sensitive, reliable, and stable performances is still challenging. To overcome these limitations, the roll-to-roll fabrication method is suggested for automated and commercial-scale production of LIG-based biosensors [133, 210, 211].

LIG biosensors must be compatible with flexible wearable electronic devices for practical applications. The consistency of sensing abilities, when biosensor devices are damaged, is a major challenge. To cope with this challenge, it is recommended that biosensors should be developed, such as a biosensor device small enough to minimize the deformation as much as possible. Furthermore, the integration between the LIG sheet and the conducting substrate layer is not too much and can be separated from each other by mild scratching. In addition, flexible biosensor devices that often undergo bending issues must be addressed during the fabrication process. Briefly, substrate transfer, nanocomposite for LIG fabrications, and device structure and configurations are highly promising strategies to attain desirable biosensors for food and dairy applications [212214].

Safety is a great challenge for biosensors applied in food and dairy applications and puts risk to human health due to inhalation of graphene. The cytotoxicity studies of graphene and graphene-derived materials indicated varying levels of toxicity to model animals, like morphological disorders to zebrafish, and inflammation was observed in mice and rats as well. Surprisingly, LIG showed no toxicity to model animal zebrafish even at higher concentration [215217]. However, it is suggested to do further research to ensure the cytotoxic effects of LIG and possible prevention for the leakage of graphene. This can be achieved by coating or cross-linking nanocomposites with LIG, which stops graphene detaching from LIG and maintains its porous structure as well [218, 219].

To date, most LIG biosensing is based on electrochemical methods, which have certain limitations like less sensitivity and selectivity. To combat these challenges, fluorescence, surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy, and quartz crystal microbalance-based LIG biosensors are suggested for optimized biosensing applications [65, 96, 220]. Furthermore, it is recommended that multimodal LIG biosensors be developed for practical usage owing to their simple fabrication mechanism, direct laser writing process, and surface modifications for multiplexing. Moreover, in the future, LIG biosensors should be embedded with different flexible devices and self-regulated triboelectric nanogenerators (TENGs) for automated sensing applications. The performance of LIG biosensors, including stability, biocompatibility, conductivity, and electrochemical activities, can be enhanced further by controlling the surface morphology, porous structure, and functionalization. LIG doping with suitable dopant elements is a promising strategy to develop more precise and robust biosensor devices for advanced biosensing applications [55, 100, 221, 222].

The long-term structural and functional stability of LIG electrodes, particularly under different storage conditions, is still challenging. Similarly, analyte selectivity in the presence of structural analogue molecules in complex food matrices remains a vital challenge. These limitations need to be addressed by material engineering and surface modification strategies. Furthermore, concerns are present regarding the safety and biocompatibility of LIG, especially the residual dopants. Hence, it is suggested that green synthesis approaches be used, surface coating with biocompatible materials, and post-synthesis treatment to minimize potential toxicity. To ensure safety, clinical trials and pilot studies are required for validation. Although LIG development is cost-effective than other graphene synthesis approaches, high-quality and industrial-scale production remains challenging [223].

Physical parameters such as temperature, humidity, and pressure hinder the precision and accuracy of LIG sensors. Hence, it is mandatory to minimize interference among these physical parameters to obtain reliability in multimodal biosensors. This can be achieved through complicated signal processing machine algorithms, AI integration, and optimizations in sensor design. In short, it can be summarized that deep research and continued efforts are demanded in LIG direct fabrications with desired features, which will stimulate rapid advancements in the biosensors field [100, 223]. LIG-based sensors have emerged as a strong diagnostic apparatus in the real-life transformation to the field and commercial level because of their unique characteristics like a low-cost fabrication process, reconfigurable surface nature, and electroanalytical performance. They are highly compatible with malleable substrates and additive manufacturing that includes packaging of food, polymer layers, and marking of laser on paper, and they are supportive of incorporation into portable, wearable, and consumable strategies. Wireless data transmission, smartphone-based statistics, and self-powered procedure could be possible by launching advance, in situ monitoring systems for food safety. LIG biosensors have fascinating resolution for decentralized food quality assurance, scalable production, and environmental sustainability, specifically where there are limited resources for monitoring supply chains [37].

In the current era, the advancement in machine learning (ML) and AI has played an innovative role in optimizing LIG-based biosensors like the use of the Bayesian optimization approach to systematically tune the laser parameters, including speed, power, wavelength, pulse frequency, and exposure time, to enhance the quality and electroanalytical performance of LIG electrodes. ML-driven models minimize experimental trials and improve the reproducibility of LIG development. The ML algorithms, such as support vector machine and artificial neural networks, facilitate determining material properties and LIG sensor performance based on fabrication methods and environmental exposures. Hence, the incorporation of ML and AI into LIG synthesis will enhance the precision, sensitivity, and reproducibility of designed sensors [224, 225]. Table 3 summarizes how LIG sensors are applied to detect food decay and smart packing. These flexible sensors, due to wireless communication, monitor gas emission, temperature, microbial activity, and real-time, onsite status tracking of food packaging. This table also presents the emerging potential of LIG sensors in innovative food safety systems.

Table 3.

