Table 3.
Stage of PrEP use continuum reached by PrEP Well participants across each phase
| Participant-level Efficacy Outcomes | All Phases 8/1/22 – 1/31/24 |
Implementation Phase I 8/1/22 – 1/31/23 |
Implementation Phase II 2/1/23 – 7/31/23 |
Sustainment Phase III 8/1/23 – 1/31/24 |
X2 statistic, p-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n (%) | n (%) | n (%) | n (%) | ||
| Received peer outreach, HIV testing, and peer navigation (baseline visit). | N = 113 | n = 27 | n = 36 | n = 50 | |
| Attended PrEP visit with provider, labs provided, and PrEP prescription written | 60 (53.1) | 13 (48.2) | 18 (50.0) | 29 (58.0) | X2(2) = 0.88, p =.64 |
| Returned for 30-day visit and urinalysis showed PrEP uptake | 50 (83.3) | 10 (76.9) | 15 (83.3) | 25 (86.2) | X2(2) = 0.55, p =.76 |
| Returned for 90-day visit and urinalysis showed sustained PrEP use | 44 (73.3) | 6 (46.2)* | 18 (100.0)+* | 20 (70.0) | X2(2) = 11.73, p <.01 |
| Returned for 90-day visit and dried blood spots showed PrEP adherence | 40 (66.7) | 6 (46.2)** | 15 (83.3)** | 19 (65.5) | X2(2) = 4.74, p <.05 |
Note: Rates of clients who demonstrated PrEP uptake, sustained use, and adherence are compared against the number of clients who attended PrEP visit and received a PrEP prescription (denominator)
3 clients missed their 30-day return visits but returned for 90-day visit and demonstrated PrEP uptake
Phase I and Phase II post hoc tests were significantly different at 90-day visit for sustained PrEP use via urinalysis X2(1) = 9.75, p <.001
Phase I and Phase II post hoc tests were significantly different at 90-day visit for PrEP adherence use via dried blood spot assay X2(1) = 4.70, p <.05