Skip to main content
. 2025 Jun 12;13(8):e03107-24. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.03107-24

Fig 2.

Western blots and bar graphs compare N protein expression and viral titers in MARC-145 and PAM cells infected with PRRSV strains under DMSO or hyperoside 120 µM treatment.

Broad-spectrum anti-PRRSV assessment of hyperoside. MARC-145 cells were incubated with or without hyperoside (120 µM) for 2 h and then infected with various PRRSV-1 strains (GZ11-G1 and P073-3) at 37°C for 1 h. The cells and cellular supernatants were harvested at 24 hpi to evaluate PRRSV N protein expression via western blot analysis (A), and the progeny virus titer was determined via TCID50 analysis (B). Moreover, the antiviral effects of hyperoside against PRRSV GZ11-G1 and P073-3 were also evaluated in PAMs. These cells were collected at 24 hpi to monitor N protein expression via western blot analysis (C). The cellular supernatants were also harvested to detect progeny virus production on the basis of the TCID50 value (D). MARC-145 cells were pretreated with hyperoside (120 µM) or DMSO for 1 h and then incubated with different PRRSV-2 strains (CH-1a, JXA1, and NADC30-like; MOI 0.1) for 1 h. All cells and cellular supernatants were collected at 24 hpi to assess PRRSV N protein expression (E) and progeny virus titer (F). The antiviral effects of hyperoside against the PRRSV-2 strains CH-1a, JXA1, and NADC30-like were subsequently assessed in PAMs. PRRSV N protein expression was monitored at 24 hpi via western blot analysis (G), and the progeny virus titer was examined on the basis of the TCID50 value (H). GAPDH served as the reference gene, and α-Tubulin served as the loading control. All the data are expressed as the means ± SDs and were subjected to Student’s t-tests. ***, P < 0.001, compared with DMSO-treated cells challenged with the same virus.