Advantages, disadvantages, and requirements for LIG-based-biosensors in the food and dairy industry

Advantages Disadvantages/limitations References

Ease of use

Fast response

Higher sensitivity

Higher selectivity

Cost-effective

Wide detection range

Wireless communication

Point of care devices

Environmentally friendly

Complex matrix

Changing metabolites

Crosslinked constituents

Multi-component analysis

Cleaning and safety

Biocompatibility

Mechanical stability

Calibration

[37, 43, 226]
Requirements

Food safety

Fast response and recovery time

Reliability and reproducibility

Improved limit of detection

Integration with AI, IoT, and machine learning

Self-regulated

Self-powered

Flexible and smaller size

Approved by regulatory authorities

Low maintenance

Greater sustainability

[5, 224, 225]

Conclusion

LIG has been utilized extensively in developing advanced biosensors. The cost-effectiveness, adjustable surface chemistry, eco-friendliness, and ease of fabrication make LIG a suitable candidate. There are extensive details about various approaches to fabricating LIG through several laser systems, precursor materials, and amenable surface approaches, helping the LIG-biosensors to boost their activity. Several fundamental sensing approaches, reinforcing the analytical performance of the LIG, such as capacitive, piezoelectric, electrochemical, piezoresistive, and FET-based techniques, are explained extensively in this review. Additionally, there is a focus on the wide role of LIG in the food and dairy industry, for the sensitive, on-site, and precise monitoring of food pathogens, antibiotics, additives, and deterioration indicators. As there is higher demand for the maintenance, safety, and quality of food, LIG biosensors are considered remarkable tools because of distinctive features like compatibility, miniaturization potential, and flexibility with digital packaging and IoT. Optimization and surface functionalization of LIG electrodes with suitable doping elements enhance the sensitivity of the designed sensors. Various LIG-derived high-performance biosensor devices have been developed to date. Integrating LIG-based biosensors with AI, IoT, MIP, and machine learning can yield advanced biosensors for various applications.

Author Contribution

Muhammad Ikram: Writing – original draft, Visualization, Software, and Investigation. Prafulla Salunke: Writing – review & editing, Supervision, and Project administration. Arshid Numan: Writing – review & editing, Supervision, and Project administration. Mazhar Sher: Writing – review & editing, Supervision, and Project administration.

Funding

This research was funded by (1) the South Dakota Nutrient Research Council (S4176), (2) the South Dakota Soybean Research and Promotion Council (3X5027), (3) the National Science Foundation RII Track-2 FEC: Center for Climate Conscious Agricultural Technologies (CCAT) Award # 2316502, (4) the Hatch Project (3AH788), (5) Midwest Dairy, and (6) the Multi Hatch Project (NC1194) funded by USDA NIFA through the South Dakota Agricultural Experimental Station at South Dakota State University.

