Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2025 Aug 5.
Published in final edited form as: J Community Health. 2025 Apr 21;50(5):842–859. doi: 10.1007/s10900-025-01468-4

Table 3.

Stage of PrEP use continuum reached by PrEP Well participants across each phase

Participant-level Efficacy Outcomes All Phases
8/1/22 – 1/31/24
Implementation Phase I
8/1/22 – 1/31/23
Implementation Phase II
2/1/23 – 7/31/23
Sustainment Phase III
8/1/23 – 1/31/24
X2 statistic, p-value
n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%)
Received peer outreach, HIV testing, and peer navigation (baseline visit). N = 113 n = 27 n = 36 n = 50
Attended PrEP visit with provider, labs provided, and PrEP prescription written 60 (53.1) 13 (48.2) 18 (50.0) 29 (58.0) X2(2) = 0.88, p =.64
Returned for 30-day visit and urinalysis showed PrEP uptake 50 (83.3) 10 (76.9) 15 (83.3) 25 (86.2) X2(2) = 0.55, p =.76
Returned for 90-day visit and urinalysis showed sustained PrEP use 44 (73.3) 6 (46.2)* 18 (100.0)+* 20 (70.0) X2(2) = 11.73, p <.01
Returned for 90-day visit and dried blood spots showed PrEP adherence 40 (66.7) 6 (46.2)** 15 (83.3)** 19 (65.5) X2(2) = 4.74, p <.05

Note: Rates of clients who demonstrated PrEP uptake, sustained use, and adherence are compared against the number of clients who attended PrEP visit and received a PrEP prescription (denominator)

+

3 clients missed their 30-day return visits but returned for 90-day visit and demonstrated PrEP uptake

*

Phase I and Phase II post hoc tests were significantly different at 90-day visit for sustained PrEP use via urinalysis X2(1) = 9.75, p <.001

**

Phase I and Phase II post hoc tests were significantly different at 90-day visit for PrEP adherence use via dried blood spot assay X2(1) = 4.70, p <.05