Table 3.
Comparison of the score of PSQI each component between the each groups.
| Sleep quality | Sleep latency | Sleep duration | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sham-TEAS group (n = 40) |
TEAS group (n = 41) |
P | Sham-TEAS group (n = 40) |
TEAS group (n = 41) |
P | Sham-TEAS group (n = 40) |
TEAS group (n = 41) |
P | |
| Before treatment | 2.43 ± 0.50 | 2.49 ± 0.51 | .573 | 2.68 ± 0.47 | 2.54 ± 0.60 | .332 | 2.48 ± 0.51 | 2.46 ± 0.50 | .917 |
| After treatment | 2.53 ± 0.51*** | 0.76 ± 0.58 | <.001 | 2.60 ± 0.50*** | 0.73 ± 0.45 | <.001 | 2.30 ± 0.46*** | 0.63 ± 0.49 | <.001 |
| Follow-up period | 2.30 ± 0.46*** | 0.71 ± 0.51 | <.001 | 2.25 ± 0.59*** | 0.73 ± 0.45 | <.001 | 2.43 ± 0.50*** | 0.66 ± 0.53 | <.001 |
| Sleep efficiency | Sleep disturbances | Daytime dysfunction | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sham-TEAS group (n = 40) |
TEAS group (n = 41) |
P | Sham-TEAS group (n = 40) |
TEAS group (n = 41) |
P | Sham-TEAS group (n = 40) |
TEAS group (n = 41) |
P | |
| Before treatment | 2.05 ± 0.55 | 1.95 ± 0.55 | .417 | 2.45 ± 0.50 | 2.41 ± 0.50 | .750 | 2.58 ± 0.50 | 2.49 ± 0.51 | .435 |
| After treatment | 2.00 ± 0.51*** | 0.61 ± 0.49 | <.001 | 2.20 ± 0.41*** | 0.71 ± 0.46 | <.001 | 2.43 ± 0.50*** | 0.66 ± 0.48*** | <.001 |
| Follow- up period |
2.60 ± 0.55*** | 0.63 ± 0.49* | <.001 | 2.53 ± 0.51*** | 0.76 ± 0.49* | <.001 | 2.58 ± 0.50*** | 0.63 ± 0.49*** | <.001 |
***
Compared with sham-TEAS group, P < .001.