Data Availability

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

Declarations

Competing interests 

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Nau A et al (2023) Impact of the revision of European food hygiene legislation and the introduction of convenience-based food on food safety in the German military. J Food Prot 86(5):100073 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Abera BD et al (2021) Laser-induced graphene electrodes modified with a molecularly imprinted polymer for detection of tetracycline in milk and meat. Sensors 22(1):269 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Setti M et al (2025) Sustainable electrochemical sensors from cork-derived laser induced graphene: non-enzymatic glucose detection in urine. Sens Actuators B: Chem 430: 137352
  • 4.Harun-Or-Rashid M, Mirzaei S, Nasiri N (2025) Nanomaterial innovations and machine learning in gas sensing technologies for real-time health diagnostics. ACS Sens 10(3):1620–1640 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Aftab S et al (2024) Laser-induced graphene for advanced sensing: comprehensive review of applications. ACS sensors 9(9):4536–4554 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Lee JC et al (2023) Case studies of small-medium food enterprises around the world: major constraints and benefits from the implementation of food safety management systems. Foods 12(17):3218 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Jung Y et al (2022) Smart paper electronics by laser-induced graphene for biodegradable real-time food spoilage monitoring. Appl Mater Today 29:101589 [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Soares RR et al (2020) Laser-induced graphene electrochemical immunosensors for rapid and label-free monitoring of Salmonella enterica in chicken broth. ACS sensors 5(7):1900–1911 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Wan S et al (2018) A highly skin-conformal and biodegradable graphene-based strain sensor. Small Methods 2(10):1700374 [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Allahbakhsh A et al (2024) Graphene-based engineered living materials. Small Methods 8(1):2300930 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Hong S et al (2023) Surface morphological growth characteristics of laser-induced graphene with UV pulsed laser and sensor applications. ACS Mater Lett 5(4):1261–1270 [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Xiong Z et al (2022) Harnessing the 2D structure-enabled viscoelasticity of graphene-based hydrogel membranes for chronic neural interfacing. Small Methods 6(5):2200022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kabiri Ameri S et al (2017) Graphene electronic tattoo sensors. ACS Nano 11(8):7634–7641 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Geim AK, Novoselov KS (2007) The rise of graphene. Nat Mater 6(3):183–191 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Zhao Y et al (2016) Review on the graphene based optical fiber chemical and biological sensors. Sens Actuators, B Chem 231:324–340 [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Chabot V et al (2014) A review of graphene and graphene oxide sponge: material synthesis and applications to energy and the environment. Energy Environ Sci 7(5):1564–1596 [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Liu Y, Dong X, Chen P (2012) Biological and chemical sensors based on graphene materials. Chem Soc Rev 41(6):2283–2307 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Yuan W et al (2012) High-performance NO2 sensors based on chemically modified graphene. Adv Mater (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) 25(5):766–771 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Bharti R et al (2024) Low temperature synthesis of carbon nanostructures. Handbook of Functionalized Carbon Nanostructures: From Synthesis Methods to Applications 1–45
  • 20.Dananjaya V et al (2024) Synthesis, properties, applications, 3D printing and machine learning of graphene quantum dots in polymer nanocomposites. Prog Mater Sci 144:101282 [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Novoselov KS et al (2004) Electric field effect in atomically thin carbon films. Science 306(5696):666–669 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 22.Stankovich S et al (2006) Stable aqueous dispersions of graphitic nanoplatelets via the reduction of exfoliated graphite oxide in the presence of poly (sodium 4-styrenesulfonate). J Mater Chem 16(2):155–158 [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Li X et al (2009) Large-area synthesis of high-quality and uniform graphene films on copper foils. science 324(5932):1312–1314 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Lin J et al (2014) Laser-induced porous graphene films from commercial polymers. Nat Commun 5(5714):10.1038 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Lin J et al (2014) Laser-induced porous graphene films from commercial polymers. Nat Commun 5(1):5714 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Zhu J, Huang X, Song W (2021) Physical and chemical sensors on the basis of laser-induced graphene: mechanisms, applications, and perspectives. ACS Nano 15(12):18708–18741 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Meskher H et al (2022) Sensitive rGO/MOF based electrochemical sensor for penta-chlorophenol detection: a novel artificial neural network (ANN) application. Sensors & Diagnostics 1(5):1032–1043 [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Meskher H et al (2024) A review on CNTs-based electrochemical sensors and biosensors: unique properties and potential applications. Crit Rev Anal Chem 54(7):2398–2421 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Meskher H et al (2022) Simultaneous and selective electrochemical determination of catechol and hydroquinone on a nickel oxide (NiO) reduced graphene oxide (rGO) doped multiwalled carbon nanotube (fMWCNT) modified platinum electrode. Anal Lett 55(9):1466–1481 [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Beduk T et al (2020) One-step electrosynthesized molecularly imprinted polymer on laser scribed graphene bisphenol a sensor. Sens Actuators B Chem 314:128026 [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Carvalho AF et al (2018) Laser-induced graphene strain sensors produced by ultraviolet irradiation of polyimide. Adv Func Mater 28(52):1805271 [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Tao L-Q et al (2017) An intelligent artificial throat with sound-sensing ability based on laser induced graphene. Nat Commun 8(1):14579 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Yan W et al (2020) Size-tunable flowerlike MoS2 nanospheres combined with laser-induced graphene electrodes for NO2 sensing. ACS Applied Nano Materials 3(3):2545–2553 [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Ma W et al (2020) Recent advances in preparation and application of laser-induced graphene in energy storage devices. Materials Today Energy 18:100569 [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Huang L et al (2020) Laser-induced graphene: en route to smart sensing. Nano-micro letters 12:1–17 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Meskher H et al (2023) Recent trends in carbon nanotube (CNT)-based biosensors for the fast and sensitive detection of human viruses: a critical review. Nanoscale advances 5(4):992–1010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Li Z et al (2024) Laser-induced graphene-based sensors in health monitoring: progress, sensing mechanisms, and applications. Small Methods 8(11):2400118 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Kumar R et al (2024) Laser-induced and catalyst-free formation of graphene materials for energy storage and sensing applications. Chemical Engineering Journal 497:154968 [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Zhao Y et al (2017) Integrated graphene systems by laser irradiation for advanced devices. Nano Today 12:14–30 [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Shukla S, Kang S-Y, Saxena S (2019) Synthesis and patterning of graphene: strategies and prospects. Appl Phys Rev 6(2)
  • 41.Kumar R et al (2017) Laser-assisted synthesis, reduction and micro-patterning of graphene: recent progress and applications. Coord Chem Rev 342:34–79 [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Wang Y et al (2022) Laser-based growth and treatment of graphene for advanced photo-and electro-related device applications. Adv Func Mater 32(42):2203164 [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Wanjari VP et al (2023) Laser-induced graphene-based electrochemical biosensors for environmental applications: a perspective. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30(15):42643–42657 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Reddy YVM et al (2022) Strategies, advances, and challenges associated with the use of graphene-based nanocomposites for electrochemical biosensors. Adv Coll Interface Sci 304:102664 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Vivaldi FM et al (2021) Three-dimensional (3D) laser-induced graphene: structure, properties, and application to chemical sensing. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 13(26):30245–30260 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Li Z et al (2024) Laser-induced graphene-based sensors in health monitoring: progress, sensing mechanisms, and applications. Small Methods 8(11):e2400118 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Duley W (2012) CO2 lasers effects and applications
  • 48.Rahimi R et al (2015) Highly stretchable and sensitive unidirectional strain sensor via laser carbonization. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 7(8):4463–4470 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Cai J, Lv C, Watanabe A (2018) Laser direct writing and selective metallization of metallic circuits for integrated wireless devices. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 10(1):915–924 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Wan Z et al (2018) Laser-reduced graphene: synthesis, properties, and applications. Advanced Materials Technologies 3(4):1700315 [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Liu X, Lægsgaard J, Turchinovich D (2010) Highly-stable monolithic femtosecond Yb-fiber laser system based on photonic crystal fibers. Opt Express 18(15):15475–15483 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Parkula V et al (2024) Laser-Patterned Polyurethane Composites with Graphene, Graphene Oxide, and Aramid Fibers for the Production of Electric Circuits, Sensors, and Heaters. ACS Applied Nano Materials 7(15):18077-18088
  • 53.Le TSD et al (2022) Recent advances in laser-induced graphene: mechanism, fabrication, properties, and applications in flexible electronics. Adv Func Mater 32(48):2205158 [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Staupendahl G (2014) A novel Q-switched CO2 laser and its applications: efficient generation of short pulses with peak powers up to 100 kW and high average power. Laser Tech J 11(5):22–25 [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Avinash K, Patolsky F (2023) Laser-induced graphene structures: from synthesis and applications to future prospects. Materials Today 70: 104–136
  • 56.Park H et al (2023) Laser‐based selective material processing for next‐generation additive manufacturing. Adv Mater 36(34):2307586 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 57.Zhang Y et al (2023) Laser micro/nano-structuring pushes forward smart sensing: opportunities and challenges. Adv Func Mater 33(8):2211272 [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Pinheiro T et al (2024) Direct laser writing: from materials synthesis and conversion to electronic device processing. Advanced Materials 36:2402014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Cholkar A et al (2023) Advances in laser-based surface texturing for developing antifouling surfaces: a comprehensive review. Applied Surface Science Advances 18:100513 [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Addanki S, Amiri IS, Yupapin P (2018) Review of optical fibers-introduction and applications in fiber lasers. Results in Physics 10:743–750 [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Wang J et al (2020) Recent advances in mode-locked fiber lasers based on two-dimensional materials. Nanophotonics 9(8):2315–2340 [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Gagliani BW (2020) High-power gain-switched Ytterbium-doped fiber laser. (Doctoral dissertation, Politecnico di Torino)
  • 63.Chen KK (2011) High power pulsed ytterbium doped fibre lasers and their applications. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Southampton)
  • 64.Zhao Z, Kobayashi Y, Jiang S (2020) Fiber lasers. Handbook of Laser Micro-and Nano-Engineering,Springer International Publishing, 1–32
  • 65.Wan Z et al (2020) Laser induced graphene for biosensors. Sustain Mater Technol 25:e00205 [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Garland NT et al (2023) Wearable flexible perspiration biosensors using laser-induced graphene and polymeric tape microfluidics. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 15(32):38201–38213 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Meskher H et al (2023) A magnetite composite of molecularly imprinted polymer and reduced graphene oxide for sensitive and selective electrochemical detection of catechol in water and milk samples: an artificial neural network (ANN) application. J Electrochem Soc 170(4):047502 [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Meskher H et al (2023) A novel pentachlorophenol electrochemical sensor based on nickel-cobalt layered double hydroxide doped with reduced graphene oxide composite. ECS Advances 2(1):016503 [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Tehrani F, Bavarian B (2016) Facile and scalable disposable sensor based on laser engraved graphene for electrochemical detection of glucose. Sci Rep 6(1):27975 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Fenzl C et al (2017) Laser-scribed graphene electrodes for aptamer-based biosensing. Acs Sensors 2(5):616–620 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Lahcen AA et al (2020) Electrochemical sensors and biosensors using laser-derived graphene: a comprehensive review. Biosens Bioelectron 168:112565 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Tan PS et al (2021) Laser scribing fabrication of graphitic carbon biosensors for label-free detection of interleukin-6. Nanomaterials 11(8):2110 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Preechakasedkit P et al (2023) Dual colorimetric/electrochemical detection of salmonella typhimurium using a laser-induced graphene integrated lateral flow immunoassay strip. Anal Chem 95(37):13904–13912 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Zhao L et al (2023) Laser reduced graphene oxide electrode for pathogenic escherichia coli detection. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 15(7):9024–9033 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Butler D et al (2023) Cellulose-based laser-induced graphene devices for electrochemical monitoring of bacterial phenazine production and viability. Sens Actuators, B Chem 378:133090 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Zhang Y et al (2024) One-step laser-induced Cu-embedded graphene for non-enzymatic glucose sensing in beverages. J Alloy Compd 992:174563 [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Maji P, and Mondal S (2024) Fashionable and disposable electrochemical sensors as modern healthcare appliance, in Smart medical imaging for diagnosis and treatment planning. Chapman and Hall/CRC. pp 137–154
  • 78.Kongkaew S et al (2024) Single laser synthesis of gold nanoparticles-polypyrrole-chitosan on laser-induced graphene for ascorbic acid detection. Talanta 278:126446 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Soleh A et al (2023) A wireless smartphone-based “tap-and-detect” formaldehyde sensor with disposable nano-palladium grafted laser-induced graphene (nanoPd@ LIG) electrodes. Talanta 254:124169 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Pushparaj K et al (2024) Nonenzymatic potentiometric detection of ascorbic acid with porphyrin/ZnO-functionalized laser-induced graphene as an electrode of EGFET sensors. ACS Omega 9(9):10650–10659 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Gupta R, Ali H, Verma N (2024) Detection of vanillin in food products over Cu-laser induced graphene nanocomposite using the combined electrochemistry and UV–Vis spectroscopy principles. Microchem J 199:109984 [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Zhang P et al (2023) Electrochemical and electrical biosensors for wearable and implantable electronics based on conducting polymers and carbon-based materials. Chem Rev 124(3):722–767 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Silvestre SIL (2024) Sustainable materials applied to flexible electronics using a laser-induced modular platform. (Doctoral dissertation, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa)
  • 84.Zhang Y et al (2010) Direct imprinting of microcircuits on graphene oxides film by femtosecond laser reduction. Nano Today 5(1):15–20 [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Zaccagnini P et al (2021) Laser-induced graphenization of PDMS as flexible electrode for microsupercapacitors. Adv Mater Interfaces 8(23):2101046 [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Zhang Z et al (2018) Visible light laser-induced graphene from phenolic resin: a new approach for directly writing graphene-based electrochemical devices on various substrates. Carbon 127:287–296 [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Houeix Y et al (2023) Laser-synthesis of conductive carbon-based materials from two flexible commercial substrates: a comparison. Appl Surf Sci 634:157629 [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Ashour GRS (2021) Synthesis and characterization of new sulfur containing polymers for biological interest. (Doctoral dissertation, KING ABDULAZIZ UNIVERSITY JEDDAH)
  • 89.Aristizábal SL, Lively RP, Nunes SP (2023) Solvent and thermally stable polymeric membranes for liquid molecular separations: recent advances, challenges, and perspectives. J Membr Sci 685:121972 [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Biswas RK (2023) Carbonization of polyimide using CO2 laser and femtosecond laser for sensor applications. Ph. D. Thesis, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
  • 91.Liu L et al (2024) Low-threshold distributed feedback laser based on holographic polymer dispersed liquid crystals through the oriented organic semiconductor films. Sci Rep 14(1):17790 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Kurra N et al (2019) Laser-derived graphene: a three-dimensional printed graphene electrode and its emerging applications. Nano Today 24:81–102 [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Yu H et al (2023) Laser-induced direct graphene patterning: from formation mechanism to flexible applications. Soft Sci 3(1): 4
  • 94.Dreimol CH et al (2022) Sustainable wood electronics by iron-catalyzed laser-induced graphitization for large-scale applications. Nat Commun 13(1):3680 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Nam HK et al (2023) Smart wooden home enabled by direct-written laser-induced graphene. Advanced Materials Technologies 8(9):2201952 [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Cheng L et al (2021) Laser-induced graphene for environmental applications: progress and opportunities. Materials Chemistry Frontiers 5(13):4874–4891 [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Ye R, James DK, Tour JM (2018) Laser-induced graphene. Acc Chem Res 51(7):1609–1620 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Le TSD et al (2022) Green flexible graphene–inorganic-hybrid micro-supercapacitors made of fallen leaves enabled by ultrafast laser pulses. Adv Func Mater 32(20):2107768 [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Thaweeskulchai T, Sakdaphetsiri K, Schulte A (2024) Ten years of laser-induced graphene: impact and future prospect on biomedical, healthcare, and wearable technology. Microchim Acta 191(5):1–30 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Le TSD et al (2019) Ultrafast laser pulses enable one-step graphene patterning on woods and leaves for green electronics. Adv Func Mater 29(33):1902771 [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Owais T, Khater M, Al-Qahtani H (2024) Graphene-based MEMS devices for gas sensing applications: a review. Micro and Nanostructures 195:207954 [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Gao J, He S, Nag A (2021) Electrochemical detection of glucose molecules using laser-induced graphene sensors: a review. Sensors 21(8):2818 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Boutry CM et al (2015) A sensitive and biodegradable pressure sensor array for cardiovascular monitoring. Advanced Materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) 27(43):6954–6961 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Kwon D et al (2016) Highly sensitive, flexible, and wearable pressure sensor based on a giant piezocapacitive effect of three-dimensional microporous elastomeric dielectric layer. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 8(26):16922–16931 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Yoon SG, Park BJ, Chang ST (2017) Highly sensitive piezocapacitive sensor for detecting static and dynamic pressure using ion-gel thin films and conductive elastomeric composites. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 9(41):36206–36219 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.He Z et al (2018) Capacitive pressure sensor with high sensitivity and fast response to dynamic interaction based on graphene and porous nylon networks. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 10(15):12816–12823 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Chen Z et al (2017) Flexible piezoelectric-induced pressure sensors for static measurements based on nanowires/graphene heterostructures. ACS Nano 11(5):4507–4513 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Huang T et al (2018) Phase-separation-induced PVDF/graphene coating on fabrics toward flexible piezoelectric sensors. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 10(36):30732–30740 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Choong CL et al (2014) Highly stretchable resistive pressure sensors using a conductive elastomeric composite on a micropyramid array. Adv Mater 26(21):3451–3458 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Tao L-Q et al (2017) Graphene-paper pressure sensor for detecting human motions. ACS Nano 11(9):8790–8795 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Kim KS et al (2009) Large-scale pattern growth of graphene films for stretchable transparent electrodes. Nature 457(7230):706–710 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Yamada T et al (2011) A stretchable carbon nanotube strain sensor for human-motion detection. Nat Nanotechnol 6(5):296–301 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Ambrosi A et al (2014) Electrochemistry of graphene and related materials. Chem Rev 114(14):7150–7188 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Brownson DA, Kampouris DK, Banks CE (2012) Graphene electrochemistry: fundamental concepts through to prominent applications. Chem Soc Rev 41(21):6944–6976 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Dreyer DR, Todd AD, Bielawski CW (2014) Harnessing the chemistry of graphene oxide. Chem Soc Rev 43(15):5288–5301 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Huang Y et al (2011) Graphene-based biosensors for detection of bacteria and their metabolic activities. J Mater Chem 21(33):12358–12362 [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Kathiravan D, Huang B-R, Saravanan A (2017) Self-assembled hierarchical interfaces of ZnO nanotubes/graphene heterostructures for efficient room temperature hydrogen sensors. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 9(13):12064–12072 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Rasch F et al (2020) Highly selective and ultra-low power consumption metal oxide based hydrogen gas sensor employing graphene oxide as molecular sieve. Sens Actuators, B Chem 320:128363 [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Liu S, Yang X, Feng W (2019) Hydrogen sulfide gas sensor based on copper/graphene oxide coated multi-node thin-core fiber interferometer. Appl Opt 58(9):2152–2157 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Zhang D, Wu Z, Zong X (2019) Flexible and highly sensitive H2S gas sensor based on in-situ polymerized SnO2/rGO/PANI ternary nanocomposite with application in halitosis diagnosis. Sens Actuators, B Chem 289:32–41 [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Koppens F et al (2014) Photodetectors based on graphene, other two-dimensional materials and hybrid systems. Nat Nanotechnol 9(10):780–793 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Vicarelli L et al (2012) Graphene field-effect transistors as room-temperature terahertz detectors. Nat Mater 11(10):865–871 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Yan Y et al (2019) High-performance low-voltage flexible photodetector arrays based on all-solid-state organic electrochemical transistors for photosensing and imaging. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 11(22):20214–20224 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Ganguli A et al (2020) High sensitivity graphene field effect transistor-based detection of DNA amplification. Adv Func Mater 30(28):2001031 [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Hajian R et al (2019) Detection of unamplified target genes via CRISPR–Cas9 immobilized on a graphene field-effect transistor. Nature biomedical engineering 3(6):427–437 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Zhao L (2023) Design and rapid prototyping of graphene-based electrodes fabricated by direct writing for electrochemical biosensing towards point-of-care testing. (Doctoral Thesis, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona)
  • 127.Goel S, Amreen K (2022) Laser induced graphanized microfluidic devices. Biomicrofluidics 16(6):061505 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Claro PIC et al (2022) Sustainable carbon sources for green laser-induced graphene: a perspective on fundamental principles, applications, and challenges. Appl Phys Rev 9(4): 041305
  • 129.Xu G (2018) Laser scribed graphene: fabrication and electrochemical biosensors for neurotransmitters. (Doctoral Thesis, University of Auckland)
  • 130.Dixit N, Singh SP (2022) Laser-induced graphene (LIG) as a smart and sustainable material to restrain pandemics and endemics: a perspective. ACS Omega 7(6):5112–5130 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Muzyka K, Xu G (2022) Laser-induced graphene in facts, numbers, and notes in view of electroanalytical applications: a review. Electroanalysis 34(4):574–589 [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Zhang Z et al (2023) A review of laser-induced graphene: from experimental and theoretical fabrication processes to emerging applications. Carbon 214:118356
  • 133.Movaghgharnezhad S, Kang P (2024) Laser-induced graphene: synthesis advances, structural tailoring, enhanced properties, and sensing applications. J Mater Chem C 12(19):6718–6742
  • 134.Ye R, James DK, Tour JM (2019) Laser-induced graphene: from discovery to translation. Adv Mater 31(1):1803621 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Tripathy A et al (2014) Role of morphological structure, doping, and coating of different materials in the sensing characteristics of humidity sensors. Sensors 14(9):16343–16422 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Mathankumar M et al (2024) Pulsed laser deposition as an efficient tool to enhance the performance of electrocatalysis design, strategies and current perspectives. Int J Hydrogen Energy 60:668–687 [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Silva NF et al (2019) In situ formation of gold nanoparticles in polymer inclusion membrane: application as platform in a label-free potentiometric immunosensor for Salmonella typhimurium detection. Talanta 194:134–142 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Balandin AA (2011) Thermal properties of graphene and nanostructured carbon materials. Nat Mater 10(8):569–581 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Craciun MF et al (2011) Tuneable electronic properties in graphene. Nano Today 6(1):42–60 [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Vanegas DC et al (2017) Emerging biorecognition and transduction schemes for rapid detection of pathogenic bacteria in food. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety 16(6):1188–1205 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Wang J (2008) Electrochemical glucose biosensors. Chem Rev 108(2):814–825 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Abellán-Llobregat A et al (2017) A stretchable and screen-printed electrochemical sensor for glucose determination in human perspiration. Biosens Bioelectron 91:885–891 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Mahapatra S, Kumari R, Chandra P (2024) Fabrication of a laser-directed electrochemical paper analytical device and its deployment for multi-functional electrochemical sensing. Chem Eng J 486:150232 [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Kumari R, Chandra P (2023) Electrochemical nano-imprinting of trimetallic dendritic surface for ultrasensitive detection of cephalexin in pharmaceutical formulations. Pharmaceutics 15(3):876 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145.Ranjan Srivastava V, Kumari R, Chandra P (2023) Miniaturized surface engineered technologies for multiplex biosensing devices. Electroanalysis 35(8):e202200355 [Google Scholar]
  • 146.Mahapatra S, Kumari R, Chandra P (2024) Printed circuit boards: system automation and alternative matrix for biosensing. Trends Biotechnol 42(5):591–611 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147.Gerstl F et al (2022) Miniaturized sensor for electroanalytical and electrochemiluminescent detection of pathogens enabled through laser-induced graphene electrodes embedded in microfluidic channels. Lab Chip 22(19):3721–3733 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148.Xia H-Q et al (2023) In situ formed and fully integrated laser-induced graphene electrochemical chips for rapid and simultaneous determination of bioflavonoids in citrus fruits. Microchem J 188:108474 [Google Scholar]
  • 149.Chen J et al (2023) Highly sensitive detection of formaldehyde by laser-induced graphene-coated silver nanoparticles electrochemical sensing electrodes. Langmuir 39(36):12762–12773 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150.Vanegas DC et al (2018) Laser scribed graphene biosensor for detection of biogenic amines in food samples using locally sourced materials. Biosensors 8(2):42 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151.Soares RR et al (2023) Ion-selective electrodes based on laser-induced graphene as an alternative method for nitrite monitoring. Microchim Acta 190(1):43 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152.Qiu D et al (2022) A low-cost wireless intelligent portable sensor based on disposable laser-induced porous graphene flexible electrode decorated by gold nanoshells for rapid detection of sulfonamides in aquatic products. Food Anal Methods 15(6):1471–1481 [Google Scholar]
  • 153.Zheng L, Cao Y, Chen S (2024) Molecular imprinting sensors based on laser-induced graphene for tigecycline sensing. Int J Electrochem Sci 19(9):100710 [Google Scholar]
  • 154.Zeng Y et al (2022) The fabrication of a flexible and portable sensor based on home-made laser-induced porous graphene electrode for the rapid detection of sulfonamides. Microchem J 182:107898 [Google Scholar]
  • 155.Qiu Z et al (2024) Foldable paper-based photoelectrochemical biosensor based on etching reaction of CoOOH nanosheets-coated laser-induced PbS/CdS/graphene for sensitive detection of ampicillin. Talanta 275:126085 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156.Vignesh K et al (2024) Ag-La (OH) 3@ Dy2O3 hybrid composite modified laser-induced graphene surface for simultaneous electrochemical detection of bisphenol A and tartrazine. Appl Surf Sci 676:160901 [Google Scholar]
  • 157.Liu X et al (2022) Portable electrochemical biosensor based on laser-induced graphene and MnO2 switch-bridged DNA signal amplification for sensitive detection of pesticide. Biosens Bioelectron 199:113906 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 158.Johnson ZT et al (2022) Enzymatic laser-induced graphene biosensor for electrochemical sensing of the herbicide glyphosate. Global Chall 6(9):2200057 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 159.Cullum BM, Kiehl D, McLamore ES (2016) Smart biomedical and physiological sensor technology XIII In Proc of SPIE vol 9863:pp 986301–1
  • 160.Bhaiyya ML, Pattnaik PK, Goel S (2021) Miniaturized electrochemiluminescence platform with laser-induced graphene-based single electrode for interference-free sensing of dopamine, xanthine, and glucose. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 70:1–833776080 [Google Scholar]
  • 161.Bhaiyya M, Pattnaik PK, Goel S (2021) Portable electrochemiluminescence platform with laser-induced graphene-based U-shaped bipolar electrode for selective sensing of various analytes. IEEE Trans Electron Devices 68(5):2447–2454 [Google Scholar]
  • 162.Kumari R, Mendki N, Chandra P (2024) Smartphone-integrated automated sensor employing electrochemically engineered 3D bimetallic nanoflowers for hydrogen peroxide quantification in milk. Langmuir 40(21):11146–11159 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 163.Alamgir A, Alamgir A (2018) Vitamins, nutraceuticals, food additives, enzymes, anesthetic aids, and cosmetics. Therapeutic use of medicinal plants and their extracts: vol 2. Phytochemistry and Bioactive Compounds, pp 407–534
  • 164.Ijarotimi OS, Fatiregun MR, Oluwajuyitan TD (2022) Nutritional, antioxidant and organoleptic properties of therapeutic-complementary-food formulated from locally available food materials for severe acute malnutrition management. Bulletin of the National Research Centre 46(1):39 [Google Scholar]
  • 165.Barra A et al (2020) Graphene derivatives in biopolymer-based composites for food packaging applications. Nanomaterials 10(10):2077 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 166.Fu L et al (2020) Applications of graphene and Its derivatives in the upstream oil and gas industry: a systematic review. Nanomaterials 10(6):1013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 167.Yu Z et al (2022) Smart traceability for food safety. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 62(4):905–916 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 168.Yousefi H et al (2019) Intelligent food packaging: a review of smart sensing technologies for monitoring food quality. ACS sensors 4(4):808–821 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 169.Rawat S (2015) Food spoilage: microorganisms and their prevention. Asian journal of plant science and Research 5(4):47–56 [Google Scholar]
  • 170.Kamboj S et al (2020) Food safety and hygiene: a review. International journal of chemical studies 8(2):358–368 [Google Scholar]
  • 171.Rai VR, Bai JA (2017) Food safety and protection. CRC Press
  • 172.Chen X et al (2024) Laser-induced graphene based flexible sensing and heating for food monitoring. ACS Appl Electron Mater 6(5):3597–3609 [Google Scholar]
  • 173.Fan K et al (2021) Laser-induced microporous modified atmosphere packaging and chitosan carbon-dot coating as a novel combined preservation method for fresh-cut cucumber. Food Bioprocess Technol 14:968–983 [Google Scholar]
  • 174.Kannan SK et al (2020) A review on chemical and electrochemical methodologies for the sensing of biogenic amines. Anal Methods 12(27):3438–3453 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 175.Müller DG et al (2022) Biogenic amine sensors and its building materials: a review. Eur Polymer J 175:111221 [Google Scholar]
  • 176.Givanoudi S et al (2023) A review on bio-and chemosensors for the detection of biogenic amines in food safety applications: the status in 2022. Sensors 23(2):613 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 177.Miller K, Reichert CL, Schmid M (2023) Biogenic amine detection systems for intelligent packaging concepts: meat and meat products. Food Rev Intl 39(5):2543–2567 [Google Scholar]
  • 178.Jo K et al (2020) Nitrite sources for cured meat products. Lwt 129:109583 [Google Scholar]
  • 179.Honikel K-O (2008) The use and control of nitrate and nitrite for the processing of meat products. Meat Sci 78(1–2):68–76 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 180.Macdougall DB, Mottram DS, Rhodes DN (1975) Contribution of nitrite and nitrate to the colour and flavour of cured meats. J Sci Food Agric 26(11):1743–1754 [Google Scholar]
  • 181.Froehlich DA, Gullett E, Usborne W (1983) Effect of nitrite and salt on the color, flavor and overall acceptability of ham. J Food Sci 48(1):152–154 [Google Scholar]
  • 182.Salvia A et al (2023) Full-LIG wireless batteryless sensor for the detection of amines. in 2023 IEEE International Conference on Flexible and Printable Sensors and Systems (FLEPS), pp 1–4. IEEE
  • 183.Virto M et al (2022) Antibiotics in dairy production: where is the problem? Dairy 3(3):541–564 [Google Scholar]
  • 184.Darko G et al (2017) Veterinary antibiotics in dairy products from Kumasi, Ghana. Cogent chemistry 3(1):1343636 [Google Scholar]
  • 185.Ulusoy BH, Chirkena K (2019) Two perspectives of Listeria monocytogenes hazards in dairy products: the prevalence and the antibiotic resistance. Food Quality and Safety 3(4):233–241 [Google Scholar]
  • 186.Donovan C (2015) If FDA does not regulate food, who will? A study of hormones and antibiotics in meat production. Am J Law Med 41(2–3):459–482 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 187.Marshall BM, Levy SB (2011) Food animals and antimicrobials: impacts on human health. Clin Microbiol Rev 24(4):718–733 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 188.Patel SJ et al (2020) Antibiotic stewardship in food-producing animals: challenges, progress, and opportunities. Clin Ther 42(9):1649–1658 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 189.McGrath T, Elliott C, Fodey T (2012) Biosensors for the analysis of microbiological and chemical contaminants in food. Anal Bioanal Chem 403:75–92 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 190.Thompson LA, Darwish WS (2019) Environmental chemical contaminants in food: review of a global problem. Journal of toxicology 2019(1):2345283 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 191.Schecter A et al (2010) Perfluorinated compounds, polychlorinated biphenyls, and organochlorine pesticide contamination in composite food samples from Dallas, Texas, USA. Environ Health Perspect 118(6):796–802 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 192.Ridgway K, Lalljie SP, Smith RM (2007) Sample preparation techniques for the determination of trace residues and contaminants in foods. J Chromatogr A 1153(1–2):36–53 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 193.Pérez-Ortega P et al (2017) Screening of over 600 pesticides, veterinary drugs, food-packaging contaminants, mycotoxins, and other chemicals in food by ultra-high performance liquid chromatography quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry (UHPLC-QTOFMS). Food Anal Methods 10:1216–1244 [Google Scholar]
  • 194.Turiel E, Martín-Esteban A (2008) Sample handling of pesticides in food and environmental samples. In: Analysis of pesticides in food and environmental samples. CRC Press, pp 47–70
  • 195.Sadighara P et al (2023) Residues of carcinogenic pesticides in food: a systematic review. Rev Environ Health 39(4):659–666 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 196.Mohamed AH et al (2023) Sampling and sample preparation techniques for the analysis of organophosphorus pesticides in soil matrices. Crit Rev Anal Chem 53(4):906–927 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 197.Mostaccio A et al (2024) Full-lig wireless battery-less flexible sensor for the detection of triethylamine. IEEE Journal on Flexible Electronics 3(3):90–99
  • 198.Johnson ZT et al (2021) Electrochemical sensing of neonicotinoids using laser-induced graphene. ACS sensors 6(8):3063–3071 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 199.Sain S et al (2022) Electrochemical sensors based on flexible laser-induced graphene for the detection of paraquat in water. ACS Applied Nano Materials 5(12):17516–17525 [Google Scholar]
  • 200.Zhao F et al (2020) Smart plant-wearable biosensor for in-situ pesticide analysis. Biosens Bioelectron 170:112636 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 201.Ghavipanjeh A, Sadeghzadeh S (2024) Diffusion properties of silk-derived laser-induced graphene. Diam Relat Mater 146:111172 [Google Scholar]
  • 202.Mu Y et al (2023) Silver nanoparticles–laser induced graphene (Ag NPs–LIG) hybrid electrodes for sensitive electrochemical-surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy (EC-SERS) detection. Analyst 148(13):3087–3096 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 203.Sadighbayan D, Minhas-Khan A, Ghafar-Zadeh E (2021) Laser-induced graphene-functionalized field-effect transistor-based biosensing: A potent candidate for COVID-19 detection. IEEE Trans Nanobiosci 21(2):232–245 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 204.Zhu J et al (2022) Recent advances in gas and environmental sensing: from micro/nano to the era of self-powered and artificial intelligent (AI)-enabled device. Microchem J 181:107833 [Google Scholar]
  • 205.Mudhulu S et al (2023) Trends in graphene-based E-skin and artificial intelligence for biomedical applications—a review. IEEE Sens J 23(17):18963–18976 [Google Scholar]
  • 206.Min J et al (2023) Recent advances in biodegradable green electronic materials and sensor applications. Adv Mater 35(52):2211273 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 207.Jindal S et al (2022) Sustainable approach for developing graphene-based materials from natural resources and biowastes for electronic applications. ACS Appl Electron Mater 4(5):2146–2174 [Google Scholar]
  • 208.Claro PI et al (2022) Sustainable carbon sources for green laser-induced graphene: A perspective on fundamental principles, applications, and challenges. Appl Phys Rev 9(4):041305 [Google Scholar]
  • 209.Yuge N et al (2001) Purification of metallurgical-grade silicon up to solar grade. Prog Photovoltaics Res Appl 9(3):203–209 [Google Scholar]
  • 210.Liu H et al (2022) Laser processing of flexible in-plane micro-supercapacitors: progresses in advanced manufacturing of nanostructured electrodes. ACS Nano 16(7):10088–10129 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 211.Ling Y et al (2020) Laser-induced graphene for electrothermally controlled, mechanically guided, 3D assembly and human–soft actuators interaction. Adv Mater 32(17):1908475 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 212.Salim A, Lim S (2019) Recent advances in noninvasive flexible and wearable wireless biosensors. Biosens Bioelectron 141:111422 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 213.Meng L, Turner AP, Mak WC (2021) Conducting polymer-reinforced laser-irradiated graphene as a heterostructured 3D transducer for flexible skin patch biosensors. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 13(45):54456–54465 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 214.Chen B et al (2021) Tuning the structure, conductivity, and wettability of laser-induced graphene for multiplexed open microfluidic environmental biosensing and energy storage devices. ACS Nano 16(1):15–28 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 215.d’Amora M et al (2017) Toxicity assessment of carbon nanomaterials in zebrafish during development. Nanomaterials 7(12):414 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 216.Liu XT et al (2014) Toxicity of multi-walled carbon nanotubes, graphene oxide, and reduced graphene oxide to zebrafish embryos. Biomed Environ Sci 27(9):676–683 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 217.Wang ZG et al (2015) Toxicity of graphene quantum dots in zebrafish embryo. Biomed Environ Sci 28(5):341–351 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 218.Liao K-H et al (2011) Cytotoxicity of graphene oxide and graphene in human erythrocytes and skin fibroblasts. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 3(7):2607–2615 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 219.Tonelli FM et al (2015) Graphene-based nanomaterials: biological and medical applications and toxicity. Nanomedicine 10(15):2423–2450 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 220.Xing Y et al (2020) Assessment machining of micro-channel textures on PCD by laser-induced plasma and ultra-short pulsed laser ablation. Opt Laser Technol 125:106057 [Google Scholar]
  • 221.Liu J et al (2022) Laser-induced graphene (LIG)-driven medical sensors for health monitoring and diseases diagnosis. Microchim Acta 189:1–14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 222.Zhang C et al (2022) Human motion-driven self-powered stretchable sensing platform based on laser-induced graphene foams. Appl Phys Rev 9(1): 011413
  • 223.Cheng L et al (2024) Flash healing of laser-induced graphene. Nat Commun 15(1):2925 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 224.Casanova A, Iniesta J, Gomis-Berenguer A (2022) Recent progress in the development of porous carbon-based electrodes for sensing applications. Analyst 147(5):767–783 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 225.Bhattacharya G et al (2022) Disposable paper-based biosensors: optimizing the electrochemical properties of laser-induced graphene. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 14(27):31109–31120 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 226.Marques ACC (2021) Nanobiosensing platforms with Sers and MIP-based technologies. Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Portugal

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.


Articles from Mikrochimica Acta are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES